Final Conflict

Where Does Liverpool's Luis Suarez Holiday?

2012-01-31T14:27:00.002Z

I was wondering, what with his break from football where Luis Suarez may consider taking a holiday.

Some black activists wished to create a New Negroland as a part of "Pan Negroism."

Funnily enough, if you follow the link you'll see it had no outposts in England or Europe.

How times change... God bless the politicians who allowed millions of non-Europeans to come here! Oh how we have been "enriched."

Meanwhile, the homo-rag The Pink Paper is taking legal action after a pooftah reporter overheard the end of a conversation about Suarez:

A man in pink spandex shorts had asked "where's Suarez from?"

And a Liverpool player had innocently replied: "I'm not telling you," then instantly thought better of it and said "Uruguay."

The FA says he'll be banned for 8 matches for a "homophobic hate crime."

Swastikas in North London?

2012-01-30T22:36:00.000Z

This banner by "American Israelis for Peace" is of course, not in North London.

But I wonder what would happen if it were displayed there.

None of the symbols are illegal (no, not even the Kabbalistic black magic Star of Ephraim) and as the banner's makers are Jews, it could hardly be called "anti-Semitic."

Yet you and I know that if such a banner were displayed in North London, the institutionally-pc police, acting on the orders of their bosses and the politicians (who meet for cosy chats at the Lodge), would probably say it was illegal on the grounds of racial aggravation or breaching the peace.

Kerching. Who pays the piper calls the tune.

Searchlight Get it Wrong: Stalinist Conspiracy Nutters Strike Again

2012-01-29T22:25:00.006Z

Searchlies get it oh so wrong - again!

An old friend (in the sense of our acquaintance rather than his age) sent me a link earlier today to a piece in Searchlies magazine which proposes a conspiracy involving the Front National, Vichy French "war criminals," all manner of "anti-Semites" (of course!), Traditionalist Catholics, a "New Right" faction, revisionists, Mosleyites, occultists and Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.

The article had as its bete noir, Bishop Williamson (oh they mentioned his dubious excommunication, but not that it had been publicly lifted) and yet they could not even get the right cleric in the photo accompanying the piece! Is it a case of "they all look the same to me guvnor?"

Such research. And they are the "experts" on "international fascism." As a Mr. F. Christmas might intone: "ho ho ho."

It's ages since I had such a good laugh. It reminded me of a piece in Searchlies years ago about the ITP which linked much of the above alongside Baltic nationalists, SS veterans, the IRA, the UDA, "violent" Pro-Lifers, skinheads, neo-nazis, British monarchists, and many others too. It was quite the roll call.

Dere wuz Nazis, priests, Vichy dudes, 911 deniers...

And they call us conspiracy theorists!

Anyhow, in the intro to this latest piece of drivel, it of course brings up the fact that the meeting/convention/conspiracy in question was held on Remembrance Sunday and how nationalists (sorry, "nazis") had for years "desecrated" Remembrance Sunday by marching to the cenotaph.

Now there a number of things here, not least the "freedom of speech" that we are supposed to have fought for. But think of the Stalinists/Communists and extreme Zionists that make up Searchlies, with their roots in the gangland sleazy underbelly of London's Soho and their hardline Stalinist cadre for many years. Democrats? Hmmm.

The writer John Mortimer QC, who was the creator of Rumpole of the Bailey, was giving a talk on his life to an audience, recorded for the radio, and in that he admitted that he, the only son of a barrister and public schoolboy at Harrow naturally became a member of the Communist Party (CP). He received letters from the 'Central Committee' of the CP - he joked that he was a "one man cell" at Harrow.

This was at the start of WW2, when Germany and Russia had signed a peace treaty, and so the letters Mortimer was receiving told him to "go slow" on production for the war. So the Communists were putting out the line that this was not a war they could in any way support.

This same fact is exposed in the autobiography I Believed by Douglas Hyde, who worked at the very highest levels of the CP, its inner sanctum if you will. He said that there was rank hypocrisy because the CP was arranging a "go slow" in 1940 and thereabouts and condemning Britain's war as a Capitalist war, whereas post June 1941 they completely changed tune.

Mortimer said that after June '41 he received the same letters from the CP asking him to urge flat-out production for the war effort. Of course he wasn't in a position to do much from the opulent halls of Harrow.

The Jewish author Arthur Koestler (who wrote The Thirteenth Tribe, detailing how most Jews were latter converts, and had no relation to Biblical Jewry) dealt with this in his (anti-nazi) book Scum of the Earth in which he attacked the CP in France. Interestingly although it was written in the Spring of 1941, the book was published after Operation Barbarossa started and the CP did a swift about-turn. Koestler stood by what he had written. The pacifists and saboteurs became war-mongers and factory cheerleaders.

Of course Communists (like Searchlies) prefer to ignore this, just as they and Capitalists prefer to forget the the Soviet Union invaded Poland on September 17th, 1939.

I have always wondered why Britain and France declared war on Germany just a few days after their invasion of Poland, yet they took no such action when the Soviet Union invaded and occupied the Eastern half of Poland (and the Baltic States).

Indeed, whilst fascists were rounded up and interned (in a concentration camp) in 1940 no such action was taken against the CP which was still free to mail-out to its members, asking them to "go slow" on war production. Some suggest that hardline Communists may even have sabotaged war production in order to help the USSR's then ally, 'Nazi' Germany. Why? Why did Soviet Russia and its acolytes abroad have such a charmed existence after it invaded Poland in 1939?

So the next time Searchlies witter on about "nazis" defiling the cenotaph, someone might ask them why Stalinists like them changed sides, and went from undermining the war effort to becoming "super patriots?" We might also ask why the Zionists at Searchlies pretend to salute the British Army for being the defenders of democracy, when Searchlies' comrades in Palestine were blowing up British servicemen and civilians in terror attacks in the 1940s. They even booby-trapped the bodies of dead soldiers in order to kill more, and so achieve their dream of a Jewish state on the graves of Brits and Arabs.

If that isn't good enough, ask the Reds who witter on about the cenotaph if they remember the dead killed fighting Communism in Korea? Or don't they include the Korean War dead when they talk of the cenotaph as a "sacred" place?

Douglas Hyde saw through the lies and spin of the CP in 1941 and left the CP.

John Mortimer QC saw through the lies and spin of the CP in 1941 and left the CP.

The only time the kooks at Searchlies ever left the CP was when the CP turned against their precious Israel. The Searchlies crew preferred hardline Zionism to hardline Communism, only to return to the Red Flag when hardline Reds (or those they could find) also accepted Zionism.

One wonders if they will oppose war with Iran, as so many Socialists seem likely to do, or urge it on as so many Zionists already are. Could it be that as with Searchlies so many internecine squabbles with their would-be allies in the left-wing and anti-racist ranks in the past, Searchlies will give first preference to Israel and that cause. Who knows... they may even condemn some fellow lefties as being "anti-Semites" as they did against Norwegian Communists just a few years back when they realised that top level bankers and the Neo Cons pushing war were of a certain type.

Indeed one may wonder that when they day comes that British soldiers stop being the cannon fodder of America's Israel lobby, how much longer Searchlies will treat the cenotaph as a Holy place which only the people they deem worthy should visit?

As FC exposed years ago, the people at Searchlies, the "defenders of democracy" are just as much hypocrites as the CP of the 1940s. They have included pimps, burglars, arsonists, extremist Reds, hardline Zionists and much more in their own ranks!

And when you see the conspiracies they dream up... it's a wonder anyone takes them seriously, at all.

The Season of Intolerance

2012-01-28T19:06:00.001Z

I said "civ-il-is-ation"

Stoopidist thing I heard for a looooong time today was an ITV News reporter outside the Queens Park Rangers (QPR) ground in West London, commenting on both the QPR v Chelsea and the Liverpool v Manchester United matches, and the furore surrounding them in regards to alleged "racism."

The reporter, brim full of white guilt, said it was "The Season of Intolerance."

Pass the sick bucket Mildred.

P.S. It's only football.

P.P.S. Yesterday was Holocaust Memorial Day. I forgot.

How Will America Create War with Iran? A Scenario

2012-01-28T11:00:00.000Z

Food for thought.

Nationalists must not be conned by Zionist warmongers.

Quote of the Week: Germaine Greer on Banking

2012-01-27T23:49:00.002Z

"Some people think charging interest itself is immoral...
"Banking was invented by the group of people who've been blamed for just about everything that's gone wrong for the last couple of millennia.
"So we do have to review banking."

Germaine Greer
Daily Politics (BBC1), 7th November 2011.

Final Conflict Online Shop Up and Running

2012-01-27T22:03:00.000Z

We've even got toddler's t-shirts

Some great news for everyone who's been asking: the Final Conflict online shop is finally up and running again.

We hope to edit it over the next week or so and bring it up to date, but in the meantime we would like you to make orders to top-up on books, stickers and all the collectibles you've been itching to get.

Some items you might be interested in:

The Protocols of Zion (in the books section)
FC Celtic Cross self-adhesive stickers (in the stickers section)
Codreanu poster - painting by English Nationalist (in posters section)
Celtic Cross Flag - in red or black (in flags section)
FC Mag back issues (in the FC Magazines section)

and we have loads of shirts, CDs, patches, keyrings, hats, stationery and more.

Please support FC by supporting the FC Online Shop.

We can take credit card payments and if you contact us (boadiceamc@hotmail.co.uk) we can give you details of how to make a paypal payment.

Thanks for your support.

---

A big thanks to our Comrade who solved the problem with the shop (and the others who helped along the way). It's at times of great difficulty you find out who your friends are.

Amat victoria curam

Video of Lawful Rebellion Against Council Tax Enforcement

2012-01-25T21:55:00.001Z

Lawful Rebellion, against commercial courts in defence of the Common Law, in action:

Not Paying the Council Tax in Cwmbran

2012-01-24T21:54:00.000Z

Council Tax: Won't Pay - to a Law with no justification!

The two security personnel, who were previously door monitors, arrived and approached RL with arms outstretched, ready to take hold of him. RL stepped back, and stated “Do not touch me; you will be committing common law assault in front of these witnesses (RL Pointed to us), to which I will take commercial remedy!” The door monitors advanced again, and again RL stated “Do not touch me! – Sir’s, I must warn you that if you lay a finger on me, I will seek remedy through the courts for a common assault upon my body!” again they moved forward slightly and RL said in a LOUD CLEAR voice “SIR! I DO NOT CONSENT TO BEING TOUCHED!” By this time, the recorder had stepped down and approached, and one of the door monitors asked him if RL could do that!!

See the full story below.

Link:
A Day in Cwmbran Magistrates Court for Council Tax

Institutional Anti-White Racism in the Police, Judiciary, Media and Political Classes

2012-01-24T16:16:00.000Z

This is a superb video which makes most/all of the points raised by FC over the years, including these key issues:

Loss of ancient rights viz Double Jeopardy (leading to possible State abuse of innocents).
Ridiculous subjective nature of "racial" incidents in law in favour of "ethnic minorities" and so discriminatory and hence probably illegal.
Media cover-up of racial attacks against whites (meaning an ipso facto racially-biased conspiracy across the media titles/channels).

Something is rotten in this system, and the law, politicians, police and media are involved!

We are the victims of this prejudice and slanted policing, non-reporting of crimes and a badly skewed criminal justice system.

Watch this video. Understand its implications. Tell others. Spread the word.

Discrimination, even against homosexual degenerates, is supposed to be illegal. Yet it is encouraged when it comes to the many white victims of the criminals amongst the guest 'communities' we have in this country.

Spread the word, if for no other reason than to remember the vicious murder of Kriss Donald, the Glaswegian 15 year-old boy tortured, murdered and burnt by Asian thugs. A vicious anti-white murder that the entire media decided we do not need to know about!

The Strathclyde Police admitted to dropping Operation Gadher which had acted against Asian gangs in the area. If it had been left open, this could have saved Kriss's life, but the police feared being labelled "racist" and so shut down the very Operation that could have stopped what is probably the worst racially motivated murder in the UK. The BBC itself admitted to under-reporting Kriss's murder.

These are just two prime examples of institutional political correctness which led to bad decisions which impacted on the crime itself and public knowledge of the crime! Why were these decisions made? Who stands to gain?

It is not illegal to ask these questions. It is not "hatred" to want to stop the murder of white people. It is not "racist" to fight for our streets to be safe from knife or gun crime.

The politicians often tell us we fight (needless and illegal/immoral) wars around the world to "keep the British people safe" and yet we are not safe! Not from "Muslim extremists" in Asia or the Middle East, but from the muggers, drugs gangs and the knife and gun wielding hoodlums that litter the streets of our cities.

Remember a few years back when the then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith took her armed protection officers with her on the streets of South London just to get a take away? Sadly most of us don't have that luxury, yet from their white-flight plush homes (in the case of Smith the luxuriousness of which was helped along by tax-payers' money she conned out of the MP's expenses system, yet miraculously evaded jail), the people who run the media, political machinery, courts and police, tell us continually how immigration has "enriched" us, whilst the rest of us have to take to the streets unprotected from gangs and suchlike.

If the politicians really want our people to be safe, then they should act here (not in Asia!) to stop attacks on people on the streets of London, Manchester, Birmingham etc.

And if they are serious about "stopping racist attacks" then why not come down hard on the many muggings, rapes, stabbings, shootings and other attacks carried out by "ethnic" criminals against indigenous people, whose only fault seems to be their ethnicity/identity.

Or is Stephen Lawrence more important than the many English, Scottish and Welsh victims of racially aggravated crimes (not treated as such by any layer of the establishment)? If so, why?

I believe we are looking at institutional anti-White racism at every level.

Many thanks to GriffinWatch for putting this video on their blog.

Obama the Satanist? Well...

2012-01-23T23:44:00.000Z

I don't tend to go for this stuff, even with the old ones like Led Zepellin, even though their occult links are well known.

But take a look. It's interesting...

Jews and Japs: Removal, Internment and War

2012-01-23T22:29:00.001Z

Germany 1935

The banner reads "Jews are not wanted here" and it hangs in Bavaria, Southern Germany in 1935.

Of course it is now proof that Germans wanted to kill all Jews and were really awful people, who needed a drastic lesson from the "democracies" a la Dresden February 1945.

What we're not told is that world Jewry declared war on Germany in 1933. Five years later, onNovember 7 1938, HerschelGrynszpan, a Jew, walked into theGerman embassy in Paris and shot Ernstvom Rath, a German diplomat, fivetimes. This led to anti-Jewish disturbances known as "kristallnacht" -- not unlike when Italian businesses had their windows put through in the UK when Italy joined WW2 on June 10th 1940 and riots broke out:

The terrified owners, many with British citizenship and having been resident in the British Isles (often for decades), were forced to barricade themselves into back rooms. The worst riots were in Liverpool, Cardiff, Swansea and Newport, all with large pre-war Italian populations.

There was also vicious anti-Italian rioting in Scotland.

England 1933

But back to 1938, after the German diplomat was shot, the leading Jewish activist group in Paris paid for all the legal costs of the terrorist Grynszpan as David Irving explains here. Join the dots...

Now move forward a few years and Japan declares war on America and launches a military strike on Pearl Harbour.

Were the Americans plotting to murder all the Japanese (including alien, Americanised and mixed race Japanese) men, women and children that it herded into concentration camps?

America 1941

Perhaps if America were bombed into oblivion, had its food supplies and railways cut, then (as in the Confederate-era prison camps) the Japanese internees would also have come out suffering dysentery, cholera and other diseases leaving some of them looking skeletal (whilst others looked completely normal).

We need to put aside many decades of WW2 propaganda, and ongoing Zionist propaganda, and look at the history of the various nations in those dark times. No one has clean hands, all were prone to kneejerk reactions to acts of aggression by "the enemy."

Here we see a headline celebrating the removal of 'Japs' to concentration camps, and yet a similar German headline of the removal of all Jews would stand as evidence of the holocaust.

Link:
Photos of American Concentration Camp for Japanese

Change We Can't Believe in!

2012-01-22T15:47:00.000Z

This says it all!

Thanks to News From Atlantis

Not so much "Yes We Can" as Yes They Have (Again).

Milibands Show That Politics Remains a Con

2012-01-22T14:00:00.001Z

There's a few stories floating around today about the Miliband brothers.

One is that David, who wanted to be Labour Party leader but failed, is now working for a City firm, making big money.

Brothers in arms?

The other is that Ed, who won the Labour Party leadership, is pictured getting into a flash sports care carrying a "green" shopping bag.

This all shows a number of things:

The political 'leaders' all come from the same mould.
They think they are doing us "a favour" by not taking mega-bucks jobs and 'slumming it' in Westminster for a few hundred grand a year.
Their friends and associates belong to the mega-bucks world, so they have no knowledge of normal life, of struggling to pay bills, of living in low-cost housing in the multi-culti hell they have created.
That they can walk out of politics to plush jobs and placements. The more bankers etc. they help while in power, the more rewards they stand to get afterwards.
These people - as politicos or financiers - jet around the world, yet lecture us on turning off light bulbs to 'save the planet.'
They will carry "green" shopping bags whilst using "gas guzzling" super cars.

That is the world of the political elite. Just as when they start their foreign wars, sending in troops to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria (resulting in countless tens of thousands of innocent deaths), they sit safely back in Westminster plotting their non-executive placements. They talk of 'feeling the pain' of ordinary people, yet give knighthoods to usurers that cause debt.

It is all a con.

Of course the Milibands are the offspring of extremist Jewish Marxists, but they have embraced Capitalist greed, Zionist wars and the same old cycle of betrayal and reward.

It is a world of hypocrisy and hyperbole, of do as I say, not as I do, of practicing never ending war whilst preaching 'climate change' and one world humanism. And the Milibands fit in just fine and dandy.

BBC's Syrian Brainwashing: Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad

2012-01-21T18:02:00.000Z

How the BBC Works

On the BBC last night there were two news stories.

In one, balaclava clad men were using weapons against the army of the state they grew up in. The army of that state were fighting back against them, sending troops into their towns. The balaclava clad men, who shot at state soldiers, were the heroes for the BBC, who showed them being cheered on, by only a couple of hundred people at most, in a town.

BBC's freedom fighter?

In the next story some balaclava clad men were using weapons against the army of the state they grew up in. The army of that state were fighting back sending troops into their towns. The balaclava men, who shot at state soldiers, were the terrorists for the BBC, who said they 'only enjoyed support in a few enclaves.'

One of these stories was about Syria and the Free Syrian Army which shoots Syrian soldiers (and civilians) and the other was about Northern Ireland and the Real IRA which shoots British soldiers (and civilians).

Yet the BBC tells us one are heroes, freedom fighters, brave patriots fighting occupation and oppression, whilst the others are extremists, terrorists, murderers seeking to upset peace, opposed by the majority and with no justification in their actions. The language in one report is a complete reversal of the language in the other report, which goes to show how the BBC plays the British public, pushing us to support "balaclava men" when it suits them, the Secret State and the political classes, but to oppose "balaclava men" that suits all those vested interests.

Funnily enough, in the latest Private Eye there is a report on how the British Ambassador to Bahrain sent out a statement congratulating Bahrain for putting down its uprising, and stating how Saudi Arabia was correct to send in vehicles and men to help put down the uprising. The same British State is now busy telling us how wrong Syria is to try and put down its own uprising!

Or let's put it this way, when does the BBC think an Arab with a bazooka is good: when he's killing Syrian troops. Would they say the same if he was killing Israeli, Iraqi, Afghani or Saudi troops?

So to recap, it's Syrian armed insurrectionists good, Irish armed insurrectionists bad.

Bahraini/Saudi crushing rebellion good, Syrian crushing rebellion bad.

And what's the news just in: four legs good, two legs bad?

Just so long as the BBC is there to tell us!

When All Seems Lost... Change We Can Believe in

2012-01-20T16:52:00.000Z

The Spanish did it!

We can do it!

We too, like the Spaniards, must make ours a Holy Crusade.

Like the Spaniards we must root out the Talmudic fifth column.

Let the Reconquest begin.

Time for a Holocaust Musical? We've had Everything Else...

2012-01-20T13:01:00.000Z

It was Ricky Gervais's and Stephen Merchant's series Extras which ran the episode in which it was stated that a film about the holohoax guarantees an Oscar. Now there's a truism.

Whilst an extremely well made and extremely popular film about Jesus Christ (The Passion of The Christ) was deliberately blocked by distributors and from the main Oscar awards, every big film about the holohoax, in reality war and pro-Israeli propaganda being relived time and time again for various vested interests (which Norman Finkelstein has labelled the "Holocaust Industry"), is a virtual shoe-in for an Oscar.

We have even had a Jewish film maker (Mel 'Brooks' Kaminsky) make a musical comedy (The Producers) about the Third Reich (not to mention Tarantino's "torture porn" and semi-sexual fantasies of Inglorious Basterds). So how far away are we from a musical comedy about the holocaust?

Cue the Evil German and the Avaricious Collaborators

Oh sure the usual people who decry it as "insensitive," but in reality they would love it as it would remind us all of how Jews (and no-one else?) suffered in WW2, how the deliberate industrial-scale mass extermination of Jews was a policy of the Third Reich, and bring the holohoax to a whole new level of people who might never watch The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas or The Reader.

Too low? Really? I don't think it would be too low for them - we are talking of a group of people who insist on the holohoax being a shoe-in on any historical film, whether it is sexual (The Reader), about children (...Striped Pyjamas), a musical (The Producers), violent and retributive (Inglorious...), about "good" Germans (Schinler's List), about rebellion (Defiance) or even about Science Fiction (X Men).

Every angle has been covered. On the other hand Communism killed circa 100 million people in the 20th Century, but you'd be hard-pressed to find any major film, certainly any Hollywood blockbuster or Oscar-nominee, which tackled the torture, starvation, death and gulags of Communism (be it Soviet or other).

Is it cos I is Christian?

One might surmise why this is: the victims were Christians, Communism was Jewish (as Winston Churchill pointed out). Indeed, Michael Hoffman has written how the mass murderers of Communism transformed themselves into "holocaust survivors" in one fell swoop.

Meanwhile in America various people, from ADL boss Abe Foxman to actor Marlon Brando have stated that Jews run Hollywood. The difference is that when folks like Joel Stein say it they are cheered, when gentiles like Brando or Gibson say it their careers are attacked.

"The Jews are so dominant," writes [LA Times columnist] Joel Stein, "I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies." "But lo and behold," Stein says, "even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew!"

"As a proud Jew," says Stein, "I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood."

So if the powers-that-be (aka the you-know-who's) decide we need an all musical on the holocaust - we'll get it, along with a media kerfuffle designed to make it a household subject again.

Link:
Jews on Hollywood/Media Control

Kevan Bleach - A Family Prayer Card

2012-01-19T17:07:00.001Z

Kevan Bleach was a great supporter of FC, and always took a keen interest in Nationalism, Distributism etc.

FC reported his sad death back last year.

Here is a prayer card produced by his family, who are surely all in our thoughts and prayers now, especially his widow Susan and his children and grandchildren.

He really will be missed by many. He was a "decent bloke," extremely likable, intelligent and down-to-earth. We all too often write about or come across the clowns, cowards, sell-outs, drunkards and similar who infest nationalism, dishonouring it and dragging it down with their puerile antics.

What nationalism and England lack are the men of goodwill, men of decency, men of probity. Men like Kevan.

Dr Kevan Bleach, R.I.P.

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord,
and let perpetual light shine upon him.

BBC Exposes Special Forces Role in Libyan Rebellion

2012-01-18T22:43:00.000Z

Tonight's Newsnight on BBC2 has detailed some of the "boots on the ground" missions of 'special forces' in Libya during its civil war/uprising.

One thing's for sure - the full extent of black ops and other special operations in Libya won't be exposed by the BBC, for fear of showing the world exactly who lead the rebellion, who gave the spearheads to the teams of rapists that descended on Tripoli, who lead the artillery which bombarded towns like Sirte (killing civilians!).

This is just the thin end of the wedge- nevertheless, it does show that the Tories, like NuLab before them have lied when it comes to overthrowing regimes it does not approve of.

When, if ever, will we find out about special ops in Syria to stir up the rebels there...

And All for a Cup of Tea!

2012-01-18T10:18:00.001Z

"Damn it all Lionel, this beastly Kosher business simply has to end!"

"Calm down dear, two sugars in mine."

Local Politics Versus Party Politics

2012-01-18T01:01:00.000Z

Cllr Tom Bates

I came across this interesting quote from a Councillor Tom Bates on the interweb:

Too many councillors make decisions they know are not the right choice but do so simply because they have been ordered to by the political parties they happen to represent. I firmly believe local councillors have a duty to put the interests of local residents before the interests of political parties.

Sounds very much akin to what Third Positionists have been saying since the 80s.

The whole 'party system' with its whips to keep its members voting on party lines, often to obey vested interests and not local peoples' interests, has long been a con.

As long as objective truth is not turned on its head (e.g. one cannot vote that faggotry is correct, coloured immigration beneficial or similar -- but these shouldn't normally come into local politics anyway), then local councillors should not be parts of political party machinery because keeping local parks open, funding libraries, caring for schools and keeping the streets clean does not require an ideology per se, it requires that local councillors do what local tax-payers ask them to do!

If a Labour Council leader obeys a Labour Party ruling and votes against the interests of local people, then that leaves any pretence of "democracy" dead in the water. If local representatives (who should truly represent) want to join bodies, they should form tradesmen guilds or similar to defend the interests of local businesses etc. Third Positionists have also long argued that local politicians should be recallable if they go against the interests of local communities -- making them truly accountable to the people.

You not only do not need political parties in local politics, but they undermine local politics, setting up voting blocs, covering up sleaze and tit-for-tat decisions etc.

So well done Cllr Bates. If only some Tories, Labour and Libs would follow his example...

Workers of the World Unite - You Need More Slavery & Bosses

2012-01-15T16:36:00.000Z

1898 artwork by Caran D'Ache

This artwork is very interesting.

In the first picture the worker is under the weight of the monarchy/rich.

Interestingly we see the Church in the background. Today of course Communists (founded and egged on by Anti-Christ Talmudics) and atheists (ditto) say the Church suppressed the workers on behalf of the rich.

As anyone who has studied history and Church teaching knows, the Church acted as Europe's conscience, pushing the rich to give alms to the poor. The church provided hospitals for the sick and infirm, provided peppercorn rents for workers (who would, post-Reformation be thrown of the land, which the uncontrolled rich enclosed*)

Just as things worsened for the poor after the Reformation, when the King, monarchy and rich were no longer controlled by the Church and its laws, so after the French Revolution they worsened considerably.

In D'Ache's picture we see the Royalty replaced by the bankers, Freemasons and rich; whilst their daily toil did not improve or worsened under the weight of the new elites.

This is the reality. The rulers had to jettison Christianity's hold over society - and especially its ethical and moral rules on economics and commerce, which allowed Capitalism to rise, with its new elites based on money-power, usury and greed. This in turn was used by the Judeo-Masons as an excuse to organise Communist groups as the "answer" to the slums and poor conditions created by Capitalism.

Communism, of course, does not give freedom, but yet more slavery, more despots, more centralised wealth, and so the con goes on, mirrored today in the Left V Right see-saw of politics. Taxes continue, Usury and Bank-Cons go on, immoral anti-family laws roll on...

And the poor, hard-working people plod on under the weight.

Of course, back in the day I suppose the bankers and reds never had Eastenders to tell the dim-witted what was right or acceptable.

* Read William Cobbett's History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland for a superb socio-economic analysis of these events (btw Cobbett was not a Catholic).

Stephen Spielberg's Big Holocaust Lie- Exposed

2012-01-15T14:00:00.000Z

Spielberg's The Last Days film got an Academy Award (Schindler's List of course won "best film").

Whereas The Passion of the Christ was, according to the LA Times "shut out of contention for Oscar's biggest honors."

See this wonderful documentary here

It is clear that Hollywood is fighting a (anti) Cultural war for the "holocaust industry" and against Christianity. How else can we explain the fact that "holocaust" films get lauded and given gongs, whereas one single film that tells the history of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ gets brickbats, smears, blockades and attacks by the media, the "experts" and the "hate watchers."

Many thanks to News From Atlantis blog for bringing this to the blogosphere's attention. The video contains absolute proof of the lies told by a minority of survivors as they climb aboard the 'holocaust industry' gravy train.

75 Years On: Spanish Civil War Martyrs Remembered

2012-01-14T19:41:00.000Z

With thanks to Thought and Action blog:

Mota and Marin died 75 years ago yesterday,the 13th January 1937, fighting on the front line of the Spanish War for Liberation at Majadahonda, near Madrid.

They were members (Mota was deputy-leader) of Codreanu's Iron Guard who volunteered to fight side by side with the Spaniards, Italians, Germans, Irish and others who went to Spain to fight for Christianity, Nationalism and Freedom.

This video has a lot interesting images of Legionary and Falange activities and actions at the Legionaries' memorial.

When our online shop is back up and running (soon we hope!) we have small frameable prints of the Majadahonda monument which will be available.

Socialist, Communist and Anarchist Slogans Interpretated

2012-01-14T18:05:00.001Z

"Bigger State! Bigger State!"

The Fourth International is not the latest play-off match for the world cup.

Das Kapital is not Berlin.

No Pasaran - and no it's not Paris either.

Stop the Cuts is not an anti-guillotine retrospective

No war but the class war is not a pacifist slogan of inner city teachers.

You Have Nothing to Lose But Your Chains is it an airport warning notice to S&M deviants?

Such a good slogan he grabbed a few

Lenin lived, Lenin lives, Lenin will live! is not a Dr Frankenstein manifesto promise.

Tax the Rich and everyone else to the hilt to pay for shysters.

LGBT isn't the Lettuce, Granary, Bacon and Tomato sandwich appreciation society?

Troops Out is not a call for new pink uniforms for LGBT soldiers.

Right to Work and the biggest right not to work!

This Comrade was expelled for just not trying!

Capitalism Kills as much as Communism and Atheism (slogan of the Jealous League).

Smash the State because an even bigger State is needed.

No Justice No Peace, Lord Justice No-Peace QC didn't go along with the MacPherson Report which he called a chip-on-shoulder immigrants' charter. Boo.

Property is Theft is why no Anarcho-Reds live in posh houses (Islington, Chiswick, Golders Green etc.)!

Not the Church Not the State, Women Must Decide Their Fate and what's for tea, oh no not egg and chips again?

and not forgetting: More gulags, grey blocks of flats and queues for food, and less nice stuff, which is surprisingly honest.

Now send in your leftie slogans and possible interpretations. And make them fun, fun, fun!

(no swear words please)

And for some real fun look at this lefty forum site Urban 75 to see how even lefties argue amongst themselves about their "No Borders" slogan and policy. Should the proles get wound up by lefties shouting "no borders" before returning to mummy and daddy's white-flight rural retreat for the holidays or should they cover up their beliefs and go for something more populist and so not frighten the genuine workers?

Mitt Romney: Another Neo Con, Zionist, Israeli Lobby Puppet

2012-01-12T16:27:00.000Z

Zionbot 4.0 ~~Kisses Arse~~ Meets War Criminal

You wonder why Mitt Romney is being promoted? You wonder why someone with no clear ideas, only meaningless soundbites, is ahead in the polls:

Mitt Romney's Ties to Israeli Intelligence

Thanks to Thought and Action Blog for this. Click on the link to see his Israeli handler - my God but she's ugly!

Seems Israel want to control their "allies" and bomb their enemies. Schoolyard bully buying their friends and bullying their foes.

Homosexuals "Good" - Paedos Next...

2012-01-11T21:09:00.000Z

Decades of media and school brainwashing in the USA

News in that in Greece (under an IMF autocracy) that paedophiles are to get some sort of disability allowance. How long before they get 'disability rights?'

Queers are already agitating for a younger age of consent. Meanwhile (excuse the pun) the judiciary treat paedo's with kid gloves.

I would argue in an age in which homosexuality is considered 'normal' (by those who make the laws and run the media) it is obvious that, sooner or later, paedophilia will also be normalised, perhaps on a sliding scale.

On the BBC News at 6 there was a report of how a 13 year old boy went onto some website (Bebo?) and wrote that he was a pooftah. Right away an older man was arranging meet-ups for sexual reasons. He said he was in his late 20s. The police said he was in his 40s.

There have been many people who have spoken up, daring to say that most paedophilia is, in the vast majority of cases, a homosexual offshoot. Sadly, instead of looking into the facts and seeking to root out the scourge of paedophilia, all we get are excuses and cover-ups... because nothing is ever allowed (be it personal, societal, medical or other evidence) to undermine the degenerate campaign of the homosexual lobby and their political 'fellow travellers' who have even succeeded in shutting down Christian adoption agencies!

That is where we are as a society. Even in times of cutbacks, tax-payer money is poured into supporting pro-homosexual initiatives, but adoption agencies who refuse to acknowledge homosexuals as if they are married couples get shut down.

Absolutely bloody crazy!

Graph from Dusk in Autumn Blog
Huffington Post Exposes Greek Stance on Paedophilia.

Bob 'TV Nazi' Holness, St Stephan Lawrence and Murdered Arabs

2012-01-11T17:48:00.000Z

Bob "Der Fuhrer" Holness

It is a little known fact that some people made official complaints to ITV (or whatever it was called back then) about the (recently deceased) Blockbuster host Bob Holness. It seemed on greeting new contestants he would fling his arm up in the air and they said this was "nazi".

Can I Have a P Please Adolf?

Is there nothing more absurd in this world?

Just the other day I saw a tweet from the Holocaust Educational Trust babbling on about Stephan Lawrence, and how terrible his murder was etc. etc. These are the same people who treat the mass murder, concentration camps, torture, expulsion and discriminatory laws used against the Palestinian people for over half a century as perfectly fine, and any attempt to equate that or the murder of millions by the Communists with their HolyHoax is itself a "hate crime" and proof of "anti-Semitism."

Ed Balls on his Blackbusters policy

Yet the wily old Zionoid was free to equate St Stephen Lawrence with his aged hoax, because he chose to do so, and he no doubt thinks this will 'lift up' his HolyHoax. Heaven forbid that we European-Whites should ever treat the non-European guests in Europe as badly as the Jewish "Israelis" treat the indigenous Arabs of those parts! And yet we patriots are lambasted for our "racism" when we say we are against coloured immigration by the very same vested interests who come out with the old canard that Israel is an "island of democracy." You couldn't make it up!

Isn't it funny that millions of Rwandans and Ukrainians can be wiped out, or an entire nation like Armenia obliterated, and the HolyHoax always retains it's topmost place, being taught in our schools (when we had no role other than to "liberate" Jewry). To try and equate their Holyhoax with anything else (even the 100 million killed by Communism) has been condemned by St Deborah Lipstadt as a form of anti-Semitism.

Having their Kosher-Cake and Eating It

Yet when it suits their aims and they want to look "all inclusive," instead of practising racial separatism and having some of the strictest racial laws in their own artificial homeland (their ownership of which is based on a covenant they broke when Christ was murdered; not including the many Jews who converted to Talmudism of the Pharisees and Kabbalistic Black Magic since then), then they are happy to equate their Holyhoax with the murder of a single individual or the strange arm greeting of a TV gameshow host!

Killing time until Blockbusters was on

But don't ever say to the self-chosen few who run the Holocaust Industry (who will even call Jews who question what they do "anti-Semitic") that the wanton murder of a single Palestinian by racist Jews, or the bizarre behaviour of anyone (let along a TV show host) could be equated to the HolyHoax, for then you too will be an "anti-Semite."

It's all so very two legs good, four legs bad... Two legs good, four legs bad... Four legs good, two legs bad...

Isn't it?

Distributism: A Movement Whose Time Has Come

2012-01-10T22:27:00.001Z

This says it all.

When usury-bankers have created a huge financial mess.

When politicians care more about their own benefits than the Common Good.

When the police let criminals rule the streets whilst building a Police State.

When media hacks make up stories and spy on people to make a quick buck.

When the family collapses under immorality, amorality, a culture of death and government tactics.

When centralisation of government and banks in Euroland results in debt and slavery.

When plurality and moral chaos replace Christianity and tradition.

It's time for Common Sense.

Liberals & Socialists Don't Care About White Victims of Racial Attacks or Black Victims of Gangstas

2012-01-04T10:01:00.002Z

Richard Everitt, long forgotten

So two men have been found guilty of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. Did they do it? I don't know. What I do know is that it would be almost impossible for them to get a "fair trial" given the trial by jury over the years. But leaving that and the huge police operation to spy on them detailed in some of today's media, the chief victim in all of this, is English justice.

Double jeopardy is a long-established part of the justice system. Or rather it was. The idea was that it stopped a person being tried again and again for the same crime. I like to think of its overturning as the "EU approach" - i.e. if the system doesn't get the result it thinks is right, it goes for trial again, and again... until it gets the result it wants.

This could lead to someone whom the system opposes being tried over and over and over. The English were sensible enough to know that this could lead to tyranny and victimisation. Dumbed down by Eastenders and Fleet Street editorials, the establishment has now destroyed hundreds of years of protection from tyranny.

Dobson was previously tried and the chief witness's evidence collapsed and it was found to be so unreliable.

I do not know if the two men are murderers, but English justice has been hacked to bits. Close on a thousand years of rights and defences against tyranny have been discarded on the say-so of a team who put together the MacPherson Report (MR) - and listening to them in the media, they are the usual White-guilt, White-flight liberals and rich idiots who have probably never lived on a mixed-race estate and who always rip apart our traditions to "make things better."

When overwhelmingly coloured (Ooops, they don't like that term, I'd better say COLOURED) rioters took to the streets of London one of the MR bods wept how blacks were still being mistreated by the police. That's how these idiots work. Criminals riot and it's "oooh. poor criminals." Muggings go on, shootings go on, knifings go on.

Bizarrely enough quite a few of the people killed by black knife and gun carrying hoodlums (as well as the white victims of racist attacks, few of whose names are known by Lord Liberalpants or Quentin Whiteguilt QC) are themselves blacks.

Many blacks in London cry out for help when their sons and brothers are killed by "gangstas" and want the police to act against the "gangstas" yet when they do the white liberals and black political agitators stir it up by calling stop and search a 'racist' modus operandi.

How else do they expect the knives and guns to be taken off the streets? Do they think the "gangstas" will voluntarily hand over their weapons and stop carrying out racial attacks, or murdering black kids, or pushing drugs, or mugging the innocent?

More innocent black teens have been murdered in London by black "gangstas" than by "white racist gangs" yet where are the political agitators, socialist rent-a-mobs and white-flight liberals, Lords and QCs demanding action against the "gangstas?" Is it cos they is black?

Yet if we wonder at these peoples' kid-glove treatment of the gangs that commit the vast majority of gun and knife crime across London (not to mention sell the drugs that create so much misery and cause so much crime, e.g. robbery and muggings), we should be dumbstruck at their treatment of the White victims of racial attacks by coloureds.

They quite frankly do not care. They do not even know their names. Nor the numbers of Whites murdered by non-Whites. Nor the fact that many/most of these crimes are not treated as racial attacks. Nor the fact (see link below) that most victims of racial attacks are WHITE.

As a test I went onto Twitter yesterday and sought out a suitable twit. There was one, a tweet sent between two users, one with 'socialist' in his user-name, twittering about the terrible murder of Stephen Lawrence and hurrah for the guilty verdict.

I asked the sender what about the White victims of racial attacks. despite stating that they campaign on all victims of racial attacks, @markwrightuk88 ("Socialist Party member") could not name a single, solitary White victim of a racial attack, let alone one that he (in all his hideous whiteness) had campaigned for justice for, or campaigned against the coloured criminal murderers.

And that speaks volumes. That is the reality on da streets innit.

Link:
Even Liberals Admit: Most Race Victims are WHITE

Tesco's Back Down on Poof-Fest - Keep Up the Pressure

2012-01-03T10:58:00.001Z

Plenty to lose...

After a concerted campaign, Tesco's have backed down from an ongoing sponsorship deal with the London Walking Around with Our Arses Hanging Out, Leather Clad Degenerate Scumbags and Pierced Butch Dykes Rally (aka London "Pride").

This followed their decision to stop sponsoring events by a cancer charity, and the remarks of one of their head honchos that Christians opposed to "homosexual marriage" [sic] were extremists.

As the commentator Francis Phillips explains, they will still back sodomite groups, they will still back the poof rally this year and (to my knowledge) they have not sacked their R&D boss who made the comments against Christians.

So at the very least all decent people should continue boycotting Tesco's during 2012 - and if you get the chance tell them why.

Even more reasons to "send 'em back!"

They could have pulled the plug on the homo-fest this year (which breaks the law on public decency and blasphemy every year), but have chosen to stand by it.

So whilst this is a great victory, and shows what can be done with some well concerted pressure by the majority against a shrill but bank-rolled minority of degenerates, we must not be complacent.

Keep up the pressure and keep up the boycott, at least during 2012, and be ready with the next campaign. The next business that thinks it can promote sodomites and undermine our values must feel the wrath of the "men of goodwill" via pushing our message out on friendly blogs, websites and all the usual social media channels (not to mention sending emails to the companies in question).

It's a battle won. But the war goes on.

Change We Can Believe In? Obama's Betrayed Turn to Ron Paul

2012-01-03T10:32:00.000Z

After being betrayed by (more war, more banks, more Israel, more welfare) Obama, how many "radicals" searching for answers as the banking crisis forces billions into welfare dependency, will come across the anti-usury, anti-fractional reserve banking message of patriots?

The media hate Ron Paul in reality because he is anti-interventionist in the Middle east and far from being a rabid Zionist (a must-do stance for all US Presidents), but again, to the young, idealistic voters and activists this can only be a good thing, and even most "right wing" republicans know, in their hearts, that America needs to be far more isolationist after the disasters of Iraq and Afghanistan.

of course because he is not a Zionist and has real answers to the banking crisis, the media and the parties will paint Ron Paul as "dangerous" but in the internet age, enquiring youngsters will only be spurred on to read for themselves what he has to say on the banks and Israel, and then wonder why this is so "dangerous" after all.

No one is suggesting Ron Paul has all the answers, but he is several steps down the right road.

What a shame that "patriots" in the UK are so consumed by "muzzies" that the perfect storm of the banking crisis has found them in a position unwilling or unable to 'capitalise' on the crisis - a sin of commission or omission?

Young people in 'the West' are looking for answers. They won't find it in a movement which, from the outside looks like a reactionary right-wing defender of the State (and status quo) and a drum-beater for Israel.

Change We Can Believe In? Maybe in America... not yet in Britain.

Link:
Young Flock to Ron Paul's Message

Advertising with Otto Skorzeny

2012-01-02T22:42:00.001Z

In the style of an M&S advert:

This isn't just a daring rescue. This isn't just a daring behind the lines secret mission.

These are heroic, tantalising, breathtaking, inspiring Otto Skorzeny ventures brought to you by the Waffen SS!

Advert Man Promotes Skorzeny

Ex-NF Activist Who Says He Worked for SB and Mossad

2012-01-01T23:50:00.001Z

Druggie, traitor and weirdo

Ex "hardman" Carl Clark, of unnamed "Irish terrorist loyalist groups" (?) and the National Front, worked for the Special Branch and Mossad according to this happy clappy site: Network Norwich and Norfolk

The media has us think that the secret state and Israeli spies are not interested in "fringe" groups on the "right wing" in the UK.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

If anyone out there knows the story of this charming gent or his trail of connections please let us know.

What's particularly interesting is that he was involved in drug-running. He doesn't mention for whom. The syntax, grammar and names in the article are especially bad and in a few places make little sense.

As we have said time and time again, drugs have no place in nationalism and if you see "nationalists" involved in drugs, we advise you very strongly to steer well clear.

It is more than likely this Walter Mitty character was feeding info to the enemies of nationalism for his drugs money, or to escape a sentence for drug pushing. Who knows...

Child Abuse, Rape and More Covered Up: In the Name of Liberalism

2011-12-30T19:29:00.000Z

Imagine an organisation which knowingly covers up child abuse.

An organisation which hides serious medicines and surgery (which may have long-term medical and psychological effects) from school children's parents.

An organisation that fails to report rape.

Worse still the organisation makes vast profits from its criminal cover-ups and even gets state funding!

Wouldn't there be a public outrage? Indignation from the media which usually loves exposing scandals?

Not when there's a central tenet of liberalism to protect!.

The money, backing and media-silence will continue because they have a civilisation to wreck and generations to ruin (and lots and lots of money to make!)

Go see: The Mona Lisa Project

BOYCOTT TESCO'S Christians Opposed to 'Gay Marriage' are not EVIL

2011-12-27T01:22:00.002Z

Tesco's head of research and development, Nick Lansley, has said that those Christians who oppose "gay marriage" (sic) are "evil."

Not wrong. Not misguided. Not mistaken. EVIL.

May I suggest that everyone who is opposed to "gay marriage" do not step foot inside Tesco's from now on!

We cannot allow people who are defending the sanctity of marriage to be abused in this way by a head honcho at Tesco's, who would no doubt be sacked if he said homosexuality was disordered and laws promoting "homosexual equality" were evil. As it was, he was not sacked for his perverted views against a majority of Christians, who are still a majority in the UK.

It is time for all of us to make a stand and this is something which everyone of us can do, and we can get our friends and relatives to do it too.

It's no big deal. Even if it's just pointing them towards some other supermarket. It is one single step, not perfect, but it might make a difference. Tell your friends and relatives. If you attend a church, spread the word there too, even ask for a small notice to be put on the noticeboard or in the newsletter.

It may not change the world, but we must empower those people who are sick of the onslaught against marriage, our Faith and our traditions so that we become an army of people who make the money men realise they cannot attack us with impunity.

Every time they speak out: we must be there. Every assault on our way of life: we must repel.

In this times when money is an even more precious commodity for families and businesses, let's hurt these callous scumbags where it hurts - in their tills.

Every family turned away from Tesco's is £80 - £150 pounds per week taken out of their grasp.

SPREAD THE WORD. Shop elsewhere. Get friends, relatives, work colleagues, members of your community to shop elsewhere.

Bring this up in conversations over the garden fence, at the water cooler. Publish it on your blog, in facebook, on twitter and wherever else you can spread the word to as many people as possible.

We will not be attacked. We will not be besmirched. Will will not face the calumnies of big businessmen and the pink mafia.

Will will defend marriage. And we will boycott Tesco's.

Thanks to Integrity and Action blog for passing on this story.

To quote their blog entry:

A study last month showed that only six places of worship out of more than 40,000 across the country want to host civil partnership ceremonies.

Give it a few years and this will be foisted on more and more churches! That is how the liberal sickness and moral cancer spreads. Unless we draw the line in the sand today.

Stabbings in London's West End

2011-12-26T22:47:00.000Z

Consumerism, multi-culturalism, gang culture?

Oxford Street Boxing Day crowds - Whites are a minority

What was behind the stabbings and murder in London's West End which started when "two groups of youths" (media/police code for West Indians, usually) argued in the trainer shop Foot Locker?

A fight over the latest fashion of training shoes? An argument over "respect?" Or a post code gang fight?

What's for sure is that the norms of society are falling apart and our politicians are powerless to stop this kind of nonsense. More liberal, 60s failed dogma wll not solve this mess.

Consumerism, multi-culturalism, gang culture -- all have to go if we are to stop more violence and nihilism, whether it's Summer riots or Boxing Day stabbings.

Who the hell goes shopping with a concealed weapon? It's time to end the chaos.

Link:
Oxford Street Stabbings

Merry Christmas

2011-12-25T15:57:00.000Z

A very Merry Christmas to all FC readers and supporters.

Remember: This is the first day of Christmas. There are another eleven to go. Don't let the Talmudists and their puppets take Christmas from you.

Christmas 1862: The Bonnie Blue Flag

2011-12-24T00:17:00.001Z

BBC Inside-Job Conspiracy Theory - on 911 or Syria Bombs?

2011-12-23T23:29:00.001Z

Bombs in Damascas: BBC reports they could be a government "inside job."
Bombs (airplanes) in New York: BBC attack 'conspiracies' of a government "inside job."

As always, it's not so much as what the facts are, but what suits the ZIONIST agenda.

Open your eyes to media lies.

Narnia, Nick Clegg and Why 70% Need to Fight Back

2011-12-23T22:17:00.000Z

Offensive? Hardly!

Putting my feet up today, I took the opportunity to watch the latest Narnia film, The Voyage of the Dawntreader. The critics had slammed the film, so I wasn't expecting Braveheart or anything. Yet I was pleasantly surprised.

It kind of reminded me of the pooh-poohing of the original Narnia film, the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe. This seemed to have more to do with the film's 'Christian themes' than the quality of the film itself which was pretty good.

While "the critics" heap praise on films that promote all manner of twisted agendas, outright blasphemy, and even the "torture porn" of films like the Saw series (by Eli Roth), we are supposed to join in their contempt for any film that features Christian themes. Not even overtly Christian films like The Passion of the Christ (which they loathed!) but simply films with Christian 'themes.'

They act like Nick Clegg coming across a 'traditional' family, curling his lip and dismissing them as "from the 50s" (does he mean the 1850s, 1550s, 850s or any other century when the family existed and wasn't "same sex oriented etc. etc.?)

Why is that? Is this because we are facing a cultural war by the offspring of the 1960s Marxist 'Frankfurt School'? When the family and Christianity is to be sneered at - but anything that promotes homosexuality, multi-culturalism and atheism is to be cheered from the rooftops.

I read online that a report says that Christians count for 70% of the UK population, whilst atheists and agnostics number 20%. You wouldn't think so to look at the media. The output, especially through the BBC, political, cultural and current event programmes, is vehemently atheist and anti-Christian.

Isn't it time that we all - nationalists, patriots and 'men of goodwill' - started fighting back, in whatever way we can, to undermine the ringleaders of the 20%, the militant atheists and Marxists, who are seeking to further undermine our Christian heritage and removing the family as the bedrock of any sane nation?

Their sneering at our families, and their pouring scorn on anything of value is an affront to decency. We must all fight back, within our families, within our communities.

They are cultural Commissars and like the Bolshevik atheist ones of 90 years ago their goal is to destroy anything decent. Enough is enough.

---

P.S. The author of the Narnia books, C.S. Lewis, cited G.K. Chesterton as a major reason for his embracing Christianity. If you get the chance read C.S. Lewis's The Screwtape Letters, they are very enjoyable and somewhat informative! To understand GKC's influence, read Orthodoxy a book he wrote before his own conversion.

Support FC - Spread the Word

2011-12-22T23:07:00.000Z

A great way to support FC, educate fellow nationalists and ensure more of them know there is a sane alternative to the right-wing Neo Con nonsense that's been spread for years, is to distribute back copies of FC magazine.

For £7 we will send you [post included in the UK] 5 copies of an FC issue. For 10 copies it's £13, and for 20 copies it's just £21.

Great for selling or handing out at functions, on activities, to local supporters etc.

If you'd like to help us - and help nationalism - in this way, please drop us a line c/o eastender77@hotmail.co.uk

Thanks for your support.

Immigration System is Bu##ered

2011-12-20T16:49:00.002Z

Remember the recent brouhaha over the dodgy illegal immigrant who could stay in the UK?

Let me narrow it down for you - he was a South American of some stripe.

Still not there?

The gent in question owned a cat. It was part of his defence against expulsion. It proved he had a "family life".

Remember now?

Theresa May got into hot water for using him as an example of how pathetic our immigration policy is at the recent Tory Autumn conference (she nicked the facts from UKIP's Nigel Farrage who used the case in a speech to a UKIP conference).

You must recall the illegal immigrant now surely!

What the controlled media and party politicians didn't tell us at the time was that the illegal immigrant who proved his "family life" by the fact he had a cat was a fudge packer! His idea of "family life" is sodomy and buying a cat. Let's hope those two streams don't meet!

And the pc media covered this up, the pc judicial system gave him leave to stay.

How on earth can a sodomite with a cat possibly constitute a "family?" And how on earth can an illegal immigrant stay in the UK because he has a sodomitic boyfriend and a cat???

That's how mad the world is! What a farce.

Vote for Nobody

2011-12-18T22:10:00.001Z

Slightly nihilist - but worryingly near the truth as far as the party political system is concerned.

David Cameron's Christianity is a Facade

2011-12-17T15:28:00.000Z

So David Cameron is against moral relativism and for Christian values is he?

There speaks the moneychanger in the temple! There speaks the man who is pushing through "gay marriage" (sic). There speaks the man who has backed unjust Zionist wars.

Perhaps his conscience is bothering him, but he better start putting words into action, otherwise his lack of praxis (i.e. putting this theory into action) will smack of more twisted hyperbole acted out for the cameras and media editorials.

"Theology without action is the theology of demons."
Saint Maximus the Confessor

Mission Accomplished!

2011-12-09T19:56:00.001Z

"We've done Iraqistan, Afghanland... onto Irania!

"For democracy, Lehmans and illegal settlements!"

George Dubya.

BBC: Revisionists!

2011-12-06T11:33:00.001Z

As it is illegal in so many countries to question the holyhoax (unlike the numbers who were massacred/wiped out by the Talmudic Communists), then the BBC must be hoping they don't get jailed for this bit of barefaced chutzpah:

Oh yes FC reader! Didntcha know that sub-Saharan negroes were champion knights in Romano-Celtic Britain.

Haven't you heard of the brave negro warriors who defended Britain from the influx of Saxon heathens?

This is Saturday night fodder for a brain dead generation who think Hitler was the goalkeeper in the 1966 world cup, or that Nelson was the name of the last space shuttle to orbit the earth. Let's not even try anything over 500 years old. (The Council of Trent was the Midlands local authority that started Winterval?)

Come on BBC! A negro as a Arthurian knight? Puuuuurlease!

Loyal to Whom? MP Attacked for Asking Fox/Werritty Questions

2011-12-02T22:09:00.001Z

Paul Flynn MP is in trouble.

He has been central in asking why Fox, Werritty, Ambassador Gould and others met Israeli secret services in secret meetings, not covered by (top civil servant) Sir Gus O'Donnell's investigation into the Fox/Werritty affair, which picked just a couple of other less embarrassing meetings to look into.

The worry is that the Neo Cons, Fox and Werritty, with the Zionist Gould, were pushing behind the scenes for war with Iran and/or giving assurances to Israelis they had no right to give, re. attacks on Iran.

Just recently we've heard of explosions in Iran, which it is being hinted that "external forces" are behind. Given that the UK has invaded and changed government in Iran quite a few times (e.g. in 1940 - a war crime if Germany had done it), and that we are making noises against Iranian nuclear power aspirations, it is little wonder that Iranians attacked the British embassy.

Imagine if Iran had changed our government a few times, had illegally invaded us, had invaded our neighbours (either side) in the last decade and was now backing a terror state [Israel] (which holds illegal nukes) when it makes noises about bombing our sovereign soil?

Wouldn't we be more than a little peeved?

Yet because we are a "democracy" (in which we get to pick from Masondee and Masondum, choreographed by an oligarch media, in which 30% of the 30% who vote - work that out! - choose the government, and even then it breaks down to a few key marginals) we think we have the right to interfere with, attack and invade whoever doesn't do as we say (and no, democracy doesn't come into it as even by our warped standards, Saudi Arabia is a worse offender than Iran, and Iran treats all its subjects fairly, whereas Israel treats an ethnic group as virtual criminals).

So when an Ambassador is caught with his political trousers down in the Werrity/Fox Neo Con scandal (which involved a lot of Israeli money finding its way into their Atlantic Bridge grouping), why shouldn't an MP be free to ask questions without the old canard of "anti-Semitism" being thrown.

It is a scare tactic designed to silence all criticism, especially used against those who are not "anti-Jewish" but simply want answers when it comes to Zionist and Neo Con shenanigans which are trying to tip us into yet another needless and unwanted war, for Israeli interests.

Link:
Paul Flynn Accused of Anti-Semitism

Bishop Williamson, Consumersim and the Gulags

2011-12-01T22:26:00.001Z

This blog has an interesting video of an interview with a friend of Bishop Williamson.

He deals with that interview (the holocaust one), but also consumerism, Communism (inc the gulags) plus abortion, homosexuality and many modern evils.

He is clearly a well-educated author and his argument and views are very interesting.

Dr White Interview - 20 minute clip

Police Arrest Woman for Croydon Bus "Racist" Rant

2011-11-28T21:53:00.001Z

On the BBC London News tonight, there was a story of an English woman on a bus in Croydon ranting against immigrants/non-whites.

Of course we are not shown the provocation, but were told by the police that this was unacceptable, that the woman would be found and arrested. Indeed at the end of the report they gloated that a 34-year-old lady had indeed been arrested.

Now few people will find her language acceptable in front of children, nor are her arguments particularly succinct and thought-through, but I repeat: what was the provocation?

Being a regular user of public transport in the Capital I can state as a fact that most foul language and aggressive behaviour against fellow passengers does not come from, let's say 'English' people (wouldn't want to break any laws!). "Gangsta" of every type (even in school uniforms!) regularly sprawl across the gangways, throw things at passengers, use foul language with impunity and so on.

Such is the boring monotony of travel in the capital, which working people usually put up with, for fear of the occasional but well publicised stabbings that take place.

How lucky we are that the police have the resources to track down, arrest and hold a lady for such crimes against humanity as ranting against immigrants. Luckily for Londoners (especially the real ones, the English ones) there are no muggings, knife crimes, gun crimes etc. to worry about and they can finally walk the streets in absolute safety now that a young mum at the end of her tether is under lock and key!

Lucky for her they have done away with capital punishment.

"Racist Woman"

Video of her rant (please beware it does contain a lot of bad language):

Everything That's Wrong in One Picture

2011-11-25T21:54:00.001Z

One day they'll discover the clinical name for white liberal guilt.

To loathe ones own race and even to loathe the family, "sexuality" call it what you will.

This kind of self-hate must be all consuming.

Very, very sad.

Now all the mixed pooftah offspring needs is a Jewish 'boyfriend' and everything will be a total mess.

Mossad/CIA Death Squads Stirring up Syrian rebels

2011-11-25T00:03:00.001Z

Mossad and CIA active in Syria:

Tip of my deerstalker to Maurice Pinay Blog

Who Remembers the Other Millions Who Died?

2011-11-19T22:08:00.001Z

Who Remembers the Millions KIlled by Talmudic Reds?

Remembrance Day has been and gone. Do the Socialists remember those dead who died in the Korean War fighting Communism? Do we think that WW1 was fought "for freedom"? Or that Iraq and Afghanistan were worth the losses, all for a Neo-Con fantasy?

Next up is Holocaust Day in January. We were sold this political event on the grounds it would remember all genocides. Really?

Who remembers the Ukrainian Christians and Nationalists forcibly starved by the Communists circa 1933?
Who remembers the Irish forcibly starved by the British State circa 1845?
Who remembers the Bengalis forcibly starved by the British State circa 1943?
Then there's the Armenians (the first Christian nation), robbed of their statehood and massacred by Turks.
Then there's the Palestinians, robbed of statehood, exiled, put in camps etc.

All told these peoples vastly outnumber the "6 Million Jews" - the same figure Zionists said were being massacred, we should always remember, at the time in news reports during WW1.

Let's not forget the hundreds of thousands of Germans who died in criminal Allied Firestorms, nor the PoWs deliberately starved in 1945-46.

But hey, don't worry you Ukrainians, Irish, Bengalis, Armenians, Germans and Palestinians - we can all have yet another pantomime based on the Holohoax as the collection tin for B'nai B'rith is passed around. It seems your innocent dead don't count because they are gentile... How many Hollywood films about your dead are there? How many history lessons in schools? How many museum exhibits? How many govt organised memorial days? And how many laws making discussing the facts of their deaths an actual crime?

Ukrainians, Irish, Bengalis, Armenians, Germans and Palestinians: second class one and all!

P.S. If you are in any doubt as to the disdain you are held, think of the Poles who died at Auschwitz. Not only did they lose their freedom in 1945 to one of the countries that invaded them in September 1939 (which brings into doubt the whole ethos of WW2), but when Carmelite nuns erected Crosses at the site of their death, militant Zionist Jews poured vessels of urine over them. The latter demanded that the Crosses be taken down. Not even the dead of Auschwitz count... if they are not "chosen."

Links:
Bengal 1943/44 - The Forgotten Holocaust Killed Millions
Ukraine 1933 - Atheist Reds Organise Mass Starvation
Ireland 1845 - Free Trade Dogma of UK Means Millions Die

Sepp Blatter, Racism in Football and Degenerate Druggies

2011-11-17T20:30:00.001Z

Never mind 'Kick Racism Out of Football' what about a campaign to kick druggies, rapists and degenerates out of football.

A bunch of overpaid prima donnas swan about the pitches on wages each week that most spectators (those who can afford the inflated ticket prices) can only dream of as an annual wage.

Are they saying WHITE is beautiful?

Meanwhile, these 'heroes' of so many schoolkids go about on the pitch 'effing and blinding' using choice words of a lady's anatomy, pouring abuse on refs with little or no control by any authority.

Compare that the rugby world where no dissent is tolerated and the men who put the feeble, whinging, whining Premier League top-earners to shame, do what they are told, obey the rules and even a slight talk-back to the ref results in a penalty or a sin-binning.

All the money wasted on pc anti-racist mumbo-jumbo, hasn't stopped all the drug-taking, girl-raping, foul-mouthed, prissy behaviour of a bunch of over-paid jerks.

And they want us to think that this bunch of wife-cheating, coke-snorting, Tourette's soundalikes can teach us about being all "moral" just because some are black and some are white? Sheesh.

Following the example of his heroes

Meanwhile the head of FIFA is a corrupt dictator, like a Third World despot shoving bulging brown envelopes in his pockets so fast the $100 notes are floating about his shoes, and we are supposed to demand his resignation because he thinks some degenerates cussing who may also thrown in the word "black" should apologise and that be an end to it?

The modern world is topsy turvey. Corruption, greed, cronysim, drugs, abuse, dissension... all and more and we are all supposed to treat these people like national heroes?

Yet throw in an allegation of "racism" and.... whoa! The whole world falls apart.

Talk about beam me up Scotty.

EDL = Zionism, Jewish Lobby and Israeli Firsters

2011-11-12T14:19:00.001Z

A picture paints a thousand words.

No argument. No debate.

The EDL are Zionist.

Nationalists. Patriots. Pay attention.

The BNP sold out on Zionism and it went downhill all the way - because betrayal begets betrayal.

Have no truck with the groups who softsoap, excuse or turn a blind eye to Israel and its crimes.

Who Runs Our Government? Lessons from Greece and Italy

2011-11-11T16:01:00.001Z

Who Does Our Government Serve?

"[Goldman Sachs is] a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jabbing its blood funnel into anything that smells like money"

- Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone magazine

What have recent events concerning the collapse of the Euro and Bankers' greed taught us?

GREECE:

That the Greek people weren't allowed to have their say.
That a former European Central Banker is the new boss of Greece.
Greece will now be forced to strip workers, pensioners etc, via "austerity measures" to pay back bankers.

ITALY:

The Italian people haven't yet been allowed to have their say.
A former Euro-Commissioner (unelected) is being lined up to take over.
The Italian parliament has rubber stamped "austerity measures" as per Greece.

UK:

Tax-payers will give billions to the IMF which will bail out the Euro (i.e, pay back bankers).
We will get no (promised!) referendum on the EU.
"Austerity measures" continue as bankers line-up to make billions out of Euro transactions.
The Church of England appoints a free-marketeer banker to its body to look at banking.

Our governments are run by and for bankers! Not for the people who pay their bills.

Addressing city bankers before he became PM David Cameron said:

“My father was a stockbroker, my grandfather was a stockbroker, my great-grandfather was a stockbroker”.

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Meanwhile Goldman Sachs, the bank at the centre of the US credit crunch was also the bank that fiddled Greece's books, enabling it to join the Euro in the first place, and it carries on doing what it does best - practicing usury to fill its own coffers, profiting as those dumb goy tax-payers suffer, yet again.

===

Read this amazing article by Alex Brummer. Replace "Anglo-Saxon Capitalism" with what it is - "Anglo-Jewish usury/Capitalism" and this article goes some way to nailing what is wrong:

Goldman Sachs Caused Crunch Then Profits from It

"[Goldman Sachs employees fill] the top jobs in the Treasuries, central banks and stock exchanges around the world where, like members of a secret society, they are able to ensure the wealth of the next generation of Goldmanites"

Tesco Drops Cancer Charity To Fund Homosexual Rally

2011-11-10T00:09:00.000Z

From Integrity and Action Blog:

Tesco drops sponsorship of cancer research to fund London Gay Pride

By Deacon Nick, on November 9th,2011

The Tesco supermarket chain has ended its ten year partnership with Cancer Research to join Smirnoff Vodka as the headline sponsors of London gay pride.

Before looking at the details of Tesco’s sponsorship of London Gay Pride lets look at some basic facts –Tesco has stopped funding research into the treatment and cure of cancers that effects 1 in 3 people in the UK to sponsor a two day gay jamboree that directly effects 1.5% of the UK population.

Marketing Week reports:

‘Tesco has signed a deal to become a major sponsor of London Pride,the UK’s largest gay festival,as it outlines plans to host its biggest ever event in the capital.

Tesco will also host a family area designed to provide families attending the event with a ‘safe,relaxed and chilled out’ place with family-friendly entertainment and activities aimed at younger children.

The supermarket will also contribute to funding the free-to-attend event,which is organised by volunteers.

Tesco joins Smirnoff as headline sponsor for the annual event and builds on Tesco’s presence at the 2011 festival.

The news comes shortly after Tesco ended its 10-year partnership with Cancer Research’s Race for Life fundraising event.

Pride London is already the largest Gay Pride event in the UK and it is extending its carnival route and adding a second day to the festival for 2012,when it will host the global festival WorldPride 2012.

Andrew Higginson,CEO of retailing services at Tesco,says,“Tesco is the UK’s largest private employer,and a very diverse international organisation where everybody is welcome. Our Out at Tesco team will be working closely with Pride London to ensure next year’s event is even more fun.”

Francis Philips of The Catholic Herald writes:

‘Why on earth is Tesco promoting an event like this? Tesco is a supermarket;its remit has been to sell good-quality food and other items at very reasonable prices,and in this it has been hugely successful.

Why has it now aligned itself with an aggressive political organisation such as Pride London? Why has it given up its sponsorship of Cancer Research? Or at least,if it has given up this sponsorship,why hasn’t it taken up with another mainstream charity such as the British Legion or Age UK? There are thousands of ex-servicemen and wounded soldiers needing help in this country,and millions of elderly people in danger of neglect. They are a fundamental part of the fabric of our society – the kind of fabric that Tesco should be reflecting.Why,why,why?’

David Skinner of Anglican Mainstream wrote to Andrew Higginson and Philip Clarke,the CEO,in protest.

“I understand… that Tesco is sponsoring London Pride and setting aside ‘family areas as safe places where children can go’. For Tesco to sponsor a tiny homosexual minority (according to the Office for National Statistics) that amounts to little more than one per cent of the population…[it] will be showing the utmost contempt for a large proportion of British society that still adheres,more or less,to the morality and values of the Ten Commandments.”

Apparently he received a stock response to this,merely saying that Tesco’s is “inclusive” and that “everyone is welcome”.

He now urges as many people as possible to write direct to:

Sir Richard Broadbent,Chairman,Tesco PLC,
New Tesco House,
Delamere Road,
Cheshunt,Herts EN8 9SL

Journalists in Sarkozy's Israeli Comments Conspiracy

2011-11-08T22:39:00.000Z

NB: Journalists agreed not to report this. That is a CONSPIRACY.

Sarkozy to Obama: Netanyahu a Liar

2011-11-08T22:35:00.001Z

Watch this great video.

The voice watching the TV and making comments is that "voice of moderation" we all so rarely really hear: a full-blooded Zionist.

And boy oh boy is he angry.

Obama is toast as far as this Israeli-Firster is concerned. And if the chosenites and their followers think this in America, you can be sure they do in Israel too.

It's funny really because if the President of France weren't Jewish, and if the Israeli journalist who broke this weren't Jewish they would be a cacophony of "Anti-Semitism" -- and this despite the fact that the French media (according to BBC reports) agree to cover-up the remarks - obviously thinking to their masters' bidding.

The whole world knows that Israel is a terrorist state and the whole Israeli machinery is based on lies. But for us (mere goys that we are) to hear that world leaders know this too has broken all the taboos of the modern media.

You will note on this video that the Israeli-Firster gets all personal about Obama ("Muslim") and yet Sarkozy, the Jewish President of France who made the comment, escapes his approbation.

Oooooooh. Jewish racism?

Fr. E. Cahill on Freemasonry

2011-11-08T16:57:00.001Z

The Popes charge the Freemasons with occult criminal activities, with "shameful deeds", with worshipping satan himself (a charge which is hinted at in some Papal documents), with infamy, blasphemy, sacrilege and the most abominable heresies against the State, with anarchical and revolutionary principles and with favouring and promoting what is now called Bolshevism; with corrupting and perverting the minds of youth; with shameful hypocrisy and lying, by means of which Freemasons strive to hide their wickedness under a cloak of probity and respectability, while in reality they are the very "synagogue of satan", whose direct aim and object is the complete destruction of Christianity.

Freemasonry and the Anti-Christian Movement,
Fr Cahill, S.J, 1930.

From Levy to Rosenfeld: Labour Do Not Represent British Workers

2011-11-06T18:15:00.000Z

Spot the Spiv

Who exactly is the "Swiss based" Mr Rosenfeld?
What is his background?
Where do his loyalties lie?
Why does he give mega-bucks to Labour? Cui bono?
Like the Werrity/Fox backers - is their a Mossad/Israeli angle?
Is Labour wise to appoint him as head fundraiser after the media implied his involvement in Lord Levy's 'Cash For Honours' scandal?
Why did Labour accept his cash after the Tories rejected it?
Does British politics need another shady "ex" tax-exile running things?
Does Mr Miliband's ethnic background cloud his judgement?

With Mr Miliband taking the role of "chief opponent" to the Tories, the cuts, and seeking to air discontent over the banking swindle etc., this clearly shows (as if we didn't know better already!) that Miliband's Labour will be no different and subject to the same vested interests as the pro-banking, pro-Israeli Tory Party.

From Levy, to Werrity to Rosenfeld: why are the political parties in the pockets of the same Zionist vested interests? What exactly is Mr Rosenfeld buying? And for whom?

Link:
Mirror's politics-man "sceptical"
Daily Mail Investigation
Rosenfeld in Lord Levy's Cash-For-Honours Row
Rosenfeld Appointed Chief Fundraiser

Puncture the Lies of Big Business

2011-11-05T23:07:00.001Z

There's an interesting film available on satellite TV called 'Puncture'.

It's well worth a watch. It shows how big businesses put obscene profits before the health of nurses and the poor overseas. It also shows how they buy silence, bankroll politicians, threaten opponents and even bump off those who refuse to back down.

It's not a "pretty" film and the hero is a (Jewish?) junkie working with a Jewish lawyer (hey - what do you want, a full Rothschild exposé starring Hugh Jackson?).

It is a very interesting film and in the shadow of Mr. Werrity's dubious lobbying exploits on behalf of shadowy Mossad agents and American Neo-Cons, it shows why the system needs cleaning up. If the medical industry can buy loyalty and silence - how much more can the bankers buy?

Liberals Want Blasphemy - French Students Say Non

2011-11-05T17:48:00.001Z

Bravo to the Thought and Action blog for publicising the French Catholics who are fighting against the Marxist/Talmudic filth attacking Christ.

It's interesting that the Muslims are supporting the Catholic students - even though they know that the students want France to be 100% Christian. It is the usual Judeo-Masonic forces that approve of attacks on our traditions (remember Jerry Springer the Musical?) especially because they hold Christ in utter contempt.

Isn't it amazing that we are supposed to allow all manner of filth in the name of 'free speech' and yet as soon as someone suggest that, for example, homosexuality is an evil, or that multi-racism is wrong -- they face arrest, the sack, and the hatred of those who claim to be liberals.

GK Chesterton said that in a topsy turvey society the traditionalist is revolutionary, and so it is today. Those who sculpt "art" out of faeces get polite applause from media luvees, those who say England should be Christian and, er, English - face blind hatred.

C'est la guerre.

Degenerate Moderns: The London 2012 Olympic Posters - the Best of British Art?

2011-11-05T09:51:00.000Z

Degenerate Modern: Ruth Davidson - Tory & Homosexual.

In his seminal work Degenerate Moderns, American author E Michael Jones says that modern artists are a product of their dysfunctional personal lives, and especially their degenerate sexual activities. To break that down and over-simplify it we could say that pooftahs and the like make "art" that is filth. Their lives are mired in filth so their output is mired in filth. Simples.

Think of the BBC. The dumbing down. The soaps pushing faggotry. The news output that pushes 60s liberalism. Why are we surprised when so many pooftahs are involved in the BBC? Just yesterday a former-BBC bod, Ruth Davidson, was announced as the leader of the Scottish Tories, and the BBC news crowed that she was the "first openly gay party leader in the UK" as if this was a pivotal moment, a landmark for freedom, and something to be embraced.

In medialand it probably is, but in the real world where we struggle to pay bills, work every hour God sends and try to bring our kids up to know right from wrong, against a deluge of liberalism.

Martin Creed -- "Work No. 1023"

Was it coincidence then that the day the 'Gay Tory' took control of the Scottish Tories, that the posters for the London 2012 Olympics were unveiled? Ruth McKenzie, the leader of the Cultural Olympiad (sounds like a Soviet Commissar) defended the posters on yesterdays media - clearly used to the gushing praise from luvvies and shocked that so many "normal" people were saying "what the....?"

Ms McKenzie (she has to be a Ms!) is pictured above. Look at the people sponsoring this mess. BP, BT - all the usual big businesses pouring in their vast profits from people like us who can ill-afford their inflated bills. And their money goes to "art" that is just shite. Sorry, but I tried to be all high-brow, but it just pure unadulterated, absolute shite with few, if any, redeeming features.

Funnily enough, many of the great Degenerate Modern cultural events (one thinks of the crime-ridden Notting Hill Carnival or the various Gay Pride rallies where pooftahs illegally walk around with their backsides hanging out) could not take place without big business sponsors (and tax-payer money put in by councils) underpinning the loss-making events that 'celebrate' all that is wrong with Modern Britain.

Gary Hume -- "Capital"

The people 'celebrating' these new Olympic posters, the modern art promoters and collectors, do not live in the real world. They want to kid us that these child-like scribblings offer something "exciting" or "vibrant" or "enriching," the same buzz-words they use to inform us plebs that multi-racism is so beneficial to us! This from the people who only mix with rich 'coconut' ethnics (black on the outside, white on the inside), whose sole idea of "mixing it" with ethnics is which au pair they employ (isn't that a modern form of slavery?), which restaurants they go to, and pay Abdul at the 24-hour petrol station. You think that last one is far-fetched? Billy Bragg actually used that ('I get on great with the Asian at the local petrol station' or somesuch) to justify multi-racism when he lives in hideously White Dorset, not his native London (now very "native").

These people live in their one bubble of luvees, Guardianistas, Islington-types and suchlike whose idea of slumming-it is to fore go their Starbuck's Choca-Mocha Double Grande Vanilla Latte. They live in their gated communities or their white flight enclaves, and tell us that all the degenerate modern world has to offer from inner city London drugs gangs to the output of Tracey Emin is "enriching".

Sorry chaps but it isn't.

It is all soulless and degenerate. Since the 60s the world of art, politics, religion, culture, education, communities etc. etc. have all been ripped apart. The very soul of these building blocks of our society have had their innards ripped out by the Frankfurt School 'Degenerate Moderns' - the Commissars of the New Age.

I'm not saying everything was "perfect" before the 60s, because it so clearly was not, but the answer to that world was not the uber-liberalism of the 60s, which has delivered us a society wherein every gangsta knows their "rights" but so very few know their duties.

Ruth McKenzie of the "Cultural Olympiad" - Degenerate Modern?

The London riots were interesting insofar as it was possible, if only for a short time, that the world of the ganstas might infringe on the Degenerate Moderns... but whereas the police were content to stand back and watch the multi-culti gangstas rip apart the homes and businesses of 'ordinary' people in London, I wonder how fast they would have moved in (even with the army!) if the same rioters had marched on Westminster (or even worse - for them) Islington, Chiswick or Kensington and impinged on the 'bubble' of the likes of our political and cultural "leaders."

One thing is clear, yesterday's news output with its 'Gay Scottish Tory' and its Olympics Modern Art shows just how bad things have gotten in Modern Britain. Will it get even darker before the dawn?

Time for White Nationalists to Fight Back - Against the Masonic Powers

2011-11-04T12:50:00.000Z

Many "white nationalists" will sneer at blacks and Muslims. But I tell you what, if so many white Christian patriots were as honest and forthright as some of the patriots from those cultures - we would have won already! Not to mention the way other races help each other out, or the number of children they have! We think we are so "superior" yet we can't even hang on to what we have got, defend our traditions, keep our homelands for ourselves...

Do we accept a Oriental looking down on us? No. Yet they are probably "more academic."

Do we accept a Jew looking down on us? Hell, no. Yet they are certainly more educated in laws and suchlike.

Do we accept a Pakistani looking down on us? Dear God, no. Yet they put family first, have large families, push their children to get educational achievements and help out each others' businesses.

I believe in racial separation. Not because I think my people are any worse or better than any other (I have enough common sense to know we may be better than some, and may be worse than some, in various aspects, but that's academic). No, I simply love my people, my nation, my race. It is perfectly natural. I fully accept that other peoples in other races will feel likewise. It is as natural as the air we breathe.

I do not hate others. I loathe those criminals, from any races, whether they be the predominantly black muggers or the predominantly white paedophiles, the shyster lawyers and banksters or the ASBO louts wrecking estates; we need to put aside all political correctness and come down hard on such degenerates, for the betterment of all peoples.

It is my sincere belief that mass migration of peoples has had a hugely detrimental effect on society. This can be solved by resettling peoples into their own homelands (if necessary with financial support and so on). Is it a mere coincidence that mass immigration has coincided with the loss of faith in the UK? Certainly the 'creation' of a multi-cult mess has been used by the red atheist commissars (who push for more immigration) to force through a sickening secularism that suffocates us all and destroys much of our heritage and traditions. It seems that the politicians who defend this "enriching diversity" choose to live in white enclaves, where the only immigrants they see is their au pair and perhaps the waiters at the restaurants they frequent.

Anyway, let us return to the nationalists and patriots from other races, those who fight for their own people and not to subjugate their neighbours. I believe it was GK Chesterton who once said that a patriot fights for his people, whereas an imperialist fights to put others down. The arch imperialists of today are obviously the Zionists (in Israel, America and Britain) out to impose their distorted worldview on everyone, by guise or war, bribery or threat.

There are some Islamicists who try to ape Zionist means (in a not so subtle way) but most of those are Mossad/CIA led puppets anyway, creating the bogeyman that the Zionists need to keep the sheep backing their never ending "war on terror" (sic).

Yet what happens to the nationalists who stand up against the "New World Order" (new name for an old enemy)? Invariably the NWO declares war on them. This may be financial, it may be character assassination, but when they get the chance (or if the nationalist poses a threat to their power) they move in for the kill.

One thinks of Nasser in Egypt, Saddam in Iraq, the WW2 "fascist" powers, even Blanco in Fascist Spain in the 70s. To a lesser extent one might even (at a stretch!) put JFK in there, if only because he threatened the military-industrial might of America.

Nationalists in Britain need to wake up. Back in the 80s when the NF said Gaddafy was a 'good man' all too many were waiting to boo and jeer (doubtless egged on by same paid-up assets). "He's a wog/lefty/Marxist" were some of the base comments.

As today we get the old 'terrorist' canard flung, when Pan Am, the German disco and WPC Fletcher are hardly cut and dried cases. Even his giving explosives to the IRA, though a mistake, is kind of understandable when you see that Libya was being attacked by the British left, right and centre. We even funded "Islamicists" to try and kill him - which resulted in innocent bystanders dying. Are we surprised then that Libya chose to "hit back" using those that told him they would "bomb Britain?" They were wrong (two wrongs never make a right) but it is almost understandable.

Imagine if Gaddafy had funded 'Muslim extremists' to kill a British PM, which killed innocents. The UK/NATO etc. would have levelled Libya! Or imagine Libyan jets had bombed the US President's home (on a flimsy pretext) and killed one of his family?

Who are the terrorists?

Ask yourself how many Iraqis died after America illegally invaded that country, partly as revenge for Saddam daring to fire Scud rockets at Israel years before. yet America is all about democracy and freedom right? And Iran is all about hate and evil? Who has Iran killed? How many? Sure they hang terrorists, homosexuals etc. as part of their justice system - but have they invaded other countries like America? Have they napalmed villages as in the 60s? Dropped Uranium weapons on European soil as in the 90s? Brought a firestorm holocaust to at least two European cities as in the 40s? Or illegally invaded a country resulting in many tens of thousands of innocent civilians dying, as in this decade?

Freedom? Democracy? Cheap buzzwords bandied by media puppets and gullible idiots to disguise a Masonic regime drunk on power and out to destroy anyone who may stand up to that power, now known to be overwhelmingly Zionist.

Watch this first video on Gaddafy. It is a bit schmaltzy in parts (dig those groovy beats baby), some of the language is a bit too Muslim for my tastes, and even Nelson Mandela gets a look-in. But look beyond all that. Look at what the man did. He freed his country from foreign army bases. He gave his people freedom from usury-debt. He gave his people free education and healthcare. He gave his people cheap/accessible housing, work, land, education and healthcare.

As for his Islam, it was a product of his birth. If there is a fault it is with those who apostatised hundreds of years ago or were forced to convert by the sword. One cannot blame most Arabs for being born Muslim anymore than one can blame most Indians for being born Hindus. What excuse to our compatriots have who worship at shopping malls on a Sunday, whose idea of a pilgrimage is to Ibiza or whose idea of a Saint is Stephen Lawrence? We point the finger so readily at others, yet it all seems so "splinter versus log" sometimes.

Meanwhile, in "civilised" America so many people have lost their homes, jobs, land. So many people have little or no healthcare. Many people have a shoddy or worthless education. Let's not even mention the crime, drugs, gangs etc.

Land of the Free eh? Free to lose their jobs and homes whilst their government taxes them to pay the usurers' interest! Freedom seems all about who can afford it, and the biggest cheques will always be written by the bankers.

It is a scandal of gargantuan proportions, and only the controlled media kid most people into thinking otherwise, i.e. that they are really free because they can choose between Masondum and Masondee.

We get freedom. Freedom for our kids to drown in a sea of drugs, crime, porn, violence, debt, job insecurity, third-rate education. But it's all apparently OK cos we get to put a cross in a box every 4 or 5 years when the controlled media tell the vast majority to vote for the Mason with the Blue rosette or the Mason with the Red rosette.

Where are the white, Christian, nationalist voices against this con? Oh we had our day - we used to have heroes, men right across Europe from England to Serbia, from Spain to Sweden, from France to Poland - men who defended Christian traditions, men who exposed Communism for the sterile hatred it was, men who exposed Capitalism for the slavery it is.

Where are that breed of well-educated, thoughtful, forthright and brave men today? "Our" people are too busy excusing homosexuals, playing footsie with Zionists, pushing a kosher-liberal agenda to "fight the muzzies" and win the Eastenders-watching generation.

We may not agree with everything they have said, and everything they have done - but people like Gaddafy and Farrakhan ("bloody wogs" tm) at least have the strength to name names and defend their people, to expose the debt swindle, to point at the Zionists as the enemies of civilisation.

What nationalist leader in Europe or the UK would dare to stand before the media's cameras and chide them for hiding the Truth? Who would dare say to them that the people who control banking also control the media! It takes someone like Farrakhan to do it. Oh there have been brave Whites in America too (one thinks of people like Joe Sobran, Michael Hoffman, David Duke and Michael Piper Collins), but where are our political leaders in Europe? More specifically in the UK?

Let's see Farrakhan tearing a strip from the media. The words 'pearls before swine' spring to mind. "You don't know what it's like to be a free white person" - Amen to that! Watch the dumb goy look on.

The enemies of civilisation know their power is crumbling. The terrible crimes of the bankers, the politicians, the media. The scandals of the needless wars. The crumbling of the Euro. The debt slavery of America.

Yet here we are, with a complicit media talking about Greece, about pensions in the UK, about fat cat's bonuses rising,without dissecting the real level of debt or our unending slavery to the banks. They waffle on about this and that, about crusties sitting outside St Paul's Cathedral, about that Cathedral being shut for the first time since 1942, about rising fuel bills and all the rest of it - but the boil is never lanced. They dance around the edge of the problem, never daring to wade in and get amongst the dirt and grime.

Meanwhile we are supposed to be thrilled that our planes were used to level Sirte, to provide cover to the rapers of Tripoli's women and that usury-free Libya will now be "democratic."

God help the Libyans, if they get even half the problems America has today they will be begging for the return of Gaddafy, even with his faults. Yet, America - mired in debt, terror and corruption - was behind the destruction of Libya:

People in this country are sick and tired. Sick and tired of lies and half-truths. Sick and tired of political correctness. Sick and tired of the pigs at the trough. Sick and tired of the working man being taxed to the hilt to pay for the millionaires. Sick and tired of needless foreign adventures. Sick and tired of corruption covered up again and again. Sick and tired of MPs who put the interests of oligarchs and the powerful ahead of us.

The house of cards is shaking.

Communism has failed. Capitalism is failing. Where is the Nationalist Alternative?!!! Whilst this goes on and the whole system stinks, the main (whether we like it or most likely do not!) "nationalist" party, the BNP, is still waffling on about Muslim gangs grooming white girls in English cities.

Now I'm not saying that's not a terrible thing that should be stamped out, but so is heroin addiction across our white communities. So is mugging in our inner cities. So are guns and knives being used against the young. So are the never end stream of paedos that seem to pop up everywhere.

But these are symptoms!!! They are mere symptoms of a sick, corrupt and degenerate post-Christian society that is crying out for sane economics, sane politics and sane morality.

We have a duty to defend the Truth. This was once a Christian land. Christ said "the Truth will set you free" and in this world where a miasma of lies, the smoke and mirrors of the controlled media, where war, fear of war and rumours of war are meant to keep us in our place -- we all have a duty to speak out, name names, and defend the Truth.

We need nationalists. We need patriots.

If we do not present a valid alternative to the system as it crumbles, they will cobble together some half-baked get out clause and things will worsen and worsen. We, and all the peoples of the world, will face a slow agonising death.

The Communists have no answers,. No-one is interested in collectivisation. People want freedom, they believe in the family, they want work. The media with its 'talking head' experts tries to convince us that White is Black and Black is White. The Agony Aunts of 101 themes spout their Neo-Liberal 60s crap to tell us that homos can get married, that families can manage without dads, that "human rights" are vital in schools where lawlessness reigns and when most of the children are frightened of the walk home, that drugs are just fine and dandy -- but smacking a naughty child is a heinous crime deserving of a custodial punishment and putting the child into a 'secure environment' (like the council homes where paedophilia, prostitution, drugs and alcohol addiction are rife).

We must present an answer to all this insanity. The banking crisis. The moral mess. The endemic crime. The corruption in the media, politics and economics.

People are crying out for answers. They can see that everything is a dreadful mess.

Do we, as white, Christian patriots have the courage to stand our ground, face down the enemy, and educate and defend our people in this hour of need? Or will we all wave our little Union Jacks, moan about Muslims, down our beers and moan about "the Pakis having huge families" and read the emails saying "donate now to save Britain" a dozen times sent out by some grubby, shyster-politician out to line his pockets?

One road leads to struggle and freedom, the other leads to obscurity, defeat and the mentality of the bunker.

MP Calls for War Crimes Investigation into Libyan Rebels

2011-11-03T16:18:00.000Z

From Killing Libyans to Cuddling a Dog. Ahh.

A Scottish MP has called for War Crimes Trials over the illegal actions and criminal gangster tactics of the "National Transitional Council" rebel troops in Libya.

Thomas Docherty MP, a member of the House of Commons defence select committee, has - according to a report in The Scotsman - "written to the Foreign Secretary William Hague challenging the UK government to ensure a full, impartial and credible investigation takes place."

He cited the killing of PoWs in Sirte, the city destroyed by NATO planes and rebel troops, after NATO was sent in to (don't laugh) "defend Libyan civilians." He might ask that the torture of military and civilian prisoners and the mass-rapes that occurred in Tripoli by the 'gallant forces of democracy' (sic) also be seriously looked into also.

Speaking of war criminals, the last Tornadoes flew back to Britain from their bases in Italy from where they had been attacking loyalist cities such as Sirte and Tripoli, all in the name of "defending civilians" of course! Quite how one stops civilians being killed in Benghazi by killing civilians in Sirte is anyone's guess! I guess it all depends on whether those civilians were loyal to Libya, or the Rothschild/Islamic cabal, or not.

The French Front National Surrenders to Freemasonry

2011-10-28T17:39:00.000+01:00

Nationalism loses before it's even begun!

Ru Tube video

Why do political parties have to become Masonic in order to get even the crumbs from the top table?

As the young reporter Leon Degrelle - aka Tintin - might have uncovered in the interwar years, democracy is rule by a shadowy oligarchy in which all the main players have to surrender to their worldview.

We live in an oligarchy, a Masonic oligarchy.

Libyan Rebels Commit War Crimes

2011-10-24T22:00:00.001+01:00

The BBC is reporting that the "NTC" rebel forces in Libya (preparing to be the new government) has carried out a war crime against prisoners.

Just the sort of affair Kampfgruppe Peiper was accused of in Normandy, 1944. So will the Libyan rebels chief face similar war crimes trials?

As the rebels committed war crimes against fighters and civilians alike, in places like Tripoli and Sirte (but it's all OK, cos they will have elections!), who was providing the cover that allowed them to raid homes, rape the women, cart off men to torture centres and murder PoWs? Why it was NATO - under the pretext of "protecting civilians" they even bombed civilian areas themselves!

It really does beggar belief doesn't it?

Australian Police Obey the Bankers - Against the People

2011-10-21T23:09:00.001+01:00

And it's not just in New York.

The police in what were once civilised lands are protecting the usury-bankers and NWO elite.

"The people" come at the bottom of a long list.

NYPD: To Protect and Serve - Who???

2011-10-21T22:23:00.000+01:00

Yes. We should ask that question: who do the state forces protect?

Our politicians tells us the first duty of government is to protect the people, yet they deliver us into the clutches of international financiers who bleed us dry, who embroil us in needless wars.

Who are they protecting? Not us.

Who are they serving? Not us.

Might we suggest: the "you know whos?"

Top cops have to be Freemasons. They do what the Freemason politicians tell them. The politicians are placemen of the Masonic bankers.

The few men who own the earth like to think we are "cattle" and they treat us as such, even using their Orwellian buzzwords to corral us, words like "Democracy," "Racism," "Fascist," "Rights" etc.

Even when thousands of people in the UK will die this winter because they cannot afford to 'heat and eat' whilst we funnel multi-billions into the clutches of the faceless bankers that keep us in relative penury.

All the while they will reward their placemen. Virtually every top politician leaves office and gets well-paid jobs (for doing almost nothing) as a reward for their treachery.

And that is why they will always pour money into the coffers of the bankers, whilst squeezing the rest of us until the pips squeak. So look at this video. Who are the police protecting? Who's giving the orders? Who do they protect and serve?

It sure as hell ain't "us."

Gaddafi Executed as New World Order Warning - Talmudic Revenge?

2011-10-21T17:25:00.000+01:00

The execution designed to silence Gaddafi.

This looks like what Michael Hoffman calls the "revelation of the method" - in other words, the Neo Cons, the NWO, the Zionists are warning others, and showing their "power" by the public murder of a patriot.

Mussolini? Streicher? Saddam? All murdered in the most painful and heinous ways - as a means to get ultimate revenge on the enemies of the bankers and their puppets; and give a warning to those who "dare" to stand against them.

With Gaddafi we also have to ask if people like Blair wanted him silenced for fear he would show all the dirty deals and subterfuge "our" leaders undertake when dealing with African and Arab countries.

This is a very interesting and informative news broadcast (would that the BBC with MI6's John Simpson would do such a thing!). How long before Ofcom do to Russia Today what they have done to Iran's Press TV and ban it from our airwaves?

Welcome to the New World Order - where "our boys" can bomb a city to "protect civilians." It all seems so.... well, Israeli!

With thanks to: Thought and Action

Gadaffy Dead? Now the Suffering Starts for Libya

2011-10-20T16:54:00.002+01:00

Mobile phone footage broadcast on the BBC

If the reports are correct and Colonel Muammer Gaddafy is indeed dead, then Libya can now look forward to years of suffering as Islamicists battle with those in new York's pocket. Usury banking and strangulation-force taxes are a joy the Libyans are yet to embrace, but which we in the "international community" enjoy from cradle to the grave.

The NATO bombing of civilian areas gave the lie to the UN resolutions used as an excuse to launch military attacks on the government of Libya. UN resolutions against Israel, with its concentration camps, child prisoners and illegal nukes, sit gathering dust in the meantime.

What tomorrow holds for Libya is as unclear as the CIA spin put on recent events, which including NATO commandos on the streets killing Libyans. As for the people of Tripoli and Sirte... their loyalties will be long remembered by those with Talmudic-style memories when it comes to retaliation and revenge.

No doubt the news media will wax lyrical about Lockerbie and WPC Fletcher, both crimes for which Libya had no blame, whilst covering up British funding of Muslim terrorists who had tried to kill Gaddafy in the past (and killed innocent by-standers) and the American terror air raids on Tripoli.

You see the "bad guys" are always the "terrorists" whereas the 'international community' (CIA, MI6, Mossad) when it bombs, kills, maims etc. usually just brushed it under the carpet.

Will Libya be one country under the heel of the Rothschilds? Or will it split into its component parts? Will it become a 'hardline' Muslim country? Or will it become a Western vessel state with all the endless debt, poverty and hunger that invariably follow?

Two things are for sure:

The truth about recent events in Libya has yet to be told.
The future for Libyans will be "interesting" to say the least.

The West will now screech for "democracy" knowing that they will be on-hand to pour in their money to ensure their place-men have a key role, if not outright control.

Now, regardless of the chaos, terror or retribution in Libya, the Neo Cons will turn their faces to Iran.

The Marranos and the Role of the Enemies of Civilisation

2011-10-18T22:19:00.000+01:00

War propaganda and lies started way before WW2

History often gives us examples we can use to our benefit. Warnings from history, if you like, of how certain forces behave.

Put your crash helmet on. This is a bit of a rant...

The Borgias are often used as the example par excellence of Catholic corruption, treachery, gluttony, murder, lechery, greed, cronyism, nepotism and worse.

What the 'modern world' choose to forget is that the Borgias were Marranos, the "secret Jews" of Iberia* whose very scandals against Christianity (secretly continuing their Talmudic and Khabbalah wickedness) caused the Spaniards to embrace the Inquisition.

The Inquisition - which, remember could only act against professing Catholics - was used to seek out heresy in Catholicism, in particular those who continued their Talmudic ways and/or sought to undermine Catholicism out of some sort of Talmudic hatred.

As a result, historically speaking, the Reformation by-passed Spain as the Spanish church was free of corruption, hypocrisy, heresy and those who would destroy it from within.

The fifth column within Christendom published Protestant polemical works and "six million hysterical-style" works against the Inquisition, not because they were Protestant Christians, but because they hated the Catholic Church for rooting out hidden Talmudism via the Inquisition, and open Talmudism in 1492 when the Jews were expelled from Spain.

Even non-Catholics must wonder why Spain remained a bastion of Catholicism (even providing the "shock troops" of the Counter Reformation that won back Austria, Poland, Hungary, Bavaria, etc. for Catholicism) when so much else of Europe shuddered and split (even countries such as Poland, Hungary and France).

And historians must also wonder if it is sheer coincidence that the terrible example of the Borgias, the Marranos that crept in and took the Papacy via guile, treachery, blackmail and worse, gave the ammunition to those who would attack Catholicism, split Europe and bring about chaos and bloodshed for many years.

There is a lesson here for patriots of every kind.

Those who turn a blind eye to the (actual or spiritual) Marranos of today, those who let them rise to the top without questioning their loyalty or defending the Truth, deserve all they get.

In England in 1717, the Marranos of that era formed the Freemasons, who would worm their way into rich and even royal circles. They would embrace revolution, murder and intrigue across Europe to bring down countries, to help their worldview and to destroy Christianity or make it subservient to their aims.

Liars and subverters

Is nationalism today wise to Freemasonry? To Freemasons and their nefarious ways?

When nationalism starts defending "Western democracy," homosexuality, feminism, Israel etc. etc. we have to wonder whose side we are on. Have 'we' been "flipped" by the Marranos of today? Certainly there are accusations being flung around that would make it seem as though the Borgias are alive and well and living in Britain.

If the corruption, cronyism, betrayal, sexual degeneracy etc. is as bad in nationalism as many think, then these evil days will be flung back in the face of nationalists many years from now, just as the example of the Talmudic Borgias are against Catholics even today some 500 years later.

The BNP have a Uruguayan candidate for the Mayor of London with the name of Carlos Cortiglia. NW Nationalists have unearthed someone posting on the Jewish Chronicle (official Zionist paper and Mossad disinformation outlet) website using that name (here). He heaps praise on the bandit State of Israel which is no ally of the UK, has illegal nukes and continually breaks UN resolutions with impunity.

Now maybe this is a troll who's out to make the BNP candidate look bad, but given that BNP London candidates have previously put out leaflets defending Israel and saying that Jews must support the BNP, that "only the BNP" can defend Jews against 'Islamofascists' and all the rest of the Murdoch-press style editorialising, we are left (as in the case of Peter and the Wolf) of putting the evidence together and coming to one realisation.

In the 1960s Freemasonry brought about changes in the Catholic Church, just as they carried out revolution on the streets, took over more political and media circles etc. via their Frankfurt School. They were out to change society, to put Marxist ideas in place of traditional Christian ones.

Just one of their lines of attack has been to put homosexuals in positions of power, in the media, in the church and in politics. That is why the population has been brainwashed into thinking that "homosexuality is OK" when even just a few decades ago it was an unthinkable abomination.

For the church itself this "homosexualisation" resulted in the paedophile scandal, and with Masonic-liberal placemen at or near the top of the Catholic church, they wanted to find excuses for the queers and move them around, cover-up the abuse and disguise their own ineptitude and mistake in allowing the queers into the seminaries in the first place (the rules pre-60s used to be VERY harsh against any sexual proclivities).

Viva Torquemada and Swazis? Zionists at work

To expose the queer-paedos was to expose the liberalism of the church under the heretical John Paul II, whose New Age happy-clappy ecumenical hog-wash had destroyed Catholicism and emptied the pews. The enemies of the Catholic church knew what was going on, but stayed quiet. They helped the cover-up. (Today they campaign to get more queers into the church).

Then, when Benedict XVI took over, the deluge began. What had been disparate whispering and micro-scandals broke, via the enemy/controlled media, into a global tidal wave. The church was crucified by the forces of Marxian-liberalism, who were the very ones who created the situation that allowed the abuse to take place in the first instance - just as a Pope started to make some noises that the liberals did not like!

You see, the enemies of civilisation, whether it is the church, politics, business or any other sphere of civilisation, will enter within, create a scandal - then scream from the outside that there is a scandal and use it to strengthen their position, usually via weakening or destroying the institution they entered in the first place, and usually once their placemen have moved on.

This is the lesson for nationalism, whether it was the forerunners of the Zionists creating the scandals of the Borgias, of the Pinko-Marxists putting queers into the church and creating the paedophile scandals of the 70s/80s.

Nationalists need to be aware. The Zionists, Freemasons and homosexuals, the spiritual heirs of these examples that history has given us, would love to undermine and wreck nationalism (from within and without). Some would argue they already have.

In the shadow of the Fox-Werrity scandal and the Mossad-front pressure groups who poured money into the shadowy groups behind their "friendship," we have to be aware that these people work in all manner of circles and in creepy ways, using greed, sex and ego to destroy their enemies.

Nationalism is not immune.

---

* Whilst being corrupt and degenerate, the Borgia Marrano Pope Alexander VI, according to his Wikipedia entry ..."distinguished himself by his relatively benign treatment of Jews. After the 1492 expulsion of Jews from Spain, some 9,000 impoverished Iberian Jews arrived at the borders of the Papal States. Alexander welcomed them into Rome, declaring that they were "permitted to lead their life, free from interference from Christians, to continue in their own rites, to gain wealth, and to enjoy many other privileges." He similarly allowed the immigration of Jews expelled from Portugal in 1497 and from Provence in 1498.

So we can see that sexual degeneracy, liberalism and favouritism to those who embrace the Talmud ("their own rites") are the hallmarks of the fifth column against Christian civilisation - from that day to this!

Ofcom Move Against Press TV: Neo-Con Pressure?

2011-10-17T20:36:00.001+01:00

It seems Press TV, the Iranian English language news service, is to be taken off British TVs.

Yet we are told we have "freedom of speech" by the few Masons who run the media in the UK.Unlike Channel 4 and 5 Press TV doesn't put out porn. Unlike the Zionist Richard Desmond, Press TV doesn't publish hardcore porn. Unlike BBC1 and BBC2 Press TV doesn't undermine public decency and morality by promoting homosexuality, blasphemy or using foul language.

Still, if a channel does not publish porn, filth, blasphemy and crudities it can still be pushed out of the UK, on a technicality, if it is opposed to the Neo-Con and Israeli interests.

What is it the system fears? Aren't we allowed to watch an alternative to BBC/ITV/Sky News?

Watch Press TV this week (on Sky channel 515) while you can. If they push out Press TV, Nationalists should also check in from time to time on Russia Today (Sky 512). It's a good way to get an alternative view to the Pinko-leftist and Neo-Con Capitalist views of the "establishment" channels, whether it's their headline news programmes or in-depth features, interviews etc.

Link:
Ofcom's move against Press TV

Mother and Father Deemed Irrelevant or Offensive?

2011-10-15T16:53:00.002+01:00

There is a piece on Griffin Watch, which deals with a media story on the EU putting "Parent 1" and "Parent 2" on passports so's faggots can put their details with a clear conscience (!). I felt a rant coming on (apologies to Ranting Ron) so here's my response:

We Need an EU Law so Sad Gits Can "Marry" Foodstuffs*

This is the ultimate reality for the Masonic and Red enemy. In a world where there is no OBJECTIVE TRUTH, but wherein everything is subjective to our whims, where "democracy" extends to the family and 'sexuality' (i.e. where parents have no rights to control their children, and where men can "decide" they are 'really women'), why is this so surprising?

In an age when nationalists attack Muslims for being opposed to homosexuality (one of their very few redeeming features) itself a remnant of the fact they are a Christian Heresy, why are we surprised that the EU is now dictating that a mother and father begetting children is no longer the accepted norm?

An OBJECTIVE TRUTH: a child has one father and one mother is replaced by relativist nonsense, viz that a child can have two mothers, two fathers, and no doubt one mum and one section of the Berlin Wall - or whatever crazy notion infects the body politic in the near future.

The modern world is, quite literally crazy. At the centre of it are the immoral degenerates called homosexuals. They seem to [if you'll pardon the pun] have a vice-like grip on this and the previous government and seem intent on pushing their (very) queer agenda, at a time when real parents have very real worries, and it isn't about "mother and father" being on a passport!

The EU is Masonic, Socialist - dare I say Satanic?

They have an agenda which is to destroy the family and destroy every last vestige of Christian civilisation.

There can be little doubt in an age when they tax us to the hilt to give billions to bankers, and at a time when families have rights stripped away, and homosexuals get "rights" left, right and centre.

We've been dealt a bum hand!

---

*As long as it is a loving, caring relationship, of course.

Libyan Patriots Fight Back in Tripoli Against the Terrorists

2011-10-15T00:04:00.000+01:00

A "NTC" rocket launcher being used against Sirte civilians

So "Gadaffy Loyalists" (not "brave Libyan Resistance fighters defending civilians from roving gangs of terrorists intent on rape, beatings and looting") are fighting back in Tripoli.

After "the West" told us all it was super-safe, and everyone except Lady Gaga had made whistle stop tours there (usually only to the inside of some nondescript building that could have been in Slough!).

Don't believe the lies of the media:

NATO were not "protecting civilians" or else they would not be bombing civilian areas.
NATO forces HAVE been on the ground killing and maiming.
The Rebels have committed atrocities against civilians, including rapes in Tripoli.
And much worse will probably come out in the weeks, months and years ahead.
Is going house to house in Tripoli and Sirte any different from Benghazi - used an excuse to drag us into the conflict?

We should not be taking sides in a Libyan conflict.
We should not be enforcing Rothschild-backed regime change.
Nationalists should back the anti-usury Green revolution, whatever its minor failings.

Gadaffy's Green Book may not be pitch perfect for us, but it is a Libyan solution to Libyan problems and as much as it is based on the Fascist Corporatist/Medieval Christian Guild structures as espoused by Nationalists from the 19th Century to WW2 and beyond, we should give it our support and learn from its positive lessons and its mistakes.

Interestingly, one of the few outlets for some truth in all this - Press TV - is, so it is being Tweeted, being attacked by 'Ofcom' (the communications watchdog) and could well be taken off Sky satellite/digital TV. their reports clearly have the British State and its Zionist backers worried.

It is up to Nationalists to spread the truth about these world events, even if inbred, deadbeat morons in the BNP say we are "muzzie lovers" (as they did to FC when we were forthright in defending the Palestinian cause). The cheap labels thrown by those so keen to take the shekels of the enemy mean nothing to us Third Positionists.

Quote of the Week: Codreanu on Democracy

2011-10-13T00:43:00.001+01:00

Tip of my Charles I-era foppish wig to Thought & Action for this one.
I normally plonk quotes of the week in the side column, but this one is just too darn big, so here goes lifted straight from the aforementioned blog of good repute... Rumour has it this is going to be the foreword for the next BNP manifesto. Kerching!

Codreanu wrote the following with Romania in mind but it can be applied to your Nation also:

“Democracy breaks the unity of the Romanian people, dividing it into parties, stirring it up, and so, disunited, exposing it to face the united block of the Judaic power in a difficult moment of its history.

This argument alone is so grave for our existence that it would constitute sufficient reason for us to change this democracy for anything that could guarantee our unity: namely our life; for our disunity means death…
Democracy is incapable of continuity in effort. Divided into parties that govern one, two or three years, it is incapable of conceiving and accomplishing a long range plan. One party nullifies the plans and the efforts of another. What was conceived and built by one today is demolished next by another.

In a country in need of construction, whose historical moment is that very construction, this drawback of democracy constitutes a threat. It is as if on a farm the owners would change yearly, each coming with different plans, doing away with what the predecessors did, their work only to be done away with by the next owner coming tomorrow.

Democracy makes it impossible for the statesman to do his duty. A statesman of the greatest good will becomes, in a democracy, the slave of his supporters; he either satisfies their personal appetites or they destroy his backing. The statesman lives under the tyranny and permanent threat of the electoral agent.

He is placed in the position of choosing either the renunciation of his lifetime’s labour or the satisfaction of his supporters. And then the politician satisfies their appetites; not out of his pocket, but out of the country’s pocket. He creates jobs, positions, missions, commissions, sinecures, all of them loading down the national budget which burdens more and more the ever more bowed backs of the people.

Democracy is incapable of authority. It lacks the power of sanction. A party, for fear of losing its supporters, does not apply sanctions against those who live through scandalous business deals running into the millions, through thievery or embezzlement; nor does it apply any sanctions against political adversaries lest they expose its own shady deals and incorrectitudes.

Democracy is in the service of high finance. Because of the expensive system and the competition among various groups, democracy needs a lot of money. As a natural consequence it becomes the slave of the great Jewish international finance which subjugates it through loans and subsidies.”

BNP Panorama Programme: A Nationalist Analysis

2011-10-11T21:10:00.000+01:00

So what to make of last night's Panorama?

I don't think the BNP leadership will lose too much sleep. Yes, there is the danger that they may be arrested for fraud. The tone of the programme though came across as quite petty and vindictive. The 'man on the Clapham omnibus' will be thinking "the BNP has done what all the other parties do and the BBC are chasing the BNP because the latter are 'racist'."

And if the man-on-the-street thinks that, the dwindling number of Griffin loyalists will think so too, with just a few put off by the evidence of sleaze, and so the BNP will continue to be some form of cash-cow.

There's not much more to it than that really and if you want to analyse it, pick through the minutiae then I daresay lots of forums (fora?) will do that. The worst part for the BNP was when NG slinked away from the press conference - it looked decidedly dodgy, as if he really did have something to hide. But otherwise... just looked like typical dodgy politicians doing what politicians do: skimming, infighting, flinging rumours and counter-rumours and fleecing their supporters.

The worst the BNP can expect is that the average voter will dismiss them saying "you're all as bad as each other."

I think if the BBC had wanted to kill-off the BNP they could have done. After all how does £2 Million profit in one year convert into £6-500,000 of debts? Over-spending just does not cover it. As the lady in Jack Ruby's bar in the film JFK said "it's as crooked as a dog's hind leg."

But then some of those being used to attack NG were a part of the original scams and so not exactly in a position to "incriminate" themselves in the fleecing of BNP members for the personal profit of a handful of people.The Gordian Knot that is the BNP's finances over the last few years is unlikely to be unravelled by any of those involved in handling those self-same finances.

And so the mess, the cronyism and the betrayal is likely to roll on. And if Griffin is arrested? More "donate now" mail outs to beat "the State repression" will follow, surely as night follows day.

Libyan Resistance news

2011-10-10T17:09:00.001+01:00

Keep an eye on this You Tube channel for 'the news behind the news' that the Rothschild-BBC will not bring you, including NATO Commandos being used on the ground in Libya, as well as the suffering of Libyan civilians thanks to NATO bombing (a direct contradiction of the UN resolution that they use as an excuse).

Homosexual Lobby Denies Parents - the Madness Continues

2011-10-10T17:00:00.002+01:00

"Mom and dad on their first date"

Mums and dads on passports are to be replaced by "parent 1" and "parent 2" because of the homosexual lobby.

The mad, bad, modern world dictates that we should be free to name our parents as whoever we feel we should, whereas common sense, science, fact and truth dictate that everyone has a biological mother and biological father. Even the "gay lobby" can't agitate that basic truth away!

So where next? Can a screaming liberal nutter put the name of an elderly tortoise as his father? If not why not? Surely that is the logical conclusion of this utter madness?

Link:
PC Passport

You think that's mad? No madder than changing marriage from being a legal, sacred and immemorial contract/oath between a man and a women "till death us do part" into an 'as long as it lasts' hug-fest between God knows what and God knows whom.

Will BNP Panorama be Used by Usury Bankers to Stop Opposition?

2011-10-09T15:43:00.000+01:00

Christ drives the Usurers out of the Temple, woodcut

There seems to be some debate going on, on the interweb (also known as 'tinternet near the Pennines) over the Panorama programme on the BNP.

Now let us discount the Griffinites/Griffinistas, that motley band of ever-decreasing (paid) sycophants who employ several sock puppet personas to defend their lord and master. Their line seems to be "it's something over nothing" (which it clearly ain't) as sturdy and relevant as the Maginot line in 1940. As a second line of defence, they are screeching that those who "work with" Panorama are traitors to Nationalism, working with those of the Frankfurt School, the Marxists and uber-liberals of the BBC.

As I said in a previous post, Nick Griffin himself has a record of running to the same enemy media to attack other patriotic groups, so it is very much a case of "let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Furthermore, whilst some of those appearing may have ulterior motives (such is our fallen nature), of those who have been royally shafted by Monsieur Griffin, and especially those who have been wrongly accused of illegality and about whom severe lies have been told in order to implicate them in serious law-breaking, who are we to question their motives and to doubt their need to clear their name in an 'official' and public channel? After all what else are they supposed to do? Write about it in an anonymous forum read by a handful where Griffin's attack-dog sock puppets will add lies to their account? Or write into the BNP website where their account will be deleted?

Someone else on the webesphere (forgive my failing memory, to many early mornings to watch the rugby, so I don't know if they were a "goodie" or a "baddie") said that we should not "blame" the BBC for raking over the ashes of Nationalism. Now I know that sounds glib, but what the chap (or chapess) was getting at, is that we shouldn't be concerned at a dog returning to its vomit, or a cat marking its territory - i.e. it is yucky, it may even be revolting, smelly etc. but it is what they do. Of course Nationalists can complain and highlight the nature of these people, as with usury-bankers, but in reality we should expect no less. In fact, it should help us to sharpen up our act, for if we were moral, upstanding and decent they could only moan at us for being nationalists! No crime there m'lord.

The impressive but ultimately useless Maginot Line

So ignoring the Maginot Line and having landed our paratroopers of logic on the Fort Eben Emael of the secondary Griffinite defence, let's send our Panzers of Truth through the Ardennes. There remain two more arguments about the programme (the French Army and the British Expeditionary Force, if you will) stopping the progress to Paris (Griffin's HQ).

The French Army argument is that the programme will not be a knockout blow, making a (deliberately) weak and partisan blow (easily dismissed as the actions of anti-nationalists) which will weaken the BNP popularity even further with the voters, but will deliberately not deliver the killer-blow. So Griffin (or Paris to continue the analogy) will stand, though wounded, and limps on (perhaps in a gradual, terminal decline) but like an open wound or a festering sore, causing more pain than hope, a frail shadow of its former strength.

The British Expeditionary Force argument is that the programme will be a killer blow to Griffin, perhaps not instantaneous, but an undeniable deadly blow that cannot be ignored. It will lead to a mass walk-out of those who have not already quit the BNP in disgust. It will mean a total collapse in support and votes. It will mean some criminal convictions at the top of the BNP and thus the destruction, ruination and total devaluation of the BNP as a party, as a brand and as an historical political body. Some like to think, no doubt, that this will happen overnight, but if it does happen it will be played out, court case by court case, election by election, defection by defection, revelation by revelation - because (if the evidence is to be believed) those at the core have a vested interest in keeping the books closed, the truth under wraps and the BNP solvent, as long as they can to protect their liberty, their income and (don't laugh) their reputations.

And so there we have it. France 1940, BNP 2011. Will nationalists learn the lessons of the latter as military historians have of the former?

I am going to repeat myself now, but do bear in mind that many readers don't read this blog as often as some others, they pop in from time to time. Yesterday I had the honour of meeting a group of very dedicated activists doing what they can to fight the good fight, and more than a couple of readers of this humble blog. Though I had never met most of them before, it was like meeting old friends, compadres in the struggle for truth and justice. Speaking to them it was clear that whilst some read the blog avidly, some pop in and out. That is the nature of the internet and the modern world. I am the same with many sites, forums, twitter and blogs that I really like. You try and keep up with them, but work, family and other matters "get in the way" and you end-up playing 'catch-up' or just fling yourself in and the deep end and hope it all makes sense again.

So, for regular readers, catch-up merchants or those in at the deep end, let me re-cap some of my favourite themes on this matter:

The Flag NF, C18 & BNP. Whether we look at the 80s, 90s, or 00s, there are people used to disrupt Nationalism. Reactionary, Violent or Financial. The weaknesses in human nature are used by state assets. Mossad are known to use sex, pride or money to net their assets, using positive or negative means. Whatever one thinks of Mossad (and our own State services) they are not stupid. They know what to do, what buttons to push, what means to use and what misfits to appeal to or trap. As Nationalism is (nominally!) opposed to the money-power, so the money-power will use every means at its disposal to attack, wear down, split or (worst of all) control Nationalism.
Nick Griffin. Third Positionists warned other nationalists over 10 years ago that Griffin would betray, sell-out and stab-in-the-back his Comrades in order to promote the one thing dear to him: Nick Griffin. Yet the BNP rode the crest of a wave. As he turned the BNP into a pro-Israeli, pro-war, anti-Muslim party, he seemed to get an easy ride from the enemy media. Some say that was a quid pro quo arrangement. And as long as Nationalists are happy to accept betrayal of principles (and I don't mean endless nit-picking over the minutiae of ideology, I mean the ejection of central tenets of nationalism), they will, it could be argued, get what they deserve. And so 10 years on at the centre of a perfect storm (banks, politicians and media all undermined) the BNP is a toothless dog, unable to rally the people in the cause of National Freedom and Social Justice. Accident or design? Financial gluttony, the love of money, was certainly the root of this evil, and that evil is the neutering, the side-lining, the ruination and the total discrediting of nationalism which (we should remind ourselves) at this moment, is the only political solution outside of usury-capitalism and state-socialism to the total moral, financial, social and political ruination facing not only the UK, but all of Europe, America and much of the "civilised" world.

So, whilst some may titter at the imbroglio in/of the BNP, especially those outside it or who have quit it in disgust at the financial and moral mess of its higher echelons (Granny-Porngate being just the choicest of examples), it is in reality a salient lesson for us all.

It may seem "boring" or "backwards" or (shock, horror) "purist" but they days when nationalism could afford to be amoral (let alone immoral!) has gone. Politics will never be a "clean" world, but it can be cleaner. We should also be aware that nationalism can attract some strange characters, with their own misconceived concepts of what nationalism is. Therefore we have a duty to ensure that nationalism is as "normal," family-based and sane as possible.

I do not claim to have all the answers and I certainly do not (unlike Monsieur Griffin) claim to be some sort of political or secular messiah, far from it being fully aware of my many shortcomings and frailties. I am happy to play a minor role, take a back seat etc. I am also happy to work with those I agree with 90% of their agenda (as long as certain central tenets are upheld). However, I and many others know that the modern world is failing. I and many others know that Nationalism has many of the (social, political, familial, economic and moral) answers needed to remedy the UK and many other states. I and many others are looking for a Nationalist banner to be raised, to defend Faith, Family, Nation.

Anti-Communist Posters in Vichy France

Extraordinary events require an extraordinary response. Take the fall of France in 1940: the total humiliation of French pride (no small thing!) led to many good souls to embrace the challenge when despondency and despair could have been the slough to slump into. Work, Family, Fatherland became the motto of Vichy France. Many brave young men went on the anti-Bolshevik Crusade. French patriots rose to the challenge and defended the honour of France at home and abroad, exposing Freemasonry and the enemies of mankind.

The economic crisis, the MPs expenses scandal and the Murdoch phone message scandal have delivered huge opportunities. Let's be clear about that. It is a perfect storm for nationalism. It is akin to 1920s Germany. To 1930s America. Nationalism should be rampant! The banks, politicians, EUrophiles, media - all should be retreating before clear nationalist force. But just like the Catholic Church let in liberalism and Masonry 50 years ago (to be "in-tune" with the Modern World), and so turned a blind-eye to poofs and Marxists entering its seminaries and reaped the whirlwind in the paedophile scandal which an enemy media used to discredit it; so the nationalist movement has been undermined and weakened by events which began when the BNP changed its stance on Israel, so it could be in-tune with the "modern world" (Freemasonry) and be an "anti-Muzzie" pressure valve, making lots of money.

Now, just as Christianity must turn its back on Freemasonry, liberalism and homosexuality if it hopes to offer an answer to the mess materialism has made of the civilised world, so nationalism must turn its back on Freemasonry, liberalism and homosexuality if it hopes to offer answers to the political mess of the civilised world.

We are entering a time when people have to choose: eat or heat. The hard times will roll on. More people are put on the dole or in dead-end Mcjobs. The political classes are out of touch. They are either free-market Freemason usury Capitalists in hock to the banksters, or flea-bitten Freemason liberal-Marxists in hock to the banksters. Thus their only answer to the banking crisis is to pour "money" created out of thin air into the banks' vaults (computer systems) for we tax-payers to pay back with actual money, taxed from our hard-earned wages from our labour. We will be working to pay off the endless debts of the banking system!

Those who face the eat or heat challenge will be being taxed to pay the trillion pound debts of the billionaires' usurious banking system!

Where is the Christian Nationalist answer? Where is the Crusade against usury? Where is the sheer force of the urgument of common sense for the common good, Social Justice delivered for the betterment of all! With one fell swoop nationalism could destroy the Wizard of Oz nonsense of global Capitalism, and the dead-end ideology of the gulags that is flea-bitten Marxism.

Let's be frank. Those who offer freedom from debt, freedom from usury, and an answer to rapacious banksters who see the workers as a means to total taxation to fill their coffers, will be saluted by most of the people as saviours from debt slavery, taxation and the heat or eat generation.

Thanks to the shenanigans of the pilfering, morally decrepid BNP leadership, the Masonic system has ensured there is, at present, no credible answer on the horizon. For how can "nationalists" have an answer to the worst economic crisis in history when the "nationalist" party is involved in debts, dodgy finances, profiteering, fleecing small businesses, and allegedly breaking election laws on paying for election bills on time?

Queen Isabella and Christopher Columbus

That is the criminal reality at the centre of the BNP scandal! That they are one more scandal on top of the banks, MPs and media. They have robbed us all of offering our answer in a clear way, for have no doubt: we have the answers, but an enemy media (owned/controlled by Masonic bankers) will use the example of the BNP as a brick bat to beat us all down.

So, at 8.30pm, Monday evening, on BBC1, do watch the Panorama programme on the BNP. But watch it fully aware of all its bitter lessons and all it should impart to patriots of goodwill for the future. Perhaps, as in days of old when we might have had good, Christian kings defending their people from external and internal foes alike (would that we had a Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain today!), we should intone:

Nationalism is dead. Long live nationalism!

Gay Tories are Wrecking Our Lives, Our Society, Our Traditions

2011-10-07T17:29:00.000+01:00

Who's Yo Daddy? Answers on a Postcard

David Cameron says he is in favour of "gay marriage" (sic) because he is a Conservative. I assume he means Conservative with a big C, i.e. a member of the Tory political party, as he is certainly not a conservative in any meaningful sense.

What is he conserving? Certainly not marriage. Marriage is already in terminal decline thanks to divorce on demand, 60s liberalism, extra benefits for single parents (especially in-school mums getting council houses).

As marriage has crumbled, so society has worsened. We can say the rise in immigration and the slow death of Christianity plays its part too, but the headlong plummet of marriage as an institution has played the central role in society's demise.

So what will creating the oxymoronic "gay marriage" actually do? It will undoubtedly weaken marriage itself, because it makes a mockery of marriage. Traditionally (I can hear liberals screaming!) marriage was undertaken for procreation. Marriage was the bedrock on which the family was built. You know - mum and dad, bringing up children to know right from wrong.

In a society where marriage is a "take it or leave it" where everyone has a "partner" (whether married for 50 years or a two week fling to be ditched at the next drink-fuelled night club evening) are we really surprised that there is no respect any more (and I don't mean in that negro-urban gun-totin' way which results in someone being shot by an Uzi for treading on someone's toe)?

We do not respect our ancient traditions. Marriage is an empty husk in many communities. Kids have no dad, or a plethora of "dad" stand-ins. Now we are to see the "partnership" of buggery, the sterility of dykedom, put on a level pegging with the sanctity of marriage with the procreation of children.

No wonder society is falling apart!

Cameron knows that he is sticking the knife in on a Tradition that is as old as the hills. He knows this will not help society in any way.

But he has his masters to obey. The pink pound will flow into Tory coffers. The "nasty party" image will be blurred by media-luvvies who approve in their simpering way. His Lodge membership will be advanced.

We are witnessing the knife being plunged into the heart of this land, of our traditions, and the sanctity of marriage by a Rothschild hireling traitor who was born into obscene wealth and will always have obscene wealth.

The chattering classes will approve. The media will approve.

Yet who wants this? There is no popular clamour for this.

There is popular clamour for an end to needless wars -- yet we bomb Libya.
There is popular clamour for a vote on the EU, yet we will remain members.
There is popular clamour for action against the utility companies who overcharge.
There is popular clamour for action against the banks who have delivered ruination.

Yet the Tories go against popular wishes, citing lack of time, or of the economy being "more important" than these "side issues."

So how come they ignore all these vital matters, yet still find time for yet another law giving the minuscule homosexual lobby everything they ask for?

To ask the question is to instinctively know the answer.

Needless Zionist war. Stupid pro-homosexual laws. Bankers bailed out and protected. EU membership protected.

It's not so much David Cameron, as Blairbot 2.0, and it is us, the poor working plebs of the land who are being shat upon from a great height for the umpteenth year!

Lost your job? Child killed in a needless war? Business closed down? Can't afford to heat and eat?

Never mind! At least we can see some poofs getting "married" in and on the media.

What a @#+#ing joke!

BNP Ex-National Treasurer Dies of Heart Attack (David Kelly, Robin Cook...)

2011-10-04T10:09:00.001+01:00

"Not a good treasurer" - such praise for a dead BNP "comrade"

David Hannam, perhaps best known for trying to take an under-16 y.o. girl to his bed at a BNP conference (despite being married) has, so Nick Griffin twittered, died of a heart attack.

Hannam was born in 1981. No-one is suggesting a man of 30 cannot have a heart attack, but just as the BNP finances come into focus, how "convenient" for the pocket-fillers to now have someone to point the finger at, who cannot respond to the lies, as other ex-National Treasurers have done.

It is hard not to come to one of two conclusions about the death of a very young man in such circumstances:

That the stress put on him via the dodgy finances and investigations contributed to his early death
Or that the State has done a "Dr David Kelly" to try and tie up the loose ends.

Either way the BNP chief (already slapping down Hannam's character by saying he was "frankly not a good treasurer" -- leaving some to ask why he was employed over a registered accountant then) is, being charitable, at best partly responsible for his death.

The ground is prepared for Hannam to be the fall-guy

For Hannam to die at this time simply cannot be seen to be coincidence. Certain non-BNP member(s) close to Nick Griffin are already laying the blame for missing monies and dodgy accounts, on public forums (see image to the right), at the door of Hannam... how very convenient!

Just as another ex-National Treasurer went to BBC Panorama to deny the lies of the BNP surrounding a missing £37,000, so David Hannam dies and is already being put in the frame.

It's all very, very intriguing.

Panorama BNP Special: 10th October. Get the Popcorn Ready

2011-10-03T21:59:00.000+01:00

Tip of my White Power Bobble Hat to Griffin Watch for this news.

The BNP story is a sad one, but we warned nationalists of this over 10 years ago! We said the BNP would be dragged down, and the good name of nationalism with it.

Many years ago Nick Griffin went running to the establishment media. The Express, currently owned by a Jewish pornographer, were doing a story. I think the reporter was State/Searchlight-asset Yvonne Ridley who later "converted" to Islam and is now some sort of lefty-feminist-integrationist-Muslim-rights wallah. All very seedy.

Anyway, with the Express's story on the Third Position (they even hired a helicopter to take photo's!) which was the usual Searchlies concoction of extremists, terrorists, MI5/6, "anti-Semites," UDA/IRA etc. etc. Nick Griffin ran into the arms of the Porno-Talmudo-Searchlies-State set-up to denounce his erstwhile comrades as "mad not bad" whilst denouncing them and getting his tuppence worth of publicity. This was especially irksome as one of the TP comrades at the centre of the Express story, which Griffin delighted in adding to with his own spin, had been ripped off by NG, taking thousands of an inheritance to buy useless printing machinery in another hairbrained 'get rich quick' scheme.

I wonder if the same Nick Griffin will now condemn those talking to Panorama -- who have either having been ripped off by him, put in dodgy situations by him (with the courts etc.), and so are protecting their own backs -- as "state assets" or "Searchlies spies" when he was so quick to run to the media (when his ex-TP comrades had not dumped on him to the media or authorities) with false tales and rent-a-quotes, as he sought to ingratiate himself with the BNP?

Or is working with the Zionist media to attack nationalists OK if it is in Nick Griffin's interests to do so, but not acceptable if it goes against Nick Griffin's interests? To the impartial observer of BNP goings-on, that certainly seems to be the case.

The sad thing is that too many people have stayed quiet, looked the other way and so forth whilst the BNP has been carved up. A suitable heading for the BBC programme might be "Where Have the Millions Gone" after all just a year or two back the BNP were boasting of their having raised quite a few million in one year. Plus there's the Euro MEPs with their salaries, staff salaries and expense accounts.

Those who looked the other way may have done so for good reasons - e.g. so nationalism didn't get bad publicity - but the bad news just kept snowballing and snowballing - and now there's an avalanche of bad news, court cases, debts and more.

Meanwhile those who turn to the BBC may have various motives, some may be honest and some not. Some may be decent and some not. Some may be genuine patriots and some not. But as the rumours, spin and half-truths start flying back and forth let us not forget that it was Nick Griffin who was happy to work with the likes of Aaronovitch, and who attacked fellow nationalists whether the Third Position, National Front or even the "dinosaurs" in the BNP.

We will have to wait and see what the BBC have unearthed, and what the corruption in the BNP has gifted the enemies of nationalism.

Libya: The Spirit of Blair Lives on as Libyan Civilians Dodge NATO Bombs

2011-10-02T19:31:00.000+01:00

So let's get this straight shall we?

Civilians are fleeing Sirte the Gadaffy "stronghold," leaving their property, homes, livelihoods, schools, jobs...

This is the same city that NATO have been bombing as part of their remit to, erm, protect Libyan civilians from Libyan armed forces.

Outside Sirte wait, erm, Libyan armed forced, ready to storm the city. Even as the civilians fled, NATO were still bombing the city.

So exactly which Libyan civilians are NATO protecting by bombing Libyan civilian areas? And who will protect the Libyan civilians who stay in Sirte, to protect their property, from the Libyan armed forces waiting outside the city to wreak havoc/revenge (as they did in Tripoli, even raping women).

Well done NATO! You have excelled yourselves in twisting a UN Resolution beyond all recognition.

The Spirit of Tony Blair QC lives on! Business is still good for war criminals and profiteers.

Link:
Time to Tally up Civilian Deaths

Tory MP Urges Crackdown on Churches that Refuse "Gay Weddings"

2011-09-27T00:31:00.001+01:00

A gay couple, Mike and Dave. Well, they look happy

How quick we have moved, or rather have been pushed, as a society.

It doesn't take long does it for the usual degenerate anti-Christian, anti-family agenda to come to the fore.

Now a Tory MP, Mike Weatherley MP for Hove, wants Churches that refuse to do "gay weddings" (whatever the HELL they are!) to face a crackdown from the State.

Dear God in heaven! Just 15 years ago you would have thought such a thing would be the plot from a book about the advent of the Anti-Christ.

Will "Call me Dave" Cameron brush this aside to look like a "pretty straight kinda guy" [copyright T. Blair] whilst he pushes through yet more pro-homosexual laws? Seems likely. So Cameron looks like he's pro-family and decent, whilst a Brighton area MP picks up more pooftah votes.

Kerching.

As sections of the BBC push "BCE/CE" instead of BC/AD for years as a way to undermine our Christian culture (stupid really as BCE and CE - [Before] Common Era, both take their cut-off point as the birth of Christ) we shouldn't be that surprised.

The BBC hope that be enforcing BCE and CE in more places it will become more widely used, like the accursed "partner" has replaced spouse/husband/wife/fiancee/girlfriend/boyfriend/casual sexual partner/menage a trois/tree with a weird shaped hole in it.

Our culture is being eroded, by the BBC, by mass immigration and by the laws pushed by Rotshchild-rent-boy politicians.

Traitors.

If this MP ever got his way we would be like the Scots in Braveheart being married in the woods, or the Irish in Elizabethan penal times, attending Mass in the wilderness. Given the choice between the "official" State-sanctioned Church (as in the USSR or today's China) or the underground Church that remains loyal to Church teachings, we would have no choice!

Buggered if I'll go to a "gay wedding" church.

Link:
MP Calls for Licence Removal

Goldman Sachs Man Put on the Spot by BBC

2011-09-25T17:20:00.001+01:00

I was listening to a "best of Today" podcast, from Radio 4's famous morning news programme. It was on Greece, the Euro and the economy (from last Friday I think).

Lo and behold up popped an "expert" from Goldman Sachs. Now I do not know all the intricacies of the 'Global Downturn' but my failing memory tells me that Goldman Sachs played quite the pivotal role.

So there I was, shaking my fist at my MP3 player, when the interviewer, John Humphries cut in that Goldman Sachs had helped created the mess with Greece by hiding the extent of Greece's debts. He intimated that in lying (fraud surely?) Goldman Sachs had made a bad situation worse, letting monies being poured into a Greek black hole.

The response of the Goldman Sachs man? "I have not come on here to discuss that."

I bet he hadn't! He would rather pretend to be an "expert" on economics, positing his theories for saving us all from catastrophe, whereas in reality he and his other colleagues had helped create the banking crisis and the Euro crisis.

Nice work if you can get it!

G.K. Chesterton Versus Richard Dawkins - GKC Wins!

2011-09-24T21:28:00.001+01:00

What a logo!

Taken from: Blame the 1st blog

"We are machines built by DNA whose purpose is to make more copies of the same DNA…It is every living object's sole reason for living." - Richard Dawkins

"It is as if a man were asked, "What is the use of a hammer?" and answered, "To make hammers"; and when asked, "And of those hammers, what is the use?" answered, "To make hammers again". Just as such a man would be perpetually putting off the question of the ultimate use of carpentry, so...all the rest of us are by these phrases successfully putting off the question of the ultimate value of the human life." - G. K. Chesterton

-----

Inspired by a blog post from True Freethinker: G.K. Chesterton nails Richard Dawkins

Can purpose exist without God?

In order to have purpose, something must have been created with an intended purpose, thus requiring a creator; therefore, in order for the universe (and the life that exists within it) to have purpose, it must have been created with an intended purpose, thus requiring a creator (otherwise known as God). If God does not exist, then nothing created the universe, and therefore the universe and everything within it exists without purpose.

Most atheists try to avoid this dilemma by explaining that, even though God does not exist to give the universe purpose, we can still give the universe (and our lives) purpose. True, but then what is the point? If the universe ultimately has no purpose, then what is the point of giving it purpose other than to hide the fact that it has no purpose?

Still others try to be more creative. For example, biologist Richard Dawkins explains that the purpose of life is to pass our genes to the next generation. While his atheistic clergy might find this explanation satisfactory, to the rest of us, it’s rather shallow, as it implies that the purpose of life is to create more life (and the purpose of that life is to create more life, and so on and so forth until the end of time). He might as well say that we exist for the sake of existing, which is less an explanation and more an excuse.

Then again, if you’re an atheist, what else do you have but excuses?

Democracy of Tradition

2011-09-24T20:48:00.000+01:00

Tradition is the extension of Democracy through time; it is the proxy of the dead and the enfranchisement of the unborn.

Tradition may be defined as the extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our father. I, at any rate, cannot separate the two ideas of democracy and tradition.

G.K. Chesterton

Atheism Killed 100 Million

2011-09-22T21:44:00.001+01:00

If there's one thing about atheists it's that they like to blame everything on God - who doesn't exist. Eh? So next they blame those of us taken in by the "god delusion."

We are thick, stupid and ignorant. They are all-wise, forward-thinking and intelligent. We believe in "myths" while they believe in (unproven) "facts" like the Big Bang and Evolution. They weren't there at the "Big Bang" nor have they found the 'missing link' -- it's a leap of faith you see.

They say that religion causes war, whereas atheism will bring peace to all mankind. The Brotherhood of Man. As well as being a cheesy 70s pop quartet that is a Masonic ideal. Like "equality." It sounds all fine and dandy, until you realise what it, and the manifestation of it in the real world, entails.

Atheism has always been the football of the Freemasons. They have sought to destroy Christianity via the promotion of atheism. That's why the French Revolution was followed inevitably by the Terror, the period when umpteen thousands lost their lives because they did not want to be part of the new atheist state, because they would not give up their Faith, they became 'enemies of the State,' as people who live under atheist regimes quickly find out to their cost, if you don't toe the line, they come down on you like a ton of bricks.

You see atheists like to put it about that they are "live and let live" kind of people. Some may think they are! Yet they and their ideal is essentially a negation of Christianity. They may warble on about Animists in Africa, and giggle at Aboriginal tales of creation, but these fireside stories of pagan peoples are brought in to the mix to belittle Christianity - their Public Enemy Number One.

Atheism was born in Europe and is nurtured by European Freemasonry. They were behind the French Revolution. They supported the Bolshevik Revolution (as did the Wall Street Banks run by mega-rich atheists, Masons and anti-Christians). They will always support any movement that seeks to overthrow Christianity, because Christianity is the number one enemy.

On Twitter recently I have been arguing with a band of atheists (I know, pearls before swine), and have said to them that the officially atheist USSR murdered millions of Ukrainian Christians. This is atheism. They will not have it. They argue it's political. They argue not all atheists are Communists.

But they are twisting (or spinning) the facts. An officially atheist state murdered millions of Christians, as policy. Just as they shut down churches. Just as they put Christians in the gulags.

The facts speak for themselves. As does the anti-Christian hatred of the atheists across Europe (all backed by Masonic ideals) whether in Spain, Hungary, France... these atheists forces were spurred on by a hatred of Christianity. Remember the dead bodies of nuns exhumed on the steps of the local church and opened to rot in the sun? That was done by the "democrats" - the Republicans - in the Spanish Civil War. Were the nuns "fascists"? No, they were dead women. The Republicans, democrats or whatever the hell they were did that because they were atheists and hated Christianity!

Can you imagine a Christian army that would dig up dead atheist nobodies, and dump the bodies in the street outside some atheist building, just to make a point? Out of pure hatred? No, neither can I.

Now the atheists always point at religion as being responsible for wars. They ignore that most wars in history were over land, wealth, ascendancy etc. and often between cousins, related peoples etc. Think of the wars between England and France (at the time both Catholic nations) primarily because England was ruled by a Francophone monarchy with a claim (rightful or dubious depending whether you were English or French) to the French crown and lands. It was essentially a family squabble, you might compare it to the War of the Roses.

Yet many atheists will sit and say that the wars like these were caused by religion. How absurd.

The only wars caused directly by religion were those of the Crusades and those following the Reformation, and in those limited cases we should remember that (as with irreligious or 'normal' wars) there are things known as "just wars" and those known as "unjust wars."

One thing is perfectly clear though, in the whole history of the wars "caused by religion" (as opposed to territorial or national wars) these pale in significance to the 100 million people killed by Communism in the 20th Century alone.

Dare I remind you that Communism is/was an atheist creed? Some would argue its very raison d'etre is to wipe out Christianity, so that the poor sods left living worship the State and only the State.

If we had a State in the 20th century that was officially theist, and its policy was the spread of Christianity (hint: there are none now, France long has been Masonic, the UK too, as was the USA from its inception), that murdered dozens of millions of atheists in its policy to impose Christianity on the world, then the atheist apologists on Twitter and elsewhere would be screaming from the very rooftops!

Yet we had a State that was officially atheist. It was called the USSR. It murdered many dozens of millions of innocent men, women and children because they were Christians. They were killed because Christians were a threat to their Brave New World, their atheist state, which would export its atheist materialism across the world.

The atheists who like to bang on about the Franco-Anglo wars between inter-related Royalty in which mostly professional soldiers and army conscripts died as internecine squabbles over land and power rumbled back and forth for years, get all defensive when the deliberate murder of millions of Christians is brought up.

They twist, they turn, the squeal, they screech. Oh the usual words such as "bigot" are thrown around willy-nilly and even "conspiracy" as they deny history and the death of millions at the hand of a state machinery (which should be illegal shouldn't it? - it is in Germany!).

You see one of the few officially atheist states in the world carried out the worst and biggest mass murder of men, women and children ever in the entire history of the world.

They can squeal and they can squirm, but no twisting the facts, no denying this holocaust, no misrepresentation, no calumnies against the innocent victims, can undo the horrific crime perpetrated by the officially atheist USSR against Christian victims.

Once again, I ask you: imagine if an officially Christian country (there are none today outside the Vatican City statelet, hardly a serious nation-state) purposefully wiped out millions of atheists as a matter of state policy to get rid of atheists or break their resolve as a thorn-in-the-side of the Christian state. Do you think those same atheists would say "oh no it wasn't a really Christian state" or "it's more complicated than that really?" -- These are people who say countless political/national/territorial/fratricidal conflicts were the fault of Christianity with little or no evidence.

Atheists killed 100 million people in the 20th Century. We can blame the Masons, the Communists, whatever. The fact remains:

ATHEISM KILLED 100 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE 20TH CENTURY.

So Mr. Beardie in your Hush Puppies, Mr. DJ Funk-master with your line of coke, Mr. City Banker with your house in the Cotswolds or Mr Anarcho-lefty with your black flag and allowance from mummy: accept the cold, hard fact that whatever else you may promise, the Brotherhood of Man quickly gives way to the State of the Gulag.

As GK Chesterton once said, the problem with atheism is not that when men stop believing in God they believe in nothing, rather that they will believe in anything. Even the worn out lies, hatred, spin, and fury of the atheists themselves, who will always push for what is not wanted or needed (gay marriage, legalisation of hard drugs, restriction of border controls, widespread abortion, break-up of the family and so on, etc. etc. etc.) simply because it helps bring about the end of the last vestige of Christianity in our society, cannot disguise these simple facts.

Man always needs a belief system and a moral code. Nature abhors a vacuum (especially when the football's on - sorry, dad joke). So without Christianity we have to have, one way or another, a replacement - that's when we end up with State Socialism, Bankers' greed, homo-rights, mass abortion, rampant usury, criminals' rights etc. etc. etc.

The atheists will promise peace but deliver war. They will promise happiness but deliver fear. They will promise love but deliver hatred. They will promise plenty but deliver want. They will promise freedom but deliver the gulag.

Remember. Atheism killed 100 million in the last century.

Given half a chance they would gladly do the same all over again. Their barely concealed hatred for those who "dare" to defend Christianity and Christian Truth is there for all to see. In 1917 the powerful Wall Street banks bank-rolled the Communist Revolution, because the same anti-God forces were at work in Wall Street. Today the children of 1968 run the EU. "Ex" Communists infest it from top to bottom, as can be seen from the laws their undemocratic executive pass against the family, against decency, for the atheist State etc. etc.

The names, places and means have changed. But the idea, the aim remains the same.

It started when they rounded up the "fascists." I did not speak out because I wasn't a fascist.
Then they rounded up the "pro-lifers." I did not speak out because I wasn't a pro-lifer.
Then they rounded up those opposed to gay "marriage." I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to gay "marriage."
Then they rounded up those opposed to immigration. I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to immigration.
Then they rounded up the Anti-EU lobby. I did not speak out because I wasn't in the anti-EU lobby.
Then they rounded up the Christians. I did not speak out because I wasn't a Christian.
Then they came for me...

Think on.

Who are the Zionist Front Group? EDL or BNP? or Both?

2011-09-20T22:35:00.003+01:00

In recent months the BNP leader has attacked the English Defence League as a Zionist front-group.

To be fair, the EDL is pro-Zionist. Yet so is the BNP as these choice quotes make clear:

Don't forget Griffin used his biggest nationwide media opportunity on the BBC's Question Time to promote the BNP as the one party that had given Israel unequivocal support in its assault on Gaza, Operation Cast Lead:
"There are Nazis in Britain and they loathe me because I have brought the BNP from being frankly an anti-Semitic and racist organisation into being the only political party which in the clashes between Israel and Gaza stood full-square behind Israel’s right to deal with Hamas terrorists."

Lee Barnes (in his days as a BNP legal representative and columnist) wrote on the BNP website:
"As a Nationalist I can say that I support Israel 100 % in their dispute with Hezbollah. In fact, I hope they wipe Hezbollah off the Lebanese map and bomb them until they leave large greasy craters in the cities where their Islamic extremist cantons of terror once stood."

-- as posted by "retread" on the British Democracy Forum.

Ipso facto, the BNP calling the EDL Zionist is more than a little silly. Is the BNP trying to reassure its grass roots (door closed, horse bolted) or merely trying to undermine the credibility of the EDL?

BNP and EDL: Opponent Spells Out His Warped Vision of Current Affairs

2011-09-19T22:32:00.000+01:00

Beware: this video contains some bad language:

This makes for an interesting video.The bloke is quite amusing, but twists the facts somewhat.

He knows that the media and the establishment can twist facts. Otherwise why would most Sun readers/Eastenders watchers think that our intervention in Libya was about saving lives and helping a group of people after "democracy."

He also knows that the media can "cover" a story, the equivalent of putting it on page 23, or publicise it by giving it prominence. Ipso facto how many people think that the (pro-Zionist) EDL's boss was in jail?

He is also being more than economical with the facts if he thinks an arrest for assault and then a ban from attending political rallies is not political. As ex-West London NF leader Phil Andrews found out to his cost in the 80s, one can be arrested for violence on little or no evidence. As for banning someone from specific political rallies - that is in reality being a political prisoner.

Don't even begin on the Zionist control of the media. That has been well documented and has nothing to do with the presenters and journalists. The American media especially is almost entirely Zionist owned. Only a fool would say otherwise. Various Jewish individuals have written about this, because they are proud of it (not to have a pop) therefore these facts are not the figment of anyone's imagination, not least people like the EDL boss who is very pro-Israel.

This chap also ignores the minutiae of the British media, in which multi-culti liberalism plays a huge part. So whilst the "Zionists" will appreciate a street movement that pushes the patriotic types toward Israeli policy (a road first trod by Mr Griffin), the liberal media will not want to promote the EDL boss's loss of liberty, just for addressing a political rally (even if it was a pro-Israeli one and he was dressed as a rabbi).

When dealing with the secret state, the media and suchlike, one is not dealing (if you'll excuse the pun) in black and white. This chap knows that of course, unless he is a complete arse. Think of Northern Ireland where the state has assets in Loyalist and Republican groups, even if some might simplify that situation to say the Loyalists were pro-British State and the Republicans were anti-British State. This would not stop the State from having assets in both, saying different things, pushing in various directions. Some may be promoted by the media, some ignored, depending on the ideology of the reporters, depending on the State policy at that time, and 101 other permutations.

So enjoy the video. The bloke is amusing. But don't be fooled. The BNP is likely to fold. It has certainly already collapsed. Another safety valve will come to the fore. It may be the EDL, it may be some other grouping.

The main picture to keep in mind is that the world financial system is usurious and run by the Rothschilds and their lieutenants. The political system is Masonic and the left/right dichotomy is in the pockets of the bankers. The mass media is controlled and will never defend the interests of the people.

Whatever simple idiots like this might say, we are just sheep paying taxes and having our rights taken away and our birth-right ripped from us. Democracy is a sham under the control of international financiers - the New Unhappy Lords that GK Chesterton warned us about and AK Chesterton wrote in-depth about.

In the years in between things have worsened.

Mass immigration, homosexual "rights," out of control abortion, war after unjustified Zionist war, drugs rampant, usury that has put billions out of work, taxation that is rapacious (mostly to pay uncontrollable usury-debt), an EU into which money is poured as in into a bottomless pit, and many other evils in which none of us had a say.

Democracy is a joke. Were our fathers asked in the 40s if millions of non-Whites should be allowed in? And on all the other issues above, we've been lied to, facts have have been twisted, and the controlled mass media has been used to con us all.

"Anti-racists" are like the peaceniks of the 60s. They are today's "useful idiots." But instead of being the 'useful idiots' of the USSR with its gulags full of Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc., they are the 'useful idiots' of those who wish to enslave the world because they are set out to destroy all nationality, all national pride that allows peoples to stand as-one in defiance of destruction and slavery (whether the native Indians of the Americas or the white Christian communities of Europe).

Once we lose our nationalism, our sense of patriotism, our belief that we are rooted in the land (blood and soil) that our forefathers worked, defended and lived on, then we lose the will to defend that land from the New Unhappy Lords: the EU Commissioners, the Rothschilds, the media moguls and all who seek to turn us into coffee coloured, brain-dead, tax-slaves too busy singing 'One World' anthems to see that we are mice in the laboratory of the mega-rich banksters who own the world through the creation of usury-debt.

Remember your traditions. Hold fast to the Faith of your fathers. Stand firm on the soil on which they toiled and bled. Defend the family with all your might.

We all have a duty to fight. We can fight in our daily lives. Fight in the way we bring up our children. Fight in the way we spread our ideas and educate others.

To not fight is to accept slavery and join the unthinking drones who do not see the Rothschild puppet masters controlling the rent-boy politicians.

Freedom or slavery? The choice is quite easy isn't it?

This Week's Quote: Tony Soprano on the Talmud

2011-09-18T13:14:00.001+01:00

Shlomo: "As the Talmud Says..."

Tony Soprano: "I don't give a s##t what he says."

~ The Sopranos

More Zionist War, More Homosexual 'Rights', It's NuLab 2.0

2011-09-18T10:47:00.004+01:00

The Rothschilds create money so buy politicians

Like NuLab before them there seem to be two preoccupations with the ConDem government. As with Blair, so with Cameron (Blair 2.0)

They are:

The onwards march of the Neo-Con/Rothschild agenda via unjust wars.
The onwards march of the liberal/Masonic agenda via the promotion of homosexual "rights."

It seems bizarre (or would do if we didn't know the real agenda of, and the matters of real importance to, this and previous governments) that Cameron, like Blair, would waste so much time and money on these two prongs of government policy, when that time, effort and money could be used to help those battling to make ends meet following the tax-payers' multi-billion pound bail-out of the banks.

Do unjust, highly questionable and morally bankrupt foreign wars help those who have lost jobs?
Do more highly questionable "laws" promoting the agenda of the morally bankrupt pink lobby help those whose businesses are teetering on bankruptcy?
Does spending billions on yet more overseas Rothschild 'adventures' help OAPs struggling to pay heating bills?
Does wasting parliamentary time on yet another "law" to promote sodomy help workers who have to choose between paying bills or buying food?

It is my view that the Neo Con and homosexual agendas show where the loyalties, interests and perceived duties of the politicians lie.

In a recent article I was reading it described the politicians as the rent boys of international finance. This seems so apt, on so many levels!

Another quote I read from a Rothschild matriarch many, many years ago went along the lines of "If the Rothschilds didn't want any wars, there would be no wars."

Remember these people own a huge bulk of the world's wealth (I read a recent estimation that it was half), that they can buy, bribe, cajole and bankroll all the political rent-boys they want, and that is why we have had so many dodgy wars, justified in the most ridiculous ways, and so many laws promoting homosexuality - hardly a matter of national importance.

When our government should be protecting our people from rapacious usury, when our government should be putting money into helping crumbling communities, and when our government should be using parliamentary time to remedy so many social ills and economic woes - we must ask why they are pushing for needless, unjust wars and so many pro-homosexual laws.

In a week when alleged cocaine usage by a very senior member of the government is being touted by a call-girl, it is not wrong for many of us to ask why those with so many peccadilloes, with so little backbone, and with such a willingness to go gung ho for an agenda that undermines the good that is left in Britain, are the ones leading our country.

Their subservience to the bankers, the Neo Con war-machine, the pink lobby, the Israeli lobby... shows where their loyalties lie.

Just this week news leaked out that the British state has tweaked the rules so Israeli war criminals can now come to the UK without fear of being arrested.

Do you still think we live in a "democracy" -- or an oligarchy that does what is told by the Rothschild elite and their hirelings?

Various Nu Lab people used to say that the most important role for a government is to protect its people, as they led us into expensive, illegal wars. Yet what protection do any of the hirelings and rent boys offer us from the bankers, the war machine, the tidal wave of drugs and the homosexual agenda?

Very little.

And so the rot continues. Not in spite of the government, but because of the government.

Happy Owain Glyndwr Day!

2011-09-16T15:58:00.001+01:00

A very happy Owain Glyndwr Day to all our Welsh readers and all true patriots everywhere.

If their is a lesson of Glyndwr's rebellion it is surely that the leader of a rebellion against those who would deny national freedom can come from the most unlikely of places, and that freedom can be within our grasp sooner than we think.

Cymru Am Byth! (trans: "the saucepan is on the fire").

Shocking Pic of David Cameron's NF Past

2011-09-15T16:27:00.000+01:00

Entering tabloid media mode:

Yes! Shock Horror!

It's David "Call me Dave" Cameron's secret "Nazi" past.

Whilst other Tories were buggering each other before Monday Club meetings, or pocketing thousands via lucrative bank placements and non-executive roles in arms manufacturers before voting for wars, Mr. Cameron was known as "Nazi Dave" down the Fleece n Ferkin, Smethwick.

"Oh yeah," recalls the old landlord Steve Bloke "He'd come in here giving it large, doing 'Itler salutes and suchlike, saying as how all them black fellas needs to shove off 'ome. Fair upset Leroy off of the darts team. Now can I have that tenner?"

His headmaster, Gerald Huffington-Poshly, has vivid memories: "Damn and blast his eyes. Cameron Junior had his whole life ahead of him. He could play a decent round of polo, and was a half-decent fag for that Rothschild chappy, then he blew it all by getting with these oiks and turning up for classes with a false toothbrush moustache. By Jupiter, what a daft cove. Terribly upset young Crown Prince Leroy from Zimboozooland (formerly Rumbababawe)."

A close friend of Mr Cameron's, Stanley Madeupname, said "This will rock the government to its foundations. Thank Allah we have the Daily Moron to bring us the truth."

More tomorrow in your super soaraway Daily Moron.

BNP Panorama Update

2011-09-14T07:50:00.002+01:00

According to some reports the BBC Panorama programme on the BBC will air on 26th September.

More news when we get it.

9 Romac Workers Sacked as BNP Leaves Bill Unpaid - Alleges Firm

2011-09-13T12:30:00.000+01:00

Tip of my Stahlhelm to GriffinWatch blog for publishing this.

New BBC Panorama Programme on Nick Griffin's BNP

2011-09-12T22:18:00.000+01:00

BBC Reporter investigating the BNP

So the BBC Panorama team are putting their final touches to the programme about the BNP.

Whilst we cannot celebrate an attack on nationalism by the enemies of the nation, by the products of the Frankfurt School, Marxists promoting liberalism; it is still the case that the BNP has sullied nationalism, through greed, nepotism and cronyism.

The BNP was happy to use the enemy media when it was promoting the idea of a "changed" BNP and a changed nationalism, when it was reaching out for Jewish votes, when it was defending Israeli democracy, when it was embracing civic patriotism and the idea of coloured members, and so on ad nauseum.

Now the chickens are coming home to roost.

Some say the BNP in its current form needs to die for nationalism to grow. Some say its death is part of the long term plan of our enemies, just as they built up C18 and used their assets to rip apart nationalism before consigning it to the dustbin of history. Who knows the real facts, who knows who are the assets, who are the ones motivated solely by greed and ego?

As the punk band Conflict used to say, we'll all need our 'Bull###t detectors' when the programme does air: but the sad thing is that the train wreck the BNP has become financially, which no doubt the BBC will be fixated upon, is as nothing to the political damage already done to nationalism.

The quasi-Zionism: it's all the fault of the "muzzies."
The civic nationalism: Sikhs, Zimbabweans.
The councillors who did nothing or were left without any back-up or resources.

It's all left nationalism in a weaker state, because the next sell-out or snake oil salesman who comes along will fool enough of the people for enough of the time to do untold damage yet again.

Perhaps that's a failure of nationalism. Perhaps it's a failure of human nature.

The sad thing is that whatever muck the BBC rakes through they won't be attacking nationalism for being nationalist, there will be real dirt, real slime and real degenerates. And even with our BS-detectors on maximum filter, we know that a good lot of it will be palpably true.

That the BNP got away with so much for so long without the disparagement of our enemies (bar some minor shots across the bow) in the BBC and mass media spoke volumes. Some say this was because the work of making nationalism a quasi-Zionist force in the shadow of the false-flag op known as "911" was ongoing. Those who think that way may now think that the BNP is no longer needed for that role, especially with the rise of the even more pro-Zionist EDL (even the BNP knew it would political suicide to wave Israeli flags!).

Whatever the truth of the matter, things are changing. With the bailiffs knocking on an MEP's door and a lot of court cases bringing further debts to the door of the BNP, we have to wonder what will be the real legacy of Nick Griffin's BNP.

Political betrayal, cronyism and nepotism, corruption and thievery, degenerates and (granny) pornography, wasted opportunity... it's not a pleasant picture and we can expect the BBC to wallow in the mire. The truth is that dogs will always behave like dogs, so we should expect no different from the media hirelings: but we should expect better from nationalists!