Trevor Phillips: Multi-Culti Bully Boy of a Growing Police State

"Toe the line" is the cry from the promoter of mass coloured immigration, homosexual rights and much else that is bad in 'modern Britain.'

He says that if Christians see that a 'law' does not fit with the morality of Christianity (queer adoption, abortion, homo-rights, euthanasia, usury etc.) then Christians should follow the law of the land, in effect that "we" have to choose between our religion (our heritage, our civilisation, our roots, our forefathers) or the "law of the land" -- the threat being that if we choose the former we somehow become OUTLAWS.

How long before the police knock on doors of those who speak out against queer rights? How long before the police turn up and arrest a Christian being beaten up by homosexuals because he gave out leaflets or held a placard with a Biblical quote?

Next year? Next week? Tomorrow? Think again patriot! These things have already happened.

From the bosses of Westminster's quangos and the Race Lobby to the Masonic police chiefs who enforce Acts of Parliament passed by degenerates and traitors, to the Charity Commissioners who shut down adoption agencies who wouldn't house children with poofs... 1984 and much worse is already starting, and it's all around us.

It is our duty to speak out when we can, make our friends and neighbours aware. We cannot allow what was once dismissed as the "loony left" (Frankfurt School Marxists) to hold sway over public policy without fighting back.

There are plenty of bodies out there fighting back, professionally organised and looking for help. Look them up, join them, give their materials to those interested in your community.

If we lose this fight the enemies of civilisation will not give up the ground they gain. Network, educate yourself, be intelligent and join the resistance however you can.

Link:
Trevor Phillips Says Christians Must Choose

Police State Run by Bankers and Masons

This bloke - as my children would say - totally 'owns' a policeman who seems to think that any protest needs to be lodged with the Big brother state, and bluffs his way by threatening to arrest someone who has done NOTHING wrong.

If only orgenised parties like the BNP stood up and denounced the banking and taxation system - based on usury slavery which should be totally illegal - they might win support from right acoss the political spectrum.

Who wants questionable and unjust wars before schools and hospitals?

Who wants taxes going to billionaire financiers when it should be given back to those paying it or small amounts taken to help the needy?

After yours of quasi-Zionist b.s. blaming the Muslims for everything [rather than coloured immigration simply being a part of the NWO assault on our freedoms and rights] and selling out to a political system run by the Masonic elites for baubles and scraps from their table; it is time that NATIONALISTS made it clear that we are the people against usury, against the financiers, against Zionism and its wars.

We have been betrayed for years.



In part one of this series the activist DOES make some mistakes - primarily confusing the "corporations" of Fascist Italy with todays Big Businesses, multi-nationals and international finance.

The Corporations of Fascist Italy were in fact akin to the medieval Guilds, and so were like the Trade Unions representatives having seats in government, so the workers from all trades had direct representation in government.

That is fascism. Fascism was a socio-economic ideal based on Christian social teaching. It was not giving the goverment to alien financiers, Freemasons and Mafioso.

This government is! It is uber-Capitalism. CAPITAL and its power, its tax, its usury, RUINS our lives, empties our pockets.

Fascism was popular. It was national. It gave freedom. It may not have been perfect, what system run by men ever could be (we live in societies not false utopias)? But compared to the debt slavery today it is a world apart.

We aren't even safe on our streets! Whilst the government gives billions to financiers and billions to needless Zionist wars, WE ARE NOT EVEN SAFE ON OUR OWN STREETS.

Why not have a war on mugging? A war on anti-social behaviour? A war on street gangs?

That would make peoples' lives much better than dropping million pound (financially speaking!) bombs on varies countries, or giving billions to mega-rich bankers.

Nationalists must start speaking these truths. Otherwise, by omission or commision, we are taking part in the biggest scandal in history - the enslavement of our people and many others too.

Gwent Police Found Not Guilty of Assault - Look at the Evidence

Be careful in Gwent, South Wales.

These officers did the following after a 71 year old man "failed to stop" after they saw he was not wearing his seat belt.

Yep. Never mind the druggies, the people traffickers, the muggers, the car thieves, the burglars...

There are people out there not wearing their seat belts! It's time to teach these criminals, these people who know better than the State, to be taught a lesson.

Over to you officers:



The happy news is that these valiant officers, having cornered this heinous criminal and being forced to defend themselves, after having been suspended from duty are now free to take up their duties again after being found not guilty.

It's not that we think the police should be there to serve the interests of tax-payers, but rather that if when we all reach our 70s, we might be free to not wear a seat belt. And if by chance we do not notice the police, or become scared and drive off - they won't act like the ###ing SAS!

"Another dangerous criminal off the streets sarge!"

European Arrest Warrants: A Blow Against Natural Justice

In this week's Private Eye [#1252] there's an interesting piece on European Arrest Warrants (EAWs) and their abuse.

They highlight three cases in Greece, France and Portugal of trials which fell way below accepted norms (flimsiest evidence, guilt in abstentia and more).

Of course for nationalists we have to worry that German laws on questioning history could mean the extradition of British subjects who have broken no UK law, on the flimsiest of evidence by political courts.

This is the way the European Union is heading and it should worry anyone who believes in the rights of nations to assert their own laws, traditions, justice, rights, let alone free and fair trials without undue pressure whether from jingoistic media, corrupt local officials or a political class.

Wasn't Fredrick Toben (pictured above), who was convicted of the bizarre crime (sic) of "offending the memory of the dead" in Germany in 1999 [Oliver Cromwell was a despot who banned Christmas - am I guilty too?], almost extradited from Britain on a 2004 EAW despite being an Australian citizen [and thus, for better or worse, a subject of Her Maj] and having broken no UK law? Only the brave decision by District Judge Daphne Wickham ruled the warrant invalid as it contained inadequate detail about the offences.

Even back in the early 80s Margaret Thatcher's government had the sense to see through arrest warrants issued by Italian Communist mayors and officials against young nationalists (Fiore, Morsello and others), charges based on corrupted evidence (sic) and guilty verdicts obtained in abstentia, which have since been disproved in the Italian courts (and various newspapers - in Italy and the UK - which spread the Communist lies having been successfully sued).

So if you have the chance read the article in Private Eye (on page 32, within the "In The Back" section of the magazine) and you will understand why the cases of Andrew Symeou, Deborah Dark and Gary Mann should have all patriots worried.

The sad thing is that liberals and leftists (inc/or/and Private Eye journalists) have chosen to ignore cases such as Toben's for shady political reasons and the Good Friday get-out clause ("they hid... for fear of the..." [Zionists of the day, ahem!]).

Big Brother is not around the corner. As more British citizens are finding out for themselves, Big Brother is alive and well and living in Brussels.

Yahoo Sells E-Mail Content to Spooks

http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=622292
Posted: Sunday 6th December

Something Mathaba has alleged since 10 years, has now come into the
open with the proof of U.S. email companies spying on their users.

Yahoo Sells All Its Users Private Email Contents to U.S. Agencies for Small Price
From: Mathaba*

Yahoo isn't happy that a detailed menu of the spying services it provides to "law enforcement" and spy agencies has leaked onto the web.

After earlier reports this week that Yahoo had blocked an FOIA Freedom of Information release of its "law enforcement and intelligence price list", someone helpfully provided a copy of the Yahoo company's spying guide to the whistleblower web site Cryptome.org.

The 17-page guide, which Yahoo has tried to suppress via legal letters to the Cryptome.org site run by freedom of information champion John Young, describes Yahoo's policies on keeping the data of Yahoo Email and Yahoo Groups users, as well as the surveillance and spying capabilities it can give to the U.S. government and its agencies.

The Yahoo document is a price list for these spying services and has already resulted in many people closing down their accounts in protest. However, closing a Yahoo account is not as easy as one might expect: users have reported great difficulty in finding the link to delete their account, and, Yahoo will still keep data for another 90 days.

If you ask Yahoo! to delete your Yahoo! account, in most cases your account will be deactivated and then deleted from our user registration database in approximately 90 days. This delay is necessary to discourage users from engaging in fraudulent activity.
Please note that any information that we have copied may remain in back-up storage for some period of time after your deletion request. This may be the case even though no information about your account remains in our active user databases.

Many government leaders and officials around Africa, Asia and Latin America are known by Mathaba to widely be using Yahoo, Gmail, and Hotmail in spite of these Email services being hosted on U.S. computers and the ease that gives the hosts to access their data.. Mathaba has also long been aware of a great many business people, politicians and even Presidents who use the "free" web-based email services of Yahoo for their Email communications, thus making it easy for the U.S. and its owners to spy on them with negligible cost.

Cryptome also published lawful data-interception guides for Cox Communications, SBC, Cingular, Nextel, GTE and other telecoms and Internet service providers.

But of all those companies, it appears to be Yahoo's lawyers alone who have been stupid enough to try to issue a "DMCA takedown notice" to Cryptome demanding the document be removed. Yahoo claims that publication of the document is a copyright violation, and gave Cryptome owner John Young a Thursday deadline for removing the document.

We estimate Yahoo stand a near-zero chance of success given that Young has thousands of intelligence and other leaked documents on his site and in the past decade has yet to remove a single document upon legal threats, the same 10-year track record held by Mathaba on documents on British Intelligence in spite of having computers seized and properties raided.

Mathaba is now also hosting the Yahoo leaked document on its servers around the world, and the cat is long out of the bag with the original document having been downloaded and distributed by many already.

When John Young was asked if there was anything he wouldn't reveal on his site -- a fault in the President's Secret Service detail, for instance -- he said, "Well, I'm actually looking for that information right now", much to the chagrin of those who believe that the U.S. government and its hopelessly corrupt agencies should have a right to supress information from the public.

The Compliance Guide reveals, as has been known to Mathaba prior to the leak via our own sources, that Yahoo does not retain a copy of e-mails that an account holder sends unless that customer sets up the account to store those e-mails. Yahoo also cannot search for or produce deleted e-mails once they've been removed from a user's trash folder.

The guide also reveals that the company retains the IP addresses from which a user logs in for just one year. But the company's logs of IP addresses used to register new accounts for the first time go back to 1999. The contents of accounts on Flickr, the photo sharing and storage site which Yahoo also owns, are purged as soon as a user deactivates the account.

Chats conducted through the company's Web Messenger service may be saved on Yahoo's server if one of the parties in the correspondence set up their account to archive chats. This pertains to the web-based version of the chat service, however. Yahoo does not save the content of chats for consumers who use the downloadable Web Messenger client on their computer.

Instant message logs are retained 45 to 60 days and includes an account holder's friends list, and the date and times the user communicated with them.

Young responded to Yahoo's takedown request with a defiant note:

I cannot find at the Copyright Office a grant of copyright for the Yahoo spying document hosted on Cryptome. To assure readers Yahoo's copyright claim is valid and not another hoary bluff without substantiation so common under DMCA bombast please send a copy of the copyright grant for publication on Cryptome.

Until Yahoo provides proof of copyright, the document will remain available to the public for it provides information that is in the public interest about Yahoo's contradictory privacy policy and should remain a topic of public debate on ISP unacknowledged spying complicity with officials for lucrative fees.

Note: Yahoo's exclamation point is surely trademarked so omitted here.
The company responded that a copyright notice is optional for works created after March 1, 1989 and repeated its demand for removal on Thursday. For now, the document remains on the Cryptome site.

Threat Level reported Tuesday that muckraker and Indiana University graduate student Christopher Soghoian had asked all agencies within the Department of Justice, under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, to provide him with a copy of the pricing list supplied by telecoms and internet service providers for the surveillance services they offer government agencies. But before the agencies could provide the data, Verizon and Yahoo intervened and filed an objection on grounds that the information was proprietary and that the companies would be ridiculed and publicly shamed were their surveillance price sheets made public.

Yahoo wrote in its objection letter that if its pricing information were disclosed to Soghoian, he would use it "to 'shame' Yahoo! and other companies — and to 'shock' their customers."

"Therefore, release of Yahoo!'s information is reasonably likely to lead to impairment of its reputation for protection of user privacy and security, which is a competitive disadvantage for technology companies," the company added.

The price list that Yahoo tried to prevent the government from releasing to Soghoian appears in one small paragraph in the 17-page leaked document. According to this list, Yahoo charges the government about $30 to $40 for the contents, including e-mail, of a subscriber's account. It charges $40 to $80 for the contents of a Yahoo group.

Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and other U.S. "social networking" sites are at minimum providing information in similar fashion to U.S. agencies, and in some cases have also received substantial funding by U.S. government related entities as a most efficient and cost-effective means of spying on their users around the world.
----------------
*Includes extensive reporting by Wired.com's Kim Zetter

Jade Goody: Alco-Pops Generation Memento Mori

A 27 year old woman was buried yesterday. That's always a sad affair because 27 is really when your life is in full swing, with kids, a home, etc. etc.

But the woman was Jade Goody, the bete noir of Channel 4's Big Brother.

Not so long ago she was a pariah. After making her "Essex girl" credentials a "dead cert" (grand national fever dontcha know!) by stating East Anglia was a foreign country, she became persona non grata via her public row with an Indian Bollywood star in Channel 4's Celebrity Big Brother - which was deemed "racist."

The media heaped scorn and even hatred on her. Not the swearing, prancing, mincing, degenerate, genetic-mess, weirdos that appeared on the show over the years (I must confess to have never having seen it, but have listened to what others have said and read some opinions on it) but someone they deemed "racist."

This of course showed that to the media any form of filth, degeneracy, blasphemy, sexual-profligacy is nothing compared to "racism" which they deem the great evil of our age.

This is why I viewed the media furore and interest in her long publicised death from cervical cancer with great cynicism.

The media's "dumb evil racist" became "the peoples' princess II."

Oh fickle media is there no stone you won't overturn, no butt you will not kiss, no barrel you will not scrape to appear popular and sell more papers?

And we wonder where our politicians get it from!!!

Populism is a jealous mistress who changes her flings and affections week on week.

I suppose her family should be grateful she didn't have the intelligence to question the Zionist WW2 propaganda that allows Israel to commit mass murder and ethnic cleansing 60 years on, otherwise she would have gone to a pauper's grave as a hatemonger (despite caring for the treatment of the world's most attacked, besmirched, exiled and betrayed people, the Palestinians).

If nothing else all this has been a lesson in the media, in the false world of "celebrity" (large chunk of salt included).

But let me add an addendum to my scribblings, dribblings and dawdlings.

There is a slight good to come of this, for the people - and I'm thinking of those immersed in the lager and wine drinking world of the Sun readers, Eastenders and Big Brother watching working classes, but even the materialist, celeb-watching middle classes too - watching this story.

This story will act like one of our Medieval/Renaissance Memento Mori paintings or songs, in that it will call to mind to the "do what thou wilt" generation, busy binging on drugs and indulging in their "metrosexual" degeneracy that they are mortals and that death will come.

Most of them may think they will rot in a box, or that Nirvana awaits, or that they will come back as a butterfly and other nonsenses that have filled the God void that GK Chesterton wrote about (i.e. idiots believing in anything rather than nothing); but a significant minority will have that kernel of Christianity to realise that their life will have to be accounted for.

A favourite Biblical quote of mine is Christ saying that he will return "like a thief in the night." Some people may think that relates to the second coming and/or Judgement Day, and well it might. But I've always thought it relates to our own moment of death.

Who knows when they will die? When that fatal car crash will happen? When that disease may strike? Those with cancer have some warning, and I recall the moving words of Massimo Morsello that great Italian Nationalist leader when I sat with him in a London restaurant. Our companions had left and I was left with him and his young child. By that time he was too weak to lift her out of the high chair.

It was then that he said something to me that will always stay in my mind as long as I live. He said that he thanked God for giving him the time to sort out his life in time, so that he could meet his maker with a clear conscience. The time he had been given - no doubt racked with physical and moral pains - he saw as a gift from God.

Some people, in his shoes, might have chosen to "rage at the dying of the light" and curse the cancer that had riddled his body. Yet here was a man who was no weakling in his life, who had fought bravely in the world of politics and business, and he had embraced his oncoming death (whilst trying to elongate his life for the sake of his family) as a fact of life.

So will the death of Jade Goody, a modern "celebrity," famous for being famous, make a few more of us confront the reality of death?

Will more of us live life as it should be, mindful of the "four last things" (death, judgement, heaven and hell) that we will ultimately meet our maker who will come like a thief in the night? Will more of the Jade Goody watchers turn off Eastenders? Turn down the next batch of drugs? Miss out the nightclubs and anonymous sex? Will more of the politicos stop covering up financial scandals, stop making excuses for paedophiles and other degenerates out of "party loyalty?"

They may recall the demise of Heath Ledger for whom Christ really will appear like a 'thief in the night' - a most unwelcome intruder on the life of a man who promoted homosexuality for big money and who used that money to purchase recreational drugs to abuse his body.

If just a handful do, then perhaps some good will have come from Jade Goody's death.

With yesterday's headlines being today's fish and chip wrappings no doubt the media whores will move on with their next populist agenda, maybe someone who has "overcome racism" to be a symbol of "modern multi-racial Britain" etc. etc. and so the whole media circus will roll on, another day another dollar, someone else to get their 15 minutes of fame.

C'est la vie. C'est la morte?

The Culture of Greed & the Need for Absolute Change

MORE CORRUPTION - MORE EXCUSES

TO COIN A PHRASE: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

A Sunday newspaper has alleged that "our" Home Secretary - Jaqcui Smith - is fiddling the system, by classing her sister's house in London as her "London Home" (when she could use a free government one, apparently there's a few standing empty) so she can get circa £30K a year.

Right: Just because they work in the Palace of Westminster, doesn't give our politicians to act like Royalty, escaping censure at every turn with a feeble excuse or a half-hearted apology.

This is designed so MPs in Scotland, Cumbria, Northern Ireland, Newcastle and areas too far away to be able to commute can work at Westminster and have somewhere to stay/live when not in their constituencies; not so that MPs (or ministers!) with constituencies nearby can - allegedly - fiddle the system and - allegedly - pocket tens of thousands of pounds.

Some time ago I wrote a review of Justin Barrett's book The National Way Forward (see link below for Reds' ranting against Barrett). In this book the Irish Pro-Lifer and Nationalist argues that "targeting" dole cheats is a bit of a sop to public opinion and "populism" wherein the real problem lies with the international financiers and big businesses that fiddle tax and fiddle bonuses etc.

He was and is right.

No-one is suggesting that dole cheats or long-term 'dole bums' should be ignored, rather we should work to ensure workers get a fair wage for a job done well, because there is a mentality of "the world owes me a living for ding nothing" in some sections of the community.

However, the millions mis-spent on housing benefit etc. (which should be overhauled) pales into insignificance when compared to the billions swindled by the banksters, financiers, big businessmen and MPs.

Two wrongs do not make a right, but when the people at the top are fiddling expenses and filling their pockets, should we be surprised when the people at the bottom do the same?

The system needs a total overhaul (national revolution - not national reform!) because the people at the top do not only do this illegally, as in the alleged case of Miss Smith, they do it by dancing around the rules and employing legal people to find them the loopholes and a way of breaking the rules whilst staying "within" the law.
The trickle-down effect of corruption is there for all to see.

When this government rails against dole cheats and corruption it comes across as dishonest as when they talk of "citizens' safety" when funding the latest American/Zionist initiative, whilst ignoring street crime, drugs gangs, muggers and the people who put us all at risk on a daily basis.

In the case of the bankers it is doubly galling because not only have these people failed - and still claim mega-buck bonuses - but many of the banks are now all-but government owned, and it is the failed polices and short-term profiteering of those banks which have put hundreds of thousands of people in the real shadow of terror: the terror of losing jobs, losing homes, losing marriages and more!

These are no CIA/Mossad "ghost" terrors: these are real terrors being faced today by tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of workers and small businessmen in the UK.

The American profiteers who made billions and caused the whole "sub-prime" debacle and "credit crunch" may be beyond the reach of the justice system here (being Americans!) but those within its reach are getting... millions of pounds in bonuses!

The dole cheats who are caught are fined. The MPs and bankers who fiddle the system - all "legal" of course! - to line their pockets are... well, they are just allowed to carry on and find more loopholes.

It reminds me of a situation some 15 or so years ago. A police station in a largish English town where I was living was raided because a number of the policemen there were taking drugs. A friend who worked in a pub near the police station had told me a couple of times that the police would regularly go to the pub after work and "smoke pot."

Ah the halcyon (not halogen!) days, when smoking in pubs was legal, and smoking cannabis in public wasn't!!!

You see the problem there, dear reader?

How can a police force full of those illegally taking drugs be expected to tackle crime in a town, especially when a good proportion of the crime is drug fuelled?

The sense of hypocrisy was and still is overpowering!

It is exactly the same sense of hypocrisy I sense today when I read of bankers bonuses, and the allegations against Lords and MPs in Parliament who fiddle the system to make wonga!

It may seem like a pipe dream -- but why the hell should it be? -- but until we overhaul the system and learn to put people in positions of power that put the Common Good before self-enrichment, this constant circus of traitors who sell-out to the bankers and leave our people in perpetual debt-and-taxation will continue evermore.

Certainly the current raft of "opposition" (whether "right" or "left," liberal or conservative, "centrist" or "extremist") seems to be the 'same old, same old' busily filling their pockets right now (aka 'Doing the Tel Aviv Breaststroke') , so are we to think they would be any different once they get a hold of the "expense account" of UK plc? Not on your nelly!

The bankers would just have another raft of career politicians waiting to fill their pockets at the peoples' expense.

Perhaps the answer lies in the old 80s NF position of peoples' representatives - a system of government a bit like corporatism (but in the sense that it shied away from Big Brother stateism, retaining the Small is Beautiful property dispersal of Distributism). They called it Popular Rule, a name I personally never liked because it can sometimes sound like an East German spin on stateism or an American Democrat faux populism.

The NF published a little on it, but I think it was too little (coming at a time of fast change, state repression, split and decline in the NF), and it really should be studied by some think tank or similar to work out the intricacies, nuances and break-down of the facts and figures -- hey, if someone wants to stick me on a wage I'll do it! ;-).

Government would be made up of local community representatives, trades representatives (from car-makers to doctors), experts in their fields etc. -- thus breaking Parliament free of the vice-like grip of lawyers and party stooges.

The "second chamber" would have to be designed in such a way to retain its current role as a control against bad laws or wrong-doing by Parliament. Perhaps it could be made up of experts in their fields, with a smattering of appointees from communities, clergymen and similar that have proven themselves to be excellent servants of the people.

Over both chambers there would need to be a ban on sinecures such as those we currently see ad nauseum from banks, energy providers, big businesses, lobbying groups etc. The wage, the sense of public duty etc. should be enough!

All the representatives would be answerable to the bodies that elect them - whether areas of the country, trade bodies etc. and so if they do not act decently and honestly they could be recalled at any time.

A Parliament that reflects the people, drawing from all communities, all classes, all professions? Parliamentarians that have to behave decently?

Now that would be revolutionary!


Link:
Communists in Ireland fume about Justin Barrett
Corporatism

Big Business Before Pensioners - Thanks Gordon Brown!

While the rains lash down and the weather worsens just imagine the Gas and Electric company bosses sitting around their heated pools (presumably somewhere overseas!) toasting our good health as we pay their inflated prices.

This week we saw where the politicians put their loyalties. Not with the people. Not with the poor. Not with pensioners. But with the company bosses who take MILLIONS in wages, bonuses and stock options.

Oh yes dear reader whilst teachers, coppers, nurses et al are urged to accept below inflation wage rises (in effect pay cuts) whilst the "credit crunch" bites, these fat cats get carte blanche to put their prices up and fleece us out of more money, money so many of us can ill afford as petrol and food prices rocket and wages stagnate.

The Capitalists say that markets will right themselves, the government shouldn't intervene to enforce price capping or a windfall tax. "Communism" they screech as they foam at the mouth.

Isn't it strange how it seems permissible for governments to intervene when the Capitalists, Big Businessmen etc. are in danger - witness the BILLIONS poured into Northern Rock, or the US Tax-Payers TRILLIONS poured into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The fat cats and usurers don't seem to screech "communism" then - when the system bails out their greedy, usurious, rip-off, money-grubbing ways.

It's only when the people ask their government - allegedly their representatives - to intercede on their behalf to rein in a little of the vast profits being grabbed by greedy utility companies that Capitalists start to screech about "Communism."

Oh no dear reader.

"Our" government isn't their to help us. It is there to bail out its big business, banking friends whenever they get in trouble!

It's like when the government says "our" security is No. 1 priority, whenever it brings out its "Al Qaeda" bogeyman. This is an absolute lie.

If our security was a priority they would take the muggers off the streets and stamp out (primarily drug-related) burglary and car theft.

"Security" only matters when it helps Israel, or means BILLIONS given to the spooks or to big businesses for useless ID card schemes.

Any idea that our government, our leaders, our politicians give two figs about us is an absolute farce!

Whether we face wage cuts, a freezing winter or crime on the streets: the politicians DO NOT CARE!

In the 40s we were promised a "land fit for heroes."

Just how long do we have to wait?

Police State Tactics in London

A great piece here from Simon Smith's Nationalist Truth, introducing a piece from the Daily Mail.

Why do the police see the need to cause violence at an anti-war rally?

Can anyone now claim our police aren't politicised?


Link:
Nationalist Truth on the Police State

This weeks newspapers:

Some Bloke Won 'The Apprentice'

Someone else Might Win 'Big Brother'

Tory Leader may Eventually Replace Labour leader.

Welcome to brain-dead UK plc.

CCTV Ignores 97% of Street Crime

And so Inspector Knacker admits that CCTV cameras only help solve 3% of muggings in London.

Right: Not everyone watching us has our best interest at heart!

Now now - he didn't say "they all look the same." These are the 'Post-Macpherson' days officer!

But all joshing aside. This does prove something.

It proves that CCTV has nothing to do with stopping crime.

1. At best CCTV can only record crime - not prevent it.
2. At best CCTV can only displace crime away from the cameras - not prevent it.
3. At best CCTV can make criminals wear disguises, hoods, hats etc.

But we all know that CCTV isn't about stopping crime. A government that claims that "protecting the people" is their first imperative - is lying. Why? Because it fails to protect our people from the very real terror of muggers, drugs gangs, and all manner of anti-social behaviour.

Their first imperative is to protect themselves, to protect their establishment, to protect their power, to protect their whole Masonic infrastructure.

That is what the cameras, the extra police powers etc. etc are all about. It has nothing to do with "terror" nor crime both of which it either indirectly adds to or fails to control.

Wake up White Nationalist and see beyond the lies of the Zionist political parties. Look at the bigger picture!

We are all being watched, listened to, kept on file, ad nauseum.

Our biggest enemy, the biggest crooks, the ones who perpetuate the criminality are the Masonic junta who have ruled this land for hundreds of years.

"Left" and "Right" are just labels of a Masonic regime. Governments change, but the rules continue, and the agenda continues.

Only when we see that the Masonic power structure, the banks, Westminster, the big businesses etc. are the problem and not the solution will we get to any real answers.

And that day, sad to say, is still a long way off because all too many "patriots" are being played by the enemy into putting the interests of Judeo-Masonry first. And in defending "democracy," in defending "human rights," in defending "integration," in defending "Israel's right to defend itself," they in turn are defending the very Masonic establishment that has corralled our people into wage-slavery and usury-servitude for generations.

Here endeth the lesson.

Freedom to Protest?

A Freedom to Protest activist is assaulted and arrested by the police at Downing Street.

Right: An injured Freedom to Protest activist Brian Haw is arrested at Downing Street.

This government has misused and abused the threat from the CIA ghost "Al Qaeda" and the Capitalist-created and alienated 2nd and 3rd generation Muslims, to push through "Patriot Act" style laws to restrict our ancient freedoms.

It seems that Gordon Brown's osmosis from Stalin to Mr. Bean is reversed as we witness the kind of terror-tactics used by the security forces in the latter days of Mr. Blair.

Perhaps Brown's getting tips on dealing with those who want their freedoms from the Chinese Communists?

Whilst on the subject, two asides on the nature of Marxian Police States.

1. The BBC has been full of comments re. Mr. Brown's visit to China. The main stress has been on the need to trade with China as a means to defeat the totalitarians. Funny that the lefties of the 70s who are now in power didn't take the same line with Apartheid-era South Africa; nor for that matter was it their outlook on Iraq, nor is it on Iran. Strange that.

2. One of the younger FC Sprogs was using a FC "Keep Marx Out of the Classroom" pens to do some homework. When I commented favourably I was told "Yeah, all this constant marking and grading of work is a bit much" - I think he'd missed the point! ;-)

Link:
Brian Haw's assault and arrest

Also, how long before State "crackdowns" on "extremist" sites is used against Nationalists:
Crack Down on Radical Web Sites

Where Betrayal Means Profits!

Politics is a dirty business. Why do you think people think of politicians as they do prostitutes or ambulance-chasing solicitors?

Right: A typical politician, Mr. Hain has jettisoned any convictions he once held in order to get his snout in the trough.

Hilaire Belloc and Cecil Chesterton (GKC's brother) wrote all about many decades ago, about how the system works, how it promotes sycophants, how it curbs anyone who may start off wishing to "change things for the better" or who seeks what is right, as opposed to what party whips dictate.

Of course the media has a huge role - much more so even than in their day: who can hope to be a Prime Minister without first attending a private audience with His Smuttiness Rupert Murdoch.

basically between the party structures, the media, the business backers and the Trade Union bosses the system is pretty much sewn up. Throw in the old school tie brigade (how can you ignore it - how many MPs are ex-public school boys as well as trained lawyers?) and you have it.

Left: Obama promises change, yet he has already sidled up to the same old vested interests and is unlikely to rock the boat once in power.

It's not a big "Jewish conspiracy" - though again how can anyone ignore the role of Freemasonry, and on the upper echelons you have groups like the Bilderbergers and the sheer power of international banking cartels - this is a multi-faceted, often conflicting, hydra.

There is a constant internal battle for the upper hand in the constituent parts which is also played out in the left-right dichotomy which we all, pushed on by the media, take part in.

However, this world of turmoil is, (whilst being haphazard and open to all kinds of upsets) pretty much sealed off from the rest of us.

A political class sits at the top table and unless they try and do something good which upsets the media, the banks etc. they will sit there playing out their role. Those with a rebellious edge will have it whittled away especially if they want to feed at the trough and/or further their career.

Look at Peter Hain. A "radical" leftist in the 70s, anti-apartheid activist not afraid to take 'direct action' against South African interests, even sporting events.

You might not agree with his cause (unless you are a lefty spy peering in on FC in order to get some decent political thought away from moribund Marxism!), but at least you could say he believed in something and was prepared to get up of his duff (for American readers!) to achieve his questionable ends.

We can argue whether someone who does something political, no matter how misguided, is preferable to the mindless morons who feed off a diet of Eastenders, The Sun and Big Brother reality TV.

Yet look at Hain today and you see someone mired in New Labour betrayals, an apologist for the war in Iraq, and now someone embroiled in dodgy donations as he sought to win a place in the Labour leadership.

Where is the idealist? Where is the anti-establishment rebel? Where is the direct action agitator?

He's replaced by a bloated, perma-tanned, weaselly, mealy-mouthed, Capitalist apologist, war-mongering, Blair-crony New Labour creature foisted on an "old Labour" electorate in Neath, South Wales.

Right: Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dummer politics is alive and well in the land of the pregnant chad.

The former may not be to our liking as racial nationalists, but how much more preferable (for his honesty if nothing else) than the canape-munching career politician we see today who has sought to excuse every New Labour betrayal and sell-out.

An apologist for sell-out, betrayal of ideals, money-grubbing and a cover-up supremo is never liked, no matter his political hue.

Still, though he was sufficiently disliked by his fellow MPs to flop badly in his bid to be Labour Deputy Leader, he knows that he won't lose his seat. Neath is one of those places where you could stick a red rosette on a monkey and they'd vote him in (no offence to any residents of Hartlepool!); the same could be said of areas like Kensington & Chelsea where a Peugeot 207 in a blue finish could get in for the Tories.

The cattle vote to keep "the other lot out" more than they do for any one or two policies of their preferred candidate.

Even worse, many people (when they can be turned away from Eastenders) now cast their vote for the best-looking politician, or the one who is spun as honest.

Left: If voting changed anything they'd ban it.

Remember Tony Blair? He started an illegal war, espoused Christian values whilst continually passing laws for "gay rights" and much more - yet with his folksy style (tie less, shirt sleeves rolled up, enjoying a mug of tea in the kitchen...) he insisted he was "a straight kind of guy."

Enough idiots believed the spin to vote him in, again and again.

We, as a mass, are cattle. Do we really deserve any better?

The politicians lie, cheat and steal. They indulge in buggery and adultery. They fill their pockets in office via multiple jobs and expense accounts. They walk into nice advisory roles after their stint in parliament.

Yet at each election we all get suckered into the party political charade.

Look at America.

Look at the meaningless slogans.

Look at the empty promises.

Each one promises things like Change. Or Progress. Maybe they promise to be Different.

Those who promise to Conserve and Protect do neither. Those who promise to be Different are shackled to the same vested interests.

Right: Can the land of the pregnant and hanging chad really teach the world about freedom?

The "competition" is closed to those who can raise enough filthy lucre and get enough TV coverage to "appeal" to the voters.

Yet the morons will still vote to "keep the other lot out" like the pathetic lefties in France who voted for Chirac with their pegs on their noses.

The more moronic still will vote for the one with the nicest smile, or the "honest Harry" with the finest quaffed hair.

We all thought Blair was bad, but remember America voted in Bill Clinton! And the defendant of "stained-dress-gate" (aka zippergate) is still "popular."

(I must point out at this conjecture that I'm keeping my vomit bucket close, just in case...)

America is the leader of the Free World (so we're told) yet we get a war-mongering president (personally I think Arabs should have their own Monroe Doctrine and tell America to keep the hell out) who got in via the hanging-chad and the pregnant-chad via an electorate too idiotic to be able to make a small hole in a sheet of paper!!!

Which explains how Hillary Clinton can pull off the most pathetically stage-managed event of the year (to date) when she peeled an onion in her pocket, blinked back the tears brimming in her eyes and appealed to the electorate.

(Damn, there goes my vomit bucket again!)

Lo and behold the voters of New Hampshire gave her a lifeline, as good old Bill looked on with a glint in his eye. He clapped politely as his wife (still!) smiled on at her sheeple.

Spin, lies, TV appearances, a compliant media (via the moguls) and an incredibly gullible public (to the point of incredulity) are all she needed.

Meet the new boss... same as the old.

Plus ca change...

Link:
Order Belloc & Chesterton's book on Westminster politics

The Stuff of Nightmares

Has Private Eye's Justice Cocklecarrot come to life?

So it would seem today as reports of a judge calling for compulsory DNA testing of every person in the UK, and of every visitor to the UK.

What's the whirring noise?

Why! 'Tis George Orwell spinning in his grave!

Meanwhile we hear reports of "scientists" getting permission to create embryos (i.e. unborn living creatures) which are half human and half animal!

These kind of chimeras used to be the stuff of legend, of nightmares... of grandma's spooky stories.

No longer.

We live in a land which is suffering crime at every level, and the Police State cannot stop it.

We live in a land where the sanctity of life is increasingly meaningless as the abortuaries kill millions and the elderly are shoveled into care(less) homes.

Civilisation?

Yes, once upon a time... No longer dear reader, no longer.

Police State: Boasting of Their ANPR Powers

Michael Hoffman, the American revisionist, has a theory called 'revelation of the method' wherein what he's labeled the cryptocracy (New World Order, Neo-Cons, Masonic Elite, Bilderbergers etc. etc.) take pleasure in revealing some of their power, part of their plans to us proles.

He says this allows them to 'lord it over us,' prove how dumb we are, 'rub our noses in it' etc. - in which they take a particular delight.

I must admit I find Hoffman's writings essential reading, even if I don't always agree with what he writes. He does have that cutting edge and ability to see the 'news behind the news.'

It was the other evening watching the BBC News about the "London/Glasgow terror attacks" in which all the usual claptrap about massive Al Qaeda attacks (all very 'power of nightmares' stuff), and the BBC did a special report on how great the police's powers are.

We were shown all the automatic number-plate recognition (ANPR) devices around London and key motorways. The talking head (supposedly a "journalist?") smiled as he revealed how "this technology can't get rolled out fast enough" as he told us about the mobile ANPR devices in marked and unmarked police cars.

Yes dear reader - the police can't investigate who broke into your garage or who stole your bicycle because they are too busy.

These days it seems it's cool to be driving up and down motorways spying on folks! Oh yes, testosterone-filled coppers, brimming with weaponry strut around airports and protect our blessed politicians. How long before the City of London has armed police outside Goldman Sachs and Rothschilds?

Our housing estates will (or have!) become no-go areas where mugging, guns, knives and drugs are the must-have fashionable accessories... People working every hour God sends to pay obscene mortgages for crappy little flats will live behind bars in the hours of darkness (watching Sky TV) as wailing police cars zoom around chasing the ever-elusive/non-existent "Al Qaeda."

I'm starting to feel I'm living in Orwell's 1984 novel. Will they never beat those Eurasians??? We are spied on, folks are locked up for ridiculous social laws, government passes more and more legislation as if to fool us that they are doing anything that will make a difference, and if you dare to say certain things about immigrants, homosexuality etc. then the police will swoop on you for your "hate crimes" and you'll be lined-up in the media alongside paedophiles and wife-beaters.

Are my countrymen really so dumb as to believe all this horse poo about the "critical" security status?

Are we to believe the "Ay-rabs" are the threat? When our government is taken over by an extremist Judeo-Masonic minority and our streets are taken over by gun-toting immigrant drugs gangs?

And so every time one of these attacks is staged, either by a small handful of loons prompted by some genuine grievance or by some security service apparatus ("friend" or "enemy"), we can look forward to the system's media showing us more police powers and gadgetry.

And we can all cheer our approval as they boast of the spying-on and controlling-of us dumb goyim, those of us who aren't too stupefied to move after hours and hours of their bubblegum TV.


Links:
Hoffman's Piece on the Car Bombs
ANPR Provider
ANPR in UK Roll-Out
Is Mass ANPR illegal?
Storing ANPR Data
Intro to ANPR
ANPR "Solves Crimes" BBC Spin

No Explosives in London Car Bomb[s]

From last night's FC e-zine [#2884]:

ENGLAND: CAR BOMBS HAD NO EXPLOSIVES

Early reports state that with no explosives the car bomb[s] in London would
have made a loud bang, but been of no serious damage-making capability.

The fact they did not even ignite speaks of some amateur
terrorist-wannabes, perhaps seeking to give Gordon Brown some kind of
warning and/or to keep Iraq and other issues in the news.

Of course, the idea that agent provocateurs or some secret state agency
[foreign or domestic] could also be at work should not be excluded.


Link:
An interesting insight into the London car bomb[s]:
London Bomb--What a Crock of Crap!!

Car Bomb in London

So a car bomb has been found in Piccadilly.

Let us assume that it was the act of "terrorists" and not some security agency (domestic or foreign) nor some copycat nutter(s), nor some disgruntled ex-employee.

(pictured here: more Terror in Lebanon. As Lebanese civilians faced total war from a nuclear power, the British government stayed silent).

Already the talking heads in the media and government spokesmen (sorry - government spokespeople!) are talking about "the threat we face from international terrorists."

Can I cool things down a bit?

Let me, first of all, add some clarifications?

1. I have regularly commuted to and worked in that area.

2. I have regularly lunched in that area; including the club (Tiger Tiger) outside which the car bomb was placed (though more regularly a greasy-spoon cafe down a side street there).

So this event and place isn't an abstract for me. As when I traveled on the tubes and buses during the days of the London bombings (actual and/or prevented/faked) I do know the places and am one of the people "targeted."

Don't get me wrong - I'm not claiming to be an eternal "victim" like so many people of a certain belief-system, nor to be an expert like so many government ministers... but I at least have some connection with the events, and as such hopefully my opinions won't be viewed in a vacuum.

OK, so that's out of the way, let's get some things straight:

1. More people are killed and injured by immigrant street criminals in our cities each year than by "international terrorists" - but no government minister ever makes a public statement about the threat from immigrants or from multi-culturalism.

2. Those of us who lived through he 1970s and 80s (I'm a survivor! can I have reparations?) remember the IRA mainland bombing campaigns, and whilst the Provisional IRA gave coded warnings to forewarn the authorities, there were still many deaths and injuries. Yet still there didn't seem as much spin, as much Orwellian newspeak or as much hysteria.

3. When, during the IRA campaigns, knee-jerk laws were passed they acted as recruiting sergeants for the Irish Republicans and when innocent Irishmen were arrested and/or mistreated it did nothing to stop the IRA (who now sit in government offices!)

The government ministers and the security analysts out in media land today will say that we must be eternally aware, that more laws are needed, that more CCTV is needed, maybe even that ID cards are essential...

Let us ignore the fact that 'our' part in illegal Zionist wars of aggression and 'our' silence at Zionist wars of aggression in Lebanon etc. has stirred up hatred against the UK; the issue here is multi-culturalism.

If our politicians hadn't allowed millions of non-Europeans to enter this country we would have no antagonised or ostracised 'communities': whether that be the Muslim Asians whom the kosher-Tories whip-up fear of, or the nominally Christian Afro-Caribbeans, or the Albanians etc. all of whom add a heavy percentage to the street crime statistics of our major cities (as will, my crystal ball tells me, the Asiatic gypsies flooding in from Romania and Bulgaria).

Many people say that, unlike the IRA, Al Qaeda is a myth. It is an 'organisation' created and kept in the public conscience by the CIA and others who work governments and media.

(pictured: a child victim of "the coalition" of which, to our shame, Britain is a part - does the family of this dead statistic view her killers as anything but terrorists?)

The fact of the matter is, without mass coloured immigration we would not face any kind of threat (real or imagined or some strange combination of the two); just as without the illegal creation of the State of Israel and the Orwellian constant-wars fought ever since for Israel's benefit (all of which carried out under the beneficent mantle of the United States) with Britain's collusion, we would not face any "terror" threat, unless of course (like 911) some kind of big attack were staged to bring us "on board."

Just as more Britons are killed by immigrant and non-European street criminals each year, more Britons die in Zionist wars every year.

Today a criminal act was prevented.

Please let's get that in perspective.

Don't let the government, media and assorted Zionist and Kosher pressure groups push for more draconian legislation, justify illegal wars or cement the real terrorist liason - ours with the USA and Israel!

If the government really felt a duty to protect us they would clamp down on the muggers and drug gangs and make our streets safe once again.

Mind you, if this government really felt that human life was worth saving:

• They would not engage in unnecessary and unjust wars;
• They would stop the dozens and dozens of thousands of innocent children being ripped apart or poisoned in the womb;
• They would even bring corporate manslaughter charges against the big business fat cat train operators for preventable accidents that take lives.

The idea that this government is interested in saving lives is a farce.

They just love to milk any opportunity (whoever's behind it!) to promote their Zionist "War on Terror."

Link:
Israel destroy another Palestinian Village
Where is the international outcry for this terrorist act?
Who Are the Terrorists?
forum debate

They Are Watching

This week has witnessed some interesting insights into the control freakery and social control which has come into being in Blair's Britain.

As is typical, under a regime which promised more openness and freedom, we've had our ancient rights under fire (even the right to trial by jury and the right to silence).

This week we had:

MPs in Westminster vote that all their doings (even their expense accounts) would be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. These traitors want everyone else to open their books, but exempt themselves!

A top policeman in Hampshire said that the fashion for CCTV everywhere, the rush to grab as much DNA profiling etc., even in sleepy rural towns with little crime, was leading to an Orwellian state.

A parent phoned in one radio show I was listening to, to state that his child was involved in a playground fight (pretty normal fare). Weeks after it had all been sorted in school, the police knocked on their door, took their child, formally warned him and took DNA and fingerprint info from him (alongside druggies and crooks in the police station!).

This last point was part of the much-reported police rush to meet government targets which saw one crime (where a child collected £700 for a charity and didn't hand it in) cleared up as 500+ crimes (because he collected small amounts door-to-door locally).

Remember the report of the child arrested and charged for drawing on pavements with chalk? That was something we used to do as kids on the pavements near our homes, knowing the rain would wash the doodlings or games away.

A police force that just gives crime reference numbers for insurance purposes on break-ins finds the time to arrest small children (and DNA swab them etc.) when it cannot be bothered to track down burglars...

Thus it is that government ministers (who are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act anyway) tell us "crime is down" when it isn't (many simply don't get reported) and that "clear-up rates are up" when they're often not even real crimes!

We are being pushed into an Orwellian state - and 95% of politicians and police have a vested interest in doing so.

They use all the spin tactics we'd expect them to... (only criminals have something to fear!) but despite all the CCTV and DNA profiling have burglaries stopped? Has drug taking gone down? Is gun crime a thing of the past? Is mugging no longer a threat?

The politicians and top policemen (almost all Freemasons to a man!) tend not to be at risk from these crimes, they live in rich areas, free of most crimes.

We are moving towards a Big Brother state. That is why it is so vital for all nationalists and patriots to speak out against ID cards, CCTV everywhere, DNA profiling -- and rather insist that druggies are dealt with, illegal immigrants are deported, mugging is stamped out, and crimes (such as home burglaries) are actually investigated.

Those few steps will make us all feel a lot safer.

How can it be right for more and more police and state powers to be enacted year on year, as street crimes, violence and theft also increase year on year.

If those things actually worked wouldn't we expect the opposite?

Of course, the Freemasons are following an agenda -- but they are also messing about with the symptoms rather than seeking out a cure.

But as Nationalists we should all know that. Destroyed indigenous communities, families with no dads, kids brought up by 6o's liberals, ambivalence to drugs, immorality given the thumbs up by the government - etc. etc.

All the moral frameworks (family, community, church, local bobby etc.) have been decimated by decades of liberalism, immigration and degeneracy.

And they wonder why CCTVs (which they'll still promote!) on every corner will have no effect...

As some fat black bloke once sang: "What a wonderful world!"