The more aware of you will recall my recent post pouring scorn on our beloved government's usage of "anti-terror" laws to freeze Icelandic banking assets in the UK.
Right: Damian Green MP. "Really Archbishop? You say it's all in The Protocols? Gosh. I think I'll have another custard cream!"
This, I eschewed from my lofty seat, was evidence enough that the kind of knee-jerk legislation passed in the shadow of false flag ops like "911" in the USA or "7/7" here in the UK are detrimental.
Little did I know as my lackeys tapped out my missive on the jewel-encrusted keyboard used for posting messages herein, as I reclined cogitatively (!) on my chez lounge in my Croatian dacha-style idyll, that the proverbial was about to hit the fan.
Yesterday the Tory shadow-spokesman on immigration, Damian Green MP, had his home(s?) and Westminster office raided by anti-terror police!
Apparently some civil servant had passed on info to him viz the number of illegal immigrants employed in the 'security industry' and the fact that an illegal immigrant was even employed in Westminster.
This further underlines the danger of giving the police "anti-terror" powers, and further underlines the reasons why spooks carry out false flag ops.
If you were a spook boss and you could get the war you want, the funding you "need" and the powers you desire via a few outrages, and if you were corrupt and a bit of a megalomaniac - you might consider it a no-brainer.
Yet again this shames all the politicians - Tories and other Kosher-Cons included - who support the so-called "War on Terror."
In this respect the Tories have no-one to blame but themselves.
And it's time that nationalists woke up to the fact that the real threat comes from the Masonic elite that rules us via big business, parliament, the security services, the banks and the media.
Their bogeymen smokescreen is put up to cover their grasping more powers, and shame on those who play up the scare stories and fake-bogeymen.
They are doing no more than corralling the scared little sheeple into the pens created by the New World Order for our "protection" wherein we will be under their total control.
And those who speak out can expect to be lifted off the streets (like the BNP activists in Liverpool) or have their doors knocked by the goys in blue (like to Tory immigration spokesman).
We are moving towards a police state where we are all kept on files, with our DNA swabbed, ID cards etc. and all some can do is wail on about the CIA-created "Al Qaeda" ghost.
Right. That's me finished. Rant over.
I'm off to read the Protocols again before they are all rounded up (a la Fahrenheit 451) for being anti-Semitic, against "inclusivity" and democracy!
Tory MP Raided - and Cameron's video comment
Friday, 28 November 2008
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
Using BBC i-player anyone in the UK (I think it's limited to UK-usage... "licence-payer" issues etc.) can access some of the "minority" programmes made by the BBC that highlight the history and heritage of these isles.
Two such programmes are Scotland's Clans and Hidden History - broadcast on BBC2 Scotland and BBC2 Wales respectively.
If you co to the BBC Home Page and click on the i-player link, then click on categories, and then on the factual section, you will find these programmes (amidst others listed alphabetically).
Look out especially for Hidden History's programme on the 9th Century ruler of Powys (of Roman descent) who expelled the Saxons and an Iron Age hill fort near Welshpool, and for Scotland's Clans programme on the Stewarts (of Breton descent) - and the Wolf of Baddenoch and his burning down of a Scottish Cathedral.
There are gems out there... you just have search amidst the crud.
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
Tough words today from Mervyn King (right), the governor of the Bank of England.
He said that if banks don't pass on some of the money (billions of tax-payers' money borrowed from the Bank of England at interest!) in loans to businesses, then it will mean tough times and that the nationalisation of banks shouldn't be ruled out!
We couldn't agree more with Merv the Swerve!
The government should start by nationalising the Bank of England!
Just imagine. It could print its own money: no more borrowing at interest.
It would wipe-out the national debt, it would remove most taxation, and that would just be the start.
Or is Merv the Swerve stating that only certain banks can be nationalised? That the private enterprise he works for is somehow sacrosanct? Beyond the reach of the government? That we, the people, have to pay taxes forever so that Merv can claim his whopper wages from the profiteers who charge the government for issuing bits of paper or entries in ledgers?
Those who think the government is right to lower VAT back to 15% should remember a few home truths:
- The Labour opposition jeered when the Tories raised VAT to 17.5% years ago. Yet when they got into power they kept it at 17.5% and racked up lots of hidden taxes too.
- Despite their erstwhile stance in opposition, they will raise VAT once again.
- Despite their clamour over this drop in rates, they acknowledge that taxes will rise to a higher level eventually, to pay back the (ahem!) Bank of England from whom they will borrow (at interest) to shore-up the shortfall in tax revenue.
So whatever way we look at this, we are stuffed.
And all because (to their eternal shame!) no politician - Tory, Labour, Lib, UKIP or BNP* - will ever stand up to the power of the Bank of England.
So, yet again, we see that no politician - not a one! - has the interests of the people first. If they did they would call for the dismantling of a usurious debt system which has seen people lose their jobs, their homes and their very dignity.
In the meantime Merv the swerve has the brass neck to threaten other banks with nationalisation!
Some might call that chutzpah.
But that might be construed as anti-Semitic! ;-)
Mervyn King Warns the Banks
*I mention the BNP because in his Nationalist Truth blog (see link in side panel) councillor Simon Smith says that in a conversation with Nick Griffin, the latter stated that he would keep the banking system as it is. Such is the price of getting media approval (all lodge members supporting each other). I take no pleasure in roping the BNP in with the other system parties because most nationalist groups (whether you agree with them or not) tend to oppose usury and/or the banking system. It is sad if the BNP (and I have no reason to doubt Cllr Smith's account) have transmogrified into a party that supports the most unjust aspect of the system.
Monday, 24 November 2008
Many people consider "9/11" and "7/7" false flag ops, engendered by our own or (allegedly "allied") secret services for geopolitical ends, especially viz Zionist wars, support for Israel etc.
Of course all this is anathema to Neo Cons and their 'useful idiots' for whom support for Israel is sacrosanct and all problems, violence and "anti-democratic" issues stem from Islam.
But there is more, so much more, that points to these kinds of atrocities (for that is what they were and are - innocents die and suffer) being carried out for reasons a lot closer to home.
When the credit crunch truly bit (a crisis with its roots in the naked profiteering of Ron Sandler, an American Jewish financier and conman) no country found itself up a certain creek without a paddle more than Iceland and its banking system, in terms of the amounts it lost compared to its Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
With Iceland's banks having money, securities etc. worth billions in the UK, what was the response of the UK government to this problem facing a friendly country?
The UK government used "anti-terror" legislation to freeze the assets of the Icelanders; an action which caused revulsion in Iceland and had famous Icelanders and their friends (eg the Scottish TV presenter Sally Magnusson, daughter of the famous Icelander and 'Mastermind' presenter Magnus Magnusson) protesting at this injustice and outright slur.
In comparison to the Iceland billions, any alleged "terrorist funds" frozen in the UK were a drop in the ocean.
This shows, yet again, that our traitor politicians use the false flag ops to pass laws to "fight terrorism" that are then actually used for big business interests, for government interests, and to further any objective of our own brand of oligarchs.
if nothing else, the freezing of the assets of Icelandic banks in the UK under "anti-terror" laws has shown us that the government can never be trusted and that when such laws are passed and assurances given ("strict controls" yadda yadda) the assurances aren't worth the Hansard paper they are written on.
So every time a false flag operation happens, when the Neo Cons and the bought n sold tell you to spit venom, remember that their knee-jerk laws (eg. the ID cards they are waiting to bring in) will be used against anyone but "terrorists" - actual, Islamic, Jewish, CIA or otherwise.
With rumours that MI5 operatives within the BNP and the "anti-fascist"movement liaised in releasing the BNP member's details, Nationalists should be more than wary of playing into the hands of those who are totally opposed to nationalism and all it stands for.
Saturday, 22 November 2008
"When I hear an American talk about the dangers of "Islamofascism," I think it's an infallible sign that I am in the presence of either a propagandist, an intellectual coward or a useful idiot."
E. Michael Jones,
intervewed by Martin Vianney,
Was the BNP membership leak the work of MI5?
Apparently a national newspaper thinks so, and if so - it seems to point to MI5 agents high in the BNP and in the "Anti-Racist" movement liaising.
Nationalist Truth on MI5 Role in BNP Leak
Friday, 21 November 2008
It seems the person/people that the BNP is publicly blaming for leaking its membership lists are denying any part in it.
Given they quit the BNP in December 07 and details on the list include donations in 08, it does seem that any membership lists they held wouldn't contain such up to date information.
So why has the BNP publicly lied - instead of trying to track the real (State/red?) source at/near the top of the BNP?
This fiasco and the BNP public response raises more questions than it answers.
As for those claiming that FC is "left wing" or "nazi extremists" as if either (if true!) would stop us having an opinion - no doubt they'd like us to stay quiet, whilst they shriek about "freedom of speech" all the time. Hypocrites!
In the meantime the first policeman on the list (in Merseyside) has been suspended from duty.
Enough is Enough Rebels' Response
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
We have been sent a link to the Blog wherein the membership list is published. As of this evening the BNP has still not had the site closed down.
I would hazard a guess that the site breaks the law viz publishing personal details held on trust by the BNP and therefore those in charge of the BNP and/or its data files would be liable for any action by those listed who lose their jobs or suffer materially or emotionally because of their details being published where anyone (inc "extremists") can abuse them.
The Data Protection Act is a serious piece of legislation designed to safeguard all our personal details after all.
When the government makes a mess like this we all demand heads roll...
To protect all the BNP members listed we will not be publishing the url that was sent as "feedback" to our last post.
Ho ho ho!
We are nearing the season of good cheer.
That must be why a weirdo with some kind of death mask icon gets his knickers in a twist when someone posts news from the FC blog on a new forum:
Canadian Forum on Serb Abortionist
Still, he has a point. Those WP cigarette boxes are great aren't they? Ho ho ho!
Monday, 17 November 2008
Yes - coloured gents bring genuine terror to the streets of London.
Will the coloured chappie responsible be charged with knowingly fulfilling stereotypes in a public place?
Oh what a day for diversity!
What joy for everyone involved in the fight against discrimination!
Londoners will feel relieved and safe on their streets at night, once again.
There's not a day goes past when we all can't be grateful for the gift of millions of non-Europeans brought here against our will -- and the many gifts they bring our society!
Stabbings at O2 "Urban" Awards
First Violence at O2 Arena
"In 2004, a woman was shot outside the Urban Music Awards when it was held at the Barbican Centre in the City of London. "
Sunday, 16 November 2008
A housewife has bad news. Her home has lost much of its income as her husband has been thrown on the dole, because of worrying economic times. She still has some money coming in, from the dole, from money given by her older children, from child benefit and so on: but the income is noticeably lower.
To make matters worse, like so many others, they have debts. They have a sizable mortgage, plus bank loans and credit cards.
So what should she and her family do?
They seem to have three choices:
- Cut back severely and suffer for however long it takes, less food, turning down the heating, a meagre Christmas and New Year.
- Borrow more money, from the banks - primarily on the credit cards (they just had a notice stating their limits have been increased) - hoping that the husband will soon find work and things may improve in the near future when they can pay off the increased minimum payments on the cards.
- Go to the Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) and come to agreements with the banks and credit card companies, freezing the debt, drastically lowering the payments (to a mere fraction of that usually demanded), which may mean going to court to show their reduced income and lack of means to pay. In essence this would be sticking two fingers up to the banks, and they wouldn't be able to borrow in future.
What would you do in that position? Cut back and continue to pay the credit cards? Borrow more and increase the pressure? Or cut up the credit cards, freeze the debt and make your money stretch further?
Now I would say it's (to coin an Americanism) a "no-brainer."
Surely you'd put your family before suffering to pay the banks, or borrowing yet more to accrue the problems for a future date?
Now, let us move that scenario to a political one.
Our government thinks it is preferable to borrow more in this recession. In stead of putting the people first, it is racking up the national debt: it is, in essence, bashing its credit cards to death and we will all have to pay the banks back by the tubful in years to come.
If you saw a housewife buying her food or getting new carpets laid on credit cards when her husband was not long on the dole, wouldn't you take her and shake her and tell her to wake up to reality?
Yet not one MP, not one economics "expert," not one of the media talking heads has the nerve to do likewise to our Chancellor Alistair Darling.
No one has the nerve to stick two fingers up to the banking system - the system responsible for this mess in the first place!
We need politicians (and housewives!) that aren't afraid of the usurers!
We need politicians (and housewives!) that espouse traditional Christian thinking, that view usury as totally wrong, that view the financiers with utter contempt.
We need politicians (and housewives!) that will fight to help create a usury-free banking system.
As has been detailed elsewhere, in the recent world bank and shares collapse, the Islamic banking system (which operates on a non-usury basis) escaped the nightmare.
If we had our own banking system, a Christian banking system (as opposed to a Jewish one!) that negated usury in totalis, then we too would escape these collapses, these taxes and the deadening power that the usurious financiers wield in the fields of economics and politics.
At the moment finding a politician willing to oppose the banking system is a lot harder than trying to find a housewife that will face up to the credit card companies in a county court.
And that is to our eternal shame.
Did this man kill more "Yugoslavs" than the wars of the 1990s?
Another 'champion of abortion' becomes defender of life: the story of Sotjan Adasevic
Madrid, Nov 12, 2008 / 09:21 pm (CNA).- The Spanish daily “La Razon” has published an article on the pro-life conversion of a former “champion of abortion.” Stojan Adasevic, who performed 48,000 abortions, sometimes up to 35 per day, is now the most important pro-life leader in Serbia, after 26 years as the most renowned abortion doctor in the country.
“The medical textbooks of the Communist regime said abortion was simply the removal of a blob of tissue,” the newspaper reported. “Ultrasounds allowing the fetus to be seen did not arrive until the 80s, but they did not change his opinion. Nevertheless, he began to have nightmares.”
In describing his conversion, Adasevic “dreamed about a beautiful field full of children and young people who were playing and laughing, from 4 to 24 years of age, but who ran away from him in fear. A man dressed in a black and white habit stared at him in silence. The dream was repeated each night and he would wake up in a cold sweat. One night he asked the man in black and white who he was. ‘My name is Thomas Aquinas,’ the man in his dream responded. Adasevic, educated in communist schools, had never heard of the Dominican genius saint. He didn’t recognize the name”
“Why don’t you ask me who these children are?” St. Thomas asked Adasevic in his dream.
“They are the ones you killed with your abortions,’ St. Thomas told him.
“Adasevic awoke in amazement and decided not to perform any more abortions,” the article stated.
“That same day a cousin came to the hospital with his four months-pregnant girlfriend, who wanted to get her ninth abortion—something quite frequent in the countries of the Soviet bloc. The doctor agreed. Instead of removing the fetus piece by piece, he decided to chop it up and remove it as a mass. However, the baby’s heart came out still beating. Adasevic realized then that he had killed a human being,”
After this experience, Adasevic “told the hospital he would no longer perform abortions. Never before had a doctor in Communist Yugoslavia refused to do so. They cut his salary in half, fired his daughter from her job, and did not allow his son to enter the university.”
After years of pressure and on the verge of giving up, he had another dream about St. Thomas.
“You are my good friend, keep going,’ the man in black and white told him. Adasevic became involved in the pro-life movement and was able to get Yugoslav television to air the film ‘The Silent Scream,’ by Doctor Bernard Nathanson, two times.”
Adasevic has told his story in magazines and newspapers throughout Eastern Europe. He has returned to the Orthodox faith of his childhood and has studied the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas.
“Influenced by Aristotle, Thomas wrote that human life begins forty days after fertilization,” Adasevic wrote in one article. La Razon commented that Adasevic “suggests that perhaps the saint wanted to make amends for that error.” Today the Serbian doctor continues to fight for the lives of the unborn.
Saturday, 15 November 2008
Friday, 14 November 2008
Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi is the man serving time for the Lockerbie bombing (Pan Am flight 108 in 1988).
Now's not the place, but it has been proven that he nor the Libyan secret service were responsible for the explosion and the deaths.*
Even the body that represents the victim's families says that he is innocent.
So why, given that he has a terminal disease, has the court refused him bail pending his appeal? Or even if you're someone who hates all Arabs, why are UK taxpayers paying to house and feed an innocent man (moreover an innocent man brought here and forced to stay here who just wants to go home)?
Perhaps more importantly (as they say in Oliver Stone's film JFK) isn't the who, but the why.
In 1988 Libya was the equivalent of post-911 Afghanistan, or the Iraq of Saddam. In other words it was the whipping boy of World Zionism. I suppose that's why NF leaders went to Tripoli to try and build support for radical nationalist ideas and anti-Zionism.
So it suited the Spooks of the day, the Neo Cons and Israel Firsters - the Zionist Lobby in America especially - to push the lie that Libya was involved (as they tried to blame Iraq for "911" afterwards.
So Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi became a pawn in the struggle of the Zionists to paint Libya as a terrorist nation when it was the Zionists who launched air strikes on Libya and it was later revealed that MI6 backed Muslim extremists (eh? get a load of that you Neo Con trolls!) who tried to kill Qaddafi and only succeeded in killing innocents (twas ever thus).
So when our Zionist government talks of "state sponsored terrorism" be sure they recall their exploits in Libya and their "Islamicist" allies.
In light of which we can only assume that the efforts to keep Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi locked up, despite his condition, is an attempt to desperately cover-up the truth for as long as possible.
Would our Spooks, our Neo Cons and our Israel Firsters really be so shallow? You bet!
You watch the flak this blog gets for mentioning such unflattering truths.
The people who favour The Talmud and similar anti-Christian, anti-White filth will accuse us of being "pro-Muslim" despite what I've revealed of MI6's terrorist allies.
The people who think Jews are "patriotic Brits" or that Africans here "legally" can be proud members of our very families, or that Sikhs and Hindus make natural allies will accuse us of being "pro-Arab."
Sad but true.
Perhaps when Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi is free and repatriated from Scotland where he is kept at great expense to the tax-payer then the Neo Cons and their useful idiots can cast their nets further afield?
Perish the thought they should ever point the finger at Israel. Utterly unthinkable! Ask the crew of the USS Liberty...
* For full details on the Lockerbie Pan Am disaster and the innocence of Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi read Private Eye's special report - still available to buy (see link below).
BBC on Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi's bail refusal
Private Eye's Lockerbie Special
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
Another great piece from the Nationalist Truth Blog.
Nationalists must start to look beyond the accepted media norms, whether it's Global Warming, 911, the Holohoax, the US Civil War or the Spanish Inquisition.
Link: Hoaxes, Einstein, David Bellamy & Political Correctness
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
Whilst planning your Christmas gifts this year (and remember it's not just a materialist free for all!) why not avoid a few of the Cohens (sorry Tescos), Sainsburys, Marks & Spencers, British Home Stores and other Zionist owned mega-stores.
You might be surprised at the range of items FC has - not just Nationalist, TP, RAC and similar items.
We also have generally 'patriotic' items, cultural items, historical items, even some fun and quirky items.
So if you're after a gift for a friend or relative - why not check out our store?
You might be pleasantly surprised.
Supporters with websites, newsletters, brochures, e-zines and similar can feel free to copy and paste either of the above images into their material to use as they see fit. Thanks.
She's at it again!
If I said someone was beating the Israeli drum in the print media you'd probably guess right off that I'm on about the arch-Zionist Melanie Phillips (pictured right).
In yesterday's Daily Mail, "Mad Mel" as she is (non)affectionately known was screeching like a Zionist banshee because Gordon Brown had visited the Saudis to seek an answer, or rather a financial bail-out, to the banking crisis.
She wails on and on about the Saudis exporting "Islamofascism" via their particular breed of Islam and how Gordon Brown underestimates the threat be going there, reinforcing the 'acceptability' of the Saudi regime and so on and so forth.
There's an old lie about Hitler which describes him as a 'carpet muncher' because he's flail about on the floor in a rage. Yes, the usual Soviet-style Hollywood claptrap devoid of serious historical study and debate... but on reading Mad Mel you can quite believe that this kind of carpet munching (not the 'Brighton variety') goes on in the offices of the Daily Mail as the Arch Zionist prepares her diatribe.
So let's look at Mad Mel's latest offering which would have been lapped up by all Neo Cons, Israel Firsters, Kosher Tories, NuBNPers, Judeo-Masons, Zionists and all their fellow travellers and useful idiots.
Mad Mel thinks the "credit crunch" et al has reached a dangerous juncture because this will allow the Saudis to get yet another finger in yet another pie, and the Saudis are - of course - mad mullahs, Islamofascists and emissaries for the new caliphate!
Does anyone else get a glimpse of Israeli foreign policy here? A spot of jealousy from the country that demands all "Western countries" put its interests ahead of any others!
Of course we can't turn to Israel for help - because the country runs at a loss and is notoriously corrupt. If it weren't for American and other bank-rolling, Israel couldn't possibly exist. It would be a financial disaster!
Now no-one in their right-mind could possibly find the Saudi regime acceptable in and of itself, if only for its nepotistic dictatorship. However, when nations deal with China and Israel (murderers inc.) why should we be surprised they turn to Saudi Arabia?
What Mel won't tell you of course is that the Judeo-Masons have caused the whole economic recession. The roots of it were the selling of mortgages to Americans who couldn't afford them by one Ron Sandler (see my posts on that Zionist con man!) and the whole bunch of financiers from shyster mortgage sellers to the big Wall Street banks all let their greed get the better of them (thus fulfilling so many stereotypes as to warm the cockles of any sincere "anti-Semite.") and we've all suffered the consequences.
What Mel also won't tell you ("What! Could she be so insincere?" you cry!) is that the Islamic banking system -- which is loosely similar to what traditional Christianity espouses: i.e. that banking should be usury-free -- hardly suffered from the domino effect of the banks collapsing throughout the Capitalist world.
Mel, presumably, doesn't want you to know who runs the banks, why and how they run the banks, nor that there is a form of usury-free banking that wouldn't suffer from boom and bust, wouldn't strangle people with never-ending debt etc. etc.
Nor does Mel find it outrageous when the UK borrows money at interest from one bunch of alien financiers so we can bail-out another bunch of alien financiers.
Some say that Jews were unfairly painted as Usurers and Coin-Clippers in the Middle Ages.
Some say Jews are unfairly pointed at as playing a pivotal role in the sub-prime mortgage business, in financier-banking and in international banking generally.
Some say that Medieval man believed the earth was flat (hint: they never did!).
Some say whatever they think we need to hear in order to cover the tracks of the biggest con-men in history.
But let's get back to Mad Carpet Munching Mel (oh must we....?).
Why does she rail against the Saudis so? yes, yes - we have all the surface reasons, but let's dig a little deeper.
The Saudis are one of America's strongest allies. The Saudis are loathed by "Islamic terrorists" for that very reason. The Saudis have huge business interests in America. And as the leftist agitator Michael Moore has documented, the links between the Saudis (even the Bin Ladens) and Neo Cons like the Bush family cannot be denied.
So what has led Mad Mel to launch this broadside against such an ally of the American and British regimes? An avowed target of the "Islamic extremists?"
I can only conclude that it is a way to throw up a semi-false "moral outrage" at Saudi (read "Islamicist") involvement so as to throw up a fog around the Zionist involvement in the whole debacle from its old roots to its recent flowering (if that can be an apt word - unless there is a flower with the nomenclature of s##tweed!).
Unless of course Mad Carpet Munching Mel is so tied-in with Israel and its black ops and psychological warfare in the UK, that she needs to formulate the jealousy of the Terrorist Bandit Zionist State in a column that uses the 'fear of nightmares' and "islamofascist" bogeymen to try and pooh pooh yet another multi-billion pound business deal between the UK and the Saudis.
Perhaps the truth lies somewhere between, or perhaps the lies truly nestle in both reasonings?
Perhaps only Mad Mel and her handler know the truth about the lies.
Meanwhile the Neo Cons, Israel Firsters, Kosher Tories, NuBNPers, Judeo-Masons, Zionists and all their fellow travellers and useful idiots will be toasting this diatribe from Carpet-Muncher-Phillips as "incisive" and a poke in the eye for "political correctness" blinded to the real agenda of the spooks and their operatives.
'Twas ever thus, of course.
Meanwhile the real terrorists - the Iluminati, the bankers, the Judeo-Masons - continue to throw millions into poverty, wage-slavery, needless wars and false flag terrorism.
Still, why look the hideous facts of the recession in the face when we can all wail at the visage of the Mossad/CIA "islamofascist" bogeymen, all conjured up by Mad Mel and the other Mossad supporting/employed journalists.
Sunday, 9 November 2008
Which is the lesser of two evils?
Obama (Black Liberal)
McCain (White 'Neo Con')
It's so irrelevant as Israel runs America
There was a noticeable bounce after the election - a few more voting for McCain, but the overall feel was that people recognised it matters not a jot
Saturday, 8 November 2008
The BNP leaders, activists and members need to read this!
Where does the threat come from?
Right: Who runs our government, who runs the big businesses, who runs the banking system, who runs the media? Here the permatanned ex-petty terrorist Peter Hain prostrates himself as he celebrates Cohens (sorry.... Tescos) create more shelf-stacking jobs: jobs he would never contemplate doing.
Who controls the State that enacts so many anti-national, anti-freedom and anti-Christian laws emanate from?
Who puts its emissaries in political parties - including NATIONALIST ones - thus reducing democracy to Tweedledum and tweedledummer politics?
Hint: it ain't "the muzzies."
Now wake up and smell the coffee before you too stoop to kiss the bloody boots of a murderous and treacherous system.
The Zionists Control Britain
Friday, 7 November 2008
"We reject the Capitalist system, which disregards the needs of the people, dehumanizes private property, and transforms the workers into shapeless masses that are prone to misery and despair. Our spiritual and national awareness likewise repudiates Marxism. We shall channel the drive of the working classes, that are nowadays led astray by Marxism, by demanding their direct participation in the formidable task of the national State."
Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera,
Falange Manifesto, 1934.
Jose Antonio poster
Thursday, 6 November 2008
I've been watching the 'Tonight' special report on ITV featuring the Duchess of York and her daughters visiting orphanages in Turkey and Romania.
Right: It's horrible, it's barbaric, it's abusive, it's shocking, it's the ultimate rejection of the innocence of childhood and the blessing that is each new life. Yet there's no 'Shock and Awe' documentary exposing this abuse.
On the Turkish footage we are reminded that the country is all but Third World and its Asiatic moral codes don't deserve to be held up as 'European.'
On the Romanian footage - the orphanages were appalling, but it's the "gypsy village" I'd like to comment on. The outwardly poor looking gypsies were all well-fed and as two of the women spoke - one old one young - they could not hide they had a few gold teeth each.
Is that poverty? Gold teeth don't come cheap in a relatively poorer country with no NHS.
I felt like the Asiatic gypsies were involved in a con job -- i.e. "quick, here come the rich foreignors. Everyone say how poor we are and how we'll give up our children to the orphanages because we are so poor."
Hey presto the mega-rich Duchess said she'd give £200,000 to the village from her charity.
Whilst I do think it admirable for those blessed with position and wealth to help those unfortunate souls in the orphanages, the whole gypsy set-up just felt like a con from start to finish.
We all know how easy it is to con money out of the idle rich by tugging at their heart strings.
When I visited Romania some years ago I witnessed the Asiatic gypsies begging in the streets of the towns and cities, some of whom had had their legs broken by their own families and/or people just so they could garner more donations.
The Romanian nationalists I was staying with showed me the Asiatic Gypsy Mafia's Mercedes cars travelling around and explained how they would pick-up the beggars at the end of their day's work.
As a last thought as I considered the possible thousands of children suffering and neglected in Turkey and Romania (perhaps by families who couldn't cope, or didn't want the "hassle" or simply wanted to save money or keep their 'careers') I couldn't help but think what utter hypocrites we are.
Here in the UK we have murdered circa 6,000,000 babies since the Abortion Act was passed in 1967.
How many were killed via the excuses of "poverty" or "careers" etc. etc. Yet we live in better conditions than many of the families in Turkey or Romania that put their children in the orphanages.
How many in the Duchess of York's social circles have killed their little boys and little girls just so their career doesn't suffer a setback? Or so they can continue their two cars and two holidays a year lifestyle?
Christ famously said we should take the log from our own eye before seeing the splinter in others.
Somehow I can't help but think the Turks and Romanians could well be sitting in their homes discussing how an advanced, relatively rich and prosperous, and allegedly Christian state, such as the UK could kill 6 million of its own people in circa 40 years.
Perhaps the Duchess will make a film showing the mums being frogmarched into the abortuaries by their "partners" or parents; or the skiing holiday elite discussing the number of abortions they've had; or the businesswomen who've had abortions; or the poor who might otherwise be helped who've felt forced into carrying out abortions; or the "doctors" who have made huge fortunes by killing helpless babies; or the "charities" and pressure groups who promote abortion and also make huge amounts of cash through providing abortions!
But don't hold your breath dear reader.
It's OK to make films about "dusky" people who dump their children in orphanages by the dozens; but not to show us - the advanced, intelligent, Christian, Western, well-off consumers - churning our children into a bloody mess by the million!
The Turks and Asiatic Gypsies might well point the finger at us and say:
PHYSICIAN, HEAL THYSELF!
As our stalwart reader and regular comment-leaver 'Behind Blue Eyes' stated in his comment to our last post re. "Obama the Zionist:"
"he makes Rahm Emanuel his first appointment as Chief of Staff. He is the son of a Jewish terrorist and some have said he is the head of MOSSAD in America."
Right: The Greater Israel as fought for by Emanuel's Irgun terrorist father. Why is it sons of - and current - Commies and Zionists are so acceptable? Is it because these cults of murder, repression and suffering are both Jewish?
We hate to say "we told you so" but... erm... we told you so!
Democrat or Republican, Labour or Tory, Left or Right.
Organised Judeo-Masonry has its stodgy little fingers in many pies. Democracy doesn't give us any freedom, because all the parties are bought and sold, the media is slanted, the money flows in pre-ordained ways, it's a closed shop my friends!
Anyone who tells you different is an idiot or an agent of those powers.
Talking of which... let's see if the Neo Con's Useful Idiots, the Israel-Firsters and the proponents of the "Islamofascist" power of nightmares theories pick up on this appointment and the fact that yet another American government is under the thumb of a tiny coterie of Judeo-Masons?
But let's look at America and Obama's "Change" promises.
Can we expect yet more war, more power to the state, more power to the banks, more pro-faggot and pro-abortion laws?
Welcome to the New World Order.
Kikipedia on Rahm Emanuel
Son of a Terrorist
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
So Obama is in.
Right: Both candidates were Zionists (seen here addressing the Zionist AIPAC lobbying group), just as last time (Bush v Kerry) both were Masonic 'Bonesmen.' Democracy is a circus played out for the public while the real power rests with those who create and control money and the lobby that dictates American policy.
America has its first mulatto president!
We've had 8 years of Neo Con war mongering.
No we have at least 4 years of multi-culti abortionist gay-rights liberalism.
Of one thing we can be 99.9% sure: the Masonic agenda will advance.
As with the UK, we see swings from "left" to "right" and vice versa... yet the immoral liberalising agenda, the State control laws, the internationalism and (needless to add!) the Israel First policies will continue.
America will continue along its bankrupt path (economically, politically and morally).
Because the same Judeo-Masonic elite, the same banksters, and the same Big Business bosses rule the roost no matter who the figurehead is.
And that's democracy!
Bread and circuses anyone?
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
...if it was ever meant to be serious?
Apparently BBC News 24 interrupted its broadcast to "newsflash" that UKIP had denied the BNP an electoral pact for the Euro Elections!
Right: Nigel Farage MEP, the leader of UKIP, beloved of the media. Many allege the well-paid MEP is a state-operative. Meanwhile Nick Griffin the BNP leader is different because... he's not on the EU gravy train.
Could his desire for a shoe-in be behind the failed approach to the group the BNP labeled UKRAP?
Am I the only one to find it highly amusing that the BNP approached UKIP? They have long wailed that UKIP are a "state pressure valve" (pot? kettle?) yet they go running to UKIP like this?
Is the truth that UKIP always out-vote the BNP in the Euro Elections (after all, it's UKIP's natural hunting ground) just as the BNP always out-votes UKIP on a local election level. It's horses for courses.
Of course, the difference is that MEPs get huge wonga whereas councilors get a relative pittance (that is highly comparative for any bank pen-pusher about to become dole-ite looking in!) - and that MEPs get a golden handshake 'pension for life.'
No! It couldn't be?
Are you thinking that the BNP's No. 1 agenda is the acquisition of wonga for the top listed person in their prefered Euro-region? How cynical!
As ex-BNP Councilor Simon Smith states on his brilliant Nationalist Truth Blog:
The BNP/UKIP pact - Big deal. Why haven't the BBC and the rest covered the BNP's internal elections or the "December Rebels ?" What is the agenda ? Perhaps the Establishment would like to engineer a UKIP/BNP type merger ? Just speculating. Ex UKIP Cllr Chris Cooke who has commented on UKIP has said that a couple of government operatives were discovered as such by a privately hired detective and yet still continued to work in UKIP's administration department ! Perhaps a merger would cut down the number of MI5 types necessary and lead to cost cutting that would lesson the requirement for 5IMon Darby types !? :-) Truth is , I don't know why the BNP/UKIP was mentioned - but there is a "News" management agenda here.
With 5IMon Darby having come from the state-infested National Democrats and the Eurosceptic groups run-through with spooks and their operatives we have to look askew at the current lot of "right wing" parties (because they are right wing - not nationalist) as a rum bunch shot through with state policies and state operatives.
Nationalist Truth on news management
Well done to H.M. Government!
In protecting their chums at the top of the banking industry they are - by pushing through the merger of Lloyds-TSB and Halifax-Bank of Scotland (in essence turning what used to be four banks into one!) - ensuring that circa 20,000 people get thrown on the dole.
Right: How can a system exist wherein young able men are paid not to work? We should be fighting to bring about a worldview wherein work is a vocation, either in guild-organised trades or via family farms and small co-operative businesses. The wiping out of usury will also end the "boom and bust" of Capitalism and return us to just wages and fair prices.
If they were all hedge fund managers, top brass, investment bankers etc. etc. no-one would shed a tear.
But in a deal drawn up by the government and the banks you and I know that it's the pen-pushers and gofers that will face the chop.
Aren't the 20,000 lucky that the government cares enough to ensure that the greedy incompetents at the top of the banks - who helped make the recession even worse - keep their posts?
In any other industry you'd like to think (perhaps naively) that running up billions in debts or forcing your firm to merge with a competitor through incompetence would mean the end of the road for the bosses!
Not so for the bankers!
They get money (that the government borrowed from... er... a bank!!!!!) poured into them to prop them up.
Would the government do that with British Rail to ensure the country's infrastructure remains up-to-date and free of profiteers? Er... no.
Would the government do that with British Coal to keep hundreds of thousands of workingmen employed? Or whole communities running properly? Or our fuel supply secure? Er... no.
But what of the ship building industry in Glasgow, Belfast, the North East etc.? Er... no.
Yet they suddenly find they can borrow what will amount to hundreds of billions to bale out a system that bleeds us all dry for the profit of a handful of mega-rich leeches, many of whom have no loyalty to this country (and all of whom employ tax-dodging scams to pay as little tax as possible such is their gratitude!).
Left: The "cattle" queue for free hand outs in the era of the Empire State Building! Capitalism has always been and will always be a scandal: and an organised scandal for the gross enrichment of a handful of mega rich Freemasons.
No, dear reader, when it comes to the bankster elite, when it comes to the international financiers, when it comes to the freemasons... er, I mean the bank bosses (as Saunders Lewis wrote, with their "Hebrew Snouts" in ledgers) the government will think nothing of letting 20,000 people face the dole (just before Christmas! Ho ho ho!) at a time when jobs are drying up and when mortgages are getting more expensive (as banks try to claw back profits).
So let me get this straight:
The banks get a bail-out and merge: the government pays.
A pen-pusher (x 20,000!) gets the sack: the banks profit.
A pen-pusher gets put on the dole: the government pays his dole.
A pen-pusher can't afford his mortgage: the bank repossess to get money.
A pen-pusher gets 'social housing': the government pays for his housing benefit.
When the government runs low of funds it raises taxes and borrows more... from the banks!
Anyone spot the pattern?
The banks profit.
The tax-payer pays.
How cosy and intimate those meetings of the top honchos must be in the Masonic lodges!
The Talmud is right in that regard. They are right to treat us as cattle! Because that is what we are, that is how we behave - and they "milk" us of taxes on a regular basis! Not to mention those who get sent to slaughter (in abortuaries... in Afghanistan... etc.) and even then they profit. Abortion is a big business and their wars benefit Israel!
I wrote some time back about housing conditions in Manchester and other English cities in the 19th Century.
Our people back then lived as slaves (yes: they were White and they were slaves, to borrow from Michael Hoffman). Housing conditions were awful, with whole families living in squalid, damp basements with no natural light.
Some worked in factories for a meagre wage, in appalling conditions, forced to buy from the 'factory shop' where, for example, bread was cheapened with wood shavings and was expensive to buy.
Others were forced into workhouses. Some children were forced to work for (appalling!) bed and lodge from the earliest age for 12 plus hours a day.
This is what happens when you de-Christianise a nation. This is what happens when the Masonic elite run things for their profit and fail to see that we are all made in the image of God. They view us as cattle, to be thrown out when we go lame. We are just cogs in their money-making machinery.
That is what the British Empire was built on! The suffering of our own people. We were slaves. They made gargantuan profits. They even ran huge drug pushing operations. All the pomp and glory was a backdrop to the worst housing and work conditions imaginable.
No wonder British workers (in the depression hit 1930s: Jarrow March etc.) looked to Fascist Italy with wonder when they realised that workers - the people - were treated as human beings. And this, unlike the Communist East was a land with no mass murder, collectivisation or gulags. But I digress...
From the land-grab of the Reformation, to the enclosure of the fields, to the industrial revolution with the creation of city slums... the Masonic elite has viewed us all as mere cattle to fill their factories and earn them mega-bucks ("the root of all evil").
How much has changed?
the cattle have better conditions to stop them from charging the fences, but we are still taxed, mortgaged and sent to work for the Masonic bosses who sit on their yachts (off Corfu, for example) swigging champers and plotting to make more money (by, for example, buying up Montenegro's aluminium industry for peanuts by liaising with the mafia that run that "government" allegedly with the help of an EU commissar).
Do you think the workers in the Montenegran aluminium plants enjoy good working conditions? Yet they work to enrich a millionaire with Rothschilds connections.
How many of the factory owners, or the owners of the "dark Satanic mills" of England had Rothschild connections?
How many of the EU commissars who are planning our enslavement to a Europe-wide Socialist regime have Rothschild connections?
How many of the banksters growing rich today as they take the world to the brink of meltdown through their greed and corruption have Rothschild connections?
The scenery changes - but the story remains the same.
This morning a journal plopped (yes, plopped!) through my letterbox and in it I found an interesting letter from a priest. Rather than worry about the stocks and shares that some prelates think it is their "duty" to invest in, there were a few juicy bits, so let me quote from the end of his letter after he sets the scene of the global economic crash:
"For years we have been told that each family's "wealth" was its home, but no one seems to have stopped to consider the fact that that same belongs to only very few families -- the rest are firmly in the hands of bankers for 20 or 30 years. "If you are good and pay for your house three times over, you can keep it at the end of that time." The injustice in the system (among others) is that one who is usually a wage slave may pay on his home for twenty years. The wealth is fictitious, or for the future at best. However, we spend it all now...
"We live in an economy of unrestrained greed and consumption and it would seem that this logic will soon boomerang back on us... it is immoral to live beyond ones means. It is a question of justice, commutative justice... Those who live continually above their means (by credit card juggling) live in a permanent state of sin. Little do we ever think of this. The opportunistic mortgage companies and banks have only greedily profited from the consumerist lives of many.
"Only when we see clearly the decadence of a system inspired by profit and greed will we ever be able to begin to change our community's organisation: this is the sense of "economy" -- the organisation of our "house". Oikos in Greek.
"May your lives be holy, noble, simple, and infused with peace,
Now there's a man who would happily turn over the tables of the moneylenders in the temple!
Sunday, 2 November 2008
Under the heading "Red Kim Repents" the BBC's Westminster Diary reports that Kim Howells MP (ex-CPGB member known as Kim Il Sung) is now in charge of watching the spooks, via being the chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee.
Right: Comrade Kim dreams of what might have been as he's surrounded by South American troops.
Would an ex-Mosleyite or National Front member be allowed within a mile of such a job, let alone a government ministerial post?
Yet those who supported Communism, Stalinism, Trotskyism and more are allowed in government (one thinks of Mandelson and Reid who held the reins of power under Blair - of course "Mandy" is now back and embroiled with Jewish financiers...)
Circa 1990 the TP group the Welsh Distributist Movement put out a leaflet condemning Howells under the title "Zionist of the Valleys" after the MP used a Welsh newspaper column to defend Israel's terrorist activities.
It seems that by then he was seeing where the shekels lay.
Isn't it stomach-churning when you witness someone who cut their teeth in a group opposed to Zionism then jump ship for position, power, prestige and the filthy lucre?
Kim Howells should be strung up from a lamppost. Not for being a Communist, because you can't condemn people for being stupid or gullible. Nor for changing, because some people do see the light and change their ways (e.g. ex-Communists Douglas Hyde or Hamish Fraser) but for being a turncoat, for being an opportunist, for selling out his beliefs and for trying to make money and gain position out of supporting everything he once said he loathed (the banking system, a pro-Zionist government, the spooks etc.).
Thank goodness there's been no-one like that from the nationalist side... erm... er... ;-)
Beeb's Westminster Diary
Today is All Souls Day when Christians - Anglicans and Catholics and some Protestants - remember the dead that have gone on before them by praying for them.
Orthodox ("Eastern") Christians have their own days when they pray for the dead.
All Souls Day follows All Saints Day (1st November) and whilst All Saints Day helps remind us that the Church comprises of the Communion of Saints, All Souls Day helps remind us that we have our failings and it is efficacious to pray for the souls of the dead so that they may (as Christians have asked for their deceased family and friends for millennia) finally Rest in Peace - i.e. enter Heaven.
Following the Hollywood antics of Hallowe'en, it is right to remember the feasts of our forefathers throughout Europe and to not forget our dead ancestors on All Souls Day.
It also reminds me of when GK Chesterton wrote, in Orthodoxy, that democracy disenfranchises our ancestors:
"Tradition means giving a vote to most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead."
Chesterton goes on to say:
"Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our father."
Which is why we should always remember, in an age of seemingly endless automatons, TV-braindead, multi-culti morons, mammon worshippers and reds of every shade (blood red Marxist to homo-pink), that the weight of history and the strength of our forefathers is for Tradition (aka Faith, Family, Nation).
BBC on All Souls Day
Wikipedia on All Souls Day
"Who cares?" - is probably your first response to this entry in this blog.
Ross and Brand have been chastised by the Beeb (the former on 3 months unpaid leave, the latter's resigned) and even the Radio 2 controller has resigned.
All for a series of phone calls wherein messages were left on Andrew Sach's answer machine that Brand had engaged in "Ugandan discussions" with Sach's granddaughter.
Right: The "innocent child" at the centre of the BBC brouhaha is a Satanic Slut!
Almost 30,000 people complained.
My take on this is that the two are degenerates. Brand is a druggy sex-addict who often holds up his (former?) days of drug taking as something to be cheered on, as if he were some sort of role model. Ross himself is just a potty-mouthed buffoon who constantly promotes homosexuality.
It would be interesting to find out more about Brand, but the main players in this seem to be Jewish (imagine the uproar on Neo Con sites and forums if they were "muzzies?").
Ross himself is married to a Jewess, so his children are (according to the rabbis) legally Jewish. Sachs (the aggrieved party) is a Jew and therefore his granddaughter (whom Brand said he was involved with) can be assumed to be Jewish.
Remember she is the "erotic dancer" in a troupe called Satanic Sluts who has now sold her sordid story (including information on her sexual proclivities) to the News of the World newspaper.
So much for her grandfather's hurt feelings... So much for her right of privacy! The Satanic Slut's chance for a few shekels must have overridden her concerns to protect her granddad from further hurt!!!
Even the week before the offending Russel Brand show his guest was David Baddiel, a Jewish comedian.
At this stage the Neo Cons, Israel-Firsters and Kosher Tories will be tut tutting, pointing a finger and righting this off as extremism. But let me ask again, what would their response be if there were a 'Muslim' thread running throughout this story in which filth on a Talmudic level rears its ugly head?
But to get back to the facts of the story, it's clear that most of the 30K complainants didn't hear the programme and are just using it as a brickbat to bash the BBC with.
Good luck to them!
The BBC has got away with a lot of filth for years. Ross's Friday Night show was interlaced with filth. On the Brand show in question there were far worse moments (including performing cunnilingus on an orange!) all of which was treated with titters and guffaws like two privately educated schoolboys in their dorm room!
People have had enough of this puerile (dare I say?) Talmudic filth. The way these people talk about drugs as if its "sugar candy" and not substances that are ruining our (working class) communities, wrecking families, and producing burglaries and other crimes that damage lives.
Little Britain is another show that the BBC shouldn't touch with a bargepole. Admittedly it is funny in parts, but the constant (and I mean constant!) going on and on (and on!) about homosexuality to the point of distraction says more about the mental state of the presenters than anything else.
Matt Lucas, one of the Little Britain "stars" recently got "divorced" from his 'Civil Partner' of a relative handful of months (oh yes: they made a 'lifetime commitment' dontcha know) showing what a mess his life is, and this is mirrored in his "entertainment" offerings.
E Michael Jones has written a book (which I've just bought, but haven't read yet) that shows how the modern form of architecture (eg Bauhaus) is a reflection of the sexual proclivities and basically messed-up lives of degenerates (it's a theme he returns to on a wider scale in his tome Degenerate Moderns).
So can we say in truth that the filth, degeneracy, promotion of drugs and homosexuality etc. etc. in so many BBC programmes (not just the ones listed above) aren't the product of the degenerate nature of the "artistes" and producers responsible?
That is the only logical conclusion - and certainly the likes of Brand, Ross and Lucas would seem to bear this out.
We have to ask if promoting sexual perversion, extolling homosexuality and glamorising drugs are things that we want our children and grandchildren watching and/or listening to.
If you, dear reader, aren't that bothered then I'm afraid that you are, in part, responsible for the downward spiral of this nation and of the corruption of our standards.
We cannot dodge the bullet. We cannot (always!) point the finger at others and blame them.
We have to take some personal responsibility. We have to set standards - in our own lives and in the lives of our families.
By happy chance (in life's erratic tombola) I sat on the tube (London Underground train) opposite Matt Lucas not so long ago. He was a nervous, fidgety, twitchy, self-conscious person. If he was just a "bloke on the street" you'd think there was "something wrong with him" or "he's a bit weird" -- in light of his personal life and his televisual offerings this seems to be perfectly true.
The BBC belongs to all of us.
The BBC won't allow revisionist, nationalist, traditionalist voices on. Only in very rare cases will they even allow Pro-Life (anti abortion) or Pro-family (anti-homosexual) voices on: and then in heavily edited and often slanted soundbytes.
So to allow Brand, Ross, Lucas et al on the grounds of "freedom of speech" just doesn't wash because so much which the Zionists, Multi-Cultis, Pooftahs and Reds who populate the BBC find "offensive" doesn't get aired and is edited out of existence.
It is about time that the 'degenerate moderns' were hounded out, and if takes the "excuse" of an affronted 'Satanic Slut' then so be it!
For further links between groups who promote Satanism and Judaism read FC's SATANISM AND ITS ALLIES - THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT UNDER ATTACK book.
If you think the Satanic Sluts is just harmless "fun" then think again. Their site is full of Satanic imagery, they even use the slogan "Blood and Dishonour" (pure chance eh?). They also use a perversion of the National Socialist slogan by saying: "One Faith, One Creed, One Order, 666."
Why is it that these Satanist groups ape National Socialism, very much in a Hollywood style, yet contain more than a sprinkling of Jews? Is it because they seek to paint all nationalism as "weird" and dysfunctional?
A basic study of Anton le Vey's (another Jew!) Church of Satan will show you that they (throughout their history) have used "cultural" means to promote Satanism. This includes music, sexual material etc.
The 'Satanic Sluts' fill their modus operandi perfectly.
They offer the "Do What Thou Wilt" creed of Aleister Crowley to the Nth degree, as do Brand, Ross and Lucas.
Homosexuality, Drugs and Perversion were, after all, grist to the mill of Crowley, Le Vey and any other Satanist creep worth his salt.
Satanism and its Allies
Saturday, 1 November 2008
"Economically [Austria] will resemble to a great extent the Fascist Corporative State of Signor Mussolini. Its spirit will derive from the interpretation of Pope Pius XI, in his Encyclical of May, 1931, Quadragesimo Anno, in which the principle of private ownership is acknowledged, but the right of the State to intervene 'for the common good' is also admitted. Liberal parliamentarism is to disappear for good; industrial disputes prevented by the substitution of corporations [guilds] for the existing trade unions and employers' federations; and all political parties are eventually to be suppressed..."
C. F. Melville,
20th September 1933.
Above Right: Engelbert Dolfuss, the leader of Fascist Austria.