More Interesting Facts About Gaddafi and Libya

Nationalising oil and banking meant Libya was free, something that must have irked the Rothschilds. Moving oil funds to gold (away from the US Dollar) was a direct threat to America. This is why war was inevitable -- and why the "allies" are not so bothered about other countries' affairs.

After all, they backed the dictator Mubarak, for DECADES because he supported America and Israel -- even when he tortured and killed many civilians. The Rothschilds' news agencies and governments kept quiet.

Mubarak kept Egyptians in poverty, whereas Gaddafi helped the poorest in Libya. Yet the unforgivable crime is to reject false Rothschilds paper-money created out of thin air and grounded in usury.



No-one is suggesting Gaddafi is/was perfect or that his regime was perfect; but we can see that overall his regime's aim was the betterment of Libya, for the rights of Libyans, and for the freedom of his own continent from the control of international big business.

How much better than the corrupt despots kept in power by the CIA, who starve their people while they squander resources for their own profit?

Why Usury-Banking is a Scandal

This is what Nationalism should be nailing:



The Rothschilds are STILL robbing us blind.

if we do not understand the past, we cannot understand the present, and will be screwed all over again in the future.

Muslims are not the problem. They are a small symptom.

Nationalism needs to grow up.

Who is in Control of the Country: Brown, Harperson, Mandelson or the Rothschilds?

So the media was up in arms that whilst Gordon Brown was on holiday, his feminist deputy-PM (Harriet Harperson) was also on his/her 'hols' leaving the unelected failed politician and Europhile Lord Mandelson "in charge."

Right: What politico or media outlet will dare to outline the way our political class -- of all shades -- is in thrall to the Rothschilds and their subservience to the Zionist cause (and needless wars) as a result? This badge was being sold online by an alleged "nationalist." The rot is set deep!

The same Lord Mandelson was in Corfu as a guest of the Rothschilds.

Oh woe! The country is rudderless. The privately-educated lawyer/shyster-classes are on their August holidays leaving us alone with the chavs, immigrants and recently-unemployed (thanks to Lehmans Brothers and the other Masonic bankers).

Yet not one of the media outlets whose ire this raised had the cajones to say that our politicians are in the pockets of the Rothschilds.

Did the thought of Lord Mandelson on the super-yacht of David Geffen, off the holiday "home" (complex/mansion) of Nat Rothschild trigger thoughts of -- well, if not a global Jewish conspiracy then at least one that impacts on Europe and the UK?

Wouldn't the conspiracy theorists go apoplectic?

Better than to waffle on about the country being 'rudderless' than point out a real conflict of interest.

Just as Norman Lamont walked out of his disastrous unemployment-causing tenure in office into a Rothschild chauffeured car to be whisked off to his Rothschild sinecure... so the man in control of the government -- an "ex"-Communist (aren't they all?!) who has the right to "return" to Israel -- is already in the pockets of the Rothschild dynasty.

Oh... by the way just a few weeks before the same mansion/complex in Corfu was host to: Tony Blair! The alleged non-aligned Middle East peace envoy. Zoiks!

Our politicians bail out the Masonic/Talmudic banking system. We pay back that money in taxes for generations.

The same politicians are then treated to freebies by the same bankers.

In a recent FC mag there was a piece on a Rothschild mansion in Buckinghamshire, where the politicians of 200 odd years ago were feted and treated to freebies as they treated the working people of these isles as little more than chattels, indentured slaves who were sold into slavery in pre-teen years, died in their 30s and 40s (if they were lucky) in over-crowded, disease-ridden slums.

Now we are tied to dead-end McJobs, mortgaged to the hilt and sold into tax-slavery for generations.

And the same breed of privately-educated, lawyer-class treacherous, pocket-filling politicians are still in the pockets of the Rothschild dynasty!

Plus ca change.

Al Qaeda is a CIA/Mossad Front

We and many others have said this all along.

Just as Islam was created (as a combination of Judaism and Christianity) to counter the spread of Christianity eastwards and to act as a buffer to protect the Jews (who would convert the kingdom of Khazaria beyond the Arabic Muslim heartlands to provide them with a safe house), so the Jewish powers today have created Al Qaeda to provide a bogeyman for "Christians" to fear and to fight.

911 is a con. The entire "war on terror" and "clash of civilisations" is a con.

You, dear reader, are being conned!

Conned into supporting the short, medium and long-term goals of the Judeo-Masons, of the Neo Cons and of the Israel-Firsters.

In the meantime the traitor politicians, in the pockets of the Rothschilds and other Judeo-Mason banking 'elites', use the excuse of 911 and all the other false flag operations to pass ever more ridiculous laws, to freeze assets of Icelandic banks, to raid an MP's office because he leaked info on illegal immigrants, and to give draconian, Orwellian powers to a police force that cannot be trusted.

If you are not guilty you have nothing to fear. So say the bleeding heart dupe numpties. So say Sun editorials. So say the Neo Cons' useful idiots taking their 30 pieces of shekel silver to mould public opinion.

Tell that to the de Menezes family! Tell that to Damian Green and his family!

We are being ushered down a road of complete social control, allegedly to protect us from "Islamic terrorists" -- when our government, our police, our political and justice system in its entirety cannot even save us from the real terror of mass unemployment, of crippling debt, of knife wielding muggers, of drugs gangs with their guns, of spiralling crime - and the other social and societal evils that bring real terror to hundreds and thousands of families and individuals every single day.

But why bother about guns, drugs, crime etc. when we can "fight terrorism".

if Al Qaeda didn't exist they would have to invent it. Oh... erm... hang on a minute. They already did!


Link:
Asian Group Says Al Qaeda is CIA/Mossad

Government Plots to Put 20,000 on Dole

Well done to H.M. Government!

In protecting their chums at the top of the banking industry they are - by pushing through the merger of Lloyds-TSB and Halifax-Bank of Scotland (in essence turning what used to be four banks into one!) - ensuring that circa 20,000 people get thrown on the dole.

Right: How can a system exist wherein young able men are paid not to work? We should be fighting to bring about a worldview wherein work is a vocation, either in guild-organised trades or via family farms and small co-operative businesses. The wiping out of usury will also end the "boom and bust" of Capitalism and return us to just wages and fair prices.

If they were all hedge fund managers, top brass, investment bankers etc. etc. no-one would shed a tear.

But in a deal drawn up by the government and the banks you and I know that it's the pen-pushers and gofers that will face the chop.

Aren't the 20,000 lucky that the government cares enough to ensure that the greedy incompetents at the top of the banks - who helped make the recession even worse - keep their posts?

In any other industry you'd like to think (perhaps naively) that running up billions in debts or forcing your firm to merge with a competitor through incompetence would mean the end of the road for the bosses!

Not so for the bankers!

They get money (that the government borrowed from... er... a bank!!!!!) poured into them to prop them up.

Tsk tsk.

Would the government do that with British Rail to ensure the country's infrastructure remains up-to-date and free of profiteers? Er... no.

Would the government do that with British Coal to keep hundreds of thousands of workingmen employed? Or whole communities running properly? Or our fuel supply secure? Er... no.

But what of the ship building industry in Glasgow, Belfast, the North East etc.? Er... no.

Yet they suddenly find they can borrow what will amount to hundreds of billions to bale out a system that bleeds us all dry for the profit of a handful of mega-rich leeches, many of whom have no loyalty to this country (and all of whom employ tax-dodging scams to pay as little tax as possible such is their gratitude!).

Left: The "cattle" queue for free hand outs in the era of the Empire State Building! Capitalism has always been and will always be a scandal: and an organised scandal for the gross enrichment of a handful of mega rich Freemasons.

No, dear reader, when it comes to the bankster elite, when it comes to the international financiers, when it comes to the freemasons... er, I mean the bank bosses (as Saunders Lewis wrote, with their "Hebrew Snouts" in ledgers) the government will think nothing of letting 20,000 people face the dole (just before Christmas! Ho ho ho!) at a time when jobs are drying up and when mortgages are getting more expensive (as banks try to claw back profits).

So let me get this straight:

The banks get a bail-out and merge: the government pays.
A pen-pusher (x 20,000!) gets the sack: the banks profit.
A pen-pusher gets put on the dole: the government pays his dole.
A pen-pusher can't afford his mortgage: the bank repossess to get money.
A pen-pusher gets 'social housing': the government pays for his housing benefit.
When the government runs low of funds it raises taxes and borrows more... from the banks!

Anyone spot the pattern?

The banks profit.

The tax-payer pays.

How cosy and intimate those meetings of the top honchos must be in the Masonic lodges!

The Talmud is right in that regard. They are right to treat us as cattle! Because that is what we are, that is how we behave - and they "milk" us of taxes on a regular basis! Not to mention those who get sent to slaughter (in abortuaries... in Afghanistan... etc.) and even then they profit. Abortion is a big business and their wars benefit Israel!

I wrote some time back about housing conditions in Manchester and other English cities in the 19th Century.

Our people back then lived as slaves (yes: they were White and they were slaves, to borrow from Michael Hoffman). Housing conditions were awful, with whole families living in squalid, damp basements with no natural light.

Some worked in factories for a meagre wage, in appalling conditions, forced to buy from the 'factory shop' where, for example, bread was cheapened with wood shavings and was expensive to buy.

Others were forced into workhouses. Some children were forced to work for (appalling!) bed and lodge from the earliest age for 12 plus hours a day.

This is what happens when you de-Christianise a nation. This is what happens when the Masonic elite run things for their profit and fail to see that we are all made in the image of God. They view us as cattle, to be thrown out when we go lame. We are just cogs in their money-making machinery.

That is what the British Empire was built on! The suffering of our own people. We were slaves. They made gargantuan profits. They even ran huge drug pushing operations. All the pomp and glory was a backdrop to the worst housing and work conditions imaginable.

No wonder British workers (in the depression hit 1930s: Jarrow March etc.) looked to Fascist Italy with wonder when they realised that workers - the people - were treated as human beings. And this, unlike the Communist East was a land with no mass murder, collectivisation or gulags. But I digress...

From the land-grab of the Reformation, to the enclosure of the fields, to the industrial revolution with the creation of city slums... the Masonic elite has viewed us all as mere cattle to fill their factories and earn them mega-bucks ("the root of all evil").

How much has changed?

the cattle have better conditions to stop them from charging the fences, but we are still taxed, mortgaged and sent to work for the Masonic bosses who sit on their yachts (off Corfu, for example) swigging champers and plotting to make more money (by, for example, buying up Montenegro's aluminium industry for peanuts by liaising with the mafia that run that "government" allegedly with the help of an EU commissar).

Do you think the workers in the Montenegran aluminium plants enjoy good working conditions? Yet they work to enrich a millionaire with Rothschilds connections.

How many of the factory owners, or the owners of the "dark Satanic mills" of England had Rothschild connections?

How many of the EU commissars who are planning our enslavement to a Europe-wide Socialist regime have Rothschild connections?

How many of the banksters growing rich today as they take the world to the brink of meltdown through their greed and corruption have Rothschild connections?

The scenery changes - but the story remains the same.


---

Post Script:


This morning a journal plopped (yes, plopped!) through my letterbox and in it I found an interesting letter from a priest. Rather than worry about the stocks and shares that some prelates think it is their "duty" to invest in, there were a few juicy bits, so let me quote from the end of his letter after he sets the scene of the global economic crash:



"For years we have been told that each family's "wealth" was its home, but no one seems to have stopped to consider the fact that that same belongs to only very few families -- the rest are firmly in the hands of bankers for 20 or 30 years. "If you are good and pay for your house three times over, you can keep it at the end of that time." The injustice in the system (among others) is that one who is usually a wage slave may pay on his home for twenty years. The wealth is fictitious, or for the future at best. However, we spend it all now...

"We live in an economy of unrestrained greed and consumption and it would seem that this logic will soon boomerang back on us... it is immoral to live beyond ones means. It is a question of justice, commutative justice... Those who live continually above their means (by credit card juggling) live in a permanent state of sin. Little do we ever think of this. The opportunistic mortgage companies and banks have only greedily profited from the consumerist lives of many.

"Only when we see clearly the decadence of a system inspired by profit and greed will we ever be able to begin to change our community's organisation: this is the sense of "economy" -- the organisation of our "house". Oikos in Greek.

"May your lives be holy, noble, simple, and infused with peace,

"In Christo,

Fr Doran."


Now there's a man who would happily turn over the tables of the moneylenders in the temple!

Rothschild, Kissinger and the Kosher BNP: the Struggle is One!

Just why did the Murdoch press become the mouthpiece for Nat Rothschild in the recent ballyhoo re. the yacht off Corfu?

Surely going up against a possibly future government minister is bad business sense?

Not when the Rothschilds are business partners in the Murdoch's satellite TV firm BSkyB!

So let's get this straight.

We have one family.

They bankroll Tories and NuLab politicians. They have leverage over the mass media and the banks.

Doesn't this seem more than a little disproportionate?

It seems that the first people on our Home Secretary's list of proscribed people to be banned from entering the UK "for public harmony" should be the Rothschilds.

Of course she'd have to kick a few of them out first.

If the Rothschilds had links to the Armenian genocide (see recent post on Ataturk - aka Atajew) and there is evidence that high level Freemasonry (come on! They have to be in that!) had links to ETA, the Red Brigades etc.

And still the kosherised groups like the BNP think that the threat comes from a few Islamic preachers and their adherents???

911, 7/7 etc. were false flag ops and we should be looking to New York and Tel Aviv for the culprits.

Whilst we're on the subject we hope the biggest war criminal of all (also as luck would have it a Jewish-Zionist-Mason) is banned from UK entry: Henry Kissinger.

When Franco's No. 2 and planned leader of Spain on the Caudillo's death (I forget his name - read FC mag #16, I think it mentions the facts in there, in a book review of Franco's Spain) refused to back down in a diplomatic confrontation with Kissinger and America he was murdered in a "terrorist" plot which used incredible planning and means just to kill one man: in essence we saw even then how the CIA used Spanish/Basque "terrorists" as a cover for ridding themselves of someone who wouldn't roll over and let Spain become "democratic" (i.e. a poodle of America).

So enough Sun editorialising. Enough mimicking the Neo Cons in a Stalinist 'two steps forward one step back.' Enough 'softly softly catchee monkey.'

I can only return to a message we've pushed in FC numerous times:

The threat to our culture, our civilisation, our religion, our freedoms, our way of life comes from the Zionists, who organise illegal wars, cripple us with debt, flood us with drugs, destroy the family...

Even if we look at the barbed issue of Islam, we have to ask who's more of a threat: the "mad mullahs" who are promoted by a Zionist media eager for an eternal bogeyman, backed up by the CIA's "Al Qaeda" myth; or the Asians (Muslim, but also Sikh, Hindu etc.) who wish to integrate.

The biggest threat from coloured immigration comes from the move to a coffee-coloured secularised State, something that Communists push for, something the Capitalists like (hey - we're all consumers!) and something that the Masons approve of as they try to destroy the last vestiges of Christianity.

This melting pot, faggot-ambivalent, ecumenical, social controlling, Big Business led, Masonic State, where the only enemy is "hatred" and "extremism" is our nightmare.

It seems some people are happy to embrace it as long as they get to screech about an "Islamic threat" in the short term for their own profit and prestige.

The ridiculous thing is that the wafer-thin, super-lite Neo Con B.S. pushed by the Israeli Firsters should be laughed at by nationalists. Sad to say the BNP 'supertanker' has been turning around for a good 8 years and is now heading on the same setting as our enemies.

Would it be beneath the security services to use a nationalist party for its own ends? Think of C18. Think of the National Democrats.

Plenty of well meaning people supported those two groupings, yet the hand of State would now be refuted by very few.

As the saying goes, the path to hell is paved with good intentions.

But when you can smell the sulphur or see that the message has become entwined with that of a Satanic minority (Judeo-Masons) then it's time to jump ship before you too sell your soul and are branded by Old Nick! ;-)

Wage & Debt Slavery Endures

Watch last week's BBC Question Time on BBC i-player (available on the BBC website for UK viewers) because it's a revelation.

Right: War Criminal and government buffoon, Geoff Hoon where implausibility meets culpability!

Not only do "the panel," especially the drippy chinless Tory, fail to answer people on the question of the lack of democracy in Stoke-on-Trent, but the government rep totally misunderstands the problem of employment and unemployment.

So let's deal with these issues:

• "DEMOCRACY"

The audience clearly agreed with one gent who spoke out that there was no democracy, in that all the "main" parties made cosy agreements to run affairs in Stoke amongst themselves - and so out of desperation people were voting BNP.

Of course others (notable the Nationalist Truth blog run by ex-BNP Councilor Simon Smith) have argued forcefully that the BNP is a state pressure valve under direction of 5IMon Darby, but it doesn't detract from the fact that people feel that the parties are "all the same."

It might be nice, for example to have a party that opposes the banks, or opposes Zionism etc. (see next post on the Rothschilds!)

None of the panelists seemed to grasp this and a couple ignored the point made and went off into "lack of national identity" and "difficult economic times" (missing the point completely). If anything, the rise of the BNP can be squarely pointed at international politics and the Neo Con agenda of creating a Muslim "bogeyman" courtesy of the CIA false flag op that is "Al Qaeda."

• EMPLOYMENT

Geoff Hoon (the lying shyster viz the illegal war in Iraq who also sent troops to die in ill-prepared kit) showed exactly why politicians are liars and how they twist statistics to present a new "truth" which few people believe.

Remember Jaqcui Smith and her insistence that crime was down - only for her to admit that she felt afraid late at night in London (even with her minders!).

That's a perfect example of how a government can confuse lack of public confidence and the under-reporting of crime with "safer streets."

But let me digress for a moment before I deal with employment (I crave your indulgence dear reader!).

Watch Hoon defend the plan to keep records of every phone call and email! He fails to understand people's concern. The audience is clearly opposed to this. The cost will be a waste. It will create even more Police powers. It will create more opportunities to lose material. It will create more opportunities for hackers or corrupt cops to access private data of individuals, businesses, MPs and more...

Yet Hoon (lap dog that he is!) defends it by saying he would give up lots of civil liberties to prevent death by terrorists! (yawn).

Oh it's akin to Jaqcui Smith dropping her "42 Days Internment" plans until there is a "terrorist strike." False flag op anyone? CIA? Mossad? MI5? I'm sure one will oblige to get these "needed" repressive laws on the books.

On the subject of the greatest civil liberty being the right not to die (as espoused by Hoon and other NuLab Neo Cons) dare I mention gun and knife crime in London and elsewhere?

Why no clamp down on druggy, immigrant gangs and hoodlums? If our right to be safe on the streets is the greatest civil liberty for which he will suspend all reasonable controls on the police and state machinery why aren't the Jamaican, Albanian and other gangs just wiped off the streets?

Because, dear reader, this hyperbole and rhetoric is designed to tweak at our heart strings over dead innocents to get repressive laws enacted.

It's a CON JOB being perpetrated by Neo Cons.

• EMPLOYMENT - HONEST!!!

So let's get back to the issue of employment as defined by the greasy stool pigeon and co-defendent in the upcoming war crimes trials (we can wish).

I headed this section 'employment - honest' because I'd warbled on in the last section about anything but employment, but in reality it should have been 'honest employment' because that (or the lack of it) is what we are dealing with.

Mr. Hoon defends his government's record by stating that we still have "record employment" and that whilst unemployment is due to rise (because of "international events" i.e he wants you to believe it's outside their control) they will be taking "tough action" (newspeak for we'll try and paper over the cracks).

In a sense what is happening is outside Hoon and Co's control -- because they have put the UK under the rule of International Financiers, as we've discovered to our cost in the last few weeks. That is to say, it is outside their control now - not that they can't do anything about it, but they are enslaved to the banking system, the Freemasons who run it and the usury-debt that ensures their total control.

But back to Mr. Hoon's statement on "record employment."

There may be more jobs, just as crime may be officially "down" but this has no bearing on the quality of these jobs or who is employed in them.

After all 5000 jobs picking fruit in Cambridgeshire held by East Europeans has little impact on the population.

Or tell the man laid off from a well-paid manufacturing job or from an academic post that there are 50 shelf-stacking jobs or 25 "McJobs" available in his town.

Quantity counts to Mr. Hoon, maybe that's why so many of his colleagues fill their boots with non-executive posts in big businesses (purely advisory dontcha know!).

So can we expect Mr. Hoon to give up his single job as MP (let's be fair on him and give him the benefit of the doubt viz supplementary jobs with banksters, armament firms etc.) for two or even three jobs flipping burgers, stacking shelves or shovelling sh...? Well, you get the idea.

Mr. Hoon defends the creation of a "Coolie Economy" because there are "more jobs than ever before" that's like saying I'm richer than ever before because instead of a £50 note in my wallet, I have 60 penny coins in a jar.

• REAL FREEDOM

What the politicians do not ever discuss is an economy wherein the majority have real freedom via family businesses, family farms (small holdings), workers' co-operatives and the widespread implementation of guilds with apprentices.

"Employment" can so often mean fitting a square peg into a round hole - by force.

To discuss real freedom, real work and widespread self-employment is anathema to a system which relies on a Coolie Economy and keeping people as wage-slaves, mortgage-debtors and cogs in a usury-banking machine.

Instead of offering more jobs that he wouldn't dream of getting out of bed for, more enslavement to Big Businesses, more "McJobs" that lead to no fulfillment and no reward, the politicians should be carving out a future that offers rewards, freedom, self-fulfillment and strong, secure families.

But then they'd have to stick the knife in on usury-debt and Capitalism.

They can't do that... and then we're back to the non-executive directorships and plumy sinecures enjoyed by so many MPs, supplied by the people who ensnare and enslave us in wage and debt slavery!

Quo Bono Mr Hoon? Quo Bono?

Zionist Oligarch, Rothschilds, NuLab & Tories

This leads me to ask: which of "our" political parties and leaders haven't been bought and sold?

Right: The Rothschilds are Zionist to the core. They buy our politicians. yet the clamour from - ahem - the political parties against this blatant corruption and interference is null and void. Can anyone say "conspiracy?"

Israel's 34^th Anniversary of Independence Coin

Baron Edmond James (Avrahim Binyamin) de Rothschild (1845-1934) is the known as the "Father of the Settlement" (Avi ha-Yishuv). The Independence Day coin 1982/5742 is dedicated to the memory of Edmond de Rothschild and marks the centenary of his first projects in Israel.

Description of the Coin

Front: A portrait of Baron Rothschild with the inscription in Hebrew, "Father of the Jewish Settlement".

Reverse: The State Emblem with the inscription below, "Baron Edmond de Rothschild" and the dates, "1845-1934" in Hebrew and English. Around the rim, "Centenary of His First Settlement Activities in Eretz Israel". The word "Israel" in Hebrew, English and Arabic. The date 1982/5742 and the denomination "10 Sheqalim" or "2 Sheqalim" in Hebrew. The uncirculated silver coin is mintmarked with a 6 pointed star at the bottom. The proof coins are mintmarked with a Hebrew 'mem' at the bottom.

Which of them dares to oppose the Freemasons, the Zionists, the Neo Cons and Israel? Which of them doesn't have dirty money from the exotic land of bakhanda?

None spring to mind. Not a single one!

That's the beauty of democracy. Pick any party you want: as long as it's acceptable to our Masonic overlords.

You may ask why the Rothschilds seek to bankroll Tory and NuLab. Just as they bankrolled Napoleonic France and Imperial Britain in 1815... because money is nothing to them: but being on the side of the winner (or rather, pocketing the winner) means years of power, prestige and freedom to control money in their banking houses.

Wake up nationalist!

UNDERSTAND.

See who the real overlords are! None of the political parties (repeat: NOT A SINGLE ONE!) will have the guts or freedom to tell you these facts.

Remember: all the articles below are from the London Times. Not a "neo-nazi" or "anti-semitic" rumour site. As such, you know the basics are true, and not only that, you know that these are the sanitised and legally-acceptable versions.

Our politicians (sitting MPs and "opposition" of all hues) are bought and paid for. Read Belloc's The Party System and you will understand that parliament corrupts even the handful of decent men who rarely get there.

Public opposition to Zionism and Freemasonry should be the very least we expect of any genuine opposition politician. Anything else is meaningless and mere system politics.


Links:

The Tories, the Oligargh and the Rothschilds


Oh, and New Labour are at it too:


Mandelson and the Zionist Oligarch
Mandelson's Same Oligarch/Rothschild Deal
Mandelson's Rothschild Freebies


And even the London Times covers the moneylenders and the Rothschilds (albeit sanitised):


Moneylenders and the Rothschilds


Again, a highly sanitised (from Zionist Wikipedia) but interesting glimpse of the Rothschilds family history:

The Rothschild History


Why don't they all bugger off and retire to some country estate in Eastern Europe with their ill-gotten gains? ;-)

Feeding Anti-Semitism by Their Actions

I hate to come over all Anti-Semite, but there appears to be a pattern emerging in the recent round of "political donations" afflicting the parties.

First we had the Abrahams Scandal involving someone (a confirmed bachelor no less) important enough to be visited by Israeli officials.

Then came Peter Hain whose donors include a diamond merchant called Nagel (and who it now appears did favours for Tescos - real name Cohens - a client of his election-fund manager).

Now we understand the Tory George Osbourne is embroiled in another donation scandal, and money includes some from Rothschilds.

Sheesh.

What on earth will the Kosher-Tories like Mad Mel Phillips say? And the lefty Neo Cons like Aaronovitch?

No doubt these little, annoying links and facts will be dismissed as "Anti-Semitic" so I'd just like to distance myself from any such aspersions.

Perish the thought.

Link:
Abrahams Scandal.
Hain/Nagel Scandal.
Hain/Tescos Scandal.