The 'War on Terror': A Neo Con Zionist Conspiracy of Lies

When will idiots, liberals and Neo-Cons ever learn?

Afghanistan: unwinnable and stupid war against people previously backed by CIA, with no link to 911. Corrupt pro-Western govt. put in place with links to heroin trade.
Iraq: unjustifiable and stupid war against a people with no link to 911 who kept "Islamicists" in check. Chaos created in which 'terrorists' multiply.
Libya: unjustifiable and stupid war against a people who fought "Islamicists" and kept them in check. Chaos ensues in which "Islamicists" (our erstwhile allies in the war, armed and trained by CIA etc) turn on Europeans, and spread war southwards.
Syria: unjustifiable and stupid war in which rebels are armed and trained by CIA etc. to bring chaos to an anti-Zionist country which had kept "Islamicists" in check.
Mali: Civil War amplified by "Islamicists" trained and armed by CIA in Libya, drawing in the French (and UK/USA as in Libya).
Saudi Arabia: Extremist Muslim dictatorship from which most of the "911 suspects" came from which supresses its people. No war.
Israel: Extremist, racist, genocidal state which breaks international law with impunity and has broken untold UN resolutions. Its agents were stopped in NYC on 911 with traces of explosives on them. No war.

One is tempted to think that the reason the CIA et al went into Libya, as well as to bring down an anti-Zionist and anti-usury nation, was to help 'Muslim extremists' there spread their agenda across North Africa and so create another, new chapter for their 'War on Terror' and so ensure money keeps flowing into the military big businesses, Zionist pressure groups and similar.

If all this confuses you, ask yourself this one question:

IF THE MAIN JUSTIFICATION FOR THE 'WAR ON TERROR' IS TO FIGHT 'MILITANT ISLAM' why oh why then have "the West" armed, trained and helped those very same Islamicists in Libya since the 1980s, and in Syria since the Civil War began?

IF THE MAIN JUSTIFICATION FOR THE 'WAR ON TERROR' IS FOR REVENGE ON 911 why oh why then have the states with the strongest links, Saudi Arabia and Israel still retained the status as America's greatest allies.

It all has the stench of Orwell's Big Brother lying to us.

Even a cursory look at the geo-political alliances, adventures and objectives should make you realise that we are being lied to on a grand scale!

Justifying Terrorism: Hague's Post-Bomb Regime Change Mantra

So terrorists (no doubt CIA led terrorists - that's state-sponsored terrorism isn't it?) have now killed four of, what the media are crowing are, President Assad's 'inner circle' and this - they also tell us, egged-on by hard line Zionists in Washington and London -means the regime is weakening and should change.

This would seem like not only a celebration of terrorism, but as an argument for regime-change by terrorism and the idea that terrorism is justified to bring about political change. A dangerous ploy just prior to the London 2012 Olympic Games!

Are people like William Hague really arguing that a terrorist bomb that would take out four Tory ministers (ministers backing the war in Afghanistan) would be justifiable? Would it usher in regime change? Would it mean that Westminster autocracy was crumbling? If Afghan patriots did it would people like Hague call it justified?

No? I didn't think so.

So why the hell are they gloating about (CIA led) terrorists in Syria?

Remember the British state also paid for and supplied munitions for terrorist attacks (by "Islamacists") in Libya against Gaddafi decades ago.

"The West" does not have clean hands. Our governments are still waging a clandestine war against any regimes they do not like. Yet they have the nerve to point the finger at such regimes who seek to defend themselves.

That's chutzpah. In every sense!

Nationalists should not be fooled. Afghanistan. Iraq. Libya. Syria. We are seeing Zionist terror tactics used against Arab peoples who pose us no threat whatsoever. None of it will end well.

French Mercenaries Captured in Syria

French mercenaries - French sources for the arms. Surely this is an act of war against a sovereign state with no UN Resolution/backing and so a war crime?

No wonder the Zionist Sarkozy is one of the least popular French leaders ever! He has fomented armed rebellion and terrorism for his paymasters in Israel, certainly not for the betterment of the French people whose economic plight is similar to our own, even slightly worse being inside the dreaded Euroland.

BBC's Syrian Brainwashing: Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad

How the BBC Works

On the BBC last night there were two news stories.

In one, balaclava clad men were using weapons against the army of the state they grew up in. The army of that state were fighting back against them, sending troops into their towns. The balaclava clad men, who shot at state soldiers, were the heroes for the BBC, who showed them being cheered on, by only a couple of hundred people at most, in a town.

BBC's freedom fighter?

In the next story some balaclava clad men were using weapons against the army of the state they grew up in. The army of that state were fighting back sending troops into their towns. The balaclava men, who shot at state soldiers, were the terrorists for the BBC, who said they 'only enjoyed support in a few enclaves.'

One of these stories was about Syria and the Free Syrian Army which shoots Syrian soldiers (and civilians) and the other was about Northern Ireland and the Real IRA which shoots British soldiers (and civilians).

Yet the BBC tells us one are heroes, freedom fighters, brave patriots fighting occupation and oppression, whilst the others are extremists, terrorists, murderers seeking to upset peace, opposed by the majority and with no justification in their actions. The language in one report is a complete reversal of the language in the other report, which goes to show how the BBC plays the British public, pushing us to support "balaclava men" when it suits them, the Secret State and the political classes, but to oppose "balaclava men" that suits all those vested interests.

Funnily enough, in the latest Private Eye there is a report on how the British Ambassador to Bahrain sent out a statement congratulating Bahrain for putting down its uprising, and stating how Saudi Arabia was correct to send in vehicles and men to help put down the uprising. The same British State is now busy telling us how wrong Syria is to try and put down its own uprising!

Or let's put it this way, when does the BBC think an Arab with a bazooka is good: when he's killing Syrian troops. Would they say the same if he was killing Israeli, Iraqi, Afghani or Saudi troops?

So to recap, it's Syrian armed insurrectionists good, Irish armed insurrectionists bad.

Bahraini/Saudi crushing rebellion good, Syrian crushing rebellion bad.

And what's the news just in: four legs good, two legs bad?

Just so long as the BBC is there to tell us!

BBC Inside-Job Conspiracy Theory - on 911 or Syria Bombs?

• Bombs in Damascas: BBC reports they could be a government "inside job."
• Bombs (airplanes) in New York: BBC attack 'conspiracies' of a government "inside job."

As always, it's not so much as what the facts are, but what suits the ZIONIST agenda.

Open your eyes to media lies.

Mossad/CIA Death Squads Stirring up Syrian rebels

Mossad and CIA active in Syria:




Tip of my deerstalker to Maurice Pinay Blog

Terrorist State Raids Sovereign Nation

So America has invaded yet another sovereign nation and attacked - and killed! - civilians.

We shouldn't be surprised.

If Syrian helicopters attacked a town in Texas or New York do you think America would simply make a disgusted statement?

Or do you think America and its Israeli Lobby would sabre rattle and seek to hit back at the aggressors?

America is a Terrorist State.

It has launched illegal wars and so, by definition, its leaders are war criminals.

Yet it still has the brassneck to support a country with illegal nuclear weapons which has ignored/broken UN Resolutions (Israel), whilst seeking to talk of war against a country building nuclear power stations (just like the UK!): Iran.

Should any of us believe anything the terrorist USA says about anyone else?

If a statement came out of Washington DC or Tel Aviv stating that the sea is wet, I'd have to pop down to the coast just to check for myself...