Wednesday, 24 October 2007

Racial Awareness Day

It must've been Racial Awareness Day recently for I heard some ridiculous news items.

One was a pair of overpaid African footballers releasing a (c)rap song against "racism in football."

Really?

Children are shot and stabbed in the street and even the media acknowledge that most of this comes from 'immigrant communities' - yet it's so important to "stamp out" virtually non-existent "racism" in football!!!

Meanwhile in America some "civil rights" bunch of overpaid politicos wanted action against racism after (get ready for this!) a teacher in New York was sent a letter with a little model noose in it!

Hold the front pages!

Children are shot with gay abandon (see 1950s dictionary for details) with a worrying regularity in the states, and much of this comes from 'immigrant communities' -- is anyone spotting the connection here? -- and we should be worried about one childish letter???

Still - we're told millions more people will live here because of immigration.

Have we learnt no lessons from the past? Our children are taught (c/o Al Gore) about the "evils" of global warming yet we have no open and honest debate about immigration.

Guns, drugs, gangs, violence, no-go areas, muggings...

The media always tells us we "benefit" from immigration.

NO.

Big business benefits from a cheap workforce. Politicians benefit from people who sit on benefits and vote accordingly.

But how do we benefit? From the countryside being concreted over? From the gangs and guns? From increased taxes to pay for schools, hospitals etc.? From the break-up of our own communities? From the loss of identity?

Mass immigration, mass coloured immigration, has been a disaster.

We have gained NOTHING. We have lost a culture, a nation, a birthright, security, identity etc.

And now they tell us that 10 or 20 million more will pour in by such and such a date, as if we have no say, no rights, there is no debate.

Gonads to global warming! We'll be swamped by millions of immigrants long before we ever get swamped by the seven seas!

We have enough criminals, rapists, gangsters and low lives of our own - with no need to import more whose state of rootlessness makes them fodder for the criminal gangs.

Monday, 22 October 2007

With Us or Against Us Mr. Bush?

"Is it me?" is a modern-day cry of those bewildered by the bizarre nature of political correctness and the opaque nature of the lies spun by governments (primarily those based in Westminster, Washington DC and Brussels/Strasbourg).

It has become a badge of honour to those who were brought up to believe in honesty, clear speaking and calling a spade a spade.

In the last 48 hours I have found myself mumbling this statement of defiance against modernist obfuscation in the matter of two pending wars.

The first is the war planned against Iran. Zionist(s in) America wants this war. Therefore we read in the weekend papers how British and American special forces have already been make "excursions" into Iran to fight the Revolutionary Guards... etc. etc.

A sovereign nation is invaded by our army (not for the first time) and Brown, like Blair before him, batters not an eyelid. Our "democratic" Masonic overlords have given their approval: and that is what matters!

Meanwhile the Communist Kurdish PKK have been shelling Turkey. Turkey is itching to invade Iraq to try and bash the PKK, and what to Bush and Brown do?

Urge restraint!

I see.

So it's OK for the UK and the USA to invade Iraq over a false, made-up "dodgy dossier." Equally it's fine for our forces to be sent into Iran over more WMD shenanigans (via orders coming from Tel Aviv)...

Yet when Turkey wants to move against "terrorists" on their own border - Bush and Co "urge restraint!"

It shows what a farce the war against Iraq and the planned war against Iran are.

Did Bush ever show restraint? Did Blair?

Iran is no threat to us, nor its neighbours.

There is one "nation" in the Mid East which starts wars, invades neighbours, bombs nearby states, embroils our troops in non-winnable conflicts, and has illegal nukes, already probably aimed on us and other European nations.

That "nation" is Israel.

Still, as the Kurds are no threat to Israel (some say they are allied!) Turkey is urged to "show restraint."

Whatever happened to zero tolerance of "terrorists" - where are the B52s over Kurdish-Iraq? Under Bush's own agenda and using his own (garbled) statements as a rule of thumb, surely anyone who isn't against the "terrorists" is for the "terrorists" -- so in urging restraint, isn't he taking the stance taken by (e.g.) the French prior to the war in Iraq?

Remember the American politicians and the Murdoch press (heck, let's just call them "Zionists"!) labelled them "cheese-eating surrender monkeys?"

Yet when it comes to other "terrorists" Bush doesn't want gung-ho action and Rumsfeldesque "precision bombing" (aka wiping out wedding parties etc.).

That's the key to international conflicts and modern geo-politics:

What Israel tells its American sugar daddy is the right thing, and that is what becomes the policy of the "international community."

Saturday, 20 October 2007

Ignorance and Revisionism

In recent weeks and months the BBC has performed a series of Mea Culpas over reporting duplicity and rigged phone votes.

Other channels have suffered too, but the BBC (which many, though not nationalists, have regarded as a study of probity and honesty) has been most dreadfully damaged because of its reputation for "fairness".

So the BBC (with its in-house production and external producers) have taken a battering - pretty much choreographed, but a battering nonetheless.

Integrity. Honesty. Truthfulness. Openness.

These seem to be the benchmarks of the 'New BBC.'

Yet, just like New Labour and (Brown's) New New Labour, this is so much exterior whitewashing, and whilst at first (as with the newspapers' denouncement of Paparazzi intrusive photos after the death of Princess Di) it appears to be shiny white with heartfelt promises being made throughout the media - it won't take long for the cracks to start showing again: for it is the very nature of the media to make things far more certain and far more "sexy" than they are in our 'real lives' which tend to be far more drab, hypocritical, mundane... than BBC reports might have it.

And so how long before the BBC bring out another "fake-umentary" with "evil Neo-Nazis" or "extremist Christian fundamentalists" etc. etc.

How long before the BBC addresses the real problems with multi-culturalism and mass coloured immigration? Or the damage done to society by abortion? Or the harmful nature (to individual, community and nation) of homosexuality? Or the truth about usury and the banking swindle?

How long before the BBC puts out a programme defending our Christian heritage instead of mocked-up "history" full of modern ideals and spin?

In the last few weeks I've had the misfortune to see the Tudors, the BBC2 "history" of an early Henry VIII, made very much in the manner of the series 'Rome.' I've also seen a couple of the programmes of the new Robin Hood series.

The Tudors is crammed full of Grade A Bull Guano in which only St. Thomas Moore and Henry's first wife are seen to be fully Christian... and even in these cases Moore keeps banging on about being a "humanist." Since when does a Christian saint subscribe to the ideals of Freemasonry - and those from a latter century? Of course, Catherine of Aragon is pretty much dismissed as a foreignor.

It all stinks of a modern re-write of history.

We should be used to the lies (from the pens of Jusaisers and Zionists) concerning events such as the Spanish Inquisition or World War Two - all done for political ends - but now we're facing the twisting of hitherto accepted norms, such as St Thomas Moore actually being a Christian.

As for the BBC's Robin Hood - well that just limps from outrage to outrage.

Some of the long-term readers of this blog (you die-hards, you gluttons for punishment!) will know that I have written a diatribe about this series before (there was a negro sergeant-at-arms in the first series). Now we have the ridiculous situation of an Asian (Saracen) woman (and she a genius too!) in Hood's Saxon outlaws and yet another negro! - this time as a genius (as ever!) blacksmith (though they just called him a smith - very pc) in the village of Locksley.

With two Negroes in close proximity of Nottingham, one would be forgiven for thinking that there must have been thousands of coloureds living the length and breadth of England at this time!

Add in the Asians (supposedly) living in England too - and you can see the message being sent out far and wide: we were a peaceful multi-culti land back then - just as we are now!

What the concocters of this garbage forget is that the Saxons fought the Normans to remain free... and these were related peoples. The same concocters tend to overlook the Crusades, at least when they are mentioned at all, the heroes tend to speak out against them (again, in a very "humanist" way).

See the message: Christianity is bad. Homogeneity is bad. The English (apart from a "Masonic" Saint!?!) were ambivalent to the Faith and uncultured morons. Whereas Multi-Culti is good. Race-mixing was accepted. Other cultures brought understanding and learning.

Our history, our heritage, our religion, our peoples, our nations - everything about us is being undermined by a set of politically correct degenerates.

We should not... no, strike that. We must not accept these outrageous assaults on our history, on our forefathers.

A few re-edited scenes regarding the Queen? Who cares? - well ok, it is indicative of a wider editorial malaise in the BBC that sees them making fast and loose with the facts; but compare it to willful re-writing of our history and the rush to transfer the multi-culti, Freemasonic ideals (of a failed experiment!) to an age when our people were Christian, secure, homogeneous...

No-one is suggesting that all in the garden was rosy: but the idea of our forefathers being ignorant uncultured savages is a nonsense. They were probably more aware of their country, their way of life, their Faith, their freedoms, their soil and their blood than the great swathe of Sun-reading, Eastenders-watching morons today who keep placing their faith in treacherous Masonic politicians.

That's why even when Henry VIII tried to claim more powers for himself by closing the monasteries and grabbing the land -- which had been used to support the monastic institutions which cared for the sick, the poor and the destitute (as well as travellers) which would have to be replaced years later by the awful workhouses -- revolts and uprisings occurred, amongst other places, in Yorkshire and the West Country some of which had to be put-down by hired mercenaries from abroad.

Today the land is grabbed by absentee landlord insurance conglomerates to be farmed by huge chemical agri-business and what do the people care about? Phone-ins being rigged on meaningless chewing-gum TV which only the brain-dead would have the notion would be 'money well spent!'

Did the people of Devon and Yorkshire have more political awareness 500 years ago? More notion of freedom? More awareness of faith and heritage?

When I erringly stumble on a Sun editorial or I overhear someone talking about a family upheaval on some TV show, I am tempted to think so.

Friday, 19 October 2007

Orders: 24 hours again.

Just to let people know that the mail does seem to be getting back to normal, both incoming and outgoing.

Whilst the recent Post Strike was on we had some orders slowed down. However, it now seems that the orders are arriving promptly.

Our incoming mail was badly affected, especially as the Central London P.O. continued with wildcat strikes after the main P.O. was back in work.

Whilst there may be a tiny minority of delayed letters etc. it now looks like all is back to normal and you can expect to get your orders not only sent promptly, but arriving promptly too.

To date, October has been very quiet - perhaps because of the strike; so if you're thinking of placing an order, please do so and help keep us ticking over.

Wednesday, 17 October 2007

Chewing the Fat on Immigration

According to who you want to believe in media-land we're turning into a nation of fatties.

Obesity, so "they" tell us, is the "new Global Warming."

By that they don't mean another fallacy or con job (I suspect) but rather that this requires urgent attention!

The power of nightmares part 94.

Isn't it funny how those responsible for creating a mess are always the loudest in shrieking for something to be done?

Capitalism insists on the "power of advertising" which, in turn, creates a "do what thou wilt" society (to quote Alestair Crowley).

In an age when Big Bucks is all that matters, the shoddiest produced, brightly wrapped, crammed with sugar, heavily advertised "treats" will be the ones that sell.

Oh yes, things were so "drab" in the 50s when we all ate fresh veg and meat...

The Capitalists who bank-roll the political parties are the ones whose supermarkets insist on aisle after aisle of sweets, crisps, ready-made "meals" and other chemically-crammed foodstuffs.

With extra sweets n snacks piled up by the till just to get little Jack or Sophie pulling at mum's sleeve for one more pack of sugar disguised as food.

And the politicians? As someone phoned in to a radio this week said, they are the ones who've sold off the playing-fields and told schools that competitive sports are "bad."

Unless and until someone comes along who will fight against the big businesses, the TV and Playstation culture and demand football, hockey, netball and rugby for all schoolchildren three times a week - we'll be(come) a "nation of fatties."

But such things are not "popular" - ask Jamie Oliver (the "naked chef") who tried to get good food into schools... and in a "democracy" it isn't what is CORRECT that matters - but rather what is 'popular' or (to be more precise) what makes the most money and what the advertisers can make 'popular.'

Anyway, while we're at it - in this climate of continual studies to tell us what's bad for us, and the problems we'll face in the future - isn't it about time we had one of those on immigration?

And I mean a proper study and a proper debate!

Left: Immigration and Emigration figures. As most people leaving the UK (for Europe, North America etc.) are British and/or Whites - this merely exacerbates the situation. Many liberals and reds argue that we "need" immigration because people are leaving. What they don't tell us is the racial make-up of those leaving, nor that if it weren't for immigration and the mess it causes, many would not leave.

There was one of those ridiculous ones the other day about immigration from Eastern Europe - you know the highly politicised sort which cannot disguise the costs in schooling, healthcare and housing (let alone law and order) but which drones on about the benefits to our economy.

Now let me get one thing straight - and it's a contentious point for some I know: I am not opposed per se to immigration from Eastern Europe.

Many of these people are hard-working fellow Europeans who bring their White faces, Christian heritage to some of the 'darkest' areas of London, Birmingham etc.

The problem I have is with the Asiatic gypsies and criminal Albanians who have crept in under the cover of Lithuanians and Poles; the scale of the immigration (which should have been far more curtailed and controlled); and the lack of controls re. those with criminal records (rapists, thieves, etc.)

As an aside, I also take umbrage with the need for so many workers when we have so many druggy deadbeats, anarcho-do nothings and others who sit on the dole getting my tax money for doing bugger all. If they won't pick spuds or clean hotel rooms then why should they get continual hand-outs and housing benefit for life?

To my mind, a controlled amount of healthy, law-abiding families and a balanced mix of men and women from the Baltic Nations, Poland, Hungary etc. would be acceptable - just as the Poles and East Europeans who settled here after WW2 (many anti-Communists) settled, assimilated and became good "Brits" albeit with their own heritage and culture.

I have had the good fortune to meet many of these people - including those who served with distinction on the Eastern front fighting Bolshevism, and their families are perfectly settled, hard-working, tax-paying, Church-going Brits of European extraction.

One might compare them to the Irish of North London, the Italians of South Wales and others who have assimilated and added European cultures to our homeland.

No, I am not opposed per se to Poles and Balts - more so the manner in which the influx occurred.

For me it is not so much about space (though this must be taken into account, obviously) but RACE.

So, to return to my point, let us have a real study, a real report, a real debate.

Our inner cities are awash with drugs, gangs and drugs. These have killed more than any so-called Al Qaeda "threat" (or CIA/Mossad threat).

Where is the debate? The children and grandchildren of the African and Asian settlers of the 50s, 60s and 70s have brought us what exactly?

Why are those still flooding in from Africa and Asia never talked about?

The Poles are put up as a "smokescreen." What about the Afghanis, the Somalis, the Bangladeshis, the Pakistanis that are still flooding in?

While we're at it, let's have a debate about the impact on our country, our culture, our communities?

Communities in London, Berkshire, the Midlands, Lancashire etc. etc. have been destroyed. Communities where everyone knew everyone and the door was always open: these days have evaporated.

Left: An industry has sprung up, including advisers, solicitors, community workers and council helpers which tells immigrants how best they can get free housing, free healthcare, free food, free money and more. This book claims to be for professionals and visitors, but much of the advice available out there, to those from the Third World, goes to those who come to milk the benefit system.


The Christian nature (however nominal) of our land has imploded in a wave of Muslims, Sikhs, Zoroastrians , Buddhists, Animists and (literally!) God knows what else - and the cohesive nature of Faith has been replaced by a fractious, antagonistic mess whilst our own creed has faced frontal assault by Communists in local government and an "ecumenical" fifth column of Reds and faggots from the 'oh so modern' seminaries.

Communities that were homogenous, Christian, hard-working, law-abiding have been replaced by what?

I was near my old junior school the other week as it emptied. Talk about spot the white child! These are Asians born here, so they won't even figure in any immigration statistics and yet in 10 - 15 years the community I grew up in will be even more Asian than it is now!
What have we to thank immigration for?

Big Business has profited by under-cutting wages which the government tells us is a good thing ("it helps the economy").

We have more curry restaurants and rap music.

Is that worth it? Is it worth the upheaval? The violence? The drugs? The guns? The alienation? The family break-down? The rootless offspring?

So whilst liberals and quangos bring out reports, stimulate media headlines and constantly whine on about Global Warming, obesity and whatever else is the flavour of the day -- we face a media lockdown and government lies about long-scale, mass immigration, especially in regard to non-Europeans.

It's enough to make you turn to chocolate and crisps!

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

Freedom's Fashion

We've promoted our FREE ERNST ZUNDEL badge as a means to raise funds to help the brave defender of academic and historic freedoms Ernst Zundel.

According to David Williams (who he?) of Searchlies "[the badge] will no doubt become this season's essential fashion accessory for the discerning fascist eager to advertise his or her bigotry."

Well quite!

What they see as a put-down actually encompasses exactly what the badge should be, but rather than displaying "bigotry," the badge actually shows the wearer's adherence to freedom and their refusal to bow to the lies, pressure and blackmail of a Zionist behemoth which engages in locking up writers and academics, as well as attacking sovereign nations and excusing the murderous actions of a terrorist regime which illegally occupies Palestine.

Still... the thought was there!

Support Ernst Zundel. Buy and wear the badge!

Go get it:

Link
Free Ernst Zundel Badge

Saturday, 6 October 2007

Nationalist Online Encyclopaedia

NATIONALIST COUNTER-WIKIPEDIA SITE

A good friend sent me the following text received from French comrades:

Have a look on our new web-project :

www.eruditus.info

C'est une encyclopédie sur internet, comme wikipedia, mais d'esprit contre-révolutionnaire.

en.eruditus.info en anglais

fr.eruditus.info en français

et pourquoi pas d'autres langues.

www.eruditus.info deviendrait alors le site d'accueil général redirigeant vers les sites en différentes langues.

---

I urge all FC readers and supporters to visit the site and help it in whatever way you can.

The French nationalists behind the site are absolutely genuine and their politics are our politics.

Visitez vous le site [repeat that in your best schoolboy French!]

Friday, 5 October 2007

Era of No-Change

Gordon Brown says it's an era of change...

David Cameron says only he can deliver real change.

How long before people realise that this bunch of rich Freemasons will just deliver: more of the same.

You can sense a rant starting can't you dear reader?

Suffice to say that the usual downward spiral will continue.

Unless and until we get a political leader who has the cajones to stand up to the vested interests and the moral fibre to stand out against the background of money-grubbing, corruption and nepotism we might as well forget the whole party charade, stacked as it is in favour of all things Masonic.

There's a saying, anyone who wants to be Prime Minister should be automatically barred from the job.

Thus far that saying has yet to be proved wrong, no matter which party you like at.

There. I avoided a rant! Though it wasn't easy! ;-)

Thursday, 4 October 2007

Liberal and Zionist: It's the BNP

A good friend, whose integrity and honesty are well regarded throughout the wider nationalist cause sent me this, and I think it is of interest to those within the BNP (who are kept in the dark) and those who seek to oppose the liberalisation and (dare I say it?) Zionification of the "nationalist movement" of which the BNP is a part:


One of my sources within the BNP writes:

"Griffin seems to be getting rid of his old Executive Committee, and forming a new invisible one, incorporating;
Arthur Kemp; Tony Lecomber; Patrick Harrington; Simon Darby; Lee Barnes. This inner circle is nothing to do with the EC, but the real people that Griffin shares ideas with. As the EC can get rid of the Party Chairman by a two thirds majority if they wish, rumour has it that Griffin is moving to abolish the EC.

"Doc Russell [FC: BNP Press Officer] had a heated argument with Arthur Kemp about Tony Lecomber. Kemp told him he was a useless fat old f###er who should just go away. This was the real reason for his departure, and not because of Doc's first wife being Polish.

"The general feeling amongst the (ever growing) anti-Griffin crowd, is that Griffin wishes to use the European elections to put all the party's resources into fighting the best seat. Griffin hopes to get elected, whereby he'll be on £250,000 a year tax free + expenses + pension. After five years, he would then be in a position to switch parties if he so wished (ahem), and then possibly retain his seat for another five years.

"Ciao for now,"

It's an interesting thought that of those on this list, Arthur Kemp has been named by Gaye Darby-Lewis (wife of jailed South African patriot Clive Darby-Lewis) as a South African police spy, Simon Darby (who lives a comfortable middle class life style without visible means of support, and claims to be in business while working virtually full time for the BNP, without drawing a salary from the party) is probably a career MI5 agent, while the late John Tyndall suspected that Tony Lecomber had been "turned" by the British state during his second spell in gaol (when he received a remarkably light sentence for attacking a Jewish school teacher). Lee Barnes is completely insane, while Patrick Harrington is nominally the leader of another political party (the Third Way)!


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com