Racial Awareness Day

It must've been Racial Awareness Day recently for I heard some ridiculous news items.

One was a pair of overpaid African footballers releasing a (c)rap song against "racism in football."

Really?

Children are shot and stabbed in the street and even the media acknowledge that most of this comes from 'immigrant communities' - yet it's so important to "stamp out" virtually non-existent "racism" in football!!!

Meanwhile in America some "civil rights" bunch of overpaid politicos wanted action against racism after (get ready for this!) a teacher in New York was sent a letter with a little model noose in it!

Hold the front pages!

Children are shot with gay abandon (see 1950s dictionary for details) with a worrying regularity in the states, and much of this comes from 'immigrant communities' -- is anyone spotting the connection here? -- and we should be worried about one childish letter???

Still - we're told millions more people will live here because of immigration.

Have we learnt no lessons from the past? Our children are taught (c/o Al Gore) about the "evils" of global warming yet we have no open and honest debate about immigration.

Guns, drugs, gangs, violence, no-go areas, muggings...

The media always tells us we "benefit" from immigration.

NO.

Big business benefits from a cheap workforce. Politicians benefit from people who sit on benefits and vote accordingly.

But how do we benefit? From the countryside being concreted over? From the gangs and guns? From increased taxes to pay for schools, hospitals etc.? From the break-up of our own communities? From the loss of identity?

Mass immigration, mass coloured immigration, has been a disaster.

We have gained NOTHING. We have lost a culture, a nation, a birthright, security, identity etc.

And now they tell us that 10 or 20 million more will pour in by such and such a date, as if we have no say, no rights, there is no debate.

Gonads to global warming! We'll be swamped by millions of immigrants long before we ever get swamped by the seven seas!

We have enough criminals, rapists, gangsters and low lives of our own - with no need to import more whose state of rootlessness makes them fodder for the criminal gangs.

With Us or Against Us Mr. Bush?

"Is it me?" is a modern-day cry of those bewildered by the bizarre nature of political correctness and the opaque nature of the lies spun by governments (primarily those based in Westminster, Washington DC and Brussels/Strasbourg).

It has become a badge of honour to those who were brought up to believe in honesty, clear speaking and calling a spade a spade.

In the last 48 hours I have found myself mumbling this statement of defiance against modernist obfuscation in the matter of two pending wars.

The first is the war planned against Iran. Zionist(s in) America wants this war. Therefore we read in the weekend papers how British and American special forces have already been make "excursions" into Iran to fight the Revolutionary Guards... etc. etc.

A sovereign nation is invaded by our army (not for the first time) and Brown, like Blair before him, batters not an eyelid. Our "democratic" Masonic overlords have given their approval: and that is what matters!

Meanwhile the Communist Kurdish PKK have been shelling Turkey. Turkey is itching to invade Iraq to try and bash the PKK, and what to Bush and Brown do?

Urge restraint!

I see.

So it's OK for the UK and the USA to invade Iraq over a false, made-up "dodgy dossier." Equally it's fine for our forces to be sent into Iran over more WMD shenanigans (via orders coming from Tel Aviv)...

Yet when Turkey wants to move against "terrorists" on their own border - Bush and Co "urge restraint!"

It shows what a farce the war against Iraq and the planned war against Iran are.

Did Bush ever show restraint? Did Blair?

Iran is no threat to us, nor its neighbours.

There is one "nation" in the Mid East which starts wars, invades neighbours, bombs nearby states, embroils our troops in non-winnable conflicts, and has illegal nukes, already probably aimed on us and other European nations.

That "nation" is Israel.

Still, as the Kurds are no threat to Israel (some say they are allied!) Turkey is urged to "show restraint."

Whatever happened to zero tolerance of "terrorists" - where are the B52s over Kurdish-Iraq? Under Bush's own agenda and using his own (garbled) statements as a rule of thumb, surely anyone who isn't against the "terrorists" is for the "terrorists" -- so in urging restraint, isn't he taking the stance taken by (e.g.) the French prior to the war in Iraq?

Remember the American politicians and the Murdoch press (heck, let's just call them "Zionists"!) labelled them "cheese-eating surrender monkeys?"

Yet when it comes to other "terrorists" Bush doesn't want gung-ho action and Rumsfeldesque "precision bombing" (aka wiping out wedding parties etc.).

That's the key to international conflicts and modern geo-politics:

What Israel tells its American sugar daddy is the right thing, and that is what becomes the policy of the "international community."

Ignorance and Revisionism

In recent weeks and months the BBC has performed a series of Mea Culpas over reporting duplicity and rigged phone votes.

Other channels have suffered too, but the BBC (which many, though not nationalists, have regarded as a study of probity and honesty) has been most dreadfully damaged because of its reputation for "fairness".

So the BBC (with its in-house production and external producers) have taken a battering - pretty much choreographed, but a battering nonetheless.

Integrity. Honesty. Truthfulness. Openness.

These seem to be the benchmarks of the 'New BBC.'

Yet, just like New Labour and (Brown's) New New Labour, this is so much exterior whitewashing, and whilst at first (as with the newspapers' denouncement of Paparazzi intrusive photos after the death of Princess Di) it appears to be shiny white with heartfelt promises being made throughout the media - it won't take long for the cracks to start showing again: for it is the very nature of the media to make things far more certain and far more "sexy" than they are in our 'real lives' which tend to be far more drab, hypocritical, mundane... than BBC reports might have it.

And so how long before the BBC bring out another "fake-umentary" with "evil Neo-Nazis" or "extremist Christian fundamentalists" etc. etc.

How long before the BBC addresses the real problems with multi-culturalism and mass coloured immigration? Or the damage done to society by abortion? Or the harmful nature (to individual, community and nation) of homosexuality? Or the truth about usury and the banking swindle?

How long before the BBC puts out a programme defending our Christian heritage instead of mocked-up "history" full of modern ideals and spin?

In the last few weeks I've had the misfortune to see the Tudors, the BBC2 "history" of an early Henry VIII, made very much in the manner of the series 'Rome.' I've also seen a couple of the programmes of the new Robin Hood series.

The Tudors is crammed full of Grade A Bull Guano in which only St. Thomas Moore and Henry's first wife are seen to be fully Christian... and even in these cases Moore keeps banging on about being a "humanist." Since when does a Christian saint subscribe to the ideals of Freemasonry - and those from a latter century? Of course, Catherine of Aragon is pretty much dismissed as a foreignor.

It all stinks of a modern re-write of history.

We should be used to the lies (from the pens of Jusaisers and Zionists) concerning events such as the Spanish Inquisition or World War Two - all done for political ends - but now we're facing the twisting of hitherto accepted norms, such as St Thomas Moore actually being a Christian.

As for the BBC's Robin Hood - well that just limps from outrage to outrage.

Some of the long-term readers of this blog (you die-hards, you gluttons for punishment!) will know that I have written a diatribe about this series before (there was a negro sergeant-at-arms in the first series). Now we have the ridiculous situation of an Asian (Saracen) woman (and she a genius too!) in Hood's Saxon outlaws and yet another negro! - this time as a genius (as ever!) blacksmith (though they just called him a smith - very pc) in the village of Locksley.

With two Negroes in close proximity of Nottingham, one would be forgiven for thinking that there must have been thousands of coloureds living the length and breadth of England at this time!

Add in the Asians (supposedly) living in England too - and you can see the message being sent out far and wide: we were a peaceful multi-culti land back then - just as we are now!

What the concocters of this garbage forget is that the Saxons fought the Normans to remain free... and these were related peoples. The same concocters tend to overlook the Crusades, at least when they are mentioned at all, the heroes tend to speak out against them (again, in a very "humanist" way).

See the message: Christianity is bad. Homogeneity is bad. The English (apart from a "Masonic" Saint!?!) were ambivalent to the Faith and uncultured morons. Whereas Multi-Culti is good. Race-mixing was accepted. Other cultures brought understanding and learning.

Our history, our heritage, our religion, our peoples, our nations - everything about us is being undermined by a set of politically correct degenerates.

We should not... no, strike that. We must not accept these outrageous assaults on our history, on our forefathers.

A few re-edited scenes regarding the Queen? Who cares? - well ok, it is indicative of a wider editorial malaise in the BBC that sees them making fast and loose with the facts; but compare it to willful re-writing of our history and the rush to transfer the multi-culti, Freemasonic ideals (of a failed experiment!) to an age when our people were Christian, secure, homogeneous...

No-one is suggesting that all in the garden was rosy: but the idea of our forefathers being ignorant uncultured savages is a nonsense. They were probably more aware of their country, their way of life, their Faith, their freedoms, their soil and their blood than the great swathe of Sun-reading, Eastenders-watching morons today who keep placing their faith in treacherous Masonic politicians.

That's why even when Henry VIII tried to claim more powers for himself by closing the monasteries and grabbing the land -- which had been used to support the monastic institutions which cared for the sick, the poor and the destitute (as well as travellers) which would have to be replaced years later by the awful workhouses -- revolts and uprisings occurred, amongst other places, in Yorkshire and the West Country some of which had to be put-down by hired mercenaries from abroad.

Today the land is grabbed by absentee landlord insurance conglomerates to be farmed by huge chemical agri-business and what do the people care about? Phone-ins being rigged on meaningless chewing-gum TV which only the brain-dead would have the notion would be 'money well spent!'

Did the people of Devon and Yorkshire have more political awareness 500 years ago? More notion of freedom? More awareness of faith and heritage?

When I erringly stumble on a Sun editorial or I overhear someone talking about a family upheaval on some TV show, I am tempted to think so.

Orders: 24 hours again.

Just to let people know that the mail does seem to be getting back to normal, both incoming and outgoing.

Whilst the recent Post Strike was on we had some orders slowed down. However, it now seems that the orders are arriving promptly.

Our incoming mail was badly affected, especially as the Central London P.O. continued with wildcat strikes after the main P.O. was back in work.

Whilst there may be a tiny minority of delayed letters etc. it now looks like all is back to normal and you can expect to get your orders not only sent promptly, but arriving promptly too.

To date, October has been very quiet - perhaps because of the strike; so if you're thinking of placing an order, please do so and help keep us ticking over.

Chewing the Fat on Immigration

According to who you want to believe in media-land we're turning into a nation of fatties.

Obesity, so "they" tell us, is the "new Global Warming."

By that they don't mean another fallacy or con job (I suspect) but rather that this requires urgent attention!

The power of nightmares part 94.

Isn't it funny how those responsible for creating a mess are always the loudest in shrieking for something to be done?

Capitalism insists on the "power of advertising" which, in turn, creates a "do what thou wilt" society (to quote Alestair Crowley).

In an age when Big Bucks is all that matters, the shoddiest produced, brightly wrapped, crammed with sugar, heavily advertised "treats" will be the ones that sell.

Oh yes, things were so "drab" in the 50s when we all ate fresh veg and meat...

The Capitalists who bank-roll the political parties are the ones whose supermarkets insist on aisle after aisle of sweets, crisps, ready-made "meals" and other chemically-crammed foodstuffs.

With extra sweets n snacks piled up by the till just to get little Jack or Sophie pulling at mum's sleeve for one more pack of sugar disguised as food.

And the politicians? As someone phoned in to a radio this week said, they are the ones who've sold off the playing-fields and told schools that competitive sports are "bad."

Unless and until someone comes along who will fight against the big businesses, the TV and Playstation culture and demand football, hockey, netball and rugby for all schoolchildren three times a week - we'll be(come) a "nation of fatties."

But such things are not "popular" - ask Jamie Oliver (the "naked chef") who tried to get good food into schools... and in a "democracy" it isn't what is CORRECT that matters - but rather what is 'popular' or (to be more precise) what makes the most money and what the advertisers can make 'popular.'

Anyway, while we're at it - in this climate of continual studies to tell us what's bad for us, and the problems we'll face in the future - isn't it about time we had one of those on immigration?

And I mean a proper study and a proper debate!

Left: Immigration and Emigration figures. As most people leaving the UK (for Europe, North America etc.) are British and/or Whites - this merely exacerbates the situation. Many liberals and reds argue that we "need" immigration because people are leaving. What they don't tell us is the racial make-up of those leaving, nor that if it weren't for immigration and the mess it causes, many would not leave.

There was one of those ridiculous ones the other day about immigration from Eastern Europe - you know the highly politicised sort which cannot disguise the costs in schooling, healthcare and housing (let alone law and order) but which drones on about the benefits to our economy.

Now let me get one thing straight - and it's a contentious point for some I know: I am not opposed per se to immigration from Eastern Europe.

Many of these people are hard-working fellow Europeans who bring their White faces, Christian heritage to some of the 'darkest' areas of London, Birmingham etc.

The problem I have is with the Asiatic gypsies and criminal Albanians who have crept in under the cover of Lithuanians and Poles; the scale of the immigration (which should have been far more curtailed and controlled); and the lack of controls re. those with criminal records (rapists, thieves, etc.)

As an aside, I also take umbrage with the need for so many workers when we have so many druggy deadbeats, anarcho-do nothings and others who sit on the dole getting my tax money for doing bugger all. If they won't pick spuds or clean hotel rooms then why should they get continual hand-outs and housing benefit for life?

To my mind, a controlled amount of healthy, law-abiding families and a balanced mix of men and women from the Baltic Nations, Poland, Hungary etc. would be acceptable - just as the Poles and East Europeans who settled here after WW2 (many anti-Communists) settled, assimilated and became good "Brits" albeit with their own heritage and culture.

I have had the good fortune to meet many of these people - including those who served with distinction on the Eastern front fighting Bolshevism, and their families are perfectly settled, hard-working, tax-paying, Church-going Brits of European extraction.

One might compare them to the Irish of North London, the Italians of South Wales and others who have assimilated and added European cultures to our homeland.

No, I am not opposed per se to Poles and Balts - more so the manner in which the influx occurred.

For me it is not so much about space (though this must be taken into account, obviously) but RACE.

So, to return to my point, let us have a real study, a real report, a real debate.

Our inner cities are awash with drugs, gangs and drugs. These have killed more than any so-called Al Qaeda "threat" (or CIA/Mossad threat).

Where is the debate? The children and grandchildren of the African and Asian settlers of the 50s, 60s and 70s have brought us what exactly?

Why are those still flooding in from Africa and Asia never talked about?

The Poles are put up as a "smokescreen." What about the Afghanis, the Somalis, the Bangladeshis, the Pakistanis that are still flooding in?

While we're at it, let's have a debate about the impact on our country, our culture, our communities?

Communities in London, Berkshire, the Midlands, Lancashire etc. etc. have been destroyed. Communities where everyone knew everyone and the door was always open: these days have evaporated.

Left: An industry has sprung up, including advisers, solicitors, community workers and council helpers which tells immigrants how best they can get free housing, free healthcare, free food, free money and more. This book claims to be for professionals and visitors, but much of the advice available out there, to those from the Third World, goes to those who come to milk the benefit system.

The Christian nature (however nominal) of our land has imploded in a wave of Muslims, Sikhs, Zoroastrians , Buddhists, Animists and (literally!) God knows what else - and the cohesive nature of Faith has been replaced by a fractious, antagonistic mess whilst our own creed has faced frontal assault by Communists in local government and an "ecumenical" fifth column of Reds and faggots from the 'oh so modern' seminaries.

Communities that were homogenous, Christian, hard-working, law-abiding have been replaced by what?

I was near my old junior school the other week as it emptied. Talk about spot the white child! These are Asians born here, so they won't even figure in any immigration statistics and yet in 10 - 15 years the community I grew up in will be even more Asian than it is now!
What have we to thank immigration for?

Big Business has profited by under-cutting wages which the government tells us is a good thing ("it helps the economy").

We have more curry restaurants and rap music.

Is that worth it? Is it worth the upheaval? The violence? The drugs? The guns? The alienation? The family break-down? The rootless offspring?

So whilst liberals and quangos bring out reports, stimulate media headlines and constantly whine on about Global Warming, obesity and whatever else is the flavour of the day -- we face a media lockdown and government lies about long-scale, mass immigration, especially in regard to non-Europeans.

It's enough to make you turn to chocolate and crisps!

Freedom's Fashion

We've promoted our FREE ERNST ZUNDEL badge as a means to raise funds to help the brave defender of academic and historic freedoms Ernst Zundel.

According to David Williams (who he?) of Searchlies "[the badge] will no doubt become this season's essential fashion accessory for the discerning fascist eager to advertise his or her bigotry."

Well quite!

What they see as a put-down actually encompasses exactly what the badge should be, but rather than displaying "bigotry," the badge actually shows the wearer's adherence to freedom and their refusal to bow to the lies, pressure and blackmail of a Zionist behemoth which engages in locking up writers and academics, as well as attacking sovereign nations and excusing the murderous actions of a terrorist regime which illegally occupies Palestine.

Still... the thought was there!

Support Ernst Zundel. Buy and wear the badge!

Go get it:

Link
Free Ernst Zundel Badge

Nationalist Online Encyclopaedia

NATIONALIST COUNTER-WIKIPEDIA SITE

A good friend sent me the following text received from French comrades:

Have a look on our new web-project :

www.eruditus.info

C'est une encyclopédie sur internet, comme wikipedia, mais d'esprit contre-révolutionnaire.

en.eruditus.info en anglais

fr.eruditus.info en français

et pourquoi pas d'autres langues.

www.eruditus.info deviendrait alors le site d'accueil général redirigeant vers les sites en différentes langues.

---

I urge all FC readers and supporters to visit the site and help it in whatever way you can.

The French nationalists behind the site are absolutely genuine and their politics are our politics.

Visitez vous le site [repeat that in your best schoolboy French!]

Era of No-Change

Gordon Brown says it's an era of change...

David Cameron says only he can deliver real change.

How long before people realise that this bunch of rich Freemasons will just deliver: more of the same.

You can sense a rant starting can't you dear reader?

Suffice to say that the usual downward spiral will continue.

Unless and until we get a political leader who has the cajones to stand up to the vested interests and the moral fibre to stand out against the background of money-grubbing, corruption and nepotism we might as well forget the whole party charade, stacked as it is in favour of all things Masonic.

There's a saying, anyone who wants to be Prime Minister should be automatically barred from the job.

Thus far that saying has yet to be proved wrong, no matter which party you like at.

There. I avoided a rant! Though it wasn't easy! ;-)

Liberal and Zionist: It's the BNP

A good friend, whose integrity and honesty are well regarded throughout the wider nationalist cause sent me this, and I think it is of interest to those within the BNP (who are kept in the dark) and those who seek to oppose the liberalisation and (dare I say it?) Zionification of the "nationalist movement" of which the BNP is a part:

One of my sources within the BNP writes:

"Griffin seems to be getting rid of his old Executive Committee, and forming a new invisible one, incorporating;

Arthur Kemp; Tony Lecomber; Patrick Harrington; Simon Darby; Lee Barnes. This inner circle is nothing to do with the EC, but the real people that Griffin shares ideas with. As the EC can get rid of the Party Chairman by a two thirds majority if they wish, rumour has it that Griffin is moving to abolish the EC.

"Doc Russell [FC: BNP Press Officer] had a heated argument with Arthur Kemp about Tony Lecomber. Kemp told him he was a useless fat old f###er who should just go away. This was the real reason for his departure, and not because of Doc's first wife being Polish.

"The general feeling amongst the (ever growing) anti-Griffin crowd, is that Griffin wishes to use the European elections to put all the party's resources into fighting the best seat. Griffin hopes to get elected, whereby he'll be on £250,000 a year tax free + expenses + pension. After five years, he would then be in a position to switch parties if he so wished (ahem), and then possibly retain his seat for another five years.

"Ciao for now,"

It's an interesting thought that of those on this list, Arthur Kemp has been named by Gaye Darby-Lewis (wife of jailed South African patriot Clive Darby-Lewis) as a South African police spy, Simon Darby (who lives a comfortable middle class life style without visible means of support, and claims to be in business while working virtually full time for the BNP, without drawing a salary from the party) is probably a career MI5 agent, while the late John Tyndall suspected that Tony Lecomber had been "turned" by the British state during his second spell in gaol (when he received a remarkably light sentence for attacking a Jewish school teacher). Lee Barnes is completely insane, while Patrick Harrington is nominally the leader of another political party (the Third Way)!

Happy Michaelmas!

Today is Michaelmas - or St Michael's Day.

Right: The Michaelmas Daisy.

For hundreds of years the people of England and Europe kept this day as a special feast, almost on a par with Christmas... in the days before multi-culti mass immigration, before the mines, 'Satanic' mills and furnaces of industrialism and before the rampant usury of the Bank of England, founded in 1694.

Still after the dilution and chaos of immigration, the slavery and maltreatment of industrialism and the huge taxation and asset-stripping of the banking swindle... why should we want to remember the days of 'Merrie England' when our peoples were indigenous, our whole culture was Christian, and our people and our soil were inextricably linked?

After all haven't wage-slavery, miscegenation and usury-taxes "enriched" us all?

Left: Perhaps the most widely used image of St Michael.

So a very Happy Michaelmas to those brave souls out there who remember the freedoms and customs of our forefathers.

Maybe one day we'll celebrate this day again? Maybe one day we'll live in a land of freedom and identity? Maybe one day the land will be full of small-holdings in which Michaelmas will herald a full table, a lit candle and a home full of merry-making?...

A great darkness covers our land.

But we await the dawn: despite the traitor politicians, despite the usury bankers, despite the profiteering Capitalists...

In the meantime raise a glass for Michaelmas and let us rekindle the traditions of our forefathers!


Right: Michaelmas. by Graham Sutherland, 1928.

Iran is no threat: but the Neo-Cons are!

Dear reader, grizzled veteran that you are, your Bull####-Meter must have had its needle on red almost continually for the last few days.

For not only has the Labour Party conference followed hot on the heels of the Lib-Dems, but we've also had the American media and Whitehouse response to Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad appearances in New York and its environs.

Left: He's started no illegal wars, he's not bankrolling any state with illegal nuclear weapons, he's not sending torture victims around the world...

What was the top moment of hyperbole and hypocrisy for you? I'm sure everyone has their favourite...

Mine was a Whitehouse spokesman complaining of Iranian involvement in Iraq.

Yes: Iran's involvement.

Not America's illegal war against Iraq.
Not America's nonsense over WMDs.
Not America's involvement in a sovereign nations thousands of miles away.
Not America's army and mercenaries killing Iraqi civilians.

Right: An image to break a thousand editorials. Approx 25,000 Jews live in Iran and despite specific financial inducements to live in Israel only a handful chose to leave. They enjoy civil and religious liberties in Iran. Here the President greets an anti-Zionist Jew at a Holocaust revisionist conference.

No... Tsk tsk.

Can't you see you fool??? It's all Iran's fault!!!

Isn't it all so clear?

Israel bomb, strafe and invade Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Egypt... and no warning from America (even after they bombed the USS Liberty!)

Iran are a neighbouring nation to Iraq and they played no part in sabre-rattling for the war, or instigating the war...

But do not blame Bush & America.

Do not blame his poodle Blair & the Westminster marionettes.

Do not even blame Israel for their foreign policy dictating Middle East conflicts or their lobby's control of Washington DC, or their possession of illegal nukes!!!

No: blame the guy who asks for open debate of history. Isn't that a threat to world peace? Ha ha ha!!!

Left: Kosher protesters use a Kosher newspaper front-page to push the US administration's Kosher message. Are they now trying to blame "911" on Iran? They tried that with Iraq and it was laughed at.

In a post-Saddam world the Neo-Cons need another "Mr Nasty" and whilst most of us would line up a Neo-Con, they've chosen Ahmadinejad, as the current bete noir of the Zionist warmongers.

Now wait for all their Neo-Con buddies and Kosher Tories (in the media and in political parties) line up to denounce Ahmadinejad as a holocaust-denier, as a war-monger and as a "mad Muslim."

By their fruits shall you know them... in other words: wot speaks like a Kosher Neo-Con IS a Kosher Neo-Con guvnor, no matter how they spin it out.

For more info and analysis see the FC e-zine #2901.

Link:
Iranian Speech to the UN
Iranian Speech at Columbia Uni

Quote to annoy Zionist supremacists and "Chosenites":

Human beings are all God's creatures and are all endowed with dignity and respect. No one has superiority over others. No individual or states can arrogate to themselves special privileges, nor can they disregard the rights of others and, through influence and pressure, position themselves as the "international community".

Searchlight "Homophobes?"

The September issue of Searchlies has all the usual mix of... well you know: the usual diatribes, half-truths, tittle tattle etc.

But what is it on the back cover? An advert for an anti-fascist Calendar (write "pick up my giro" on every other Thursday) which has a main picture of a man crusty kissing a woman crusty.

Now admittedly you have to look twice because of the preponderance of hair, but judging by the length of the stubble, one of them is a female of the species.

Tsk tsk.

Whatever would Gordon Brown say? Such a blatant promotion of "heterosexuality" (what normal people call "normalness").

Not so inclusive...

The Homosexuals Against Fascism And the Bigotry Of You (Hafaboy) have denounced Searchlight as "typical post-Stalinist Communist revisionist renegades moving against the communal spirit of the Fourth International."

A spokesman for Searchlight said "Well, I'll be buggered!"

A spokesman for MI5 responded: "Hang on then, I'll phone Peter Marriner."

Brown = No Change

Tony Blair has moved his B.S. machine from Downing Street out to Tel Aviv, which seems somehow fitting.

Gordon Brown promised "change."

To tell us all that things had... er... changed - we had a constant mantra of "change."

Now the Labour Party is decamped to Brighton and yesterday we had the joy of a speech from Commissar Brown himself.

Change was still prominent. No change there then... (sorry).

Yet the buzzword of the day/week was "STRENGTH." Brown is a strong leader see -- geddit?

Oh how lucky we poor proles are to have such a strong leader!

Things may be crumbling and crime endemic and a police state unfolding and identity lost everywhere and... well: you get the picture.

But fear not oh reader of The Sun and watcher of Eastenders, you valiant breed of the braindead: Mr. Brown is STRONG and there has been CHANGE. So all is well.

Were that it were so.

Take my hand, dear reader, and follow me as we skip down memory lane betwixt the failed politicians and discontinued sweets of our youth. Ah! Bitter sweet memories.

As we gaze around at all the failures, tyrants and con-men of the past we begin to wonder at how people can be taken in so many times.

Suddenly we're back in the present and we look at Brown's slogans and promises with renewed skepticism. Where is this change? The same regime blurting out the same hackneyed multi-culti soft-lefty Capitalist garbage.

They promise us the world and deliver us a slum to rival Imperial Calcutta.

As long as these shysters are fettered to the banking swindle and usury they cannot escape the debt bubble which will yet ruin more people, families and small businesses.

As long as these traitors are shackled to the failed multi-culti experiment they cannot deliver "pride," "identity" or "community" all of which they have done their utmost to destroy for decades.

(Left a horribly White 1957 socialist poster from New Zealand. Just think how "enriched" we've all become since 1957...).

As long as these hucksters are members of the same Lodges as the newspaper barons and top policemen they will not stop the country rolling inexorably towards a Big Brother police state. "It stops crime" they wail and entreat - forgetting to tell us that they are the ones who created the crime and this lawless society.

As long as these profiteers are chained to the corrupt bureaucracy in Brussels whatever we may wish is inconsequential because laws to worsen our situation will be made for us by our Socialist overlords.

So what change can there ever be?

Will Brown close the door on immigration?

Will Brown stop the slaughter of the innocents?

Will Brown stop the usury and debt?

Will Brown stop the rampant greed of Big Business?

Will Brown stop the slide to an EU-USSR?

No.

So Change is a term which means nothing.

Perhaps the cherry on the cake, oh long-persevering reader, was when Brown used a Biblical quote to justify not supporting the family!

This Big Business-hugging usury huckster wants us to believe that somehow supporting the institution of marriage is "unChristian."

Of course, coming from a regime that has done more than any in 100s of years of history to promote buggery and the "rights" of homosexuals this is a farce.

Brown would have us believe that his abortionist, homosexual, Masonic-banking, humanist-drivel charabanc is Christian!?!?

Blair is gone. Brown is regent.

The Spin is dead! Long live the spin!

Pizza-based philosophy

Our intrepid hero stirs from his semi-conscious daydream.

He is surrounded by matching decor, modern chairs, gut-wrenching murals celebrating "life" and there seems a preponderance of very large windows allowing him to view the grey skies which are, at least, more alive and natural - unlike the charade unfolding before him which is interrupted only occasionally by the cries of a small child (or two).

The mind-numbing banality of the "trendy" building (which is vaguely round) has seeped into his very being and he looks bemused at the rest of his family as one of the servers busies him or herself clearing away items off the table in front of them, while the boss (in charge of the proceedings) looks on from the side with a glib look on his face, his hands clasped in a all too smug pose.

Where was our brave adventurer? At some happy clappy, evangelifish, ecumenical open-plan Church of Latter Day Morons?

No, dear reader, though apart from some large black ladies wobbling around and "praising the lord" there was little difference.

This was one of those chain pizzerias and the hero of the tale was loathe to be there, but as the Peruvians say, "needs must when the devil vomits in your shoes" etc.

And so what passes for pizzas were dished up, one in the latest fashion of these things (there's been square ones, quartered ones, stuffed-crust ones and so on). A pizza for all seasons.

Oh joy. If hell really is other people, then a long time in purgatory must be these kind of "restaurants" to stretch the term beyond all meaning and recognition.

Still, this particular visit to one of America's execrable exports went with one memorable and humorous moment as, sandwiched between a moment of Simpsons-esque chomping with food and beverages flying in all directions, one of the sprogs made a pleasantly refreshing observation.

Some of the regular blog readers may remember how one of them made the link between noise and students as we played eye-spy in a pub-outing in the Summer. The very same sprog had us laughing uncontrollably again with yet another pertinent pronouncement on this occasion.

We had been generally swapping moans, rants and funny asides in the jocular familial way many of you will be familiar with.

Somehow or other the word prostitute came into the conversation, which had the two youngest sprogs looking blankly whilst the eldest coughed politely and looked into his glass.

"What's a prostanute" asked the tiniest sproglet in all innocence, to which the other innocent - honestly, I kid you not, replied "It's something to do with the government."

Cue the laughter!

Out of the mouths of babes... etc.

Clearly my years of ranting, finger waving and controlled foaming at the mouth have paid off!

Needless to add, I decided against opting for the tart for dessert. I don't think my double-entendre meter could stand that kind of pressure.

ISD Memorial Concert 2007

Hello to all the friends - old and new - we met at yesterday's Ian Stuart Memorial.

There were some old (very old!) friends there (I'm naming no names) and a good opportunity to chat with nationalists from across GB and Europe.

Band of the night had to be the ever-popular Blackout, for my money closely followed by John (of Nemesis doing his ballads) and Brutal Attack; but well done to all concerned - bands and organisers for no mean feat of such a well put on show.

Word was the turn-out was circa 1000, at a guesstimate.

Well done to all concerned.



P.S. B&H mag #37 - brand new out - is now available from FC (£2 plus postage).

Old Fashioned?

You are setting yourself up for a punchline if you ever say (aloud!) "I think I may have been born in the wrong century."

Some of you may remember John Tyndall being made the butt of jokes in Searchlies when he wrote to an Irish woman that he had one foot in the 19th Century and one foot in the 18th (not quoting verbatim obviously).

I can empathise to some degree though.

When we see the family crumble, when we see men turned into wage slaves or dole bums, when we see morality brushed aside as an inconvenience on the motorway to hedonism and/or big bucks, when we see whole communities brought to their knees through drugs and the crime endemic that drugs brings about; it does beg the question - why does it have to be this way?

That is not to say that I am ever misty eyed about the past, nor do I see our history through rose tinted specs (yeah... "shoulda gone to Specsavers!").

To take JT's analogy, the 18th Century was surely the time when most of our people were thrown off the land. The big businessmen made a lot money, the bankers ruled the world, Freemasonry was in the ascendancy.

The 19th Century was little better, in fact things got worse. Our people lived in single-room slum dwellings with no running water in cities like London, Manchester, Bristol etc. Men were worked like slaves (though "we" aren't allowed to demand reparations) in woefully poor conditions and to alleviate the slave-conditions, boredom, danger, monotony many turned to alcohol.

Those whose forefathers had farmed the land, who had formed the yeoman armies to defend the country, who had mixed work and leisure six days a week, who had drank alcohol in controlled quantities day in day out (akin to the French with their respect and love for wine today I guess) were turned into the worked-to-death, wage-slaves, slum-dwelling alcoholics of the 18th and 19th century cities.

There was an interesting programme on TV last night wherein the comedian Griff Rhys-Jones traced his family back to Merthyr Tydfil and Llanelli in South Wales. One of his forebears died in a drunken street brawl (in Llanelli) and another died in a pit explosion (in Merthyr).

When Rhys-Jones read a London newspaper's account of a visit to the pit his great grandad (?) died in he was horrified. The conditions, the health risks, the high mortality etc...

In a report (at the time) of the death of his ancestor the blame was put on the laziness of the workers. It was a lie. The men (he wasn't the sole death) died when underground gas ignited because they had to work by a naked flame.

As Rhys-Jones explained, the safety-lamp had been invented by then, but the men were made to buy them themselves... The mine owners (who built such fine, grandiose stately homes with their obscene profits) wouldn't even supply safety equipment to the men who worked, sorry... slaved, in those mines.

What a life!

Those were the days when if a man died he left a family behind with no means of support - again as the programme showed with the death of the man in Llanelli, whose family was then split up and sent off to become "inmates" at school-institutions (still, better than the horrors of the workhouse that many ended up in).

So there we have it.

I do wish we could revert to the days when the family was sacrosanct, when people felt an affinity to the land, when community was more than a pc "buzz word" and so on...

But to those who think the Victorian or similar times were somehow rosy (I guess we could label them reactionaries or some kind of conservatives) we need to be aware of the equally squalid nature of those times, although the people were affected in different ways.

The problem really is Capitalism. That is something that many nationalists have been loathe to understand or even recognise!

As an aside, I remember 20 years ago talking about this with a local treasurer for a "patriotic party" who then went off to complain that I was a "Communist."

In America, some circles of erstwhile "patriots" (albeit some are vaguely Neo-Cons) busy themselves denouncing people like Distributists, agrarians and similar as "Communists."

These kind of people have no understanding of history, politics and reality; many of them also seek to defend Capitalism as if it were somehow the patriotic, even the Christian option!

Let's recap:

Capitalism enclosed the land.

Capitalism forced our people into the slums, into the factories and down the mines.

Capitalism created the power of the banks and the tax system.

Capitalism has attacked the community and the family through policies designed to maximise profits - cheap foreign labour etc.

Capitalism has also tried to teach our people that morals don't matter, loyalty doesn't matter, nationhood doesn't matter: as long as the larder is full and a decent wage comes in - all else is secondary.

That is what Capitalism has done and what it is. It is not patriotic, it is not Christian, it is not moral.

Capitalism is all about profit, all about money. All else is secondary or an inconvenience.

What a shame the folk couldn't stay on the land. What a shame we couldn't retain that self-sufficiency, that minimal taxation.

What a shame that modern advances in medicine, for example, couldn't have been coupled with a retention of freedom, and of values that have all but disappeared.

Oh well...

As we are surrounded by immorality, by drugs and crime, by adulterers and profiteers, we should remember that our great grandfathers had it little better; but it shouldn't stop us (as brave souls did in their times) trying to right the wrongs, whilst exposing the Reds who offer paradise-on-earth but in reality offer the same slums, factories and wage-slavery (but all owned by the State fat boss instead of the Capitalist fat boss - as we've seen in Russia a few years ago, oft-times the very same men...)

Food for thought.




Links:
In 1851, a boy born in inner Liverpool had a life expectancy of only 26 years.
What is Distributism?

Northern Rock Bottom

And so after the government stepped in to prop up a banking system based on debt and meaningless bits of paper... the queues dissipated outside the Northern Rock branches yesterday.

Except for just one.

Where might that branch of the Northern Pebble be?

Yep: Golders Green!!! Oy Vey!

How very stereotypical!

Blood n Guts in Golders Green

For those of you following the rugby World Cup, and still mopping about after England's defeat by South Africa and Wales's defeat by Australia... all is not lost.

Apparently both "home nation" rugby squads are taking steps to strengthen their attack - especially in scrums, rucks and mauls.

Word is the team coaches have been showing the teams video footage of the "queues" outside the Northern Rock bank's Golders Green branch at the weekend!

For overseas readers: Northern Rock bank has had a rush on with customers withdrawing £2 Billion in two days, after a scare linked with the American sub-prime mortgage fiasco - and Golders Green is a heavily Jewish area of north London.

Happy Owain Glyndwr Day!

A very happy Owain Glyndwr Day to all our Welsh readers and those of Welsh descent.

Glyndwr is an inspiration for all those who fight for National Freedom; his story is one of sacrifice, victory, overwhelming odds and finally defeat and exile.

He wished Wales to be independent, to have its own University/ies, to be recognised by the Church as a sovereign nation, and who knows if the decline in the Welsh language of later centuries might not have happened had Glyndwr won the day.

The Owain Glyndwr 5 x 3 foot flag is available to buy at the FC Online Shop (contact us for details if you wish to pay via paypal).

Nationalism: Sweet and Sour

It's funny isn't it? - but when you're a youngster, in your teens especially, the world seems in the palm of your hand, and - full of the vim and vigour of youth - you set out on your crusade to "change the world."

Now far be it from me to burst any bubbles, but very rarely do any of these idealistic dreams of youth come true.

As Paul Weller of The Jam once sang: "The world is your oyster but your future's a clam."

Sure you'll meet and convince people of the truth, you may even turn an area into a thriving one for nationalism.

I remember doing all this and more, and losing some old friends and even getting in rows with family members etc. etc., all cheerfully done, of course, for "the party."

I don't want to burst any bubbles, especially for the youngsters out there embarking on the nationalist road but let's get a few things straight:

1. As a nationalist you're more likely to get shafted by a fellow nationalist, despite the attacks you may occasionally suffer from reds or immigrants.

2. All the work you do for "the party" will probably be undone by the party leadership, and lost when you leave having seen through the facade, or when there is factionalism within or without "the party."

3. Very little changes in this world unless it has the tacit approval of the Freemasons. That encompasses Big Businessmen, media moguls & editors, politicians, top policemen, etc.

As such, setting out on the nationalist road is a pretty thankless task because you are likely to sacrifice much for little gain, you are likely to be shafted by those you place your trust and loyalty in, and at the end of it the country will probably be no better than when you started.

So why do you, I and others do this thankless task, where if you don't do well people will point the finger and scream "failure" or if you do well the same people will point the finger and scream "egotist?"

There is the Truth of course.

Just because the Freemasons are in the ascendancy and seem to rule all today, it does not mean that we should walk away and surrender. Our own form of political guerrilla warfare, picking the time and place we fight, defending the truth and attacking the lies of a vast bloated enemy is important.

The Truth deserves to be defended no matter how popular or unpopular it is, no matter the vast scale of moral relativism, political vacuousness and the sheer greed and opportunism that surrounds us.

Every now and then you will find a fellow traveler, a kindred spirit, who has also discovered the truth and suffered the slings and arrows of a disingenuous hydra-esque enemy, and when you look into his or her eyes and see the same zeal for the truth, coupled with the humility to put the cause before personal benefit, and the ability to smile in adversity, then it all becomes worthwhile.

Furthermore if you are blessed in having a family, there is little that can be more satisfying in bringing up children to understand the truth, to know about history, to understand morality, to know right from wrong.

I can honestly say that, as an individual (not as a husband or dad) that visiting a comrade's house and being surrounded by children who are happy and healthy and brought up to be loyal to the truth and our traditions, it does lift the spirit.

How much more important is that than the banal posturing of some post-adolescent should-know-better ne'erdowell on some Channel 4 documentary about "nazis."

Yes, I have come through the "I'm gonna change the world" idealism of youth, I have seen leaders betray, I have seen 'comrades' stab-in-the-back and let loose a myriad of slanders, I have seen events twisted and false accusations fabricated; and doubtless in the perfect 20-20 vision of hindsight there are things I would have done differently, but truth be told there is little I would change drastically.

The key things for all nationalists of any age, IMHO are:

1. Be true to your beliefs. This goes beyond personalities, beyond parties or any other vehicles.
2. Hold fast to genuine comrades and friends. Even if some temporary spat might make you want to walk away from them, today's argument is tomorrow's talking-point.
3. Avoid shysters and con-men. You can usually spot them a mile off. They will offer you inducements, they will massage your ego, they will offer you key positions...
4. Keep a sense of humility. The loud voices and stirrers will undo themselves and probably won't be around in a few years. By all means defend your honour and what is right: but don't be drawn into the intricacies of those who are probably enemy plants in the cause.
5. Do not suffer attacks on the truth. Those who try to make the unacceptable acceptable should be confronted, openly, truthfully and in a spirit of charity. If your "superiors" attack you for it, you will know (sooner rather than later) that they place transitory matters before what is right.
6. You will be tempted to walk away. Don't. Count to 10. Take time off. Ultimately you have a duty. Whatever the reason, talk to those you trust.
7. Have fun. The cause should never be above a bit of a laugh. Some of my funniest memories are of my nationalist travels or events which had me in tears of laughter.

Above all realise that nationalism is only as good as the people in the cause and we all know some of their defects; but at the same time nationalism is a cause above and beyond the transitory membership and certainly not the property of any one leader, group, party or individual.

Read. Understand history. Understand tradition. Understand the banking swindle. Understand Freemasonry. Understand Zionism and its precursors. Understand the attacks upon the family.

When you understand all these things, when you have the bigger picture, when you can see back through history you will understand that you are just one person in a long history of victories and defeats, glories and ignominy, heroism and treachery, freedom and slavery.

Then you will understand that we do have the free will to accept the mantle of struggle and sacrifice, or to walk away and be materialist slobs, acquiescent in the destruction of the last remnants of Christendom.

That is the reality of the choice we face.

Make it. Decide between right and wrong.

You may not change the world, but as long as you change the character of your soul and remain loyal to the Truth, all else is secondary.

History is littered with those who sacrificed all and even paid the ultimate price for National Freedom and Social Justice, for Morality and Truth. Some barely knew anything other than betrayal, bitterness and defeat.

Be inspired by their example, keep your feet on the ground, keep a sense of humility and a sense of humour... and you will change far more than those who think they will "change the world."

Just an Old Fashioned Dad

Sorry everyone, one of my wee bairns (aka Candidate Cadres) has put me right (and not for the first time). Apparently shell suits are not the plate de jour these days in the circles that enjoy long-term Layaboutitis and severe Giromania.

Apparently it's track-suits these days: the difference may appear subtle to some, but I'm sure it does matter... to someone, and as regards my journalistic integrity (and isn't that an oxymoron!) I feel honour-bound to correct such a blatant and flagrant break of Blog etiquette.

Still, to many out there in Blogland, the irony of dole bums whose idea of a workout is smoking two spliffs in a row wearing any sporting apparel will not be lost.

Britain for the British??? Ha ha ha.

Ta-Da! This is the 200th Post of the FC Blog!

So a big thanks from me and Creagh1904 to all of you for your forbearance, patience and fortitude in sticking with this Blog, through all the rants, all the finger-pointing and all the navel-gazing.

Hopefully much of it has made some sense and even if it helps the patriot see through some of the smoke-screens and spin of our enemies, job done!

Anyway, onto today's point.


What was it I heard Gordon Brown say last week? Something about "BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS?"

It's funny that, because that's what NF activists used to paint on walls (there was a big slogan on a wall as the train pulled out of Cardiff Central Train Station for years - sadly faded and overgrown the last time I went by there) to the disdain of the multi-cultis, at the same time the Trade Unions were busy welcoming the mass immigration that deliberately undercut wages and lost the indigenous people jobs.

Perhaps this obscene sloganeering is all part of Brown's wish to appear attractive to "Middle England" and no longer the dour lefty 'Son of the Manse' Presbytarian Scot; though of course at the same time he's playing a game with Labour traditionalists of distancing himself from Iraq and the love-in which Tony Blair had with George W Bush.

All things to all men?

You betcha!

In a pastiche of the Private Eye "Prime Ministerial Decree" in which control-freak Brown is painted as an old-school Stalinist (after publicly being called the same by a civil servant), Brown even made reference to "full employment."

Which got the old grey matter ticking over. Really? Everyone in work? No jabbering immigrants or shell-suit brigade climbing out of bed midday to go cash their giro at the post office?

What kind of dream world is Comrade Brown living in?

Right: A Welsh worker thrown on the dole by Marks & Spencers decision to switch to buying Far East imports protests outside M&S - whose, like all good Capitalists, first loyalty is to profit.

But before I get onto that I was given a rude awakening and a glimpse of the truth when some kind radio commentator had the temerity to explain what full employment actually means.

He explained it meant 80% employment!

So 20% of the population is on the dole and Comrade Stalin... er Brown, says 'full employment' - was ever anything so obscenely twisted? Is Capitalism admitting that their is a constant underclass that will never work?

Anyone who lives in the real world - by which I mean those who don't live in the Westminster bubble, or who live halfway up a mountain admiring the views that their money has afforded them as they've chosen to flee the mess - knows that there are a large number of people who live on the dole, just as there are women who chose to have a one-parent "family" so they can get a free house, free income, free rent, free everything...

I hate to sound like a hard-hearted Colonel Buffinton-Smythe, but the fact is that what was supposed to be a safety net for the working man, so that his family needn't suffer months with no income (after families were forced from the land and self-sufficiency to mine, factory, workhouse and wage-slavery) has so obviously become a way-of-life for a type of person who expects eternal hand-outs.

We rightly moan about the immigrants who flood in and expect free housing, free healthcare, free schooling etc. and the millions in taxes that go to pay for it all.

We rightly complain about the banking swindle that creates servitude and high taxation for the working man.

But what politician will ever have the honesty to attack the immigrant offspring and the lazy indigenous deadbeats who choose to live life on the dole?

The dole (and its "free" housing) has become not only a lifestyle for a large swathe of people, but it is also a form of bribery by a class of politicians who are just as busy filling their boots with tax-pounds at the other end of the financial spectrum.


So we have:

1. A "socialist" Prime Minister with no back-tracking from Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) deals and privatisation by stealth.

2. A "socialist" PM who still hob nobs and is bank-rolled by the same corrupt tax-avoiding super-rich.

3. A "socialist" PM who plays footsie with the anti-War, anti-Zionist brigade whilst keeping troops in Iraq and Afghanistan (troops who are still dying).

4. A "patriot" PM who speaks of British Jobs for British Workers, who leaves the flood gates open, keeps up the pc anti-racist tirade, and basically changes little.

5. A "patriot" PM who says that immigrants "must speak English" when he knows that the vast number of African asylum seekers will have to do no such thing, and the huge number of Asian "family members" joining those already here will, again, have to do no such thing.

Oh this country is in a mess and we all know it.

Just this morning the Archbishop of Canterbury (Rev Dr. George Beardie) was on the radio condemning the rate of abortion in the country as out of control.

Every news bulletin shows a glimpse of the street crime, and growing gun crime (despite our strict gun laws) and our own eyes and ears tell us of increasing anti-social crime in our own communities.

So who will fix it?

The last thing we need is another "all things to all men" vacillating politician who spins headlines about "British Jobs" whilst doing nothing to stop Chinese power, debt and international Banking strength and increasing globalisation, or who plays at being against Zionist wars whilst keeping our troops in Iraq for insurgents to play target practice with.

To sum it all up one of the PM's new appointments in the "Age of Change" (yeah, right...) condemned spin tactics by the Tories this week.... just as Labour announced their new advertising campaign, handled by Saatchi.

Left: A Saatchi advert for Thatcher's Tories. If only we knew back then that 20% unemployed means "full employment."

Footnote: Lord Saatchi is that breed of uber-Capitalist Tory who would be eligible for Israeli citizenship and the "right of return" to Israel despite not being born there. Saatchi spearheaded Maggie Thatcher's successful election campaigns.

The more times change... etc.

Online Payments

It seems that our enemies have been at work again - we can no longer take payments direct through the FC Online Shop.

Those supporters, especially from overseas, who wish to avail themselves of our great range of merchandise - coupled with our fantastic 24 hour turnaround - can still pay by paypal.

If you wish to order from us, either use the paypal address you've used for FC in the last few months, or contact us for details.

Thanks for your support.

Pictured here are two of the newest flags we have in the FC Online Shop.

Saving the Planet

Andrew Marr's show is the political talking shop of a Sunday Morning on the BBC - and it delivered a gem this morning that proves exactly how shallow, vacuous, big business-driven this world is.

Oh we had the Tory (read rich son a rich Zionist) Zac Goldsmith telling us all how we can "save the planet" (copyright).

Why do the politicians tell us such things?

Just yesterday I ranted to the sprogs (much to their glee and to much applause) how the traitor politicians turn to "saving the planet" because they cannot even clean-up London (where most of them are based) of street-crime, drugs, burglary etc.

Why deal with the non-pc issues of today (beyond sound-bites and spin) when you can dreamily aspire to save the whole planet in the next 10 years???

It has all the substance and consistency of Prescott's plans for infrastructure, travel, the roads etc. had 10 years ago: i.e. lots of spin, no results, things will worsen etc., but it won't stop the politicos announcing great initiatives (usually announcing many of them several times over).

Back to the BBC's Andrew Marr Show though.

The best was still to come. Some non-entity actor came on (Mr. Who-He) about how he has started World Peace Day. Oh the tears flooded out back at the FC hovel.

He was a normal actor and realised one day that he wanted to change the world. (Can you hear the polite applause rippling across suburbia? Neither can I)

So what did he do? He approached the UN....

Oh yes - the UN. That bastion of humanistic bureaucracy!

So now we have a UN Day of Peace.

Stop selling guns Mr spook-backed big businessman! Stop torturing innocents Israel! Stop the extraordinary renditions America! Peace has arrived!!!

Cue the flowery music.

Then Andrew Marr turned to Annie Lennox (who's involved with the Peace thingy) and said "many people are cynical" when pop stars (for she is such) get involved.

"Yes, but if I wasn't involved this wouldn't happen" replied the aging Scots liberal in a typically pop-star's way, full of humility.

Then in the quickest and cheesiest topic-change in recent history, Marr intoned "so tell us about your latest album" and the BBC cut to a video of one of her songs.

Yes, we then had more minutes spent discussing Ms. Lennox's new album, her time with the Eurythmics (have I spelt that right? Do you care?) etc. ad nauseum.

World Peace was finished with. Presumably World Peace was delivered and "sorted" - and onto the far more serious business of shifting albums!

Ker-Ching!

I had tears in my eyes. Perhaps tears for the victims of vicious regimes murdered and tortured today - but moreso tears of laughter for Ms. Lennox and her Crusade to... flog her new album!

It was a treat to behold dear reader!

The postscript of that gem was our Home Secretary appearing on thew show to say that she was tackling immigration (pertinent after talking about crime, local services and house building).

"How so?" You ask. And I will tell you dear reader.

Our beloved Home Secretary Ms. Smith has started a quango on the path to producing a report on immigration's impact on local services...

Oh!!!! That's that "sorted" then.

What were we worried about???

What will the report deduce? That mass immigration (in the millions) does impact on housing, schools, hospitals etc.?

It might also discover that bears poop in forests and that the Bishop of Rome attends Mass!!!!

Still, by the time this body, this quango, this committee finally reports a few more million will be through the door and we'll move onto the next problem...

That's how politicos sweep news under the carpet.

Sir Humphrey eat your heart out!

Michael Easter expelled from the BNP?

I just received a text from a longtime BNP organiser friend who stated that Michael Easter has been expelled from the BNP.

It was rumoured for a few weeks that Easter had charges of financial mismanagement leveled against him (for not providing local account, receipts or similar).

I needn't mention that the national BNP hadn't delivered their accounts for a long time (in danger of being fined for it) or the kerfuffle over the (two) Solidarity Union(s) and the receipts and accounts mismanaged by an Executive member who then went off to form his own new version of the Union!

Some said Easter would be expelled and that the trumped up charges were a convenient smokescreen - no matter what defence he gave, because of his involvement in the democratic process of being the election agent of the BNP leadership challenger Chris Jackson, for which all involved were labelled "vermin" in the Blog of the BNP leader.

And so we see how democracy works... you are free to have your own opinions, only don't air them or you'll be expelled (remember how a sitting councilor was forced out recently, ostensibly for openly debating 911).

After the resignation of Jonathan Bowden over scurrilous attacks on his reputation (BNPer "loyalists" openly called him a paedophile on a website - an outright lie) and now this (Mr. Easter was, so I understand a founding member of the BNP) one has to wonder: who's next?

It's sad that nationalism has to be like this, after all one reader said after my post on the worship of "Choice" he was upset that this blog made so much sense yet continued to have a go at the BNP.

There is a dilemma there, because others in the BNP - including modernisers - often say "why don't you join the BNP" (often whilst belittling our efforts - either they want us or they don't!!!) but the sad fact is that a post like the one on Choice would see anyone expelled from the BNP (for anti-Semitism if nowt else) as well as condemned for being Christian extremists, pro-Muslim conspiracy cranks, Pro-Life extremists, anti-homosexual bigots and all the rest of the liberal mantra which seems to hold sway these days.

As a colleague said recently, when we see Bowden, Smith, Easter, the Edwardses, Newlands, Ebanks and the other myriad of intelligent people who have been dumped on by the BNP (primarily over issues linked with accounts and finance - not policy) one does tend to think "there but for the Grace of God go I..."

The debate will go on, of course, but as long as a nationalist party contains practicing known homosexuals, as long as a nationalist party soft-soaps on Israel and Zionism, as long as a nationalist party takes an unclear line on race-mixing and immigration... I and many others cannot give it our support.

To be honest even if we did, as "neo-Nazis, anti-Semites, bigots, political dinosaurs" and all the other pc buzz-words attached by liberals, how long before such support were thrown back in our face?

I'll ask Mr. Easter...

Pip pip!