 |
| Degenerate Modern: Ruth Davidson - Tory & Homosexual. |
 |
| Martin Creed -- "Work No. 1023" |
 |
| Gary Hume -- "Capital" |
 |
| Ruth McKenzie of the "Cultural Olympiad" - Degenerate Modern? |
"Militant secularists have taken our tradition of tolerance and whittled it down to something quite different: toleration for a narrow spectrum of liberal-approved beliefs. Anyone who falls outside that spectrum runs the risk of being demonised. ."
~ Daily Telegraph editorial,
18/09/2010
"The direct result of liberalism is anarchy or tyranny. Anarchy results from liberalism as a consequence derives from a principle. This is obvious."
A. Phillipe C.SS.R.,
Christ King of Nations, 1926.
(Translation from French original text).
A good friend, whose integrity and honesty are well regarded throughout the wider nationalist cause sent me this, and I think it is of interest to those within the BNP (who are kept in the dark) and those who seek to oppose the liberalisation and (dare I say it?) Zionification of the "nationalist movement" of which the BNP is a part:
I was reading a book the other day by an author - Carol Robinson I think her name is (no, I'm not lazy, I don't have the book to hand) - who can only be described as a Christian Sociologist.
She'd probably be horrified by that expression, because in part she tears into sociologists with their inbred materialism.
Anyway, I just reached a part in which she deals with agony aunts. She spares little ire for them, and especially the liberal wishy-washy way in which 'everything is right.'
Of course today (the book was published circa 1991, and I think most of her material was written some decades earlier) most of us will recognise this as the modernist mantra of "choice."
Oh yes. Consumer choice is all the rage. 1001 varieties of crap. We are told we have a choice in where to school our kids. We're told we have a choice in where to have our operations... and, of course, there's the choice we have in where to put an 'X' every four years.
And what a lot of horse poo it all is.
Education standards fall. Schools turn our kids into brain dead morons or materialist junkies. We are lucky to be operated on at all. And as for democracy... we get to choose between one lot of Freemasons over another in this land of Tweedledum and Tweedledummer politics.
In the car today I heard some expert being interviewed. This daft bint was a doctor (stone the crows!) and not only that, but she was just made a key advisor to the government... God help us!
She was advocating sex education for three year olds. She was praising books for pre-teens with some pretty graphic material in them.
But even this pornographer to the (once, supposedly) innocents, carried on the mantra of "choice."
It went something like:
"Handle it in your own way. Some are uncomfortable in talking to their young children about such things... but if you can, that's great... blah blah."
These bastards drag us, our families, our children, our society down into the mire - yet all the time they carry on their liberal mantra of "choice."
How many of us would like the choice to live in a White, Christian society? Where the elderly are treated with respect, where marriage is upheld and supported, where crime is stamped upon, where usury is illegal, where the rights of the citizen to live free from fear, intimidation and obsessive taxation are seen as normal?
Where are these choices?
Instead all we get is the crap spouted by liberals.
How many times have you seen an Agony Aunt in a newspaper reply to some sad, confused young kid taken in by faggot propaganda that he should "experiment and see what feels comfortable" and so on?
These people, who think they can advise us - and certainly advise a government (which has passed so many laws in favour of faggotry that even the Church of England has reported that it will soon be illegal for Anglicans to openly question the morality of homosexuality) - have the morals of a stray dog.
There is little wonder that the roots of the Agony Aunts can be discovered amongst a certain people, and that the psychologist trade does best in the "internationalist" areas such as New York and Los Angeles.
People whose lives are messed up, who cannot find love, who are lost in a haze of drugs, who may not even know of a stable family life, who understand nothing of their history, whose only knowledge of worth is how much they earn/steal a month... turn to these materialist, liberal waffling "advisors."
Oh yes... and the rest of the brain dead herd look up to the "celebrities" who spend so much of their time in and out or 'rehab' and on and off the psychiatrist's couch.
What a truly vacuous world we live in, where man is told to worship at the altar of "Choice" (kill your unborn or child or let him/her live - it's your choice) and as long as you do not take a moral stand, as long as you do not rock the boat, as long as you do not dare to gainsay this liberal religion, then you can get by.
And that my friends is where they get us. If you do all that is right by you and your family, yet keep it purely within your four walls, then you are as guilty as the Agony Aunts, Psychiatrists, Politicians and the rest of the choice worshippers: because you are saying whilst morality, normality, justice and so on will be observed and promoted at home and amongst ourselves, we'll abide by "choice" and let our friends, relatives, neighbours, workmates etc. choose what's best for them.
We become guilty by omission.
We're saying that our way is just another "choice" in a myriad of "valid options" or (sick bucket to hand oh brave reader) "lifestyle choices."
It's not popular to say it, but there is right and wrong.
If we fail to speak out against immigration, against homosexuality, against Zionism, against muggers and rapists, against burglars and liars, against abortion, against Communism and Capitalism... then we play into the hands of the liberal enemy.
I am not suggesting for one moment that we turn into raving loons, foaming at the mouth and shouting at passing cars as we do the weekend shopping; but do not let situations pass you by to stand up for what is right.
Do it sensibly. Do it in a calm, measured way. Do it by means of an argument that suits the situation. Learn facts and know your onions before engaging a subject.
You'll be surprised once you broach a subject, or if someone talks to you in work, on the train, at the school gates, in the pub, at the post office, at sports practice or matches... wherever that if you push the correct line they will appreciate it.
They may not agree. They may even argue back... but having someone actually make a stand and not come out with the liberal mantra will make them think.
If they are one of our enemies, it will remind them that there are people out there who do not swallow their lies and propaganda. If they are supportive, it will give them courage to make a stand too - and it will have a knock on effect.
Most people are sick of immigration. Most people are fed up of the homosexual agenda. Most people are critical of Israel. Most people hate the banks. Most people are wary of police powers and ID cards... and so on. But most people are afraid too.
They are conned into being afraid.
They are conned by the "choice" argument, so they either think their opinions are old fashioned, or they fear to speak to others about any number of issues.
So the next time (as has happened to me in each of the following examples) someone at a rugby match moans about the amount of immigrants in Manchester; or someone in the Post Office complains of all the queers on TV; or someone in the street talks about the banking rip-off... engage that person in conversation. Give them some examples to go away with.
The next time they see you they won't be afraid to talk about it again.
I met a comrade (for the first time) recently who has gone on to be a huge help with various initiatives.
He got involved in the last year or so after his mother overheard another Comrade talking in the Post Office about Freemasonry. She knew her son was interested in things she knew little about (the Bilderbergers, the New World Order etc.) and so after a quiet word, put the two of them together... and that was how just one person was put on the straight and narrow.
We all know that leaflets and stickers have their place and certainly still bring in supporters... but the old fashioned word of mouth can do a lot more, because how many people in this day and age take the time to read another leaflet in amongst the reams of junk mail? Or how many people driving to and from work see a sticker in the street?
Yet that one, albeit small, conversation just touching on some ill or other, could be enough to get them thinking.
Try it...
Don't let the values we hold dear die on your doorstep.
Don't let the golden calf of "choice" batter you into submission.
I think that Liberalism is a disease.
It wasn't always so: or at least not universally so.
In days gone by (read this in sepia tones) the liberals included a radical element, that sought to offer an alternative to the landed gentry, and thus offer some basic freedoms to the people.
Thus (before he saw through the charade and wrote his fascinating book The Party System - available from FC) we see Hilaire Belloc, the well-known Distributist author, Christian Social Teaching propagator and patriot, as a Liberal MP.
I suppose you might compare the situation 100 years ago with the early Labour Party which did contain some patriotic genuine anti-collectivist "socialists" who were sickened by the social injustice of Capitalism.
Such a thing would be unthinkable today as (socialists as well as) liberals (both the party political type and the other) are more likely to be found carrying banners for homosexual rights, free narcotics usage, abortion on demand and countless other policies of great detriment to the individual, the family, the community, the nation and (to use the old fashioned term so out of favour today) Christendom as a whole.
But do not, oh faithful and true reader, be fooled into thinking that liberalism is a cancer that dwells solely in the ranks of the Liberals Democrats and sister parties across the world.
Tut tut.
Were that it were so.
We might have some kind of self-contained asylum. We might point at liberals through the bars and laugh at their nonsensical gibberings and sudden anarchic movements of limb - as the monied idle rich used to tour Bedlam 150 years ago in some kind of morbid fascination.
Oh look at Menzies Campbell tweaking the straps on Charlie Kennedy's straight jacket! Oh yes. Hours of fun.
No, oh fellow beacon of fidelity in these tiresome and treacherous times, sadly the liberal canker has entered the entire body politic to some degree or another.
We have seen this in recent times with the Labour and Tory Parties moving evermore to the quagmire of the Centre Ground and the ejection of ideology in favour of Presentation Politics.
Yes yes... I know Bill Clinton was a philandering degenerate who could barely keep his pecker under wraps - but didn't he have lovely well coiffured hair?
OK. I'm being the ultimate pedant, but you understand what I mean. How often have you heard some brain dead moron say about (as just one example) Blair:
