Belgian Reds get Accosted by Muslims

In this video we see Muslims go up against Communists, in Brussels.

Cor blimey guvnor it's like Afghanistan 1980 all over again.

What was it the militant lefty Mensi once sang about the Hammer and Sickle being fickle?

And is that a poof banner behind the Muslims? It's all getting a bit panto mate! "They're behind you!"

I always wonder why Communists back 'queer rights' when faggotry was always a disease of the idle rich - mind you so was Marxism.

I've answered me own question! Apples and pears!

Muslims Give Antifa Anarchists a Beating in Sweden

Before the usual brain-dead trolls start up, this are not our videos and their editorial content is not ours.

Got that? Has it sunk in? Good. Then we can get on...

These vids show the Antifa getting a beating from the very immigrants they claimed to want an open door policy for.

You see, Mr Antifa, whatever banners you wave, you are still white men. And when that mugger holds a knife to your throat as your girlfriend is raped, all the bleating about multi-culturalism and "smash the fash" is not going to save you.

Sweet dreams!



and without subtitles:

An Illegal Immigrant and a State Breaking Ancient Laws

He's an ILLEGAL Immigrant. Simples.

The argument over Abu Qatada is all the fault of liberalism and a failed multi-racial immigration policy.

He is an illegal immigrant. He should not be in this country. He should have been turned back on Day One. But like countless (literally!) other illegal immigrants he was allowed in, and immediately gets hand-outs.

He has not (so we are told) broken any laws since his illegal arrival and the state locked him up because his thoughts are deemed dangerous.

So let us analyse this:

• His very presence here is illegal (a costly mistake as he, like others, receives state handouts).
• The state is locking up those it disagrees with, without stating what law they have broken.

Both of those should worry nationalists - because the former means the politicians are traitors, letting in hundreds of thousands of non-Europeans each year (against our wishes), yet when the dangerous ones are spotted they then tweak the law to lock up people on a pretext.

Now I do not support "militant Islam" before the Neo Con trolls start up. I am a White Christian Nationalist. I do not believe in coloured immigration. I believe Europe should be Christian in its entirety (as Belloc said "Europe is the Faith, the Faith is Europe").

However, the fact the the state is locking up Muslims (rather than just stopping the entry of all non-Europeans) means that one day they will be more than capable of doing this to nationalists.

Far fetched? Many/most "terror attacks" are false flag operations. Many "extremist" Muslims are in the pocket of the CIA/Mossad (just as top IRA people were in the pocket of the British state).

All it takes is one false flag op, one paid-idiot to spout crap about "sending 'em home in body bags" and we could easily see nationalists who have spoken out against coloured immigration, multi-culturalism locked up for "hate speech."

That is why nationalists need to be intelligent. By all means oppose Abu Qatada. Oppose his Islamism. Oppose his very presence here. But please do not be (Neo) Conned into supporting an illegal act of government which flies in the face of Magna Carta, the Law and Natural Justice.

If the government had any cajones it would stick him on the first plane home, as it should have done x number of years ago, just as it should with all illegal immigrants.

Illegal = Criminal.

But their liberalism means he stays here, and so they think up new 'powers' for themselves to whisk people off the streets for their thoughts and ideas and bang them up indefinitely.

If a piece from this blog is one day found in the home of some Mossad-paid nutter who shoots or blows up blacks, Muslims, queers or whoever, they could come for me because they will say I am a "hater" and helped "inspire" Mr. Nutter (despite the fact that Third Positionists have always categorically condemned terrorism as morally unacceptable and tactically misjudged). But we all know how the government, media and various pressure groups work.

When the TP has had various centres, in this country and abroad, the Mossad-mouthpieces, media etc. have always parroted phrases such as "terrorist training camps" when they were anything but. A surprise visit would garner more books, families, games of football etc. then even a fish filleting knife. But that doesn't stop the media, the Mossad crowd and others - because they believe a lie oft repeated is a lie believed.

So please do oppose Abu Qatada in your writings, actions and conversations. But do not support the illegal actions of a (Zionist, multi-racist, anti-nationalist) state that could one day be used against law-abiding citizens who disagree with government policy.

Let's not make slaves of ourselves to cover up the ridiculously liberal immigration policy of a failed and treacherous system.

When All Seems Lost... Change We Can Believe in

The Spanish did it!

We can do it!

We too, like the Spaniards, must make ours a Holy Crusade.

Like the Spaniards we must root out the Talmudic fifth column.

Let the Reconquest begin.

Liberals Want Blasphemy - French Students Say Non

Bravo to the Thought and Action blog for publicising the French Catholics who are fighting against the Marxist/Talmudic filth attacking Christ.

It's interesting that the Muslims are supporting the Catholic students - even though they know that the students want France to be 100% Christian. It is the usual Judeo-Masonic forces that approve of attacks on our traditions (remember Jerry Springer the Musical?) especially because they hold Christ in utter contempt.

Isn't it amazing that we are supposed to allow all manner of filth in the name of 'free speech' and yet as soon as someone suggest that, for example, homosexuality is an evil, or that multi-racism is wrong -- they face arrest, the sack, and the hatred of those who claim to be liberals.

GK Chesterton said that in a topsy turvey society the traditionalist is revolutionary, and so it is today. Those who sculpt "art" out of faeces get polite applause from media luvees, those who say England should be Christian and, er, English - face blind hatred.

C'est la guerre.

BNP and EDL: Opponent Spells Out His Warped Vision of Current Affairs

Beware: this video contains some bad language:



This makes for an interesting video. The bloke is quite amusing, but twists the facts somewhat.

He knows that the media and the establishment can twist facts. Otherwise why would most Sun readers/Eastenders watchers think that our intervention in Libya was about saving lives and helping a group of people after "democracy."

He also knows that the media can "cover" a story, the equivalent of putting it on page 23, or publicise it by giving it prominence. Ipso facto how many people think that the (pro-Zionist) EDL's boss was in jail?

He is also being more than economical with the facts if he thinks an arrest for assault and then a ban from attending political rallies is not political. As ex-West London NF leader Phil Andrews found out to his cost in the 80s, one can be arrested for violence on little or no evidence. As for banning someone from specific political rallies - that is in reality being a political prisoner.

Don't even begin on the Zionist control of the media. That has been well documented and has nothing to do with the presenters and journalists. The American media especially is almost entirely Zionist owned. Only a fool would say otherwise. Various Jewish individuals have written about this, because they are proud of it (not to have a pop) therefore these facts are not the figment of anyone's imagination, not least people like the EDL boss who is very pro-Israel.

This chap also ignores the minutiae of the British media, in which multi-culti liberalism plays a huge part. So whilst the "Zionists" will appreciate a street movement that pushes the patriotic types toward Israeli policy (a road first trod by Mr Griffin), the liberal media will not want to promote the EDL boss's loss of liberty, just for addressing a political rally (even if it was a pro-Israeli one and he was dressed as a rabbi).

When dealing with the secret state, the media and suchlike, one is not dealing (if you'll excuse the pun) in black and white. This chap knows that of course, unless he is a complete arse. Think of Northern Ireland where the state has assets in Loyalist and Republican groups, even if some might simplify that situation to say the Loyalists were pro-British State and the Republicans were anti-British State. This would not stop the State from having assets in both, saying different things, pushing in various directions. Some may be promoted by the media, some ignored, depending on the ideology of the reporters, depending on the State policy at that time, and 101 other permutations.

So enjoy the video. The bloke is amusing. But don't be fooled. The BNP is likely to fold. It has certainly already collapsed. Another safety valve will come to the fore. It may be the EDL, it may be some other grouping.

The main picture to keep in mind is that the world financial system is usurious and run by the Rothschilds and their lieutenants. The political system is Masonic and the left/right dichotomy is in the pockets of the bankers. The mass media is controlled and will never defend the interests of the people.

Whatever simple idiots like this might say, we are just sheep paying taxes and having our rights taken away and our birth-right ripped from us. Democracy is a sham under the control of international financiers - the New Unhappy Lords that GK Chesterton warned us about and AK Chesterton wrote in-depth about.

In the years in between things have worsened.

Mass immigration, homosexual "rights," out of control abortion, war after unjustified Zionist war, drugs rampant, usury that has put billions out of work, taxation that is rapacious (mostly to pay uncontrollable usury-debt), an EU into which money is poured as in into a bottomless pit, and many other evils in which none of us had a say.

Democracy is a joke. Were our fathers asked in the 40s if millions of non-Whites should be allowed in? And on all the other issues above, we've been lied to, facts have have been twisted, and the controlled mass media has been used to con us all.

"Anti-racists" are like the peaceniks of the 60s. They are today's "useful idiots." But instead of being the 'useful idiots' of the USSR with its gulags full of Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc., they are the 'useful idiots' of those who wish to enslave the world because they are set out to destroy all nationality, all national pride that allows peoples to stand as-one in defiance of destruction and slavery (whether the native Indians of the Americas or the white Christian communities of Europe).

Once we lose our nationalism, our sense of patriotism, our belief that we are rooted in the land (blood and soil) that our forefathers worked, defended and lived on, then we lose the will to defend that land from the New Unhappy Lords: the EU Commissioners, the Rothschilds, the media moguls and all who seek to turn us into coffee coloured, brain-dead, tax-slaves too busy singing 'One World' anthems to see that we are mice in the laboratory of the mega-rich banksters who own the world through the creation of usury-debt.

Remember your traditions. Hold fast to the Faith of your fathers. Stand firm on the soil on which they toiled and bled. Defend the family with all your might.

We all have a duty to fight. We can fight in our daily lives. Fight in the way we bring up our children. Fight in the way we spread our ideas and educate others.

To not fight is to accept slavery and join the unthinking drones who do not see the Rothschild puppet masters controlling the rent-boy politicians.

Freedom or slavery? The choice is quite easy isn't it?

Time for the BNP to Apologise for 10 Years of "Muslim" Mania

There was a time when those embarking on their Neo-Con lite ideological adventure, in the BNP and similar, would condemn David Duke. Not for his many or perceived shortfalls, but for his perceived "Anti-Semitism" (sic).

Now with the killings in Norway he, like those of us who have warned about cosying up to the Israeli Lobby in any way,shape or form (and especially its court journalists), have been proved right, and even the BNP is trying to distance itself from the Zionists.

But like a fat bloke with bits of pie in his beard, the BNP have been seen (to mix metaphors) quaffing at the poisoned chalice proffered by the Zionists, and it's too late now to shriek with horror, hold their hands up and pretend to the world that they "knew the score."

Remember their London mayoral leaflet asking Jews to vote for them because they were the only force opposed to Islamo-fascism? remember all the articles, blogs, chat rooms, forums etc. in which BNP activists went on and on and on (and on!) about Islam? The Zionists nary got a look in, except of course for when those same BNP activists were linking through to the Zionists own sites, pages and blogs decrying the takeover of the world by... Islam.

What a cosy little circle it was. And you got the feeling that as long as the BNP went down this quasi-Zionist, civic patriot (hug a coloured), "it's space not race" alleyway, they would get an easy ride from the media.

Now of course, like some kind of spoof Private Eye column apologising for what was last week's certainty but is this week's apocalyptic omen, the BNP is out and about (to us lot, not to the public, of course) decrying Zionism and the nuttiness of those who screech long and loud against those opposed to Israel.

The Norway killings got them freaked, because the way the BNP was going on and on and on (and on!) about Muslims this and Muslims that (whilst Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and other exotically-owned banks took us to the brink of disaster, not to mention got millions thrown on the dole), it was not inconceivable that one of the young and impressionable sort that pays his pocket money into the Trafalgar Club so the Chairman can get cocktails on his hols, would do something stupid and attack said enemies of the "the West" or those who support them.

Our labour party is detestable. It is led by rich exotic types (Mandelson, Milliband, Straw) and would never dare to criticise Israel, but the Norwegian Labour Party (which is in power) is very outspoken in its opposition to Israeli terror and moreover in support of a Palestinian homeland.

As we saw in an earlier post, to Zionist nutters this is all but a declaration of war, and even after the dreadful murders they have been saying 'they deserved it because...' whilst seeking to justify mass murder because those killed did not bow and scrape to Israel.

What warped, twisted, evil people these are. And these are the kind of "anti-Jihadists" Zionist activists that groups like the BNP and EDL have been playing footsie with, promoting their sites on the net and using their twisted logic to push criticism away from the Masonic-Zionist run/controlled banks, media, government and police -- the forces that are REALLY screwing us, our people, our communities, our lands - our children.

It is time for groups like the BNP to stop bandying words. Come out in outright opposition to Organised Zionism. Quit the blaming Muslims for everything. Islam (and coloured immigration) is a small symptom of the malaise (and Muslim terror is a direct result/end of CIA/Mossad terror groups/provocateurs).

Stand up and defend your land! The banks,. media, politicians and police have been found to be corrupt, self-serving, bankrupt (in every sense) and in it for themselves.

The Muslims have nothing to do with the mess we are in. drop the stupid policies that focus on them. It is a Neo-Con sideshow and a waste of everyone's time. Apologise to Nationalists for wasting their time, money and efforts.

Post "911" (Dear Lord I hate that term!) you have wasted 10 years chasing Neo Con phantoms down blind alleyways, and now you have even frittered away the crumbs that fell off the establishment's table.

The Zionists are the enemies of civilisation. End of. They run the system that betrayed our people. They control the banks that bleed our people dry. They bribe/threaten the politicians. They own the media. They run the police through the Lodges.

Time to face the facts. OK, you won't get an easy ride, but you'll have your honour intact, and who knows - with the commotion going on in the world (e.g., America nearly defaulting) it could be White Christian patriots who are "radicalised" into realising what is what and who is who.

Please... even when Mossad do their next false flag op to garner support for their terrorist state, drop the mantra that blames Muslims for all our ills. It is wrong, childish and potentially dangerous.

Let us be honest and gain kudos for that. In the light of the terror attacks in Norway, we owe it to our own people to explain why it happened, who is responsible and why Nationalism is OPPOSED 100% to that nefarious, war-mongering usurious creed.

---

As a P.S. might we also mention the pro-homosexual nature of the Zionists? The Norwegian murderer condemned Nationalist groups for (like Muslims) opposing homosexuality. The Zionist cause is ultimately pro-homosexual because it hates our civilisation, our Christian heritage and there is none more anti-Christian and anti-family than the homosexual militant mob and the degenerates they stir up.

For years now (again for an easy ride) too many nationalists have tried to take a "middle of the road" stance. No good. We must be open and oppose homosexuality - for the harm it does the homosexuals themselves, for the damage it does to their health, for the damage it does to communities in destroying the family, for the damage it does nations in attacking Christianity and promoting drugs, filth and smut, and for the damage it does in bringing down the birthrate of European nations.

Nationalists should be unashamed in opposing - with sound reason and genuine charity not least for the victims of the homosexual death-cult - homosexuality and the rabid militants who promote it with all their twisted statistics, pushing filth at schoolchildren and council funding for all manner of sick activities (all of which, well documented by groups such as the Christian Institute, make the News of the World imbroglio look like a picnic in the park).

7/7 Ripple Effect: Justice Versus Secret State

The stories of 911 and 7/7 are unravelling as fast as the JFK, Dr David Kelly and Osama Bin Laden stories.

This is why the "patriot" movements who try to screech "it's all the muzzies," like the BNP and EDL are (whether they like it or not) part of the con. They are a small ingredient in the Neo Con/Zionist/Israel Lobby recipe.

Right: The BNP & EDL prove that Muslims are taking over America.

Their job was to keep the white working class (still a sizable proportion of the British population) bumbling along, blaming the Muslims for all their ills.

We were dragged into foreign wars. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.
The banks dragged us to the edge of total ruination. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.
The politicians filled their pockets as we were taxed to the hilt. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.

The world is falling apart. The very many woes affecting us (including immigration) are the work of the Masonic-Zionist elite, and that same elite are playing the BNP/EDL (and whoever comes along next) so that we as nationalists never pose a risk to their policies.

The Muslims have been here for 40 odd years, give or take. They have been the government/media enemy for the last 20 odd years, give or take.

Do you, nationalist, really think we had no problems before this time? Do you think our people lived in freedom before this time?

Wake up.

The Muslim issue is just a very small part of a much bigger problem, and the elites behind those problems (the oligarchs, the fat cats, the media moguls, the big businessmen, the politicos etc.) are of the same Masonic-Zionist elite; that is why the family, Christianity, nationalism etc. have been under attack for so long.

Nick Griffin still Twitters incessantly about the Muslims. It is boring. It is futile. It is treacherous.

The Masonic-Zionist elite are pulling the strings. Watch the marionettes dance.

Link:
7/7 Ripple Effect VICTORY

911: The Lesson for All Patriots

I like reading Peter Hitchens column in the Mail on Sunday. He isn't always right, but he's about as close as it gets in the mainstream media. He loathes the Marxist and PC left, but he is equally as angry about the hand-wringing or Big Business right.

In today's column he all but says Osama Bin Laden wasn't behind the Twin Towers. There is only one way we can follow that. That Osama was a patsy - a willing put-up baddie by the CIA/Mossad etc. Or he was willing to take on that mantle to build his org into the No. 1 Muslim terror group (a useful idiot).

Either way he did what the Neo Cons, the NWO, the Zionists wanted.

Remember who the only people in New York celebrating were: the group of Israeli special forces with their rental van, later stopped and arrested after sniffer dogs detecting explosives - and later released quietly by George Dubya.

It all stinks to high heaven.

What else could the Zionists want but a perfect bogeyman to yell "it was us?"

Hitchens gets it wrong when he blames the Palestinians for cheering. After all, the Americans had blocked umpteen UN Resolutions against Israel which resulting in many tens of thousands of Palestinians dying - not to mention those tortured, maimed etc.

The Americans think their 3000 odd victims of 911 is a watershed. Not for the Palestinians it wasn't. They had lost that many people many times over to State sponsored terror, only for the American government to block any UN Resolutions. They also are not blind to the fact that much of the weaponry was bought with US tax-payers funds, poured into Israel.

Reverse those facts and don't you think the Americans would cheer a strike on Palestine? They sure cheered when the CIA bogeyman was (allegedly!) taken-out...

Our problem in the West is thinking that "our" victims of terror (even if we accept the terror is Islamic and not Zionist) are worth more to us, than the dead Arabs slaughtered by Zionist terror mean to the Arabs.

If our people were murdered, tortured, expelled, imprisoned in concentration camps, denied water etc. as much as the Palestinians do you not think we would rise up against our oppressors?

When we hear of Churchill's "stay behind" Resistance Fighters in secret hide-outs, armed to take out German invaders; even after a surrender -making such Resistance illegal under the Geneva Convention: would most people consider such people terrorists? Or freedom fighters?

So how do you think most Arabs look on those who struggle against a Zionist machine that has murdered hundreds of thousands, with the financial, material and political backing of America, the last Super-power?

Hitchens thinks 911 can be traced back to Palestine in that the Muslim perpetrators urged the end of injustice to the Palestinians. I think it can indeed be traced back to Palestine -- because prior to 911 Bush had said he wanted to be less involved in foreign wars (can you imagine?) and the Middle East. He was all but saying he was going to cut Israel loose.

Join the dots folks:

• Bush wants to 'pull out' of the Mid East.
• 911 Happens.
• Zionist Special Forces in NY witnessed celebrating.
• Osama (CIA) Says "It was us Muslims"
• Neo Cons step up pressure.
• Zionist Wars ensue.
• Various anti-Israeli opponents are taken out.
• "War on Terror" follows Zionist agenda.

So in short, America went from being a State that would no longer prop up Israel to the extent it had, would try to sort out its internal policies, problems etc. and not act as the world's policeman, to being at the head of Zionist policy in the Middle East and the Arab world.

Always ask: who benefits. Cui Bono?

By any stretch of the imagination the Twin Towers outrage benefits Israel, Israeli policy, the Zionist Lobby in the USA and the Neo Cons agenda overseas.

Right: Another dead Palestinian. Killed by US-backed Israel.

With the facts coming out about 911, the facts coming out about Osama, and the way world policy shifted afterwards, it is an idiot who says "911 was the Muslims."

Think about it. After 911 even the BNP grew in popularity (and media exposure!) after becoming the Anti-Muslim party. Now their usefulness is past, they are being disrupted (who is to blame you can work out for yourself). Some people made money, played the "it's all the Muslims" card and now nationalism has been wrecked (again).

Every part of the 'War on Terror' campaign was planned down to the minutest detail. It may not have all gone to plan, but it wasn't for lack of trying.

People like Hitchens are off kilter, primarily because they are too afraid to add 2 + 2. It would upset too many people. He would lose his job. He would be labeled an anti-Semite (the killer blow).

That is how the media works. And who runs the media? A handful of oligarchs who follow the Zionist line.

Democracy? Chose your poison.

Osama - The Story Unravels in Days

Osama used "his wife" as a human shield.

No. It wasn't his wife.

Er... she wasn't shielding him.

Obama watched the whole thing on video.

Er no... there was a 25 minute 'black out' for the time of the assault.

This thing is unravelling faster than the JFK "lone sniper" official story.

The evidence was "dumped at sea" faster than JFK's autopsy was stopped and the brain removed.

Yes. Democracy marches on!

Next bogeyman please.

If Osama was murdered (and it wasn't a stand-in for an already dead bogeyman) was this the murder of an asset a la Lee Harvey Oswald?

Obama: The Gullibility of Americans

Osama bin Laden’s Second Death By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24587

Global Research, May 2, 2011

If today were April 1 and not May 2, we could dismiss as an April fool’s joke this morning’s headline that Osama bin Laden was killed in a firefight in Pakistan and quickly buried at sea. As it is, we must take it as more evidence that the US government has unlimited belief in the gullibility of Americans. Think about it. What are the chances that a person allegedly suffering from kidney disease and requiring dialysis and, in addition, afflicted with diabetes and low blood pressure, survived in mountain hideaways for a decade? If bin Laden was able to acquire dialysis equipment and medical care that his condition required, would not the shipment of dialysis equipment point to his location? Why did it take ten years to find him? Consider also the claims, repeated by a triumphalist US media celebrating bin Laden’s death, that “bin Laden used his millions to bankroll terrorist training camps in Sudan, the Philippines, and Afghanistan, sending ‘holy warriors’ to foment revolution and fight with fundamentalist Muslim forces across North Africa, in Chechnya, Tajikistan and Bosnia.” That’s a lot of activity for mere millions to bankroll (perhaps the US should have put him in charge of the Pentagon), but the main question is: how was bin Laden able to move his money about? What banking system was helping him? The US government succeeds in seizing the assets of people and of entire countries, Libya being the most recent. Why not bin Laden’s? Was he carrying around with him $100 million dollars in gold coins and sending emissaries to distribute payments to his far-flung operations? This morning’s headline has the odor of a staged event. The smell reeks from the triumphalist news reports loaded with exaggerations, from celebrants waving flags and chanting “USA USA.” Could something else be going on? No doubt President Obama is in desperate need of a victory. He committed the fool’s error or restarting the war in Afghanistan, and now after a decade of fighting the US faces stalemate, if not defeat. The wars of the Bush/Obama regimes have bankrupted the US, leaving huge deficits and a declining dollar in their wake. And re-election time is approaching. The various lies and deceptions, such as “weapons of mass destruction,” of the last several administrations had terrible consequences for the US and the world. But not all deceptions are the same. Remember, the entire reason for invading Afghanistan in the first place was to get bin Laden. Now that President Obama has declared bin Laden to have been shot in the head by US special forces operating in an independent country and buried at sea, there is no reason for continuing the war. Perhaps the precipitous decline in the US dollar in foreign exchange markets has forced some real budget reductions, which can only come from stopping the open-ended wars. Until the decline of the dollar reached the breaking point, Osama bin Laden, who many experts believe to have been dead for years, was a useful bogyman to use to feed the profits of the US military/security complex.

The Problem of the BNP and Kosher Patriotism

Peter Hitchens writes of David Cameron:

The Prime Minister is an opportunist who doesn’t believe in anything...

It’s easily proved, by tracking his changing views on any subject you care to name since he first sought office. Zig, zag, and zig again where necessary.

But don’t delude yourself that a man with no principles won’t do any damage. Because his only concern is to gain and hold office, he will do all he can for that end.

And that, dear reader, is the problem the BNP has been in. First lurching into what is now called "civic nationalism," then veering back into racial nationalism; then seeking black supporters and members, then fighting against black members; then seeking to be pro-Israeli, then trying to look anti-Zionist... Under Nick Griffin the BNP has (supposedly) believed in one then the other.

The flip-flop nature of the BNP over the last decade has been painful to behold.

Right: Sikh and ye shall find. A tame Sikh joins the civic nationalist BNP - which now attacks other patriotic groups for being, er, civic nationalist.

And so we have Eddy Butler pointing out to us all where the BNP has gone wrong, and what must be done (to nationalism!) to make it right again.

On the money, he's right. From the firing of Dave Newlands back in 1999 (? correct me if I'm wrong) the BNP has been out of control with no financial controls, a relative fiefdom - and some have questioned if that were a "reward" for the u-turns on repatriation, coloured supporters, Zionism and more.

But on the politics?

Funnily enough Mr. Butler and the other 'voices in the wilderness' were until recently fully in the Griffin camp, whilst the Trafalgar Club slush fund was raided and whilst the policy flip flops went on... It is only really since the advent of Jim Dowson, with the millions of pounds raised and the subsequent debts (which left Butler and others asking where all the money went) which has led to rupture.

Griffin Watch, one of the net's most vociferous critics of the BNP's policy and finances has warned that Butler's differences are not, in essence, political and I would tend to agree. In and of itself there is nothing wrong with that. As long as people know where he stands!

To give an example, Mr. Butler recently ran a couple of articles exposing Mr. Griffin's past. It was meant to shock and awe the current crop of BNP activists and supporters. What it actually did was expose the old Griffin (radical, ideologue, racialist and nationalist - even if off the back of others) when compared to the new Griffin (money-intensive, flip-flop, EU-waged politician).

The comments on his Condemned to Repeat 2 post were most interesting, because it seems that even today nationalists (BNP and otherwise) are not taken in by Zionist lies and propaganda: they are prepared to read and understand articles about anti-Zionist governments, about foreign nationalisms and about potential allies outside Europe.

One of the issues with the Modern BNP (under Griffin and including Butler) has been that it has thought that following a vaguely pro-Israeli line has been a money-spinner, a vote-winner, a media-placating and positive move. What they fail to understand is that being pro-Israel (even with caveats) rips the guts out of nationalist activists, because they instinctively and intrinsically know that nationalism has always denounced Israel and Zionism.

I am reminded of the time this very blog put up a "Love Palestine" banner with a link through to a site exposing Zionist war crimes etc. Some Nu-BNP braindead moron put a story up on a forum (Stormfront I think) on how FC was "pro-Muslim." And that, my friends, is the level of twit we are dealing with, and that is the zombie-moron bred when groups like the BNP become Muzzie-bashing pro-Israeli pressure groups.

Mr. Butler has exposed many wrongs in the BNP, mostly financial, and in that respect will be proved correct in the not too distant future when the pigeons come home to roost.

Left: The "Jews are voting for us" BNP have now been overtaken by the pro-Israeli EDL, and so denounce them as "Zionist." Pots? Kettles?

However, as his attempt to "dirty" Griffin with his Libyan links shows, Mr. Butler is misfiring. He would do better to condemn and expose Mr. Griffin's cosying up to the Israeli lobby and the betrayal of nationalism that took place at that time. Unfortunately he can't because Mr. Butler was one of NG's lieutenants at that time and politically is of the same ilk.

The finance scandals will probably see NG hoisted high and left to dry. The political ones won't, because there are still plenty around who feel that the betrayals of the last 10 years have to be continued...

Nationalism still has much to suffer.

Who Are 'We' Bankrolling in Libya?

Who are "we" supporting? Who are "we" acting as path-finders for?

Has America learnt no lessons?

American Zionist Hypocrites: the Dissatisfied Will Rise in the USA too

Now the usual suspects will screech about this video appearing on this site.

MAKE YOUR OWN MIND UP.

Listen to his words.

If only we had a White, Christian leader like this, instead of weasels and hypocrites too afraid to upset the Israeli Lobby and their compliant media.

We may not agree with everything Farrakhan stands for (though we should learn to respect Black Separatists -- I would always prefer them to integrationist coconuts who want to join the BNP and be "proud Brits"), but he speaks a lot of sense.

When Americans rebel against their government, will the slugs in Washington DC back down, declare a cease fire and give the rebels their own land, where they can keep their arms and run their own affairs? Or will they do another Waco, Ruby Ridge etc.?

Farrakhan is right to point out America's hypocrisy over Gaza and Lebanon.

Sadly at the time those conflicts were happening, leading BNPers were supporting Israel!

Shame on them.

I would rather listen to Farrakhan than the Kosher words of a White traitor selling out for Zionist shekels any day of the week.

I believe most White Separatists, Nationalists and Patriots would too. We have our differences, sure. But his racial separatism and his anti-Zionism means he talks a lot of sense. It's a shame he's a Muslim... but you can't have everything handed to you on a plate!

Just as with David Duke, the man himself may have his shortfalls, we may even disagree on certain things, but when a message is powerful and correct, we have a duty to listen and tell others.

American Neo-Con Terrorism via Martin Sheen

The film 'Unthinkable' is worth watching.




This is one of the best scenes in it, in which the Muslim terrorist exposes American Neo-Con hypocrisy.

Of course, as we all learnt on our mum's knee, two wrongs don't make a right. Just because the Zionists/Neo Cons kill hundreds of thousands of innocents, does not make the murder of one innocent by its opponents justified.

What I find interesting is that we have had Hollywood films about Christian terrorists attacking American targets, we have had Hollywood films about Muslim terrorists attacking American targets. Yet we have yet to have had a mainstream Hollywood film about Jewish terrorists attacking American targets. Despite there being evidence of all three (state-sponsored or otherwise).

I wonder why?

Why do the Media and Politicians Lie About the Threats we Face?

Successive governments of every hue have told us that the protection of our citizens is number one priority.

That is why, we are informed, that it was so vital that we take part in the newspeak "War on Terror."

Right: "Can we watch multi-culti, pro-homosexual Eastenders after the news Dad?"

Never mind that it could be argued that our taking on the Israeli-American foreign policy puts more of our people (here and especially overseas) in peril, let us look more closely at who our people need protection from.

1. Who is behind the terror attacks?

There is eye-witness evidence that Israeli Mossad agents brought down the twin towers and were "on the ground" in NYC when "911" took place. Eye-witnesses saw Israelis with a hire-van celebrating. The same hire-van was stopped by police whose explosive sniffer-dogs went haywire by the tunnel linking NYC with New Jersey. A story even leaked of a foiled terror attack on the NYC-NJ tunnel on the same day, before being silenced. The arrested Israelis were released without charge.

Or even without this proof, we can ask ourselves Quid Pro Quo. Who has the most to gain from "911" - a CIA established extremist Islamic group whose bases were destroyed? Or the Israeli war machine who achieved a turn-around in US policy (from non-interventionist to Neo Can war hawks) and had two anti-Israeli regimes turned to dust (not least revenge was taken out on the Scud-firing Iraq).

Ask yourself this: Who had the most to gain from the attacks and why has the evidence of Israeli involvement never been fairly discussed?

2. What kills more of our people every year?

If the duty of our government is to protect our people, why are they getting dragged (or running into!) foreign wars of a Neo-Con hawk nature when they cannot keep our own people safe on the streets of Britain?

David Cameron is showing his true Neo Con colours by urging military action against Libya. Another war for foreign interests alien to our own? Cameron is proving to be Blair mark II.

Meanwhile ask yourself this, in the last 10 years:

• How many British people got mugged or burgled (inc unreported cases)?
• How many British people got hooked on heroin?
• How many British people had their homes repossessed?
• How many British people lost decent jobs and have to scrape to make ends meet in McJobs or part-time employment with few rights?

and compare that to the number of British people murdered, injured etc. by "international terrorism."

I would suggest that more British people have been harmed by the banksters and their greed, or by the police who refuse to practice zero tolerance against muggers, burglars and dealers than have ever been harmed by any 'Axis of Evil,' Islamicist extremists etc.

3. And finally: who do our government obey?

If there is evidence that Israelis were (at the very least) involved in "911" and were active with explosives in NYC on the same day; if the Israelis had most to gain from the 'War on Terror'; if more British people have their lives taken, ruined or greatly disturbed by organised and petty criminals in the UK (especially English inner cities); why do successive governments pretend that their first priority is to protect UK citizens?

Why are we being lied to?

Why is our foreign policy being propped up by a huge lie?

Why is our domestic policy to let hundreds every day fall victim to robbery, violence and worse?

I don't want a police state, and I would argue that the 60s liberal experiment (and the explosion of single-parent families) and mass immigration has ruined communities to such an effect that many people no longer know right from wrong, no longer care for justice, for duty, for respect.

However, having a police force that actually deals with complaints of mugging, or burglary, or drug-taking and drug-pushing instead of worrying about if homosexuals can stay in hotels -- might that not be a good start?

Left: You think it's bad here? The US media is screamingly pro-Zionist and its two-party state is sewn up by the Israeli lobby. They pump billions into foreign wars and Israeli weaponry, whilst many of their own inner cities are war zones and are awash with drugs.

Don't expect the media or politicians to worry about this though. They are mostly pro-Israeli, many of them snort cocaine, most of them don't live in 'multi-culti' hell-holes or single-parent family sink estates and when it comes to 60s liberalism most of them are queer-friendly.

In short, nothing is set to change because the media, politicians and for that matter the banksters too form a circle of dependence. They are in each-others pockets and while they will justify all manner of foreign adventures to "protect British people" the very idea of actually protecting British people is anathema to them.

The other day I read an article about the efforts to get a foreign type of prawn out of a freshwater site because it was ruining the habitat of native species. Specialists, politicians and the media were involved and interested in catching and killing this alien threat to indigenous species.

Yet when have we ever had "specialists, politicians and the media" warn us of the effects of mass immigration? Habitats (eg the white communities of inner London) were decimated and destroyed in decades.

Today the politicians and media gurus will tell us how successful immigration has been.

Do you see it yet?

Whether it's the "War on Terror," crime, drugs, liberalism, homosexuality, abortion - you can virtually pick the topic at will! - this ruling elite does not have our interests at heart.

For them to pretend otherwise is sick in the extreme.

As the Skrewdriver song stated in the wake of the immigrant murder of the elderly patriot Albert Marriner in the early 80s: Now look at a sick society... Do we seriously think it's got better?

Lepanto by GK Chesterton

The Neo-Cons and dullards flying Israeli flags at anti-Mosque demos on both sides of the Atlantic would do well to get acquainted with GKC's Lepanto.

The forces who finally stopped the expansion of the Ottoman Empire were primarily led by Spain and her satellites/allies, the same forces who expelled the Jews from Spain and led the Inquisition to ensure the 'converted' ones who stayed behind did not continue their Talmudic practices.

Christians then fully understood that those opposed to Christianity had to be stopped or Christianity would be destroyed.

Sad to say that most Christians, especially in America, no longer realise that Judaism is directly opposed to Christianity.

That is why the "useful idiots" of the West are being used in Zionist conflicts.

Burning the Koran? Let's Burn the Anti-Christ Talmud!

If American Christians want to burn the Koran - can we get some American Christians to burn the Talmud?

Some of the choice exerts of the Talmud:

Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in "hot excrement."

Sanhedrin 106a. Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters."

I would urge everyone to read the following sites as they reveal the truth about the terrible, anti-Christian, anti-gentile, genocide-promoting hate texts in the Talmud.

The problem is that most American Christians (of all denominations) are so dumb, they think that Jews are on their side, whereas Judaism openly opposes Christ and His Church.


The Talmud Unmasked
The Truth About the Talmud

Are Extremist Groups Pressure Valves?

There is an interesting article in today's Sunday Telegraph - a paper known for its Secret State connections, and often used to put out stories with a 'spook' spin.

Right: Sadly the word repatriation today has far more to do with the bodies of hundreds of British servicemen coming home from needless Neo Con wars in coffins. By opposing Neo Con wars and looking to resettle non-Europeans we can actively seek friendship with Non-European nationalists and regimes for the betterment of all concerned.

Andrew Gilligan (of Dr David Kelly-leak fame) has reported that "extremist" Islamic groups could be used by Westminster as a safety valve for those 'radicalised' by political events.

Part of the government intelligence he refers to says that activists "do not progress" to terrorism through such groups.

The group Hizb ut Tahrir (HuT) - Gilligan tells us - condemns terrorism and regards integration as "dangerous." Perhaps it is for the latter reason that David Cameron called for a ban on HuT when he was in opposition?

The government paper 'Government strategy towards extremism' said that "individuals do not progress through non-violent extremist groups to violent groups" and that the former "may also provide a legal 'safety valve' for extreme views."

Perhaps if these groups educated people that Al Qaeda, '911' and the 'War on Terror' are all Neo Con-organised myths and smokescreens instead of acting up to their bogeyman image, they wouldn't give as much ammunition to the Neo Cons and their plastic patriot hangers on waving their little Israeli flags.

Certainly opposition to integration is a far more advanced and honest approach than the various Marxist and Zionist groups who want all native Britons to accept Third World immigrants into our communities, schools, work and even our families!

White, Christian nationalists could support Asians who wish to keep Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine for their own peoples, if the Asians in turn would return home and let us keep England for the English, Wales for the Welsh, Scotland for the Scottish and so on.

In a move that would see us break free of needless Zionist wars and the thralldom of banksters, we could agree to trade and more, whilst acknowledging the freedom of any Britons who wish to be Muslims in return for the many Palestinians, Iraqis etc. who are Christians.

Seeking such friendly terms of trade, information exchanges, diplomacy etc. with the entire Asian, Arab and other countries could help bring about an era of peace and prosperity for their continent(s) and for ours.

The financed, phased and humane resettlement of millions of non-Europeans would also help Asia and Africa with a wealth of compatriots returning who are well-educated, industrious, financially well-off, tradesmen etc.

Our countries would in turn be rewarded with social cohesion, indigenous communities, and a return to a collection of nations self-confident in their identities, with additional cultures and cosmopolitanism available via small, controlled settlement of Europeans as has always happened in our history (French, Irish, Italian etc.).

It is often said that to end a war (short of oblivion and one side being wiped out, innocents and all) one must sit and talk with one's enemies. Certainly in this day and age we have been dragged down the road of fighting other peoples' wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (and I'm sure they would like Iran next on the list) and it has done nothing to help us. On the contrary it has cost us in huge volumes of money, human lives lost, mutilated bodies, less safety at home and abroad.

Might world peace and the mass resettlement of Third World immigrants, for the betterment of all concerned, begin with men of goodwill from all sides agreeing to oppose integration, and to discuss in a mature manner the logistics and advancements available to all via resettlement, trade and peace?

Otherwise we continue being backed into corners, shouting slogans and achieving precious little as our enemies destroy all European cultures, every last vestige of Christianity, our history, our heritage, our very communities.

Has the time come when serious nationalists throw off the slogans of a dying system and put the future of our peoples first? Or will we take the crumbs and shekels from the top table and stay content in our corner as everything we hold dear slowly dies in a quagmire of multi-culti, big business-sponsored anti-culture?

I'd like to think nationalists could see beyond the sloganeering, beyond the Neo Con war headlines and take a stance that might deliver racial, national and cultural freedom.

Recent history, sadly, makes me doubt that they will.

The 51st State & Afghanistan

The more I have heard the Tories talk about Afghanistan and the recent murder of men of the Gurkha regiment by an Afghan soldier, the more they sound like NuLab II.

They reel out the old clichés about winning the war, about national security, etc. etc. ad nauseum.

We shouldn't even be in this pointless American adventure. Never mind accepting the simple fact that to withdraw we will have to negotiate with the Taliban.

Dr .Liam Fox on the Radio 4 Today programme this week sounded as monotonous as a Orwellesque government spokesman.

Yes, the war against Eurasia is going well!

Outside of multi-culturalism, the Balkanisation of our cities and the fact that 'White Britons' will, this century, we will be a minority in the UK - the biggest threat to our future comes from being the poodle of America.

Time to end the multi-culti nightmare and regain our independence (to be celebrated on July 5th!), whatever "homegrown terror" plots Mossad and/or the CIA plan as reprisals.