Thursday, 28 July 2011

Norwegian Killer Approved of Vatican 2 for "Reaching Out" to Jews

Is this the zenith of our civilization?
Only Liberals, Jews and Athiests celebrated Vatican 2 which overturned the (2000 year) Christian opposition to anti-Christ Judaism (without Judaism refuting its anti-Christ nature one iota). It is fitting that the Freemason killer should approve of Vatican 2!

The following is Israel Shamir's personal take - but it contains much of interest and further informs us of who this Neo Con killer is.

The following is an extract from a recent article by Israel Shamir (source):

Why did he do it? We can answer the question: the massacre was essentially a publicity stunt for the killer’s opus magnum, 1500 pages of compendium “2083”. This is not a great achievement of human spirit, rather a copy-paste hotchpotch of Neocon writings on Islam and violent anticommunism. However, it deserves our study just because so many people were killed in order to make us read it. If this Breiwick was a Herostratus, let us see why he burned down the temple of so many lives. Moreover, we should see where he was wrong.

2083 reveals a new vicious political virus designed in genetic engineering labs of the Neocon think-tanks. For many years it was thought that a Nazi should hate Jews and befriend Muslims, because this was the case with Hitler’s Nazism. A Nazi was not supposed to hate Commies because Communism was a similar totalitarian ideology according to Karl Popper and George Bush. A Neo-Nazi should love Adolf Hitler and upheld racism.

Long labour of Jewish ideologists connected to Neocons succeeded to reverse the attitudes. Today we have a whole string of parties and movements which connect far-right ideas with sympathy to Jews, tolerance of gays, hate of Islam. The writer of 2083, too, is pro-Jews, pro-gays, violently anti-Muslim and anti-Communist. He is nearest to Pim Fortuyn, the assassinated Dutch far-right Judeophile gay politician. He marched with EDL, a British strongly pro-Jewish anti-Muslim militancy.

Breivik’s 2083 is heavily influenced by far-right Neocon Jewish writing. As is often the case with copy-paste compilations, it is difficult to fully separate words of the compiler and those of compiled authors. If it ever will be published, probably copyright of David Horowitz and Bat Yeor, Daniel Pipes and Andrew Bostom should embellish its page three. These writers inspired him to commit his mass murder.

Just a few hours before the attack, Gilad Atzmon wrote, Joseph Klein published in the FrontPage magazine an article entitled "The Quislings of Norway," (here) with additional incitement to murder. Klein wrote: “The infamous Norwegian Vidkun Quisling, who assisted Nazi Germany as it conquered his own country, must be applauding in his grave… Norway is effectively under the occupation of anti-Semitic leftists and radical Muslims, and appears willing to help enable the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel.”

These are fighting words, and Breitvik heeded them while loading his guns. 2083 proves these sources. Quotes from Frontpage of David Horowitz and its authors take hundreds of pages. Bernard Lewis has a place of honour. The notorious Bat Yeor, an Egyptian Jewish woman living in Switzerland, who coined the term “Eurabia” (an alleged conspiracy to subjugate Europe to Arabs) and did much to promote fear of Islam, corresponded with the killer, and she “kindly” advised him and sent him her unpublished texts. She is the only person named in his Declaration of European Independence, and her advice the newly independent Europeans should follow, according to Bat Yeor.

Robert Spenser, a sidekick of David Horowitz of Jihad Watch is another great love of the killer, and so is an American Zionist, Andrew G. Bostom, self-proclaimed expert on “Islamic anti-Semitism”. Daniel Pipes is presented with his thesis that “The Palestinian phenomenon was created with the intention to justify Jihad”. Melanie Phillips, the British far-right Zionist and a friend of the BNP leader, and other pro-fascist Islam-haters are also present. (Funnily, these guys repeatedly condemned me for my “anti-Semitism”)

Politically, the killer’s sympathies lie with “the United States and Israel. The creators of Eurabia have conducted a successful propaganda campaign against these two countries in the European media. This fabrication was made easier by pre-existing currents of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism in parts of Europe.” Economically, he preferred Milton Friedman, disliked taxes, was against welfare system.

He hated Palestinians, and speaks of “Palestinian terrorist jihad”. Like every good Zionist he ranted: “Muhammad Amin al-Husayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Arab nationalist leader, a leading force behind the establishment of the Arab League and a spiritual father of the PLO, was a close collaborator with Nazi Germany and personally met with Adolf Hitler. In a radio broadcast from Berlin he called upon Muslims to kill Jews wherever they could find them… he had visited incognito the gas chambers of Auschwitz.” Among the first things the independent Europeans should do is to stop any assistance to the Palestinians.

For Breivik, like for his Jewish teachers, Adolf Hitler is ultimate evil. He accepted and upheld antiracism, at least for tactical reasons. His dislike of multiculturalism is culture, nor race-based. He was not a racist: he killed blue-eyed Norwegians as well as their brown guests. He even hated David Duke – for being anti-Jewish. His hatred to Islam is not limited to borders of Norway, or Europe – like Neocons, he hated Muslims wherever they are to be found.

He spends many pages on describing evils of Turkey including massacres of Armenians, Greeks and Kurds. There is a long chapter on modern history of Lebanon, where curiously Israeli wars are missing, and the troubles of the country are presented via Christian/Muslim division. His favourite historical hero is Vlad the Impaler, Romanian prince better known as Count Dracula.

His logic is primitive and faulty: “If all ethnical groups and all cultures are equal, why is it black Africans, Afro-Caribbean blacks, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, and Eastern Europeans want to abandon their own lands en masse to live in the lands of the West?”

A simple explanation, “because the West constantly robbed and robs their countries” does not occur to Breivik.

He asks: “if we're all truly equal, why does the rest of the world want to live the Western lifestyle, a lifestyle created in the main by white people? Just why exactly, do they want to be part of capitalism, run businesses, work for the white man's industries, claim the white man's welfare and buy and use goods created by the creativity and ingenuity of Western - white - people?”

The correct answer: “no, they do not. But they are bombed or besieged if they want to follow their own way of life, like in socialist Cuba, North Korea or Libya”.

Breivik can’t be characterised a Christian fundamentalist, not even as a Christian nor Christian Zionist. His feelings towards Christianity are lukewarm at the best. He can’t even decide whether he is a Christian, he is still “struggling with this myself. Some of the criticism of Christianity…is legitimate.” As Jewish activists, he approves of “the Second Vatican Council from the 1960s …for reaching out to Jews”, which is usually detested by the conservative right.

Breivik is livid against Muslim immigration – though his arguments are valid for immigration in general, he always stresses “Muslim” element. But he does not call upon his country to stop tormenting Muslim states, though this is the main reason for Muslim immigration.

However, the immigration dispute is practically over in Europe. Understanding that immigration carries huge social costs penetrated into all strata of European society. Immigration presents a big problem to Europe on the background of low native birthrate. It is universally disliked, but by the wealthy people of privilege. If years ago immigration could be seen as a magic wand saving citizens from boring chores, something similar to slaves of ancient Greece or to machines, people do not see it this way anymore, as immigrants become enfranchised though not integrated. They certainly cause more unemployment and drop of salaries, if they choose to work; otherwise, they overload welfare budgets. Perhaps rather late, but now this debate is over in Europe. Today, a Norwegian does not have to shoot one’s fellow citizens in order to express disagreement with immigration: this became a commonplace.

A Counterpunch writer Vijay Prashad wrote: “the [killed] Labour youth had among them children of migrants from Sri Lanka and North Africa. Their Norway was not Breivik's Norway.” Well, that is why, probably, Breivik did not like them: he did not want their Norway to displace his Norway. Prashad condemned European conservatives who “cannot fathom that human beings are able to live convivial lives with those who are different” but history of Sri Lanka is not the best recommendation for peaceful conviviality. If however people of Sri Lanka want “to live convivial lives with those who are different”, they will have to practice that at home, not in Norway. Prashad may call Merkel and Sarkozy “Nazis” for refusing to let in more immigration, but the Utoya Massacre did sent a strong signal that many people feel bad about immigration and want it stopped.

Actually, immigration into Norway slowed down to a trickle. The government of Norway – like many West European governments – made immigration almost impossible. In a famous case, a young girl from Caucasus lived for some ten years in Norway, completed her university studies, wrote a novel in Norwegian – and still was deported as illegal alien. Multiculturalism is a slogan of yesterday, so Breivik is as outdated as Prashad.

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Direct Action Patriots: A Lesson from History

John Jenkins - and if you can do read his book 'Prison Letters' do so, it is full of Nationalist ideals - led a campaign to stop Wales being a charm on the bracelet of the Saxe-Coburg family.

He and his MAC activists took direct action which was most effective, yet it was designed in such a way that not one person would be harmed (A tradition in Wales going back to Saunders Lewis attack on an RAF bombing school before WW2 and the FWA's opposition to the flooding of Welsh communities such as Tryweryn in the 60s). Sadly there were two victims - the two MAC men who planned to blow up a railway line near Abergele.

Some will say that such actions cannot be justified, yet there are extreme periods of history when patriots must fight. Even democrats say that Churchill was right to plan "stay behind" teams of resistance fighters who would blow up train lines, murder occupiers and suchlike (although this would break the Geneva Convention following a surrender by the UK Government).

Of course such actions in defence of a country are, in reality, carried out by a brave few (such as the Churchill stay-behind teams) whether one wholeheartedly agrees with their aims or not. Yet the line to terrorism can so easily be crossed. The German occupiers of France 1940-44 called the French Resistance 'terrorists' and some French patriots who were independent of the German occupiers were indeed killed by the Resistance (some cells of which were Communist).

The difference between patriots desperate to defend their nations, such as John Jenkins and the MAC, and the Neo-Con Masonic/Zionist terrorists, from the likes of Anders Breivik who planted a non-discriminating bomb in Oslo town-centre is fathomless.

The true patriot counts the cost of each and every action and places real regard to the saving of life. The Masonic puppet goes for maximum impact via indiscriminate bombing/murder. It is a mentality we have witnessed on an ongoing basis in Occupied Palestine with the way the Israelis murder Palestinians, as if they were blades of grass to be stepped on.

In our lands where abortion on demand means that millions of innocent children have been, and continue to be murdered by the skipload, is it any wonder that those who support the terror-state of Israel and admiringly watch it mow-down innocent Palestinians, would think nothing of gunning down political opponents to make their case?

If you fail to pay your Council Tax you will be dragged into court, yet Blair and Campbell promulgated their "dodgy dossier" and thereby caused illegal wars in which countless thousands of innocents died. They remain at large, fawned over by a compliant media, given plush jobs by a grateful establishment. And we wonder why Masonic dupes like Breivik think they can murder indisctiminately to further their aims?

It is a trait of our modern Zionist times. To the Neo-Cons, the Masons, the Zionists -- we are all (whether the innocent unborn or OAPs on council estates, British soldiers or Iraqi schoolkids, Palestinian Christians or lefty kids on an island) expendable pawns in their political sharade.

To them we are chattel to be disposed of as they see fit.

Anders Behring Breivik Norwegian "Christian Extremist" is a Freemason: Shut Down the Lodges

Why hasn't the media mentioned this?

Why aren't the Lodges in Norway and overseas being investigated?

How can a man who is involved in anti-Christian Freemasonry, who named his phantom organisation on the Templars - a group suppressed by the Church and whose occult mythology the Masons have styled themselves on, be labelled a Christian?

How can a man who criticised the Flemish Nationalists (who are sickeningly pro-Israel) for not being pro-homosexual enough be considered Christian?

Let us see this picture shown on the news! Let us see the Lodges spied on. Let us see policemen and politicians being told that they cannot be members of the secretive Lodges.

Wasn't the Dunblane mass murderer also a Freemason? Weren't the Bologna killers members of the P2 Masonic Lodge?

How many more Masonic terror outrages before action is taken?

P.S. No doubt the National Secular Society and all its hangers-on will have been whooping up the idea of a "Christian fundamentalist" killing a lot of children/teenagers. That Mr Brievik describes himself as an atheist Darwinian (see link below) will no doubt make them celebrate this "great act" of Darwinian action (survival of the fittest) - or will they cover this up and feebly cling to mass media liberal headlines about his "Christianity?" I wonder...

Breaking News Oslo terrorist a Mason

Monday, 25 July 2011

Nick Griffin Wins BNP Leadership Election by 9 Votes

BNP's latest member applauds vote result
The BNP will now descend into more purges, recriminations and law suits.

It is out opinion that an ideological butterfly has ruined it to line his own pockets and create a personal fiefdom.

In the shadow of scandals involving the EU, the banks, the politicians, the media and the police, the emasculated BNP stands useless. Who pays the piper calls the tune.

Civic nationalism will limp on, multi-culti immigrant hugging BNP will ask for yet more money. Our future is sold as surely as it was when Mr. Griffin told Mr. Aaronovitch that the BNP 'supertanker' would take time to turn around.

It's not only been turned but has been holed below the water line.

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Norwegian "Neo-Nazi Extreme Right-Winger" Shooter Actually a Zionist pro-Gay Neo-Con

We are seeing a common pattern here.

The links below have info on the Norwegian shooter.

What's clear is that the character was incredibly pro-Zionist, pro-Gay and all the rest we associate with the American Neo Con movement.

He slagged off the Flemish nationalists for being too extreme, when they have already sold-out on issues such as homosexuality and Israel. The EDL in fact are pro-gay, pro-Israel and anti-Muslim so are already on the road to being an official Neo-Con offshoot (as the BNP tried to be).

Don't wait for the media to denounce his Zionism. We'll all grow beards (yes, even the ladies) long before that day comes round.

It is becoming more and more obvious, whether 911, 7/7, Bologna, Carpentras or Norway, the fingerprints of the same Judeo-Masonic few can be found.

Griffin Watch
The Intercept

Thursday, 21 July 2011

HackerGate: The Missing Link

Media moguls, police, politicians, judiciary, hacks: where on earth would they all meet-up? Where would they give out jobs to each other? Where would they do "insider dealing?"

Imagine the scene in plush, tree-lined avenue in a posh London suburb:

Govt. Minister: "Good to see you at the Lodge again m'Lord. Fancy a swift round of golf?"

Inquiry Chairman: "Of course."

Top Copper: "Then a swift brandy and cigar at the clubhouse, my treat."

Inquiry Chairman: "That's most kind."

Govt. Minister: "Now about this enquiry..."

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

Kevan Bleach, Rest in Peace

Terrible news from a friend today.

Kevan Bleach, FC supporter, 'pupil' of AK Chesterton and all round good egg passed away a few days ago.

After battling and surviving cancer, the disease returned and claimed Kevan at the age of just 59.

He had long worked in education, and had only retired a year previously.

A young protege of AK Chesterton, Kevan kept in touch with patriots across the years and retained an interest in sound finance, the Chesterbelloc, Distributism and similar.

Kevan will be sorely missed by those who knew him, for his studiousness, his gentle sense of humour and his knowledge of nationalism stretching back many years.

Saturday, 16 July 2011

Freemasons, Usury, Politics and Greed: HackGate and its Root Cause

Lord Leveson! Er... Hello!

We are all supposed to believe that a system man, another lawyer, will clean out the media and the parts of the system linked to it.

The politicos who wined and dined the media (and in turn were wined and dined by them).

The policemen employed by the media, and the media-men employed by the police.

You can almost imagine it all be arranged in The Temple.

The whole Masonic system is unravelling, helped by a kind of civil war.

It started with the banking collapse - the 'Credit Crunch.' That was caused by sheer greed (a theme that we will revisit). Usury banking - so Talmudic in origin - caused a huge uncontrollable bubble, which the politicians were not willing or able to try and control, let alone deflate.

Following the belittling of the bankers we had the Politicians' expenses scandal. This had been rolling along very merrily for years, and was now exposed by MI5's favourite, the Daily Telegraph. Happy coincidence?

No. This was the (cue the sinister music) Revenge of the Bankers.

Their greed was exposed, and the politicians had to turn on them (fleetingly) to escape the momentary wrath of the electorate. Of course despite an underlying hatred of bankers all that is now willingly swept under the carpet, not least because we are supposed to equate a few bloated politicos grabbing tens of thousands with the bankster-class who frittered away BILLIONS and who were bailed out with OUR money.

With the politicians in the sights of the banksters and their pet journalists, they too were unhappy at being exposed as money-grubbing fraudsters.

So here we are. A criminal enterprise is uncovered (at last!) despite the attempts of sections of the Masonic Temple, sorry - I mean the Met Police, and so the politicians are happy to scream blue murder - if only to get their own revenge on the fourth estate.

The politicians attacked the bankers to save their own hides
The bankers get the journalists to attack the politicians to provide a smokescreen
The politicians now attack the media.

The banksters have used "divide and rule" against the politicos and the journalists, emasculating both in turn, whilst they brush aside feeble "safety features" to carry on much as before.

And if you think a public enquiry will get to the real root cause of all this - perhaps you should remember Doctor David Kelly.

Some truths will only see the light of day many years from now.

MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at