In today's Daily Mail Richard Littlejohn brings relief to the bloodied, encircled and battle-weary band of revisionists and their supporters who are painted as Beelzebub's followers in the modern media.
Right: Littlejohn, Melanie Phillips and countless other "right wing" columnists use Holocaustianity to silence criticism of Israel, the Zionist Lobby and everything they do and control.
He says:
"This column has been derided for claiming that belief in global warming is a religion, not a science."
Quite so Mr. Littlejohn!
But if this is the case, and if there is a racket going on - an "industry" if you will - with vast amounts of money involved, brow-beating of anyone who dares oppose it, a virtual media blackout of opposing voices and so on ad nauseum, what dare Mr. Littlejohn say about the Holocaust Industry (aka Shoa Business)?
With flimsy Soviet-built evidence, the word of profiteers and the backing of an Israeli Lobby that depends on Holocaustianity Guilt to get away with mass murder, illegal spy rings, illegal nukes, state-sponsored terrorism, torture, ethnic cleansing and much worse; we can safely say that if Global Warming is a religion then how much more so is Holocaustianity?
As writers better and braver than I have contested, Holocaustianity has sought to replace the Sacrifice of Christ on Calvary as the epicentre of history and the singular event in history that won man's deliverance, with the "sacrifice" of the alleged 6 million as the epicentre of history - an event which delivered a people (who have long derided Christ and His Death and Resurrection - Christ Deniers if you will) their State, Israel.
Holocaustianity has its shrines, its temples, its clerics, its followers, its preachers and more.
It also has a stranglehold on the media, with the likes of Littlejohn himself using it to excuse the worst excesses of Israeli murder and the leaked news of vile anti-gentile actions, guidelines and texts both ancient and modern that very rarely leak into the media.
Darwin's creed of evolution is also a religion, for there is no proof, there are no "missing links" and we are taught it as fact (not theory) in school. It too has its believers, its high priests, its structures and temples.
Some years ago a book on evolution was entitled "Why Colleges Breed Communists" as it argued that modern schools preached Darwinism to "prove" to schoolchildren that God didn't exist, the Creation was a myth.
In those same schools we now see Holocaustianity pushed, alongside Darwinism, rights for homosexuals, "safe sex" and all the rest of the modern world's creed.
If the Evolutionary Theory (yes, it is just a Theory) meant that 'Colleges Breed Communists' then you can be sure, dear reader, that Holocaustianity is pumped into our schools (not, you'll notice studies of Communism's gulags, or the role of Jewry in anti-Christian Communism) in an attempt to get our colleges to breed Zionists.
Once upon a time many people (sheep if you like, certainly many cattle - sorry - goyim) believed in the theory that Capitalism was the zenith of our Civilisation; that the Bankers were modern day gods and the almighty dollar was the altar at which they worshipped.
Recent events have in fact shown Capitalism to be the empty vessel that it was, with usury haven rotted out its insides and the greedy men at the top seen as the sordid little "Wizards of Oz" they undoubtedly are.
Recent events have also shown many people that Israel is in fact a bandit state almost choc full of a murderous, totally racist and anti-Christian people.
Despite the idea that Darwinism could breed Communists, almost half of British people don't believe in it; and many people are now starting to question Global Warming and its acolytes.
All of these false creeds are starting to crumble, for none of them can bear any close inspection and rely on the blind faith of their followers, coupled with the guilt, fear or greed of everyone else.
Of course Holocaustianity has the edge for the very notion of questioning it is illegal in several nations and is all but verboten in our "free" media.
When Communists, Zionists, Capitalists, Freemasons et al question Christianity they come up against a brick wall because the facts of it are undeniable. Its history is proven, its central tenets have been proven right time and time again, and its social teaching is for the betterment of man, families, communities and nations.
Their own creeds do not stand up to any scrutiny at all and have to constantly mutate, die and be reborn in order to hoodwink new generations into slavery and subservience.
Through the Centuries Christian Crusaders, preachers and stalwarts have faced down these enemies of civilisation, using debate and the sword to bring about their downfall. The difference today is that the enemies of civilisation, those who have stood behind the forces trying to subvert Christendom -- Judeo-Freemasonry -- are in the ascendancy and control our governments, the banks, the media et al. which is why they screech (like the "alien" Bodysnatchers in the film Invasion of the Bodysnatchers, which itself was a warning against Communism and how it subverts free minds) whenever a Revisionist rears his head or speaks the truth (witness Bishop Williamson).
Despite all this, one thing we can all be assured of is that when Holocaustianity and the rest of the modern world's creeds have crumbled, Christianity will still stand as it has for 2000 years. And Holocaustianity will be just another bad memory consigned to the dustbin with Communism, Capitalism and all the other "isms" that have assailed Christian Civilisation down the centuries.
When Leon Degrelle stood in the ruins of Europe in 1945 and the Red Beast was bearing down on central Europe, with its NKVD Commissars urging native Russians and others to take their revenge via rape, murder and pillage he knew that Europe would survive, that Communism would crumble and that Christianity would win through in places like Poland and Russia, with the spires of ancient churches (many laid low by the USAAF/RAF) would rise again.
The Roman Empire fed Christians to the lions, the Communists murdered millions of Ukrainian Christians, the Capitalists fed millions of Christians into their slave-like factories, mines and workhouses.
Holocaustianity is now attempting to brow beat anyone that opposes it into silence via jails and media approbation. Even Poles who tried to raise Crosses to remember Polish war dead at Auschwitz were assaulted, besmirched and thrown out by Zionist activists in their sheer hatred of anything Christian!
Perhaps the Zundels, Rudolfs and Mahlers of this world should join hands and start singing "we shall overcome" in order to win their freedom?
The modern jailers will get no further than their NKVD counterparts in the Ukraine of 1933 or Germany 1945.
As Christ Himself said: The Truth will set you free. Not that the bought and sold media columnists like Littlejohn would know that being Israel Firsters almost to a man.
In Hoc Signo Vinces.
Friday, 27 March 2009
Littlejohn, Global Warming & the 'Holocaust'
Sunday, 5 October 2008
The BNP, MI5 & Zionism: A Long Term Objective?
THE REAL ENEMY
An interesting link (see first link below) here for two reasons.
- The fact that John Tyndall, albeit self-induced to some degree, seems to realise that his party was taken over as the result of a conspiracy either controlled or used by the State in the light of government/MI5 statements in the 90s re. attacking and bringing down nationalism.
- The feedback to the piece suggests that the BNP has been turned, at least because sections of it are now draping themselves in Stars of David (remember too that Mark Cotterill's false EFP was condemned by the local Green Party for using the Israeli Flag in its electoral campaigning).
This not hearsay or opinion. This can be evidenced from the material out there and the increasingly Neo-Con nature of the material coming from the BNP, not to mention the Zionist language that comes from certain BNP people who are kept in their positions by the BNP leadership.
Where are the complete and convincing condemnations of Israel?
Where are the complete and convincing condemnations of Zionist power in banking, Hollywood, Big Business, Freemasonry etc.?
Of course these do not have to be in election leaflets, of course these do not have to be in headlines, of course these do not have to underpin community actions and activities, etc.
But an awareness and an education of militants as to the history of geo-politics and that the real enemy runs our parliament, banks, the City of London, Big Businesses etc. will at least ensure that nationalism isn't used and abused as a Boot Boy of Zionism.
By all means keep the "populist" language in East London, Lancashire, the Black Country etc.
But this kow-towing to Israeli policy and Neo-Con language stinks. Furthermore the grassroots of the nationalist movement know it stinks.
Left: Neo Con voices on the "right" like Richard Littlejohn (pictured) and Melanie Phillips, as well as the Neo Con voices on the "left" like Nick Cohen and David Aaronovitch, ensure that the people, Labour and Tory voters, see the non-existent "Al Qaeda" as the big threat and not Zionism, Capitalism, American Imperialism, etc.
The BNP can condemn us for being "purists." The BNP can set its freelance attack dogs on us to spread smears. The BNP can close its collective eyes and convince itself that its insistence that Islam is the only enemy or the only evil that we face.
None of this will change the facts.
In the early 90s the State announced that it would destroy a nationalism that was anti-Zionist and already had its agents at work.
In the 00s we have a "nationalism" that is either ambivalent or even pro-Zionist (NB: even to accept Israel's "right" to exist is to be Zionist) and we can assume that the State agents have played their part.
As the Oriental curse goes: "May you live in interesting times."
We certainly are!
P.S. Those with long memories will remember that the leader of the BNP started his about-turn in BNP policy viz a viz Israel, Zionism etc. with a very interesting, long, fair and courteous feature/interview with David Aaronovitch (in which NG said the BNP was like a super tanker which would take a long time to turn around!). It has also been helped along with various puff pieces - dressed up as "warnings" from Nick Cohen.
Both Aaronovitch and Cohen are avowed Neo Cons whose main bugbear is "Islamofascism" or "Islamification." In other words the men who have promoted an "Islamophobic" (read Neo Con) BNP are two of the main Zionist Neo Con columnists in Britain whom, it may be assumed by some, could be in the pay of Mossad.
Links:
BNP, MI5 and Neo Cons
Aaronovitch slams anti-Zionism, even on the left!
Aaronovitch Watch
Aaronovitch Introduces a Nick Griffin Video on TV!
Nick Cohen Defends Fellow Neo Con Palin
Nick Cohen is a Right-Wing Neo Con
Aaronvitch is a Neo Con
Anti war on ex-Commie Neo Con
Monday, 28 July 2008
Freemasons Boast of their Power
An Irish supporter sent this in when confirming delivery of his order from last week [thanks C!].
In his own words:
It's a video showing the influence and organisation of Freemasonry, including world leaders who have been Freemasons. But what's really interesting is that this video is actually made by a Freemason. Even when they speak for themselves, they admit their sinister influence.
Now what other insidious group trying to run our affairs can we think of who continually boast of their connections, power and influence?
Thankfully it's still legal to talk openly about the Masons, with the others it's borderline.
Talking of which, does anyone notice the two people being lined up as possibles/probables to take over Labour from Gordon Brown?
Jack Straw and one of the Milliband brothers.
Now what religion do you think they belong to?
Put it this way - and just to show I'm not in the business of stirring up "hatred" here (just chewing the fat and discussing the issues) - imagine if the two main runners to take over were Muslim.
Ooh la la!
Imagine the uproar from the media and their spook-puppet columnists like Abramovitch, Littlejohn and Phillips! Imagine the uproar from the "most Zionist" BNP! Even the Tories and Liberals would bring into question our "western democratic ideals" and insure the candidates were pro-homosexual and pro-"womens rights" etc. etc., not to mention pro-Israel!
Yet here we have two candidates from a group known to usually be fervently pro-Israel and with the "right to return" to a country we might (yeah, I know, laugh it up) have to impose sanctions against or even go to war with (over, say, illegal WMDs...) and not a dickybird is uttered by any columnists or any political parties!
Coincidence? Bloody hell, many of them had kittens because a government minister was a member of a "hardline" Catholic group - remember that? She was made to state that her membership and beliefs wouldn't encroach on a government/system that's pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, pro-feminist etc. etc.
Would the media dare treat Straw or Milliband in that way? They didn't when either of them became ministers.
Surely we should all expect a little 'equality' here: equality of treatment, equality of media reaction?
Still that's "democracy" for you!
Friday, 4 July 2008
Lord Phillips & Sharia Law: A False Flag Operation?
I feel a bit grubby today. I had to scrub my hands and have a jolly good wash before I started work.
Yes, I have a confession to make to you. I.... no, I can't write this. It's just not right!
OK. Steady now. Fight back the tears. Chest out, chin up. Right. Here we go.
I bought a copy of the Daily Express!
Yes!
It's true! Oh the shame! Oh the ignominy!
I can feel my invitations to polite society functions drying up as I type this.
I had to ask the (White!!!) newsagent for a plain brown paper bag to put it in before I left the shop for fear of being spotted down the high street with such nefarious reading material.
So what possessed me to swallow my pride and go to the counter red-faced eager to pass over the 40p, get the paper in a bag and scuttle out of the shop as quickly as possible?
I scanned the headlines for news on the issue that the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, had said Shariah Law could be justified in the UK.
No doubt the Daily Mail would cover it best - perhaps with input from the Lilliputians Melanie Phillips or Richard Littlejohn. Yet it was sold out, so I had to plump for Richard 'Dirty' Desmond's offering. Desmond publishes the Express in which he tries to mimic the moral outrage of the middle classes, yet he also owns quite a few TV porno channels (the magazine Private Eye regularly entertains its readers by juxtaposing Express moralising with titles from Desmond's porn offerings).
What did my perusal of the Express teach me? Little more than I expected, various Neo Cons, Tories and similar were screeching. A Tory MP hurrumphed "This is totally unacceptable."
Indeed.
So why is it OK then for Jewish autonomous courts to oversee problems in Jewish families (this is exactly what Lord Phillips was suggesting re. Muslim families) and not for Muslims?
Do we have a double standard when it comes to dealing with Jews and Muslims?
This Talmudic law set-up is already in practice and recognised by the courts. Even the arch-Zionist and whitewasher of Israeli crimes (no, not Lee Barnes!) Melanie Phillips had to recognise this basic fact a few months back on the BBC's Question Time programme.
When she had to admit to the existence of these Jewish courts, and recognition of them by the UK law courts, it took the wind right out of Ms. Phillips's sails. Oh you could see she was longing to launch into a tirade against Islam and "Islamic extremists." But how could she do that without allowing others to launch into tirades against Judaism and "Jewish extremists," such as herself!
But there's more dear reader! (Oh yeah - I'm not finished yet...)
Did you know there's an officially recognised Jewish area in London? Oh yes!
There is an area of London which has a wire going around it on poles. I don't know who paid for this, who maintains it, but I suspect it had government and planning approval. This means that within this area Jews can travel about and do other things (I don't know Jewish Talmudist rules and their anally retentive "laws") on their Sabbath (Saturday).
The idea that we are starting down the road of handing over England to a foreign, invading, offensive and anti-Christian religion is false!
Talmudic Judaism (which is all of the above) is already well and truly encroaching on the judicial and governmental (not to say financial and entertainment) spheres of this land.
But there's more!
There is a state funded school in North London that blocks admissions from people outside a certain racial group. Even more, it even blocks admissions from families that aren't exactly of the racial type they want.
Where is this hotbed of discrimination and racial prejudice?
The JFS, formerly the Jewish Free School, recently refused a place to an 11-year-old boy whose mother had converted to Judaism (though I understand the father is Jewish).
Here's a quote from a linked article below:
Dinah Rose, QC, representing [the child], said that the school would accept a child of Jewish-born “committed atheists” but exclude others who are “Jewish by belief and practice” because of their mother's descent.
That, my friends is racism no matter how the courts whitewash it by comparing it to Muslim or Christian schools.
if I convert to Islam or any Christian denomination I would get into one of their schools (indeed it's well known that Christian and Muslim schools welcome those from outside their religions - though few if any choose to go to Muslim ones. Catholic schools, on the other hand, accept a wide range of children whose parents want to get them in to schools which perform well).
If a Muslim or Jew converted to Anglicanism or Catholicism do you think it would be lawful for a CofE or RC School to block them because they were born otherwise? Even if the rest of the family were CofE or RC?
Yet a Jewish school can block children on racial (not religious!) grounds and the courts find an excuse for them??? It's crazy!
So as you travel through cyberspace in the next few hours or days and witness the Neo Con, Zionist and Tory denunciations of Lord Phillips and Shariah Law, wonder why these same people have stayed quiet over the system's acceptance of Jewish religious law, Jewish racism and an official Jewish zone in our capital city.
Or is "Islamophobia" more acceptable than "anti-Semitism?" Out of interest, I have little brief for either term.
Left: Islamic Nazis from Bosnia. These are the kind of images that Neo-Cons love to use as it brings all the bogeymen together!
There was a time when Christian laws forbade usury. There was even a time, not so long ago (and some say it still is on the statute books), when Christian law forbade blasphemy and promotion of foul language. There was certainly a time when Christian law ensured the correct line was taken on homosexuality and abortion.
Yet in today's humanist, relativist society those times have passed. Rights for everyone in the wrong, including criminals, is all the rage.
We face a battle in which humanism wants to integrate certain aspects of Muslim, Jewish and yes even Christian laws - but all in a very low-level way so as to enshrine some kind of "multi-culti" inclusiveness. At the same time the defendants of the humanist system are seeking to treat the three main religions in distinctly different ways:
1. Christianity. The humanists show little but disdain of the religion of the land. They seek to use human rights legislation, especially but not exclusively on homosexuality, to attack the Church and traditional morals.
2. Judaism. The system gives every encouragement to this religion, allowing it to operate as a law within a law, with its own structures, courts, security groups etc. There is also explicit support from a media which paints any form of criticism as hatred: a position it does not take on either Christianity or Islam. The recent ruling on the JFS (see link below) is an example of "one law for them..."
3. Islam. The system wishes to integrate some minor elements of Islam so that it can be seen to be "inclusive," ironically more for racial than religious reasons. However, the Neo-Con nature of the political and media sections of the establishment means that Islam itself (especially as it takes a more robust line on homosexuality, Judaism etc.) is painted as the main threat to our society - as opposed to the forces who are controlling or undermining the structures of the land.
For nationalists, the choice is clear. We can oppose growing humanism in our lands (including liberalisation of moral laws and partial acceptance of Judaism and Islam) or we can join humanist forces in opposing the Islamist bogeyman.
For nationalists who take a traditional stance, the former choice is obvious. It means defending our traditions and being aware of our enemies from all angles. It won't be easy and we will be painted as "extremists" for opposing the humanist agenda of all the major parties.
For nationalists who want scraps from the top table, who want nice media coverage and who want to fight on the agenda of the Neo Cons, then defending the status quo is the option - and a Pim Fortuyn style of attacking Islam by defending "western liberal democracy" becomes the 'populist' way.
My gut instinct is that the whole Sharia Law episode is what some label a "false flag" operation, designed to whip up hysteria whilst providing a smoke screen for increased liberalism and the Jewish courts already accepted by our justice system.
As some coloured gents in America once said: don't believe the hype.
Link:
Jewish State School Cleared of Race Hate
Friday, 11 April 2008
Which is the Most Zionist Political Party?
First of all I should apologise for the dearth of blog entries here over the last week and a half.
Sad to say the monotonous daily slog of working life and a few extra jobs, long promised which finally caught up with me, took their toll.
So much has happened over the last week or so, it's hard to know where to start.
In my car the other day I heard some "expert on terrorism" (usually a by-word for MI5 muppet, on the payroll) wail that there were 2000 known "jihadists" in England with a further 2000 "unknown."
That's as maybe, but it proffers some interesting questions for the astute nationalist.
1. Are our "feds" to be believed or are the cooking the figures?
2. How do they know there are 2000 "unknown" 'terrorists' - seems a nice round figure.
3. So are these like Rumsfeld's "known unknowns" or his "unknown unknowns?"
4. As ex-Mossad man Viktor Ostrovsky (I hope I got that name right from memory) admitted there were 2000 Mossad agents in London alone (that's right - just in London, not including other Zionist hot spots like Manchester, Gateshead etc.) why doesn't this get mentioned?
5. If the Mossad have their people on the payroll of media, government, banking, big business etc. - as can be safely assumed - are these more dangerous to our national security than a few nutters who get on TV because they go paint balling???
meanwhile, all this got the attention of one Melanie "Mad Mel" Phillips, the carpet chewing poster girl (OK, sorry, that's a step too far!) for the Zionists and their mouthpiece in the media who bewailed all these Muslims running riot and that London was now a magnet for Jihadis.
As we can assume Mad Mel is on the Mossad payroll one can't see her bewailing Zionist manipulation of our government, media et al.
meanwhile a Zionist went to the media moaning about a group who are pumping out material that is far more Zionist than any of the main political parties. Weird you might think: why on earth should he moan about a way-out Zionist outfit, more craven in its support for the Bandit State than even Cameron, Brown and Whohe of the LibLabCon?
Because, our long suffering reader, that group is the BNP!
Aside from leaflets defending our "Jewish, Christian and secular" values - erm - the BNP has been openly courting the Jewish vote and pumping out material which confirms what most of us knew years ago: the BNP has become a multi-racist, Zionist, queer-tolerant anti-Muslim pressure group.
But there you go. Those of us who warned about all this were called trouble-makers and s###-stirrers at the beginning. Now it's too late and we may bemoan the Star-of-David branding on the gelding's hide, but that particular horse has long since left the stable and now amount of locking the doors will achieve anything.
Click on the link below and you'll see the relevant piece with the most interesting quotes and parts highlighted by our chums at NW Nationalists.
As for the rather pathetic legalese of the BNP leader that they would bash Muslims rather than support Iran, as usual this is clever Zionoid language designed to sweeten the pill.
1. He doesn't mention supporting Israel rather than Iran.
2. he doesn't offer any - ahem - third position, such as armed neutrality (remember the 80s Nick?): perhaps neither Islam nor Israel as a slogan?
3. If one is to question Islam and the hatred against us it promotes, then one is duty bound to do the same to Judaism.
4. Whilst no-one expects the BNP to take a "pro-Iranian" line, is it really too much to ask the BNP to state 'no more Zionist wars.' Such would be a truthful position.
More and more nationalists - including people who were, until recently, inside the BNP - now think the BNP is nothing more than a pressure valve, a cash cow, and has switched to become acceptable by parts of the system.
It's a moot point.
What cannot be denied is that the BNP's line is particularly close to the line of extreme Zionists like Melanie Phillips, Richard Littlejohn and David Aaronovitch - the latter (an obscene Neo Con "liberal" who switched sides to support the invasion of Iraq) is especially relevant because it was during a cosy chat in Wales that the BNP leader spelled out his plans to change the BNP. Was Aaronovitch the open door through which the BNP became increasingly Zionist?
What interesting times we live in!
A friend tells me the BNP are selling "Griffin was Right" at their meetings. Such humility! I noticed the past tense though... Maybe he was right, armed neutrality and all. After all surely it would have been more "popular" and garnered more votes to be just anti-Soviet and more pro-American, pro-Cruise and more 'Cold Warriors' when the Iron Curtain was still up?
There were groups around back then who did that. Most were in the pay of 'the Feds' and some were known Masonic front-groups.
Whoever said the more things change, the more they stay the same?
Keep on having fun and reading between the lines fellow patriots!
The BNP is the Most Zionist Party - Says Jew
Wednesday, 12 March 2008
Kosher Goons Cover-Up for Mossad-CIA
In the latest bizarre twist, Griffin's kosherised BNP is seeking to blame Muslims abroad and Muslims in England for drugs, especially heroin.
The link below from the NW Nationalists nails this lie. We all know that most drugs gangs are nominally Christian West Indians. We all know that most coke heads are the stupid Whites.
The Kosher BNP also knows full well that since America's invasion of Afghanistan, the exportation of heroin has mushroomed - whereas the Taliban had reduced it considerably.
Anyone with even an inkling in international affairs knows full well that the CIA and Mossad fund many of their operations via large scale movements of drugs.
Now there may well be Muslim drugs gangs, though I doubt they are any more religious than the "Christian" negro gangs.
There may well be some Muslims ("terrorists" even!) overseas who profit in exporting drugs, but they pale in comparison to the vast amounts controlled and shipped by the CIA, Mossad and those controlling the "war no terror."
We are not the only ones to see the Kosherisation of the BNP to be continuing apace.
With Lee Barnes entering the fray to screech that 'the main funding of the Islamic Jihad comes from heroin' we see, once more, how the BNP has become indistinguishable from Melanie Phillips, Richard Littlejohn, David Aaronovitch and the other hired helps of Israel.
Let the BNP expose the CIA. Let the BNP expose the Mossad. Let the BNP expose the many Jewish drug rings. Let the BNP expose the American/Zionist role in the Afghani heroin trade.
How much more of the Kosher "war on terror" bs do we have to put up with?
If it sounds Zionist, looks Zionist and smells Zionist - call it what it is: Zionist!
Link:
Griffin Blames the Muslims
Friday, 4 January 2008
The Daily Mail and the Christmas Lie
We all know the Media tells lies.
We know that the media on the one hand prom- otes multi- racism and on the other hand covers up some of the biggest conspiracies known to man (the banking swindle, mass immigration, Judeo-Masonic oligarchy etc.)
Someone shoved a cutting under my esteemed nose the other day. 'Twas a clipping from the Daily Mail (that right-wing Zionist pressure valve against asylum seekers and "militant" Islam -- sound familiar?) and it contained one of the biggest lies ever.
The lie was an 11 out of 10 on the whopper scale.
I blushed as I read it, such was the overwhelmingly obvious nature of this humongous fib.
No, it wasn't a "fib." A fib is when you tell one of the kids that the fairground is closed because you're a bit skint and don't really want them throwing up candyfloss after a ride on the waltzers.
A fib is when you say you've already put the bins out because it's raining and you want to do it later on the off chance it's going to stop.
This was a big, fat juicy 'poke- you- in- the- eye- with- a- sharpened- stick- dipped- in- bright- yellow- paint' whopper of an outright, shame-faced LIE!
It was akin to being caught on the neighbours lawn, legs akimbo, next to a freshly deposited steaming faeces (red "handed" as it were) and professing in the Queen's English "it was not I."
The editorial in question (dated 22nd December 2007) quite correctly defended Christianity and specifically Christmas from the onslaught of militant atheists, primarily reds and pseudo-intellectuals out to make a few bucks.
Left: Whilst all manner of anti-Christian and anti-family Jewish, atheist and Communist drivel is permitted in Hollywood, films such as The passion of the Christ and the Narnia films (e.g. the new Prince Caspian release) cause uproar because they are Christian.
However, the Daily Mail is, above and beyond anything else, a Zionist rag (hence the presence of the pro-Israel right-wing pressure-valves Richard Littlejohn and Melanie Phillips) and so they always have to "Judaise" Christianity in their oxy-moronic way.
The editorial commented how left-wingers and their hangers-on attack Christianity using "multi-faith" (usually a by-word for Muslims) when in actual fact Muslims don't find Christmas offensive - something we at FC have mentioned before - the real offense being taken by the reds and their pooftah, atheist and Zionist chums who really hate Christianity!
The Daily Mail lied thus:
"Never mind that Christ is revered as a prophet in both the Jewish and Islamic traditions."
That is a bare-faced LIE.
It is a lie that ridicules Christ and Christianity. It mocks one of the main reasons of the crucifixion and 2000 years of trouble, war and revolution which was the rejection of Christ by the Jews.
The idea that a religion (Judaism) that has Christ boiling in excrement in hell; that calls his mother a whore who slept with Roman soldiers magically "reveres Christ as a prophet" is obscene.
It is a BIG LIE.
It is the worst kind of editorialising and shameful revisionism.
The Muslims do regard Christ as a prophet, though they reject the Holy trinity and Christ's divine nature.
On the other hand Jews reject Christ. They do not even regard him as a "holy man" - they think he is a blasphemer and the enemy of Judaism (because they wanted a war-like Messiah to build a great Jewish Empire or at least give Jews rule over the world -- sound familiar?).
The point here is that the Daily Mail - like most right-wing Zionist pressure valves be they media or political parties - is forced to cover-up and make out that Judaism is "friendly" to Christianity and if they have to tell such huge whoppers in the process to achieve twisted Neo-Con political ends, then they see that as a lie worth telling.
Even as Christian proselytising is banned in Israel (occupied Palestine) and as "Israeli" Jews spit on any crucifix to show their disdain, the Daily Mail has the brassneck to print this utter rubbish!
Don't expect many clerics to speak out (there'll probably be more written by hardline Jews in protest because they cannot disguise their hatred of Christ and Christianity) because, like the disciples after the Crucifixion they 'hide in fear of the Jews.'
The more times change, the more they stay the same.
Link:
Atheists Upset at Next Narnia film
The Truth About the Talmud
The Talmud on Christians
The Talmud Unmasked
Thursday, 3 January 2008
BNP Minder Publishes Proof
You have to feel sorry for Matt Single. Not only has he had his home and his old flat raided; not only was his house illegally entered by BNP members acting under orders from the BNP Boss; but he's had to put up with the usual BNP-Leadership spin machine and sycophants spreading their lies about him.
Left: Just one of the four irrefutable pieces of evidence published by Matt Single (see link below)
Some of us know what that feels like, after all some of us faced Griffin spin and lies back in the 90s when he tried to ingratiate himself with John Tyndall (yes, the "dinosaur neo-nazi") after publishing the SS-praising 'Rune' magazine.
To get his hands on a BNP income (yes, he was on the payroll as "Tom North" even before it was commonly known) he was more than prepared to stab his ex-comrades in the back with a Spearhead article full of lies, half-truths, conjecture and spin. Not much has changed since then.
Since that time (1996/7?) Mr. Griffin and his ever-changing band of acolytes and cronies have turned their ire against one group of people after another.
First came the attacks on John Tyndall - his "dictatorship," his lack of financial clarity etc. (sound familiar?). OK, stop laughing.
There were the Edwardses and Newlands (Freedom Party) who were important members of the BNP. They'd dared to ask for the financial clarity promised in 1999 to be implemented. Tsk tsk! What a cheek!
There was Smith and Bennett (EFP) who ran the most important branch at the time: Burnley. They wanted to build the BNP locally but faced central mismanagement and attacks on the very branch that had brought the BNP national and international recognition.
After the many others who have been attacked (usually not over policy, but to cement Nick's leadership and to cover-up money-grubbing and cronyism) the latest is Matt and the 60 or so councilors, organisers, treasurers etc. around him.
Yet the action against Matt and Co. has been the most obscene. To have your home invaded and items taken is bad enough, but for this to happen twice!
It's not just rubbing salt in the wounds, it's pouring caustic acid in whilst grinning inanely!
What's worse is that after having gone through such a traumatic experience (with a heavily pregnant girlfriend/fiance) the BNP leadership lies started pouring out, spearheaded it seems by top Zionist cheerleader Lee "Barmy" Barnes.
To the BNP leadership's sycophants these raids/burglaries never happened. They are figments of Matt's fevered imagination and proof indeed that he is some kind of "Searchlight red/Neo Nazi splitter."
Right: Having your door smashed in isn't fun. When "nationalists" organised it - it's even worse.
Mr. Griffin speaks of a new Ribbentrop/Molotov appeasement as if to justify his mad rantings that the "rebels" are all Reds yet all "Neo-Nazis" at the same time. He knows, if anything, the "rebels" take what used to be called a "Griffinite" line.
It's funny really because watching these events unfold, it was clear that the rebels, though initially feeling 'let down' by Griffin were absolutely loyal to him and made this clear beyond any doubt. But events overtook them, and it rapidly became clear that Mr. Griffin was prepared to go to any lengths to attack these people and those sympathetic to their case, whilst covering up for the illegality and stupidity of his cronies.
This was especially worrying as one of the events involved attempted paedophilia by two of Mr. Griffin's leader-class - which the leadership cronies have tried to excuse by saying "they looked older than 16."
Imagine such a defence in a court case! Ignorance is no defence -- and to try and commit such a distasteful act on the premises at a BNP conference absolutely beggars belief! Even if the girls were over 16 (which they were not), is the BNP and its events some kind of knocking-shop?
Will one of those responsible now stop distributing (and over charging!) for BNP anti-paedophile leaflets?
Or will the BNP leadership close ranks and find excuse after excuse for these people, because they are cronies?
Right: The spin machined seems finely tuned, but it has spread so many lies against so many people, the whole deck of cards may be ready to fall.
Because they have been involved in financial mismanagement (details of that available via the Enough is Enough and the North West Nationalist Blogs) one recycling up to £5K a month, the other getting £50K BNP money to open a business which then charges the BNP for CDs at a commercial rate; it seems that the BNP would rather protect them and stir up lies, illegality and hatred against 60 plus of its own activists including councillors and organisers.
The Kosher-Tory columnist Richard Littlejohn (one of Mr. Griffin's favourites of course) has a saying: YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP.
Indeed you couldn't! Not that it stops Barmy Barnes from suggesting that all this (the raids etc.) was "made up" and so after having his home violated twice (three times if you include his Essex flat), Matt Single is forced to put the evidence of the searches/raids online.
Above: Is the BNP Zionist Barmy Barnes being seen for what he is?
Of course, I haven't even mentioned the evidence of Joey Owens, the Merseyside ex-BNP Minder and the attempted entrapment of him by BNP crony Tony Lecomber. Lecomber tried to persuade Mr. Owens into acts of Terrorism. Although publicly kicked out of the party, the last BNP accounts show that the Terrorist Lecomber (previously jailed for explosives) was still on the payroll!
Do you have to break the law to get a BNP backhander these days?
With ex-friends like these none of us need enemies!
We await the next salvo.
Link:
Proof of the warrants issued by the police against Matt Single
Monday, 9 July 2007
Littlejohn's Zionist Whitewash
So hands up. Who managed to sit through the entire programme tonight on Channel 4, fronted by Richard Littlejohn?
Everyone hates Jews - Jews hate no-one. Wasn't that how it went?
"Brave Little Israel" and so on. It was like a trip to Clichéville. Even Nick Cohen became non-Jewish (actually "I don't consider myself Jewish" -- aha a self-hater!!!).
If you believe what Littlejohn spouts you'd be forgiven in thinking the bodies of dead and mangled Jews were to be found in most towns and cities every other week!
What would have been obvious to anyone watching with a brain was that the actions of Israel and Zionist Jews have brought this about. We've been fed guilt for decades to silence criticism as Israel massacres, murders, expels and tortures.
Compared to the avalanche of thought, debate, argument and facts turning people against Israeli and Neo-Con terror, this TV programme was a pitiful response full of the old propaganda (the Protocols for goodness sake!) and who cares if some Asian corner shop is selling Mein Kampf in Arabic... hardly the same as invading a country and trying to kill and displace hundreds of thousands of civilians!
Still, there was one bright moment (or two) in this turgid Zionist propaganda. When Littlejohn was interviewing one of the Zionist "Community Security Trust" spokesmen who spotted the ITP 'US Govt Under Zionist Control' poster from over 10 years ago?
How prophetic and justified that smart glossy colour poster was!
It's nice to be proved right - by events - after all these years.
How unlike Nick Griffin's "anti-Semitism" in the BNP's The Rune... funny how some people's opinions change.
Saturday, 7 July 2007
Discrediting the Patriots
Frightened Into Silence
Here's an image just for Richard Littlejohn, Melanie Phillips and Lee Barnes.
Don't mention the wars, the terror, the murders, the torture, the expulsions, the ethnic cleansing, the illegal nukes, the spy-rings, etc.
Or they will label you an anti-Semite!
Anti-Semitism Everywhere?
One not to miss this week.
Channel 4, 8pm on Monday, there's a 'documentary' by wannabe-Neo-Con darling of the "right" Richard Littlejohn, entitled 'THE WAR ON BRITAIN'S JEWS'
Yes, expect all the usual claptrap defending the "poor Jews" (never met a poor one m'self).
In a puff-piece for the TV programme in today's Daily Mail we get an idea of where Richard "isn't Melanie Phillips dead right" Littlejohn is coming from.
Of course he goes on about Nazis - who doesn't? But he says that the main people spreading "hatred" (vomit bucket at the ready) are the Fascist left and the "Islamonazis."
It's like a Kosher-BNP training manual written by Lee Barnes!
Littlejohn says:
"Blaming Israel is the last refuge of Anti-Semitism."
No, Richard. Using the epithet of Anti-Semitism is the last refuge of the mad Neo-Con to silence any criticism of Zionism and Israel.
Some of the people surfacing in Littlejohn's magnum opus include:
Lorna Fitzsimons who used to be a MP for Rochdale. Will Littlejohn mention her Neo-Con credentials as a leading 'friend of Israel' campaigner?
Nick Cohen says he's appalled how many people support Hezbollah. Ho hum.
Two Jewish professors bemoan the academic boycott of Israel.
We even have the case of Ken Livingstone (hardly anti-Jewish!!!) and the comments he made to a journalist Oliver Finegold.
...And so on.
A plethora of instances where Jews don't like people having a pop at Israel, or supporting those who defend themselves from Israeli bully-boy terror tactics..
Hardly the kind of thing the Lebanese have had to put up with! Or the Palestinians, or the Iraqis... etc. etc.
Littlejohn should imagine an alien people taking over his country, murdering his people, poisoning his water supply, using terror and bombs, then forcing him and the survivors to flee to neighbouring countries where they'd be forced to live in shanty towns and refugee camps with no right to return to England - when any "co-patriot" of the invaders would have the automatic "right of return."
Then he might just begin to understand how the Palestinians feel.
Still, why let the truth of Zionism and Zionist crimes get in the way of some good melodramatic Neo-Con B.S.?
Let's hope Littlejohn gets richly rewarded for his Zionist waffle.
After all - the many victims of anti-Semitic crime deserve our support -- yes, you know, the Jews attacked, stabbed, shot and killed every week in our newspapers.
What do you mean you haven't heard about them? You must be an anti-Semite!
It reminds me of Melanie Phillips on the BBC's Question Time in the indefensible position of trying to excuse Israel's war-mongering and butchery, which the mixed audience was having none of, and was coming back at her with excellent points and rebuttals.
In her next Daily Mail column she wrote about the audiences' faces 'twisted with hatred' -- sheer nonsense of course, but whenever people argue forcefully and with conviction against Israel and Israeli crimes in the eyes of Phillips (and Littlejohn) it becomes "hate."
'Twas ever thus.
Link:
Littlejohn Goes Mad
----
Update (Sunday 8th July 9.50am):
An anti-Zionist comment was added to the Daily Mail web-site yesterday. This morning more pro-Zionist comments have appeared (the vast majority of comments are pro-Israel) but not the one we did.
It shows that the whole Daily Mail output is slanted towards spinning the news in favour of Israel and the Neo Cons.
