Chris Beverley Sacked, Simon Darby Back - Latest from (Anti?) Zionist BNP

There has been a lot of "chatter" on the internet - in the blogosphere and forums (or fora!) - about the sacking of Chris Beverley, the BNP's Yorkshire and Humberside Regional Organiser.

Right: You will wait in vain for a similar poster to this one (which could have been produced in Israel!) warning of the danger of Judaism or Race-Mixing from the Nu-BNP or EDL.

Outwardly at least this seems like another nail in the coffin of the BNP, at least in its reputation of being nationalist, or rather, holding any last vestiges of nationalism in its make-up, for Mr. Beverley always seemed a very decent and honourable nationalist.

The rumour mill has started up over the BNP's choice as his replacement, with sordid stories of explicit sexual behaviour carried out in the public domain.

The sad thing is that some people hope or think the BNP will replace the Wesminster corrupt old gang of politicians, yet before it has a sniff of real power it is caught up in financial "mismanagement," pecadillos that would make a Sunday tabloid editor blush and much more besides.

It is many years since I saw through the lies of the type of people who now lead the BNP. Remember how Martin Wingfield and the "Flag NF" were the worst enemy? - reactionary Tories and State agents to a man - then their leaders were on the BNP gravy train. Or remember how Pat Harrington and Third Way were the worst enemy? - sell outs to Zionists and homosexuals - then their leader was on the BNP gravy train.

Funniest of all is how some ex-BNP people quit and formed the "British Freedom Party." On the British Democracy Forum recently a Griffinite was slagging them off for being degenerates because some of them are known homosexuals.

OK. Yet at the same time he was defending the homo/bi-sexual antics of a BNP employee, whilst failing to recognise the "degenerate homosexuals" in the BFP were, until very recently, activists and members (I think even local organisers?) of the BNP! It seems degenerates are OK in the BNP, but become human garbage once they quit.

The hollow nature of his moral outrage was lost on the poor soul. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Meanwhile, a familiar figure was wheeled out on the 26th to be the official spokesman of the BNP (despite various announcements that he had resigned etc.) and it's our old friend 5IMon Darby whose dodgy background has been detailed on this site before now.

Funnily enough the (ex?) deputy leader and (ex?) media spokesman for the BNP was on the Daily Politics show on the BBC seeking to defend the indefensible. If you have the BBC i-player facility (i.e. you're in the UK and have the internet) watch the Daily Politics from the 26th - it's near the end of the programme.

The matter of the BNP's dodgy accounts comes up, of course. Again rumours are rife on the net that the BBC's Panorama programme are putting together a programme that will detail alleged corruption and theft in the upper echelons of the BNP.

Smirking away in the background on the show was Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP who beat Nick Griffin when he unwisely parachuted himself into the Barking constituency. She sat there pleased as punch, no-one bothering to bring up her dodgy past in at best messing-up and allowing a paedophile scandal in a childrens' home to go on for years, or as some allege covering-up the paedophile scandal because of the damage it would do to the local Labour Party, her as the then council leader and the Labour Party as a whole.

Funnily enough, as Ms. Hodge is purported to have Jewish ancestry, one of the funniest squirm moments for 5IMon Darby was when he was asked why the BNP was denouncing the EDL as "Zionist."

Why so funny? Well, as when the civic-nationalist BNP condemn other groups for being civic-nationalist (the BNP have promoted race-mixing and "black Britons" at various places and in their official media - printed and online), similarly the BNP which has courted Jewish votes in London, played up its anti-Muslim credentials to Israeli media outlets, and generally played an (at best!) ambivalent role when it comes to Zionism and the "Jewish community" in the UK, is now seeking to condemn the English Defence League as "Zionist."

Now I agree with the BNP, the EDL is Zionist, but when it comes to the BNP and the EDL on matters of race, homosexuality and Zionism we are talking degrees of difference rather than outright opposition.

For many years the BNP has been deliberately ambivalent and two-faced on these matters, wishing to have their cake and eat it. One might even argue that at least the EDL is open and honest about their homosexual, Jewish and coloured supporters, whereas the BNP had/has them and certainly wanted them (and their money), flaunted it to an enemy media and pretended otherwise to certain constituent supporters.

The BNP were following a Zionist agenda for many years (Israel was a 'democracy,' Islam was the main/only enemy, Sikhs/Hindus were allies, non-Muslim Africans were welcome and so on), now the EDL has picked up that poison chalice and run with it.

The problem the BNP now have is to its own supporters it has to paint the EDL as non-nationalist because of this, but to a media that it tried to neutralise by playing up its own Israel-friendly stance it looks two-faced for the BNP to now condemn the EDL as "Zionist."

With all these financial and political problems, the BNP still 'smells' like a wrong 'un when hitherto 'good eggs' like Chris Beverley are pushed out of their roles (the BNP is already spinning that he walked, but he has made it clear he did not) to replace him with someone with (at best!) a degenerate, pornographic link that could be highly embarrassing, meanwhile we get the 5IMon Darby affair with the "is he/isn't he" a BNP leader...

Some nationalists think the BNP must fall, if a decent nationalist movement is to rise in its place (one might argue that the system has backed the EDL for this very purpose!), whereas others think that if the BNP falls, nationalism itself will be knocked for six -- with everyone being tarred by the same brush of corruption, nepotism, degeneracy and policy betrayal that is turning away both activists and voters from the BNP.

One thing is certain, a game is being played out here, though the outcome is still far from certain.

Harrington Backs Coloured Candidate that Beats the BNP

Why should Harrington's "NLP" back a coloured black independent candidate in Dagenham - who then goes on to beat the BNP candidate?

Right: This gent isn't the candidate in question, but is he picking the substance that the NLP took in order to back a non-European in a Dagenham by-election?

The article below is written, we believe, by an ex-BNP official who is seeking to expose the creeping liberalisation of the BNP as well as the out-and-out cronyism of the "most Zionist" party.

FC readers will remember that the BNP leader backed the leader of Third Way/NLP, one Patrick Harrington, over his own BNP officials and activists in the Solidarity debacle.

It's interesting to know that this backing is paid back in kind by supporting a non-White candidate standing against the BNP!

Has the BNP leadership annoyed another (ex) ally?

With friends like these...


Link:
Black independent candidate gets Harrington's backing

Liberal and Zionist: It's the BNP

A good friend, whose integrity and honesty are well regarded throughout the wider nationalist cause sent me this, and I think it is of interest to those within the BNP (who are kept in the dark) and those who seek to oppose the liberalisation and (dare I say it?) Zionification of the "nationalist movement" of which the BNP is a part:

One of my sources within the BNP writes:

"Griffin seems to be getting rid of his old Executive Committee, and forming a new invisible one, incorporating;

Arthur Kemp; Tony Lecomber; Patrick Harrington; Simon Darby; Lee Barnes. This inner circle is nothing to do with the EC, but the real people that Griffin shares ideas with. As the EC can get rid of the Party Chairman by a two thirds majority if they wish, rumour has it that Griffin is moving to abolish the EC.

"Doc Russell [FC: BNP Press Officer] had a heated argument with Arthur Kemp about Tony Lecomber. Kemp told him he was a useless fat old f###er who should just go away. This was the real reason for his departure, and not because of Doc's first wife being Polish.

"The general feeling amongst the (ever growing) anti-Griffin crowd, is that Griffin wishes to use the European elections to put all the party's resources into fighting the best seat. Griffin hopes to get elected, whereby he'll be on £250,000 a year tax free + expenses + pension. After five years, he would then be in a position to switch parties if he so wished (ahem), and then possibly retain his seat for another five years.

"Ciao for now,"

It's an interesting thought that of those on this list, Arthur Kemp has been named by Gaye Darby-Lewis (wife of jailed South African patriot Clive Darby-Lewis) as a South African police spy, Simon Darby (who lives a comfortable middle class life style without visible means of support, and claims to be in business while working virtually full time for the BNP, without drawing a salary from the party) is probably a career MI5 agent, while the late John Tyndall suspected that Tony Lecomber had been "turned" by the British state during his second spell in gaol (when he received a remarkably light sentence for attacking a Jewish school teacher). Lee Barnes is completely insane, while Patrick Harrington is nominally the leader of another political party (the Third Way)!

The Liberal Disease

I think that Liberalism is a disease.

It wasn't always so: or at least not universally so.

In days gone by (read this in sepia tones) the liberals included a radical element, that sought to offer an alternative to the landed gentry, and thus offer some basic freedoms to the people.

Thus (before he saw through the charade and wrote his fascinating book The Party System - available from FC) we see Hilaire Belloc, the well-known Distributist author, Christian Social Teaching propagator and patriot, as a Liberal MP.

I suppose you might compare the situation 100 years ago with the early Labour Party which did contain some patriotic genuine anti-collectivist "socialists" who were sickened by the social injustice of Capitalism.

Such a thing would be unthinkable today as (socialists as well as) liberals (both the party political type and the other) are more likely to be found carrying banners for homosexual rights, free narcotics usage, abortion on demand and countless other policies of great detriment to the individual, the family, the community, the nation and (to use the old fashioned term so out of favour today) Christendom as a whole.

But do not, oh faithful and true reader, be fooled into thinking that liberalism is a cancer that dwells solely in the ranks of the Liberals Democrats and sister parties across the world.

Tut tut.

Were that it were so.

We might have some kind of self-contained asylum. We might point at liberals through the bars and laugh at their nonsensical gibberings and sudden anarchic movements of limb - as the monied idle rich used to tour Bedlam 150 years ago in some kind of morbid fascination.

Oh look at Menzies Campbell tweaking the straps on Charlie Kennedy's straight jacket! Oh yes. Hours of fun.

No, oh fellow beacon of fidelity in these tiresome and treacherous times, sadly the liberal canker has entered the entire body politic to some degree or another.

We have seen this in recent times with the Labour and Tory Parties moving evermore to the quagmire of the Centre Ground and the ejection of ideology in favour of Presentation Politics.

Yes yes... I know Bill Clinton was a philandering degenerate who could barely keep his pecker under wraps - but didn't he have lovely well coiffured hair?

OK. I'm being the ultimate pedant, but you understand what I mean. How often have you heard some brain dead moron say about (as just one example) Blair:

I don't like what Tony Blair did in regards to Iraq - but he comes across so well and looks like "a pretty straight kinda guy."

As if any of that means anything. Blair appeared in shirt sleeves with a mug of tea and somehow we're all supposed to think that illegal wars, mass murder and conspiracy to loot a nation is acceptable because he tells us he's "a pretty straight kinda guy."

If he is "a straight kinda guy" then Peter Tatchell should be the next Archbishop of Canterbury!

Zoiks.

So we have a situation where most of the three main parties are moving to this grey mishmash "centre ground politics."

People lose interest in politics as they all rush to defend multi-racism.

Oh yes "gay rights" (sic) are the order of the day!

Abortion is an accepted part of society.

The banks and debt are not to be debated.

Social control, big brother, police state... all are implemented by fits and starts.

The EU - with all its larger scale corruption, nepotism, missing accounts - is accepted.

There is no real debate any more.

The only difference is the speed of change on various issues, from immersion in the EU to rights for degenerate faggots.

All we get is smoke and mirrors, bread and circuses... TV sound byte news is proffered to us and we are all meant to clap, moan or tut tut quietly whilst resolving to put another X in a box next time around.

As if putting another politician, chosen behind Lodge doors in the den of treachery (to mirror the den of iniquity that is the Bank of England) in the palace of Westminster, in the place of a similar one will make the blindest bit of difference!

The politicians wonder why the voters are losing interest! We are aware that they are all the same: all treacherous money-grubbing, treacherous, selfish, arrogant scumbags surrounded by their cronies and filling their pockets while they can.

And so we get elections were the man with the best suit or haircut wins the seat.

And so my third vomit bucket nears the rim!

And what of nationalism?

Sadly nationalism isn't free of this festering sore.

I was reading someone's post on a forum the other day. Yes an internet forum, where the keyboard warrior reigns supreme and the faeces-stirrers employ all their double-meaning verbiage to excuse the inexcusable and employ character assassination against anyone just and true.

I caught one short post by one chap against one liberal poster and I thought it most apt.

In two short sentences he said (and this isn't verbatim):

'Your language defending homosexuality and your posts defending race-mixing speak volumes. You are not a nationalist and you don't belong on this forum.'

The forum is supposed to be or Racial Nationalists, and the 'liberal' in question is oft seen defending the Kosher-Tory policy as dictated b y the pocket-filling upper echelons of the BNP.

Seeing so-called nationalists repeating the lies of the faggot lobby, of the Zionist lobby, of the integrationists and so on ad nauseum really is incredible - and sometimes you have to pinch yourself because it all seems so unreal.

And why? For votes?

And so we end up with another party under the control of the bankers, the Freemasons, saying the same old lies about homosexuality, the same old lies about Israel, the same old "power of nightmares" CIA/Mossad lies.

A friend sent an e-mail to me the other day. It came from a comrade who, until recently, was in the leadership circle of the BNP but who had, quite frankly had enough of the Chinese water Torture of liberalisation: drip, drip, drip...

He sent a poem which went along the lines of:

First they came for the Tyndallites,
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Tyndallite.

Then they came for those who wanted account transparency,
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't asking for account transparency.

Then they came for the Skinheads,
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Skinhead.

Then they came for the Revisionists...
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Revisionist.

Then they came for the Anti-Zionists...
And I didn't speak out because I wasn't an Anti-Zionist.

Then finally they came for me...

OK, it's a fun piece, but it does go some way to show how creeping liberalism is infecting every part of the political process.

Just a few years ago if someone said a nationalist org would have a leading member publicly making excuses for homosexuals, Zionists etc. I'd think him mad.

Third Way tried it in the late 90s to no avail. I remember one article they wrote about a by-election count when they poured scorn on the BNP officials present for staying clear from an Asian woman. The Third Way writer said he, unlike the BNP, would be more likely to chat her up...

Ahem.

and so we see Liberalism come full circle within nationalism.

The NF all but split in 1989 over nationalists making overtures to Zionists. Nick Griffin and others were having none of it and left the NF.

The pro-Zionist remnant became Third Way. Now Third Way have linked up with the (Nick Griffin led) pro-Zionist BNP and so there seems a meeting of the ways with those elements who believe that Jews and non-Whites are "Britons" or who want to take a more liberal line on homosexuality and Zionism...

It may appeal to those voters who like a nice short back and sides, and appreciate canvassers in nice suits: but it doesn't sit well with nationalists who actually believe in nationalism.

Whoever said the more things change the more they stay the same?

Seems as though, for the moment at least, we'll still have to watch the antics of the liberal inmates.

Just don't stick your fingers through the bars!