 |
| Zionbot 4.0 |
 |
| Druggie, traitor and weirdo |
Mossad and CIA active in Syria:
Tip of my deerstalker to Maurice Pinay Blog
I like reading Peter Hitchens column in the Mail on Sunday. He isn't always right, but he's about as close as it gets in the mainstream media. He loathes the Marxist and PC left, but he is equally as angry about the hand-wringing or Big Business right.
In today's column he all but says Osama Bin Laden wasn't behind the Twin Towers. There is only one way we can follow that. That Osama was a patsy - a willing put-up baddie by the CIA/Mossad etc. Or he was willing to take on that mantle to build his org into the No. 1 Muslim terror group (a useful idiot).
Either way he did what the Neo Cons, the NWO, the Zionists wanted.
Remember who the only people in New York celebrating were: the group of Israeli special forces with their rental van, later stopped and arrested after sniffer dogs detecting explosives - and later released quietly by George Dubya.
It all stinks to high heaven.
What else could the Zionists want but a perfect bogeyman to yell "it was us?"
Hitchens gets it wrong when he blames the Palestinians for cheering. After all, the Americans had blocked umpteen UN Resolutions against Israel which resulting in many tens of thousands of Palestinians dying - not to mention those tortured, maimed etc.
The Americans think their 3000 odd victims of 911 is a watershed. Not for the Palestinians it wasn't. They had lost that many people many times over to State sponsored terror, only for the American government to block any UN Resolutions. They also are not blind to the fact that much of the weaponry was bought with US tax-payers funds, poured into Israel.
Reverse those facts and don't you think the Americans would cheer a strike on Palestine? They sure cheered when the CIA bogeyman was (allegedly!) taken-out...
Our problem in the West is thinking that "our" victims of terror (even if we accept the terror is Islamic and not Zionist) are worth more to us, than the dead Arabs slaughtered by Zionist terror mean to the Arabs.
If our people were murdered, tortured, expelled, imprisoned in concentration camps, denied water etc. as much as the Palestinians do you not think we would rise up against our oppressors?
When we hear of Churchill's "stay behind" Resistance Fighters in secret hide-outs, armed to take out German invaders; even after a surrender -making such Resistance illegal under the Geneva Convention: would most people consider such people terrorists? Or freedom fighters?
So how do you think most Arabs look on those who struggle against a Zionist machine that has murdered hundreds of thousands, with the financial, material and political backing of America, the last Super-power?
Hitchens thinks 911 can be traced back to Palestine in that the Muslim perpetrators urged the end of injustice to the Palestinians. I think it can indeed be traced back to Palestine -- because prior to 911 Bush had said he wanted to be less involved in foreign wars (can you imagine?) and the Middle East. He was all but saying he was going to cut Israel loose.
Join the dots folks:
So many people...
So much information...
All the property of Face Book.
All run by...?
Who is watching what you do, who you communicate with, your private messages?
Those who are legible for Israeli citizenship (like the Face Book founder) have a habit of allowing Israel "back doors" for their software.
Robert Maxwell (Jan Ludwig Koch) made multi-millions selling such software, for defence and security agencies, to Communist and Arab countries and across America.
Do not think the Israeli secret services would not be interested!
Following our last article on Fukushima and Stuxnet, an FC supporter sent us this info:
Absolutely!
...it was a great article on the Zionist role in Fukushima.
Israel introduced the Stuxnet virus into Iran's nuclear energy plants last year, as you will be aware. The Jerusalem Post reported on the 30th December 2010 that the British State was also involved with Mossad in attempting to sabotage Iran's nuclear programme. This sabotage included not only Stuxnet, but also the assassination of 5 Iranian nuclear scientists and an explosion which killed 18 Iranian technicians.
In regard to Fukushima, Haaretz is now reporting that it was the Israeli security firm Magna that was providing “security” for the plant prior to the incident. Magna is based in Dimona, the very site where Israel carried out the testing on the Stuxnet virus.
This is the reality of Zionist terror; a terror which sees the goyim of Japan as expendable, along with the million dead Iraqis and the unknown number of dead in Afghanistan, Libya, Palestine and across the world.
It rather puts the “threat” of the burqa into perspective, don’t you think?
Panorama, Newsnight and the entire BBC machinery has been acting as the mouth of the Libyan rebels. Every (uncensored) report from Tripoli almost invariably has the words "cannot be independently verified" tagged on, whereas reports from rebel areas (even tenuous, speculative ones, have no such tag line).
On last night's Newsnight a spokesman for the Libyan rebels all but called for US/NATO military action, on their side of course, and if civilians died - so be it, if it helped them win their civil war, their armed insurrection.
Thus we see the "humanitarian" cloak used (as Farrakhan said) to disguise their nefarious aims, is quickly tossed aside when it comes to killing civilians loyal to the Libyan government or in their areas!
Of course the elephant in the room is that armed rebels in civilian clothing are "civilians" too - even though they are in armed insurrection, no doubt helped by the CIA/Mossad.
So, as very few British MPs and media voices have the courage to state, we are joining a Civil War on one side. The crimes of that side will be airbrushed and the crimes of the other side (if you'll pardon the pun) will be blown out of all proportion.
'Mission Creep' is already taking place. There's talk of arresting Gaddafi, "taking out" Gaddafi, assaulting towns held by the Libyan government and their supporters (with how many civilian victims?) to help the rebels...
Killing innocents comes easy to the Zionists, and always will to achieve their ends. They are just numbers.
Human lives, civilian deaths, collateral damage -- however you want to label murder of innocents -- only matter when the Zionists want in somewhere. Then civilians murders are a crime against humanity. Oh the tears flow!
Yet when hundreds of thousands die in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza - not to mention the million or so dead in Rwanda - it matters not a jot to the Zionists. Indeed, in some (most!) cases they are the ones doing the indiscriminate murder.
When Israel invaded Lebanon (a sovereign nation) many innocents died and UN checkpoints were attacked. There was no UN Resolution, no no-fly zone, no talk of war crimes.
When Gaza had democracy and voted in Hamas (as was their right), Israel enacted an illegal blockade. Where then was the humanitarian concern of the Americans?
Watch the following video. It shows the Americans in action, committing a war crime. Killing civilians. The man who leaked this video is being abused in an American military stockade.
Where is America's love of freedom, that they wanted this video hushed up?
What happened in Iraq could well happen in Libya if the various War Hawks, Neo Cons and Zionists have their way (including the British government's Defence Secretary). It's what the 'rebels' (who are leading the BBC by the nose, so must be part of a MI6 agenda) want, in order to get their way, and change the government of Libya by hook or by crook.
The talk of humanitarian aims, helping civilians etc. is all hogwash.
Watch the video from Iraq. A man walking down the street with a weapon (lets call him a "rebel") walks into a building. The American gunship then gets the all-clear from their own Command to attack the building, to blow it up (with everyone inside it).
If the rebel were a Libyan rebel and the helicopter were a Libyan government one, this would be shown on Newsnight as proof of war crimes, and as an excuse to get NATO troops on the ground to protect civilians (even the ones carrying weapons).
Why therefore, is it not a criminal act when the Americans do it? Because they are following Zionist war aims? Because they can veto the UN Security Council?
Is this any way to get neutral unbiased justice in the world? Or a neutral unbiased military response backed by the UN?
If NATO/US forces get even more embroiled in Libya, we will see more of this kind of action, more civilian deaths, the Civil War will escalate.
All to a back-drop of billions spent on weaponry at a time when all the Western states are close to bust and poverty in America, for example, is rampant! Kerching.
Yet because that seems to be a Zionist goal, we are all meant to sit back and clap politely when a Libyan rebel leader calls for more "collateral damage" to achieve his aims. Doesn't it kind of remind you of the Iraqi rebel nutters who were calling for war and promising they'd find the sites of the WMDs? Beware war propaganda using useful idiots.
Welcome to the New World Order. Killing is their business, and business is good.
22nd March, 2011
Editor, Today, BBC Radio 4, London
Dear Sir
Gaddafi may be mad at what is happening to his beloved country but he is not mad psychologically. He wrote the Third Universal Theory of politics which outlines the flaws in representative democracy – under-representation (only a quarter to a third of people are usually represented by the Party taking power), manipulation of policy by donors and powerful elites etc. and supervision of the law-makers by themselves. We could add; indulging in wars that are not in any manifesto, palpably illegal and likely to incite retribution rather than ‘destroy’ terrorists.
Generally known as his Green Book, it suggests a solution is for everyone to represent themselves. He set up People’s Congresses, National, Regional and Local, so that individuals could voice their concerns and proposals for policy. I have seen them in operation, it is a breath of fresh air. It is also a delicate experiment, especially in a nation of diverse tribal interests. But it kept the peace for 40-odd years. It also kept people’s minds active where our democracy numbs them by distancing people from government. So they are alert to foreign manipulation where we are blissfully ignorant of it.
So Gaddafi was not mad or a dictator when he gave everyone the right to participate in policy. Would we had it here!
He was not mad when he demanded fair price for Libyan oil in 1969.
He was not mad when he rightly criticized the UN last year for being run by a Security Council which did not represent the developing world.
He was not mad when he criticized the US for manipulating the Security Council by vetoing any motions it did not like, especially those condemning Israeli atrocities against Palestinians.
He was not mad when he pointed out that 80% of global wealth was in the hands of about 400 families.
He was not mad when he criticized Israel for bombing innocent civilians in Gaza without being sanctioned by the Security Council.
And he was not mad or a dictator when he asked the rioters, “Do you want to be occupied by America?” and advised them to seek out traitors and defend themselves.
In all these cases he was mad enough to expose the really mad megalomaniacs who control most of the world using violence, fraud and deception. Indeed, his exposure of them is likely to account for the second disproportionate and inhuman bombardment of his country.
Incidentally, the first bombing raid in 1986, we now know, was predicated on false information about so-called terrorist plots by Libya. These were actually invented by Mossad. Psychological Warfare Department (LAP) of Mossad was behind the defamation of Ghaddafi. Victor Ostrovsky, ex-Mossad officer, details how Mossad tricked the ‘west’ (US, UK et al.) into bombing Libya in 1986 using 'Operation Trojan', in his ‘The Other Side of Deception' (p113-7). Trojan was a re-broadcasting device planted in Tripoli to put out false messages as if Col. Ghaddafi was planning terrorist attacks. An IDF ship offshore, beamed the coded messages into his HQ from which they were re-broadcast, giving the impression they were coming from Tripoli. So when the US and UK surveillance teams picked them up they believed they were genuine Libyan plots. Mossad was able to 'confirm' the reports! The bombing raid got Thatcher and Regan to commit war crimes by killing innocent people including Ghaddafi’s adopted daughter.
I would be grateful if you could salvage the BBC’s credibility for broadcasting the truth rather than parroting the disinformation by enemies of the people, by at least airing this side of the story, preferably mounting a discussion of it. Otherwise, our brave pilots and possibly the Prime Minister himself may be drifting into a bloody conflict in which they could be found guilty of War Crime. For, despite UN Resolutions 1970 & 1973, this war is not under UN control which the Charter stipulates, nor has the UN called on the parties to settle their dispute first (Chapter VI Art.33), required before action under Chapter VII when there is no threat to international peace and there is no authority to depose or murder the Head of State. So this is an unlawful interference in the domestic jurisdiction of a sovereign state, prohibited under Chapter I (Art.2(7)). Thus, sending in cruise missiles with their notorious inaccuracy and inevitable death to anyone near them, could be a War Crime.
So it is not Gaddafi who is mad, but our Leader and his entourage, falling for an irrational plot to unseat a falsely demonised ‘dictator’ whose only crime is to threaten and punish those who de-stabilize the country for no discernible benefit except possibly, to themselves. The dissidents over here have a different agenda: they can stay as long as they claim to be persecuted if they go home, so they have to propagate stories about torture and death.
Finally, Gaddafi is not the ‘dictator’ Mossad would like you to believe. He is not even the ‘President’ having retired as ‘Leader’ in 1996 and adopted the title ‘Father of the Revolution’. But he is so popular and revered by most of the population, that he is still given the authority to speak for his nation, just as the Queen might do if she was allowed to.
Is there any chance you might try to balance the demonization with some facts about his brave attempts to give power to the people and hold a disparate nation together? I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
Dr James B Thring (founder Ministry of Peace & Legal Action Against War)
With thanks to NW Nationalists
Successive governments of every hue have told us that the protection of our citizens is number one priority.
That is why, we are informed, that it was so vital that we take part in the newspeak "War on Terror."
Right: "Can we watch multi-culti, pro-homosexual Eastenders after the news Dad?"
Never mind that it could be argued that our taking on the Israeli-American foreign policy puts more of our people (here and especially overseas) in peril, let us look more closely at who our people need protection from.
1. Who is behind the terror attacks?
There is eye-witness evidence that Israeli Mossad agents brought down the twin towers and were "on the ground" in NYC when "911" took place. Eye-witnesses saw Israelis with a hire-van celebrating. The same hire-van was stopped by police whose explosive sniffer-dogs went haywire by the tunnel linking NYC with New Jersey. A story even leaked of a foiled terror attack on the NYC-NJ tunnel on the same day, before being silenced. The arrested Israelis were released without charge.
Or even without this proof, we can ask ourselves Quid Pro Quo. Who has the most to gain from "911" - a CIA established extremist Islamic group whose bases were destroyed? Or the Israeli war machine who achieved a turn-around in US policy (from non-interventionist to Neo Can war hawks) and had two anti-Israeli regimes turned to dust (not least revenge was taken out on the Scud-firing Iraq).
Ask yourself this: Who had the most to gain from the attacks and why has the evidence of Israeli involvement never been fairly discussed?
2. What kills more of our people every year?
If the duty of our government is to protect our people, why are they getting dragged (or running into!) foreign wars of a Neo-Con hawk nature when they cannot keep our own people safe on the streets of Britain?
David Cameron is showing his true Neo Con colours by urging military action against Libya. Another war for foreign interests alien to our own? Cameron is proving to be Blair mark II.
Meanwhile ask yourself this, in the last 10 years:
I have always said that the man who cannot show fidelity to his wife, cannot show fidelity to his Nation.
In other words, the man who breaks the vow he made before God (or I guess in these days, before some local council appointee) and shows no honesty in this regard and the promises he made to his wife, will just as easily betray the nationalist cause (or indeed any cause).
Right: We have enough liars, cheats and con men lauding it over us now. We shouldn't tolerate any in Nationalism.
I do not say such a thing in order to promote myself as some sort of "super husband." Far from it as Mrs. FC would be quick to point out.
I believe however that faithfulness to one's spouse is as important as the care of one's children, and the very least one should be capable of as a husband and father.
No parent would, I hope, dream of betraying the trust of their children by willingly putting them in danger. And yet it seems a growing number of 'men' see no problem in putting the very fabric of marriage in danger by cheating on their wives (and vice versa I'm sure, but let's deal with the men here).
As nationalists, as patriots, I would hope that all of us would concur that the family, that marriage, is central to the stability of the nation.
That much, surely, is glaringly obvious.
Aside from mass immigration making vast swathes of England into microcosms of Asia and Africa, with all their tribal conflicts and the societal problems that generations of offspring of mixed cultures bring, I would honestly say that the collapse in the family has played a major part in the UK's downward spiral.
Anti-social crime often stems from broken or dysfunctional 'families.' Drugs run through communities where families have broken-up and the community spirit is lost. A generation of kids grow up with no male role model, or a succession of "uncles" or step-dads.
In this situation some liberal voice - or even a well-meaning soul who has found himself in this situation through no fault of their own - will pipe up and provide the example of a 'broken' family that works well.
And I do not doubt they exist, just as there are old-fashioned families that are a train wreck. But these are the exceptions that prove the rule.
Look across Britain and you see a society where the family has all too often collapsed, and the consequences are there for all to see.
Furthermore I would argue that in the people who are chosen (by media moguls and party systems) to rule us, there is an over-riding lack of honesty.
This was seen in the recent expenses scandal -- which I still insist happened just after the banking crisis because the media were ordered by the banking masters to reek revenge on the politicos who had dared bare their teeth against the bankers.
If the banking collapse hadn't happened, the expenses scandal would have been brushed under the carpet with perhaps a handful of replaceable fall guys taking the heat for all the other money-grubbers and traitors in parliament.
As it was the banks were left reeling after the attacks on them and their practices by all and sundry and -- despite being baled out by the tax-payers taking out more usury-loans to keep them afloat -- they released their attack dogs with the full venom of the expenses scandal.
A perfect example of why money grubbers are always open to control and blackmail .
But let's get back to fidelity in marriage.
Aside from the wider societal issues which I believe every Nationalist - and certainly every Nationalist that considers himself a Christian - must concur with, I think this has grave issues for the individual Nationalist.
As surely as the politicians who 'flipped' their second homes to fiddle their expenses, the nationalist who runs after a 'piece of skirt' just because she flutters her eyelashes at him, or because he has some sort of misguided idea that he has the right to try it on regardless, is showing that he puts his own welfare and well being ahead of anything else.
Such oath breakers will have no trouble in breaking the comradeship of the cause and betraying his compatriots.
What is more obvious still is that the nationalist that cheats on his wife lays himself wide open, as per the MPs' expenses and second home scandal, to coercion, blackmail and suchlike.
Some will say that temptation comes to folk and many slip up and recover and that is perfectly true. It is human nature.
However I do believe that as Nationalists - and especially as (to coin an old phrase) as nationalist 'cadre' material - we need to be showing the example for others to follow.
It's an idea as old as the hills and has been followed the length and breadth of Europe since your daddy was knee high to a grasshopper, but it remains as valid today.
Those who stand up to defend Faith, Family, Nation must be the best examples of fidelity to all three.
To do otherwise is as deluded as someone who says that race-mixing is wrong, that immigration has been a tremendous mistake, that the millions of Third World people in the UK should be humanely resettled in their countries of origin, etc. etc. deciding that taking an African as a mate is hunkydory and fine.
Wouldn't we all decry such an action as rank hypocrisy?
Just so, dear reader, with the nationalist who betrays his wife. There can be no excuse for such shenanigans whether within the movement or outside it.
If we are, one day, to build a new society from the wreckage of the liberal experiment that is spiralling downwards, then what right have we if we are no better than the people we denounce as traitors, cheats, profiteers and charlatans?
There are enough snake oil salesmen in our society without letting the nationalist cause become dominated by them.
The man who shows no loyalty to his wife, will show no loyalty to his nation; because the man with no conscience pertaining to the one closest to him, who he promised to love for life regardless of the circumstance, will have no conscience betraying those who are faces in a room, names on a list and who live miles away.
Anyone who has read the history of Mossad knows that they gain control of enemies in three ways: flattery and unknown bribary; corruption and known bribary; sexual 'honey traps.'
If, for no other positive reason, Nationalists should demand the very highest standards from their activists and leaders.
I have always believed that, and I am yet to be proven wrong.
Last night the BBC (which we used to fondly call Blair's Bolshevik Corporation) ran a part of its series The Conspiracy Files (Series Two).
It dealt with what has annoyingly (and Americanly!?!?) been labeled "7/7" - aka the "Muslim Terror Bomb Attacks in London."
The programme dealt primarily with a video called "7/7 The Ripple Effect" which we've linked to on the next post so you can go see it yourself.
Interestingly The Ripple Effect Video (TRE) has as a main part of its thesis that BBC is used and abused by the security services to disseminate lies about 7/7 and the whole "War on Terror" debacle.
Lo and behold the BBC spends an hour attacking TRE and those who have loosely coalesced around it.
The BBC "discovered" the man behind it (who gave them that info? MI5?), a man who is now in jail in Ireland awaiting extradition.
Another "doubter/revisionist" was smeared because he wrote a piece "denying" the holohoax.
It all smells of the usual fayre dished up by the Neo-Cons, BBC, government and spooks.
They pull apart small parts of TRE whilst ignoring some key issues (not least the fact that 3 of the "suicide bombers" were reported as being shot by the spooks at Canary Wharf!!!).
Still the BBC in being forced to come to the aid of their political bosses have highlighted TRE and will have ensured that hundreds of thousands more look up the video online.
Any nationalist who thinks the spooks are not capable of setting up patsies and setting off their own explosives are at best naive.
Watch TRE (linked below) and watch the BBC's The Conspiracy Files (available on iplayer at the BBC website) and think for yourself.
The woman who seems to be the "victims' mouthpiece" who takes the official line thinks it dishonours the dead to ask questions.
This is a line that holohoax officials use.
It is a lie.
The dead are dead. If anything, asking questions and truth-seeking is to honour them because if there are lies being peddled about how and why they died that dishonours their memory!
If I was murdered and an innocent man jailed for the crime, whilst the guilty walked free I know I would want the facts looked into and the guilty found and dealt with.
We must be free to ask questions, however unpleasant, however unpalatable to the government's pet BBC.
Does the fact that the BBC knowingly and unknowingly employs criminals, paedophiles, drunkards, adulterers and those who uphold bizarre religious (or anti-religious) theories make all their news coverage untrue or unpalatable?
No.
yet we are told that TRE etc. is unpalatable because of its authors religious outlook and one of its supporter's revisionist views on history.
Thanks BBC.
You have merely confirmed that you are a government agency out to smear anything that really looks into the whys and wherefores of the NWO, just as you will not ask the questions about the banking crisis, or the Bilderbergers, who owns the media etc. etc.
It certainly makes the questions over the BBC's reporting of events in Iran fall into focus!
On the programme the BBC reporter bewails that (the "discredited") TRE is "damaging trust in the British government."
Oh boo hoo!
Where is the media outrage?
Front page "terror" stories?
Columnists talking about the evil religion of Judaism with its anti-Christian bile?
Why isn't our government talking about dual loyalty and "extremism" in some sections of "Jewish communities?"
Or assuring us that hardline Zionists "aren't real Jews because it's a religion of peace" as they do with Islam?
Where's the right-wing politicians putting out leaflets about Judeofascism and the linking it in with international drugs cartels, illegal wars, the banking crisis, etc. etc.
Why?
To ask the question is to get the answer:
Andrew Whitley is a spokesman for the UN in Palestine where he works for the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).
Right: The UN's Andrew Whitley has warned of hunger and suffering because of the 18 month Israeli blockade of Gaza and has denied that Hamas Militants were in the UN School bombed by Israel. How long before Mossad find some dirt on - or worse - silence him?
Back in April 2007 he warned of trouble ahead, because since the 2006 elections, the Gaza Strip has been under an economic blockade (an act of war in most country's books!).
Whitley painted a picture of a people under siege, and suffering like we could never believe:
“We keep (including the World Food Program) these people alive these days and the degree they have become dependent on the international community for lack of resources is troubling indeed,” Whitley said.
In other words the people of Gaza were being deliberately starved, by an Israeli blockade, because of their choice in free elections.
How would we feel if the EU blockaded our ports and stopped all imports/exports because we voted for an anti-EU government (e.g. UKIP, the BNP, or even a Eurosceptic Tory Party)?
Wouldn't we view that as a crime? An act of war even?
The Palestinians have been suffering like this for years! And where are the "democrats" in the UK to defend the rights of the Palestinians to vote in Hamas? Or to live without the collective punishment of a blockade with starvation and suffering?
Whoooosh!
That sound was the tumbleweed blowing through these here parts!
The professional political class have been condemned by their silence. Their sin of omission has ratcheted up the pressure in a powder keg situation, manouevered into place by a criminal elite in Tel Aviv and Washington DC.
As the news report below explains:
Although the Israeli Army established checkpoints in the name of security, “I would argue the means to tackle these threats…leads to a sense of nihilism, pent up anger that …brings about the results they are trying to avoid,” Whitley explained.
In other words after the forced partition of their lands, the erection of a wall to dwarf the accursed Berlin Wall, and a forced starvation and mass unemployment because of the way they chose to vote, the Palestinians now face mass murder and the illegal use of phosphorous and cluster bombs by a State that has done everything it can to ratchet up the suffering of the Palestinian people.
Now we have the Israelis, who have brought about this series of events by denying the Palestinian people the right to choose their own government, and launching an illegal and warlike blockade of an (allegedly) sovereign territory, telling outright lies about a bombing of a UN school compound in Gaza.
To quote Mr. Whitley directly from yesterday's BBC Newsnight programme:
"[We have] No evidence... [of Hamas] militants inside the [school] compound, which has been used to shelter people from the area and we don't think that there was any fighting taking place actually from the school itself."
As with the illegal invasion of Lebanon and the attack on a UN outpost (killing two) by the Israeli army, we are witnessing war crimes carried out by a nuclear power with the direct backing of Zionist America.
During the invasion of Lebanon the attack on the UN post was almost a carbon copy of the bombing of the UN School in Gaza. Here's a snippet from a news report at the time (4th link below):
In his statement, Mr. Annan said that the “coordinated artillery and air attack” occurred despite personal assurances given to him by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that UN positions would be spared fire. The Secretary-General said the post, near the Lebanese town of Khiyam, was “long established and clearly marked.” [our emphasis].
It is clear that Israel, like it's Zionist bedfellow America has scant regard for international law and just bombs, shoots, bulldozes, tortures and ethnically cleanses whoever the hell it likes with impunity.
Now it's time for Israel to answer for its War Crimes... or are we to believe that only Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Germans and Anti-Communist East Europeans can be hounded to the grave for alleged "war crimes," whilst the invaders of Lebanon and Gaza go unpunished?
Some might say - anti-Semites to a man no doubt! - that this reeks of "one law for them and another law for us."
Still as babies are blown apart and parents left to wail in the streets as their innocent children die at the hands of an invading superpower we can all sit back and watch Anne Frank on BBC TV every night this week!
What a delicious sense of irony the BBC scheduler must have.
Link:
Andrew Whitley Warns of Gaza Crisis, April 2007
Andrew Whitley states 18 months of blockade
UN state there were no (Hamas) Militants in Bombed School
Israel Attacked a UN structure in Lebanon too!
Just how many war crimes can Israel commit before ANYONE here takes a stand?
You think we don't live in a one party state?
Which party - Lib-Lab-Con-UKIP-BNP - will dare to denounce the Zionist aggression?
The Zionists have banned journalists because they know witnesses scattered around would expose their lies about "Hamas fighters" or "Hamas rockets" at the sites of atrocities, in schools, Mosques, homes etc.
If Jews were dying in this fashion and at this rate they would call it a "holocaust" and Hollywood would have the script-writers in already making another blockbuster. As Kate Winslett's character put it in "Extras" - do a Holocaust film and you're guaranteed an Oscar!
Brown, Cameron, Farage, Griffin, and Mr. Who-he of the Liberals -- all are Zionists to a man!
They all support the illegal Zionist state. They all stand by and say nothing as innocent Palestinians die in their 100s.
Just as none of them will denounce the Rothschilds and others who strangle us with debt and ruin our economy.
Vote for who you want dumb goys! THEY ARE ALL BOUGHT AND PAID FOR WITH SHEKELS!
Shame on all the Lodge members in all the political parties!
No doubt they are all praying for some (Mossad organised/inspired) "terror" outrage in revenge so they can further justify their foppish stance on the worldwide criminal conspiracy known as Zionism.
Wake up White man!
You are being conned. Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, Iran...
These people are determined to wage an endless war, so we always have a bogeyman to help us take our eyes off our crumbling once-Christian civilisation.
Ask not for whom the bell tolls...
She's at it again!
If I said someone was beating the Israeli drum in the print media you'd probably guess right off that I'm on about the arch-Zionist Melanie Phillips (pictured right).
In yesterday's Daily Mail, "Mad Mel" as she is (non)affectionately known was screeching like a Zionist banshee because Gordon Brown had visited the Saudis to seek an answer, or rather a financial bail-out, to the banking crisis.
She wails on and on about the Saudis exporting "Islamofascism" via their particular breed of Islam and how Gordon Brown underestimates the threat be going there, reinforcing the 'acceptability' of the Saudi regime and so on and so forth.
There's an old lie about Hitler which describes him as a 'carpet muncher' because he's flail about on the floor in a rage. Yes, the usual Soviet-style Hollywood claptrap devoid of serious historical study and debate... but on reading Mad Mel you can quite believe that this kind of carpet munching (not the 'Brighton variety') goes on in the offices of the Daily Mail as the Arch Zionist prepares her diatribe.
So let's look at Mad Mel's latest offering which would have been lapped up by all Neo Cons, Israel Firsters, Kosher Tories, NuBNPers, Judeo-Masons, Zionists and all their fellow travellers and useful idiots.
Mad Mel thinks the "credit crunch" et al has reached a dangerous juncture because this will allow the Saudis to get yet another finger in yet another pie, and the Saudis are - of course - mad mullahs, Islamofascists and emissaries for the new caliphate!
Does anyone else get a glimpse of Israeli foreign policy here? A spot of jealousy from the country that demands all "Western countries" put its interests ahead of any others!
Of course we can't turn to Israel for help - because the country runs at a loss and is notoriously corrupt. If it weren't for American and other bank-rolling, Israel couldn't possibly exist. It would be a financial disaster!
Now no-one in their right-mind could possibly find the Saudi regime acceptable in and of itself, if only for its nepotistic dictatorship. However, when nations deal with China and Israel (murderers inc.) why should we be surprised they turn to Saudi Arabia?
What Mel won't tell you of course is that the Judeo-Masons have caused the whole economic recession. The roots of it were the selling of mortgages to Americans who couldn't afford them by one Ron Sandler (see my posts on that Zionist con man!) and the whole bunch of financiers from shyster mortgage sellers to the big Wall Street banks all let their greed get the better of them (thus fulfilling so many stereotypes as to warm the cockles of any sincere "anti-Semite.") and we've all suffered the consequences.
What Mel also won't tell you ("What! Could she be so insincere?" you cry!) is that the Islamic banking system -- which is loosely similar to what traditional Christianity espouses: i.e. that banking should be usury-free -- hardly suffered from the domino effect of the banks collapsing throughout the Capitalist world.
Mel, presumably, doesn't want you to know who runs the banks, why and how they run the banks, nor that there is a form of usury-free banking that wouldn't suffer from boom and bust, wouldn't strangle people with never-ending debt etc. etc.
Nor does Mel find it outrageous when the UK borrows money at interest from one bunch of alien financiers so we can bail-out another bunch of alien financiers.
Some say that Jews were unfairly painted as Usurers and Coin-Clippers in the Middle Ages.
Some say Jews are unfairly pointed at as playing a pivotal role in the sub-prime mortgage business, in financier-banking and in international banking generally.
Some say that Medieval man believed the earth was flat (hint: they never did!).
Some say whatever they think we need to hear in order to cover the tracks of the biggest con-men in history.
But let's get back to Mad Carpet Munching Mel (oh must we....?).
Why does she rail against the Saudis so? yes, yes - we have all the surface reasons, but let's dig a little deeper.
The Saudis are one of America's strongest allies. The Saudis are loathed by "Islamic terrorists" for that very reason. The Saudis have huge business interests in America. And as the leftist agitator Michael Moore has documented, the links between the Saudis (even the Bin Ladens) and Neo Cons like the Bush family cannot be denied.
So what has led Mad Mel to launch this broadside against such an ally of the American and British regimes? An avowed target of the "Islamic extremists?"
I can only conclude that it is a way to throw up a semi-false "moral outrage" at Saudi (read "Islamicist") involvement so as to throw up a fog around the Zionist involvement in the whole debacle from its old roots to its recent flowering (if that can be an apt word - unless there is a flower with the nomenclature of s##tweed!).
Unless of course Mad Carpet Munching Mel is so tied-in with Israel and its black ops and psychological warfare in the UK, that she needs to formulate the jealousy of the Terrorist Bandit Zionist State in a column that uses the 'fear of nightmares' and "islamofascist" bogeymen to try and pooh pooh yet another multi-billion pound business deal between the UK and the Saudis.
Perhaps the truth lies somewhere between, or perhaps the lies truly nestle in both reasonings?
Perhaps only Mad Mel and her handler know the truth about the lies.
Meanwhile the Neo Cons, Israel Firsters, Kosher Tories, NuBNPers, Judeo-Masons, Zionists and all their fellow travellers and useful idiots will be toasting this diatribe from Carpet-Muncher-Phillips as "incisive" and a poke in the eye for "political correctness" blinded to the real agenda of the spooks and their operatives.
'Twas ever thus, of course.
Meanwhile the real terrorists - the Iluminati, the bankers, the Judeo-Masons - continue to throw millions into poverty, wage-slavery, needless wars and false flag terrorism.
Still, why look the hideous facts of the recession in the face when we can all wail at the visage of the Mossad/CIA "islamofascist" bogeymen, all conjured up by Mad Mel and the other Mossad supporting/employed journalists.
Which is the lesser of two evils?
Obama (Black Liberal) | 2 (5%) |
McCain (White 'Neo Con') | 5 (14%) |
It's so irrelevant as Israel runs America | 28 (80%) |
The BNP leaders, activists and members need to read this!
Where does the threat come from?
Right: Who runs our government, who runs the big businesses, who runs the banking system, who runs the media? Here the permatanned ex-petty terrorist Peter Hain prostrates himself as he celebrates Cohens (sorry.... Tescos) create more shelf-stacking jobs: jobs he would never contemplate doing.
Who controls the State that enacts so many anti-national, anti-freedom and anti-Christian laws emanate from?
Who puts its emissaries in political parties - including NATIONALIST ones - thus reducing democracy to Tweedledum and tweedledummer politics?
Hint: it ain't "the muzzies."
Now wake up and smell the coffee before you too stoop to kiss the bloody boots of a murderous and treacherous system.
Link:
The Zionists Control Britain
Here we go again.
It seems some Zionists and their fellow travellers on Stormfront are moaning about this blog again.
Right: Paul Wolfowitz, one of a breed of arrogant Neo Cons, Banksters and hucksters that have taken our world to the brink of world war and financial collapse. Yet some still fear to mention the Judeo-Masonic nature of civilisation's enemy. They would rather latch onto Sun Editorials and clown-like figures like Abu "Captain Hook" Hamza who are comedy caricatures created by a Zionist media whilst the real criminals make billions and start wars.
Our "crime?"
To support the Palestinian people!
Shock horror! yes our line is that of Nationalism for decades. Our policy is anti-Zionist.
We do not think Israel has the right to exist: it is founded on a falsehood, it was founded by terror and it exists through terrorism, extortion and blackmail.
A sure sign of a Zionist or an Israel-Firster is that whenever you say you support Palestine you become a "muzzie lover."
The difference between us and them of course is whilst we say we don't support Islam (or Hinduism, or Sikhs... etc.) we also say that Judaism is evil, and that the whole worldview of organised Zionism (read Kabbalistic, Masonic etc. etc.) is one of dripping hatred for all things Christian.
We also do not shy away from saying that the main threat historically, currently and in the future comes from Zionists.
Even "Al Qaeda" and "911" have all the hallmarks of the CIA and Mossad.
So to the Zionists we say "blow wind and crack your cheeks" - for the more you wail and bring out the Muslim bogeyman the more you embarrass yourselves and show your Neo Con agenda.
