How interesting that the International Criminal Court (ICC) are being prompted by Britain to investigate possible 'war crimes' in Libya.
Right: War crime. A young Arab boy blinded by the white phosphorous dropped by war criminals, a crime of ethnic cleansing by despots.
The BBC (MI6) say that African mercenaries have been firing on civilians. Libya claim that the rebellion is an Islamist uprising.
There is some history to this, in that MI6 did use Islamist terrorists to try and murder Gaddafi. They failed and killed innocents. Talk about war crimes.
Latest news is that America is absolutely horrified because the mad dictator has dropped white phosphorus (burns the flesh) in an indiscriminate nature over areas that are of a different ethnic group to the evil tyrant. Imagine that?
Men, women and children, the innocent and the "guilty" with their burning flesh. Rumours are that schools ands hospitals have also been targeted.
We can all only hope that America will not rest until the criminal mad men responsible will be dragged kicking and screaming into the ICC.
After all, we are so often told that there must be no hiding place for war criminals, no refuge from justice, no time limit for crimes against humanity!
Update coming in.... Update coming in.... Update coming in....
Sorry those reports (phosphorous, schools, hospitals, homes, playgrounds etc.), including the these photos, were from Palestine and were carried out by the Israelis.
America has stood down.
Move along people.
Nothing to see here.
Friday, 25 February 2011
How interesting that the International Criminal Court (ICC) are being prompted by Britain to investigate possible 'war crimes' in Libya.
Thursday, 24 February 2011
Dresden "still divided" spins the BBC when clearly all but the far-left support the bombing today: they wave flags to show their support of the British terror-bombing of the cultural gem that was Dresden.
The Commie-Socialist-Anarchos have never been anything but reactionaries.
They opposed the war as "Capitalist" when Moscow had a pact with Berlin.
They uttered not a word when the USSR invaded Poland on the 17th of September 1939 (funnily enough, the UK did not declare war on the USSR despite this, and their invasion of Finland, another British-ally; yet Germany had a declaration of war within days of invading Poland. ).
Yet when Germany invaded the USSR, all of sudden the war was some sort of crusade against Fascism.
Read Douglas Hyde's I Believed for the full low down on Communist hypocrisy during this time (Hyde was in the top tier of the Communist Party and later exposed all the double-standards, amorality and general flip-flopping after becoming a Christian, interestingly enough after reading GK Chesterton's Weekly Review).
Oh another great example: The Spanish Civil War.
The Anarcho-Commies told us (and still tell us!) how it was a fight for democracy. You see the 'fascists' had rebelled against the government. Boo. How dare they.
What the anarcho-reds don't tell you is of the Anarcho-Communist rebellions against non-Communist governments carried out by the reds earlier in the 30s.
Hypocrites almost to a man.
And who were these defenders of democracy? They had Stalinist commissars, shipped from the USSR. Soviet weapons and aircraft. They massacred civilians, desecrated Churches, even exhumed corpses to defile.
This was all well documented and even sickened general "lefties" a few of which even joined the monarchists and nationalists for fear of the terror that would ensure if the reds won.
We have lots of examples of that too. The terror of the French Revolution. The mass murders following the Soviet Revolution (inc. circa 33 million dead Ukrainians, starved to death whilst the grain silos were full). The terror in Hungary. The mass murders in Cambodia. Millions dead in China. Plus the gulags, the torture and more in countries ranging from the Americas to Africa, Europe to Asia.
The whole Commie-Anarcho deal is offering us heaven on earth, but they can't even deliver that. Collectivism, starvation, drudgery, slavery, the gulag, torture and mass murder.
That's as good as it gets. They took Capitalist slavery - and made it worse on the back of promising better. Hypocrites.
Yet you can still buy your Commie chic t-shirt, because they tend to murder Christians you see, and we "don't count" whether we are Germans, Ukrainians, Russians, Poles or Spaniards.
We get the "6 Million" rammed down our throats by Hollywood. Funnily enough I haven't seen a film from Hollywood portraying the mass murder of Communism, still less who made up the cadre of commissars who organised the mass murders! Do the 33 million Ukrainians not count? Weren't their deaths "sexy" enough? Or is it a weird racism wherein dead European Christians don't count?
Nor have I seen a Hollywood film about the firestorm in Dresden, where literally countless tens of thousands of refugees, mostly women and children fleeing the Red Army as it raped its way across Poland and Germany, were incinerated by men who knew the war was all but over.
We've even had the "Jew-porn" that was Tarantino's fictitious "Inglorious Basterds" with Jewish soldiers, torturing and murdering evil "nazis" across occupied France (all contrary to the Geneva Convention and accepted rules of warfare, naturally), cheered on by the lefty elites of Hollywood.
No wonder that the reactionary Anarcho-Reds jeered and waved English flags in Dresden. Their support for mass murderers is second-to-none. They have no pity for innocent victims (unless they further their twisted aims and power grabs), for their creed dictates that the innocent must be enslaved, suffer and die for the glory of their cause, dressed up in the verbiage of 'brotherly love' and 'equality for all' just as it was in the Masonic French Revolution and the Communist Russian Revolution, which ushered in reigns of terror.
All Anarcho-Communism ever really stands for is the advance of a hand-picked (dare I say self-chosen?) few, and suppression of the Christian majority.
'Twas ever thus.
Sunday, 20 February 2011
Let us for one moment forget about the political parties being in hock to the banks/financiers, the national debt and so on.
Right. Let me then as a question that may shock and upset some.
Are Labour right? Is the Milliband (Jewish offspring of Marxists) proposal to spend ones way out of depression something better by degrees than the Tory prospect of taking money out of the economy (witness VAT at 20%, petrol no-one can afford, libraries closing etc.)?
Let us think of the example of Roosevelt's New Deal during the depression-era of 30's America. All/most the (for want of a better word) "fascists" of America lobbied Roosevelt and supported his New Deal. The idea (if I understand it right) was for the US government to spend money on huge projects, to get money flowing back through the economy, to get large numbers of the unemployed back in work.
Right: Roosevelt's New Deal had the support of the "radical right" in America. Fascism? Socialism? Wise move? Or short-term populism?
Then, again put aside your hang-ups, we are dealing with economics not political persuasions, we have the example of Hitler's Germany which, as the depression ground on in countries like the UK, put German workers' interests first and built the autobahns, pumped money into workers' houses, holidays etc.
Now I know they are not perfect mirrors of each other as I dare say the American and German governments treated banks, financiers and usury very differently (and that has huge ramifications in the short and long term), as would a Labour Party government in today's Britain.
But (and to misquote Graham Norton it's a big but) might we conjecture from this that the Labour Party's idea of spending money on projects to keep people employed, keep money flowing through the economy, make sense?
I'd be interested to hear what others think.
After all, if "free marketeers" charge in and start screeching "socialism," might we not reply that it took the "socialism" of a mass public bail-out to prevent the gods of the free-market going bust?
As Hilaire Belloc wrote some time before in the nationalist classic 'An Essay on the Restoration of Property', the Nationalist/Distributist position is that the "little man" (and his family/business) must be free from unnecessary government interference and the bullying monopoly-capitalism of the Tescos, and so be truly free. But when it comes to larger, national matters, there must be a government (truly representative - that's where Guilds come in) and even government ownership, to ensure important national matters (such as the infrastructure which cannot be run by small businesses) are not prone to "market forces."
Food for thought.
Saturday, 19 February 2011
Ian Kitchen and his very active wife have now resigned "all positions" in the BNP. From that we are lead to believe that they are still members.
What a sordid little world.
Wednesday, 16 February 2011
People in this country are taxed like never before. The government is in horrendous debt.
There seems to be an endless cycle of:
Worse still, the government is borrowing money from banks to pay off loans from banks.
Worse still it is paying off loans it took out from banks, to bail out banks.
Even in the "good years" the government was borrowing money whilst simultaneously paying back similar amounts.
Why not just stop borrowing?
Worst of all, the government could issue its own money instead of borrowing it.
We no longer have to have gold coins because our money is all but valueless pieces of paper based on a huge debt bubble.
My question is this:
As the banks (Bank of England, Federal Reserve etc. - all private banks) create money out of thin air and loan it to governments, where does all the money, earned by our labour and taxed from us, end up?
Am I alone is thinking that there is a class of people, mega-rich beyond the dreams of avarice, constantly acquiring more wealth like gluttons at an all-you-can-eat buffet?
Or are these billions used to buy up land, businesses etc. to give them more wealth?
Or are these billions used to 'sweeten' (bribe) politicians, generals, dictators and parties to keep the con going?
Or is it all of the above?
I am reminded of a few quotes:
"Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities, intrinsically, a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries." — Modern Money Mechanics Workbook, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1975
"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependant on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class." — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government's institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers" — Congressional Record 12595-12603 — Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency (12 years) June 10, 1932
"Banks lend by creating credit. They create the means of payment out of nothing" — Ralph M. Hawtrey, Secretary of the British Treasury
"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." — Henry Ford
But the daddy of all the quotes about banking is this peach. Hold on to your socks:
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." — SIR JOSIAH STAMP, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain).
Quotes on Banking
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
Inflation is up, wages have all but frozen.
Barclays Bank profits are up, and their average wage rose by £236,000.
Left: The debt rises continually.
While the rest of us are pushed into penury by a system that has bankrupted the UK to bail out the banks, who in turn keep us all in debt-slavery, the banks are already dolling out huge wages and bonuses to themselves.
The banks have screwed us all, messed up the economy, keep us in debt for life, strip the nation to pay unpayable debt interest.
Yet they live the life of luxury in our faces.
Right: National Debt as a percentage of the country's output ever since William of Orange sold us out for 400+ years by letting banksters establish the Bank of England. Note that National Debt is usually greater than the entire economic output of Britain (GDP)!
It is no longer a case of "paying unto Caesar" because Caesar is being robbed blind by the banks, and turning a blind-eye to the theft because Caesar's top crew are getting crumbs from the banking table.
The Church says that to defraud a working man of a just wage is one of the four sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance.
Not just quite bad, nor even really bad. But it cries out to heaven for vengeance.
Those are strong words.
How much worse then for an entire system to be based on a national debt for which the working man is taxed to the eyeballs (the poorer disproportionally moreso), which can never be paid off?
Even in the boom years the UK was paying the national debt interest (whilst still borrowing!) to the tune of millions heaped on billions.
Tony Blair said "education, education, education" before 1997, yet when in power he paid more off the national debt interest than he did on education.
The politicians are like drunken housewives, borrowing on top rate credit cards whilst paying the minimum due on existing ones, whilst the debt grows and grows.
Yet unlike the drunken housewife, the politicians can take the money from our pockets to pay the interest payments.
It is a fraud on a gargantuan scale.
It is criminal conspiracy to the tune of many billions per year.
It really is a sin crying out to heaven for vengeance.
Monday, 14 February 2011
The "lady" at the centre of the media BNP "Granny Porn" story has actually addressed a BNP meeting in Liverpool!
She is not a by-stander. She is a BNP official! Just the other day the "lady" in question hand-delivered the suspension letter of former Yorks BNP organiser Nick Cass.
This isn't 'guilt by association.' The "Granny porn" scandal runs to the very centre of the BNP.
What an absolute disgrace.
Pic of Liverpool Meeting
Sunday, 13 February 2011
A rather disturbing story has been doing the rounds on the internet, with some rather disturbing images.
It is now in the public domain, albeit c/o the soft porn paper that is the Sunday Sport.
BNP leader Nick Griffin (NG) has sacked the highly competent and highly respected (in and outside the BNP) Yorks organiser Chris Beverley and replaced him with a questionable man with dodgy connections.
The lady he just married (NG being at the wedding) is what is known as a "granny porn star" whose images have been put out in such circles.
This was known.
NG knew. Many told him.
He said it was a "private matter."
He went ahead and made the Granny Porn Star's husband the Yorkshire and Humberside BNP Regional Organiser.
He's either stupid, facetious or wilful in his ignorance. Once porn films/images are made, it is far from "private." It also makes the BNP look like the lying Tories: talking up Christian values etc. but in reality just another bunch of sordid politicians on the take.
The media have picked up on this, just as the BNP fight the Barnsley Central by-election (reminder: that's in Yorkshire).
In essence the BNP leader has created a perfect storm of media derision, activist disillusionment and supporter apathy.
We have warned for years that all this reflects on Nationalism per se.
Years from now, when NG is collecting his EU pension pot, people in Yorkshire will remember that Nationalism = hypocrites, porn, degeneracy and a non-choice, even when the BNP has been scuttled or re-launched with fresh leadership.
This story really is hard to believe.
Eddy Butler's Blog
Here we go again!
Or if we allow emotion to rule the heart, here we f###### go again!
New Labour wasted hours and hours promoting the sodomite agenda.
Now with the country falling apart around our ears, the Lib-Con govt is going to spend more time pushing the sodomite agenda.
No wonder we are in such a mess.
We can also, through this story, see two important things:
- The system's agenda has ALWAYS been for homosexual "weddings." They are not interested in civil partnerships. That's just softly, softly catchee monkey cobblers that all treacherous, profiteering, nepotistic bastards use to try and fool all the people all the time. They WANT full-blooded faggot "weddings" so the pooves are "totally equal."
- Peter Tatchell, the apologist for a paedophile agenda, is still the mouthpiece for the homosexual agenda. This shows us where we are headed. The homosexual agenda is a sick agenda. It will promote disease and death. It will promote drug use and abuse. It will promote sexual deviancy in private and public. It will lead to laws being ignored by the police and eventually overturned (especially viz public decency). It will lead to sexual acts with minors being gradually lowered.
The media and government have promoted a sodomite, homosexual, degenerate agenda.
No wonder deviancy and drug usage is rampant in the media (and not far behind in parliament, the city etc.).
NATIONALISM MUST OPPOSE THIS AGENDA.
We must show we are different. We must show we are decent. We must show we oppose the homosexual, deviant agenda and their druggie cohorts.
Not to do so is to surrender our lands to moral anarchy.
BBC: Govt to All Homosexual Church "Weddings"
Friday, 11 February 2011
Mubarak has resigned and the Egyptian Army, bankrolled by the USA, is in charge.
Will Egypt become a "democracy" or will other events come to pass?
The biggest question of all: will Egypt put the desires and needs of Egyptians first - or will it continue to kowtow to America and Israel?
That is what certain people in Tel Aviv, New York and Westminster will be most interested in.
When the Palestinians voted in Hamas, the likes of Israel and her allies took action. They started a civil war and blockaded the Palestinian areas.
You see, dear reader, it's not about democracy (like wot they told us in Iraq and Afghany) because if it was they wouldn't have backed Mubarak for 30 years.
It's about who supports Israel and what is in the Zionists' best interests. Always has been, always will be.
There will be a lot of jittery people in the Unholy Triumvirate of Tel Aviv, New York and Westminster, just as there will be a lot of spooks on the streets and behind the scenes in Egypt.
Their prime concern: Egyptian policy towards Israel. Simple as guvnor.
Saturday, 5 February 2011
David Cameron has spoken out against multi-culturalism.
Hooray? No, not at all.
The "we're in it altogether" squillionaire is not about to denounce mass immigration, the loss of indigenous culture or the fact that Europeans will be a minority in these islands in a few decades: a terrible legacy of Tory and Labour misrule.
No. Perish the thought that he would do anything honourable.
He is a traitor. He is a Zionist. He will one day walk away and work for the banks (like Blair and Mandelson before him). He is part of the problem.
Now he is aping BNP policy.
Yes. BNP policy.
Multi-culti is wrong. We all know that. It has been the elephant in the room for decades past. But the parties and media closed off any genuine discussion of it.
But to do what Cameron is doing, and what the BNP has been proposing, is racial genocide and will further wreck our lands.
He, like the BNP, is calling for an end to multi-culturalism (they are using he term as a kind of racial/cultural apartheid) and for it to be replaced by integration!
Yes, rejoice all you racial nationalists! Your cause was taken over years ago by idiots who, to get a few votes and Brussels placements, started courting non-Muslim support and saying how great it is that Blacks, Hindus etc. integrate, but how Muslims are the problem because they don't integrate.
Now it will be government policy. The BNP can disband! Their job is done!
Now we will have Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus and coloureds mixing in with our kids whether we -or they - want it or not!
Right: A successful model of integration.
With increased integration we will lose more of our identity and the coloureds can further argue that they too are "British."
Those happy photos in BNP papers and on BNP websites of British Whites hugging British coloureds and Asians has now been writ large.
Years ago we attacked the BNP for saying blacks were "British" whilst they attacked White Polish migrants (would you rather your daughter marry a Pole or Latvian? Or an African or Asian?).
This has now come full circle.
It is we, the peoples of Britain who will suffer. The rich, like Cameron, can move away from immigrants. Their idea of integration is what culture their au pair or cleaner comes from, which restaurant they will eat in, or (like Billy Bragg!) how well they get on with the petrol station attendant!
I have lived in heavily Asian areas, and it is not fun.
The policy of dispersal will make more race-mixing possible, will make a bad situation worse as vast numbers of non-Europeans move into more areas, more schools etc. etc. to be followed by the growing numbers of Somalis, Afghanis and other non-Whites still flooding in, no doubt to be dispersed to help integrate.
I hope the idiots in the BNP leadership who pushed their integrationist agenda years ago, just like they pushed their quasi-Zionist "it's all the Muzzies fault" line, are happy.
The chickens - of all shades and colours! - are coming home to roost.
RIP White Britain.
Friday, 4 February 2011
I saw this on a forum, and thought it apt.
Another point of interest is what is the tax used for anyway?
There is always the rightful objections to "gov't-sponsored" poofter conventions, abortion clinics etc. etc. etc. but such things are only a very small part of the expenditure of tax. The vast bulk of it goes to paying interest on gov't debt to privately owned banks.
|The Federal Reserve, which allegedly plays the role of the U.S. central bank, is actually privately owned. "The Idaho Observer" (June 2002, page 6) published a reconstructed conversation that took place on October 8, 1992, between Ron Supinski, of the Public Information Department of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, and Ron Hicks (the caller in the text). The conversation explained|
our fiat (faith based) monetary system.
CALLER - Isn’t the current money system a house of cards that must fall because the debt can mathematically never be paid off?
SUPINSKI - It appears that way. I can tell you have been looking into this matter and are very knowledgeable. However, we do have a solution.
CALLER - What is the solution?
SUPINSKI - The Debit Card.
CALLER - Do you mean under the EFT Act (Electronic Funds Transfer)? Isn’t that very frightening, when one considers the capabilities of computers? It would provide the Government and all it’s agencies, including the Federal Reserve, such information as: You went to the gas station @ 2:30 and bought $10.00 of unleaded gas @ $1.41 per gallon, and then you went to the grocery store @ 2:58 and bought bread, lunch meat and milk for $12.32, and then went to the drug store @ 3:30 and bought cold medicine for $5.62. In other words, they would know where we go, when we went, how much we paid, how much the merchant paid and how much profit he made. Under the EFT, they will literally know everything about us. Isn’t that kind of scary?
SUPINSKI - Yes, it makes you wonder.
CALLER - I smell a GIANT RAT that has overthrown my Constitution. Aren’t we paying tribute in the form of income taxes to a consortium of private bankers?
SUPINSKI - I can’t call it tribute; it is interest.
CALLER - Haven’t all elected officials taken an oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic? Isn’t the Federal Reserve a domestic enemy?
SUPINSKI - I can’t say that.
CALLER - Our elected officials and members of the Federal Reserve are guilty of aiding and abetting the overthrowing of my Constitution, and that is treason. Isn’t the punishment of treason death?
SUPINSKI - I believe so.
CALLER - Thank you for your time and information, and if I may say so, I think you should take the necessary steps to protect you and your family and withdraw your money from the banks before the collapse. I am!
SUPINSKI - It doesn’t look good.
CALLER - May God have mercy on the souls who are behind this unconstitutional and criminal act called the Federal Reserve. When the ALMIGHTY MASS awakens to this giant hoax, they will not take it with a grain of salt. It has been a pleasure talking to you, and I thank you for your time. I hope you will take my advice before it does collapse.
SUPINSKI - Unfortunately, it does not look good.
CALLER - Have a good day, and thanks for your time.
Anyone who regularly reads Private Eye will know of Richard Desmond. He is the publisher of many pornographic titles, who moved into pay-for porn TV, and has acquired ownership of the Star and Express newspapers, and more recently won ownership of Channel 5.
Now you might think that the government would baulk at the idea of a man who is a known pornographer owning one of Britain's "terrestrial" channels, but it seems that Mr. Desmond's choice output in hardcore pornography (once toe-curlingly read out to a cringing Tony Blair) being given the green-light to yet more media ownership is par for the course.
The first link below (Express Watch - coming from a leftist perspective) shows what a cunning-linguist Richard Desmond is, for his stable of papers will often take an anti-immigrant line, and quasi-anti-homosexual line (in that anti-pc, hand-wringing not-all-poofs-are-bad-really way we all know and hate) whilst his stable of porn TV channels will often have multi-racial porn and gay porn (according to Express Watch one channel is called Gay TV).
What his papers seemingly condemn on the one hand in a right-wing populist style, Richard Desmond's pay-to-watch porn channels promote on the other hand (if you'll pardon the masturbatory pun!).
What a strange character for the government to allow to take over a TV Channel, I mean a 'mainstream' channel, not his porno channels. Interestingly (or not) Wikipedia lists his porno channels as "Television X, Red Hot TV and others." (and others - why so shy?).
It is a bizarre publishing figure for a government to allow to run the country's fourth terrestrial TV stable (after the BBC, ITV and Channel 4) is it not?
Mr. Desmond lives in Golders Green (clue 1), does much charitable work for childrens' charity Norwood which raises big money for a certain 'section of the community' (clue 2), and he comes from that same 'section of the community' that has had a hugely disproportionate role in the porn industry (clue 3) both in the UK and worldwide.
Indeed, one must wonder why the publisher of such porno magazines as "Asian Babes, Horny Housewives, The Very Best of Mega Boobs, and S###k Loving Sluts" (he sold them in 2004) and the proprietor of many TV pornographic channels is allowed the presidency of Norwood, a charity that helps Jewish children.
Has the Charity Commission fallen asleep? Has the government?
Are we to believe that the ability to publish pornography in printed and televisual forms and thus raise millions, some of which can then be thrown at political parties or charities, is enough to "buy" placements in the media or charitable worlds?
Food for thought.
Richard Desmond Loves C##k (for Cash)
Wednesday, 2 February 2011
The EDL leader was on the BBC's Newsnight last night, and the programme looked into the anti-Muslim organisation.
It has 'gay,' Jewish, Sikh and Hindu members.
Left: The BNP started the "anti-Muslim pressure group" mentality that has been taken over by the EDL.
Its raw intel seemed to come from sources in Israel.
It seems that it wants to be anti-immigrant, but is forced down a cul-de-sac of being pro-integration and pro-wymmins rights, and pro-homosexual.
With the EDL drawing what the BNP would describe as "plebs" from the BNP, and thus denying them street muscle, leafleters, and local activists, the BNP is forced to attack the EDL, just as they are forced to attack UKIP.
They are fighting over the same constituents, albeit all three approach them from slightly different angles.
The BNP dismisses the EDL as "Zionist." It is. It is pro-Israel. But the BNP opened the door for the EDL. If the BNP had not made noises against Islam - accusing it of being anti-homosexual, anti-wymmin, and 'fascist,' then the EDL could not be peddling the Zionist integrationist line it is today.
Without the BNP sell-out there could be no EDL sell-out.
The sad fact is that the anti-immigration "movement" per se, should be something promoting White nationalism, culture etc. and something resolutely opposed to integration and Zionism.
Starting with the BNP this was changed in that "softly, softly catchee monkey" way, but once you step on that road it's very hard to know where to stop.
That is why it looks like sour grapes rather than policy and principle when the BNP moans at the EDL's "Zionism."
Right: Anti-fascist, pro-USA, pro-Israel, pro-homosexual. The BNP has allowed anti-migrant feeling to be subverted to a totally Neo-Con agenda.
If doing the same would garner the BNP more influence, seats, followers and (more than anything else) more money: they would do it at the drop of a hat!