Poof "Weddings" - Democracy is an Arse

So we have democracy right?

None of the "main parties" had "weddings" for homosexuals in their manifestos.

Yet now they all, Tory, Lib, NuLab, SNP, PC and Green favour poof weddings (sic).

So we have no say, no choice and the usual crowd of Islingtonite Guardianistas push the agenda against what most people want AND against our traditions and the common good.

But wait! The Tories announced a discussion on it and asked for feedback didn't they?

Well, yes and no. They ignored the input of anyone opposed to their madness and said they would push ahead with overturning MILLENNIA of law, regardless of what people said!

Democracy?

People often say 'the Law is an ass.'

We might now say 'Democracy is an arse.'

What the people want, what our traditions dictate, what the common good demands and what common sense makes clear: all this is to be overturned on the altar of political correctness to give "rights" to morally corrupt, sexually deviant and mentally unhinged minority of a minority.

The world has gone mad.

Sign the Petition Against 'Homosexual Marriage'

Over 300,000 people have now signed the Coalition For Marriage's online petition to tell the government to stop playing petty party politics with an institution that's been around a lot longer than party politics.

All Nationalists, patriots and decent people should sign the online petition. It's easy to do and helps to make the political decision harder for the homo-lobby in government to push through!

• Go 'sign it' today.
• Spread the word.
• Tell us many friends and family members.
• Post links on forums, facebook, twitter, blogs and websites.

This is something we can ask all family members, workmates and friends to do as it isn't "fascist" or "racist."

The more that sign it the better. The more resistance we put up the better.

It really is the very least you can do.

Coalition For Marriage Online Petition

Tesco's Back Down on Poof-Fest - Keep Up the Pressure

Plenty to lose...

After a concerted campaign, Tesco's have backed down from an ongoing sponsorship deal with the London Walking Around with Our Arses Hanging Out, Leather Clad Degenerate Scumbags and Pierced Butch Dykes Rally (aka London "Pride").

This followed their decision to stop sponsoring events by a cancer charity, and the remarks of one of their head honchos that Christians opposed to "homosexual marriage" [sic] were extremists.

As the commentator Francis Phillips explains, they will still back sodomite groups, they will still back the poof rally this year and (to my knowledge) they have not sacked their R&D boss who made the comments against Christians.

So at the very least all decent people should continue boycotting Tesco's during 2012 - and if you get the chance tell them why.

Even more reasons to "send 'em back!"

They could have pulled the plug on the homo-fest this year (which breaks the law on public decency and blasphemy every year), but have chosen to stand by it.

So whilst this is a great victory, and shows what can be done with some well concerted pressure by the majority against a shrill but bank-rolled minority of degenerates, we must not be complacent.

Keep up the pressure and keep up the boycott, at least during 2012, and be ready with the next campaign. The next business that thinks it can promote sodomites and undermine our values must feel the wrath of the "men of goodwill" via pushing our message out on friendly blogs, websites and all the usual social media channels (not to mention sending emails to the companies in question).

It's a battle won. But the war goes on.

Mother and Father Deemed Irrelevant or Offensive?

There is a piece on Griffin Watch, which deals with a media story on the EU putting "Parent 1" and "Parent 2" on passports so's faggots can put their details with a clear conscience (!). I felt a rant coming on (apologies to Ranting Ron) so here's my response:

We Need an EU Law so Sad Gits Can "Marry" Foodstuffs*

This is the ultimate reality for the Masonic and Red enemy. In a world where there is no OBJECTIVE TRUTH, but wherein everything is subjective to our whims, where "democracy" extends to the family and 'sexuality' (i.e. where parents have no rights to control their children, and where men can "decide" they are 'really women'), why is this so surprising?

In an age when nationalists attack Muslims for being opposed to homosexuality (one of their very few redeeming features) itself a remnant of the fact they are a Christian Heresy, why are we surprised that the EU is now dictating that a mother and father begetting children is no longer the accepted norm?

An OBJECTIVE TRUTH: a child has one father and one mother is replaced by relativist nonsense, viz that a child can have two mothers, two fathers, and no doubt one mum and one section of the Berlin Wall - or whatever crazy notion infects the body politic in the near future.

The modern world is, quite literally crazy. At the centre of it are the immoral degenerates called homosexuals. They seem to [if you'll pardon the pun] have a vice-like grip on this and the previous government and seem intent on pushing their (very) queer agenda, at a time when real parents have very real worries, and it isn't about "mother and father" being on a passport!

The EU is Masonic, Socialist - dare I say Satanic?

They have an agenda which is to destroy the family and destroy every last vestige of Christian civilisation.

There can be little doubt in an age when they tax us to the hilt to give billions to bankers, and at a time when families have rights stripped away, and homosexuals get "rights" left, right and centre.

We've been dealt a bum hand!

---

*As long as it is a loving, caring relationship, of course.

The Response to the Riots: Time for Plain Speaking, not Platitudes

The likes of David Starkey and Peter Hitchens are, pretty much, hitting the nail on the head when it comes to the recent riots.

What's interesting is that the violence started with the death of a reputed gangsta. He had an illegal gun. His uncle was a drug and gun terrorist from Manchester (source) who was linked in with violent communist groups, involved in the supply of hard drugs in Manchester and the death of gangland opponents (i.e. drug supply rivals).

Right: The gangstas and ASBOs have free-rein, whilst the police crackdown on genuine protest. Meanwhile the law-abiding majority are made to feel like criminals as CCTV watches our every move and our ancient rights are curtailed. Question immigration or homosexuality and you might get that dawn knock on the door from the Stasi who fail to investigate most home robberies.

BBC Radio 4's morning news programme 'Today' showed that the Socialist Workers Party was in Tottenham stirring up the black rioters via a demo with a loud-hailer. So again we have a Communist link which most of the media, the police and the "experts" have ignored.

This coming together of the gangsta culture and the Communists seems to breed a sort of violence in which everything is up for grabs, with gangstas joined by whiggers, in turn joined by anyone who wants a free-for-all: the kind of ne'erdowells of all kinds who feel the world owes them a living (regularly seen on SWP demos moaning about the Tories whilst living a comfortable life).

The liberals that infest the BBC like the offspring of 1968 that they invariably are (like their counterparts in politics) decry anyone who points at anything like the truth. They have covered up the gangsta culture for years, the endemic crime on council estates where people live in fear, the iron grills that cover windows in London, even in posh areas, for fear of the "feral rats" who see anyone else's property as their own, by right.

This has nothing to do with Social Justice. If it were, people would be organised to that end, fighting for Distributism, seeking to be a part of society, holding up our traditional culture, beliefs and ideals as a beacon for all who want to take part and improve.

Of course this is where David Starkey is right. The gangsta culture is totally alien. It is un-European. It seeks to smash all things that stand in their way to rule the streets with fear and carve up cities for their drugs supply and obscene profits. This people grasp huge profits from drugs crime with both hands rather than work. They gun down anyone who dare stands up to them and will organise a riot if one of their drug overlords is taken out by the police.

Unlike those who seek genuine Social Justice, these people hate England, Europe, Christianity and all forms of decency. Their snarled nihilism is therefore so easily egged on by the kind of "anti-fascists" as organised the Manchester gangs or who egged on the Tottenham gangs. White or black, Asian or Jewish, rich or poor (but invariably well-off), these kind of Communist miscreants see the gangstas as the perfect army for their beliefs.

For years the streets of London and Manchester have been ruled by the gun & drugs crimes and the police have been ineffective. As ineffective as they were when the riots began, because they either (as is usual) go softly, softly and let the gangstas rule the roost (the head anti-fascist gangsta in Manchester boasted on TV, to Donal McIntyre, that they had more guns than the police) or they (very rarely) clamp down hard and then the gangstas and reds move in to stir up "da community" and the bricks and petrol bombs fly.

How can law and order exist in these circumstances? Answer: it can't. It hasn't.

The first job of any government is to keep its own people safe, and yet from the very advent of the failed multi-culti experiment the streets of our cities have not been safe. Remember the NF march in Lewisham in 1977? They had a banner showing a coloured man mugging an English old lady accompanied with the statistics that proved this happened in the vast majority of cases. And yet the police ordered the NF to obscure/redact the profile of the mugger, in an early example of political correctness. As the anti-mugging march progressed it came under a vicious attack from the early gangstas - who had been whipped up and organised by the usual Communist groups.

So as you can see, little has changed.

The state has orchestrated a situation where the streets are not safe. The police on the street must loathe this because they have been emasculated, yet the top cops love it because it has enabled them to grab more and more police state powers, invariably used against "soft targets" such as the English people who sought to defend their communities in Enfield and Eltham. Whilst knife and sword wielding Asians in Dalston and Southall were lauded as heroes by the media and left alone by the police, the Whites were decried as extremists and treated to heavy-handed tactics by the police. Funnily enough the same police refuse to use such tactics in places such as Tottenham and Hackney.

As I said, the first job of the government is to keep the people safe.

They use this as an excuse to start meaningless, unwanted and unneeded foreign wars that are expensive, kill many (our soldiers and foreigners) and simply result in making us an international swear-word.

Yet whilst espousing the safety of the "British people" in starting legally questionable wars, they leave those of us actually on those streets (i.e. not in their rich enclaves and protected by gun-carrying police -- remember ex-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith getting police protection to buy a kebab in London in the afternoon?) at the whims of the gangstas. The little old ladies on estates cower in their homes whilst the "feral rats" run the streets, damage cars, attack passers-by and so on ad nauseum.

The little old lady might phone the police and they may turn up 40 minutes later. Even if the "feral rats" are still there they will be pretty powerless to act. In the rare event of arresting one of them, he will be bailed and back out to make the little old ladies' life a misery (the reason why so many people don't report the "low level" Asbo-style crimes on estates and politicians celebrate that "crime is down" - what idiots!).

If the "feral rats" attack someones car and rob someones house, the population need only wait for the police to show up, some hours later, to give the victim a crime reference number for insurance purposes. Rest assured the crime will rarely be investigated as the police rush off to deal with another crime that happened 4 hours ago.

The system is broken. The criminal justice system is a joke. The police are powerless to act or seen as a joke. The politicians have created a multi-culti nightmare in which the gangstas hold sway. Traditional values such as marriage, Christianity, patriotism and so on are sneered at by the types who run the BBC, which trickles down via the Communist groups and finds resonance in the gangstas (who nlisten to the rap produced by the big labels and pumped out on the BBC).

Peter Hitchens today (source) makes some salient points on this and related matters:

Take our Prime Minister, who is once again defrauding far too many people. He uses his expensive voice, his expensive clothes, his well-learned tone of public-school command, to give the impression of being an effective and decisive  person. But it is all false. He has  no real idea of what to do. He  thinks the actual solutions to the problem are ‘fascist’. Deep down,  he still wants to ‘understand’ the hoodies.
Say to him that naughty children should be smacked at home and caned in school, that the police (and responsible adults) should be free to wallop louts and vandals caught in the act, that the police should return to preventive foot patrols, that prisons should be austere places of hard work, plain food and discipline without TV sets or semi-licit drugs, and that wrongdoers should be sent to them when they first take to crime, not when they are already habitual crooks, and he will throw up his well-tailored arms in horror at your barbarity.
Say to him that divorce should be made very difficult and that the state should be energetically in favour of stable, married families with fathers (and cease forthwith to subsidise families without fathers) and he will smirk patronisingly and regard you as a pitiable lunatic.
Say to him that mass immigration should be stopped and reversed, and that those who refuse any of the huge number of jobs which are then available should be denied benefits of any kind, and he will gibber in shock.

Most people, outside the miasma of the liberal-left and the banking-right, understand this as a fact of life. Undermining marriage, Christianity, abhorrence of drugs, and our white, English communities has resulted in a mess which only those with enough money can escape (how fitting that most politicians had fled abroad when the riots kicked off).

The politicians cannot stop this, because to do so will be to admit that their ideals of the last 50 or so years have been totally wrong. They instead snort coke, fiddle expenses, and cherish their gilt-edged pensions (the kind police, teachers and nurses will no longer get!) whilst  they continue to betray us for their own political ends.

Some will call for more "help" for the multi-culti areas, some will call for water cannons, plastic bullets and more CCTV. Both will fail:

• Help for multi-culti areas will mean poor white areas will be ignored again (something they should be used to!), will mean more pc agendas sucking up the money to confirm the chip-on-shoulder views of the gangstas, more organised crime moving in to cream off the grants. Sure some "projects" may be built, only to be burnt down the next time a gun-tottin' gangsta is shot.
• More police state powers will mean the criminality, broken home, multi culti nightmare carries on, but the police will become more loathed by the gangsta generation, so when violence breaks out it will be more extreme (the police know the gangstas have guns). Meanwhile white communities will face the full force of police state powers for the most minor infringement. CCTV meanwhile will prove useless and merely mean more state control of the law-abiding majority.

We need, as a society, to break free from the stranglehold of the pc brigade, the kind of organised haters who scream abuse when someone like David Starkey dares to get anywhere near the truth. Robert Peston, the chum of the Murdoch-circle who spins his output (see recent Private Eye mags) is a clear example. Despite working for the BBC, Peston poured his bile on Starkey, and said he should be "ignored." Many other rent-a-gobs (e.g. Piers "Morgan" Moron) dived in to pour their abuse on Starkey.

That's right Mr. Media. Run off to your 98% white enclave. Mix with your elite chums - those who loot society every day via their offshore accounting, those who mug society every day via foisting their multi-cult opinions as "the norm". Those who twist the news, spinning against anyone who dares to speak the truth or offer a genuine alternative to the mess we see around us. You know nothing of the white old lady trapped on an estate surrounded by gangsta criminals!

Despite the wishes of the media elite, we should be free to openly discuss:

• The failure of immigration and multi-culti/multi-racism.
• The failure of widespread divorce, single mothers and failing families.
• The failure of drugs policy and the harm that both soft and hard drugs do.
• The role of Communist ("anti fascist") groups in promoting violence.
• The need to promote traditional values - of Faith, Family, Nation.
• The need to think seriously about resettling offspring of immigrants.
• The need to make schools places of learning (using carrot and stick).

This society is failing (has failed?). Police watch as people's homes and businesses are burnt. Gangstas think they rule the streets. Vast areas are no longer English in any meaningful way. The family is all but destroyed in some areas. Too many think drugs are fine and dandy. Too many think the world owes them a living.

In reality only Faith, Family, Nation can save England. Unfortunately too many vested interests cannot allow that to happen and so the downward spiral, in one form or another, will continue.

Meanwhile we can all watch in horror as the Euro and Dollar plunge from crisis to crisis and take the majority of hard-working, tax-paying, mortgage-endebted people of England into another abyss.

England, 2011. It's like the old Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times."








P.S. In today's Mail on Sunday there is a report on a memorial in East London to victims of the Blitz, in the shape of a Dove of Peace which has been attacked and written on by locals from the "ethnically diverse" area "which some think may be racially motivated." Ah! Yet another example of the way immigration has made an area of London as English as a chapati. The Police say they "did receive reports" of the "antisocial behaviour" but - and this may surprise you dear reader - no-one has been arrested despite names and "Asian gang tags" being put on the monument. Instead a fence has gone up (welcome to gulag London) which the gangs tried to cut through with bolt cutters. Such is the proud tradition of tolerance in multi-culti London. Welcome to your future people of Dorset, Shropshire and Cumbria! You can run but you can't hide...

Happy Mother's Day

To Mum: Happy Mother's Day.

Because 'Fascists' have mums too!

Right: Learning my alphabet was always fun.

Iraqi Bombs, Paedophiles, Tony Blair and Happy Marriage

This morning me and Mrs FC had a "debate."

I won't say argument because after 5 years of wedded bliss we don't argue [we've been married much longer, but 5 were blissful ;-)].

So what would cause us to disagree?

We were watching an interview with Kevin Ivison, a former bomb disposal expert who worked in Iraq with the British Army. In his book 'Red One: A Bomb Disposal Expert on the Front Line' he explains his work and the shortcomings of the British Army.

Here's a synopsis from Waterstones:

This is the gripping true story of a young bomb disposal officer and his terrifying experiences in Iraq facing daily rocket attacks and terrorist bombs. When two of his colleagues are killed by a roadside bomb, Kevin Ivison is called in to defuse a second even deadlier bomb just a hundred yards from the bodies of his friends. To make things worse, the entire area is under fire from snipers, and a crowd of angry Iraqis have begun to hurl petrol bombs...With little chance of living through this impossible task, Kevin leaves final messages for his loved ones and sets out alone towards the bomb that he is sure will be the last thing he sees. In this gut-wrenching tale of heroism and survival, Kevin Ivison explains why he chose to be a bomb disposal expert in the first place, how he found the courage to face his death, and the unendurable stress that has given him nightmares ever since.

Whilst watching this brave man being interviewed Mrs FC revealed her radical side when she said that paedophiles should be taken out of prison, sent to war zones and made to clear the bombs.

I interjected that it should be Tony Blair and the other warmongers who were made to do bomb disposal.

There was a distinct frostiness in the air as I put the jam on my toast and stirred my tea.

Then I rescued the situation by telling Mrs FC about how Neo Cons in America were already demanding Obama should attack Iran and how Hans Blix (former UN Weapons Inspector) was saying how ridiculous this was in the shadow of an illegal war over non-existent WMDs.

She concurred, and wedded bliss reigned once more in Le Maison Degrelle.

A lesson for all you newlywed youngsters methinks.


Link:
Waterstones

Fidelity in Marriage and Fidelity to Nationalism

I have always said that the man who cannot show fidelity to his wife, cannot show fidelity to his Nation.

In other words, the man who breaks the vow he made before God (or I guess in these days, before some local council appointee) and shows no honesty in this regard and the promises he made to his wife, will just as easily betray the nationalist cause (or indeed any cause).

Right: We have enough liars, cheats and con men lauding it over us now. We shouldn't tolerate any in Nationalism.

I do not say such a thing in order to promote myself as some sort of "super husband." Far from it as Mrs. FC would be quick to point out.

I believe however that faithfulness to one's spouse is as important as the care of one's children, and the very least one should be capable of as a husband and father.

No parent would, I hope, dream of betraying the trust of their children by willingly putting them in danger. And yet it seems a growing number of 'men' see no problem in putting the very fabric of marriage in danger by cheating on their wives (and vice versa I'm sure, but let's deal with the men here).

As nationalists, as patriots, I would hope that all of us would concur that the family, that marriage, is central to the stability of the nation.

That much, surely, is glaringly obvious.

Aside from mass immigration making vast swathes of England into microcosms of Asia and Africa, with all their tribal conflicts and the societal problems that generations of offspring of mixed cultures bring, I would honestly say that the collapse in the family has played a major part in the UK's downward spiral.

Anti-social crime often stems from broken or dysfunctional 'families.' Drugs run through communities where families have broken-up and the community spirit is lost. A generation of kids grow up with no male role model, or a succession of "uncles" or step-dads.

In this situation some liberal voice - or even a well-meaning soul who has found himself in this situation through no fault of their own - will pipe up and provide the example of a 'broken' family that works well.

And I do not doubt they exist, just as there are old-fashioned families that are a train wreck. But these are the exceptions that prove the rule.

Look across Britain and you see a society where the family has all too often collapsed, and the consequences are there for all to see.

Furthermore I would argue that in the people who are chosen (by media moguls and party systems) to rule us, there is an over-riding lack of honesty.

This was seen in the recent expenses scandal -- which I still insist happened just after the banking crisis because the media were ordered by the banking masters to reek revenge on the politicos who had dared bare their teeth against the bankers.

If the banking collapse hadn't happened, the expenses scandal would have been brushed under the carpet with perhaps a handful of replaceable fall guys taking the heat for all the other money-grubbers and traitors in parliament.

As it was the banks were left reeling after the attacks on them and their practices by all and sundry and -- despite being baled out by the tax-payers taking out more usury-loans to keep them afloat -- they released their attack dogs with the full venom of the expenses scandal.

A perfect example of why money grubbers are always open to control and blackmail .

But let's get back to fidelity in marriage.

Aside from the wider societal issues which I believe every Nationalist - and certainly every Nationalist that considers himself a Christian - must concur with, I think this has grave issues for the individual Nationalist.

As surely as the politicians who 'flipped' their second homes to fiddle their expenses, the nationalist who runs after a 'piece of skirt' just because she flutters her eyelashes at him, or because he has some sort of misguided idea that he has the right to try it on regardless, is showing that he puts his own welfare and well being ahead of anything else.

Such oath breakers will have no trouble in breaking the comradeship of the cause and betraying his compatriots.

What is more obvious still is that the nationalist that cheats on his wife lays himself wide open, as per the MPs' expenses and second home scandal, to coercion, blackmail and suchlike.

Some will say that temptation comes to folk and many slip up and recover and that is perfectly true. It is human nature.

However I do believe that as Nationalists - and especially as (to coin an old phrase) as nationalist 'cadre' material - we need to be showing the example for others to follow.

It's an idea as old as the hills and has been followed the length and breadth of Europe since your daddy was knee high to a grasshopper, but it remains as valid today.

Those who stand up to defend Faith, Family, Nation must be the best examples of fidelity to all three.

To do otherwise is as deluded as someone who says that race-mixing is wrong, that immigration has been a tremendous mistake, that the millions of Third World people in the UK should be humanely resettled in their countries of origin, etc. etc. deciding that taking an African as a mate is hunkydory and fine.

Wouldn't we all decry such an action as rank hypocrisy?

Just so, dear reader, with the nationalist who betrays his wife. There can be no excuse for such shenanigans whether within the movement or outside it.

If we are, one day, to build a new society from the wreckage of the liberal experiment that is spiralling downwards, then what right have we if we are no better than the people we denounce as traitors, cheats, profiteers and charlatans?

There are enough snake oil salesmen in our society without letting the nationalist cause become dominated by them.

The man who shows no loyalty to his wife, will show no loyalty to his nation; because the man with no conscience pertaining to the one closest to him, who he promised to love for life regardless of the circumstance, will have no conscience betraying those who are faces in a room, names on a list and who live miles away.

Anyone who has read the history of Mossad knows that they gain control of enemies in three ways: flattery and unknown bribary; corruption and known bribary; sexual 'honey traps.'

If, for no other positive reason, Nationalists should demand the very highest standards from their activists and leaders.

I have always believed that, and I am yet to be proven wrong.

My Family and Other Animals, or Marmite-Gate II

As any parent will tell you, bringing up children involves far more than that.

One of the many "offshoots" of all the stresses and strains of bringing up children to know right from wrong, especially in this topsy turvey world (in which, as GK Chesterton said, the traditionalist is the revolutionary), is the menagerie of animals they plead for.

I am not a pushover in this regard, but I also believe in rewarding good behaviour and achievements and thus, over the years, we have had quite a roll call of animals.

So it was this year, our little band grew by one more and we bought a rabbit.

But what to call him?

There were many suggestions from the obvious (Benjamin Bunny) to the more obscure and extreme (Leon Degrelle - I'm not saying who voted for that one).

Finally we all turned to the youngest sprog to make the final decision.

It was destiny! The name was meant to be, because without a moment's hesitation (it is claimed to be something to do with the little bunny's colouring) the name was announced as we all stood agog:

Marmite.

I just hope we don't get a letter through the post from Unilever. Mind you, Gen. Degrelle isn't bad for a back-up...

Euthanasia and Murder by G.K. Chesterton

Euthanasia and Murder

There is no law against a man biting off his own nose, unless it be a law of nature; nor even any police regulation against his hanging himself up by the hair or whiskers to talk to his friends and family in greater discomfort. There are penalties for suicide but, though I have no suicidal habits myself, I fancy they must be rather hard to apply; since they could only be sharpened into the legal and logical paradox of hanging a man to cure him of wanting to be hanged.

The majestic legislative mind of man does not commonly concentrate specially on forbidding things that nobody would normally want to do. Most probably, there never would have been any laws at all, except against things that men do quite naturally and even passionately want to do. Men punished murder precisely because there are such a large number of persons whom it would seem quite natural, and almost necessary, to murder. Men forbade theft because it is so utterly obvious that any fool could see it, that some property is in the wrong hands, and that anybody might think it would be better applied in his own hands; any fool could see it, any fool could say it, and the law was made because any fool might do it. There was a third commandment, against stealing not only our neighbor's ass, but our neighbor's wife, on which it would now be indelicate to dwell, because all the fools have done it.

Now about this, the Modern Mind has passed through two stages, and I do not know which is worse; for the Modern Mind is rather a weak mind. In the nineteenth century, roughly speaking, all respectable people seemed to suppose that nobody could be tempted to murder or theft or adultery, if he was really respectable. They thought these temptations only came to a curious remote tribe of monsters, called the Criminal Class. We were solemnly told that every criminal must be a lunatic; when in fact there is hardly a healthy or sane man who gets through forty-eight hours without some temptation to commit some such crime.

Then suddenly the Modern Mind discovered this and (not being a very strong mind) instantly slumped into the opposite extreme. Like most moderately intelligent people, I read detective stories in preference to modern novels; but even in detective stories I find this queer rudimentary reason creeping up. Even in crime stories there is now some comprehension of crime; that is, of the fact that we are all criminals. And now the whole weakness is working the other way; many recent murder stories are actually justifications of murder. The moment a refined respectable gentleman realizes that he might want to kill somebody, he jumps to the conclusion that this person ought to be killed. The fact that Aunt Jane is obviously a nuisance, that Uncle William is becoming a terrible bore, that Cousin Hildebrand stands between us and the really sensible family solution, is beginning to look more and more like a real reason for doing them in. That is why, in my own country, some are proposing what is called Euthanasia; at present only a proposal for killing those who are a nuisance to themselves; but soon to be applied progressively to those who are a nuisance to other people. As it applies by hypothesis to an almost moribund or partially paralyzed person, the decision will presumably rest with the other people.

It all began, of course, with stealing our neighbor's wife as well as his ass; because she was more of an ass than the ass. If we want to know how this allowance for exception ruins or replaces the rule, the best example is divorce. Those who first urged it, urged it quite honestly as an extreme exception. They did really mean to apply it only to somebody married to a homicidal maniac. It has come to mean that a leading literary man told me on a platform in New York that no man could remain married to a woman who said, "Right-O." I thought he might have avoided being married to a woman who said, "Right-O." It has come to the point when a man advertises his desire to be divorced from a woman, only because he has forgotten her name. How jolly it will be when the sanctity of human life has reached the same stage as the sanctity of marriage! When men do not even remember whom they have murdered, as this gentleman could not remember whom he had married. Is it not time we reasserted the principle, known to primitive men, that the things we desire to do are the things we may be restrained in doing; and it is because we are all criminals that we had better be discouraged from crime?

(From The American Review, Feb. 1937)

Working Mums

A cartoon here for all the careerist feminists, absentee "fathers" and everyone else who puts down stay-at-home mums as if they 'do nothing.'

The hand that rocks the cradle will bring about the next generation of our people... we cast aside that role to the state, private institutions etc. at our peril.

London, July 4th, NF Anti-Homosexual Demo

ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL DEMO, LONDON 4/7/09

Left: The Mayor of London -- bonkin' Boris -- joins the homosexual lobby. Circa 0.4% of the population may have homosexual tendencies, but that doesn't mean we should all be held hostage by a degenerate minority any more than we should let psychotic people run government. Can we expect any elected representatives to join the anti-homosexual demo or at least publicly support it? Or -- like Boris -- are they too interested in positive headlines?

Our Comrades in the National Front are organising a counter demo to London "Gay Pride" on Saturday the 4th of July.

We would urge all nationalists, patriots and folk of good will to join the NF demo against the degenerate forces backed by this sterile and foetid government/system.

In the past the homosexuals and their allies have tried to use heavy handed tactics against the nationalists whilst the forces of "law n order" look on (just as they ignore the obscene behaviour and dress of the militant faggots - despite the laws of the land).

As such it is vital that everyone, at least in the Greater London region, should support this NF demo and get along there to show London and the whole of England that plenty of people are opposed to the cancer that is the militant, anti-family, homosexual lobby.

Please spread the word and do your best to attend.

If you would like to attend please phone the NF organiser on:

07849 748605.

Euthanasia Talk Stopped in Cork, Ireland

Ireland left a deep impression on GK Chesterton when he was there in 1918. He, like us, would be proud of the Irish militants who are fighting for the rights of all Europeans today.

An Anon reader of this blog left this response to an earlier post:

"Off topic but last night in Cork here in Ireland, Professor Len Doyal the proponent of both voluntary and non voluntary euthanasia was sent packing. His lecture was cancelled.

"Well done to all involved in stopping the talk at Cork Hospital.

"It features in many of the Irish newspapers but last night highlighted clear opposition to any foisting of the euthanasia agenda in Ireland.

"Len Doyal is not welcome in Ireland."

Well done to the Irish. Yet again when it comes to protecting the sanctity of human life, the Irish have proven themselves worthy adversaries of the Masonic agenda.

Link:
Irish Independent on Cork Lecture
Youth Defence Lobbied Against Lecture
Irish TV on Cancelled Talk

Happy St Patrick's Day 2009

A very Happy St Patrick's Day to all our Irish readers and supporters of Irish descent.

Who would have thought a decade or two back - with Ireland's media bamboozling the people with EU handouts - that Ireland would become a beacon of freedom for those seeking the downfall of the socialist EU?

With Ireland also holding back the tidal wave of anti-family pro-mass murder laws so central to the EU's neo-Bolshevism and Masonic consumerist atheism, we have a lot to thank "little" Ireland with its 3 million (?) souls for.

Moreover how many activists are responsible for organising Ireland's defiance? Probably in truth a few hundred.

As the drunken war criminal Churchill once said, never have so many owed so much to so few.

So "cheers" to all our Irish comrades for everything they have done to save European culture and civilisation from the machinations of those who think they can own, control and bully all of us.

The Irish have shown that it doesn't have to be that way.

Christmas Assault is Homosexual/Abortion Conspiracy

This is a fascinating piece.

Who bankrolls Planned Parenthood whose candidate now sits in the White House - the media's secular saint, Bull###t Obama?

Can we safely assume that Planned Parenthood is one of the offshoots of the Rothschilds and the New World Order (like the ADL, CFR etc.)

Nationalists must be far more aware of this! Far too many think abortion, homosexuality etc. are "side issues" and, let's be fair, those groups who have become the Zionist defenders of "Western humanism" and little more than anti-Muslim pressure valves, have become ambivalent (at best!) when it comes to abortion, homosexuality and other attacks on the family (after all, the "muzzies" oppose them, so the right of degenerate scum to buy butt plugs must be defended!).

What is clear from even the briefest reading of this piece is that there has been a CONSPIRACY since the 60s by Planned Parenthood (and others) to attack the family and Christian values per se.

Time for nationalists to wake up and fight the real enemy, and not be side-tracked by CIA created ghosts and agent provocateur spook activists (you think it's beneath them -- remember C18?)



WHY THEY FEAR CHRISTMAS by Frank M Rega


Michael Matt's Christmas editorial in The Remnant, "From Bethlehem to Calvary," notes that a burgeoning Christophobia has launched a concerted attack on the birthday of Jesus. Mr. Matt asks just what are these grinches afraid of?

I believe one clue is to be found in the disturbing memo recently made available on the web by Randy Engel at her U.S. Coalition for Life site, www.uscl.info. In this heinous 1969 memo from Planned Parenthood to the Population Council, numerous strategies for controlling world population growth are outlined. The current implementation of many of these proposed policies from forty years ago illustrates the power and influence of the Population Control machine. For example, one of their nefarious schemes is to "encourage increased homosexuality." Yes, your children are being exposed to this life style not because anyone really cares about some nebulous self-fulfillment or self-expression, but because rampant homosexuality will contribute to population reduction!

Abortion, contraception, denigration of marriage, propagandizing women to abandon their homes and enter the workforce, control of education, etc., it's all there in this 1969 blueprint, including compulsory sterilization and child-bearing limits.

The celebration of the birthday of Jesus is the worst nightmare of the Population Control lobby. During this season, the birth of a male child is literally glorified throughout the land. This event is presented as a time of great joy and happiness, with hymns commemorating it. The grotto becomes an archetype of the domestic hearth, with a husband and wife presenting their lovely new-born baby to warmly-welcomed visitors and strangers. And to make matters worse for the Population Control Grinches, the spouses are of opposite sexes!

December 25th flies in the face of the entire secular New World Order agenda, with its anti-family, anti-traditional-marriage, anti-childbirth, and anti-God satanic program. As we know, they even hate the very word "Christmas," attempting to eliminate mention of it in the public square. But the more they attack this Holy Day, the more we should promote it, since it is a Divine wedge uprooting their evil machinations. It teaches us that the birth of a child is something joyful and wonderful, not a "punishment" as President Obama has contended *. And that is why they are afraid of Christmas.

Following is the link to the above mentioned memo containing the deplorable agenda of the Population Control machine:
http://uscl.info/edoc/doc.php?doc_id=49&action=inline.

* http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/apr/08040105.html

Link:
Why They Fear Christmas

P.S. A friend read Rega's book on St Francis's attempts to convert the Muslims and said it was very interesting!

Report Blames Selfish Parents for Childhood Problems

So the selfish individualism of the sons and daughters of the 60s generation has lead to children today being damaged, according to the largest report on the subject.

The Children's Society report had 35,000 contributors and places consumerism and selfishness at the heart of damage done to children.

We are told that more government initiatives and social engineering are the answer to the number of families with one parent or a step-parent.

The elephant in the room is the demolition of marriage that's occurred since the 50s/60s; the promotion of abortion and "gay rights" by a succession of governments and a benefits system which has, to use the parlance in vogue, "institutionalised" the attack on marriage.

It strikes me as common sense, that if we wish to create the best possible scenario across society and within families for the upbringing of children who, in turn, will be well developed and productive members of society, that a few simple steps need to be taken.

I'm thinking primarily of the cessation of "rewarding" single parents with council housing; of tax incentives for married couples and especially married couples with children; help and incentives for mums who make the decision (often financially detrimental) to stay at home to care for their children.

Moreover there needs to be a sea-change in public policy in regards to the family. The days of undermining the family at every turn has to end!

It's hardly rocket science!

Most people - even the politically correct - will acknowledge that the "nuclear family" is the best possible setting for the upbringing of children, so why on earth does the government promote "other forms" of parenting, co-habiting, civil-partnerships and the pic-n-mix 57 varieties of "families" to the detriment of the family?

We are all paying the cost whether it's in the taxes which go to social services, or the insurance premiums we pay on damage done by miscreants to our cars or homes, and many other ways in which the handful of failing quasi-families do.

In all the places I have lived in my meandering existence, I have noticed that most problems (if not outright crimes) in communities, from urban to suburban to outright rural, come from a small number of families in any one area.

If we can, as a society, put the family back as the cornerstone of society, promote the family as the best possible structure for bringing up children, give incentives for couples to marry and raise children... we will not only see less problems in our communities, but we might even begin to rectify many of the problems facing us as an ageing society.

A dwindling workforce and aging population means the pension system is crumbling and politicians (once this "credit crunch" ends will, again) tell us we "need" immigrants to work, fill posts and pay taxes.

Would we rather live in a greying, dying (and "browning") country, wherein the family decays, and where children with no male role model become ever more the norm, or a vibrant nation in which the family is placed at the centre -- and life and youth is seen as a gift, which will enable these isles to have a future?

Communists tried and failed to bring about the end of the family via collectivisation.

The Capitalists are now trying to bring about the death of the family via the burden of debt on families (forcing both parents to work) and the promotion of a "do what thou wilt" society where the golden calf of "choice" enables us all to be selfish, and sacrifice children or the care of children for own well-being.

Can we as nationalists raise the banner for the family? Can we show that the sacrifice needed to raise children, and to raise children well, is worthwhile: for us, for our community and for our nation?

Unfortunately there is no short-term fix. To put the family first is going to take years, if not decades, of hard slog and struggle. But, to be frank, we have no choice - because to do otherwise would be to surrender to the forces that are out to destroy every last vestige of family life.

It's going to take more that Tory-style empty slogans too.


Link
BBC on Childhood Report

Woolworths: The Sad Truth for Many

Being a family man I found myself in a town centre today, taking back a non-functioning electrical Christmas pressie (egged on by a distraught sprog).

The story ended happily when the item was replaced and we continued with our assortment of errands, some of a banking nature, some comestible (those corned beef pasties won't eat themselves y'know!) and others of a more commercial/fanciful ensemble.

All of a sudden I felt an urge to pop into the local Woolworths and witness a bit of history and so - admittedly with little persuasion (or percussion!) needed on my part with Mrs FC and the FC sprogs - we found ourselves in a very eerie and strange Woolworths shop.

Most of the shelves were empty, many of them with "sold" stickers on, with people buying the fixtures and fittings.

One wall even had photocopies of things as mundane as office chairs, the branch safe (empty?) and the staff cooker for sale. It made my pic n mix free for all ("5 sweets each kids! Fill yer boots" -- not literally obviously) seem a bit tame, as some local yokels filled trolleys with bits of display stands.

Now, I'm not one to shed a tear for unbridled Capitalism and Big Businesses, but as with many of those interviewed on the news viz this episode of the "Credit Crunch," I find it a bit sad to see this happen.

When I was knee-high to a grasshopper (a pre-FC sprog if you will) I remember going to visit one of my myriad of unrelated "aunties" who worked in 'Woolies,' standing on tip-toe as I tried to see over the counter. So it is that Woolworths entered the early memories of many people, and we all feel an era is passing.

So what should we feel with the passing of Woolworths? I can't feel sorry for Big Business or multinationals. I couldn't even tell you who owns Woolworths. But there are people we should feel sorry for: the 27,000 employees of Woolworths who face a future on the dole.

Unemployment can never be easy, but going onto the dole with so many others (add on those from MFI and other firms going bust) and at the start of a recession must seem like the beginning of a long black night for many of them.

And that's what went through my mind yesterday as I took in the vista of all the decimated shelving units and dismantled point-of-sale bumf languishing in corners.

It's easy for Gordon Brown to play "saviour of the world" because he's used our tax-money for generations to come (via enslaving us to a super-duper blow-your-mind national debt) to "bail out" the banks and keep the greedy amoral scum, who lived high on the hog whilst the debt bubble grew and grew, in their positions.

Yet he stands by useless as a chocolate teapot as 27,000 Woolworths employees - from the shelf-stackers, through the till-tappers to the junior management - get a Christmas Present of a P45.

The Saviour of the World - Super Gordon? - gets in debt with the banks to bail-out the banks (heads they win, tails you lose) and the "normal" folks get covered in guano.

Perhaps if the Woolworths staff had been as greedy and as avaricious, gambling other people's money, then Super Gordon would have forked out a few billion to bail them out too?

And why not!

Let Gordon do a one-off payment and convert Woolies into a Workers Co-Operative, wherein the workers split the profits depending on the hours they work.

It might just work. It might just save him much more in long term dole, housing benefit etc. It might just save the high street. It might just show that Super Gordon cares for more than just Banking Bosses and Car firms owned by Indians.

And, as I paid for the few goodies selling at 50% and walked out of Woolies probably for the last time, I couldn't help think of all this and of Gordon Brown's skewed sense of loyalty and proportion.

Still, at least so many of the banksters and City of London wide-boys enjoyed blow-out Christmas parties.

That must be a comfort to all those facing 2009 being unemployed.

Last Week's Quote: Oliveira Salazar on Your Duty to Your Children

"Teach your sons labour, teach your daughters modesty, teach to everyone the virtues of the economy. And if you cannot make them saints, at least make them good Christians."


António de Oliveira Salazar,
Portuguese Prime Minister 1933-1968.


How far removed from the dole-bum, drug-taking, rip-off, usurious "do what thou wilt" society created by our politicians.

Last Week's Quote: Don Corleone on Real Men

"...a man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."


Don Corleone character,
The Godfather (film).

Ex-Godfather Nails Family Break-Up as Cause of Crime

An ex-Mafia man who recanted after leaving jail was being interviewed on BBC TV's Hardtalk tonight (on BBC News 24). His name was Louis Ferrante.

He made various interesting comments on the racial nature of the prison system in America, the need for reform in the system etc. etc.

One thing he was crystal clear on though. His words went something like: 'In 9 out of 10, no in 10 out of 10 of cases inside, the prisoners came from broken homes.'

Here was a hardened man. An ex-Mafia boss. From an Italian background. He had recanted of his ways. he had no real axe to grind, he even said (cliché detectors at the ready) that 'prison was the best thing that ever happened to me.'

Yet he clearly saw that as well as the prison system failing to educate and reform the inmates themselves, the one common factor was family breakdown.

Yet still our political masters, the pocket-stuffing quango members and the (chuckle chuckle) "experts" will tell us that this is nonsense, that all kinds of "families" are loving and caring, that fathers are a luxury not a necessity, that the family itself does not deserve extra support, and that marriage is an archaic/medieval idea.

As usual, they know best. Or think they do!

So whilst the prison system and ridiculous court system try to paper over the cracks, the family continues to fall apart after decades of liberalism, feminism and "do what thou wilt" politics.

What about sacrifice? What about commitment? What about fidelity?

Unless we can resurrect these ideals, these goals, these standards then our society will die.

Link: Louis Ferrante site

----

Having managed to catch the Ferrante interview again on BBC News 24 (having only seen the last 5-10 minutes last night) it seems that he has become a "devout Jew." I assume he was born a Jew and as he claimed he reported directly to one of the NY Mafia's "five families" one wonders if this further underlines the relationship between Jewish hoodlums and the Mafia going back generations, via Murder Inc. etc.

Of course none of this detracts from Ferrante's comments on family breakup = criminals.