Affordable Croatia? Part 2

Read this piece (see first link below) on a BNP meeting.

There are a number of interesting questions which arise from this:

1. Why was arch-Zionist Lee Barnes present? He is not even a BNP member, yet he has this kind of access to (what must surely be) an important meeting. The chap feeding the info to The Observer got the impression he was No. 2 in the BNP!

Barnes has published some of the most outrageously Neo-Con and pro-Israeli material, even supporting Israel when they invaded Lebanon, which only the most diehard Zionists did.

2. Who is Alan Goodacre? Economics adviser??? A rather tenuous title (like Barnes's "legal advisor" - is this a Blairite government by advisors?), and he has also written some appallingly liberal trash for the BNP (and wrote "Our party no longer denies the Holocaust, an obvious historical fact" to the Jewish Chronicle).

Have historical "certainties" or open debate ever been voted on at a BNP AGM? Or is Goodacre (who he?) of sufficient seniority in the kosherised BNP to espouse New BNP policy in an e-mail to the Jewish Chronicle?

Is there a kosher trend here?

Perhaps Goodacre had a "suitcase full of money" perhaps not... but it's all a bit Walter Mitty anyhow, if not Monty Python!

Is that how seniority is bought in the BNP? Is that how policy is decided?

I hope details of the "suitcase" of money for Mr. Griffin's expenses were passed onto the BNP's accountant! ;-)

3. Certainly it is interesting that the BNP invite an "expert" (McKillop) with links to the Jewish big businessman Sir James Goldsmith (Sir Jammy Fishpaste as Private Eye called him).

Those of any importance at this meeting seem to fit a certain neo-con Zionist stamp.

As for the land itself:

1. Who owns the land? According the report a mysterious and wealthy BNP member: another Kosher patriot? Another Israel-Firster?

2. How can BNP members go there if it is owned by one individual? This could all die overnight, or given over to one or a handful of leaders "in trust" for the BNP...

3. Are shares being pimped to BNP members? If so, will they actually be worth anything?

4. If trips are made there... we hope no asbestos removal is undertaken...

5. Given the nature of the meeting participants, might this be some kind of Neo-Con pay-off? "You turn the BNP into a Jewish friendly, liberal-race, poof-member party which just bashes on the Muslim ticket" the sort of thing Barbara Amiel might arrange.

I for one do not believe this claptrap about the oil running out. It may in the future, but bio-fuels and other sources will be found by then. We're in more "danger" from the arguable theories on "global warming" and certainly in more danger (should I tell the BNP?) from economic collapse or inter-racial/tribal conflict.

That is if Israel doesn't start WW3 in the meantime (shh. don't tell Barnes or Goodacre).

The oil running out seems like a convenient smoke screen for some kind of retirement fund pay-off, or (if BNP members are being asked to "invest") another cheap scam.

Beware! Zionists are tied into this one...

Link:
Observer piece on BNP meeting
Allan Goodacres Fawning Letter to the Jewish Chronicle
Evidence of Goodacre linking-up with Zionists
Others note BNP's overtures to Zionists
Possible Goodacre dodginess
Zionist celebrates the New BNP!
"if the chairman has to choose it will be Barnes"
"I support Israel 100%" writes BNP chief polemicist Lee Barnes with Griffin's blessing
"The BNP has committed ideological suicide with its latest pro-Israel piece"

BNP Letter to JC

"A BNP View"

The link above may change or stop before too long - so go see it now.

This letter (to The Jewish Chronicle's editor), carefully worded though it is, is an attempt by an increasinly proto-Zionist party to appeal to jews for their support in fighting "Islamofascism" (a term used almost exclusively by Neo Cons).

This letter - written by a BNP Official, must have had top-level clearance with the BNP.

After all, the last time (I can remember - though they may have been more) a nationalist wrote into The Jewish Chronicle to placate the Zionists and 'play down' the party's 'anti-semite past' it resulted in a walk-out from that party by those not content to see their party play footsy with Zionism, either by seeking the Jewish lobby as allies or by adopting the "two State solution" (i.e. recognising Israel's right to exist).

The party that time was the National Front, the letter-writer and party official was Patrick Harrington and the appalled (nay, infuriated) gent who led the walk-out of activists? A Mr. Nick Griffin!

How times change. It's now all to the good that a party's economics spokesman writes into the JC deploring his party's past. Welcome to the glorious world of party politics!

Bow down to the Zionists, worship the false idol of "democracy," turn a blind-eye to homosexual members - and you'll be.... no different from the rest!

Here's the text of the letter from the JC in full. Highlights added for effect:

---

I write to you concerning Melanie Phillips’s article about the British National Party (JC, November 10).

I realise the party’s unfortunate past gives understandable grounds for scepticism about its reformed position on the Jews, but I would respectfully make the following points.

Quoting the discredited and expelled John Tyndall to prove what the party believes today is like quoting Michael Foot to prove what Tony Blair really thinks.

Complaining that we consider only “some” Jews bad is absurd, unless you believe that all Jews, unlike the rest of fallen humanity, are always 100 per cent good.

Our party endorses democracy, so how can it be fascist, given that contempt for democracy is the essence of fascism? And, while Ms Phillips may approve of Paul Wolfowitz’s actions, our criticism of him is essentially the same as made by respectable liberal organs such as the Guardian, so this is hardly evidence that we are fascists.
Our party no longer denies the Holocaust, an obvious historical fact.
We are not “obsessed with the Jewish question” but the whole world is obsessed with this small people, a fact reflected in media coverage and political demonstrations. We must address an ideological issue people think is important, whether or not it really is.
We hope that our future behaviour may in time bring you to understand that our repudiation of antisemitism is genuine. We are the only party in Britain that is truly serious about fighting the Islamofascist threat.

Alan Goodacre,

British National Party,

alan_goodacre@yahoo.co.uk

---

As democracy is a cloak for control of Judeo-Freemasonry - too right those of us the BNP might label as "fascists" - despite our ideology etc. - have a contempt for it.

Democracy has given us continual Tweedledum and Tweedledee politicians. Democracy has given us faggot rights, mass immigration, abortion on demand... need I go on?

Democracy has given us Bush and Blair.

In order to try and join the democratic soiree, groups like the BNP have to bow and scrape to groups like the JC, (and praise the Holocaust!) a kind of spiritual circumcision, in order just to be "accepted."

If I wanted to join a fight to stop "Islamofascism" I'm better off joining up with the Republican Party in America, or the Israeli 'Defence' Force.

---

Scroll down below the BNP Official's letter and you'll see this letter written by an anti-Zionist Red. He's picked up on the BNP's change of climate too:


Melanie Phillips describes an article I wrote for the Morning Star as “a vicious attempt to link the Jews with the fascists.” In fact, my article was mainly a critique of the claim, made by the all-party parliamentary committee on antisemitism, that the far right has allied itself with Islamists in order to incite hatred against the Jewish community. In its public propaganda, the BNP has almost entirely abandoned antisemitism in favour of inciting hatred against Muslims, and openly promotes the Islamophobic views of the Jewish author Bat Ye’or.

Of the future evolution of the BNP under Nick Griffin’s leadership, I wrote that “the possibility of the BNP making a pitch for the support of a right-wing minority within the Jewish community on an anti-Muslim programme, as the far-right party Vlaams Belang has successfully done in Belgium, cannot be excluded.” I fail to see how that amounts to an attempt to “smear Jews… as being the neo-fascists’ natural allies.”

It is not surprising that Melanie Phillips takes offence at the suggestion that fascists might find common ground with anti-Muslim right- wingers within the Jewish community. Last year, a BNP writer name-checked Phillips as one of the newspaper columnists whose opinions BNP supporters feel “most closely match their own.”

Geoffrey Brown,

geoffrey_r_brown@yahoo.co.uk