The Liberal Disease

I think that Liberalism is a disease.

It wasn't always so: or at least not universally so.

In days gone by (read this in sepia tones) the liberals included a radical element, that sought to offer an alternative to the landed gentry, and thus offer some basic freedoms to the people.

Thus (before he saw through the charade and wrote his fascinating book The Party System - available from FC) we see Hilaire Belloc, the well-known Distributist author, Christian Social Teaching propagator and patriot, as a Liberal MP.

I suppose you might compare the situation 100 years ago with the early Labour Party which did contain some patriotic genuine anti-collectivist "socialists" who were sickened by the social injustice of Capitalism.

Such a thing would be unthinkable today as (socialists as well as) liberals (both the party political type and the other) are more likely to be found carrying banners for homosexual rights, free narcotics usage, abortion on demand and countless other policies of great detriment to the individual, the family, the community, the nation and (to use the old fashioned term so out of favour today) Christendom as a whole.

But do not, oh faithful and true reader, be fooled into thinking that liberalism is a cancer that dwells solely in the ranks of the Liberals Democrats and sister parties across the world.

Tut tut.

Were that it were so.

We might have some kind of self-contained asylum. We might point at liberals through the bars and laugh at their nonsensical gibberings and sudden anarchic movements of limb - as the monied idle rich used to tour Bedlam 150 years ago in some kind of morbid fascination.

Oh look at Menzies Campbell tweaking the straps on Charlie Kennedy's straight jacket! Oh yes. Hours of fun.

No, oh fellow beacon of fidelity in these tiresome and treacherous times, sadly the liberal canker has entered the entire body politic to some degree or another.

We have seen this in recent times with the Labour and Tory Parties moving evermore to the quagmire of the Centre Ground and the ejection of ideology in favour of Presentation Politics.

Yes yes... I know Bill Clinton was a philandering degenerate who could barely keep his pecker under wraps - but didn't he have lovely well coiffured hair?

OK. I'm being the ultimate pedant, but you understand what I mean. How often have you heard some brain dead moron say about (as just one example) Blair:

I don't like what Tony Blair did in regards to Iraq - but he comes across so well and looks like "a pretty straight kinda guy."

As if any of that means anything. Blair appeared in shirt sleeves with a mug of tea and somehow we're all supposed to think that illegal wars, mass murder and conspiracy to loot a nation is acceptable because he tells us he's "a pretty straight kinda guy."

If he is "a straight kinda guy" then Peter Tatchell should be the next Archbishop of Canterbury!

Zoiks.

So we have a situation where most of the three main parties are moving to this grey mishmash "centre ground politics."

People lose interest in politics as they all rush to defend multi-racism.

Oh yes "gay rights" (sic) are the order of the day!

Abortion is an accepted part of society.

The banks and debt are not to be debated.

Social control, big brother, police state... all are implemented by fits and starts.

The EU - with all its larger scale corruption, nepotism, missing accounts - is accepted.

There is no real debate any more.

The only difference is the speed of change on various issues, from immersion in the EU to rights for degenerate faggots.

All we get is smoke and mirrors, bread and circuses... TV sound byte news is proffered to us and we are all meant to clap, moan or tut tut quietly whilst resolving to put another X in a box next time around.

As if putting another politician, chosen behind Lodge doors in the den of treachery (to mirror the den of iniquity that is the Bank of England) in the palace of Westminster, in the place of a similar one will make the blindest bit of difference!

The politicians wonder why the voters are losing interest! We are aware that they are all the same: all treacherous money-grubbing, treacherous, selfish, arrogant scumbags surrounded by their cronies and filling their pockets while they can.

And so we get elections were the man with the best suit or haircut wins the seat.

And so my third vomit bucket nears the rim!

And what of nationalism?

Sadly nationalism isn't free of this festering sore.

I was reading someone's post on a forum the other day. Yes an internet forum, where the keyboard warrior reigns supreme and the faeces-stirrers employ all their double-meaning verbiage to excuse the inexcusable and employ character assassination against anyone just and true.

I caught one short post by one chap against one liberal poster and I thought it most apt.

In two short sentences he said (and this isn't verbatim):

'Your language defending homosexuality and your posts defending race-mixing speak volumes. You are not a nationalist and you don't belong on this forum.'

The forum is supposed to be or Racial Nationalists, and the 'liberal' in question is oft seen defending the Kosher-Tory policy as dictated b y the pocket-filling upper echelons of the BNP.

Seeing so-called nationalists repeating the lies of the faggot lobby, of the Zionist lobby, of the integrationists and so on ad nauseum really is incredible - and sometimes you have to pinch yourself because it all seems so unreal.

And why? For votes?

And so we end up with another party under the control of the bankers, the Freemasons, saying the same old lies about homosexuality, the same old lies about Israel, the same old "power of nightmares" CIA/Mossad lies.

A friend sent an e-mail to me the other day. It came from a comrade who, until recently, was in the leadership circle of the BNP but who had, quite frankly had enough of the Chinese water Torture of liberalisation: drip, drip, drip...

He sent a poem which went along the lines of:

First they came for the Tyndallites,
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Tyndallite.

Then they came for those who wanted account transparency,
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't asking for account transparency.

Then they came for the Skinheads,
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Skinhead.

Then they came for the Revisionists...
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Revisionist.

Then they came for the Anti-Zionists...
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't an Anti-Zionist.

Then finally they came for me...

OK, it's a fun piece, but it does go some way to show how creeping liberalism is infecting every part of the political process.

Just a few years ago if someone said a nationalist org would have a leading member publicly making excuses for homosexuals, Zionists etc. I'd think him mad.

Third Way tried it in the late 90s to no avail. I remember one article they wrote about a by-election count when they poured scorn on the BNP officials present for staying clear from an Asian woman. The Third Way writer said he, unlike the BNP, would be more likely to chat her up...

Ahem.

and so we see Liberalism come full circle within nationalism.

The NF all but split in 1989 over nationalists making overtures to Zionists. Nick Griffin and others were having none of it and left the NF.

The pro-Zionist remnant became Third Way. Now Third Way have linked up with the (Nick Griffin led) pro-Zionist BNP and so there seems a meeting of the ways with those elements who believe that Jews and non-Whites are "Britons" or who want to take a more liberal line on homosexuality and Zionism...

It may appeal to those voters who like a nice short back and sides, and appreciate canvassers in nice suits: but it doesn't sit well with nationalists who actually believe in nationalism.

Whoever said the more things change the more they stay the same?

Seems as though, for the moment at least, we'll still have to watch the antics of the liberal inmates.

Just don't stick your fingers through the bars!