Visit the FC Shop!
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

An Illegal Immigrant and a State Breaking Ancient Laws

He's an ILLEGAL Immigrant. Simples.
The argument over Abu Qatada is all the fault of liberalism and a failed multi-racial immigration policy.

He is an illegal immigrant. He should not be in this country. He should have been turned back on Day One. But like countless (literally!) other illegal immigrants he was allowed in, and immediately gets hand-outs.

He has not (so we are told) broken any laws since his illegal arrival and the state locked him up because his thoughts are deemed dangerous.

So let us analyse this:

  • His very presence here is illegal (a costly mistake as he, like others, receives state handouts).
  • The state is locking up those it disagrees with, without stating what law they have broken.

Both of those should worry nationalists - because the former means the politicians are traitors, letting in hundreds of thousands of non-Europeans each year (against our wishes), yet when the dangerous ones are spotted they then tweak the law to lock up people on a pretext.

Now I do not support "militant Islam" before the Neo Con trolls start up. I am a White Christian Nationalist. I do not believe in coloured immigration. I believe Europe should be Christian in its entirety (as Belloc said "Europe is the Faith, the Faith is Europe").

However, the fact the the state is locking up Muslims (rather than just stopping the entry of all non-Europeans) means that one day they will be more than capable of doing this to nationalists.

Far fetched? Many/most "terror attacks" are false flag operations. Many "extremist" Muslims are in the pocket of the CIA/Mossad (just as top IRA people were in the pocket of the British state).

All it takes is one false flag op, one paid-idiot to spout crap about "sending 'em home in body bags" and we could easily see nationalists who have spoken out against coloured immigration, multi-culturalism locked up for "hate speech."

That is why nationalists need to be intelligent. By all means oppose Abu Qatada. Oppose his Islamism. Oppose his very presence here. But please do not be (Neo) Conned into supporting an illegal act of government which flies in the face of Magna Carta, the Law and Natural Justice.

If the government had any cajones it would stick him on the first plane home, as it should have done x number of years ago, just as it should with all illegal immigrants.

Illegal = Criminal.

But their liberalism means he stays here, and so they think up new 'powers' for themselves to whisk people off the streets for their thoughts and ideas and bang them up indefinitely.

If a piece from this blog is one day found in the home of some Mossad-paid nutter who shoots or blows up blacks, Muslims, queers or whoever, they could come for me because they will say I am a "hater" and helped "inspire" Mr. Nutter (despite the fact that Third Positionists have always categorically condemned terrorism as morally unacceptable and tactically misjudged). But we all know how the government, media and various pressure groups work.

When the TP has had various centres, in this country and abroad, the Mossad-mouthpieces, media etc. have always parroted phrases such as "terrorist training camps" when they were anything but. A surprise visit would garner more books, families, games of football etc. then even a fish filleting knife. But that doesn't stop the media, the Mossad crowd and others - because they believe a lie oft repeated is a lie believed.

So please do oppose Abu Qatada in your writings, actions and conversations. But do not support the illegal actions of a (Zionist, multi-racist, anti-nationalist) state that could one day be used against law-abiding citizens who disagree with government policy.

Let's not make slaves of ourselves to cover up the ridiculously liberal immigration policy of a failed and treacherous system.

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

Distributism: A Movement Whose Time Has Come

This says it all.

When usury-bankers have created a huge financial mess.

When politicians care more about their own benefits than the Common Good.

When the police let criminals rule the streets whilst building a Police State.

When media hacks make up stories and spy on people to make a quick buck.

When the family collapses under immorality, amorality, a culture of death and government tactics.

When centralisation of government and banks in Euroland results in debt and slavery.

When plurality and moral chaos replace Christianity and tradition.

It's time for Common Sense.

Friday, 21 October 2011

NYPD: To Protect and Serve - Who???



Yes. We should ask that question: who do the state forces protect?

Our politicians tells us the first duty of government is to protect the people, yet they deliver us into the clutches of international financiers who bleed us dry, who embroil us in needless wars.

Who are they protecting? Not us.

Who are they serving? Not us.

Might we suggest: the "you know whos?"

Top cops have to be Freemasons. They do what the Freemason politicians tell them. The politicians are placemen of the Masonic bankers.

The few men who own the earth like to think we are "cattle" and they treat us as such, even using their Orwellian buzzwords to corral us, words like "Democracy," "Racism," "Fascist," "Rights" etc.

Even when thousands of people in the UK will die this winter because they cannot afford to 'heat and eat' whilst we funnel multi-billions into the clutches of the faceless bankers that keep us in relative penury.

All the while they will reward their placemen. Virtually every top politician leaves office and gets well-paid jobs (for doing almost nothing) as a reward for their treachery.

And that is why they will always pour money into the coffers of the bankers, whilst squeezing the rest of us until the pips squeak. So look at this video. Who are the police protecting? Who's giving the orders? Who do they protect and serve?

It sure as hell ain't "us."

Tuesday, 2 August 2011

Establishment Corruption: Rare BBC Radio Programme

An email we received:
 
A truly astonishing and revealing broadcast from the BBC.
It will be re broadcasted at 21.30 BBC R4 and available as a 'listen again' for download soon and I urge everyone to listen to it and to record and save it for future reference.
Of course, while it, and the subject with which it deals- corruption within the police, the media (particularly the Murdoch press) politics, and government, will come as a jaw dropping revelation to the average sheeple, for those of us aware folk this is only the tip of a very large iceberg.
What must surprise us- amazed me- was the fact that the BBC chose to broadcast such a programme.
What a huge shame that we have no strong Nationalist party capable of fully exploiting these revelations about the very people and agencies most responsible for denouncing and trashing nationalism.
 
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0133s0f

Thursday, 21 July 2011

HackerGate: The Missing Link

Media moguls, police, politicians, judiciary, hacks: where on earth would they all meet-up? Where would they give out jobs to each other? Where would they do "insider dealing?"

Imagine the scene in plush, tree-lined avenue in a posh London suburb:


Govt. Minister: "Good to see you at the Lodge again m'Lord. Fancy a swift round of golf?"

Inquiry Chairman: "Of course."

Top Copper: "Then a swift brandy and cigar at the clubhouse, my treat."

Inquiry Chairman: "That's most kind."

Govt. Minister: "Now about this enquiry..."

Saturday, 11 June 2011

Police State Run by Bankers and Masons

This bloke - as my children would say - totally 'owns' a policeman who seems to think that any protest needs to be lodged with the Big brother state, and bluffs his way by threatening to arrest someone who has done NOTHING wrong.

If only orgenised parties like the BNP stood up and denounced the banking and taxation system - based on usury slavery which should be totally illegal - they might win support from right acoss the political spectrum.

Who wants questionable and unjust wars before schools and hospitals?

Who wants taxes going to billionaire financiers when it should be given back to those paying it or small amounts taken to help the needy?

After yours of quasi-Zionist b.s. blaming the Muslims for everything [rather than coloured immigration simply being a part of the NWO assault on our freedoms and rights] and selling out to a political system run by the Masonic elites for baubles and scraps from their table; it is time that NATIONALISTS made it clear that we are the people against usury, against the financiers, against Zionism and its wars.

We have been betrayed for years.



In part one of this series the activist DOES make some mistakes - primarily confusing the "corporations" of Fascist Italy with todays Big Businesses, multi-nationals and international finance.

The Corporations of Fascist Italy were in fact akin to the medieval Guilds, and so were like the Trade Unions representatives having seats in government, so the workers from all trades had direct representation in government.

That is fascism. Fascism was a socio-economic ideal based on Christian social teaching. It was not giving the goverment to alien financiers, Freemasons and Mafioso.

This government is! It is uber-Capitalism. CAPITAL and its power, its tax, its usury, RUINS our lives, empties our pockets.

Fascism was popular. It was national. It gave freedom. It may not have been perfect, what system run by men ever could be (we live in societies not false utopias)? But compared to the debt slavery today it is a world apart.

We aren't even safe on our streets! Whilst the government gives billions to financiers and billions to needless Zionist wars, WE ARE NOT EVEN SAFE ON OUR OWN STREETS.

Why not have a war on mugging? A war on anti-social behaviour? A war on street gangs?

That would make peoples' lives much better than dropping million pound (financially speaking!) bombs on varies countries, or giving billions to mega-rich bankers.

Nationalists must start speaking these truths. Otherwise, by omission or commision, we are taking part in the biggest scandal in history - the enslavement of our people and many others too.

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Taxation: Where Does All the Money Go?

People in this country are taxed like never before. The government is in horrendous debt.

There seems to be an endless cycle of:

Tax-payer - to Government - to Bank.

Worse still, the government is borrowing money from banks to pay off loans from banks.

Worse still it is paying off loans it took out from banks, to bail out banks.

Even in the "good years" the government was borrowing money whilst simultaneously paying back similar amounts.

Why not just stop borrowing?

Worst of all, the government could issue its own money instead of borrowing it.

We no longer have to have gold coins because our money is all but valueless pieces of paper based on a huge debt bubble.

My question is this:

As the banks (Bank of England, Federal Reserve etc. - all private banks) create money out of thin air and loan it to governments, where does all the money, earned by our labour and taxed from us, end up?

Where does all the money go?

Am I alone is thinking that there is a class of people, mega-rich beyond the dreams of avarice, constantly acquiring more wealth like gluttons at an all-you-can-eat buffet?

Or are these billions used to buy up land, businesses etc. to give them more wealth?

Or are these billions used to 'sweeten' (bribe) politicians, generals, dictators and parties to keep the con going?

Or is it all of the above?

I am reminded of a few quotes:

"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependant on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class." — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild


"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government's institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers" — Congressional Record 12595-12603 — Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency (12 years) June 10, 1932


"Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities, intrinsically, a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries." — Modern Money Mechanics Workbook, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1975

"Banks lend by creating credit. They create the means of payment out of nothing" — Ralph M. Hawtrey, Secretary of the British Treasury

"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." — Henry Ford


But the daddy of all the quotes about banking is this peach. Hold on to your socks:


"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." — SIR JOSIAH STAMP, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain).

Link:
Quotes on Banking

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

The National Debt: Criminal Conspiracy by Politicians and Bankers


Inflation is up, wages have all but frozen.

Barclays Bank profits are up, and their average wage rose by £236,000.

Left: The debt rises continually.

While the rest of us are pushed into penury by a system that has bankrupted the UK to bail out the banks, who in turn keep us all in debt-slavery, the banks are already dolling out huge wages and bonuses to themselves.

The banks have screwed us all, messed up the economy, keep us in debt for life, strip the nation to pay unpayable debt interest.

Yet they live the life of luxury in our faces.

Right: National Debt as a percentage of the country's output ever since William of Orange sold us out for 400+ years by letting banksters establish the Bank of England. Note that National Debt is usually greater than the entire economic output of Britain (GDP)!

It is no longer a case of "paying unto Caesar" because Caesar is being robbed blind by the banks, and turning a blind-eye to the theft because Caesar's top crew are getting crumbs from the banking table.

The Church says that to defraud a working man of a just wage is one of the four sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance.

Not just quite bad, nor even really bad. But it cries out to heaven for vengeance.

Those are strong words.

How much worse then for an entire system to be based on a national debt for which the working man is taxed to the eyeballs (the poorer disproportionally moreso), which can never be paid off?

Even in the boom years the UK was paying the national debt interest (whilst still borrowing!) to the tune of millions heaped on billions.

Tony Blair said "education, education, education" before 1997, yet when in power he paid more off the national debt interest than he did on education.

The politicians are like drunken housewives, borrowing on top rate credit cards whilst paying the minimum due on existing ones, whilst the debt grows and grows.

Yet unlike the drunken housewife, the politicians can take the money from our pockets to pay the interest payments.

It is a fraud on a gargantuan scale.

It is criminal conspiracy to the tune of many billions per year.

It really is a sin crying out to heaven for vengeance.

Sunday, 13 February 2011

Government Want Full-On Homosexual 'Marriage'


Here we go again!

Or if we allow emotion to rule the heart, here we f###### go again!

New Labour wasted hours and hours promoting the sodomite agenda.

Now with the country falling apart around our ears, the Lib-Con govt is going to spend more time pushing the sodomite agenda.

No wonder we are in such a mess.

We can also, through this story, see two important things:

  • The system's agenda has ALWAYS been for homosexual "weddings." They are not interested in civil partnerships. That's just softly, softly catchee monkey cobblers that all treacherous, profiteering, nepotistic bastards use to try and fool all the people all the time. They WANT full-blooded faggot "weddings" so the pooves are "totally equal."
  • Peter Tatchell, the apologist for a paedophile agenda, is still the mouthpiece for the homosexual agenda. This shows us where we are headed. The homosexual agenda is a sick agenda. It will promote disease and death. It will promote drug use and abuse. It will promote sexual deviancy in private and public. It will lead to laws being ignored by the police and eventually overturned (especially viz public decency). It will lead to sexual acts with minors being gradually lowered.
Think I'm being hysterical? Go back to the 50s, 60s and even 70s and ask the public what they thought.

The media and government have promoted a sodomite, homosexual, degenerate agenda.

No wonder deviancy and drug usage is rampant in the media (and not far behind in parliament, the city etc.).

NATIONALISM MUST OPPOSE THIS AGENDA.

We must show we are different. We must show we are decent. We must show we oppose the homosexual, deviant agenda and their druggie cohorts.

Not to do so is to surrender our lands to moral anarchy.

BBC: Govt to All Homosexual Church "Weddings"

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

Usury, Banking Collapse, Unemployment, Taxes and Bonuses: We Lose, They Win

Yesterday on the BBC News at Ten George Osbourne, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, said that cuts were necessary as we need "to pay the country's credit card bill."

As local councils look to put people on the dole and close libraries, swimming pools etc. this is scant comfort for us plebs.

What George - chum of the Rothschilds and Bullingdon Club spoilt brat - fails to understand is that he is the economic boss of a STATE, not a mum on a council estate.

He shouldn't be turning to loan sharks to make ends meet. We shouldn't be paying back BILLIONS in loan interest payments.

He, if he put the people first -- and not the profits of the banksters -- would have the government issue its money as a credit (instead of borrowing it into circulation as a debt).

This simple act would save us BILLIONS.

Our taxes could be slashed. Money put into schools, libraries etc. could be increased.

Left: Barclays Bank boss Bob Diamond. He's on an £8 Million bonus this year, despite, as thisismoney.co.uk says: "Barclays was yesterday hit with a record £7.7m mis-selling fine and ordered to pay back £60m in compensation to thousands of customers." If you oversaw a record fine in your job would you get a huge bonus - or the sack?


Tony Blair said "education, education, education" yet in his first year in power he spent more on debt repayment than education!

The politicians are covering up this scandal, decade on decade.

In this week's Private Eye they mention government minister, Francis Maude, who was paid almost £600-an-hour after tax as an advisor, by Barclays Bank.

And we should all remember how Norman Lamont (and the Exchange Rate Mechanism mess that cost millions) walked out of office to a job with Rothschilds.

When will the politicians put the people before usury debt? When will the politicians stop trying to line their own pockets whilst we drown in the usury-debt created by their chums?

When will we realise that these people - chosen by party political machines bank-rolled by Big Business - are little more than treacherous hirelings of the banking system?

So, could things get any more annoying than George "Boy" Osbourne treating us like imbeciles on the news, waffling on about the "credit card" we have to pay back?

Well today I did something I don't normally do (promise you won't tell?).

I was out for lunch with a colleague in an Italian bistro and while we waited for our food I looked at the newspapers available to read in the establishment. Ignoring the tabloids, the only other paper was The Independent.

So, I took it and flicked through it.

Therein was a disturbing story (past the paper's gloating over the court victory of two sodomites over two hoteliers in Cornwall).

Goldman Sachs - possibly the most Zionist of the banks - which was responsible for the 'world economic crash' that took Capitalism to the brink of ruin, quite literally, and yet the paper was saying how the bank (which should have folded) was dishing out bonuses to the tune of £10 Billion.

Yes: £10 Billion!

The CEO of Goldman Sachs (one Lloyd Blankfein!) has overseen this opulence, while the peoples of America are still suffering after the economic collapse.

Right: Goldman Sachs boss Lloyd Blankfein. According to Fortune magazine "He was paid $68.7 million in 2007 - record for a Wall Street chief - and recently bought a $26.5 million apartment at 15 Central Park West." 2007 was the year before Goldman Sachs helped put us billions in debt and put millions on the dole in the USA, Europe and elsewhere. Nice to know he lined - and is still lining - his own pockets. Kerching!

Nice to know that wherever they exist, no matter how much debt and suffering they cause, despite the hikes in unemployment and taxes they bring about; the banksters are content to dish out huge bonuses to themselves.

The inmates may be running the asylum, but it's the criminals who are profiting.

Link:
Goldman Sachs Rewards Staff

Tuesday, 18 January 2011

Two New Criminals: What a Waste of the Court-System!


So a couple running a bed & breakfast have lost a court case brought by two sodomites, because the b&b owners wouldn't let the buggers stay in a double room.

Right: Peter and Hazelmary Bull with supporters. Hardly the image of hate! How happy are you that time and money is wasted dragging such law-abiding normal people through the courts, as Britain descends into amoral and violent chaos?

Years ago we used to moan about 'Blair's Bolshevik Britain' because of all the restrictive laws that he passed, and the time wasted on passing laws to favour the sodomites and other degenerates.

If you are a genuine Christian in this land, and that includes being opposed to sodomites and the promotion of their death-style and immoral creed, then you cannot be a social worker, a "relationship" counsellor, open an adoption agency, or run a hotel or bed & breakfast.

Or rather you can: but only if you agree to their Bolshevik-laws, i.e. you have to promote homosexuality too.

If you don't some degenerate sodomites will crawl out from under their stone to take you to court: backed by some sodomite "charity" or, as in this case, the government's own Equality and Human Rights Commission.

We are free to shake our chains.

And if you speak against it on the radio or at a public event, the police will knock at your door (yes, this is well documented), even if faggots beat you up in a public place for promoting Christianity, it is likely that you will be arrested if the queers claim you were being "homophobic" (regardless of the facts - in a Poof version of the ultra-pc MacPherson Report guidelines)

Cameron has replaced Blair. Blue has replaced Red. But little else has changed. The rot continues.

The onward march of degeneracy, sodomites, their paedophilic agenda (promoting buggery to school children via "charities") continues.

Don't accept it!

Speak out against it. In patriotic circles, on nationalist forums, in your local Church, to work colleagues or wherever else you can let others know that they are not alone in finding the governments obsequious fawning to the sodomite death-style totally repugnant.

They can close down the adoption agencies. They can ban the bed and breakfasts. They can arrest the street preachers. They can bring the Stasi dawn knock-at-the-door to those who speak out. They can pass their laws, and use State agencies to spread fear; but as long as one brave soul will speak the Truth, they can never stifle it.

And there are many of us left!

The fight for freedom is underway, do not be cowed by the bullies. We have the Truth on our side, and 'the Truth will set you free!'

Link:
BBC story (typically pro-poof)
Couple Claim they were Set-up

Sunday, 19 December 2010

Marcus Brigstocke - Another Champagne Socialist


You can tell an archetypal leftist/socialist/anarchist/communist (delete as necessary) because they liberally diffuse the word "actually" throughout their discourses, like the Dave Spart character in Private Eye.

They also regularly turn up in the media, as rent-a-gobs with a pre-formed opinion on radio shows, or on Question Time, or on comedy panel shows. Funny how socialists (many of whom still secretly admire mass murderers) get such a regular outing on the media. That tells us more about our media -- e.g. when immigration is discussed they will role out an immigrant activist, a businessman (who needs cheap labour immigrants) and a socialist to tell us -- from all their perspectives -- how immigration has bettered the lot of each and every one of us.

A dissenting voice is rarely allowed! We can't be told that the emperor is naked.

The worst type of lefty-rebel is the privately educated, upper-middle class types, who put a punk t-shirt on, swear a bit and then proceed to tell all of us workers what is best for us (this invariably includes open-border policy on immigration, and wholesale "rights" for homosexuals) -- everything the traditional workers were (and many still are, despite BBC brainwashing) against.

Now many would be-anarchos start off school in posh paid-for establishments. One such person I've noticed pushing his ultra-liberal agenda (except when it comes to those who oppose his agenda) is the bloke with the most middle class name of all: Marcus.

yes, on Radio 4's 'The Now Show' over the last two weeks, Mr. Marcus Brigstocke has all but screeched his disapproval of anyone who opposes "climate change" and those who deems "right-wing extremists" (the BNP & EDL).

According to Wikipedia, "Brigstocke attended Westbourne House School just outside Chichester before going onto the independent King's Bruton School in Somerset."

The former is a posh semi-boarding prep school, the latter is another semi-boarding posh school.

Just in case you think Marcus went to a bog-standard school like me (and most of the readers of this blog), here's some facts about King's Bruton school in Somerset (known for its huge population of Pakistanis and Gangsta Rappers - not):


In September 1999, The Hobhouse Science centre was opened, complete with a fully equipped observatory. The School enjoys a purpose built theatre, sports hall and fitness suite and exceptional sports surfaces for rugby and cricket as well as an all weather pitch for hockey.

Oh how lucky we poor proles are -- with our hatred of our country being turned into a Third World dump, distrust of One World agendas -- to have grown up posh kids like Marcus to tell us how we are wrong!

Brigstocke is like all the politicians who went to posh schools who then tell us how great the comprehensive system is; and the politicians who live in rich suburbs who tell us how fortunate those of us who grew up in areas with huge Asian or black populations were!

Reminds me of the 'Londoner' Socialist Billy Bragg who happens to live in whitest Dorset -- but how that's OK because he talks to the Asian who works in his local petrol station (honestly - he said that once in an interview).

Right on!

Brigstocke can wax lyrical about global warming because he can afford the extra taxes. Here's a man who - I dare say - travels on a plane more often the average working-class man, busy preaching to us.

Brigstocke can inform us how great (comprehensive) multi-cult schools are because he went to virtually all-white posh schools.

Another left-wing wannabe-anarcho-socialist from a privaleged background telling us why we should let our country become a non-White/European, non-Christian, UN/EU slave-state no doubt with poofs having full "rights" and buggery taught in schools.

What do I mean "become" - thanks to Marcus and his ilk who entered the media, parliament and the legal profession -- that's exactly what this country has become.

Still, at least we have rich kids like Marcus to tell us how lucky we are, and how "evil racists" are so bad (in that "two legs bad, four legs good" kind of way).

Friday, 17 December 2010

Protest Against the Profiteering Multi-Nationals


Demonstrators are starting to ask why characters (New Unhappy Lords, men with no loyalty to nation, people who use concentration-camp goods from China and child labour sweat-shop clothes from Asia to make millions in profit and undercut European and British-made quality items and local shops) such as Philip Green can tax dodge and get jobs with the government.

Left: Phillip Green chunnels his billions through his wife Tina, based in Monaco, to avoid paying taxes. Meanwwhile he is employed by the British government. Boycott his shops such as Burton, Topshop etc.

People are asking why the government can bail out banksters for muti-billions, wipe out a tax bill (Vodafone) for £6 billion, then chase unemployed people for relative pennies, close down old peoples' homes, shut hospital wards, shut local libraries etc.

Nationalists must take part in, or organise, demos against the banksters, Zionist big businesses and those who first loyalty is profit and not our nation and our people.

If we don't we give ground to the brain dead Anarcho-pinkos and moth-eaten Marxian deadbeats, with no real answers!


Power from Profit - They're buying your souls!
Power from Profit: puts you on the dole.


Link:
Uk Uncut

Friday, 8 October 2010

Child Benefit: the Nationalist Response

How fitting that the Tories should seek to stop Child Benefit for top earners.

Right: George Osborne. Chancellor. Friend of the Rothschilds. Will never take action against the banksters. Traitor.

I'm not going to go on about cutting benefits etc., as I've covered all that before (viz attack the banksters who cause the usury-debt bubble before attacking the poor).

Some will argue that the rich don't need the money, that those earning circa £45K p.a. don't really need an extra state hand-out and "in these difficult times" etc. we can save a few bob.

The not dealing with the banksters (who still have us by the gonads, and could bring this and most other countries to our knees in a matter of days) aside, my worry is this.

Child benefit sends a positive message about having children. Taking it away from some people (whatever the criteria) sends the message that families and children aren't important to society.

We live in a country that is dying. We don't have enough workers to pay the taxes that will pay for future pensions as our society 'greys.'

More children are born to immigrants and non-Whites, whilst the indigenous people put 'careers' or holidays and other creature comforts before our existence as European peoples (the 'I'm alright Jack' mentality).

So here's the FC idea:

  • Everyone who qualifies can get a generous child benefit, regardless of income.The idea is to promote families and more children amongst all classes (e.g. It is irrelevant to you if your forefathers were rich or poor - merely that they were indigenous White Europeans).
  • Qualification depends on wedlock and the children being to the same parents. This will promote stability and reduce the "multiple partner" mums getting hand-outs.
  • The benefit is only open to Europeans whose parents (i.e, one or more grandparent on each side) were born here. This will mean a reversal of the decline of the White population.
  • Africans and Asians can receive a similar benefit: one of resettlement to their lands of origin, with funds to help their housing etc. 'back home'.
All will be carefully costed by stopping our involvement in pointless, needless wars and by refusing to pay any more of the ridiculous, scandalous national debt.

What d'you think? It's a vote winner!

Friday, 1 October 2010

Capitalism is a Con Trick: Ask the Irish


We all pay tax as we earn, buy and die. Tax goes into a bottomless pit to pay usury-debt. The banks control the system, nations, governments. The governments collects tax. The tax goes into a bottomless pit...

And so the cycle goes on ad nauseum!

Right and Below: The politicians all try and score points against each other, but the truth is that they will all raise taxes and cut services rather than stop paying usury debt to the criminal banksters and money-lenders. Their first loyalty is to the banking system not the people they claim to serve.

Look at Ireland.

Ooh wasn't the Celtic Tiger the be all and end all? It was billed as a Brave New World for the Irish. Join the Euro, become a modern country, make the big league, be awash in money! Money was the new god.

All their troubles, their agrarian, Christian past - all so medieval, backwards, insular and... er... mono-cultural. All would end.

The new, rich, advanced, progressive, multi-culti and rich Ireland was on the scene. Oh how wonderful it all was!

Yet it was all an illusion. Ireland was being mortgaged by greedy bankers. Their freedoms were being sold to the Stalinist EU. Their very 'Irishness' was being destroyed by waves of immigration.

But all this was OK as long as the money rolled in. Most people are fickle you see. Give them success, money, good times - and they will put up with a lot they normally wouldn't.

A political party can be corrupt, nepotistic, cronyism can run rife, principles be betrayed: as long as elections are won. But take that away and the grumbles start.

Well, the Irish now have plenty to moan about. As taxes rise, unemployment rises and negative equity rises.

What a mess.

It is time that all nationalists in all nations started educating fellow patriots about usury-tax and the con going on.

Almost everything else is a side-show or consequence of this con.

The New Unhappy Lords are ruling over us, taxing us, destroying our lands, bribing our politicians.

The whole rotten edifice must be questioned, otherwise we are wasting our time.

Tuesday, 28 September 2010

It's Modern Democracy Jim, But Not as We Know it


Choose Your Poison Dumb Goyim.

Right: Milibandbot 1.2 is made Labour leader.

So a Miliband is now the leader of the Labour Party, having beating a Miliband.

The leader of the labour Party would be the offspring of a Jewish Marxist who "escaped the Nazis" (considering so many did we have to question the total ########### ########### [deleted by the thought police]).

It reminds me of the election in America in which Bush and Kerry ran for the presidency. Both were members of the highly secretive Masonic Skull & Bones society. So whoever the Yanks voted in, they'd get a 'bonesman.'

That's democracy all over.

The party system, media control etc. etc. ensures that elections are usually Tweedledum V. Tweedledee affairs, with the usual Masonic puppets fighting over the "centre ground" and extolling the virtues of multi-culturalism and the dangers of global warming.

Democracy = control by the elites, Masonic parties, plutocrats in control, under the iron heel of international financiers, taxed to the hilt to throw money into a bottomless hole of usury debt.

Just to make you happy on a Tuesday!

Peoples of the World Unite Against the Masonic Powers: You Have Nothing to Lose but Slavery and Debt.

Rant over.

Friday, 10 September 2010

Osborne: Target the Bankers before the Dole Bums


The Chancellor of 'our' government, George Osborne, is targeting dole bums.

Right: Nat Rothschild is No. 2, George Osborne is No. 7 in Bullingdon Club pose. How worrying for everyone that Osborne is wearing the most foppish attire of them all!


As soon as I heard this it reminded me of one of the best books I have read delineating a Nationalist worldview. It was written by the Irish pro-lifer Justin Barrett, and is called The National Way Forward.

Albeit, from an Irish perspective, the book tackled many political problems we face across many states and nations in Europe.

One of the key things that stuck in my mind was how Barrett explained how the government (of Ireland -- but this is true of the UK, USA etc.) was in hock to the international bankers and financiers, yet instead of tackling usury debt they would go for the small fry -- i.e. dole bums.

No one denies that there are dole bums, this subclass do exist, in Ireland, Britain and elsewhere, but the point is that whilst it is wrong for anyone to live on what was supposed to be a 'safety net' for the working man, the real criminals are the bankers.

Billions, if not trillions, are poured into the endless black hole of the national debt (regardless of credit crunch, crashes etc.) but the government will never act against the real criminals, because they are the same breed, they went to the same schools, they leave office to work for them, the bankers pay their political office costs, etc.

Now, in the shadow of a crisis created wholly and solely by the banks, George Osborne, pal of the Rothschilds, targets... dole bums.

By all means target them, Mr. Osborne: but do not do it to take our eyes from the truth.

The New Unhappy Lords, with their "bright dead alien eyes" have delivered us into penury, into debt slavery, and thrown hundreds of thousands of working men onto the dole in Ireland, Britain, America etc. etc.

George Osborne will end his time in government four, nine or however many years from now and walk into a job with one of the bankers that have caused this mess, because whilst in office he has been their poodle.

Rather than protect the workingmen of this country, by making us self-sufficient and free of usury-debt, Mr. Osborne continues our slavery, continues raising taxes and slashing services to pay off his banking buddies.

They are the real criminals!


They have given us into the hands of the new unhappy lords,
Lords without anger and honour, who dare not carry their swords.
They fight by shuffling papers; they have bright dead alien eyes;
They look at our labour and laughter as a tired man looks at flies.
from The Secret People by GK Chesterton.




Friday, 20 August 2010

Druggies Losing Benefits - Good, But Not Enough


I awoke this morning, and before I could slide on my monogrammed FC slippers the radio was informing me of the Home Office's decision to reintroduce a NuLab idea of stopping benefits (state hand outs) to drug addicts who refuse treatment to get them off their addiction.

I concur.

I think this is a good start. But it's not enough.

It's not that I'm like the liberals who lined up on the radio to rail against the forceful nature of the moves -- I think sometimes you need a touch of tough love, especially with people with real problems who cannot help themselves and will lie, even to their closest relatives, to keep getting their fixes.

Furthermore we should also remember that just as they are victims -- so are the rest of us. From the small shop keeper who gets his goods stolen, to the child who plays in the park near used needles, and the many others who suffer from the crime and degenerate nature of drug addiction.

We deserve help too - and forcing druggies to go through cold turkey (or whatever else) can only help all of us.

However.

This will all be a complete waste of time, effort and money if there is no support structure for these people (all someones brother, son etc.) to enable them to stay 'clean' once they go through their treatment.

Unless this action is universal, there will be druggie circles waiting to embrace them and reintroduce them to the 'joys' of addiction within weeks of being reintroduced to society.

Furthermore, unless we as a society crack down mercilessly on drugs and especially the dealers and importers of this scourge right across the board, then new addicts will quickly be created, to be joined by the ex-junkies at any given stage.

Unless this move is joined by an absolute and unconditional Crusade Against Drugs, it is just more tinkering around the edges, with no long term vision to help the sad individuals hooked on drugs and the rest of us who suffer the consequences.

Indeed those conspiratorially minded might say it is being done deliberately to show there is 'no answer' so that heroin et al can be 'legalised.'

This idea of stopping benefits, as with so many things initially promoted by NuLab is, I fear, more about winning Daily Mail accolades, and less about offering real solutions to communities and families that have been all but destroyed by the cancer of drug abuse.

I would hope intelligent government ministers (most have more qualifications than I) would join the dots and see that we need an all-embracing, universal move to help the addicts and crack down mercilessly on the pushers.

I don't think I'll hold my breath though.

A very good friend and comrade of mine helps drug addicts on the streets. He has got many through bad times, helped them get accommodation, has learnt that many of them are good people, thrown into the lion's den through bad companions or bad events. He helped one particular pour soul get clean (amongst others). He was a good man with a very sad back story. Then he went off and a short while later was found dead from drugs.

You see those who got him hooked, wanted him back on the drugs. This basically good man was just trash to them, and then he was limp with lifeless eyes, his life wasted, his future gone. Another person's son was dead, full of injection holes. Another life given over to crime and drug abuse.

Unless we create a situation wherein we can release these people into a society free from drugs, where he and those like him can't be preyed on by other junkies or the pushers, and where they can be helped by those who believe in a second chance, then in so many cases they will go back to the substance that has a strange love-hate hold over their lives.

At the moment the good work, the demanding work, the heart-breaking work of those like my friend who fight seemingly against all hope, are like King Canute trying to hold back the tide (I know he did it to prove he couldn't before anyone writes in).

They are good people fighting an oncoming tide of evil.

They deserve better, the junkies deserve better, society deserves better. The pushers deserve the rope.

As with the banking usury that has thrown people on the dole on a generational basis, or the mass immigration that has destroyed traditional white working class communities, the powers-that-be do not care about "the people." That much is obvious.

They all claim to be Christian, yet Christ showed the example of moving amongst the destitute in society, to help them and show true compassion and true charity.

The politicians move through a world of mega-rich bankers, celebrities, big egos, large wallets, vacuous, rich men.

Outside of short photo opportunities which they are whisked to and from in their luxurious chauffeur driven cars, these people know nothing of the underworld inhabited by the junkies.

Unless and until we strike out against drugs in a meaningful way nothing will change. No mercy against the pushers, true compassion and tough love towards the junkies.

That much is obvious.

If nationalists promote this -- as with usury-free banking and tax-free local government -- I sincerely believe we can show the people that we are the only force for Social Justice. We are the only people who truly care for our people.

Unlike the politicians we shouldn't do this to win headlines, we should do this to win hearts and minds, and to save society from a disaster that it is currently sleepwalking towards.

Monday, 16 August 2010

Fidelity in Marriage and Fidelity to Nationalism


I have always said that the man who cannot show fidelity to his wife, cannot show fidelity to his Nation.

In other words, the man who breaks the vow he made before God (or I guess in these days, before some local council appointee) and shows no honesty in this regard and the promises he made to his wife, will just as easily betray the nationalist cause (or indeed any cause).

Right: We have enough liars, cheats and con men lauding it over us now. We shouldn't tolerate any in Nationalism.

I do not say such a thing in order to promote myself as some sort of "super husband." Far from it as Mrs. FC would be quick to point out.

I believe however that faithfulness to one's spouse is as important as the care of one's children, and the very least one should be capable of as a husband and father.

No parent would, I hope, dream of betraying the trust of their children by willingly putting them in danger. And yet it seems a growing number of 'men' see no problem in putting the very fabric of marriage in danger by cheating on their wives (and vice versa I'm sure, but let's deal with the men here).

As nationalists, as patriots, I would hope that all of us would concur that the family, that marriage, is central to the stability of the nation.

That much, surely, is glaringly obvious.

Aside from mass immigration making vast swathes of England into microcosms of Asia and Africa, with all their tribal conflicts and the societal problems that generations of offspring of mixed cultures bring, I would honestly say that the collapse in the family has played a major part in the UK's downward spiral.

Anti-social crime often stems from broken or dysfunctional 'families.' Drugs run through communities where families have broken-up and the community spirit is lost. A generation of kids grow up with no male role model, or a succession of "uncles" or step-dads.

In this situation some liberal voice - or even a well-meaning soul who has found himself in this situation through no fault of their own - will pipe up and provide the example of a 'broken' family that works well.

And I do not doubt they exist, just as there are old-fashioned families that are a train wreck. But these are the exceptions that prove the rule.

Look across Britain and you see a society where the family has all too often collapsed, and the consequences are there for all to see.

Furthermore I would argue that in the people who are chosen (by media moguls and party systems) to rule us, there is an over-riding lack of honesty.

This was seen in the recent expenses scandal -- which I still insist happened just after the banking crisis because the media were ordered by the banking masters to reek revenge on the politicos who had dared bare their teeth against the bankers.

If the banking collapse hadn't happened, the expenses scandal would have been brushed under the carpet with perhaps a handful of replaceable fall guys taking the heat for all the other money-grubbers and traitors in parliament.

As it was the banks were left reeling after the attacks on them and their practices by all and sundry and -- despite being baled out by the tax-payers taking out more usury-loans to keep them afloat -- they released their attack dogs with the full venom of the expenses scandal.

A perfect example of why money grubbers are always open to control and blackmail .

But let's get back to fidelity in marriage.

Aside from the wider societal issues which I believe every Nationalist - and certainly every Nationalist that considers himself a Christian - must concur with, I think this has grave issues for the individual Nationalist.

As surely as the politicians who 'flipped' their second homes to fiddle their expenses, the nationalist who runs after a 'piece of skirt' just because she flutters her eyelashes at him, or because he has some sort of misguided idea that he has the right to try it on regardless, is showing that he puts his own welfare and well being ahead of anything else.

Such oath breakers will have no trouble in breaking the comradeship of the cause and betraying his compatriots.

What is more obvious still is that the nationalist that cheats on his wife lays himself wide open, as per the MPs' expenses and second home scandal, to coercion, blackmail and suchlike.

Some will say that temptation comes to folk and many slip up and recover and that is perfectly true. It is human nature.

However I do believe that as Nationalists - and especially as (to coin an old phrase) as nationalist 'cadre' material - we need to be showing the example for others to follow.

It's an idea as old as the hills and has been followed the length and breadth of Europe since your daddy was knee high to a grasshopper, but it remains as valid today.

Those who stand up to defend Faith, Family, Nation must be the best examples of fidelity to all three.

To do otherwise is as deluded as someone who says that race-mixing is wrong, that immigration has been a tremendous mistake, that the millions of Third World people in the UK should be humanely resettled in their countries of origin, etc. etc. deciding that taking an African as a mate is hunkydory and fine.

Wouldn't we all decry such an action as rank hypocrisy?

Just so, dear reader, with the nationalist who betrays his wife. There can be no excuse for such shenanigans whether within the movement or outside it.

If we are, one day, to build a new society from the wreckage of the liberal experiment that is spiralling downwards, then what right have we if we are no better than the people we denounce as traitors, cheats, profiteers and charlatans?

There are enough snake oil salesmen in our society without letting the nationalist cause become dominated by them.

The man who shows no loyalty to his wife, will show no loyalty to his nation; because the man with no conscience pertaining to the one closest to him, who he promised to love for life regardless of the circumstance, will have no conscience betraying those who are faces in a room, names on a list and who live miles away.

Anyone who has read the history of Mossad knows that they gain control of enemies in three ways: flattery and unknown bribary; corruption and known bribary; sexual 'honey traps.'

If, for no other positive reason, Nationalists should demand the very highest standards from their activists and leaders.

I have always believed that, and I am yet to be proven wrong.

Saturday, 14 August 2010

Lessons from Guernsey and the Isle of Mann

When the example of Guernsey* is given on how a society can be all-but tax free, some say that the size of Guernsey makes it easier to achieve there than on, say, an English or Scottish scale.

I disagree. The geography is bigger, the population bigger, the monies larger and so on - but the scale means that the problem is bigger too, hence the remedy is needed more than ever.

This is also one of my pet hates with patriotic candidates standing for election. Why on earth don't they propose local remedies to council tax?

I have always said that if any patriotic elected representatives were in the position to remove taxation by breaking free of usury banking they would be classed as national heroes. For a nationalist to prove that nationalism -- not Communism/Socialism -- has the answer to deliver our peoples from taxation and debt, would put the traitor parties forever in the shade.

But what of other matters?

This week I was talking to a Manxman about his homeland. He made it clear that even though the island's government was forced to change their law which had hitherto made homosexuality a punishable offence, the islanders would not tolerate things such as homosexual clubs and those found to engage in lewd acts in public conveniences** and suchlike faced public ostracism.

What a breath of fresh air to find common decency, community norms and family values being given free reign.

Another example he gave me was the total clamp down on drugs on the island. Even those attending the TT Race (annual motorbike event on the island) were regularly swept by sniffer dogs and even those found with a minute amount of "recreational" drugs would be locked up for the duration of the event.

I do not understand why our own authorities cannot act in this way. The death grip of liberalism, especially on local government, seems to mean that homosexuality and drug abuse are tolerated at best, promoted at worst.

Why do the authorities worry about catching mums on their way to the shops doing 34mph in a 30mph zone, rather than shutting down those who deal drugs in our communities?

Why does parliament find no time to pass laws that we desperately need (tackling immigration, corruption etc.) but finds plenty of time to pass law after law after law giving concessions to the homosexual death-culture?

Our law-makers and representatives seem to find no problem in, on the one hand, keeping us enslaved to mega-rich rulers of the universe so we are taxed up to the eye-balls for ever worsening 'services,' yet at the same time they find all the time to liberalise society on matters of morality.

Something stinks.

This is not how we want it. It is not how our forefathers want it.

We seem to being shafted on an ongoing basis, generation by generation.

In our children's or grandchildren's age the whole rotten society will be financially and morally bankrupt in the extreme, unless someone starts offering solutions in a sensible and attractive way to topple the stranglehold of the Masonic party bosses and media moguls who sell us out to all the sick vested interests.



*To find out more about Guernsey's struggle against debt and taxes, and how they broke free, read The Guernsey Experiment available from FC.
** Believe it or not but this act (aka "cottaging") is de rigueur in the homosexual death-culture.


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com