Are Swedes Rioting in Sweden?

It seems that "Swedes" have been rioting for 5 days. Yes those laid-back, fun-loving, liberal, social democratic, anti-racist "Swedes" have been burning cars, smashing windows, attacking kindergartens and suchlike!

Who'd have thought "Swedes" would be so vindictive?

I mean I can't imagine this has anything to do with immigration or multi-culti as we were told (back in the 70s and 80s) that the UK was letting in millions of Third World immigrants because "we" had an empire. The last time I looked the Swedish empire only took in a few European countries...

or is it that we were told a huge porky pie to excuse letting in millions of unwanted immigrants and the people rioting in Sweden aren't European or Swedes. That can't be so surely? 

"The BNP Will Never Have Black Members" - Nick Griffin

Today I picked up an old copy of Spearhead (#357), and flicking in through it I found the article in which Nick Griffin stabbed his erstwhile TP comrades in the back in order to assure John Tyndall and others that he was loyal to the BNP... and we all know how that sorry tale ended: Tyndall kicked out, and Nick able to fleece the BNP membership (materially and ideologically) for many years.

Aside from all manner of outright lies and twisted facts ('twas ever thus) one gem sticks out, which was easy to overlook back then in 1998 amidst the countless then-current lies of the bi-partisan party political smear piece.

On writing about the French FN's "black and Arab members" and their "Circle of French National Jews" he adds that all this is "something the BNP will never emulate as long as I have a say in the matter."

What an almighty fib.

He had to oust JT in an acrimoniousness leadership bid before he could let Asians and others join, write for their paper, and be used to show the BNP was... well non-racist, pro-Israeli - it all very much depends which BNP publication you read, at which time, and pivoted to which audience. This all drove the grass roots away, but whilst the shekels rolled in, the BNP leader was as happy as a pig in the proverbial.

All this ideological shifting and pouring salt in the soup, by the bucketload, happened not only whilst Mr Griffin 'had a say,' but under his stewardship as leader.

If only BNP members knew the truth back in '98. Ho hum.

Do Olympics Gold Medals Justify Multi-Culti Nightmare?

The Twits are at it again.

Last night on Twitter 101 varieties of multi-culti were foaming at the mouth and chewing the carpet. What was the focus of their ire? "racists."

They said things around the fact that a "ginger" a "mixed-race" and a "Muslim immigrant" had won golds should silence the "racists."

Really? As I suspected this is just bread and circuses to keep the sheeple focused on meaningless trinkets and not on the financial black hole the Lab-Con governments have put us into.

Our people are taxed to the eyeballs and left without services just to feed an endless hole of never ending debt to internationalist financiers with no loyalty to GB (state or team!) and certainly not to the peoples of these isles. The poor are robbed not only to pay for the Olympics, but (many times worse) to line the pockets of billionaire and trillionaire financiers.

As for those who say a few medals make multi-culti OK; tell that to those who lost their homes, businesses and lives in last year's Summer riots. Tell that to the mostly white victims of mostly coloured muggers. Tell that to the parents of the next innocent kid knifed or shot by a drugs gang. Tell that to a pensioner on a waiting list who's paid taxes all his life, whilst immigrants fresh-in get free healthcare, schooling, housing etc.

A few medals may make some people feel good about the bread and circuses going on in London. But don't be blind to the financial and societal mess that 'GB' has become.

This time next year we will still be paying taxes to line the pockets of internationalist financiers.
This time next year we will still be reading of young kids murdered by drugs gangs.
This time next year we will still be aware of how the streets of cities aren't safe at night for the elderly.
This time next year we will still be reading of the hundreds of thousands of Asians and Africans (still) flooding in.

The dust will gather on the medals - but we (the plebs, the proles, the poor sods who make up the indigenous working class) will still be paying far too high a price for the disastrous policies that favour usury and coloured immigration.

A few medals won't change that.

And that is what the Twatteratti should realise!

The English are: European and Always Have Been

MacCulloch in the House of Treason, Westminster

A TV programme on the English has unearthed a Truth that cannot be denied, even by the mental and emotional retards who repeat parrot fashion that "we are a nation of immigrants."

How God Made the English (presented by Prof Diarmaid MacCulloch) has run on BBC2 on Saturday nights and last week all but showed how pre-Reformation England was unified, one people, one Faith. Since the Reformation heresy multiplied, religious conflict multiplied, and England was ripped apart. MacCulloch admits that "tolerance" and multi-culti (a good thing in his mind) started with the Reformation. Even the established Anglican Church has never been unified, split between Anglo-Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical and High Church variants who are pro or anti women priests, women bishops, gay priests, gay bishops, and the liturgy is very pick n mix.

From unity and stability we have had disunity and chaos, all added to by 20th Century immigration deliberately planned to undermine and wreck even the nominal Christianity left in place.

This week we were shown info on immigration, primarily how the Celts migrated from Europe and how most English are in fact Anglo-Celts (or Britons converted/switched to  Germanic culture and kingdoms in the 4th and 5th Centuries). So it could be argued that England and Englishness is more cultural than racial. Of course this is true, as racially we are all European. The nonsense that "racial discrimination" is invoked when Anne Robinson slags off the Welsh is self-evidently ridiculous. Xenophobia perhaps. Ignorance maybe. But racist? No.

However, after discussing the waves of invaders and migrants from the Saxons to the Vikings, the Normans to the Huguenots, the presenter of the programme made an observation which is absolutely true but which nevertheless has been banished from all school lessons, text books, history programmes, political talk shows, and so on: that all the immigration into England up until circa the 1940s was European!

The English are a European people. Celts, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, Irish, French, Italians... all came. All celebrated their customs, over the years all became English; just as the Welsh, Vikings, Normans etc. who settled in Ireland were all European and became Irish.

The difference in the last 70 or so years is that mass non-European immigration has been allowed to happen, and this has destroyed vast areas of England.

England, since long before the Kingdom of England existed, until just a few decades ago was always European. It was always linked to Europe through its people, its culture, its traditions. It was always racially European.

Now the politicians have wrecked that. They have created a mess in which the English do not know what it means to be English anymore. Many English feel that vast areas, whole cities and towns, are no longer English in any meaningful sense.

What a mess the bunch of traitors in parliament have created! They have wrecked a nation, created a rootless, cultureless, lawless mess. In the process they have sought to wreck the last vestiges of Christianity and now look to uproot marriage. They won't be happy until the raw, bleeding wreckage of England is left for dead.

England was always European. Marriage was always between one man and one woman.

The politicians, in their Lodges (and one might point at the Protocols) have longed for this. The withdrawal from historic Europe, the mercantile exploitation of India and Africa, the false notion that the colonisation of England by the Third World (favoured by Marxists for the vote-factor and Capitalists for the wage-factor) is somehow justified, because (they say!) we have more in common with Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims due to a mercantile empire than our European Christian neighbours.


For our forefathers there was no need to get "hung up" on race any more than marriage, for both were as natural as sunshine and rain. Sadly, we now have a situation where the Emperors Clothes situation is being played out in front of our very eyes, and so we have to reiterate the bleeding obvious.

One of those is that the English people always have been and must always be European, racially, culturally and spiritually.

Muslims Give Antifa Anarchists a Beating in Sweden

Before the usual brain-dead trolls start up, this are not our videos and their editorial content is not ours.

Got that? Has it sunk in? Good. Then we can get on...

These vids show the Antifa getting a beating from the very immigrants they claimed to want an open door policy for.

You see, Mr Antifa, whatever banners you wave, you are still white men. And when that mugger holds a knife to your throat as your girlfriend is raped, all the bleating about multi-culturalism and "smash the fash" is not going to save you.

Sweet dreams!



and without subtitles:

Trevor Phillips: Multi-Culti Bully Boy of a Growing Police State

"Toe the line" is the cry from the promoter of mass coloured immigration, homosexual rights and much else that is bad in 'modern Britain.'

He says that if Christians see that a 'law' does not fit with the morality of Christianity (queer adoption, abortion, homo-rights, euthanasia, usury etc.) then Christians should follow the law of the land, in effect that "we" have to choose between our religion (our heritage, our civilisation, our roots, our forefathers) or the "law of the land" -- the threat being that if we choose the former we somehow become OUTLAWS.

How long before the police knock on doors of those who speak out against queer rights? How long before the police turn up and arrest a Christian being beaten up by homosexuals because he gave out leaflets or held a placard with a Biblical quote?

Next year? Next week? Tomorrow? Think again patriot! These things have already happened.

From the bosses of Westminster's quangos and the Race Lobby to the Masonic police chiefs who enforce Acts of Parliament passed by degenerates and traitors, to the Charity Commissioners who shut down adoption agencies who wouldn't house children with poofs... 1984 and much worse is already starting, and it's all around us.

It is our duty to speak out when we can, make our friends and neighbours aware. We cannot allow what was once dismissed as the "loony left" (Frankfurt School Marxists) to hold sway over public policy without fighting back.

There are plenty of bodies out there fighting back, professionally organised and looking for help. Look them up, join them, give their materials to those interested in your community.

If we lose this fight the enemies of civilisation will not give up the ground they gain. Network, educate yourself, be intelligent and join the resistance however you can.

Link:
Trevor Phillips Says Christians Must Choose

Anti-Racist Liberals Hoisted by their own Police State Petard

Satire is no defence: Lock 'em up.

Liberals and Anti-Racists, egged on by the overpaid (via taxpayers' funds) Race Lobby, often staffed by extreme communist or corrupt money-grubbers, have long called for more Police State powers to target "racists."

These "racists" are often just decent people who are fed up of mass coloured immigration, or whop oppose the gradual take-over of England by millions of non-Europeans. In and of itself there is nothing wrong with that opinion. It is not illegal. It is not hateful. It is certainly not nihilistic or anarchic.

This has not stopped the institutionally anti-white Race Lobby nor the institutionally liberal and corrupt "leaders" of the political, lawyer, police and media classes from conspiring to target those who are opposed to immigration, often painting them as "racists," "fascists," "extremists," "neo-nazis" and so on ad infinitum.

These people, a mixture of posh liberals and Freemasons and (ex) Marxist agitators, have tried to make opposition of multi-culturalism and/or mass coloured immigration (a thing most people would have agreed with a few decades ago) criminal.

So it is with some joy we find out that the anti-racists of the "Red Attitude" Manchester United fanzine have had copies removed by the police and a threat to have the issue destroyed, because they used a KKK image, albeit as a means to attack Liverpool fans who have 'dared' to stand up and defend Luis Suarez. The Liverpool fans don't seem to understand (or rather they do and they don't like it) that in the post-Macpherson Report world, when a coloured person thinks he is the recipient of "racism" it ipso facto (regardless of the facts) becomes a racist crime!

This is of course itself racist, because if I report a crime as racist as a white man, simply because I assume it to be so, the police will probably ignore me or even treat me as a 'white racist' for stirring up trouble.

That the Man Utd fanzine was grabbed from the hands of their supporters outside Old Trafford on the State's ridiculous anti-racist twisted politically correct generalisations has some deliciousness about it. Let the liberals, Marxists and anti-racists moan all they like: they have created this crass stupidity wherein items can be grabbed, editors can be arrested, writers can be jailed and mags/books can be banned - not for obscenity, not for offending public morals, not for promoting terrorism or violence: but merely for going against what the modern-days lords and masters say is correct as regards multi-racism and immigration.

So, let's pretend we are as twisted as those treacherous, commie, anti-white commissars and say, with tongue firmly in cheek:

LOCK 'EM UP! PULP RED ATTITUDE. 

It's the only way to protect the public and democracy!

An Illegal Immigrant and a State Breaking Ancient Laws

He's an ILLEGAL Immigrant. Simples.

The argument over Abu Qatada is all the fault of liberalism and a failed multi-racial immigration policy.

He is an illegal immigrant. He should not be in this country. He should have been turned back on Day One. But like countless (literally!) other illegal immigrants he was allowed in, and immediately gets hand-outs.

He has not (so we are told) broken any laws since his illegal arrival and the state locked him up because his thoughts are deemed dangerous.

So let us analyse this:

• His very presence here is illegal (a costly mistake as he, like others, receives state handouts).
• The state is locking up those it disagrees with, without stating what law they have broken.

Both of those should worry nationalists - because the former means the politicians are traitors, letting in hundreds of thousands of non-Europeans each year (against our wishes), yet when the dangerous ones are spotted they then tweak the law to lock up people on a pretext.

Now I do not support "militant Islam" before the Neo Con trolls start up. I am a White Christian Nationalist. I do not believe in coloured immigration. I believe Europe should be Christian in its entirety (as Belloc said "Europe is the Faith, the Faith is Europe").

However, the fact the the state is locking up Muslims (rather than just stopping the entry of all non-Europeans) means that one day they will be more than capable of doing this to nationalists.

Far fetched? Many/most "terror attacks" are false flag operations. Many "extremist" Muslims are in the pocket of the CIA/Mossad (just as top IRA people were in the pocket of the British state).

All it takes is one false flag op, one paid-idiot to spout crap about "sending 'em home in body bags" and we could easily see nationalists who have spoken out against coloured immigration, multi-culturalism locked up for "hate speech."

That is why nationalists need to be intelligent. By all means oppose Abu Qatada. Oppose his Islamism. Oppose his very presence here. But please do not be (Neo) Conned into supporting an illegal act of government which flies in the face of Magna Carta, the Law and Natural Justice.

If the government had any cajones it would stick him on the first plane home, as it should have done x number of years ago, just as it should with all illegal immigrants.

Illegal = Criminal.

But their liberalism means he stays here, and so they think up new 'powers' for themselves to whisk people off the streets for their thoughts and ideas and bang them up indefinitely.

If a piece from this blog is one day found in the home of some Mossad-paid nutter who shoots or blows up blacks, Muslims, queers or whoever, they could come for me because they will say I am a "hater" and helped "inspire" Mr. Nutter (despite the fact that Third Positionists have always categorically condemned terrorism as morally unacceptable and tactically misjudged). But we all know how the government, media and various pressure groups work.

When the TP has had various centres, in this country and abroad, the Mossad-mouthpieces, media etc. have always parroted phrases such as "terrorist training camps" when they were anything but. A surprise visit would garner more books, families, games of football etc. then even a fish filleting knife. But that doesn't stop the media, the Mossad crowd and others - because they believe a lie oft repeated is a lie believed.

So please do oppose Abu Qatada in your writings, actions and conversations. But do not support the illegal actions of a (Zionist, multi-racist, anti-nationalist) state that could one day be used against law-abiding citizens who disagree with government policy.

Let's not make slaves of ourselves to cover up the ridiculously liberal immigration policy of a failed and treacherous system.

Anti-Racist Group Say Critics of Corruption are "Racist"

Naz Malik - as featured on the Lottery website

Ethnic minority "spokesmen" are starting to learn from extreme Zionists.

When Zionists are caught supporting  mass-murder, caught embezzling funds, caught out being nepotistic etc. they screech "ANTI-SEMITISM" as loud as they can, hoping to smear their opponents and silencing potential critics. Some reporters won't touch such stories for fear of aggro from vested interests, media owners and some advertisers.

Now it seems the "anti-racist" pro-ethnic lobby are copying these antics.

The Welsh media have been reporting on a Swansea-based group called AWEMA (All Wales Ethnic Minority Association), whose leader Naz Malik - it is alleged - has employed family members, inflated all their wages, given himself perks, and paid off his credit card with AWEMA funds. A report is due out any day whose author says he has found a number of very corrupt practises.

AWEMA is funded by the Welsh government - to the tune of £8.5 million a year! That is tax-payers' money (what recession?) used to push an anti-white message. £8.5 million a year to help an ethnic population that must be minimal compared to England or even Scotland. It also has received had outs from the National Lottery. Mr. Malik is also a Labour Party activist (receiving funds from a Labour-run government...)

Yet it can't be corrupt, it can't be money wasted... to think that is just "racist" - so they tell us!

Let us hope the author of the report sues for defamation, as they are stating he is a "racist" for uncovering what could be illegal activities based around finances and bullying.

The ("racist") allegations (as reported by the BBC):

• Naz Malik used "Awema funds in an inappropriate way", including paying off credit card debts worth £9,340
• Mr Malik "has increased his own benefits package without due openness or transparency". This includes Mr Malik's salary being increased to £65,719 without approval from the board
• Mr Malik "has authorised inappropriate payments, expenses and purchases, which may constitute gross misconduct"
• Mr Malik's daughter Tegwen Malik "has been employed, and promoted on a number of occasions, without any internal or external competition". It is alleged her salary increased from £20,469 in January 2008 to £50,052 in August 2011
• Regular claims are made for relatively expensive meals and hotels, including alcoholic drinks
• The treatment of some junior staff was so poor that it contravened their human rights
• Source: Paul Dunn's report for trustees.

Are You For or Against a Corrupt Zionist Regime?

Have a look at this great montage. Again it shows the hypocrisy of "the West" - i.e. the political and media class.

The last time I made a comparison between the (Real) IRA and the Syrian insurrectionists, and the treatment of them by the BBC (chalk and cheese) when they shoot soldiers, I had one or two dullards and/or nonces stirring up quite the hornet's nest on here.

So, just to let you know, I am not an anarchist any more than I am an Islamist (or "democrat") Arab insurrectionist. I know, I know... but you'd be amazed at what trolls, idiots and numpties will read into a post!

Of course - the rioters in Cairo were fighting against a Zionist puppet regime that had acted against the interests of the indigenous people for decades... whereas in England we have... a 'democracy.' Mwah ha ha!

The BBC treated Irish and Syrian armed gangs who shoot soldiers, policemen etc, quite differently; they also treat those who riot against governments controlled by vested interests quite differently.

As always (e.g. when dealing with Libya or Saudi Arabia ruling families, Iran or Israel's nuclear realities, Serbian or American 'war crimes') the BBC twists the news to fit a specifically British State agenda, and to pretend otherwise is ridiculous. As our state is Zionist (i.e. in the pockets of Masonic bankers/financiers and hardline pro-Israel) the litmus test seems to be whether a regime is pro-Israeli or Israel-tolerant. Of course in international diplomacy nothing is so straightforward. France, for example has gone from "bad" to "good" under Sarkozy (I wonder why) from a regime which tended to oppose Zionist wars to one which is far more in favour of them (it is highly questionable that the French people changed that much!)

That some British nationalists (still!) worship the Westminster State and are still following certain paths and herded in certain pens, thanks to years of brainwashing and State propaganda speaks volumes. The blinkers still aren't off. And so we see a "hurrah" for 'plucky' David Cameron who stands up to the Euro Beast... to defend the rights of financiers in the City of London, who in turn show little or no loyalty to the UK (always threatening to leave these shores if taxes are raised, for example)

The plastic patriots who cheered on 'Call me Dave' Cameron used to be the Imperialists, who cheered as Britain planted flags in India, Africa, and even in Calais and Gibraltar (but who would go to war if Spain or France claimed the Isle of Wight). Of course, they were too dumb to realise that eventually the Indians and Africans would return the favour and colonise us - now they want to claim as a right what their political forebears denied the Indians and Africans -- independence, nationalism and their own country run by their own kind.

The jingoism of Empire was in reality a form of multi-culturalism which celebrated money, profits and greed above all else. There was little or no altruism, no seeking what was best for "us" or "them." The British (unlike for example the Spaniards) did not even have the good grace to convert the heathens. Speaking to an Indian (Hindu) on a train recently he told me that most Christians in India are Catholic, with one small area also Methodist (after a Methodist missionary went there). The impact of Anglicanism, given that England ran India for so many years, was minimal indeed. Just imagine (and this is pure conjecture of course and not seen as the be-all and end-all) an India and Pakistan that was converted to a form of Christianity, instead of just bled dry and turned against each other as Britain sought to 'divide and rule' with Muslims and Hindus.

We might even have no nuclear powers playing tit for tat wars with each other, and no Muslim stronghold (used by the CIA and its enemies) to "export terror" as and when needed. Or look at Japan, which was on the verge of becoming Christian thanks to missionaries from Mediterranean lands. It was Dutch and English traders who persuaded the Japanese rulers who weren't Christian (about half) that this was some kind of threat from Portugal or Spain which would then "take over" and so Christians were massacred, crucified en masse, and often mutilated by having their feet cut off. It was the money-men of Amsterdam and London who stopped Japan becoming Christian... imagine the impact in WW2? History may have been so different. It may even have impacted on China, preventing the rise of Communism... who knows?

It was money and profits that drove the British Empire, and it was (as usual!) GK Chesterton who saw the future problems this early globalism would bring. I found this interesting text/review online, about an essay on Patriotism by GKC. It is so good I would urge everyone to read it two or three times and to keep a copy for future reference:

There is, however, another enemy of Patriotism and Nationalism. It is equipped with power and wealth and a good chance of success in practical politics and it is but the disguise of cosmopolitanism. It is Imperialism, or as we would say, 'Globalism'. In Chesterton's opinion the Empire was neither for the benefit nor the glory of the English, it was for their exploitation. We had been put to work, to suffer, to bleed and to die, for the benefit of international banking and trade, that is, 'Globalism', and when we had served our purpose the assets would be stripped and lodged elsewhere. The price of such glory as we might enjoy from seeing the map painted red, was our impoverishment, our deculturation, our mongrelization, our destruction as a Nation. Chesterton presented this succinctly in 'The Flying Inn'(1904) "Did you ever hear the great destiny of Empire? It is in four acts: Victory over barbarians. Employment of barbarians. Alliance with barbarians. Conquest by barbarians. That is the great destiny of Empire."

GK Chesterton saw mass immigration into Britain decades before it happened, whilst the ideological forebears of today's plastic patriots, Westminster State worshippers to  a man, were singing God Save the King, down with the Frenchies/Krauts (delete as applicable) in short, much as most of them still do today!

They sung/sing a hymn to a Queen who has rubber stamped laws on homosexuality, abortion and divorce (and mass immigration/anti-racislism!) that have ripped this country apart. She swore to be a Christian Monarch on her accession to the throne, an oath she swore to God; but just as the wedding oaths sworn by so many, it was meaningless - as their weddings were dissolved by man, might we wonder if her monarchy should be dissolved by man? How can a Christian Monarch pass laws as she has? She even made the architect of the 1967 Abortion Law (which resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent Britons) a Lord!!! How preposterous is that? ...and we have Charles "defender of (multi-)faiths" waiting in the side-lines.

If Elizabeth II had an ounce of decency she would have stepped down as monarch, or stood firm to uphold her oath. This, I believe, is the basic argument of much of the Lawful Rebellion crowd. If the crown is void (a kind of British 'sede vacante' - vacant seat - position if you will) then when we enter the courts controlled by the crown, they have lost the authority to judge us. If we do not recognise the crown as legitimate, having broken the Coronation Oath (as usury, abortion and homosexuality to name but three, are anti-Christian), then it has no right to levy taxes on us -- for its illegal wars, its pro-queer bodies, its abortion-performing structures and for its repayments on usury debts.

But let us return to nationhood. GKC once said that the patriot loves his country, whereas an imperialist wants to invade his neighbours. I said in a recent post that WW2's very basis was flawed given that we were conned into taking part in a war that was for the freedom of Poland, but resulted in handing over the entirety of Poland to one of the very powers that had invaded it in September 1939 (but which bizarrely we did not declare war on!): the USSR.

For me, one of the faults with National Socialist Germany was that it was, at its very core imperialist. The Reich was to expand. Austria was a fascist country with a superb economic basis on which it was building structures for the Common God that were building a socially strong and confident Austria. Even Poland was nationalist and had stood up to Soviet Communism. Today it would be painted by liberals as "fascist." The sad fact is that both these countries were taken over by a Germany whose very basis was imperial growth. It was its imperialism rather than any perceived "fascism" or "socialism" that proved its downfall.

"Chesterton’s distaste for state socialism, his suspicion of monopoly capitalism, and his support for the independence from imperial domination of small nations like Poland..."

from the GK Chesterton Society's conference 2011 blurb

As nationalists, we must be nationalists! This is the basis of this rather meandering post. We must stand up for our own nation. We must not be imperialists, we do not want or need empires. We must realise that we love our nation(s), but that does not mean we must worship the state. We must disassociate worship of the Westminster State from love of nation.

This is a debate that nationalists need to have, especially in light of devolution, a monarch and state that are promoting homosexuality and abortion, the collapse of the Euro and the ongoing take-over of our lands by non-Europeans, which the state is defending to the detriment of our people!

Regardless of the permutations in the arguments that fly back and forth, the one thing that we have to realise above all else is that as nationalists today, the state that rules over us, which has promoted multi-racism, destroyed Christianity, pulled apart the family, promoted illegal Zionist wars, and pushes its twisted propaganda as news on the BBC, is not "ours" - it is not British, English or whatever - it is in the pockets of financiers with no national loyalty, it is bought and paid for by the men who rule the Lodges who wreck our lives, yet it expects our loyalty too??? We'd have to be mad!

That is the British State as it stands, that is why we owe it no loyalty. It, the Queen, her governments and the Lodges behind them all, have betrayed the peoples of these isles on every single imaginable level. The law is not only an ass, but a law that breaks almost every single moral law (from deadening usury, to sterile homosexuality, to the multi-racism that destroys, to the mass death of abortion), has to make us realise that we are living under a regime that has sold us and our children into perpetual slavery, taxation-debt and degeneracy.

That's why, when I see an anarchist bashing a police van in London, whether it is a demo over student loans, big brother or against another war -- despite the fact that he may need a "damn good wash" (copyright 1970s NF) and support more than a few dubious causes -- I see very little difference between those demonstrating against a corrupt, pro-Israeli regime in the pockets of the money-men, who treat the indigenous people like crap; and the demonstrators in Cairo.

The Season of Intolerance

I said "civ-il-is-ation"

Stoopidist thing I heard for a looooong time today was an ITV News reporter outside the Queens Park Rangers (QPR) ground in West London, commenting on both the QPR v Chelsea and the Liverpool v Manchester United matches, and the furore surrounding them in regards to alleged "racism."

The reporter, brim full of white guilt, said it was "The Season of Intolerance."

Pass the sick bucket Mildred.


P.S. It's only football.

P.P.S. Yesterday was Holocaust Memorial Day. I forgot.

Sponsored by the Macpherson Report: Silencing Free Speech the PC Way

This message is brought to you by the Council for Forced Enrichment

Calling all ethnic groups and progressive politicians, pressure groups and their "spokespeople" (proper pc language) out there, especially in medialand.

• Do the figures show that more racial attacks are against the white indigenous people?
• Do the facts show most muggers are of an ethnic persuasion?
• Does immigration bring nothing worthwhile bar more scroungers, NHS tourists, free-school-dinner collectors?

If the buzz word "enrichment" doesn't quell your critics here is the answer!

Please also see our guidelines on the words "bigot," "fascist," "nazi" and "holocaust" especially when discussing planned housing benefit changes or proposals for gay marriage.

NB: These scary words have a diminishing shelf-life so please use them to maximum advantage before their usefulness runs out.

Institutional Anti-White Racism in the Police, Judiciary, Media and Political Classes

This is a superb video which makes most/all of the points raised by FC over the years, including these key issues:

• Loss of ancient rights viz Double Jeopardy (leading to possible State abuse of innocents). 
• Ridiculous subjective nature of "racial" incidents in law in favour of "ethnic minorities" and so discriminatory and hence probably illegal. 
• Media cover-up of racial attacks against whites (meaning an ipso facto racially-biased conspiracy across the media titles/channels).

Something is rotten in this system, and the law, politicians, police and media are involved!

We are the victims of this prejudice and slanted policing, non-reporting of crimes and a badly skewed criminal justice system.

Watch this video. Understand its implications. Tell others. Spread the word.

Discrimination, even against homosexual degenerates, is supposed to be illegal. Yet it is encouraged when it comes to the many white victims of the criminals amongst the guest 'communities' we have in this country.

Spread the word, if for no other reason than to remember the vicious murder of Kriss Donald, the Glaswegian 15 year-old boy tortured, murdered and burnt by Asian thugs. A vicious anti-white murder that the entire media decided we do not need to know about!

The Strathclyde Police admitted to dropping Operation Gadher which had acted against Asian gangs in the area. If it had been left open, this could have saved Kriss's life, but the police feared being labelled "racist" and so shut down the very Operation that could have stopped what is probably the worst racially motivated murder in the UK. The BBC itself admitted to under-reporting Kriss's murder.

These are just two prime examples of institutional political correctness which led to bad decisions which impacted on the crime itself and public knowledge of the crime! Why were these decisions made? Who stands to gain?

It is not illegal to ask these questions. It is not "hatred" to want to stop the murder of white people. It is not "racist" to fight for our streets to be safe from knife or gun crime.

The politicians often tell us we fight (needless and illegal/immoral) wars around the world to "keep the British people safe" and yet we are not safe! Not from "Muslim extremists" in Asia or the Middle East, but from the muggers, drugs gangs and the knife and gun wielding hoodlums that litter the streets of our cities.

Remember a few years back when the then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith took her armed protection officers with her on the streets of South London just to get a take away? Sadly most of us don't have that luxury, yet from their white-flight plush homes (in the case of Smith the luxuriousness of which was helped along by tax-payers' money she conned out of the MP's expenses system, yet miraculously evaded jail), the people who run the media, political machinery, courts and police, tell us continually how immigration has "enriched" us, whilst the rest of us have to take to the streets unprotected from gangs and suchlike.

If the politicians really want our people to be safe, then they should act here (not in Asia!) to stop attacks on people on the streets of London, Manchester, Birmingham etc.

And if they are serious about "stopping racist attacks" then why not come down hard on the many muggings, rapes, stabbings, shootings and other attacks carried out by "ethnic" criminals against indigenous people, whose only fault seems to be their ethnicity/identity.

Or is Stephen Lawrence more important than the many English, Scottish and Welsh victims of racially aggravated crimes (not treated as such by any layer of the establishment)? If so, why?

I believe we are looking at institutional anti-White racism at every level.





Many thanks to GriffinWatch for putting this video on their blog.

Liberals & Socialists Don't Care About White Victims of Racial Attacks or Black Victims of Gangstas

Richard Everitt, long forgotten

So two men have been found guilty of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. Did they do it? I don't know. What I do know is that it would be almost impossible for them to get a "fair trial" given the trial by jury over the years. But leaving that and the huge police operation to spy on them detailed in some of  today's media, the chief victim in all of this, is English justice.

Double jeopardy is a long-established part of the justice system. Or rather it was. The idea was that it stopped a person being tried again and again for the same crime. I like to think of its overturning as the "EU approach" - i.e. if the system doesn't get the result it thinks is right, it goes for trial again, and again... until it gets the result it wants.

This could lead to someone whom the system opposes being tried over and over and over. The English were sensible enough to know that this could lead to tyranny and victimisation. Dumbed down by Eastenders and Fleet Street editorials, the establishment has now destroyed hundreds of years of protection from tyranny.

Dobson was previously tried and the chief witness's evidence collapsed and it was found to be so unreliable.

I do not know if the two men are murderers, but English justice has been hacked to bits. Close on a thousand years of rights and defences against tyranny have been discarded on the say-so of a team who put together the MacPherson Report (MR) - and listening to them in the media, they are the usual White-guilt, White-flight liberals and rich idiots who have probably never lived on a mixed-race estate and who always rip apart our traditions to "make things better."

When overwhelmingly coloured (Ooops, they don't like that term, I'd better say COLOURED) rioters took to the streets of London one of the MR bods wept how blacks were still being mistreated by the police. That's how these idiots work. Criminals riot and it's "oooh. poor criminals." Muggings go on, shootings go on, knifings go on.

Bizarrely enough quite a few of the people killed by black knife and gun carrying hoodlums (as well as the white victims of racist attacks, few of whose names are known by Lord Liberalpants or Quentin Whiteguilt QC) are themselves blacks.

Many blacks in London cry out for help when their sons and brothers are killed by "gangstas" and want the police to act against the "gangstas" yet when they do the white liberals and black political agitators stir it up by calling stop and search a 'racist' modus operandi.

How else do they expect the knives and guns to be taken off the streets? Do they think the "gangstas" will voluntarily hand over their weapons and stop carrying out racial attacks, or murdering black kids, or pushing drugs, or mugging the innocent?

More innocent black teens have been murdered in London by black "gangstas" than by "white racist gangs" yet where are the political agitators, socialist rent-a-mobs and white-flight liberals, Lords and QCs demanding action against the "gangstas?" Is it cos they is black?

Yet if we wonder at these peoples' kid-glove treatment of the gangs that commit the vast majority of gun and knife crime across London (not to mention sell the drugs that create so much misery and cause so much crime, e.g. robbery and muggings), we should be dumbstruck at their treatment of the White victims of racial attacks by coloureds.

They quite frankly do not care. They do not even know their names. Nor the numbers of Whites murdered by non-Whites. Nor the fact that many/most of these crimes are not treated as racial attacks. Nor the fact (see link below) that most victims of racial attacks are WHITE.

As a test I went onto Twitter yesterday and sought out a suitable twit. There was one, a tweet sent between two users, one with 'socialist' in his user-name, twittering about the terrible murder of Stephen Lawrence and hurrah for the guilty verdict.

I asked the sender what about the White victims of racial attacks. despite stating that they campaign on all victims of racial attacks, @markwrightuk88 ("Socialist Party member") could not name a single, solitary White victim of a racial attack, let alone one that he (in all his hideous whiteness) had campaigned for justice for, or campaigned against the coloured criminal murderers.

And that speaks volumes. That is the reality on da streets innit.


Link:
Even Liberals Admit: Most Race Victims are WHITE

Stabbings in London's West End

Consumerism, multi-culturalism, gang culture?

Oxford Street Boxing Day crowds - Whites are a minority

What was behind the stabbings and murder in London's West End which started when "two groups of youths" (media/police code for West Indians, usually) argued in the trainer shop Foot Locker?

A fight over the latest fashion of training shoes? An argument over "respect?" Or a post code gang fight?

What's for sure is that the norms of society are falling apart and our politicians are powerless to stop this kind of nonsense. More liberal, 60s failed dogma wll not solve this mess.

Consumerism, multi-culturalism, gang culture -- all have to go if we are to stop more violence and nihilism, whether it's Summer riots or Boxing Day stabbings.

Who the hell goes shopping with a concealed weapon? It's time to end the chaos.

Link:
Oxford Street Stabbings

Immigration System is Bu##ered

Remember the recent brouhaha over the dodgy illegal immigrant who could stay in the UK?

Let me narrow it down for you - he was a South American of some stripe.

Still not there?

The gent in question owned a cat. It was part of his defence against expulsion. It proved he had a "family life".

Remember now?

Theresa May got into hot water for using him as an example of how pathetic our immigration policy is at the recent Tory Autumn conference (she nicked the facts from UKIP's Nigel Farrage who used the case in a speech to a UKIP conference).

You must recall the illegal immigrant now surely!

What the controlled media and party politicians didn't tell us at the time was that the illegal immigrant who proved his "family life" by the fact he had a cat was a fudge packer! His idea of "family life" is sodomy and buying a cat. Let's hope those two streams don't meet!

And the pc media covered this up, the pc judicial system gave him leave to stay.

How on earth can a sodomite with a cat possibly constitute a "family?" And how on earth can an illegal immigrant stay in the UK because he has a sodomitic boyfriend and a cat???

That's how mad the world is! What a farce.

BBC: Revisionists!

As it is illegal in so many countries to question the holyhoax (unlike the numbers who were massacred/wiped out by the Talmudic Communists), then the BBC must be hoping they don't get jailed for this bit of barefaced chutzpah:

Oh yes FC reader! Didntcha know that sub-Saharan negroes were champion knights in Romano-Celtic Britain.

Haven't you heard of the brave negro warriors who defended Britain from the influx of Saxon heathens?

This is Saturday night fodder for a brain dead generation who think Hitler was the goalkeeper in the 1966 world cup, or that Nelson was the name of the last space shuttle to orbit the earth. Let's not even try anything over 500 years old. (The Council of Trent was the Midlands local authority that started Winterval?)

Come on BBC! A negro as a Arthurian knight? Puuuuurlease!

How the Media Works: "No You Did Not See Blacks Rioting" - Kay Burley on Sky News

Watch this video. Approx 3:25 into it a shop owner says he saw blacks rioting...

Kay Burley steps in. She was not there, but she tells the articulate young man what he actually saw.

Zoiks! Welcome to white guilt land.



Also look out for Ms Burley equate herself with working mums on council estates... ;-) Come on Kay - tell us the name of your au pair/nanny. Tell us what your annual income is!

The sisterhood act is a bit implausible when played out by those who live in their white enclaves, in their million pound homes, whose idea of multi-culti is employing a Filipino au pair and choosing which restaurant to go to.

In closing, Ms Burley did not suffer brick bats and Twitteratti abuse for telling this young man what he actually saw and re-writing the story. I bet David Starkey is so very happy the media is even handed!

An American Take on the Riots and Multi-Culturalism

An American supporter emailed this in, and as she makes a number of pertinent points, from an external viewpoint, i thought it apt to share it with the FC readership:

Hello from South Carolina:

     I've been following the riots in England with a heavy heart because I know that this type of violence is unprecedented in your very civilized country.  What you are experiencing is a national crisis that will repeat itself if many, many things aren't addressed in the UK.

     To begin with, absolutely everything that Dr. David Starkey said was 100% accurate, and the people with common sense in England should suspend their political correctness long enough to comprehend the wisdom of his perceptions.  In the southern states of the US, we have lived with the black race for about 300 years.  We know them well and we know how to get along with many of them.  However, a sizable proportion- albeit a sub-culture "gangsta" group, but a VERY large group nonetheless- is in fact violent, nihilistic, and destructive, just as Dr. Starkey described.  Overall, blacks compose 12% of the population in the US, but commit over 65% of all violent crimes (in the southern US, we have about 30-40% blacks, so our crime statistics are higher).  The number of blacks committing murder is 7-times higher than that of whites in the US.  Just reading about the crimes everyday in the newspaper and seeing the photos of who is committing them is enough to convince every American about which racial group is mostly responsible! (But we can't come right out and say so.  People have been "conditioned" to be "politically correct" and defend the indefensible).

     Of course, there are different classes of blacks, just as there are different classes of whites.  The blacks who can assimilate our culture (our culture is based on European tradition) the best, and who can speak clearly, do the best.  It's that simple.  No one minds the type of black people who conduct themselves in a decent manner, and they do exist (President Obama is an example, but he's half-white and was raised by white grandparents and went to an exclusive white private high school).  As Dr. Starkey observed, the black broadcasters on TV speak clearly in the UK.  There is nothing "racist" about his observations.  He is merely being a Realist.

     It's also true that affluent white kids in the US suburbs (where their parent's moved in "white flight" from the black inner-cities of America) think it's "cool" to copy black rappers.  They mimic them because it IS fashionable right now, although most kids realize how stupid they're being. White kids who drive around with ghetto rap music blasting from their vehicles are called "wiggers."  These same kids, however, usually don't have any close black friends, even though they may play on the same football team.  Ours is still a very segregated society and always will be. 

     In my son's integrated public school, the black kids lag far behind academically and consistently score lower on standardized tests.  Poor performance in school leads to limited educational advancement (and a high drop-out rate), which leads to poor job prospects.  This is essentially why blacks are always at the bottom of the socio-economic heap.  They really need lots of special attention to keep up in school, and this is too expensive a prospect for most school systems.  My son, and most of his friends, are in Honors classes at school and only see blacks in the hallway and lunchroom, so his school is really "segregated," as are churches and social groups in America, for the most part.  There are neighborhoods in every city that white people dare not go into, for fear of being robbed (or worse).  The hostility is always just under the surface.  Washington DC, Baltimore, Detroit, and Atlanta are four cities with large black populations are all four are extremely dangerous places to live- in certain neighborhoods, that is.  One has to know where to go and not go. Where there are blacks, there's crime, and the outstanding members of the black community (like Bill Cosby, whose son was murdered by another black in Los Angeles when his car broke down) have not been able to do anything about it.  It's really frightening.

     We imported blacks to work on our plantations (we even fought a war over them), but I see no reason why you would allow them to immigrate to your country!  The powers-that-be in the UK probably bought into the "diversity" and "strength in multi-culturalism" myths and now you are seeing what you've done to your society.  England will never be the same, believe me.  Blacks are notorious for setting fires to things after they've committed a crime, and so I knew that the majestic buildings that were burned down, were destroyed by the immigrants from Africa/Jamaica, etc. (For example, a black male at Auburn University murdered a young, beautiful coed for no reason, then set her car on fire in the middle of campus). True Englishmen would have more respect for their country and culture!  What little contributions blacks have made in athletics and music (if you call rap music, "music", which I don't) does not outweigh all their negatives.  They've made absolutely zero contributions to England's literature, architecture, and industry.  Nor have any of their ancestors fought in any of Britain's wars.  They probably moved to England to take advantage of your generous welfare state, if I had to guess.  Now you really have a problem, for blacks are a problem on every continent on which they live... including Africa, where their inhumanity to each other is mind-blowing.

     Once England sees her tourism money dry up because people are afraid to visit, more drastic measures will be taken to stop the black culture from pulling your country down to their level.  My advice is to get extremely tough with them. Better yet, deport the criminals!  Good luck. 

Sincerely,

Janie B.

The Response to the Riots: Time for Plain Speaking, not Platitudes

The likes of David Starkey and Peter Hitchens are, pretty much, hitting the nail on the head when it comes to the recent riots.

What's interesting is that the violence started with the death of a reputed gangsta. He had an illegal gun. His uncle was a drug and gun terrorist from Manchester (source) who was linked in with violent communist groups, involved in the supply of hard drugs in Manchester and the death of gangland opponents (i.e. drug supply rivals).

Right: The gangstas and ASBOs have free-rein, whilst the police crackdown on genuine protest. Meanwhile the law-abiding majority are made to feel like criminals as CCTV watches our every move and our ancient rights are curtailed. Question immigration or homosexuality and you might get that dawn knock on the door from the Stasi who fail to investigate most home robberies.

BBC Radio 4's morning news programme 'Today' showed that the Socialist Workers Party was in Tottenham stirring up the black rioters via a demo with a loud-hailer. So again we have a Communist link which most of the media, the police and the "experts" have ignored.

This coming together of the gangsta culture and the Communists seems to breed a sort of violence in which everything is up for grabs, with gangstas joined by whiggers, in turn joined by anyone who wants a free-for-all: the kind of ne'erdowells of all kinds who feel the world owes them a living (regularly seen on SWP demos moaning about the Tories whilst living a comfortable life).

The liberals that infest the BBC like the offspring of 1968 that they invariably are (like their counterparts in politics) decry anyone who points at anything like the truth. They have covered up the gangsta culture for years, the endemic crime on council estates where people live in fear, the iron grills that cover windows in London, even in posh areas, for fear of the "feral rats" who see anyone else's property as their own, by right.

This has nothing to do with Social Justice. If it were, people would be organised to that end, fighting for Distributism, seeking to be a part of society, holding up our traditional culture, beliefs and ideals as a beacon for all who want to take part and improve.

Of course this is where David Starkey is right. The gangsta culture is totally alien. It is un-European. It seeks to smash all things that stand in their way to rule the streets with fear and carve up cities for their drugs supply and obscene profits. This people grasp huge profits from drugs crime with both hands rather than work. They gun down anyone who dare stands up to them and will organise a riot if one of their drug overlords is taken out by the police.

Unlike those who seek genuine Social Justice, these people hate England, Europe, Christianity and all forms of decency. Their snarled nihilism is therefore so easily egged on by the kind of "anti-fascists" as organised the Manchester gangs or who egged on the Tottenham gangs. White or black, Asian or Jewish, rich or poor (but invariably well-off), these kind of Communist miscreants see the gangstas as the perfect army for their beliefs.

For years the streets of London and Manchester have been ruled by the gun & drugs crimes and the police have been ineffective. As ineffective as they were when the riots began, because they either (as is usual) go softly, softly and let the gangstas rule the roost (the head anti-fascist gangsta in Manchester boasted on TV, to Donal McIntyre, that they had more guns than the police) or they (very rarely) clamp down hard and then the gangstas and reds move in to stir up "da community" and the bricks and petrol bombs fly.

How can law and order exist in these circumstances? Answer: it can't. It hasn't.

The first job of any government is to keep its own people safe, and yet from the very advent of the failed multi-culti experiment the streets of our cities have not been safe. Remember the NF march in Lewisham in 1977? They had a banner showing a coloured man mugging an English old lady accompanied with the statistics that proved this happened in the vast majority of cases. And yet the police ordered the NF to obscure/redact the profile of the mugger, in an early example of political correctness. As the anti-mugging march progressed it came under a vicious attack from the early gangstas - who had been whipped up and organised by the usual Communist groups.

So as you can see, little has changed.

The state has orchestrated a situation where the streets are not safe. The police on the street must loathe this because they have been emasculated, yet the top cops love it because it has enabled them to grab more and more police state powers, invariably used against "soft targets" such as the English people who sought to defend their communities in Enfield and Eltham. Whilst knife and sword wielding Asians in Dalston and Southall were lauded as heroes by the media and left alone by the police, the Whites were decried as extremists and treated to heavy-handed tactics by the police. Funnily enough the same police refuse to use such tactics in places such as Tottenham and Hackney.

As I said, the first job of the government is to keep the people safe.

They use this as an excuse to start meaningless, unwanted and unneeded foreign wars that are expensive, kill many (our soldiers and foreigners) and simply result in making us an international swear-word.

Yet whilst espousing the safety of the "British people" in starting legally questionable wars, they leave those of us actually on those streets (i.e. not in their rich enclaves and protected by gun-carrying police -- remember ex-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith getting police protection to buy a kebab in London in the afternoon?) at the whims of the gangstas. The little old ladies on estates cower in their homes whilst the "feral rats" run the streets, damage cars, attack passers-by and so on ad nauseum.

The little old lady might phone the police and they may turn up 40 minutes later. Even if the "feral rats" are still there they will be pretty powerless to act. In the rare event of arresting one of them, he will be bailed and back out to make the little old ladies' life a misery (the reason why so many people don't report the "low level" Asbo-style crimes on estates and politicians celebrate that "crime is down" - what idiots!).

If the "feral rats" attack someones car and rob someones house, the population need only wait for the police to show up, some hours later, to give the victim a crime reference number for insurance purposes. Rest assured the crime will rarely be investigated as the police rush off to deal with another crime that happened 4 hours ago.

The system is broken. The criminal justice system is a joke. The police are powerless to act or seen as a joke. The politicians have created a multi-culti nightmare in which the gangstas hold sway. Traditional values such as marriage, Christianity, patriotism and so on are sneered at by the types who run the BBC, which trickles down via the Communist groups and finds resonance in the gangstas (who nlisten to the rap produced by the big labels and pumped out on the BBC).

Peter Hitchens today (source) makes some salient points on this and related matters:

Take our Prime Minister, who is once again defrauding far too many people. He uses his expensive voice, his expensive clothes, his well-learned tone of public-school command, to give the impression of being an effective and decisive  person. But it is all false. He has  no real idea of what to do. He  thinks the actual solutions to the problem are ‘fascist’. Deep down,  he still wants to ‘understand’ the hoodies.
Say to him that naughty children should be smacked at home and caned in school, that the police (and responsible adults) should be free to wallop louts and vandals caught in the act, that the police should return to preventive foot patrols, that prisons should be austere places of hard work, plain food and discipline without TV sets or semi-licit drugs, and that wrongdoers should be sent to them when they first take to crime, not when they are already habitual crooks, and he will throw up his well-tailored arms in horror at your barbarity.
Say to him that divorce should be made very difficult and that the state should be energetically in favour of stable, married families with fathers (and cease forthwith to subsidise families without fathers) and he will smirk patronisingly and regard you as a pitiable lunatic.
Say to him that mass immigration should be stopped and reversed, and that those who refuse any of the huge number of jobs which are then available should be denied benefits of any kind, and he will gibber in shock.

Most people, outside the miasma of the liberal-left and the banking-right, understand this as a fact of life. Undermining marriage, Christianity, abhorrence of drugs, and our white, English communities has resulted in a mess which only those with enough money can escape (how fitting that most politicians had fled abroad when the riots kicked off).

The politicians cannot stop this, because to do so will be to admit that their ideals of the last 50 or so years have been totally wrong. They instead snort coke, fiddle expenses, and cherish their gilt-edged pensions (the kind police, teachers and nurses will no longer get!) whilst  they continue to betray us for their own political ends.

Some will call for more "help" for the multi-culti areas, some will call for water cannons, plastic bullets and more CCTV. Both will fail:

• Help for multi-culti areas will mean poor white areas will be ignored again (something they should be used to!), will mean more pc agendas sucking up the money to confirm the chip-on-shoulder views of the gangstas, more organised crime moving in to cream off the grants. Sure some "projects" may be built, only to be burnt down the next time a gun-tottin' gangsta is shot.
• More police state powers will mean the criminality, broken home, multi culti nightmare carries on, but the police will become more loathed by the gangsta generation, so when violence breaks out it will be more extreme (the police know the gangstas have guns). Meanwhile white communities will face the full force of police state powers for the most minor infringement. CCTV meanwhile will prove useless and merely mean more state control of the law-abiding majority.

We need, as a society, to break free from the stranglehold of the pc brigade, the kind of organised haters who scream abuse when someone like David Starkey dares to get anywhere near the truth. Robert Peston, the chum of the Murdoch-circle who spins his output (see recent Private Eye mags) is a clear example. Despite working for the BBC, Peston poured his bile on Starkey, and said he should be "ignored." Many other rent-a-gobs (e.g. Piers "Morgan" Moron) dived in to pour their abuse on Starkey.

That's right Mr. Media. Run off to your 98% white enclave. Mix with your elite chums - those who loot society every day via their offshore accounting, those who mug society every day via foisting their multi-cult opinions as "the norm". Those who twist the news, spinning against anyone who dares to speak the truth or offer a genuine alternative to the mess we see around us. You know nothing of the white old lady trapped on an estate surrounded by gangsta criminals!

Despite the wishes of the media elite, we should be free to openly discuss:

• The failure of immigration and multi-culti/multi-racism.
• The failure of widespread divorce, single mothers and failing families.
• The failure of drugs policy and the harm that both soft and hard drugs do.
• The role of Communist ("anti fascist") groups in promoting violence.
• The need to promote traditional values - of Faith, Family, Nation.
• The need to think seriously about resettling offspring of immigrants.
• The need to make schools places of learning (using carrot and stick).

This society is failing (has failed?). Police watch as people's homes and businesses are burnt. Gangstas think they rule the streets. Vast areas are no longer English in any meaningful way. The family is all but destroyed in some areas. Too many think drugs are fine and dandy. Too many think the world owes them a living.

In reality only Faith, Family, Nation can save England. Unfortunately too many vested interests cannot allow that to happen and so the downward spiral, in one form or another, will continue.

Meanwhile we can all watch in horror as the Euro and Dollar plunge from crisis to crisis and take the majority of hard-working, tax-paying, mortgage-endebted people of England into another abyss.

England, 2011. It's like the old Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times."








P.S. In today's Mail on Sunday there is a report on a memorial in East London to victims of the Blitz, in the shape of a Dove of Peace which has been attacked and written on by locals from the "ethnically diverse" area "which some think may be racially motivated." Ah! Yet another example of the way immigration has made an area of London as English as a chapati. The Police say they "did receive reports" of the "antisocial behaviour" but - and this may surprise you dear reader - no-one has been arrested despite names and "Asian gang tags" being put on the monument. Instead a fence has gone up (welcome to gulag London) which the gangs tried to cut through with bolt cutters. Such is the proud tradition of tolerance in multi-culti London. Welcome to your future people of Dorset, Shropshire and Cumbria! You can run but you can't hide...