Jacqui Smith, Porno-Gate & Yet More Fiddling (Sorry!)

There is little worse for a politician to be caught in flagrante delicto, red handed, pants down, in the act of Ugandan discussions as it were.

Right: The boss of the police throughout the UK is ostensibly breaking the law by fiddling her expenses, and now we find out that "Mr Smith" is fiddling too, in his own squalid style.

The image of David Mellor partaking in carnal knowledge wearing his Chelsea shirt had millions reaching for the sick bucket. They didn't know that the whole story was revenge for Mellor's outspoken attack on Israel some months before.

But there's the lesson. If they cannot bribe or coerce you onto their side, they will ruin you, given half the chance.

In By Way of Deception the ex-Mossad man Viktor Ostrovsky makes it clear that greed, pride and sex are the main ways of blackmailing, winning-over or destroying the enemies of Zionism. Read the book. It's there in black and white.

Now imagine there's a politician who isn't greedy, mad for power, an egotist or a sexual deviant.

Can you think of any? You can probably count them on one hand.

That is why there will never be realistic change in this country. They are bribed via Union or banking sinecures, or they are silenced by the Party System with its handouts from the offices of the Party Whips. Their egos are massaged by a fawning Zionist media until they have overplayed their usefulness. Any who buck the trend will have the minutiae of their private lives trawled through and if there's nowt there they will be set-up a la Mr. Mellor.
On top of all this we have the period at the end of any government when they seem to go into a suicidal free-fall.

We saw it with the Tories and now we see it under Nu-Labour. Eventually we'll see it with "Call Me Dave" Cameron's Nu-Tories as sure as eggs is eggs.

Then there'll be a revamped Labour Party ready to step into the breach, and so the whole Masonic see-saw politics (Left, Right, Left, Right) will continue ad nauseum and the media will play their part.

What we are seeing now with government ministers fiddling their expenses is just part of this Götterdämmerung of Nu-Labour as the Masonic snake sheds one layer of skin for a new one, so the sheople think it is all shiny and new, and a changed animal.

We, the astute thinkers that we are dear reader, know that this is all show of course. The backers remain the same. Powerful lobbies like the Rothschilds, the Bilderbergers and others remain pulling the strings of their media, banking, big business, military and political marionettes.

Yes, it's embarrassing for the politicos to be caught in flagrante delicto whichever hue they are. How much more embarrassing for a Nu Labour wymmun to be caught with her husband (different surname, natch!) and her parliamentary advisor (i.e. they are one and the same person - she obviously believes in nepotism as well as flagrant thieving from the public purse) fiddling (zoiks!) by claiming porno films on her parliamentary expenses...

What will she tell the NuLabour sisters about her hubby (the one with the different name living in her "second home" with their children as she lives in their "main home" - the broom cupboard at her sister's house) watching porno movies at the public expense?

She won't be worried about the money. She won't really care what her husband gets up to at their "second home" when she's telling us that Al Qaeda poses more of a threat than the guns and drugs gangs that infest our cities that have become Third World hunting grounds.

After all, this is the woman behind the whole 'safe kebab' fiasco who tried to tell us how safe it was to walk the coloured-dominant streets of London at night (neglecting to mention she had bodyguards... and... erm... it was the afternoon!).

This is a woman with no shame, content to fiddle expenses (illegal and a sackable offence in the real world), adept at lying to cover her butt and all the time fiddling (quite literally) while our Rome burns.

No, what the public thinks has never mattered, a new "red terror alert" will be designed to change the headlines. "Ms." Smith will only care that her image is now tarnished by Porno-Gate amongst the NuLabour apparatchiks and all hey wymmins-rights comrades.

For when rent-a-snob Tories turn up at the next Nu-Lab shindig carrying "Sponsored by Kleenex" banners it will show that the Nu-Lab hierarchy don't even believe in their own feminist agenda, something at the heart of their social-control agenda.

As the NuLab government seek to foist prime time TV ads for condoms (which don't stop pregnancies, HIV or STDs and promote promiscuity) and "pregnancy advisory services" (i.e. businesses/charities that profit from abortion referrals) how comforting to know that they treat us to their degenerate social experiments whilst they sit at home forking (I said forking!) out money to big businesses to watch degenerate porn (remember most porno is traced back to Talmudic-owned businesses).

It is yet another case of "do what we say not what we do."

Oh yes!

"We must all tighten our belts" say the government minister whilst fiddling expenses, giving the green light to banksters bonuses and turning a blind eye to boardroom mega-wage packets.

"Security is our first priority" says the government minister whilst our streets are prowled by muggers and drugs gangs.

"British jobs for British workers" says the government minister (er... PM!) whilst they have no intention of doing that (which would be illegal under EU laws anyway!).

But (as Eurosceptic Daniel Hannan MEP might say) they know and we know and they know that we know that all this is bunkum, sound bytes fed to the media for an evening's headlines in our 24 hour media world.

The new aspect of this kerfuffle is that it will upset the feministas in NuLab more than any lies, dodgy money and even criminal connections (these are people who brought Lord "Hello Russian Sailor" Mandelson back into government for goodness sake!).

The cat is out of the bag (and that's not a euphemism for "Mr.Smith's" nocturnal proclivities) that when it comes to their "Core values" (now, now, stop laughing!) these politicos don't even believe in them!

We all know they jettisoned Socialism years ago, just like the Tories jettisoned any positive values embedded in conservatism, and the Lib Dems jettisoned any remnant of positive values in liberalism when they signed up to EU neo-Stalinism).

This is akin to a public acknowledgement that the insides of NuLab are a rotten, festering mess. Will the NuLab sisters ever forgive "Ms." Smith? Let's hope not.


Links:
Smith's "Dirty Bomb alert" Neo Con Cobblers
Richard Timney ("Mr Smith") Says Sorry for Porno-Gate

Abu Qatada Ruling Gets Jaqcui Smith in a Tizzy

Our Home Secretary is reportedly hopping mad that Abu Qatada ("Mad Mullah" - copyright The Sun) has had a payout of £2500 because British laws assailed his human rights.

Right: Abu Qatada, guilty of having an unruly beard. Like Jaqcui Smith he has been fiddling the system in order to claim housing expenses and suchlike.

There are a number of issues that Nationalists should dwell on here.

It is wrong for people to be locked up without trial, whoever they are. After all the biggest criminals in the eyes of the NWO are "holocaust deniers" and their ilk. We need to man the barricades (of the law) against the day when the NWO think they can move against patriots.

People like Qatada should be turned back at the border, and in that respect this issue would never have arisen. It shouldn't be a "human right" for people to cross the globe to find 'safety' when they could just cross a border. It stinks of the handout/benefit beacon that calls to migrants: the "safety net" for our working men has become a honey pot for the flotsam and jetsom of the world!

But d'you know the real reason why Jaqcui Smith is hopping mad?

It's a chunk of money no longer available to her by fiddling her housing expenses!

Poor (!) Jaqcui.

The less the exchequer can claw in through taxes, thanks to her government being in the pocket of bankrupt bankers, the less money there is in the trough (or so you'd think).

Not that it doesn't stop the likes of Abu and Jaqcui from milking the system.

All "legally" of course!

Independence Day (or Blofeld, Doylies & Goldfish)

Do politicians believe their own spin?

Right: Peter "I deeply regret... getting caught" Hain

I believe they do. Some may start all fresh-faced and (dare I say?) honest in their intentions; but they soon fall into line.

Most become party automatons parroting the party-line.

How many times did we hear them justifying the dodgy dossier? How many times have we heard them cover-up for their colleagues' sleaze - e.g. Peter Hain's dodgy money and a barely existent "think tank."

They wonder why politicians are not trusted in a week when the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, tried to say London at night was "safe" when it transpired her spun 'night time trip to a kebab shop' took place at 7pm with a bodyguard in tow!

So it was earlier in the week I tuned into possibly one of the least watched TV stations around: BBC Parliament.

I was pottering at work and I'd heard Hague's speech on the second reading of the EU Constitution (or whatever they've decided to mislabel it as these days) was a belter... as it happens work intervened and I didn't get that far, though I'll try and see it again.

Thus it was I put the BBC Parliament channel on my pc and started doing the job I had lined up. The computer went on and on with various politicians coming and going in the background as I beavered away earning my daily crust (pausing only to mop the sweat from my brow with a spotted hanky).

Cor, these crosswords in The Sun get harder by the day don't they???

Oh tush, dear reader. I'm joking of course. Ne'er a Murdoch rag passes our threshold or any office-space of mine, bar some dire need or emergency (or perchance a copy left on a train, ever seeking to save a penny...)!

As I worked something was said that had me scooting across the room (self-propelling my wheeled chair like a James Bond villain).

Right: Des Browne says "believe me - I'm an expert."

It was the Defence Questions session and the Defence Secretary Des Browne was fielding questions from various MPs: and one had just fired a veritable stinger missile at the man in the post who has to defend our involvement in Zionist wars.

Norman Baker (for it was he) had asked Browne why a certain RAF base was still listed and labeled as an RAF base when there are no RAF personnel there.

Baker, the MP for Lewes (whom, I seem to remember is quite the investigative soul on the matter of the death of Dr David Kelly), suggested that the base be called what it is: a United States base.

Left: Blofeld can't believe his ears! "What a Zionist sonuvabitch!"

The wheels on my chair were glowing red hot, such was the friction involved as I sped twixt work and the pc (sinister white cat jettisoned en route). I rewound the footage and listened carefully.

Yes, it seems that as well as the myriad of US bases such as Mildenhall and the vast acreage of supersize golf balls (sorry, my James Bondesque persona isn't holding up to public scrutiny is it?) spying on all of us from North Yorkshire - which even have the power to knock out the electrics of cars on roads in the area - we also have "British" military bases that are actually American ones.

I wondered what Americans might make of this.

Would they like British Army or RAF bases dotted across America? Would they like British personnel running alleged "American" bases?

Might they wonder what 1776 had been all about?

As I've said before (about the Arabs, but it runs just as well for us as Europeans) it seems that we need to enact our own version of the Monroe Doctrine that the Americans put so much stall by (it stops foreign powers getting involved militarily in the Americas which the USA sees as it its own domain); but then they were also the days when most Americans believed in non-intervention.

These kinds of bases on our soil (we're lucky we don't have Guantanamo like Cuba!) are an overhang from WW2, but as we've just finished paying the billions of WW2 debt to America, at what interest rate the good Lord alone knows (with friends like these...), it's about time the Americans got their troops the hell off our soil (to use Hollywood movie language).

Left: Des Browne's doyley?

All this was going through my mind and I was in dire need to run off and find someone to rant at (computer screens just don't respond to a rant like a fellow human, and anyway, the cat had scarpered!) when Mr. Browne delivered a particularly large, intricate, chintzy, lacey, doyley to act as the centrepiece to his table of a response (in that he tried to make it well-polished and presentable, but it was distinctly wobbly with a touch of woodworm).

He claimed that America was a great ally of ours.

Hmmm. OK. Well let's say that's true - it still doesn't excuse the foreign military bases that we see dotted around our countryside.

France is our ally. So is Germany. Italy too.

Hey! Perhaps the idea is to let all our allies to have military bases in the UK? How inclusive! How so very, very "modern!"

Browne (alas) continued. He next made such a preposterous statement that it made the Dodgy Dossier look like a well researched work of sober, genuine probity.

He claimed that America was a good ally because they were sending more troops to Afghanistan in support of our troops.

Zoiks!

I watched carefully to see if Browne blushed - but not a jot of it. He was bold as brass (no not bald as a brass, that's more to do with Wayne Rooney's octogenarian peccadilloes).

Did he just say that? Does he believe what he just said.

Having already asked his question the camera didn't go back to the Lib Dem MP for Lewes for his reaction, but his eyes must have been on stalks!

Ssssh. What's that whirring sound?

It must be Dr David Kelly spinning in his grave...

According to our Defence Secretary - the expert in our government, in charge of our armed forces - the Americans are great friends because they're sending more troops to help our troops.

What!?!?

Is he mad?

Does he have the memory of a goldfish?

Has he lost the plot?

Does he have the memory of a goldfish?

Is he believing his own spin?

Does he have the memory of a goldfish? (OK, sorry - it wasn't funny the first time!).

This is a government that has sent our armed forces to fight - and die - in Zionist wars that had (and have) nothing to do with our country!

America started these wars and our government decided to act like a pet poodle and follow on its coattails. Worse still, our government lied, spun and covered-up for the American Neo-Con regime and the Israeli Lobby in order to bring these wars about (in the shadow of a highly questionable stage-managed event known as '911').

Now our Defence Secretary (surely Minister of War?) is trying to tell us why we should be grateful to the Americans, and accept the preponderance of their military bases here, because they are sending in troops to support our troops, which were sent in to support their troops (are you following this?).

I started off by asking if politicians believe their own spin.

Des Browne must believe his own spin because otherwise there is no way that he could spout such bare-faced chutzpah (and I use the Kosher term advisedly) to be recorded in Hansard for posterity.

Lies, Damn Lies and the Home Secretary

Some people say you can tell when a politician's lying: his lips move.

Right: Jacqui Smith. Spin is alive and well in New Labour.

Perhaps that's a little disingenuous, for we can all think of individual politicians who stand out from the crowd, regardless of affiliations.

Personally speaking the likes of Ann Widdicombe, Robin Cook and even George Galloway have given glimpses of bravery, speaking out, going against the grain.

Generally speaking though these glimpses of politicians saying and (far more importantly!) doing something right, are few and far between.

Over the last few days I've witnessed our illustrious Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, waxing lyrically about street crime and youth crime.

You see, our dear Home Secretary, can prove that street crime, violent assaults etc. are down.

Yes, we're dealing with official statistics and if there is anything that can ever be diametrically opposed to the truth it is surely official statistics.

Doesn't the saying go 'there are lies, damn lies and statistics?'

Anyone who's seen the old 70s sitcom Yes Minister knows what we are dealing with here as civil servants and government officials (Sir Humphrey & Co) twist and tweak the recording rules and more, to make the "official figures" look even better.

Remember when the government handed out work permits to asylum seekers? Overnight they were no longer officially "asylum seekers" - though the same flotsam and jetsam of Asian and Africa flooded in (fleeing for their lives, through the safe countries of mainland Europe, to the honey pot of the UK with its housing benefit, NHS etc.)

We were then told how the government has succeeded in stemming the flood of asylum seekers, and we had less to worry about apropos large scale coloured immigration (closed doors, horse bolted etc.).

Of course the same non-European people were flooding in, but the Sir Humphreys had tweaked the rules and all of a sudden there was "no asylum seeking problem."

I haven't yet mentioned this government's decision to downgrade cannabis with the result that a drug which is causing serious health issues - with criminal repercussions - is now widely perceived in the criminal classes as something to be enjoyed with great regularity.

Of course the other side to this decision to downgrade cannabis (made by a government minister whose own son was later found in possession of... cannabis) was that the police could dismiss those found with cannabis on them with a 'ticking off' and a "be on your way sonny" pep talk. No paperwork. No official report.

Left: A government advisor perhaps?

No doubt the official figures showed that illegal drug possession was down! Another victory... not for law and order, not for common sense, but for obfuscation and spin.

And so let us turn to Jaqcui Smith, our beloved Home Secretary (for American readers - I'm being ironic).

Right through the tail end of this week she kept assuring various audiences that the official statistics for violent crime were down.

So what did we witness this weekend? What proof of this wonderful nation in which crime is becoming a thing of the past, in which (according to Ms. Smith on the BBC's Andrew Marr show) women are perfectly safe to walk in London alone at night?

Midnight picnics for teens on Hampstead Heath? Kids with ipods or businessmen with laptops strolling through Hackney or Tottenham after 10pm? Or perhaps just elderly Englishmen free to wander through any part of Oldham or Blackburn? Neighbours leaving their front doors open whilst they pop into each others houses for tea and cake? Bicycles left just lightly chained to railings overnight to be reclaimed the next morning?

Not quite.

This country in which street crime is rapidly a thing of the past - if Ms. Smith is to be believed - is about to see airport-style walk-through metal detectors used in "inner city" (trans: multi-racial) schools.

Not Brixton night clubs. Schools.

S - C - H - O - O - L - S.

So Jacqui Smith would have us believe that all is well because the official figures say things are getting better (might it not be that people give up reporting common assaults?) yet we have machines designed to keep knives (and guns) out of our schools.

Thank God things are so rosy! Thank God this government has done such a good job!

In a country where even burglaries are no longer routinely investigated (yes, you too could just get a call from the police allocating you a crime number for insurance purposes) Ms. Smith and her boss Gordon Brown (busy hobnobbing the Communists in China) will keep telling you that all is well.

They are lying. Can't you tell? Their lips are moving...