Friday, 26 June 2009

London, July 4th, NF Anti-Homosexual Demo


The Mayor of London -- bonkin' Boris -- joins the homosexual lobby. Circa 0.4% of the population may have homosexual tendencies, but that doesn't mean we should all be held hostage by a degenerate minority any more than we should let psychotic people run government. Can we expect any elected representatives to join the anti-homosexual demo or at least publicly support it? Or -- like Boris -- are they too interested in positive headlines?

Our Comrades in the National Front are organising a counter demo to London "Gay Pride" on Saturday the 4th of July.

We would urge all nationalists, patriots and folk of good will to join the NF demo against the degenerate forces backed by this sterile and foetid government/system.

In the past the homosexuals and their allies have tried to use heavy handed tactics against the nationalists whilst the forces of "law n order" look on (just as they ignore the obscene behaviour and dress of the militant faggots - despite the laws of the land).

As such it is vital that everyone, at least in the Greater London region, should support this NF demo and get along there to show London and the whole of England that plenty of people are opposed to the cancer that is the militant, anti-family, homosexual lobby.

Please spread the word and do your best to attend.

If you would like to attend please phone the NF organiser on:

07849 748605.

Bad/Funny Michael Jackson Jokes

Please feel free to add your Michael Jackson jokes.

here's a few to get you started:

It's a conspiracy that Michael Jackson died of a heart attack.
Apparently the truth is that he had a stroke at a children's hospital.

Michael Jackson's London dates have been cancelled.
Daniel aged 9, Robert aged 7, Carl Aged 6... etc.

In honour of Michael Jackson they are bringing out a range of bendy toy figures.
A spokesman for Touch-Up Toys said "It's now time for the kids to play with him!"

Sir Martin Gilbert: Court Historian Chosen to Whitewash Iraq War?

Martin Gilbert is what is known as a "court historian."

He is the state's preferred choice.

Left: Martin Gilbert's panoply (in every sense of the word!) of books have made him a lot of money and given him great prestige from a war-mongering and corrupt state. He is the chosen historian of all Zionist politicians. This is just one of his many books on the holocaust (what an unhealthy obsession!). All roads lead to Tel Aviv!

His history of Israel -- quelle surprise! -- is biased. His book 'The Holocaust' is meant to be a definitive tome. Meanwhile his Churchill history is in stark contrast to the ugly truth.

The knighted Gilbert is reaping his reward for years of service to a Zionist state.

Some point to the fact that unlike expelled Palestinians, who have been forced out of their homes and off their land, Gilbert has the "Right of Return" to 'Israel.'

Now he sits on the official British government Inquiry into the Iraq War.

What a bloody farce - by that I mean the inquiry, not the lies before, nor the execution of the war.

Blair and Bush may be hoping that a few hand-picked ninnies and marionettes will airbrush out the known lies...

I can only hope public clamour and a few good men in the right circles will ensure some degree (!) of truth comes out about the Zionist, butchering and false nature of the "intelligence" presented, the war itself and the slice-up of Iraq for the various vested interests.

Mr. Gilbert notwithstanding.

Time will tell.

Gilbert's Israeli Book
Gilbert's Falsification of History

Sign Iraq Enquiry Petition

Petition for Iraq War Inquiry to be held in public:

Iraq Petition

Last Week's Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Thieves and Property

One for our politicians:

"Thieves respect property. They merely wish the property to become their property that they may more perfectly respect it."

G.K. Chesterton
The Man Who Was Thursday.

Wacko Jacko the Whitened-Black Kiddie Fiddler

There's a bloke down the road looking glum, wearing a white armband.

Right: Michael Jackson picking his nose.

Yes, apparently last night Michael Jackson died.

Many say he was a "troubled" soul. But here's a man who settled out of court for £Millions in a child abuse allegation.

If you are innocent you would always fight any such allegation to the end, vehemently fighting your corner.

To 'settle out of court' is to all but admit guilt. It's what big businesses do to avoid bigger fines and brain-deadening court costs.

Anyhoo, with all this I'm always reminded of Christ's words that He will 'come back like a thief in the night.'

In other words, none of us will know when we will be called to meet our maker, and for someone who tried to bleach his god-given skin and de-Africanise (zoiks!) his appearance, I'd wager St Peter will have a stern look on his face if Mr. Jackson tries to moon-walk his way through the pearly gates!

Mayhaps he is about to start the toughest sentence yet, and his innocent victims will have justice at last.

Christ also said 'Money is the root of all evil' and in Wacko Jacko's bizarre world He couldn't be more right.

Goodbye and good riddance to the most ridiculous figure on the world stage: an "anti-racist" who tried to preach to the rest of us as he thinned his nose and bleached his skin (not to mention his ridiculous Hollywood-lifestyle as he preached "save the planet" hokum to the rest of us!).

Surely Dante had a special circle of hell for hypocrites and child-abusers?

I know... the older I get, the more liberal my views!

New Whitelaw (Blood & Honour) Shirt

This is the brand new Whitelaw T-Shirt now available from the FC Online Shop.

We're also please to announce that the Skrewdriver Rising and Skrewdriver Strong Survive (Cards) T-Shirts are now back in stock too!

Pop by for a visit whilst stocks last as these are sure to sell out fast!

Whitelaw Shirt

Tuesday, 23 June 2009

More on the BBC's Iranian Fibs Plus U.S. Psyops

BBC in Public Deception

Doctored Rally Pics

Iran Falling To US PSYOPS?

By Paul Craig Roberts

22 June, 2009

President Obama called on the Iranian government to allow protesters to control the streets in Tehran. Would Obama or any US president allow protesters to control the streets in Washington, D.C.?

There was more objective evidence that George W. Bush stole his two elections than there is at this time of election theft in Iran. But there was no orchestrated media campaign to discredit the US government.

On May 16, 2007, the London Daily Telegraph reported that Bush regime official John Bolton told the Telegraph that a US military attack on Iran would "be a ‘last option’ after economic sanctions and attempts to foment a popular revolution had failed."

We are now witnessing in Tehran US "attempts to foment a popular revolution" in the guise of another CIA-orchestrated "color revolution".

It is possible that splits among the mullahs themselves brought about by their rival ambitions will aid and abet what the Telegraph (May 27, 2007) reported were "CIA plans for a propaganda and disinformation campaign intended to destabilize, and eventually topple, the theocratic rule of the mullahs." It is certainly a fact that the secularized youth of Tehran have played into the CIA’s hands.

The Mousavi protests have set up Iran either for a US puppet government or for a military strike. The mullahs are in a lose-lose situation. Even if the mullahs hold together and suppress the protests, the legitimacy of the Iranian government in the eyes of the outside world has been damaged. Obama’s diplomatic approach is over before it started. The neocons and Israel have won.

The US intervention and the orchestrated disinformation pumped out by the western media are so transparent that it is impossible to believe than any informed person or government is taken in. One cannot avoid the conclusion that the West wants the 1978 Iranian Revolution overthrown and intends to use deception or violence to achieve that goal.

It has become increasingly difficult to believe that facts and truth motivate the western news media. For the record, I would like to point out a few of the most obvious oversights, to use a euphemism, in the Iran reporting.

According to a wide variety of news sources (for example, London Telegraph, Yahoo News, The Globe and Mail,, Politico), "Before the polling closed Mr. Mousavi declared himself ‘definitely the winner’ based on ‘all indications from all over Iran.’ He alleged widespread voting irregularities without giving specifics and hinted he was ready to challenge the final results."

Other news sources, which might not have been aware that the polls were kept open several hours beyond normal closing time in order to accommodate the turnout, reported that Mousavi made his victory claim the minute polls closed.

Mousavi’s premature claim of victory before polling was over or votes counted is clearly a preemptive move, the purpose of which is to discredit any other outcome. There is no other reason to make such a claim.

In Iran’s system, election fraud has no purpose, because a small select group of ruling mullahs select the candidates who are put on the ballot. If they don’t like an aspiring candidate, they simply don’t put him on the ballot.

When the liberal reformer Khatami ran for president, he won with 70% of the vote and served from 1997-2005. If the mullahs didn’t defraud Khatami of his win, it seems unlikely they would defraud an establishment figure like Mousavi, who was foreign minister in the most conservative government, and is backed by another establishment figure, Rafsanjani.

As Mousavi was seen as Rafsanjani’s man, why is it "unbelievable" that Ahmadinejad defeated Mousavi by the same margin that he defeated Rafsanjani in the previous election?

Neoconservative Kenneth Timmerman let the cat out of the bag that there was an orchestrated "color revolution" in the works. Before the election, Timmerman wrote: "there’s talk of a ‘green revolution’ in Tehran." Why would protests be organized prior to a vote and announcement of the outcome? Organized protests waiting in the wings are not spontaneous responses to a stolen election.

Timmerman’s organization, Foundation for Democracy, is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for the explicit purpose of promoting democracy in Iran. According to Timmerman, NED money was funneled to "pro-Mousavi groups who have ties to non-governmental organizations outside Iran that the National Endowment for Democracy funds."

The US media has studiously ignored all of these highly suggestive facts. The media is not reporting or providing objective analysis. It is engaged in a propagandistic onslaught against the Iranian government.

We know that the US funds terrorist organizations inside Iran that are responsible for bombings and other violent acts. It is likely that these terrorist organizations are responsible for the burning buses and other acts of violence that have occurred during the demonstrations in Tehran.

A writer on says that he was intrigued by the sudden appearance of tens of thousands of Twitter allegations that Ahmadinejad stole the Iranian election. He investigated, he says, and he reports that each of the new highly active accounts were created on Saturday, June 13th. "IranElection" is their most popular keyword. He narrowed the spammers to the most persistent: @StopAhmadi @IranRiggedElect @Change_For_Iran. He researched further and found that on June 14 the Jerusalem Post already had an article on the new Twitter.

He concludes that the new Twitter sites are propaganda operations.

One wonders why the youth of the world, who do not protest stolen elections elsewhere, are so obsessed with Iran.

The unexamined question is Mousavi and his motives. Why would Mousavi unleash demonstrations that are obviously being used by a hostile West to discredit the government of the Iranian Revolution that overthrew the US puppet government? Are these the actions of a "moderate"? Or are these the actions of a disgruntled man who kept his disaffection from his colleagues in order to gain the opportunity to discredit the regime with street protests? Is Mousavi being manipulated by organizations funded with US government money?

John Bolton laid out the US strategy. First we try to destabilize the regime. Failing that, we strike them militarily.

As this strategy unfolds, Iranians will pay in lost independence or in blood for the naiveness of its secularized youth and for the mistake the mullahs made in trusting Mousavi.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand.

Saturday, 20 June 2009

Iran: BBC Caught Out Teling Naughty Fibs

Meanwhile, on Page 94 the BBC admits its spin and lies were found out:

Ahmadinejad Rally Reported as Opposition Rally

Friday, 19 June 2009

Many Twitter Users are in Israel and America: Not Iran

News reaches our ears that much of the "Twitter" content -- so beloved of the BBC! -- coming from protesters and the opposition in Iran is actually coming from America and Israel.

No wonder the Yankee Zionist regime asked Twitter not to close down for work/upgrades.

Despite pre-election polls showing the "opposition" would lose the election, the BBC still insists on belittling the majority who support the Iranian government.

It's pet reporter and MI6 stooge, John Simpson, insists on calling mass demonstrations in favour of the government as "bussed in" to Central Tehran. No mention of who's backing the opposition (we've had Kissinger and a CFR nodding dog on Newnight).

Gordon Brown asks that Iran should show the election was fair.

Are our elections fair? Masonic mass media primes people on a clutch of Masonic parties.

When the dust settles no doubt we will hear who has been pulling the strings behind the people desperate for power in Iran, to the extent they will ignore an election result.

Then we might see that it wasn't just "Twitter" that had links to Israel and America.

It seems we have a glitch in our online FC shop.

Please bear with us as we try and fix this.

Our webmaster, once we pry him away from the cross-hairs in Tehran, will be trying to get to the bottom of this...

Wednesday, 17 June 2009

2.2 Million Unemployed, £1.3 Trillion to the banks: Masons have Wrecked the UK

Loans, guarantees etc. to the banks have meant the UK taxpayer is covering the banks for £1.3 trillion.

Today news is in that unemployment is at a 12 year high at 2.2 million.

Yet still our government refuse to "bail out" industries and firms facing short-term problems.

Still our government allows big business to employ immigrants at low wages, whilst indigenous people sit on the dole.

Still immigrants, asylum seekers etc. are housed, fed, educated, etc. etc. whilst services are cut to pay debts to the banks.

Now various chickens are coming home to roost as the government is forced to admit an overwhelming national debt, and cuts in services to pay the debts and its interest.

The state has borrowed (at interest!) from banks to 'bail out'..... the banks!

Read that again.

Has it sunk in yet? What a ridiculous situation!

Every single politician and party is subservient to the banking system and the Judeo-Masonic usury system.

None will dare to rock the boat, as the banking-usury system use a carrot and stick to deal with the politicos, appealing to the greed and to their love of position, power and their overinflated self-importance.

So there we go, dear reader.

You, me and the local lollipop lady are covering the usury-banksters for £1.3 trillion, we will suffer the cut-backs as the debt is paid back by us tax-payers, meanwhile some of the firms we work for go to the wall as a useless government looks on.

Britain 2009. You really couldn't make it up!

Unemployment at 12 Year High
UK economy shrinking

Politicians Decide Against Bank Regulation

P.S. We must demand to know which politicians are Masons, which have worked for banks (pre, during or post holding office) and which government ministers, opposition shadow ministers etc. belong to groups like the Bilderbergers, CFR and similar shadowy groups.

Monday, 15 June 2009

How We Can Teach Iran a Lesson or Two on Elections

What a rum state of affairs in Iran!

What are we, the oh-so advanced "democrats" in the West to make of all this?

That Iranians are free to vote? Yet the Zionists will say they can only vote for Islamicists under a controlled media; unlike us who can only vote for Zionists and Masons... under a controlled media.

That Iranians are free to demonstrate? Yet the Zionists will say they can only do so under the eye of a police machinery which has already killed one person; unlike us who live in a police state, increasingly cannot demonstrate, and - as with the G20 protests - even innocent bystanders are killed!

Of course all this is in the background of an Iran that wishes to have nuclear power... unlike us, who seek to have... erm... nuclear power.

But then Iran is in the pockets of anti-Israeli mad man, unlike us... who are... erm... in the pockets of pro-Israeli mad men.

of course, lest we forget, the illegal UN-resolution bustin' state with the only illegally held nukes in the Mid East (a state which refuses to sign non-proliferation treaties or allow in UN inspectors) already threatens to bomb peaceful power installations...


For yourself.

Meanwhile those who might rant and rave, especially the Zionists, of an "unfair election" we shouldn't have such short memories as to overlook the postal elections of our own recent history which a judge said would shame a Third World banana republic.

Nor indeed of the hanging and swinging chads that ushered in a Zionist marionette into the White House and which also resulted in rioting on the streets of America (to be followed by an election in which one Masonic Skull & Bones society member (aka "Bonesman") stood against a fellow Bonesman.


Aren't we so high and mighty, we "democrats?"

Tuesday, 9 June 2009

BNP Documentary on Welsh BBC1 Tonight

For those in Wales, or with satellite TV (try channels on Sky around Channel 974 or thereabouts), there is a programme on tonight at 10.35 entitled Week In Week Out (a regional 'Panorama style programme) on the BNP, entitled 'Race For Europe' (or similar!??).

Monday, 8 June 2009

Euro Elections: UKIP and BNP advance

Just a quick few lines:

Congratulations to the BNP on their two MEPs.

Interesting to see UKIP beat Labour (as foretold by some and scoffed at by others!).

With Labour collapsing and the Tories not picking up extra votes... it makes politics a little more interesting in the short term at least.

Otherwise there is a clear call by a huge portion of the electorate for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty at least, if not EU membership!

UKIP beating the government drives this point home!

Sunday, 7 June 2009

Minor Party County Council Election Results 2009

As of this moment it seems:

BNP: Three County Council seats (with claim of up to 5 Euro seats).
English Democrats: Won Vote for Mayor of Doncaster. No news on County Council seats.
Greens: 12 County Council seats (now on 123 seats).
UKIP: Eight County Council seats (plus claim for Euro Election triumph and beat BNP/Greens at head-to-head votes)
Mebyon Kernow: No update on their site, but they seem to have won 3 seats.

Any news on Socialist or similar parties' candidates welcome in feedback section.

Here's the blurb from the "minor parties sites."


The British National Party stands to take at least one European parliamentary seat and has a chance of taking another three, according to a detailed analysis of the local election results across the country.

The BNP’s statistical analysis department has taken all of the available local election results from each region, and combined them to generate an average BNP vote across each region. These figures then provide a basis upon which European parliamentary results can be estimated. (European parliamentary seats are apportioned according to a complicated highest averages system known as the d’Hondt method, which is dependent on the total number of votes a party receives and the number of seats already allocated to that party in the election.)

The analysis of the local election results on Thursday are subject to a number of important caveats as far as the BNP is concerned.

- Firstly, in many regions, elections took place in local authorities which were not traditional BNP territory. For example, the BNP fought seats in the South East which had never been contested before, while in the West Midlands, there were no elections in BNP strongholds such as Stoke. For this reason, the local authority election results will be skewed, but they are the only figures currently available upon which any estimates can be made.

- Secondly, party political choice at local level may not be representative of party choice at national level. There is a strong train of thought which suggests that turnout for the BNP at Euro level is lower than at local level. Conversely, there is an equally strong argument that people who have voted BNP at local level are likely to already feel strongly enough about politics to carry this allegiance through to Euro level. On the current figures, it is impossible to tell which of the two scenarios will play out. Either of them, in any event, do not affect the fact that the BNP has an excellent chance of taking at least one seat in the North West.

- Thirdly, the final Euro tally will be affected by the size of the turnout for the UKIP party. Talked up by the media, it is highly possible that large numbers of people who have voted Tory at local level would have given their Euro vote to UKIP. This will see a substantial UKIP vote, which may affect the ability of the BNP to take seats under the d’Hondt system, even if its vote increases as per the figures below.

With these important caveats in mind, here follows the average local election result for the BNP. The possibility of a win or loss is calculated upon the minimum percentages required for the BNP to place on that region’s list of elected MEPs.

- South West region: Average BNP vote: 6.8 percent. Result: No Euro BNP seat.

- South East region: Average BNP vote: 7.4 percent. Result: BNP vote just below the threshold, therefore no Euro BNP seat. (This result can be affected by the fact that the BNP only fought local elections in many areas which had either never seen a BNP candidate before, or which had no record of previous large BNP votes.)

- London region: Only one local election contested by BNP, vote was 17.5 percent. Impossible to make prediction, therefore must presume no Euro BNP seat.

- East of England (Eastern) region: Average BNP vote: 9.8 percent. Result: BNP vote just below the threshold, therefore no Euro BNP seat.

- East Midlands region: Average BNP vote: 14.3 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat.

- West Midlands region: Average BNP vote: 12.6 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat. (This result could be boosted by the fact that the best BNP-supporting areas in the West Midlands - Stoke, Sandwell, Dudley and others - did not have local elections on Thursday, meaning that large numbers of BNP voters are not reflected in this average figure.)

- Yorkshire & Humberside region: Average BNP vote: 10.3 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat. (This result could be boosted by the fact that the best BNP-supporting areas in Yorkshire - Leeds and others - did not have local elections on Thursday, meaning that large numbers of BNP votes are not reflected in this average figure.)

- North East region: Only two mayoral elections held, average BNP percentage in those two contests was 6 percent. Impossible to calculate on those figures, therefore no Euro BNP seat.

- North West region: Average BNP vote: 13.1 percent. Result: One BNP Euro seat, and possibly two.

It therefore seems likely that that BNP will take at least one European parliamentary seat in the elections. If the local results hold true on the Euro level, it could be more.

In either event, the BNP has now established itself as a national presence, and has become firmly embedded throughout the country as a household name. Membership has increased dramatically during the campaign, and the party is now better placed than ever before to carry on the struggle for the survival of our nation.

English Democrats:

3:15 TODAY: Doncaster elect the country's first English Democrats mayor.

Labour and Tory candidates eliminated after first round.

Davies wins after second round count.
Peter Davies 25,344 - Mick Maye 24,990

The Doncaster free press reported that:

As a true Englishman, Davies celebrated his victory with a pint of foaming nut-brown ale....

Party chair Robin Tilbrook congratulated Peter on his spectacular triumph.
"Peter has done fantastically well, he's fought a great campaign on the issues that really matter.
This is not only a great result for the people of Doncaster - it's a great result for the people of England, too! Peter is now truly the Boris Johnson of the north."


In yesterday's county elections the Green Party continued to make steady progress.

The party made its breakthrough onto four county councils - Cambridgeshire (1 seat), Devon (1), Gloucestershire (1) and Suffolk (2).

In Norfolk the Greens held 2 seats and gained 5.

In Lancashire the party successfully defended 1 seat and gained a second. Lancaster Greens also held a city council seat in a by-election, and continue to hold 12 seats on the city council.

Unfortunately the Greens had effectively lost 4 seats before the campaign began, due to council reorganisation and boundary changes (in Eastern and North East regions). The only unexpected loss was 3 out of the 5 Green Party seats on Oxfordshire County Council.

Greens gain most at Labour and LibDem expense

The Green Party ended the campaign with 123 councillors on 42 councils, up from 119 on 41.

Of the Green Party's gains, 7 were from Labour, 2 from the LibDems and 1 from the Conservatives. This too continues a familiar pattern.

The party's steady progress in the 2009 elections was reflected in recruitment, with an 8.5% growth in membership during the six weeks of the campaign.

Greens look forward to the general election

The single most encouraging result was in Norfolk, where the Greens won more votes than any other party not only in the Norwich South parliamentary constituency, but also throughout the Norwich City Council area. This bodes well for the target constituency of Norwich South, which will be contested by Adrian Ramsay, the Green Party's deputy leader and currently leader of the opposition on Norwich City Council.

And in Lancashire, in the Lancaster and Fleetwood target constituency the Greens outpolled everyone except the Conservatives.


UKIP have triumphed in the local elections taking a total of EIGHT seats on Staffordshire, Nottinghamshire, Norfolk and Suffolk county councils and Newcastle-Under-Lyme district council.

The Party has picked up four council seats on Staffordshire County Council as Labour were decimated, losing 29 of their 32 councillors.

The UKIP winners were Derrick Huckfield (Bradwell & Porhill), David Nixon (Cross Heath & Silverdale), Geoff Locke (Kidsgrove & Talke) and Steve Povey (Leek South).

In Nottinghamshire, Labour again got a pasting losing 22 of their 35 seats and UKIP were among the beneficiaries as Rev Tom Irvine won Hucknall. And in Norfolk, Rex Parkinson-Hare took the Yarmouth Nelson and Southdown ward with 779 votes, beating Labour on 702 and the Conservatives on 551. Again, Labour was crushed, losing 19 of their 22 seats on the council.

On Suffolk County Council, UKIP's Bill Mountford will take up his seat on behalf of the residents of Lowewstoft South.

Meanwhile, in the by-election for Newcastle-Under-Lyne, UKIP's David Woolley is the new representative for Wolstanton.

A handful of results from the 594 seats contested by UKIP are still to come in but 57 of the party's candidates, so far, won more than 25% of their seat's total vote. Overall, UKIP took a total of around 350,000 votes at the council elections.

In the 480 seats where both UKIP and Labour contested elections, UKIP took more than 80,000 votes than Labour. And the party also beat the BNP and the Green Party in the majority of seats where they were head-to-head.

The average UKIP vote share in seats where a party candidate stood was almost 16%.


BBC Web Update (seems a bit wrong on some counts???)

Clash of Civilisations: 2000 Years of Anti-Christian Hatred

I just began reading a book entitled The Stripping of the Altars by Cambridge Professor Eamon Duffy after reading his more recent book on the reign of Mary Tudor (both published by Yale University Press).

Right: Prof Duffy's book on the grass roots faith of the people of England.

The book deals with the grass roots religion of the English people from circa 1400 to 1580, written to show that the changes imposed under Henry VIII, but primarily under the reign of Edward VI, were not universally embraced, moreover they were piecemeal and grudgingly enforced, and so easily reverted under the reign of Mary Tudor (e.g. removed Rood screens secretly stored and simply replaced).

That gives you some background anyway.

In the preface to the second edition Duffy answers some of his critics in relation to the mater of the Lollards in the early 15th Century. He answers that the Lollards had little effect on the population as a whole. In fact, the Lollards are an interesting pointer to how sometimes the path to hell is paved with good intentions, because some who justly called for a return to charitable acts and godly priests became twisted enough to attack the sacraments of the Church.

Some of their fellow early Lollards even turned on them and attacked them for this. It kind of makes you think of the Reformation itself, with many people fed up of genuine corruption in the Church, but the assault on Churches, the pulling down of statues etc. speaks of a far more suspect motive.

As such Duffy discusses those in the 15th Century who were attacking the very idea of the sacraments, especially of Christ's body, blood, soul and divinity being present in the Eucharist.

He writes of a Mid-15th Century play called the Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which he thinks was written in Suffolk. Here he tries to show how short-lived and shallow was 'Lollardy' because by this time the play, which could have been used to sucker-punch the Lollards and "contemporary heresy" makes no mention of them at all.

As Duffy himself says:

"The anti-sacramentalists of the play are Jews."

And that, I think, is the nub of the reality.

It was well to question corruption in the church - as many did and do. This finally resulted in the Counter Reformation (and if you get the chance, for a startling account of the theological and political nature of it and its ramifications for Europe, read The Counter Reformation 1550 - 1600 by B.J. Kidd published by SPCK, the London-based Anglican in-house publisher).

The force which always pushed against the Church as it existed and the sacraments were, surprise surprise, the Jews.

Little surprise there as the Crucifixion of Christ was the act of their religious leaders 2000 years ago, and as any genuine Christian or Jew will say the Church and Christians of the 15th Century believed with its heart and soul that the Sacramental nature of the Mass, the central pillar of daily and weekly life for most folk, was a re-enactment of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion.

In short there were Altars in every Church in every city, town and village because you need an Altar for a Sacrifice; and the vast majority of English (and European) people believed in the Sacrificial nature of the Mass.

Those opposed to this were the Jews, who rejected Christ and His Church.

This is the lesson for all history.

Who publishes the movies that blaspheme and mock our Christian heritage? Who runs the banks that enslave our people, business and government in illegal anti-Christian usury? Who bankrolled and organised Communism that ushered dozens upon dozens of millions of Christians to their deaths in gulags and via enforced starvation? Who are disproportionally present in so many "Western" governments - governments that betray our people, enslave us, destroy ancient freedoms and bring in multi-culti anti-religion?

Who promoted Luther and his works to attack the Church, only to reject even his watered-down Christianity (much to his chagrin after all their help and anti-Papal diatribes he thought he would convert them all) and so cause him to retaliate by writing 'The Jews and their Lies?'

What of the Jewish printing presses in places such as Amsterdam which published tracts attacking the Inquisition in Spain?

This was the Church's attempt to overturn heresy in its own ranks (note: nobody outside the Church could be brought in front of it) by "conversos" - Jews who claimed to have converted to Christianity yet continued a form of "Crypto-Judiac" religion. And yet the Jewish printing preses churned out material purporting to attack the Church for some kind of "genocide" of Jews.

Indeed, so many people (for the right and wrong reasons!) point to the Spanish Inquisition as the forerunner to the Shoa/Holohoax; and the roll of a controlled media in both events cannot be overstated.

As one nationalist wrote in his article on 'the Sacred Nature of the Six Million' the attempt in more recent decades has been to remove the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as the centre of world history, the point in time that all peoples looked to, with the "sacrifice" of the "six million" in WW2.

Some folks think when the Jews rejected Christ they were looking for a new militaristic messiah that would bring their world empire (er... New World Order), with the Jews as the "chosen people" at the head of it.

Others think that the Jewish people, or their religious/political leaders, now consider themselves to be a kind of messiah (a form of Race worship), with a duty to control the world, bring "enlightenment" to the world (hence the role of Freemasonry etc.) and throw off the shackles of Christian "superstition."

Right: A satire on the French Revolution, yet in The Terror of the Masonic French Revolution, there was a real Talmudic bloodlust to murder all those who adhered to Christianity and Tradition. The hatred of Christianity saw a naked whore enthroned in a Cathedral as the goddess Reason, and the Eiffel Tower constructed on consecrated Hosts, to show the Masonic "victory" over Christ.

They founded Freemasonry as a "gentile Judaism" to bring about revolutions and amoral politrickery, and even Freemasons have admitted that their religion is Talmudic and Luciferian.

They founded Communism to bring about a revolution against Christianity and to establish their Utopian vision (of gulags and repression). Communists and Jews have admitted that Communism was Jewish.

They even founded Islam some 1400 years ago as a means to stop Christianity spreading eastwards to their new lands in the Khazaria region, to provide a buffer-zone.

Anyhoo, the issue here is that whether we look at Palestine at the time of Christ, 7th Century Arabia, Mid 15th Century England, 17th Century Spain, 18th Century France, 20th Century Russia, 21st Century America or so many other times and nations, the "Clash of Civilisations" is clear.

It has been a fight ongoing for 2000 years.

If we value our Christian heritage then we have to know our history, we have to know who our enemy is, and why they hate us and Christianity.

Unless we know all this, any resistance, any fight for national Independence is meaningless, because our historical enemy will merely take it and pervert it to their own ends.

If Nationalism becomes Zionist then it has lost before it has even got anywhere.

Saturday, 6 June 2009

Alternative Allotments

Have a look at this website – it is a marvellous idea. It is simply a way of putting those in touch who want some land, on which to grow fruit and veg, with landowners. There is also the chance for people to pass on their experience to others. In one town there is a 40 years (yes, years not weeks) for an allotment, perhaps this could become a viable alternative.

Land Share

Friday, 5 June 2009

Elections: BNP, English Democrats & UKIP news

Congratulations are due to the BNP for their first ever County Council seat in Lancashire, and also to the English Democrats for winning the vote for Mayor of Doncaster.

The first is a landmark for the BNP and may point to possible seats in the Euros, though electoral "experts" say it's touch and go.

The Eng-Dems vote is a bit of an amazing story, in a town rocked by Labour Sleaze for many years. They as a party are not too dissimilar from the modernised BNP (non-racist, Jewish members etc.), though they stand on a specifically English nationalist ticket.

What is interesting there is that the town's mayor has real power to implement policy, so if the Eng-Dems can keep clear of corruption they could bring about some radical ideas in a local region blighted by Labour rule!

Go on Eng-Dems: usury-free local currency!!! Go for it!

Meanwhile UKIP -- who, as I said previously, if they beat Labour in the Euros could actually oust Gordon Brown and start an anti-EU avalanche -- have said they believe there was chicanery in Thursdays Euro Election, with ballots being folded so that UKIP seemed not to be on the list!

Today the Brown government is in flux with multiple resignations (including one MP standing down, sparking a by-election) on top of a collapsed vote.

Now we have to wait and see if the Euro Election results can oust a deeply unpopular man. If UKIP do beat Labour putting them into third (or even fourth!) place - I hope still on the cards - Brown could be gone, the clamour for a general election will grow (with a chance for more "nationalist" candidates to profit from party political sleaze in certain areas) and the band waggon for a vote on the Lisbon Treaty will simply grow and grow: which will mean more than any councillor seats.

If the UK votes against Lisbon it will blow the Europhiles' ship out of the water!

As arch Europhile Glenys Kinnock moves to the House of Lords to grab more wonga at our expense (after pocketing huge volumes c/o Brussels/Strasbourg!) there would be nothing more fitting than to see her party rubbished by one, no matter its policy faults et al, that stood on a purely anti-EU ticket.

Let the good times roll!

BNP Lancs County Council Seat

English Democrats Win Mayor Vote
UKIP on Folded Voting Papers

Wednesday, 3 June 2009

Squadron CD Back in Stock: Skinhead Thrash/Metal

We're pleased to announce that the Squadron CD Combat, Battle and Burn is back in stock.

Possibly their best CD, this combines solid skinhead rock with a hint of Thrash and Metal.

With a superb cover of Manowar's Blood of the Kings.

A must-have for all but the most hardened rabbi!

Squadron CD

Tuesday, 2 June 2009

The trade union of Hungarian police officers prepared for action, says:

Given our current situation, anti-Semitism is not just our right, but it is the duty of every Hungarian homeland lover, and we must prepare for armed battle against the Jews.

Rebecca Rubin: American Doll & Wanted Criminal!

The new American Girl doll, Rebecca Rubin, shares a name with a woman who is wanted by the F.B.I., accused of arson.

American Girl, the doll company based in Middleton, Wis., is expecting strong demand for the newest doll in its historical character line. The 18-inch doll, which went on sale on Sunday, is named Rebecca Rubin and comes with a storybook that describes her life in 1914, growing up on the Lower East Side as the daughter of Jewish Russian immigrants.

But the F.B.I. is more interested in another Rebecca Rubin. Rebecca J. Rubin, who sometimes goes by the alias Little Missy, is a fugitive who was indicted in 2006 in a series of arson fires in Oregon dating to 1997, according to her F.B.I. wanted poster.

The wanted Ms. Rubin carries a $50,000 reward and “should be considered armed and dangerous,” her wanted poster says. The doll Ms. Rubin costs $95 and can be bought with pet kittens and a toy challah bread.

How did the marketing slip happen? Julie Parks, a spokeswoman for American Girl, said that the company originally applied to register the name with the United States trademark office in 2004.

“Rebecca was one of the most popular names for Jewish girls in 1905, when Rebecca would have been born,” Ms. Parks said. “When researching last names, Rubin was on a list of a handful of other names that would have been appropriate for a Russian-Jewish family but, honestly, Rubin rose to the top because we liked the alliteration and knew that girls could easily pronounce it.”

The company was not aware of the outlaw Rebecca Rubin until last week, when Heeb magazine’s blog noted the similar name. “We feel confident that people will clearly see this as nothing more than what it is — an unrelated coincidence,” Ms. Parks said.

The F.B.I., on the other hand, is hoping the publicity for the doll will bring the flesh-and-blood Ms. Rubin, believed to be in her native Canada, to justice. “Any publicity that gets the word out that our Rebecca Rubin is wanted on various charges is certainly beneficial,” said Beth Anne Steele, a spokeswoman for the F.B.I. in Oregon.

NY Times

New Armed Forces Day Flag from FC

New Flag for Armed Forces Day

Lions Led by Donkeys... Words that echo from WW1 and, with our politicians most worried about lining their pockets and starting wars to benefit American and Israeli interests, little has changed.

Soldiers are still viewed as little more than cannon fodder, ushered around the globe to fight illegal wars for little benefit.

So it is that people will be standing up for the rights of soldiers on June the 27th.

Will the politicians listen or act as though the day justifies their illegal wars? Time will tell...

Armed Forces Flag in FC Shop

Geoff Hoon: New Labour's Profiteering War Criminal

Is it me - I find the idea that Geoff Hoon (Transport Secretary) has been "flipping homes" and trying to maximise his expenses especially sickening.

We can all remember when Mr. Hoon was Defence Secretary and desperate to justify the illegal war in Iraq, then later to justify the sad situation of troops' housing, and their being sent into battle with poor gear and soft-skin Landrovers.

A question for Mr. Hoon:

However many thousands of pounds you skimmed through your expenses over the years: how much body armour could that have bought for soldiers who died?

That's not even to compare the wage of Minister Hoon and the average squaddie.

There's something very, very wrong there!

I loathed Geoff Hoon when I knew he was a war criminal.

I hate him with a vengeance now that I know he's a profiteering, greedy war criminal!

Monday, 1 June 2009

Singalonga Expenses Scandal

In light of the scandal of politicians of all shades fiddling their expenses (in and out of Westminster and Brussels*) I got to thinking of what songs best some up this situation.

So here's my top 3 in reverse order:

  • One Law For Them by The 4 Skins. An obvious song, whose repetitive chorus speaks for itself: "One law for them; and another law for us."
  • Stormtroopers in Sta-press by The Last Resort. This one sums up the situation perfectly: "They got more money than they got sense, they're just after your last few pence. Shine up your boots for the fight, and let's go smash Westminster tonight!"
  • But the best of all has to be National Service by Super Yob (aka Frankie Flame and Straw Dogs) "I know you, you say 'bring back national service' " which has the story line of a right-wing Colonel Blink type politician getting found out and dragged through the courts, so the real crook is the one who sits in judgement on the workers of the country. It's a great singalong song too.
Perhaps you have ideas for similar songs that sum up the current situation - feel free to share them with one and all (nothing by Ken Dodd please).

*And just wait till they unravel local councils and their rotten bakhandas!

MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at