Swastikas in North London?

This banner by "American Israelis for Peace" is of course, not in North London.

But I wonder what would happen if it were displayed there.

None of the symbols are illegal (no, not even the Kabbalistic black magic Star of Ephraim) and as the banner's makers are Jews, it could hardly be called "anti-Semitic."

Yet you and I know that if such a banner were displayed in North London, the institutionally-pc police, acting on the orders of their bosses and the politicians (who meet for cosy chats at the Lodge), would probably say it was illegal on the grounds of racial aggravation or breaching the peace.

Kerching. Who pays the piper calls the tune.

Bob 'TV Nazi' Holness, St Stephan Lawrence and Murdered Arabs

Bob "Der Fuhrer" Holness

It is a little known fact that some people made official complaints to ITV (or whatever it was called back then) about the (recently deceased) Blockbuster host Bob Holness. It seemed on greeting new contestants he would fling his arm up in the air and they said this was "nazi".

Can I Have a P Please Adolf?

Is there nothing more absurd in this world?

Just the other day I saw a tweet from the Holocaust Educational Trust babbling on about Stephan Lawrence, and how terrible his murder was etc. etc. These are the same people who treat the mass murder, concentration camps, torture, expulsion and discriminatory laws used against the Palestinian people for over half a century as perfectly fine, and any attempt to equate that or the murder of millions by the Communists with their HolyHoax is itself a "hate crime" and proof of "anti-Semitism."

Ed Balls on his Blackbusters policy

Yet the wily old Zionoid was free to equate St Stephen Lawrence with his aged hoax, because he chose to do so, and he no doubt thinks this will 'lift up' his HolyHoax. Heaven forbid that we European-Whites should ever treat the non-European guests in Europe as badly as the Jewish "Israelis" treat the indigenous Arabs of those parts! And yet we patriots are lambasted for our "racism" when we say we are against coloured immigration by the very same vested interests who come out with the old canard that Israel is an "island of democracy." You couldn't make it up!

Isn't it funny that millions of Rwandans and Ukrainians can be wiped out, or an entire nation like Armenia obliterated, and the HolyHoax always retains it's topmost place, being taught in our schools (when we had no role other than to "liberate" Jewry). To try and equate their Holyhoax with anything else (even the 100 million killed by Communism) has been condemned by St Deborah Lipstadt as a form of anti-Semitism. 

Having their Kosher-Cake and Eating It

Yet when it suits their aims and they want to look "all inclusive," instead of practising racial separatism and having some of the strictest racial laws in their own artificial homeland (their ownership of which is based on a covenant they broke when Christ was murdered; not including the many Jews who converted to Talmudism of the Pharisees and Kabbalistic Black Magic since then), then they are happy to equate their Holyhoax with the murder of a single individual or the strange arm greeting of a TV gameshow host!

Killing time until Blockbusters was on

But don't ever say to the self-chosen few who run the Holocaust Industry (who will even call Jews who question what they do "anti-Semitic") that the wanton murder of a single Palestinian by racist Jews, or the bizarre behaviour of anyone (let along a TV show host) could be equated to the HolyHoax, for then you too will be an "anti-Semite."

It's all so very two legs good, four legs bad... Two legs good, four legs bad... Four legs good, two legs bad...

Isn't it?

Who Remembers the Other Millions Who Died?

Who Remembers the Millions KIlled by Talmudic Reds?

Remembrance Day has been and gone. Do the Socialists remember those dead who died in the Korean War fighting Communism? Do we think that WW1 was fought "for freedom"? Or that Iraq and Afghanistan were worth the losses, all for a Neo-Con fantasy?

Next up is Holocaust Day in January. We were sold this political event on the grounds it would remember all genocides. Really?

• Who remembers the Ukrainian Christians and Nationalists forcibly starved by the Communists circa 1933?
• Who remembers the Irish forcibly starved by the British State circa 1845?
• Who remembers the Bengalis forcibly starved by the British State circa 1943?
• Then there's the Armenians (the first Christian nation), robbed of their statehood and massacred by Turks.
• Then there's the Palestinians, robbed of statehood, exiled, put in camps etc.

All told these peoples vastly outnumber the "6 Million Jews" - the same figure Zionists said were being massacred, we should always remember, at the time in news reports during WW1.

Let's not forget the hundreds of thousands of Germans who died in criminal Allied Firestorms, nor the PoWs deliberately starved in 1945-46.

But hey, don't worry you Ukrainians, Irish, Bengalis, Armenians, Germans and Palestinians - we can all have yet another pantomime based on the Holohoax as the collection tin for B'nai B'rith is passed around. It seems your innocent dead don't count because they are gentile... How many Hollywood films about your dead are there? How many history lessons in schools? How many museum exhibits? How many govt organised memorial days? And how many laws making discussing the facts of their deaths an actual crime?

Ukrainians, Irish, Bengalis, Armenians, Germans and Palestinians: second class one and all!



P.S. If you are in any doubt as to the disdain you are held, think of the Poles who died at Auschwitz. Not only did they lose their freedom in 1945 to one of the countries that invaded them in September 1939 (which brings into doubt the whole ethos of WW2), but when Carmelite nuns erected Crosses at the site of their death, militant Zionist Jews poured vessels of urine over them. The latter demanded that the Crosses be taken down. Not even the dead of Auschwitz count... if they are not "chosen."


Links:
Bengal 1943/44 - The Forgotten Holocaust Killed Millions
Ukraine 1933 - Atheist Reds Organise Mass Starvation
Ireland 1845 - Free Trade Dogma of UK Means Millions Die

More Than Taboo: Emotional Blackmail Used to Justify Dubious Wars

Those promoting the pro-Israel, quasi-Neo Con line or "it's all the Muslims" lines in Nationalism must be ostracised.

One doesn't haven't to appreciate all this bloke's lines to see there is something wrong. In fact it is a shame he overlooks the fact that even religiously, given the Incarnation of Jesus Christ (after all, we are supposed to be a Christian country), the "right" of Jews to Palestine is negated: The New Covenant is between Christ and His Church, not the Jews who rejected Christ; and especially not those who converted to Judaism hundreds of years after Christ died.

Food for thought...

BTW - why aren't we, in the school system, ever told of the numbers of millions of Christian Russians, Ukrainians, Balts etc, who were killed in the gulags or via forced starvation by the Communists? is it because they were European Christians? Is it because Communists are still involved in politics and education? Is it because the Communist regime was run by a certain Jewish faction (as detailed by Churchill- hardly a "nazi")?

There does seem an inverse racism at play.

Millions were killed in Rwanda in a terrible tribal conflict, yet we still "worry" about one group in a conflict 60 years ago in which so many peoples suffered (not least the Germans and Russians). What do you think Africans make of that?

Collateral Murder - Coming Soon to Libya

Panorama, Newsnight and the entire BBC machinery has been acting as the mouth of the Libyan rebels. Every (uncensored) report from Tripoli almost invariably has the words "cannot be independently verified" tagged on, whereas reports from rebel areas (even tenuous, speculative ones, have no such tag line).

On last night's Newsnight a spokesman for the Libyan rebels all but called for US/NATO military action, on their side of course, and if civilians died - so be it, if it helped them win their civil war, their armed insurrection.

Thus we see the "humanitarian" cloak used (as Farrakhan said) to disguise their nefarious aims, is quickly tossed aside when it comes to killing civilians loyal to the Libyan government or in their areas!

Of course the elephant in the room is that armed rebels in civilian clothing are "civilians" too - even though they are in armed insurrection, no doubt helped by the CIA/Mossad.

So, as very few British MPs and media voices have the courage to state, we are joining a Civil War on one side. The crimes of that side will be airbrushed and the crimes of the other side (if you'll pardon the pun) will be blown out of all proportion.

'Mission Creep' is already taking place. There's talk of arresting Gaddafi, "taking out" Gaddafi, assaulting towns held by the Libyan government and their supporters (with how many civilian victims?) to help the rebels...

Killing innocents comes easy to the Zionists, and always will to achieve their ends. They are just numbers.

Human lives, civilian deaths, collateral damage -- however you want to label murder of innocents -- only matter when the Zionists want in somewhere. Then civilians murders are a crime against humanity. Oh the tears flow!

Yet when hundreds of thousands die in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza - not to mention the million or so dead in Rwanda - it matters not a jot to the Zionists. Indeed, in some (most!) cases they are the ones doing the indiscriminate murder.

When Israel invaded Lebanon (a sovereign nation) many innocents died and UN checkpoints were attacked. There was no UN Resolution, no no-fly zone, no talk of war crimes.

When Gaza had democracy and voted in Hamas (as was their right), Israel enacted an illegal blockade. Where then was the humanitarian concern of the Americans?

Watch the following video. It shows the Americans in action, committing a war crime. Killing civilians. The man who leaked this video is being abused in an American military stockade.

Where is America's love of freedom, that they wanted this video hushed up?

What happened in Iraq could well happen in Libya if the various War Hawks, Neo Cons and Zionists have their way (including the British government's Defence Secretary). It's what the 'rebels' (who are leading the BBC by the nose, so must be part of a MI6 agenda) want, in order to get their way, and change the government of Libya by hook or by crook.

The talk of humanitarian aims, helping civilians etc. is all hogwash.

Watch the video from Iraq. A man walking down the street with a weapon (lets call him a "rebel") walks into a building. The American gunship then gets the all-clear from their own Command to attack the building, to blow it up (with everyone inside it).

If the rebel were a Libyan rebel and the helicopter were a Libyan government one, this would be shown on Newsnight as proof of war crimes, and as an excuse to get NATO troops on the ground to protect civilians (even the ones carrying weapons).

Why therefore, is it not a criminal act when the Americans do it? Because they are following Zionist war aims? Because they can veto the UN Security Council?

Is this any way to get neutral unbiased justice in the world? Or a neutral unbiased military response backed by the UN?

If NATO/US forces get even more embroiled in Libya, we will see more of this kind of action, more civilian deaths, the Civil War will escalate.

All to a back-drop of billions spent on weaponry at a time when all the Western states are close to bust and poverty in America, for example, is rampant! Kerching.

Yet because that seems to be a Zionist goal, we are all meant to sit back and clap politely when a Libyan rebel leader calls for more "collateral damage" to achieve his aims. Doesn't it kind of remind you of the Iraqi rebel nutters who were calling for war and promising they'd find the sites of the WMDs? Beware war propaganda using useful idiots.

Welcome to the New World Order. Killing is their business, and business is good.

Gaddafi is Mad - at the Criminals Bombing His Country

22nd March, 2011

Editor, Today, BBC Radio 4, London

Dear Sir

GADDAFI IS NOT MAD OR A DICTATOR

Gaddafi may be mad at what is happening to his beloved country but he is not mad psychologically. He wrote the Third Universal Theory of politics which outlines the flaws in representative democracy – under-representation (only a quarter to a third of people are usually represented by the Party taking power), manipulation of policy by donors and powerful elites etc. and supervision of the law-makers by themselves. We could add; indulging in wars that are not in any manifesto, palpably illegal and likely to incite retribution rather than ‘destroy’ terrorists.

Generally known as his Green Book, it suggests a solution is for everyone to represent themselves. He set up People’s Congresses, National, Regional and Local, so that individuals could voice their concerns and proposals for policy. I have seen them in operation, it is a breath of fresh air. It is also a delicate experiment, especially in a nation of diverse tribal interests. But it kept the peace for 40-odd years. It also kept people’s minds active where our democracy numbs them by distancing people from government. So they are alert to foreign manipulation where we are blissfully ignorant of it.
So Gaddafi was not mad or a dictator when he gave everyone the right to participate in policy. Would we had it here!

He was not mad when he demanded fair price for Libyan oil in 1969.

He was not mad when he rightly criticized the UN last year for being run by a Security Council which did not represent the developing world.

He was not mad when he criticized the US for manipulating the Security Council by vetoing any motions it did not like, especially those condemning Israeli atrocities against Palestinians.

He was not mad when he pointed out that 80% of global wealth was in the hands of about 400 families.

He was not mad when he criticized Israel for bombing innocent civilians in Gaza without being sanctioned by the Security Council.

And he was not mad or a dictator when he asked the rioters, “Do you want to be occupied by America?” and advised them to seek out traitors and defend themselves.

In all these cases he was mad enough to expose the really mad megalomaniacs who control most of the world using violence, fraud and deception. Indeed, his exposure of them is likely to account for the second disproportionate and inhuman bombardment of his country.

Incidentally, the first bombing raid in 1986, we now know, was predicated on false information about so-called terrorist plots by Libya. These were actually invented by Mossad. Psychological Warfare Department (LAP) of Mossad was behind the defamation of Ghaddafi. Victor Ostrovsky, ex-Mossad officer, details how Mossad tricked the ‘west’ (US, UK et al.) into bombing Libya in 1986 using 'Operation Trojan', in his ‘The Other Side of Deception' (p113-7). Trojan was a re-broadcasting device planted in Tripoli to put out false messages as if Col. Ghaddafi was planning terrorist attacks. An IDF ship offshore, beamed the coded messages into his HQ from which they were re-broadcast, giving the impression they were coming from Tripoli. So when the US and UK surveillance teams picked them up they believed they were genuine Libyan plots. Mossad was able to 'confirm' the reports! The bombing raid got Thatcher and Regan to commit war crimes by killing innocent people including Ghaddafi’s adopted daughter.

I would be grateful if you could salvage the BBC’s credibility for broadcasting the truth rather than parroting the disinformation by enemies of the people, by at least airing this side of the story, preferably mounting a discussion of it. Otherwise, our brave pilots and possibly the Prime Minister himself may be drifting into a bloody conflict in which they could be found guilty of War Crime. For, despite UN Resolutions 1970 & 1973, this war is not under UN control which the Charter stipulates, nor has the UN called on the parties to settle their dispute first (Chapter VI Art.33), required before action under Chapter VII when there is no threat to international peace and there is no authority to depose or murder the Head of State. So this is an unlawful interference in the domestic jurisdiction of a sovereign state, prohibited under Chapter I (Art.2(7)). Thus, sending in cruise missiles with their notorious inaccuracy and inevitable death to anyone near them, could be a War Crime.

So it is not Gaddafi who is mad, but our Leader and his entourage, falling for an irrational plot to unseat a falsely demonised ‘dictator’ whose only crime is to threaten and punish those who de-stabilize the country for no discernible benefit except possibly, to themselves. The dissidents over here have a different agenda: they can stay as long as they claim to be persecuted if they go home, so they have to propagate stories about torture and death.

Finally, Gaddafi is not the ‘dictator’ Mossad would like you to believe. He is not even the ‘President’ having retired as ‘Leader’ in 1996 and adopted the title ‘Father of the Revolution’. But he is so popular and revered by most of the population, that he is still given the authority to speak for his nation, just as the Queen might do if she was allowed to.

Is there any chance you might try to balance the demonization with some facts about his brave attempts to give power to the people and hold a disparate nation together? I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely

Dr James B Thring (founder Ministry of Peace & Legal Action Against War)

With thanks to NW Nationalists

American Zionist Hypocrites: the Dissatisfied Will Rise in the USA too

Now the usual suspects will screech about this video appearing on this site.

MAKE YOUR OWN MIND UP.

Listen to his words.

If only we had a White, Christian leader like this, instead of weasels and hypocrites too afraid to upset the Israeli Lobby and their compliant media.

We may not agree with everything Farrakhan stands for (though we should learn to respect Black Separatists -- I would always prefer them to integrationist coconuts who want to join the BNP and be "proud Brits"), but he speaks a lot of sense.

When Americans rebel against their government, will the slugs in Washington DC back down, declare a cease fire and give the rebels their own land, where they can keep their arms and run their own affairs? Or will they do another Waco, Ruby Ridge etc.?

Farrakhan is right to point out America's hypocrisy over Gaza and Lebanon.

Sadly at the time those conflicts were happening, leading BNPers were supporting Israel!

Shame on them.

I would rather listen to Farrakhan than the Kosher words of a White traitor selling out for Zionist shekels any day of the week.

I believe most White Separatists, Nationalists and Patriots would too. We have our differences, sure. But his racial separatism and his anti-Zionism means he talks a lot of sense. It's a shame he's a Muslim... but you can't have everything handed to you on a plate!

Just as with David Duke, the man himself may have his shortfalls, we may even disagree on certain things, but when a message is powerful and correct, we have a duty to listen and tell others.

They Only Had Paint Ball Guns? Pull the Other One Levi!

Do you remember the BBC's Panorama special on the Israeli assault on the peace flotilla?

On that programme the Israelis were given the freedom (unquestioned!) to spread outright lies.

One of these was that the Israeli commandos who swamped the ship were armed only with paint ball guns.

Yes. Paint ball guns.

Stop laughing.

They murdered civilians with lethal force. The "Allies" did nothing. The same Allies who now lecture us on the sanctity of human life (post Iraq and the tens of thousands who died there!).

More hypocrisy from 'the West.'

Israeli Air Strikes: What Response From the Hypocrite Cameron?

Israelis have bombed a cement factory.

Rebels in Gaza want democracy - they want the freedom to vote for and support Hamas, not some Israeli puppet.

Apparently the UK, France and the USA are to hit back at Israel with Tomahawk and Cruise Missiles as a new No Fly Zone is being implemented... News in that the Israeli PM's home has been struck by an 'Allied' Missile.

Not really.

That's because our politicians are hypocrites in the pockets of the Zionists.

Link:
Israel launch air strikes

Libya: More Hypocrisy from Cameron (and Rifkind)

On last night's news Cameron our non-chosen PM was said to be calling for military intervention in Libya, no-fly zone as a starter. Others including the Tory Zionist Malcolm Rifkind have called for the Libyan rebels to be armed - in short, that we should be seen to enter a civil war, uprising, call it what you will on one side.

Right: Malcolm Rifkind wants us to arm the rebels. No, not Irish rebels. No, not Palestinian rebels. No, not Bahraini or Saudi rebels. Just the Libyan ones.

Isn't that what the British media point the finger at re. Gaddafy arming the IRA? Whilst we were giving explosives, arms etc. to Muslim groups in Libya (and Afghanistan and probably quite a few others) to murder politicians, soldiers and civilians alike, Gaddafy was sending arms to Ireland.

When is backing terrorism not backing terrorism? When the British State does it?

So now we have high-ranking Tories acting like Neo Con war hawks (just as they would have aped Blair's actions had they been in power when George Dubya Bush was - no matter how much they tried to feign otherwise after the fact).

Funnily enough they are not calling for the Bahraini rebels to be armed, even as the Saudi dictators send in armed forces.

If Gadaffy had called in the organised, armed forces of a neighbour (a corrupt dictatorship at that) can you imagine Cameron's response? He'd pop a fuse.

Yet because the corrupt Saudis and the corrupt Bahraini's are "on our side" a blind eye is turned.

When circa 1 million Rwandans were wiped out (not to mention the rapes and mutilations) just a few years ago, Britain did nothing. And they accuse us of being racists? Bahrain sends in Saudi armed forces to attack civilians. Britain does nothing. Let's not even mention Robert Mugabe.

Not only are the British State hypocrites for arming terrorists when it suits their aims (and crying when others do it against them), but they are hypocrites now for clamouring for action against Libya; because when Israel drops white phosphorous on civilians or when the Saudis sent the military into a neighbour to crush civilian protests, the British State does not seek no fly zones or to arm the insurrectionists there.

Once upon a time people talked of joined-up-government and didn't Robin Cook try to implement an ethical foreign policy (probably for a couple of hours until Blair steam-rollered it)?

If the British State gets involved in Libya, no matter the degree, the Palestinians and the Bahrainis will ask "why not us?" with good reason. Not to mention the haunted souls of the dead Rwandans calling "is it cos we is black?"

Blair killed joined-up-government and executed the idea of an ethical foreign policy. Is Mr. Cameron now about to lay them in a lead-lined coffin at the bottom of the Marianas Trench?

Mubarak and Egypt: What the Spooks Will be Thinking

Mubarak has resigned and the Egyptian Army, bankrolled by the USA, is in charge.

Will Egypt become a "democracy" or will other events come to pass?

The biggest question of all: will Egypt put the desires and needs of Egyptians first - or will it continue to kowtow to America and Israel?

That is what certain people in Tel Aviv, New York and Westminster will be most interested in.

When the Palestinians voted in Hamas, the likes of Israel and her allies took action. They started a civil war and blockaded the Palestinian areas.

You see, dear reader, it's not about democracy (like wot they told us in Iraq and Afghany) because if it was they wouldn't have backed Mubarak for 30 years.

It's about who supports Israel and what is in the Zionists' best interests. Always has been, always will be.

There will be a lot of jittery people in the Unholy Triumvirate of Tel Aviv, New York and Westminster, just as there will be a lot of spooks on the streets and behind the scenes in Egypt.

Their prime concern: Egyptian policy towards Israel. Simple as guvnor.

War Propaganda Dehumanises Germans and Arabs

How war propaganda works.

How Germans were dehumanised - years later.

How German civilian victims were airbrushed out.

Right: How children were taught all Germans were evil.

The question is, why are we still suffering WW2 war propaganda and spin all these years later? The sole beneficiary seems to be Israel (i.e. that they can mistreat the Palestinians because of all the alleged actions of the "evil Nazis").

Fisk hints at the end of this article at the dehumanising of the enemies of current Zionist conflicts.

Indeed.

We've all seen how thousands of dead Arab men, women and children are stats, excused away by Israeli spin doctors as a legitimate result of war, whereas a handful of dead Israelis get copious media coverage and media columns on state-sponsored terrorism.

Left: 50 years on and the machinery is more sophisticated, but the war propaganda is still being churned out.

I see no difference between Commando-style comics portraying all Germans as murderers, war criminals and bayonet fodder for (American and Soviet led) democracy and the garbage that gets pumped out of Hollywood portraying all Arabs as murderers, mad Mullahs, terrorists and bullet fodder for (American and Israeli led) democracy.

Yet again we witness how the powers-that-be treat us all like sheep, to be led and cajoled into pens, where we are spoon fed propaganda and spin.

The Power of Nightmares.


Link:
Robert Fisk

Ich bin ein Palestinian

The Berlin Wall was 154km long.
The West Bank Wall is 700km long.

Where is the outcry?

The Berlin Wall was up to 3.6m high.
The West Bank Wall is up to 8m high

Where is the outcry?

The American President decried the Berlin Wall.

The Americans airlifted aid to those cut off by the Berlin Wall.

Where is the outcry over those cut off by the West Bank Wall? Where is the American airlift?

And let's not forget those cut off by the illegal Gaza Strip blockade by Israel.

JFK declared that we were all Berliners in the face of Communist tyranny that sought to block off human beings against international law.

Why doesn't Obama declare that we are all Palestinians in the face of Zionist tyranny that seeks to block off human beings against international law?

Why does Israel get carte blanche to break so many international laws on invasions, acts of war, illegal nukes, mass imprisonment, mass expulsions, land-grabs and so much more?

To ask the question is to answer it.


Link:
Publicise the Illegal West Bank Wall

Show Everyone Where You Stand!

In the light of Zionist aggression against charitable souls and peaceful deliverers of aid to the besieged Palestinians, it is vital that all true nationalists show whose side we are on!

No other State would dare to act as the bandit state of Israel does, illegally cutting off millions of people, denying them food, medicine, building materials and even water (read the leaflet on this in the range we have).

It then goes on to send airbourne armed commandos swooping in against peace activists when any other country would (if it dared to blockade anywhere!) send the police, coast guard or standard navy patrol.

In the face of such naked aggression against peace-makers and aid-givers from around the world, it is vital that nationalists side with the cause of justice; lest plastic patriots and bought-and-paid-for Tories (on some 'Islam is guilty of everything') attempt to portray Zionism as the afflicted party.

When Israel strikes out like this against those they perceive as "cattle," then: we are all Palestinians!


Links:
Anti-Israel badge
Bumper Palestinian Solidarity Set
Intifada Worldwide badge
Intifada Worldwide stickers
Palestinian Flag
Palestinian Leaflets

Eyewitness to Israeli Terror Attack

Unlike the USS Liberty terror attack, this cannot be hushed by the Zionist Lobby.

Irish Ship Heads to Palestine

Palestine: It's Not Hate Stoopid

gaza's Christians Struggle to Celebrate Christmas

Link:
Gaza's Christians

Who Posts on Wikipedia

About 200 Israelis are active Wikipedians -- people who contribute and edit entries related to Israel several times a week. Israel has the world's highest per capita amount of Wikipedia users.

Link:
Jewish Telegraph on Wikipedia

Miliband Ignores UN Report on Israeli War Crimes

The UN, in an impartial independent review, has said that Israel is guilty of war crimes.

One of the Miliband brothers (David, the Foreign Secretary) was on the box the other night and when asked what the UK intended to do about the war criminals, he had a reply that would have had Sir Humphrey blushing with shame.

Miliband said we needed to have an independent report into the allegations.

Bingo!

A "report into the report."

And when that comes out -- can we have a report into the report about the report? And so on ad nauseum?

Mr. Miliband may think it's OK to kill time as more Palestinians die (the Gaza is still cut off by Israeli troops) and no doubt his Jewish Communist mega-rich parents would admire his chutzpah.

After all we can all remember when UN reports on Iraq were ignored... erm...

Miliband (version 1 and/or 2) may think it acceptable to filibuster as men, women and children die, or whilst war criminals slip away (whatever happened to "Never Again"?) but as he is elected to his post, we should --all of us who believe in natural justice-- ensure that our government responds with justified anger to the role of war criminals in a highly disproportionate attack on a tiny strip of land filled with civilians, let alone the blockade of Gaza that has been going on for years.