Visit the FC Shop!
Showing posts with label Tescos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tescos. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

Tesco's Back Down on Poof-Fest - Keep Up the Pressure

Plenty to lose...
After a concerted campaign, Tesco's have backed down from an ongoing sponsorship deal with the London Walking Around with Our Arses Hanging Out, Leather Clad Degenerate Scumbags and Pierced Butch Dykes Rally (aka London "Pride").

This followed their decision to stop sponsoring events by a cancer charity, and the remarks of one of their head honchos that Christians opposed to "homosexual marriage" [sic] were extremists.

As the commentator Francis Phillips explains, they will still back sodomite groups, they will still back the poof rally this year and (to my knowledge) they have not sacked their R&D boss who made the comments against Christians.

So at the very least all decent people should continue boycotting Tesco's during 2012 - and if you get the chance tell them why.

Even more reasons to "send 'em back!"
They could have pulled the plug on the homo-fest this year (which breaks the law on public decency and blasphemy every year), but have chosen to stand by it.

So whilst this is a great victory, and shows what can be done with some well concerted pressure by the majority against a shrill but bank-rolled minority of degenerates, we must not be complacent.

Keep up the pressure and keep up the boycott, at least during 2012, and be ready with the next campaign. The next business that thinks it can promote sodomites and undermine our values must feel the wrath of the "men of goodwill" via pushing our message out on friendly blogs, websites and all the usual social media channels (not to mention sending emails to the companies in question).

It's a battle won. But the war goes on.

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

BOYCOTT TESCO'S Christians Opposed to 'Gay Marriage' are not EVIL

Tesco's head of research and development, Nick Lansley, has said that those Christians who oppose "gay marriage" (sic) are "evil."

Not wrong. Not misguided. Not mistaken. EVIL.

May I suggest that everyone who is opposed to "gay marriage" do not step foot inside Tesco's from now on!

We cannot allow people who are defending the sanctity of marriage to be abused in this way by a head honcho at Tesco's, who would no doubt be sacked if he said homosexuality was disordered and laws promoting "homosexual equality" were evil. As it was, he was not sacked for his perverted views against a majority of Christians, who are still a majority in the UK.

It is time for all of us to make a stand and this is something which everyone of us can do, and we can get our friends and relatives to do it too.

It's no big deal. Even if it's just pointing them towards some other supermarket. It is one single step, not perfect, but it might make a difference. Tell your friends and relatives. If you attend a church, spread the word there too, even ask for a small notice to be put on the noticeboard or in the newsletter.

It may not change the world, but we must empower those people who are sick of the onslaught against marriage, our Faith and our traditions so that we become an army of people who make the money men realise they cannot attack us with impunity.

Every time they speak out: we must be there. Every assault on our way of life: we must repel.

In this times when money is an even more precious commodity for families and businesses, let's hurt these callous scumbags where it hurts - in their tills.

Every family turned away from Tesco's is £80 - £150 pounds per week taken out of their grasp.

SPREAD THE WORD. Shop elsewhere. Get friends, relatives, work colleagues, members of your community to shop elsewhere.

Bring this up in conversations over the garden fence, at the water cooler. Publish it on your blog, in facebook, on twitter and wherever else you can spread the word to as many people as possible.

We will not be attacked. We will not be besmirched. Will will not face the calumnies of big businessmen and the pink mafia.

Will will defend marriage. And we will boycott Tesco's.

Thanks to Integrity and Action blog for passing on this story.

To quote their blog entry:

A study last month showed that only six places of worship out of more than 40,000 across the country want to host civil partnership ceremonies. 

Give it a few years and this will be foisted on more and more churches! That is how the liberal sickness and moral cancer spreads. Unless we draw the line in the sand today.

Thursday, 10 November 2011

Tesco Drops Cancer Charity To Fund Homosexual Rally

From Integrity and Action Blog:

Tesco drops sponsorship of cancer research to fund London Gay Pride

By Deacon Nick, on November 9th,2011

The Tesco supermarket chain has ended its ten year partnership with Cancer Research to join Smirnoff Vodka as the headline sponsors of London gay pride.

Before looking at the details of Tesco’s sponsorship of London Gay Pride lets look at some basic facts –Tesco has stopped funding research into the treatment and cure of cancers that effects 1 in 3 people in the UK to sponsor a two day gay jamboree that directly effects 1.5% of the UK population.

Marketing Week reports:

‘Tesco has signed a deal to become a major sponsor of London Pride,the UK’s largest gay festival,as it outlines plans to host its biggest ever event in the capital.

Tesco will also host a family area designed to provide families attending the event with a ‘safe,relaxed and chilled out’ place with family-friendly entertainment and activities aimed at younger children.

The supermarket will also contribute to funding the free-to-attend event,which is organised by volunteers.

Tesco joins Smirnoff as headline sponsor for the annual event and builds on Tesco’s presence at the 2011 festival.

The news comes shortly after Tesco ended its 10-year partnership with Cancer Research’s Race for Life fundraising event.

Pride London is already the largest Gay Pride event in the UK and it is extending its carnival route and adding a second day to the festival for 2012,when it will host the global festival WorldPride 2012.

Andrew Higginson,CEO of retailing services at Tesco,says,“Tesco is the UK’s largest private employer,and a very diverse international organisation where everybody is welcome. Our Out at Tesco team will be working closely with Pride London to ensure next year’s event is even more fun.”

Francis Philips of The Catholic Herald writes:

‘Why on earth is Tesco promoting an event like this? Tesco is a supermarket;its remit has been to sell good-quality food and other items at very reasonable prices,and in this it has been hugely successful.

Why has it now aligned itself with an aggressive political organisation such as Pride London? Why has it given up its sponsorship of Cancer Research? Or at least,if it has given up this sponsorship,why hasn’t it taken up with another mainstream charity such as the British Legion or Age UK? There are thousands of ex-servicemen and wounded soldiers needing help in this country,and millions of elderly people in danger of neglect. They are a fundamental part of the fabric of our society – the kind of fabric that Tesco should be reflecting.Why,why,why?’

David Skinner of Anglican Mainstream wrote to Andrew Higginson and Philip Clarke,the CEO,in protest.

“I understand… that Tesco is sponsoring London Pride and setting aside ‘family areas as safe places where children can go’. For Tesco to sponsor a tiny homosexual minority (according to the Office for National Statistics) that amounts to little more than one per cent of the population…[it] will be showing the utmost contempt for a large proportion of British society that still adheres,more or less,to the morality and values of the Ten Commandments.”

Apparently he received a stock response to this,merely saying that Tesco’s is “inclusive” and that “everyone is welcome”.

He now urges as many people as possible to write direct to:

Sir Richard Broadbent,Chairman,Tesco PLC,
New Tesco House,
Delamere Road,
Cheshunt,Herts EN8 9SL

Sunday, 15 June 2008

Free People Will Always Defend Faith, Family, Nation

Why are we Distributists?

Why are we Ruralists?

Why are we Nationalists?

Right: The latest statement from the EU on why other countries must continue to ratify the Lisbon Treaty.

Because we believe all three give freedom and identity to the peoples of Europe -- and elsewhere for that matter!

We believe that the state should not interfere unnecessarily with families and communities.

We believe that people, that is communities and families, should be as self-sufficient as possible.

What could be greener in this age of ecological worriers? What could better for the "carbon footprint" counters of medialand?

But it goes deeper than that. Our people, crammed into tower blocks, council estates and terraced rabbit hutches have, step by step, been disenfranchised and homogenised.

This has been a process over centuries which began in earnest with the enclosing of the land, the industrial revolution and the cramming of our people into slums, even into basements as a means for a few industrialists and bankers to make the equivalent of billions.

Profits before people. It's been their mantra ever since.

The process reached its zenith with mass coloured immigration which destroyed even the urbanised communities which retained a portion of the identity and belonging that our peoples once felt down to their very core.

Of course its not possible to undo hundreds of years of rampant Capitalism, or the 'profits before people' creed which has seen our people shoved around for the benefit of those whose sole concern is money, those who have no national pride or belonging (the New Unhappy Lords that GK Chesterton wrote about, and the bankers with their Hebrew snouts in ledgers that Dr Saunders Lewis wrote about).

But where our people (Europeans) retain some identity, in the rural areas, the vote against the EU in Ireland, France and elsewhere was strongest (as shown in the link below).

The metropolitan elites, the chattering classes, which are known in the UK by such London locales as Islington and Primrose Hill, are pro-EU because they know they will benefit financially. They have no national identity to speak of, their first loyalty is to money, then to their "metrosexual" lifestyle and for the older generation to the local Lodge.

Of course in rural areas, families and communities tend to be less multi-culti which means they retain not only a sense of national pride and duty to the country, but they also retain a Christian identity. This is something I have witnessed myself not only here, but also in Ireland, Spain, France, Italy, Romania and elsewhere.

This is why our chattering classes embrace the EU. It's also why they embrace multi-culturalism and seek to force it on the rest of us.

They want our loyalties to be to Sony and Pepsi, Vodafone and Tescos.

The very idea of Faith, Family, Nation is anathema to them.

Faith: Christianity is at best "medieval" and at worst "bigoted" and to be overturned, ignored or changed to be just one of many in a pick-n-mix melting pot which is also "tolerant" of homosexuality, abortion etc.

Family: This cornerstone of any decent nation has been willfully neglected and attacked by the political elites to the extent that the multi-surname "family" and the proliferation of "partners" is now the norm in many areas. Of course the latter is also a pc agenda to put homosexual "couples" on a par with cohabitees, married automatons with no kids (but two careers and two cars!), and traditional families who are busy trying to make sure we as a people don't die out.

Nation: Well, the very EU agenda is seeking to destroy all vestige of nationhood throughout Europe! And it is those very communities which hold onto their remnants of Faith, Family and Nation - however imperfect or warped by decades of media spin - that have delivered such a shock to the political, big business and multi-culti classes.

So the next time someone tells you that Ruralism, Distributism and Nationalism are "backwards" just tell them if the alternative is to move forwards into EU slavery, police state controls and total loss of identity, then we'll be glad to move "backwards."

Left: GK Chesterton, "The Defender" who shot through the limp arguments of liberals, socialists, multi-cultis, Capitalists and the political class with tenacity and wit.

Besides which as has been attributed to GK Chesterton when some tom fool told him that you cannot turn the clock back he said "Sir, you clearly know nothing about clocks."

As GKC also said, in the topsy turvey world it is the Traditionalist who is the Revolutionary. And if GKC thought his world was topsy turvey, what would he say of ours???


Link:
The Rural and the Poor Defeated the EU

Sunday, 2 March 2008

Is Might Right?


There's a saying which is used by some in the nationalist movement: might is right.

I have never agreed with it, and I'll tell you why.

We all know that crumbling morality is a problem in Britain and Europe. However strongly you feel about that or whatever stance you take, few will contend that falling moral standards (some might say a collapse in moral standards) have had a huge impact on society.

Can any point to drug addicts, gun-wielding gangs, lawless streets etc. and say that the collapse in the family hasn't played its role?

Even black activists and trendy social commentators today are admitting that the lack of black fathers who are actually present in black families has a huge impact and creates so much lawlessness in that young black children (as well as being alienated and being somewhat rootless) have no positive male role models.

This will come as little surprise to nationalists (though they know the problem stems from mass, uncontrolled immigration, cultural and racial alienation and a very real 'clash of cultures' which pre-dates any Neo Con nonsense).

So, we might ask, where our own people stand in regards to the collapse of the family, to single parent families, to rocketing divorce rates and to large scale abortions.

We all know people whose parents have divorced, and many of us know people who have divorced or even re-married, so it's not always easy to speak openly about such things. Yet it's very few (outside the commissars and pc brigade) who can state, hand on heart, that wide scale divorce is a good thing and is beneficial to the children involved and to wider society per se.

G.K. Chesterton once said that frivolous divorce will result in frivolous marriage.

Might it also be said that the modern trend for cohabiting, for unmarried single mothers, for men who walk away from pregnant girlfriends etc. etc. is the offspring of widespread divorce? For if we as a society have no sense of fidelity, loyalty, duty etc. within marriage - why should we as a society have any sense of fidelity, loyalty, duty before marriage?

Of course the frontal assault on marriage with this nonsense of "civil partnerships" is another way in which the powers-that-be, via their liberalising laws on marriage, push our society to a totally amoral situation.

We now have an 'anything goes' (media-termed) "metrosexual" society or as arch-liberal, Satanist and WW2 Allied-spy Aleister Crowley (a metrosexual before his time!) would label it, a 'do what thou wilt' society.

The politicians then wonder why crime is out of control, why the police cannot cope, and why the prisons are overfull.

In the shadow of this, of course, the State pushes for Big Brother controls. ID cards and DNA databases are just the thin end of the wedge and crime and "terrorism" (both created by the politicians and their actions) are the excuses given for yet more State powers.

Not only could they say 'Might is Right' about this Orwellesque State, but they keep planning (over and over again) to make themselves even mightier when it comes to social control.

The politicians do not seem to realise (though the Bilderbergers, Trilaterals, high level Freemasons etc. surely do!) that these powers are wrong because they do not treat the root cause of the lawlessness, and it is the State which has been at fault and the cause of the immorality and amorality in society.

I'll give an analogy that the simple-minded can understand (essential in today's attention-span deficit society) just in case any Hillary Clinton supporters are looking in.

Imagine Jerry Springer being seen to cause familial break-up, then we are told that new powers are given to Jerry Springer (a Zionist and politician I may add!) to have extra bouncers on his show, which will also now be shown twice daily.

You may scoff, but this is what is being pushed on us dumb goyim cattle by our lords and masters as more Police State powers are passed, whilst marriage is constantly undermined and attacked.

So what, you may ask does all this have to do with "Might is Right" and the purveyors of this worldview?

Well, surely if might is indeed right, then we should roll over and die, for the State is all mighty and they are forcing through laws on societal and moral issues with their powers like never before.

Is homosexuality wrong? Our government forced through laws to "prove" the contrary against the views of the public.

Are needless Zionist wars wrong? Our government forced us into wars to benefit Israel and the Neo Cons against the views of the public.

Is mass immigration wrong? Our government forced it upon us against the views of the public.

If "might is right" then our government, America, Israel, the Neo Cons and more are the ultimate 'right' in this world surely?

If "might is right" then the Soviets with their Kosher Commissars and the Americans with their bankster-backers were ultimately proved right in the ashes of 1945 (Dresden proving their ultimate right to rule us).

If "might is right" then the abortionist with his poisons, knives and suction machines is right and the little innocent in her mother's womb is wrong.

Might is right is a self-evident nonsensical position. Might is most often used by those in the wrong to justify their position and to silence those voices who prove them wrong.

Money is the root of all evil. That essential truth may be close to 2000 years old, but it remains no less true today.

The son who puts his mother in a nursing home to sell her property and pocket the proceeds is no less evil than a politician who sells out his country on immigration, abortion, foreign wars etc. then gets a cosy sinecure from a bank or multinational when he retires.

Yet according to the might is right creed, both are to be acclaimed because both use their power to push through their ends.

Money is the root of all evil, moreover those who will do and say anything to gain money have sold their souls to evil.

In this age the ultimate evil lies with the power of the banksters and the multinationals, for they on the one hand create money out of thin air as a debt to strangle nations, communities and families, and on the other hand they create huge monopolies and a homogeneous mass of people across the globe.

Right: Think of the many people who work all hours, limit the number or even go without children so they can pay the mortgage (to a bank), pay the fuel bills (to a multinational) and buy food (from a multinational). Are we really any different from the proles who were worked to death, forced to rent homes from the factory-owners and forced to buy shoddy food from the factory-owners?

That is why we have politicians that attack the family via divorce, abortion and homosexuality, that undermine our communities via mass immigration, that rip apart communities and families through drug abuse, that destroy other nations through illegal Zionist wars.

Why? Because virtually every politician that matters is already bought and sold by the super-powerful banksters and the multinationals (inc the media barons).

Tony Blair is only the latest in a (very!) long line of traitor politicians who has left office to get well-paid sinecures and political baubles from a Masonic system that rewards its own, that rewards treachery and moral cowardice, that uses the vast power, vast wealth and total control of its assets to keep a morally vacuous system trundling along.

Even in office so many of the political class (in and out of power, establishment and anti-establishment) are selling-out whilst on the take and/or fiddling their expenses, cowardice makes sure they toe certain lines for fear of losing lucrative incomes whilst greed sees them pocketing funds.

More often than not those out of office, especially if they want to gain office, do exactly the same and mirror the actions and the attitudes of those in office - thus the blind believers in democracy are robbed of their false hopes before they are presented with them.

So, to summarise, if you believe that 'Might is Right' you must be an ardent follower of Stalin, Tony Blair and the Zionist Neo Cons, you must admire the son who profits from his mothers institutionalisation, you must admire the mass-murdering rich abortionist, you must admire the drugs gangs that rule parts of our cities, and you must admire those who try to turn this country into a controlled, watched, suppressed molten mass of TV-watching, Sun-reading automatons.

If you believe that 'Might is Right' then you have to worship the Bilderbergers, the Trilaterals, the Freemasons, Illuminati etc. because these people have had more belief in their ideals than we have - they have managed to flip society on its head and get all the rotten ideals that we should hate accepted by the mass of people, even if only for the sake of a quiet life.

Even more than that you must be a huge fan of the international financiers and banksters - for theirs is the mightiest and most powerful position in the world. They can buy whatever influence, whatever group, whatever political system they need to.

The banksters really are the lords of the earth.

I have always believed that right is right and that wrong is wrong. No amount of pounds, dollars or shekels can convince me that abortion, immigration, homosexuality, drug abuse etc. are right nor that those powerful enough to push these cancers on a long-suffering nation are anything but criminals dressed up in gilt-edged finery given false praise by a media owned by Masonic press barons.

In this world where might is already "right" (i.e. perceived to be right, for they buy their influence) and the duplicitous bribed by baubles politicians and editors would do well to remember the 2000 year-old words of Jesus Christ, whom so many of them pay meaningless lip service to:

"But let your statement be, 'Yes, yes ' or 'No, no'; anything beyond these is of evil."

In other words, when you say yes - mean it! When you say no - mean it! Be loyal to the truth and put away the lies.

What a revolutionary principle!

Perhaps if people thought that the Truth is Right rather than Might is Right we might do away with the rich liars, Masonic manipulators and their paid hirelings which keep us fed on lies and subdued.

Tell the dad denied access to his children; tell the family whose home is repossessed by the bank; tell the Palestinian whose family has just been killed by the Israelis; tell the American people who are going to have another servant of the banks and Israel thrust upon them that "Might is Right" and they may well laugh at you.

I certainly will.


Link:
Yes yes, no no
Wikipedia on Might is Right and the Satanist link

Sunday, 13 January 2008

Feeding Anti-Semitism by Their Actions

I hate to come over all Anti-Semite, but there appears to be a pattern emerging in the recent round of "political donations" afflicting the parties.

First we had the Abrahams Scandal involving someone (a confirmed bachelor no less) important enough to be visited by Israeli officials.

Then came Peter Hain whose donors include a diamond merchant called Nagel (and who it now appears did favours for Tescos - real name Cohens - a client of his election-fund manager).

Now we understand the Tory George Osbourne is embroiled in another donation scandal, and money includes some from Rothschilds.

Sheesh.

What on earth will the Kosher-Tories like Mad Mel Phillips say? And the lefty Neo Cons like Aaronovitch?

No doubt these little, annoying links and facts will be dismissed as "Anti-Semitic" so I'd just like to distance myself from any such aspersions.

Perish the thought.

Link:
Abrahams Scandal.

Hain/Nagel Scandal.

Hain/Tescos Scandal.

Thursday, 28 June 2007

Capitalists + Socialists = Slavery

Why is it those born with a silver spoon in their mouth are always so keen to tell the rest of us how "property is theft" and the government should take our rights, our property and our freedom from us (aka Socialism)?

I was chatting to a work colleague today and he brought up the example of a friend of his family. This lad comes from a wealthy family. He has always had everything bought for him, and had his university fees paid.

He became a druggy hippy, doped-up more often than not. He dropped out of uni and now travels around on various "right on" campaigns, most of it bank-rolled by mummy and daddy, backed up by hand-outs via the tax-payer.

Of course these kinds of examples are well known. Little mummy's boys and girls all gunked up and traveling the world to fight Capitalism, whilst all-too-Capitalist jobs and properties pay for their lifestyle via mater and pater.

Of course this mirrors the fact that since its inception, Socialism has been bank-rolled by the mega-rich and Capitalist corporations (which takes us onto the whole Kosher nature of Capitalism and Socialism) e.g. in the run-up to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

There was an example in a journal recently of the major writer against "globalisation" being published by one of the huge publishing houses - a typical multinational big business!

Many would say, and I would be inclined to agree, that both Socialism and Capitalism aren't about "the people" - neither give two figs for us proles - but about keeping a group of select few (chosen few?) in power.

Capitalism worships the Dollar, Socialism worships the State - but both are against all natural and normal instincts which provide for well-balanced and peaceful communities and nations.

The family becomes an inconvenience, faith becomes "superstition," race becomes "hateful," nationalism becomes "backwards" and so on - not that Capitalism or Socialism is against misusing any of these in a sentimental way when they need to (the ends always justify the means for the Terrible Twins of Capitalism and Socialism).

Years ago Hilaire Belloc wrote that we were headed for the Servile State.

Capitalism and Socialism, according to Belloc, were both headed for systems whereby the workingman would become little more than a cog in a machine.

Little could Belloc have realised that things would get so bad. The rich, the big businesses, the banks own more and more - and the people are mortgaged and in debt as never before.

Meanwhile Socialism has crept in everywhere with more government control, more needless laws encroaching our basic and ancient freedoms, more anti-national, anti-family and anti-race laws passed.

And who runs this Capitalist/Socialist nightmare which is attacking everything we hold dear?

Gordon Brown's government is up to its eyeballs with the "usual suspects," as well as being in the pockets of all the usual vested interests.

A coterie of Zionists and big businessmen are in this "new government" already.

I already touched upon the role of Sir Ronald Cohen (taking over fundraising from Lord Levy!). Now we find out that Gordon Brown has started a business advisory council - to give the government advice on new laws.

This body is crammed full of big businessmen and corporate fat cats, including Sir Alan Sugar as well as head honchos Rose and Leahy from Marks and Spencers and Tescos respectively. All Jewish big businesses thus far... plus there's Damon Buffini who, like Sir Ronald Cohen, is a multi-millionaire because of asset stripping companies (aka chucking workingmen on the dole for profit).

Just what this country needs! More laws passed for the benefit of the mega-rich, mostly kosherised, big businesses!

Meanwhile Brown's deputy is 'Ms.' Harriet Harman (pictured) - like so many other Labour bigwigs, the product of rich parents, private fee-paying schools etc. She also chose to send her children to private schools.

As I've said before, why is it those in charge of state schools, the NHS etc. so often choose not to use them? Because they can buy their way out? It is a system built on hypocrisy!

And our new Foreign Secretary is David Milliband, whose rich Marxist Jewish parents "fled Europe" and owned multi-million property in London...

To add to this "Champagne Kosher Socialism" Miliband's brother Ed is also in the cabinet.

Capitalism and Socialism are two sides of the same coin. Nationalists have said that for many decades now.

The thing is, these days, they don't even try and hide their differences in some kind of cold-war-era charade.

Capitalism and Socialism are now bosom buddies, with police state powers going cap in hand with the rule of the bankers.

It would seem this synthesis of our enemies (most acutely observed in the European Union) is hastening the day when they think they will rule all (brushing aside the wishes of whole populations - like France and the Netherlands - as they rush headlong on their way to their nirvana).

Seems like we'll have more Socialist overlords from our moneyed elites for the foreseeable future passing yet more laws which restrict our freedoms...


Link:
The Servile State by Hilaire Belloc

Tuesday, 17 April 2007

Boycott Cohens

Tesco has announced huge profits for another year, in the billions.

A great programme on BBC1 TV last night (Shopping the Supermarkets) showed how Tesco's was due to destroy the traditional nature of yet another English town which had a thriving, traditional high street (and Friends of the Earth explained how Tesco's bribes local councils).

I used to run a shop in a small town, a stone's throw from Slough and Eton (what an unequal pair!), which was hit by supermarket opening.

I have seen the damage done. I have seen a community destroyed - a town centre by-passed by roaring traffic en route to the 'stack em high, sell 'em cheap' philosophy of the supermarkets.

No need for local expertise. No need for personal service. No need for small businesses. No need for businesses that pay local suppliers a decent price.
BOW DOWN AT THE ALTAR OF CAPITALISM YOU PROLES!

£1 in ever £8 "we" spend, as a nation, is in Tesco's!

What an indictment of modern Britain.

Would quite so many nationalists, patriots etc. shop at Tesco's were is named after its founder instead of a bizarre amalgamated name.

The next time you, your spouse or a relative say "we're going to Tesco's" tell them I AM BOYCOTTING COHEN'S SHOP.

In the short term, if you must, seek out another supermarket. In the medium term, seek out a medium-sized supplier if you must.

But why not try using some small, localised businesses from time-to-time?

Local butchers and fruit n veg barrows, just two examples, can offer great value for money, and offer good knowledge and value.

Shop around! Search out a good farmers' market, or a town that holds a market day...

There are alternatives!

Please don't shop at Cohen's [aka Tesco's].


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com