Milibands Show That Politics Remains a Con

There's a few stories floating around today about the Miliband brothers.

One is that David, who wanted to be Labour Party leader but failed, is now working for a City firm, making big money.

Brothers in arms?

The other is that Ed, who won the Labour Party leadership, is pictured getting into a flash sports care carrying a "green" shopping bag.

This all shows a number of things:

• The political 'leaders' all come from the same mould. 
• They think they are doing us "a favour" by not taking mega-bucks jobs and 'slumming it' in Westminster for a few hundred grand a year.
• Their friends and associates belong to the mega-bucks world, so they have no knowledge of normal life, of struggling to pay bills, of living in low-cost housing in the multi-culti hell they have created.
• That they can walk out of politics to plush jobs and placements. The more bankers etc. they help while in power, the more rewards they stand to get afterwards.
• These people - as politicos or financiers - jet around the world, yet lecture us on turning off light bulbs to 'save the planet.'
• They will carry "green" shopping bags whilst using "gas guzzling" super cars.

That is the world of the political elite. Just as when they start their foreign wars, sending in troops to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria (resulting in countless tens of thousands of innocent deaths), they sit safely back in Westminster plotting their non-executive placements. They talk of 'feeling the pain' of ordinary people, yet give knighthoods to usurers that cause debt.

It is all a con.

Of course the Milibands are the offspring of extremist Jewish Marxists, but they have embraced Capitalist greed, Zionist wars and the same old cycle of betrayal and reward.

It is a world of hypocrisy and hyperbole, of do as I say, not as I do, of practicing never ending war whilst preaching 'climate change' and one world humanism. And the Milibands fit in just fine and dandy.

Global Warming Happened in Roman and Medieval Times

Can "global warming" and its effects account for the Fall of the Roman Empire?

So say the 'experts' after looking at tree rings.

Right: Just one example of how Tree Rings can show local weather patterns in history.

See the BBC story here.

This means that:

• If Global Warming is true (as a man made event), we could see the fall of the USA's Zionist Empire.
• Or will the collapse of global Capitalism be put down to changing climate as opposed to usury and unpayable debt?
• Global warming and cooling has been happening in Roman and Medieval times (and of course in the last ice age) long before 4x4s or the advent of the internal combustion engine.

So we have to ask what causes Global Warming if it has been happening throughout history? Is a natural occurring phenomenon and if so why are taxes, restrictions and globalist policies being promoted?

Answers on a postcard to George Monbiot and all the Guardianistas whose individual "carbon footprints" are a damn sight higher than poor working sods like me who they like to lecture!

EU President Blair? To Fight Global Warming?

Some people say that global warming is a con.

"But why is it a con? Cui Bono?" ask the incredulous and easily pliable.

Well of course there's the usual "scientific community" looking out for their next sinecure or their next celebrated paper published to the acclaim of all.

But there's a more insidious side to this (besides getting more "Green Taxes" out of us as a side-serving to all the other forms of taxation used to pour into the bottomless pit that is the national debt).

Chris Bryant is an MP for the Rhondda in South Wales. You know the sort of area - old school Labour, solidly working class and pretty much traditional.

Chris Bryant is also a typical New Labour minister. Gay (of course!), suppliant to the Mandelsonian vision of New Labour, about as Rhondda Valley as a preening ballerina in a tutu who eschews drinking bitter for a more wine-bar style aperitif.

Right: Chris Bryant MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Foreign & Commonwealth Office was an Anglican vicar, until he posted this photo of himself in his pants on a homosexual website. Just the sort of moral compass needed for the House of Commons and a place in HM Government!

When asked to defend the idea of Tony Blair (war criminal and multi-millionaire) becoming the unelected President of the European Union he (Bryant) said that a powerful and respected man like Blair was needed to speak up for Europe so we could combat climate change.

Kerching!

So what are you telling us Mr. Bryant?

We need an unelected President of a non-existent country to... battle climate change?

Oh! I've seen the light!

Here you go Masonic bureaucrats of the EU Commission. Take all my freedoms and enroll me in your super-state! Just so long as you "fight climate change" eh?

What I find deplorable is the idea that we need a Super President of a Super State to fight pollution of any sort. I'm not a fan of pollution per se, and regardless of their pet theories and hidden taxes, I think any pollution that can be stopped should be.

But why the hell should we surrender ancient rights and sign up to spurious politically 'human rights' legislation that give some EU-approved pervert from the Bi-Lesbian Gay and Transgender (BLT) coalition the "right" to go into our schools and youth clubs, to harangue and brainwash our children?

Just as a huge paedophile racket has been smashed in Scotland wherein the boss of a similar BLT (Bi-Lesbian Fag and Transformer) 'Youf Support' network was involved in the rape of children as young as 18 months (two of the ringleaders were sentenced to Life -- and that's just seven and a half years or 90 months before parole); we are told that these perverts have the "right" to lecture our children on the rights of homosexuals and how homosexuality is perfectly normal.

That is the EU agenda, that is the Blairite agenda.

Big Brother, Big State, Big President: all to confer rights upon criminals, perverts, degenerates... whilst the ancient rights to freedom, habeus corpus, innocent until proven guilty etc. go out the Soviet-shaped EU window.

The very idea that a man who started an illegal war that killed hundreds of thousands could even be considered as President (could even be considered to be walking around free!) shows how ridiculous the whole EU set-up is!

Blair is free to profit big time, to be a "peace envoy" to the Middle East (ha ha ha), free to promote himself to EU leaders... whilst those who merely debate one aspect (and only one aspect, note!) of history are routinely locked up for their Thought Crimes!

Still, if Mr. Chris Bryant says we need an EU President to "combat climate change" and if he says Mr. Blair is the very man for the job, then who are we to gainsay a much-respected elected member of the House of Commons and Minister of Her Majesty's Government?

After all, that's democracy!

Left: "It's Global Warming stoopid!" cries the system stooge as he bashes us over the head with the controlled mass media mallet. When we get bored of that, "it's the Al Qaeda Terrorists stoopid" cries the voice of Big Brother.

And if we do raise a protest that can always hit us on the head (Timmy Mallett stylee) that we are risking the total ruination of the planet via global warming.

George Orwell had Eurasia and Eastasia to worry Winston Smith and everyone else in Oceania, we poor proles have the big invisible enemies of Global Warming and Al Qaeda - mere ghost creations of a global elite of course, but these are the big enemies used to push forward their global agenda.

Relativity, Global Warming & Other Sacred Cows

Another great piece from the Nationalist Truth Blog.

Nationalists must start to look beyond the accepted media norms, whether it's Global Warming, 911, the Holohoax, the US Civil War or the Spanish Inquisition.


Link: Hoaxes, Einstein, David Bellamy & Political Correctness

We're Still Being Neo-Conned

Hold the front page!

George Dubya says that Iraq was the right thing to do and that his illegal invasion has stopped Iraq being used by "Al Qaeda."

Now, now. Stop laughing.

This kind of thing once held sway in the backwoods of America. Everything was the fault of Osama and his chums and we were all "fighting terror."

With Gordon Brown's "National Security Strategy" uncovered today, we are still being fed the "nightmare fears" of terror (oh, and global warming too).

Of course the fact the MI5 was having a huge cash and personnel injection is exactly what the Spooks want.

As with so much of the "War on Terror" etc. it all boils down to money and power. Certain people want more money for their agencies. Others want more money paid to their multinationals (wars = big profits). Some wanted oil revenues and profits.

As usual, money is the root of all evil, a pattern often repeated in our oh so modern world.

Just today some profiteers in the City of London put out false rumours about some banks facing finance problems (i.e. shortages of funds a la Northern (C)Rock) in order to see the shares in the banks plummet, so they could buy them up at bargain prices and make a nice profit.

These people don't care about jobs and families, they care only about money and bumper bonuses. Likewise those who profiteered via Iraq couldn't give a fig for the up to 800,000 dead Iraqis... as long as the government contracts roll their way.

Yet there is another angle on this, and it's an angle that is ignored (purposefully and otherwise) by pacifists, socialists and others because it is too gigantic and embarrassing.

It is the proverbial 'Elephant in the Room' painted luminous yellow, or to put it another way, the Emperor is not only butt naked, but he's cartwheeling on the village green, much to the disdain of the local cricket team.

Last night on the BBC's Newsnight an ex-MP let the genie out of the bottle. Asked why he eventually voted in favour of the invasion (despite the loud protests even of his own daughter) he said he was told (by whom???) that if the UK didn't occupy Basra, Israel would!

His half-hearted defence of his actions ran that he would rather Britain be involved (to control events and add some professionalism etc.) than Israel with all that would entail.

So there we have it:

1. Our troops died in place of Israelis.
2. That illegal war in which MPs were pressurised and shown false "proof" was carried out on behalf of Israel (as we always said it was).

It was always clear that Iraq was a Zionist affair (as I said, despite the silence from pacifists and reds) after the first war/invasion.

Look at how it transmogrified into something harmless:
Operation Israel Shield
became
Operation Desert Shield
became
Operation Desert Storm.

That is fact. That is undeniable fact.

Now, the Newsnight report on the way MPs were pushed to vote for British involvement in an illegal war to keep Israel out of it (at least overtly, we all know their black ops teams have assassinated their way across Iraq) adds yet another facet to this illegal Zionist war.

So there we have it, brave soul.

There is no doubt (was there ever any?) that this war, which Dubya still tries to (neo) con us into accepting via nonsense about 911 and "Al Qaeda," was all about Zionism, Israeli position - with money, power and oil as facilitating factors.

Link:
Neo-Conned: essential reading for nationalists

Nuclear is Green and George Dubya Wants Peace (Ha Ha Ha)

So, as FC and others predicted so long ago, this corrupt, crony-filled, money-grubbing government, on the back of so much "global warming" B.S., is pushing through the building of more nuclear powers stations.

Above Left: Blinky says that nuclear power is perfectly environmental, safe and green! Sleep safe and sound children - our politicians know what's best.

Let's see... So now that which threatens our gene pool, which could pollute the land for thousands of years, is now "green" eh?

That's how cock-eyed this whole "global warming" con is.

A bunch of fat-cats will make billions out of these power stations (built nowhere near Islington) and we will be mopping up the aftermath for hundreds of years.

I have never supported nuclear power, and even back in the ("Bulldog") NF of the 1980s a friend who was pro-NF was also a CND member, and I often chatted to him about it. I saw no great challenge in him being in CND and becoming a NF member.

Right: Any nuclear leaks from the planned power stations will infest our land for generations. On visiting the beach at Dounereay in Northern Scotland I saw with my own eyes the signs warning about "hotspots" from minute leaked nuclear particles. The beach at that beautiful spot will probably be hazardous for hundreds of years. How green!

Of course, at the time the NF was promoting alternative power as a clean way of producing power.

Meanwhile, back in 2008, we find out that the old light bulbs are being "phased out" to be replaced by what's akin to strip lighting, with all the medical side effects.

As someone who worked in a warehouse with nothing but strip lighting, I know that this has side-effects. Very often, coming out of that environment into daylight was like emerging from a heavily chlorinated swimming pool in that your eyes stung and you felt tired and even a little woozy.

Left: A nuclear disaster would be oh-so-green.

So God bless Gordon Brown and his acolytes.

Keep on conning us all, keep on fighting Zionist wars, keep on propping up a failing banking system... no doubt a lovely sinecure awaits, just like Tony Blair at JP Morgan Chase or Norman Lamont at Rothschilds (etc. ad nauseum).

The more you look at the bigger picture (27% fuel price hikes after shareholders get 60% dividends) the more you realise that we are, in all reality, treated as cattle.

Capitalism is a con trick.

Ever since our people were forced off the land, the land was enclosed, our forefathers were put in factories, down pits etc. etc. we have been treated as cattle.

Right: Blair trousers £0.5 Million a year from the Wall Street brigade as the nightmare in Iraq lingers on. Meanwhile his pal Bush joins him in the Middle East to plan for "Peace." Yes, the Zionist warmongers have (another) "peace plan" - don't all cheer at once!

As I've said before, it's the difference in seeing your compatriots as made in the image of God or as cogs in a machine to be used and replaced.

It was that Capitalist mentality that gave the green light to mass immigration (cheap wages "helps the economy" dontcha know!) and doesn't care about scandals such as homosexuality ("they have more money" dontcha know!) or abortion ("makes money and its freedom-of-choice" dontcha know!).

Still, why be so cynical.

After all, George "Yo Blair" Dubya is in Occupied Palestine planning peace with his Zionist hosts.

All's well with the world (stop crying/laughing).

Left: Cartoon showing Blair's financial corruption as Labour Party boss.

Link:
Blair Trousers £500,000 p.a. for Treachery
More than 30 pieces of silver, but the principle is the same.

Nuclear Power Stations Get the Go-Ahead
Iranians are asking the UN to level sanctions against a proven war monger.

We're NOT Free!

It doesn't take much to start a panic.

Remember the petrol strikes (of 2001 if my ever-failing memory is right)? Or the floods of last year?

Left: Bankers and Capitalists view us as cattle to be milked for their profits; they have no loyalty to Faith, Family or Nation.

In the former the shelves of shops emptied of bread, milk and other 'essentials.'

In the latter people in some of the effected areas where water-supply was hit were even endangering themselves by drinking non-purified water.

We like to think in the 21st Century were are immune from disasters and oh so much more advanced than our ancestors who were philistines and neanderthals by comparison.

The truth, I'm sure, is not like that at all.

We have made huge advances, but pull the plug on the national grid - i.e. take away our fridges and computers, and just how "advanced" would we be?

Our people have been forced off the land centuries ago. We are no longer self-sufficient. Look at the privations when the U Boats cut off the trans-Atlantic imports!

Who amongst us has food stored for the winter (and I don't mean the glut that temporarily fills our fridge and larder over Christmas)? Who, if the water supply were cut-off would last more than a few days before becoming desperate?

We have become dependent on outside suppliers, and dependency equals slavery.

As Distributists we should make it clear that a self-sufficient population (with means of producing the basics - food and water at the very least) is a free population.

The BBC did a report on the foodstuffs shipped across the world (shrimps and fruit) the other day and how - in this age of "Global Warming" and "Carbon Footprints" - it was bad that so much time and effort should be spent thus.

Quite so!

All these greens and suchlike are merely nibbling at the edges of Distributism, albeit for possibly erroneous reasons, but they are also missing the bigger picture.

A family that produces its own food and drink makes no "Carbon Footprint" - but more so it is independent, it is free.

Communities that barter, that have sources of meat, fuel and more within their locality do not rely on motorways. Furthermore, communities that barter and who use locally issued money or "tax vouchers" are free of usury and the artificial peaks and troughs of the banksters and international cabal of usurers.

It's a daydream? Yes it is - but no more of a daydream than stopping immigration, stopping the mass-murder of abortion, stopping the endemic of street crime or stopping the unparalleled promotion of homosexuality and the state-sanctioned attacks on the family.

We don't have to live as families of centuries ago, we can still enjoy the advances of the modern age where beneficial and practical, so this is no "step backwards" as many Capitalists would have you believe... besides how can a family and community free, independent, self-sufficient, usury-free and not under threat of repossession, the dole, inflation, empty shop shelves etc possibly be regarded by any - except those who wish to control and profiteer from our families and communities - as "backwards."

If freedom is "backwards" then Capitalism, slavery and state-control is positively prehistoric.

Yes, we live in the 21st Century - we're not Luddites - but we need to be aware of what freedom is (it's not putting a cross on a piece of paper every four years - and it's sure as Hell not the sloganeering of oligarchic politicians, Socialist or Neo-Con, Liberal or "Right Wing"!) and how to achieve it.

Just today there are people sat in hotels around Heathrow because their 'Christmas flights' were fog-bound. Some people like to think that the modern world is all-powerful and omnipotent.

Perhaps the occasional wake-up call to remind us just how fragile this whole set-up is, is no bad thing.

Right: Love Freedom? Stick a Distributist supporting GK Chesterton 'bauble' on next year's Christmas tree!

When the next Wall Street Crash happens how many more lives will be ruined?

It is up to Nationalists to show our people how we can be free of Capitalist slavery and Socialist bureaucracy.


Link:
Buy the Chesterton ornament for next Christmas...

Viva Le Crusties

I support "the crusties" at Heathrow.

Now now - Harry in Glasgow, put that wok down!

Let me clarify my stance.

As you may know a coalition of dole-ite crusties and middle class Guardianistas with too much time and/or money have converged on Heathrow to set up a Camp to campaign against carbon emissions and the British Airport Authority (BAA) who want to expand Heathrow Airport already easily the largest in the UK.

Why do I support them?

Because I believe in the media-presented Global Warming conspiracy? Er... no.

Because I like their heady brand of liberalism, anarchism and socialism? Er... no.

Because I have ambitions to don an Afghan jacket, smoke pot and grow dreadlocks? Er... no.

Now Paul in Birmingham - put that snooker cue down this minute!

No, dear and faithful reader, I'm supporting this mobile circus of the weird and the (hmmm) wonderful because I think the idea of another runway at Heathrow is out of order.

The middle class and government ministers who nod sagely at Global Warming conspiracies are the first to jump on a plane to go skiing or zip off to the Bahamas.

The government promised no extension at Heathrow - and yet it's now going ahead.

The people I feel most sorry for are those who live and work near Heathrow. They have to put up with the noise, the traffic jams and much more.

I think BAA are just out to increase profits by building yet more shops and arcades around another runway and terminal, and no thought is given to the locals who suffer the noise and congestion.

If another runway is really needed, why not look at airports further afield? Let's spread the infrastructure around a bit...

In a recent debate on Stormfront one of my colleagues got into an argument with a typical nationalist... but who was taken in by the kind of propaganda the Guardianistas at Heathrow will espouse.

He said (after someone attacked homosexuals for not being normal and procreating) that there were "too many people in the world."

Nonsense of course. Our people and continent iare slowly aging and DYING!

The truth is that there are too many people crammed into the cities - especially the huge conurbations in and around the M25, in the Midlands and in the ex-industrial Lancs/Mancs area, plus in the Central Belt of Scotland.

Of course there are also millions of immigrants flooding in - and these tend to head to these large conurbations too.

And so we have people crammed inside the M25, with immigrants being poured into that area, and now they want another runway to add to the traffic chaos.

Anyone who's sat in the car park known as the M25 in the West London/Heathrow area anytime between 8am and 10am or 4pm and 6pm will know that the infrastructure there is almost at bursting point.

So I hope the crusties at Heathrow give BAA a bloody nose (BAA can afford it!) and if in the meantime it rains a little heavier on the Guardianistas and the "security forces" dealing with this "threat" then no harm done...

By the way, some ask what the Third Positionist answer is to the urban sprawl of London and similar places, so here's how I see it:

1. Let the many immigrants there sell their homes and keep the proceeds, to use in resettling them overseas. The country (free from usury-debt) can easily afford to let them do this - and if a glut on the market happens, local authorities or government can buy the houses. It will certainly help our children and grandchildren actually afford homes (coupled with non-usurious loans).

2. The large agri-business and absentee landlord estates (owned, for example by huge multi-national insurance companies and the like) can be bought up and/or seized (dependent on circumstances etc.). Then, bit by bit these can by split into small holdings with a house and a few acres for crops/orchards/livestock etc.

3. No new housing estates should be built. No more Lego homes sprawling across our land, in "green" or "brown field" sites.

4. People who want to live in the cities and towns can buy the homes left empty by the immigrants who are free to pocket the money.

5. A programme of demolishing hideous housing estates or breaking them up to include more parkland and allotments within them, plus building farmhouses and outbuildings for small holdings will inject money and work into the economy.

6. With more families back on the land, with their own land to raise food, animals etc. the nation will become far more self-sufficient (this can, of course, be supplemented in the modern world by the promotion of "work from home" initiatives - further cutting congestion, and greenhouse gases for Friends of the Earth commissars looking in).

7. This will also revitalise the market towns of the Shires, and reduce the need for juggernauts shifting chemical crap from one end of the country to the other. More local produce at local farm markets, shops etc. will please the greens.

With the cities cleaned up and more parkland and clean public transport made available, and the countryside brought to life by a network of small holdings accompanying existent working farms, will bring back the balance to the land: with people back in touch with the land, healthy food readily available, and far healthier families and children as a result.

I think with financial reward given to those who chose to raise larger families and incentives to farm the land, we will see a healthy growth in rural schools and rural communities, real communities not half of the houses empty holiday homes and not most of the land owned by agri-businesses and absentee landlords.

Some will call it a dream. It is. But it's no utopia... it will mean hard work for all involved, but the rewards personally, for the families, for the communities and for the nation will be huge.

We either aim to achieve our dream or we dread to live in their nightmare.

On the news today it says schoolkids in London are having uniform bought for them, by worried parents, which include the anti-knife material Kevlar.

Anyone who saw Panorama last night on the BBC (showing the knife and gun crime amongst Blacks in London) has no excuse anymore. There is no burying your head in the sand.

The nightmare is just around the corner as our people live in towns and cities where more of this crime, if not already present, is fast spreading...

Which future would you rather?