The Paper Money Calf, the New Unhappy Lords: Consume, Obey, Pay.

Bow down and worship the new gods.

The time of the golden calf is past. Worship the paper money calf.

These are the new unhappy lords, backed by the shysters of Wall Street and the spooks of the CIA.

Those who refuse to worship will face sanctions and war.

They want unquestioning consumers. 'Old fashioned' ideas such as Faith, Family and Nation are outmoded to these new gods. Heritage and history are irrelevant.

Consume! Pay the bills. Pay usury debt. Hand over your taxes for the government's usury debt.

The billionaires, the media moguls, the international financiers, the multinational bosses all want more of your money, they want billions poured on billions, while you may struggle to make ends meet. If using political and Christian prisoners in China or using sweat shops in the Third World helps their global profits: so be it. If that means exporting more jobs from Europe: so be it.

Making enough money is not an option. Call it gluttony, call it greed, call it obscene -- mega-profits are all that matter. Mega-bucks for them and their political hirelings.

So consume what they churn out.

Consume. Obey. Pay.

Do not speak out. Do not stand up for your Faith, for your Family, or for your Nation. Do not rock the boat. That is what terrorists and extremists do.

What are you? Do you believe in this wonderful live-and-let-live democracy? Or are you like some sort of Muslim outsider? Or an evil fascist?

Consume. Obey. Pay.

Workers of the World Unite - You Need More Slavery & Bosses

1898 artwork by Caran D'Ache

This artwork is very interesting.

In the first picture the worker is under the weight of the monarchy/rich.

Interestingly we see the Church in the background. Today of course Communists (founded and egged on by Anti-Christ Talmudics) and atheists (ditto) say the Church suppressed the workers on behalf of the rich.

As anyone who has studied history and Church teaching knows, the Church acted as Europe's conscience, pushing the rich to give alms to the poor. The church provided hospitals for the sick and infirm, provided peppercorn rents for workers (who would, post-Reformation be thrown of the land, which the uncontrolled rich enclosed*)

Just as things worsened for the poor after the Reformation, when the King, monarchy and rich were no longer controlled by the Church and its laws,  so after the French Revolution they worsened considerably.

In D'Ache's picture we see the Royalty replaced by the bankers, Freemasons and rich; whilst their daily toil did not improve or worsened under the weight of the new elites.

This is the reality. The rulers had to jettison Christianity's hold over society - and especially its ethical and moral rules on economics and commerce, which allowed Capitalism to rise, with its new elites based on money-power, usury and greed. This in turn was used by the Judeo-Masons as an excuse to organise Communist groups as the "answer" to the slums and poor conditions created by Capitalism.

Communism, of course, does not give freedom, but yet more slavery, more despots, more centralised wealth, and so the con goes on, mirrored today in the Left V Right see-saw of politics. Taxes continue, Usury and Bank-Cons go on, immoral anti-family laws roll on...

And the poor, hard-working people plod on under the weight.

Of course, back in the day I suppose the bankers and reds never had Eastenders to tell the dim-witted what was right or acceptable.



* Read William Cobbett's History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland for a superb socio-economic analysis of these events (btw Cobbett was not a Catholic).

Who Runs Our Government? Lessons from Greece and Italy

Who Does Our Government Serve?

"[Goldman Sachs is] a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jabbing its blood funnel into anything that smells like money"

- Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone magazine

What have recent events concerning the collapse of the Euro and Bankers' greed taught us?

GREECE:

1. That the Greek people weren't allowed to have their say.
2. That a former European Central Banker is the new boss of Greece.
3. Greece will now be forced to strip workers, pensioners etc, via "austerity measures" to pay back bankers.

ITALY:

1. The Italian people haven't yet been allowed to have their say.
2. A former Euro-Commissioner (unelected) is being lined up to take over.
3. The Italian parliament has rubber stamped "austerity measures" as per Greece.

UK:

1. Tax-payers will give billions to the IMF which will bail out the Euro (i.e, pay back bankers).
2. We will get no (promised!) referendum on the EU.
3. "Austerity measures" continue as bankers line-up to make billions out of Euro transactions.
4. The Church of England appoints a free-marketeer banker to its body to look at banking.

Our governments are run by and for bankers! Not for the people who pay their bills.

Addressing city bankers before he became PM David Cameron said:

“My father was a stockbroker, my grandfather was a stockbroker, my great-grandfather was a stockbroker”. 

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Meanwhile Goldman Sachs, the bank at the centre of the US credit crunch was also the bank that fiddled Greece's books, enabling it to join the Euro in the first place, and it carries on doing what it does best - practicing usury to fill its own coffers, profiting as those dumb goy tax-payers suffer, yet again.

===

Read this amazing article by Alex Brummer. Replace "Anglo-Saxon Capitalism" with what it is - "Anglo-Jewish usury/Capitalism" and this article goes some way to nailing what is wrong:

Goldman Sachs Caused Crunch Then Profits from It

"[Goldman Sachs employees fill] the top jobs in the Treasuries, central banks and stock exchanges around the world where, like members of a secret society, they are able to ensure the wealth of the next generation of Goldmanites"

All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace: A Must See for anyone Interested in "Jewish Revolutionaries"

Last night's BBC documentary All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace, made by Adam Curtis who produced The Power of Nightmares, was very interesting.

Right: Alan Greenspan, boss of the private bank the Federal Reserve, which keeps Americans as tax-debt-slaves. The main follower of "Rand"/Rosenbaum is now one of the most powerful men in the world.

It showed that the ideology behind consumerism, banking free markets, individualism, etc. that the internet, dot.com bubble and banking boom of the 90s was run by the usual suspects.

Ayn Rand, the basis of the first episode was born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum. Curtis neglects to tell us this, perhaps for fear of being labelled an Anti-Semite.

Her ideology "Objectivism" - is pure individualism, one might say Thatcherism taking to an extreme, and devoid of morality. One of her top followers was Alan Greenspan. Her grouplet fell apart when she had an affair with one of her married followers.

Degenerates, Talmudic bankers, et al. These are the Modern Degenerates and Jewish Revolutionaries written about by E Michael Jones. They dress themselves up in new clothes, tweak their ideologies (just as Neo Cons went from being Marxists to Free Marketeers), anything to create a One World, Talmudic, Banking-led, godless world.

Just as Bolshevism in 1917 and the creation of the Federal reserve in 1913 - these people are only interested in having a Masonic elite ruling over us plebs.

Times change. Names change. But the ideologies and aims remain much the same.

I am reminded of the time the "dissidents" in Iran staged their demonstrations. Thousands of people took to the streets (kind of like the anti-war or pro-hunting demos here), and the Western media spun it into 'the people' rising against a corrupt oligarchy. This was fueled by the 'democratising' Twitter phenomenon. Only it transpired that so many Twits, Twuts or Twats, were coming out of areas like New York and Jerusalem.

This is what the "democratic internet" people do not understand. Just as the elites realised that they could control the mass media, through advertising revenues, direct control by oligarchies etc., so they can control the internet, by orchestrated campaigns dumping sheer volumes of Tweets, emails, reports etc., the setting up of "alternative" or news sources - and so much more.

If Twitter were the answer, the BBC wouldn't refer to it every time there is some sort of crisis or regime change in the world.

As Curtis's documentary made clear - just as with the Bolshevik Revolution (which was also Talmudic and godless) this revolution of computing mass-democratising individualism, led to yet more centralised control by a Talmudic few (in this case Greenspan and the Federal Reserve and the big Wall Street banks).

Plus ca change.

Immigration: All the Parties Lie

Miliband ally admits that Labour lied over immigration.

We all know that Labour WANTED more immigrants. Blair and an advisor planned it to undermine "racism."

We all know that Big Business wanted it to keep wages low.

Yet again we the people suffer so the core values of Socialism and Capitalism can be advanced.

Professor David Harvey: A Critique of Capitalism... but no answers?

Is the 'Marxist Ideologue' Professor David Harvey searching for Distributism?

He makes a devastating critique of Capitalism... but struggles to find the answers.

After the slow death of Capitalism and Socialism, and the near collapse of Capitalism, it is obvious that people who want Social Justice are searching for answers.

Nationalists must be grown up enough to offer that answer for those sick of Capitalist greed and moribund state-control.

This is a fascinating interview that raises some salient points.

BBC i-player
(UK readers only)

Littlejohn, Global Warming & the 'Holocaust'

In today's Daily Mail Richard Littlejohn brings relief to the bloodied, encircled and battle-weary band of revisionists and their supporters who are painted as Beelzebub's followers in the modern media.

Right: Littlejohn, Melanie Phillips and countless other "right wing" columnists use Holocaustianity to silence criticism of Israel, the Zionist Lobby and everything they do and control.

He says:

"This column has been derided for claiming that belief in global warming is a religion, not a science."

Quite so Mr. Littlejohn!

But if this is the case, and if there is a racket going on - an "industry" if you will - with vast amounts of money involved, brow-beating of anyone who dares oppose it, a virtual media blackout of opposing voices and so on ad nauseum, what dare Mr. Littlejohn say about the Holocaust Industry (aka Shoa Business)?

With flimsy Soviet-built evidence, the word of profiteers and the backing of an Israeli Lobby that depends on Holocaustianity Guilt to get away with mass murder, illegal spy rings, illegal nukes, state-sponsored terrorism, torture, ethnic cleansing and much worse; we can safely say that if Global Warming is a religion then how much more so is Holocaustianity?

As writers better and braver than I have contested, Holocaustianity has sought to replace the Sacrifice of Christ on Calvary as the epicentre of history and the singular event in history that won man's deliverance, with the "sacrifice" of the alleged 6 million as the epicentre of history - an event which delivered a people (who have long derided Christ and His Death and Resurrection - Christ Deniers if you will) their State, Israel.

Holocaustianity has its shrines, its temples, its clerics, its followers, its preachers and more.

It also has a stranglehold on the media, with the likes of Littlejohn himself using it to excuse the worst excesses of Israeli murder and the leaked news of vile anti-gentile actions, guidelines and texts both ancient and modern that very rarely leak into the media.

Darwin's creed of evolution is also a religion, for there is no proof, there are no "missing links" and we are taught it as fact (not theory) in school. It too has its believers, its high priests, its structures and temples.

Some years ago a book on evolution was entitled "Why Colleges Breed Communists" as it argued that modern schools preached Darwinism to "prove" to schoolchildren that God didn't exist, the Creation was a myth.

In those same schools we now see Holocaustianity pushed, alongside Darwinism, rights for homosexuals, "safe sex" and all the rest of the modern world's creed.

If the Evolutionary Theory (yes, it is just a Theory) meant that 'Colleges Breed Communists' then you can be sure, dear reader, that Holocaustianity is pumped into our schools (not, you'll notice studies of Communism's gulags, or the role of Jewry in anti-Christian Communism) in an attempt to get our colleges to breed Zionists.

Once upon a time many people (sheep if you like, certainly many cattle - sorry - goyim) believed in the theory that Capitalism was the zenith of our Civilisation; that the Bankers were modern day gods and the almighty dollar was the altar at which they worshipped.

Recent events have in fact shown Capitalism to be the empty vessel that it was, with usury haven rotted out its insides and the greedy men at the top seen as the sordid little "Wizards of Oz" they undoubtedly are.

Recent events have also shown many people that Israel is in fact a bandit state almost choc full of a murderous, totally racist and anti-Christian people.

Despite the idea that Darwinism could breed Communists, almost half of British people don't believe in it; and many people are now starting to question Global Warming and its acolytes.

All of these false creeds are starting to crumble, for none of them can bear any close inspection and rely on the blind faith of their followers, coupled with the guilt, fear or greed of everyone else.

Of course Holocaustianity has the edge for the very notion of questioning it is illegal in several nations and is all but verboten in our "free" media.

When Communists, Zionists, Capitalists, Freemasons et al question Christianity they come up against a brick wall because the facts of it are undeniable. Its history is proven, its central tenets have been proven right time and time again, and its social teaching is for the betterment of man, families, communities and nations.

Their own creeds do not stand up to any scrutiny at all and have to constantly mutate, die and be reborn in order to hoodwink new generations into slavery and subservience.

Through the Centuries Christian Crusaders, preachers and stalwarts have faced down these enemies of civilisation, using debate and the sword to bring about their downfall. The difference today is that the enemies of civilisation, those who have stood behind the forces trying to subvert Christendom -- Judeo-Freemasonry -- are in the ascendancy and control our governments, the banks, the media et al. which is why they screech (like the "alien" Bodysnatchers in the film Invasion of the Bodysnatchers, which itself was a warning against Communism and how it subverts free minds) whenever a Revisionist rears his head or speaks the truth (witness Bishop Williamson).

Despite all this, one thing we can all be assured of is that when Holocaustianity and the rest of the modern world's creeds have crumbled, Christianity will still stand as it has for 2000 years. And Holocaustianity will be just another bad memory consigned to the dustbin with Communism, Capitalism and all the other "isms" that have assailed Christian Civilisation down the centuries.

When Leon Degrelle stood in the ruins of Europe in 1945 and the Red Beast was bearing down on central Europe, with its NKVD Commissars urging native Russians and others to take their revenge via rape, murder and pillage he knew that Europe would survive, that Communism would crumble and that Christianity would win through in places like Poland and Russia, with the spires of ancient churches (many laid low by the USAAF/RAF) would rise again.

The Roman Empire fed Christians to the lions, the Communists murdered millions of Ukrainian Christians, the Capitalists fed millions of Christians into their slave-like factories, mines and workhouses.

Holocaustianity is now attempting to brow beat anyone that opposes it into silence via jails and media approbation. Even Poles who tried to raise Crosses to remember Polish war dead at Auschwitz were assaulted, besmirched and thrown out by Zionist activists in their sheer hatred of anything Christian!

Perhaps the Zundels, Rudolfs and Mahlers of this world should join hands and start singing "we shall overcome" in order to win their freedom?

The modern jailers will get no further than their NKVD counterparts in the Ukraine of 1933 or Germany 1945.

As Christ Himself said: The Truth will set you free. Not that the bought and sold media columnists like Littlejohn would know that being Israel Firsters almost to a man.

In Hoc Signo Vinces.

Report Blames Selfish Parents for Childhood Problems

So the selfish individualism of the sons and daughters of the 60s generation has lead to children today being damaged, according to the largest report on the subject.

The Children's Society report had 35,000 contributors and places consumerism and selfishness at the heart of damage done to children.

We are told that more government initiatives and social engineering are the answer to the number of families with one parent or a step-parent.

The elephant in the room is the demolition of marriage that's occurred since the 50s/60s; the promotion of abortion and "gay rights" by a succession of governments and a benefits system which has, to use the parlance in vogue, "institutionalised" the attack on marriage.

It strikes me as common sense, that if we wish to create the best possible scenario across society and within families for the upbringing of children who, in turn, will be well developed and productive members of society, that a few simple steps need to be taken.

I'm thinking primarily of the cessation of "rewarding" single parents with council housing; of tax incentives for married couples and especially married couples with children; help and incentives for mums who make the decision (often financially detrimental) to stay at home to care for their children.

Moreover there needs to be a sea-change in public policy in regards to the family. The days of undermining the family at every turn has to end!

It's hardly rocket science!

Most people - even the politically correct - will acknowledge that the "nuclear family" is the best possible setting for the upbringing of children, so why on earth does the government promote "other forms" of parenting, co-habiting, civil-partnerships and the pic-n-mix 57 varieties of "families" to the detriment of the family?

We are all paying the cost whether it's in the taxes which go to social services, or the insurance premiums we pay on damage done by miscreants to our cars or homes, and many other ways in which the handful of failing quasi-families do.

In all the places I have lived in my meandering existence, I have noticed that most problems (if not outright crimes) in communities, from urban to suburban to outright rural, come from a small number of families in any one area.

If we can, as a society, put the family back as the cornerstone of society, promote the family as the best possible structure for bringing up children, give incentives for couples to marry and raise children... we will not only see less problems in our communities, but we might even begin to rectify many of the problems facing us as an ageing society.

A dwindling workforce and aging population means the pension system is crumbling and politicians (once this "credit crunch" ends will, again) tell us we "need" immigrants to work, fill posts and pay taxes.

Would we rather live in a greying, dying (and "browning") country, wherein the family decays, and where children with no male role model become ever more the norm, or a vibrant nation in which the family is placed at the centre -- and life and youth is seen as a gift, which will enable these isles to have a future?

Communists tried and failed to bring about the end of the family via collectivisation.

The Capitalists are now trying to bring about the death of the family via the burden of debt on families (forcing both parents to work) and the promotion of a "do what thou wilt" society where the golden calf of "choice" enables us all to be selfish, and sacrifice children or the care of children for own well-being.

Can we as nationalists raise the banner for the family? Can we show that the sacrifice needed to raise children, and to raise children well, is worthwhile: for us, for our community and for our nation?

Unfortunately there is no short-term fix. To put the family first is going to take years, if not decades, of hard slog and struggle. But, to be frank, we have no choice - because to do otherwise would be to surrender to the forces that are out to destroy every last vestige of family life.

It's going to take more that Tory-style empty slogans too.


Link
BBC on Childhood Report

Woolworths: The Sad Truth for Many

Being a family man I found myself in a town centre today, taking back a non-functioning electrical Christmas pressie (egged on by a distraught sprog).

The story ended happily when the item was replaced and we continued with our assortment of errands, some of a banking nature, some comestible (those corned beef pasties won't eat themselves y'know!) and others of a more commercial/fanciful ensemble.

All of a sudden I felt an urge to pop into the local Woolworths and witness a bit of history and so - admittedly with little persuasion (or percussion!) needed on my part with Mrs FC and the FC sprogs - we found ourselves in a very eerie and strange Woolworths shop.

Most of the shelves were empty, many of them with "sold" stickers on, with people buying the fixtures and fittings.

One wall even had photocopies of things as mundane as office chairs, the branch safe (empty?) and the staff cooker for sale. It made my pic n mix free for all ("5 sweets each kids! Fill yer boots" -- not literally obviously) seem a bit tame, as some local yokels filled trolleys with bits of display stands.

Now, I'm not one to shed a tear for unbridled Capitalism and Big Businesses, but as with many of those interviewed on the news viz this episode of the "Credit Crunch," I find it a bit sad to see this happen.

When I was knee-high to a grasshopper (a pre-FC sprog if you will) I remember going to visit one of my myriad of unrelated "aunties" who worked in 'Woolies,' standing on tip-toe as I tried to see over the counter. So it is that Woolworths entered the early memories of many people, and we all feel an era is passing.

So what should we feel with the passing of Woolworths? I can't feel sorry for Big Business or multinationals. I couldn't even tell you who owns Woolworths. But there are people we should feel sorry for: the 27,000 employees of Woolworths who face a future on the dole.

Unemployment can never be easy, but going onto the dole with so many others (add on those from MFI and other firms going bust) and at the start of a recession must seem like the beginning of a long black night for many of them.

And that's what went through my mind yesterday as I took in the vista of all the decimated shelving units and dismantled point-of-sale bumf languishing in corners.

It's easy for Gordon Brown to play "saviour of the world" because he's used our tax-money for generations to come (via enslaving us to a super-duper blow-your-mind national debt) to "bail out" the banks and keep the greedy amoral scum, who lived high on the hog whilst the debt bubble grew and grew, in their positions.

Yet he stands by useless as a chocolate teapot as 27,000 Woolworths employees - from the shelf-stackers, through the till-tappers to the junior management - get a Christmas Present of a P45.

The Saviour of the World - Super Gordon? - gets in debt with the banks to bail-out the banks (heads they win, tails you lose) and the "normal" folks get covered in guano.

Perhaps if the Woolworths staff had been as greedy and as avaricious, gambling other people's money, then Super Gordon would have forked out a few billion to bail them out too?

And why not!

Let Gordon do a one-off payment and convert Woolies into a Workers Co-Operative, wherein the workers split the profits depending on the hours they work.

It might just work. It might just save him much more in long term dole, housing benefit etc. It might just save the high street. It might just show that Super Gordon cares for more than just Banking Bosses and Car firms owned by Indians.

And, as I paid for the few goodies selling at 50% and walked out of Woolies probably for the last time, I couldn't help think of all this and of Gordon Brown's skewed sense of loyalty and proportion.

Still, at least so many of the banksters and City of London wide-boys enjoyed blow-out Christmas parties.

That must be a comfort to all those facing 2009 being unemployed.

He's Madoff With All the Money. But Is Bernard Jewish???

At this conjuncture I am tempted to make some long rambling point about the Madoff rip-off, the billions lost by banks, pension fund holders and others that will effect the least well off, the nature of Capitalism, the degraded status of Wall Street, and the people who pose the real threat to our society and our freedoms as opposed to CIA/Mossad created ghost threats.

But I don't want to be labeled an "anti Semite."

Besides, all this "Jewish" nature of money scams, such as with Ron Sandler and the whole sub-prime mortgages fiasco which has ended with millions getting thrown on the dole, can do nothing but endanger 'good community relations,' further stereotypes of Jews being money-grabbers and swindlers, and persuade some people that the very heart and soul of Capitalism is vampiric, usurious and Talmdudic.

And I would not want to partake in such an endeavour. Tsk.

So I'll let you draw your own conclusions. In an atmosphere of love, respect, tolerance and humanism.

Happy Hannukah! ;-)


Link:
A Talmudic Blog Weeps
Madoff Hits Jewish Charities (Hey - is he an anti-semite?)

Nationalist Economics have the Answer!

THE SYSTEM IS CRUMBLING

Right: The political, Big Business and Zionist New Unhappy Lords are out for total control and do not want to give up any slice of their pie - let alone total freedom - to us as nations, communities or families.

So according to Murdoch-employee Andrew Neil, prime minister Gordon Brown, leader of the opposition David Cameron, the BBC, every MP, economics "experts," the TV talking heads etc. etc. we have no alternative but to prop up global Capitalism, bail out the banks, and increase the National Debt by billions more!

In essence they say: 'fix the bursting debt bubble by injecting more debt into it.' Have you ever heard of anything so preposterous? They may as well say smother that conflagration with this petrol-soaked blanket.

It doesn't take a genius to spot the flaw there! Keynsian economics to the max: spend, spend, spend, pile it on and sod tomorrow!

When the bigger bubble bursts what will they do? Borrow trillions more? And then what? Zillions? And then onto the sorts of words we used to make-up in school: gaggillions... bazzillions... gigantazillions...

The "world economy" is destined - medium or long term - to go the way of Zimbabwe's economy, especially as Gulag-China won't be around to bail-out Big Business with its cheap labour and concentration camp goods next time around.

The debt bubble can do nothing but grow and grow. It's all the banksters know and all the politicians will allow to happen: for even to glimpse debt-free finance in any real way will blow the whole thing apart.

There are three simple answers to the problem, all of them Christian and rooted in Christian Social Teaching, all of them help the people, but the problem is that all of them would take power away from the banksters, from their hired political party apparatus and most of all from the powerful Masonic elite.

That is why the BBC, the politicians and the (CIA/MI5-employed) economic "experts" and all the other Masons, Trilaterals, Bilderbergers, financiers etc., will not even mention these alternatives: for fear of undermining their total control of economic and political power.

Those answers are:

• Social Credit.
• Distributism.
• The Guilds.

So let's deal with each of these in turn. As you will see each in its own way deals with a specific part of society (1. Money and Banking, 2. Families and Communities, 3. Government and Politics) and I see no reason why the three cannot interlink and create a society that is fair, just, debt-free, truly democratic and which also rewards hard work.

1. Social Credit.

Basically this is the simple matter of a government issuing its own money as a credit. In other words money (printed, in ledgers, on pc screens etc.) is created by the state and not "borrowed" into circulation.

There is no reason for a government to borrow money (Bank of England or IMF) when it can create that same money and have no debt attached to it!

Most people assume that the money with the Queen's head on is issued by the government anyway and in the spending of money etc. it would make no difference to anyone.

The huge difference would be in there being no national debt.

Social Credit could also be used on a local level, with Council Tax Credits and similar. With no debt-money the debts of government, local and national, would be non-existent and so taxes could be slashed hugely and monies raised via taxation (and those raised via creating money) could be spent where needed on the NHS, schools, infrastructure, sea defences...

Of course there have to be controls (just as there are meant to be controls today - and that's a bloody joke!) but within these criteria there would be a sensible, sane answer to debt and the debt bubble (with its "boom and bust").

So that's banking, debt, inflation and taxation "sorted," which in turn will help create the conditions for implementing a huge programme of social justice initiatives...

2. Distributism.

Distributism would in essence allow families to own their own homes and their own businesses. Usury-free loans could replace mortgages. The right to property would be enshrined in law, as would be a limit on the size of home and land ownership, and (as Belloc discussed in Restoration of Property) a J curve of taxation on businesses to prevent them becoming "too big" and the homogenisation, and bully boy tactics that the likes of Tescos or Sainsbury's bring about.

Enshrining the right to property in law prevents people being kept as disinherited slaves, a move to workers co-operatives helps move away from the "them and us" mentality of Capitalism.

Of course there are 101 ways a government of the day can help via thoughtful home building (e.g. more family farms, the break of wasteful large estates and absentee agri-businesses, tax-incentives for co-operatives, promotion of local produce etc. All of which ties us in with No. 3.

3. The Guilds.

Bizarre though it may seem to us in Britain today, but the Guilds is the most tried, tested and successful of these nationalist economic standards. It is impossible for enemies to dismiss it as a "theory" or "utopian."

For hundreds of years in the Middle Ages the Guilds were a centrepiece of trade, community, family and social life.

The purpose of guilds covers so much you should really read one of our books (eg. Penty's) but to summarise, it covers training and trade education; employment and social care; fair and just prices; protection against shoddy goods and work; community cohesion; and (recallable!) representation in local and national politics.

Furthermore, thanks to numerous Church encyclicals on the state of the working classes, and condemning Communism and Free Trade Capitalism, the ideals of the Guilds were taken up across Europe in the early 20th Century by the "fascist" movements who sought a Third Position beyond Capitalism and Communism and who also sought to defend Christian civilisation from the Soviets and the Bankers.

Although the Guilds were known as Corporations in Italy, the name Corporatism doedn't really fit the bill in the Anglo-Saxon world because we tend to think of large corporations and multi-nationals, which is a world away from what the Guilds were all about.

The 1980s (Distributist) NF picked up on the idea of Guilds, but instead of concentrating on English and European political or social history chose the Libyan-model used by Gaddaffy, which was used by erstwhile Neo-Cons to bash them. In hindsight the NF would have got further if it had chosen the works of Penty and other Guildsmen or the medieval examples from across Europe.

Conclusion.

So whether we're thinking of macro or micro economics; whether we are thinking about inflation and national debt, or the family farm and the quality of foodstuffs: from one end to the other, in a society that is empowered from the roots up, which is built on the cornerstone of the family, which is secure because it is free of usury-debt.

Socialism is dead and discredited. Capitalism is dying a slow and painful death.

What is amusing is that we have these Christian social and economic answers that would benefit everyone, and yet our "leaders" (allegedly Christian to a man) would rather sweep them under the carpet for fear of upsetting the International Financiers and Banksters.

It shows who they put first.

Should we support our people or the banksters?

Should we support British commerce and businesses or Chinese Gulag-Capitalism?

Should we live more mortgage-slavery (and repossession) years or usury-free ownership and freedom?

Should we pay billions in taxes to pay an obscene national debt forever or slash taxes dramatically?

Should we give hundreds of thousands the freedom of family farms, self-sufficiency and property security or continue with wage-slave, rabbit hutch homes?

Detractors

The trolls on the left and right, in America and Europe, can point and mock. Many of them are paid by (or bought by!) Communists or Neo Cons and seek to defend the indefensible (yes, both Communism and Usury have been totally and utterly condemned by Christians and/or Nationalists since the outset of both alien creeds: promoted by those who profit the most - the same anti-National and anti-Christian creed).

They can say - wrongly - that none of this is tried and tested, but when all we have known is slavery for hundreds of years, is it wrong to seek a way out of that slavery? If we can take the best from before the advent of Capitalism and the best of ideals opposed to both Capitalism and Socialism in the 20th Century we can create an answer that will give us hope for the 21st Century.

Social Credit. Distributism. The Guilds.

Each of these will give our peoples freedom.

Our opponents and the powers-that-be will denounce them all as "anti-Semitic" but that merely shows who is oppressing our people, if the answers to that oppression are given such epithets.

For the rest of us such labels are meaningless. We have a simple choice: freedom or slavery.

"Only Show in Town" lie from System Stooge

Capitalism isn't dead: but it is discredited and because it is based on unpayable debt, and has been bailed-out by piling on more unpayable debt.

[image deleted]

Right: Andrew 'Brillo' Neil (left) showing his campaigning zeal for harmony between the races - and the generations!

Socialism isn't dead: but it is comatose after the fall of the USSR and the conversion of China to Gulag-Capitalism.

Funnily enough in an interview, the "Dragon's Den" businessmen Duncan Bannatyne said that whilst businessmen create wealth through their enterprises, the Capitalists are those in the large glass buildings who shuffle bits of paper and move money from one to the other in essence creating nothing.

How right he is! Almost.

Only it's worse because they move "money" that often doesn't exist, it's usury-debt, it's entries in ledgers or on pc-screens.

So whilst they only "create" debt and shuffle the debts around and take hard-earned money from businesses in a Wizard of Oz atmosphere (where we're all supposed to be impressed by their glass towers and marble pillars) businesses (that includes family concerns, farms etc.) have to pay them usurious interest as well as all the local and national taxes that go to paying the unpayable debts accrued by local and national government.

That is where many people make the mistake.

They think just because someone runs a business he is a Capitalist.

Businesses existed before the advent of Capitalism and there is nothing Capitalist per se in running a business. It is when the scale of a business becomes detrimental to society, or when a business seeks to freeze out competitors that it takes on the role of a Capitalist concern.

Andrew Neil, the politico and newspaper editor was interviewing Ballatyne and he finished the piece by stating that Capitalism would morph into a new style to work around the current difficulty, because (after the fall of Socialism) there was no other blueprint for a society.
Ahem!

Really?

There is no alternative to issuing money as a debt?

There is no alternative to property in the hands of the few (banks or State)?

There is no alternative to government run by the banks for the banks?

There is no alternative to a system that sees finance as its primary concern and the family as of secondary importance?

And yet people like Andrew Neil - affectionately or otherwise known as Brillo in the pages of Private Eye - claim that Capitalism (with all its injustices, all its evils and all its integral debt-finance) is - to coin a certain phrase - the "only show in town."

As if we should accept something that is corrupt, Masonic, cronyist and degenerate just because it's rigged to be "the only show in town" by those on the take.

Is Mr. Neil really so obtuse as not to be aware that there is an alternative to both Capitalism and Socialism?

Can we rely on a man's judgement who owes his position to the uber-Capitalist, Neo-Con/Zionist Big Businessman and pal (sorry, owner!) of politicians: Rupert Murdoch.

Anyone who's tied in with a system and who's profited from that system who then says - to paraphrase - 'look it's the best we can hope for and there's no alternative' should not be taken at face value, not least because he has a vested interest.

Here endeth lesson.



Link:
Andrew Neil biog

FC Poll Result on Bank Crash and Bail Out

Does the Banks Crashing and "Bail Out" Mean:

The Death of Capitalism	4 (13%)
The Growth of Mega-Banks	11 (36%)
Just a Blip and Nothing will Change	1 (3%)
The growth of an Obscene National Debt	9 (30%)
The Poor get poorer and the Rich get Richer	14 (46%)
It was an Accident that Caught out the Banksters	1 (3%)
It was a Deliberate Event to Capitalise on the Debt Bubble	10 (33%)

An interesting feedback here with many people seeing dire events, yet very few seeing is as the death of Capitalism.

The overall 'flavour' of the poll seems to be that the whole debacle will simply make things worse for us whilst the banks will benefit in one way or another.

BHS Boss Buying Up in Iceland

What an edifying sight to see "Sir" Phillip Green (boss of British Home Stores - BHS - and other high street outlets) scuttling about in Iceland seeking to buy up a wedge of the Icelandic retail sector (which controls not a few UK high street names) at a knockdown price.

It seems that just as Ron Sandler brought about the "credit crunch" via his sub prime mortgage racket in America, so the likes of Phillip Green are circling to make a quick buck from others' misery.

Where are the Neo Cons screeching about the damage done by and the naked profiteering (carpet bagging?) by this breed of uber Capitalist? One thinks of the profits made by George Soros when the pound crashed in the 90s...

Oh no... they're not Muslims are they? Yet they all have the "right of return" to Israel.

So silence reigns.

Big Business Before Pensioners - Thanks Gordon Brown!

While the rains lash down and the weather worsens just imagine the Gas and Electric company bosses sitting around their heated pools (presumably somewhere overseas!) toasting our good health as we pay their inflated prices.

This week we saw where the politicians put their loyalties. Not with the people. Not with the poor. Not with pensioners. But with the company bosses who take MILLIONS in wages, bonuses and stock options.

Oh yes dear reader whilst teachers, coppers, nurses et al are urged to accept below inflation wage rises (in effect pay cuts) whilst the "credit crunch" bites, these fat cats get carte blanche to put their prices up and fleece us out of more money, money so many of us can ill afford as petrol and food prices rocket and wages stagnate.

The Capitalists say that markets will right themselves, the government shouldn't intervene to enforce price capping or a windfall tax. "Communism" they screech as they foam at the mouth.

Isn't it strange how it seems permissible for governments to intervene when the Capitalists, Big Businessmen etc. are in danger - witness the BILLIONS poured into Northern Rock, or the US Tax-Payers TRILLIONS poured into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The fat cats and usurers don't seem to screech "communism" then - when the system bails out their greedy, usurious, rip-off, money-grubbing ways.

It's only when the people ask their government - allegedly their representatives - to intercede on their behalf to rein in a little of the vast profits being grabbed by greedy utility companies that Capitalists start to screech about "Communism."

Oh no dear reader.

"Our" government isn't their to help us. It is there to bail out its big business, banking friends whenever they get in trouble!

It's like when the government says "our" security is No. 1 priority, whenever it brings out its "Al Qaeda" bogeyman. This is an absolute lie.

If our security was a priority they would take the muggers off the streets and stamp out (primarily drug-related) burglary and car theft.

"Security" only matters when it helps Israel, or means BILLIONS given to the spooks or to big businesses for useless ID card schemes.

Any idea that our government, our leaders, our politicians give two figs about us is an absolute farce!

Whether we face wage cuts, a freezing winter or crime on the streets: the politicians DO NOT CARE!

In the 40s we were promised a "land fit for heroes."

Just how long do we have to wait?

Had Enough of Zionists, Faggots, Race-Mixers and Pseudo-Reds?

Join Us and Defend Nationalism

Numerous people have been in touch to ask us to start some sort of membership structure to enable nationalists to "belong" to a structure that defends nationalism, promotes Distributism, opposes Zionism and takes a strong line on morality and defending the family.

Whilst we will never be a "political party," because we feel that the political process is too wedded to Freemasonry and betrayal - as evidenced by the betrayal of the BNP who have garnered the merest scraps from the table - we hope, that by bringing in fellow nationalists and providing a truly anti-Capitalist and anti-Communist platform, to solidify those patriots who, at the moment are floating around or who are members of groups they are not 100% comfortable with.

Membership will be open to Comrades wherever they are, so FC supporters in the UK, Ireland, Europe, North America and elsewhere will be able to join and become a part of the "FC Family" of nationalists.

We will take as out starting point the Statement of Principles as issued by the International Third Position back in 1989/1990 which have borne the test of time and, unlike the weasel-word manifestos of Masonic-parties, have proved that Truth is irrefutable and immovable when faced with the assaults of the (im)moral relativism of the Masons, Zionists and Reds.

We'll post more news on this in the coming days. In the meantime those who wish to be involved should feel free to get in touch, any any input etc. will be gratefully received.

We are already in touch with disparate nationalists who are eager to be active, and eager to save the good name of nationalism. Together we can raise the banner of nationalism and defend it from the degenerates, sell-outs and weirdos who have done so much damage to it over the years.

If not us: who?

If not now: when?


Link:
The Statement of Principles

Slavery & White Guilt: Concocted PC Nonsense

I found a great quote yesterday from GK Chesterton about slavery in England.

Right: White slaves. Airbrushed from history lessons.

I shall endeavour to type it up as the Quote of the Week though it's slightly longer than our usual offerings.

It got me to thinking. Of course many of you will know of Michael Hoffman's great book 'They Were White and They Were Slaves' which sought to debunk much of the myth surrounding "White Guilt" re. slavery.

A friend of mine went to a Nation of Islam bookshop in London a few years back. Remember them? Farrakhan and Co were once the apple of Nick Griffin's eye. How times change!

Anyway, in the bookshop he found an interesting book on slavery (the title escapes me) which detailed the lead role of "the 13th Tribe" in slavery of coloureds to the Americas.

All these threads, coupled with the fact that most slavery in Europe was abolished thanks to an army of those who stood up for the Common Good (more on that in GKC's quote...) and that in Medieval and post-Medieval Europe most slavery was the result of Moorish/Turkish pirates taking slaves from the European coast (even as far as Britain and Ireland) and we have the basis of an interesting study that could educate our younger generations.

Of course we could also ask if slaves picking cotton can also be compared to our own people forced into slave-like conditions, even the very young, earning barely enough for food and rent: the former usually over-charged and shoddy quality, the latter at the whim of hideous landlords which crammed families into rooms and cellars in hovels and slums.

White Guilt is a misnomer. It's like blaming a housing estate in Durham for profiteering from the British Empire's wars in India or the Opium Trade running out of China.

We have nothing to be guilty for, unless it was refusing to rise up against the Capitalist overlords.

Capitalist Guilt - now there's an oxymoron. Can you imagine any of the City of London bonus-grabbing, cocaine-snorting, Porsche-driving wide boys feeling guilty? I mean ever?

As long as it makes a profit say the slave-masters, the bankers, the speculators and the financiers. Anything else comes a distant second.

Link:
Hoffman debunks Amazing Grace film on White slavery

Boom & Bust, Crime & Statistics: Cause & Effect?

We often hear that things are cyclic.

The classic of course is the "boom and bust" of Capitalist economics.

Right: The financiers are the cowboys of this Wild West ghost town, aka UK plc.

It may not surprise you to read that I subscribe to the ideals and arguments of the Distributists, and therefore it is my understanding that much of this "boom and bust" is down to debt and the over-reliance of usury and building up 'debt bubbles' in order for bankers and big businessmen to amass ever greater profits year on year.

It's not a subject I've ever looked into, and I'm sure a better educated FC reader will set me right on this, but before the advent of Capitalism at (let's be generous) the Industrial Revolution (though some might argue it goes back to the land enclosures and even the land-grab of the reformation) were there "boom and busts?"

I recall reading somewhere that England was inflation free for 800 years, i.e. a penny was worth a penny was worth a penny for generations.

Can anyone over the age of 30 believe that - with £10 not stretching as far as it used to. Certainly anyone over the age of 60 could tell you what £10 used to be worth.

But I digress. Let's get back to the cycles we face (no Mr Cameron, not the ones going the wrong way up one way streets in London!).

Those of us who question the (media) accepted theory (it is just that!) of global warming often hear from 'sceptics' about cycles of warming and cooling (including the famous Medieval Warm Period).

Some even say that the "holocaust" is yet another in a long line of horror stories concocted by a certain kind of people to forward their agenda. An obvious historical comparison can be drawn with the Spanish Inquisition which was painted as the holocaust of its day (mostly via printing presses in Holland owned by certain people) on purely concocted horror stories and the equivalent of penny dreadful novels.

I'm sure we can all think of other examples.

I had a friend in the 80s (I'll mention no names to spare his blushes) who took to wearing flared trousers as was the trend of a particular time: despite the shock waves still rebounding from the 1970s! No matter what horrors this "credit crunch" or recession bring, nothing can compare to the sheer terror of those flares!

Left: Not quite the flares in question, but you can still sense the fear they induced!

Now you may wonder what all this is about. Yes, I know, I'm getting to the point!

I have spotted a new cyclic event that I think has missed most people. It has happened on and off for the last 20 or so years, give or take a few, and it is so patently obvious that when I thought about it, it struck me that the media not only covers it up, but actively partakes in its continued occurrence.

Like so many of these cyclic events (Usury-created bust, global warming, holocaust-style horror stories, etc.) these are akin to the Emperors New Clothes with a veil of cowardice descending over the mass of the population - and certainly over the professional classes who fear to speak out in case they face media approbation and lose their jobs.

I have noticed this before, but it was thrown into stark contrast this very week after a series of scandalous events which "shocked" the population (via the media) and which were followed by a 'shocking' report which caused great unease to many, especially the professional classes (again, via the media).

You don't have to have a great memory to recall the events of the last few days and weeks with the various stabbings and murders on the streets of England, and more specifically London. These were reported in the same way that the plethora of shootings and gun-related murders just a year or so before, again in "inner city" areas of our most multi-cultural cities.

So what is it that makes these terrible cluster of events so cyclic? What (if you'll pardon the analogy) are the 'busts' to these awful 'booms?'

Well it goes something like this:

• 1. Street crime is out of control, centred around mugging/drugs/guns/knives [please delete as appropriate].
• 2. People are shocked and horrified and the many victims provide the "excuse" needed to allow (!) the police to patrol the areas involved.
• 3. The police try and prevent these crimes by searching potential criminals.
• 4. Figures are released to show that most of those searched are non-White.
• 5. Politicians and pressure groups are shocked and horrified and the many "victims" (of police procedures) provide the "excuse" needed to stop the police patrolling the areas involved.
• 6. Go back to Point 1.

Am I the only one to spot the ridiculous nature of this cycle?

And as I leave that thought with you I will ask you just one more question. If the powers-that-be are allowed to give us the racial statistics for stop-and-search why won't they release the racial statistics for street crimes, especially in London?

Is one more acceptable to politicians and the media than the other?

What are they afraid of?

FC Poll Result on Fuel Prices

An interesting poll this week.

Is the runaway price of oil down to:

"Peak Oil" i.e supplies running out.	1 (5%)
Speculation by Financiers	12 (66%)
Supply and demand (esp India and China)	2 (11%)
None of the above.	3 (16%)

The majority view is my own, i.e. that financiers and speculators have done much to create this situation; their own greed outweighing any sense of duty to the common good - 'twas ever thus!

For those who voted "None of the above" perhaps you could write your ideas in the feedback section.

Other ideas, anecdotes, evidence etc. appreciated.

Returning Poles

According to the BBC around half of the East Europeans who migrated to Britain since the enlargement of the EU have returned or moved on...

Some businesses, hotels, fruit growers etc. are getting worried, because they can't get dole bums to work and they still want people who will tolerate hard work and low wages.

Meanwhile all those who've cried crocodile tears when parts of our inner cities became White again, and used the Poles (etc.) as a politically correct way to moan about immigration will have to look over the situation again.

The Poles came here. Worked hard. Now they appear to be returning.

If only the millions of Asians and Afro-Caribbeans would do likewise...

Yet to the pc brigade, the Neo Cons and many others the non-Whites are "British" whilst our White European cousins are "immigrants."

Poles, Italians, Lithuanians and others came here before and after WW2. They settled, married, and became good citizens.

What's the difference? It's about the word they all dread to mention: RACE.