Tories: Sold Out to 'Gay' Extremists, the Corrupt EU and Big Business

Oh... and mad nutter queers. 

Tories after the local elections: "we will listen."

William Hague today: "nothing changes."

So what's the truth?

Oh the Tories will say they are changing immigration - but they can't because of the EU, asylum and 'ooman rights.

They say they will get tough on prisoners: but they can't, same reasons.

They will promise some vague referendum on the EU: but they won't deliver - as before.

So there will be no change.

UKIP are picking up Old Tory and Old Labour votes. Yet the Tories could do a few simple things to appeal to both (kind of):

• Drop "gay" marriage. It's a waste of time and money. Only appeals to the New left, extreme socialists and 0.1% of the population that are homosexual (and even some of them don't want it).
• Promise a referendum next year, and say they'll vote against it. With the Eurozone in freefall this is hardly revolutionary.
• Stop employing public schoolboys and defending the rights of utility big business to charge what they want when people are borrowing money to buy food. That smacks of the "nasty party" image.

Stop gay marriage, EU referendum (next year) and helping the people in hard times -- not that difficult really, and I even think such things would appeal to the "middle ground" the Tories seem to love.

But none of this will happen as the Tories are sold out to a minority of extreme queers, the corrupt EU juggernaut , and the mega-rich who are screwing the rest of us.

So the Tories deserve to die the death of a thousand cuts: slow and painful. They won't be missed as they have conserved nothing except injustice, sexual immorality and greed.

Ed Milliband, David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Nick Griffin: the Struggle is One

So Ed Milliband is just a 'normal guy'? Kind of reminds me of Tony Blair - remember his "I'm a straight kinda guy" b.s.?

It's Conference Season and all the parties are out spinning, lying and spreading the b.s. pretty thick.

NuLab (One Nation Lab?!?), Tories (Green Cons???) and Lib Dems - none of them can be believed. All of them lie. Whoever takes over next time the same old agendas will be followed: more faggot rights; more Zionist war; more money to financiers; more cuts to public services.

Any party that says it will do any different is lying. They are lying to grab your vote. They are lying to con simpletons.

All the Tory/NuLab/LibDem leaders are posh; all went to posh schools; all come from monied backgrounds; all favour betraying our country; all favour rights for homosexuals and undermining marriage; all want to bash our Christian heritage and all will keep the floodgates open to Third World immigrants

The sad thing is that, at the moment, nationalism is no position to offer any alternative as many years ago. The  BNP sold out years ago. The EDL is in the pockets of the usual crowd.

The state know they can buy off nationalism by offering its leaders crumbs from the table; they also know they have enough plants and stooges in nationalism to rip it apart at the drop of a hat.

We're in a perfect storm. Corrupt MPs; corrupt coppers; corrupt media; corrupt bankers - the whole rotten system has been shown to be rotten and the people are sick of them all! Yet still nationalism rots. Voters are turning to UKIP!

Nationalism was betrayed some years back when the BNP turned into a one-issue party (on Muslims) when it could have built an ideological base with a legion of members educated on banking, family issues, nationalist economics etc.: but as it all became about muzzie-bashing and grubbing for money - it lost its heart and soul, it lost the trust of its activists: so now there is a 'perfect storm' the BNP is left (politically) rudderless and out of its depth, pushed aside by a right-wing Tory style UKIP mopping up the angry and betrayed voters.

It's very much a tale of what could have been...

Over 10 years ago Third Positionists put out a leaflet saying why the BNP were wrong to support the (Zionist) war in Afghanistan. Those days seem like a lifetime ago (many lifetimes ago if you are doing a body count), yet the mess this country is in and the pitiful results for nationalism can be traced back to those days.

We live in an age of betrayed ideologies and politicians in it for themselves. The sad thing is that thanks to the BNP, people think that nationalists are exactly the same and just another bunch of the same liars and thieves as the Westminster shysters.

Poof "Weddings" - Democracy is an Arse

So we have democracy right?

None of the "main parties" had "weddings" for homosexuals in their manifestos.

Yet now they all, Tory, Lib, NuLab, SNP, PC and Green favour poof weddings (sic).

So we have no say, no choice and the usual crowd of Islingtonite Guardianistas push the agenda against what most people want AND against our traditions and the common good.

But wait! The Tories announced a discussion on it and asked for feedback didn't they?

Well, yes and no. They ignored the input of anyone opposed to their madness and said they would push ahead with overturning MILLENNIA of law, regardless of what people said!

Democracy?

People often say 'the Law is an ass.'

We might now say 'Democracy is an arse.'

What the people want, what our traditions dictate, what the common good demands and what common sense makes clear: all this is to be overturned on the altar of political correctness to give "rights" to morally corrupt, sexually deviant and mentally unhinged minority of a minority.

The world has gone mad.

What War on Drugs? Where is the Protection for our People?

The liberal agenda

I have a terrible confession (hey: it is good for the soul!).

I usually watch Newsnight. I know it's not going to expose the Bilderbergers or actually inform its viewers of why we are taxed to the eyeballs to pay billionaires who create 'money' out of thin air, but every now and then something will pop up that makes you think. It's useful to listen to whilst working of an evening, if only to cringe at politicians being politicians or to hear the latest PC Islingtonista diatribe against racism, sexism, homophobia or whatever else they decide to label normality.

Anyway, last Friday I was out and about painting the town non-red, and so I missed Newsnight for the first time in a while. I realised something was up as the Twatteratti on Twitter were foaming at the mouth again, which is usually a sign that something interesting as happened (it's a benchmark that whatever the chattering classes and incoherent immigrant-offspring fodder that make up the loudest section of Twitter are railing against is half-decent). So it was they were shrieking against Peter Hitchens (and not for the first time by any stretch of the imagination).

So today I looked up Friday's Newsnight to watch it. It was centred around a piece that is going to air later in the year on BBC3 by the "comedian" and actor Russel Brand, all about his addiction to drugs.

Interestingly he argues that the only way to beat drugs is to say no. Addicts must do cold turkey and just come off the drugs. End of. No drugs at all. Sounds sane. People who talk about teenage pregnancy and abortion in America in a similar vein are roundly attacked by liberals who think the way to stop pregnancy/abortion is to throw condoms at schoolkids. They fail to realise that promoting "safe sex" merely promotes sexual activity, which in turn leads to more teenage pregnancies and more abortions!

Similarly with drugs, the liberals, chattering classes, intelligible immigrant offspring ("innit") and the Guardianistas are keen to promote "soft" drugs. They think it's fine and dandy to pop a pill at a rave, smoke a bit of weed etc. But entering the world of drugs means drugs become acceptable, and the rise in use in soft drugs goes hand in hand with the rise in use of hard drugs (just as the rise in use of condoms goes hand in hand with a rise in use of abortuaries).

Like telling an alcoholic that it's fine to sup a Pale Ale, or down an 'alcopop' it is wrong to tell impressionable kids and should-know-better 20 and 30 somethings that somehow a spliff or a pill are just fine and dandy. Yet that is exactly what this "freedom of choice" society does. The mantra is that "as long as it doesn't hurt anyone" etc. etc. ignoring the fact that hard drugs do hurt people -- they lead to ruination, lost jobs, destroyed families, damaged communities, ransacked houses etc. etc. Drug use is not a victimless crime!

Of course the homosexual deathstyle is awash with drugs, but what else would you expect from people who choose a 'life' that opts for multiple (often anonymous or semi-anonymous) "partners," casual sex in public places, even disgusting public toilets, and often leads to the ingestion of faeces and 101 varieties of disease of which AIDS is merely the most public.

It won't be long before pointing out simple facts like these is made illegal because it "promotes hatred" -- in reality ignoring the truth promotes hatred because it allows the impressionable, the weak willed, the mentally disturbed or the sexually deviant to get involved in a death-style that is rife with drugs, violence, disease and a greater chance of an early death. But I digress.

One point where Brand is totally wrong is that he thinks, in order to help rather than tar drug users, drugs should be decriminalised. Of course this is wrong because if something is made officially "OK" rather than just OK to readers of the Guardian and the Independent, it will lead to wider use. To think otherwise is arrant nonsense. The market dictates under Capitalism. If corner shops can make money selling drugs - they will! Under the counter, not on display (like cigarettes) whatever, once it is available it will be bought and used by kids. £5, £10 or £20 hits for a night of oblivion in your front room, down the park, wherever - kids would do it. Better than a bottle of vodka or a few bottles of cider, that would be the mindset of kids out to get blotto. And soon enough we would have more users and more addicts. The profiteers might be Boots the Chemist, Abdul in the corner shop or a giant pharmaceutical corporation, rather than a local gang with knives and guns: but the end result would be the same.

There is only one way to beat drugs, just as there is only one way to beat mugging, rape, homosexuality, paedophilia: zero tolerance. Pussyfooting around leads to these social evils growing on the periphery, sneaking in and gaining ground however they can.


There is no 'war on drugs' - a term abused by the CIA and others who are themselves involved in the drugs trade, profit from it and feed those profits into black ops, shady wars and more human suffering. On the ground, in our towns and cities there is no war on drugs. If there were there could be regular urine tests at work or at the dole office, there could be sniffer dogs outside nightclubs, there could be a real clampdown on the terror gangs who bring violence and intimidation to our streets.

No-one wants to live in a police state, and I think the more we can keep the government and police out of our daily lives the better. But in a country wherein I can be stopped and fined for not wearing my seat belt (which I sometimes wear, sometimes don't) yet someone with a spliff in their pocket can be stopped and merely cautioned... well you have to wonder why? 

Time and again politicians tell us that their number one priority is the safety of our people. They use those excuses for planning and executing illegal wars and murdering thousands in other countries. Yet because drugs gangs bring violence, terror, intimidation, misery, robbery and other crime to our streets - where are the politicians slogans about protecting the people when it comes to dealing with the vermin who push drugs? The politicians clearly have no regard for the safety of our people - either the kids who get hooked on drugs, or the victims of the crime they regularly turn to to pay for their habits.

If we wish to stamp out drugs then let us really stamp them out. We can educate children that drugs are wrong and illegal. We can stamp out the drugs gangs and get them off the streets. We create a mindset of rejection, and at the same time we actively prevent the circulation of drugs so that even the tiny minority who wish to wilfully break the law and seek out illegal drugs, cannot get them (which in reality helps them!)

If we really care about the addicts, if we really care about the victims of crime, if we really care about decimated communities, and if we really care about the future of England and the Celtic nations, then we need to be serious about opposing drugs.

Of course don't expect any answers from the government. The secret state gets a large chunk of money from the international cartels; a good proportion of MPs, bankers etc. are busy snorting for Britain! The reality is that they do not care about violence on the streets, crime, the safety of the law-abiding majority.

Let us treat drugs as truly criminal instead of tipping it the wink, otherwise (like homosexuality) there will be a drip, drip of media brainwashing, liberal propaganda in schools and before we know if casual drug abuse will be widely culturally accepted (as it already is in certain sections of society).

It's all about what we want for our children and the future of our nations... liberal chaos and amorality, or sanity, safety and security.

Justifying Terrorism: Hague's Post-Bomb Regime Change Mantra

So terrorists (no doubt CIA led terrorists - that's state-sponsored terrorism isn't it?) have now killed four of, what the media are crowing are, President Assad's 'inner circle' and this - they also tell us, egged-on by hard line Zionists in Washington and London -means the regime is weakening and should change.

This would seem like not only a celebration of terrorism, but as an argument for regime-change by terrorism and the idea that terrorism is justified to bring about political change. A dangerous ploy just prior to the London 2012 Olympic Games!

Are people like William Hague really arguing that a terrorist bomb that would take out four Tory ministers (ministers backing the war in Afghanistan) would be justifiable? Would it usher in regime change? Would it mean that Westminster autocracy was crumbling? If Afghan patriots did it would people like Hague call it justified?

No? I didn't think so.

So why the hell are they gloating about (CIA led) terrorists in Syria?

Remember the British state also paid for and supplied munitions for terrorist attacks (by "Islamacists") in Libya against Gaddafi decades ago.

"The West" does not have clean hands. Our governments are still waging a clandestine war against any regimes they do not like. Yet they have the nerve to point the finger at such regimes who seek to defend themselves.

That's chutzpah. In every sense!

Nationalists should not be fooled. Afghanistan. Iraq. Libya. Syria. We are seeing Zionist terror tactics used against Arab peoples who pose us no threat whatsoever. None of it will end well.

Why is David Cameron Pushing "Gay Marriage?"

As it surely prepares to bring about "gay marriage" proving yet again where the loyalties of politicians lie, [in a report by the BBC] the Home Office said "all couples should have the choice of marriage."

Really? All couples?  So the little old lady sisters who live across the road? The old bachelor and his pet dog? What about the brother and sister who jointly inherited the house they share?

You think I'm being ridiculous eh? No moreso than those who think a couple of homo's should be able to be 'married!'

Right: An Indian marries a dog. How long before such a "loving relationship" happens here? We don't want to be racist. Mustn't we allow others to live and let live? Surely love is all that matters? Bigots should not be allowed to stop love.

The politicians have wrecked England through mass immigration. They have wrecked stability through attacks on marriage and the family. They have wrecked the economy through bailing out bankers and insistence on paying usury debt.

The truth is a minority of a minority (the militant activists amidst the 1% of active poofs), probably no more than 0.1 - 0.5% of the population, want marriage overturned and its very essence destroyed. The militant homosexuals ("milfags") say "the church doesn't own marriage" and they are right. Marriage was around before Christ instituted His church, indeed, Christ performed His first public miracle (water into wine) at the marriage feast at Cana. What the milfags overlook is that marriage (between one man and one woman) has been around for thousands of years. The church inherited it, made it into a sacrament, placed the very institution on a pedestal. They knew how important marriage was and is.

It has been around a long time for a very good reason. Empires have come and gone. Nations ceased to exist. Yet marriage has continued. Now, within a short time of saying they didn't want "gay marriage" (after getting civil partnerships) they want "gay marriage." These people are organised liars, they create falsehoods (the classic being 10% of people are poofs), organise the media to promote their falsehoods and then try to shoehorn public policy, knowing that most people might complain, but "Live with it" once it happens (and forget about it after umpteen Eastender plotlines and Sun editorials).

Gay marriage is an oxymoron. We have seen the results of previous assaults on marriage - a lawless society, generations of "I know my rights" ne'erdowells with no idea of duty, fidelity or the common good. Whole communities where fathers are a vague memory, where drug abuse is common and ASBOs are a badge of honour.

Do the politicians really think they are going to fix anything by giving in to the 0.1% milfags and downgrading marriage? If they allow "gay marriage" how long before the licentious nature of the poofs feeds through to rapid marriage-divorce-marriage-divorce proceedings that will make Elizabeth Taylor look like a one man gal. Moreover, how seriously are people going to treat marriage once it is equated with sodomites?

They have undermined marriage and now they wish to fatally wound it! We all know two wrongs do not make a right. You do not remedy years of liberal attacks on marriage by the most liberal possible attack on it! You fix marriage by undoing the liberal experiments that have damaged it.

Even if you don't give two figs about poofs, one has to wonder why on earth a government is pushing this agenda when neither party it is comprised of fought the election on "gay marriage," especially when there are so many real problems, from crime to poverty, taxation to unemployment, foreign wars to the price of gas, electricity and petrol. Is "gay marriage" really important to the vast majority of people after the mess the banks have put us in? Yet, just like NuLab before them, this government seems to find the money and time to endlessly promote faggotry.

The sad thing is that all the political parties, pay more heed to the milfags, who seem to hold sway over so many politicians and media-voices. We can only guess why. Institutionalised political correctness? The pink pound? Milfags in positions of power?

One thing's for sure. It is the duty of all patriots to expose the lies of the milfags and the traitor politicians who do their bidding.

BBC Exposes Special Forces Role in Libyan Rebellion

Tonight's Newsnight on BBC2 has detailed some of the "boots on the ground" missions of 'special forces' in Libya during its civil war/uprising.

One thing's for sure - the full extent of black ops and other special operations in Libya won't be exposed by the BBC, for fear of showing the world exactly who lead the rebellion, who gave the spearheads to the teams of rapists that descended on Tripoli, who lead the artillery which bombarded towns like Sirte (killing civilians!).

This is just the thin end of the wedge- nevertheless, it does show that the Tories, like NuLab before them have lied when it comes to overthrowing regimes it does not approve of.

When, if ever, will we find out about special ops in Syria to stir up the rebels there...

Immigration System is Bu##ered

Remember the recent brouhaha over the dodgy illegal immigrant who could stay in the UK?

Let me narrow it down for you - he was a South American of some stripe.

Still not there?

The gent in question owned a cat. It was part of his defence against expulsion. It proved he had a "family life".

Remember now?

Theresa May got into hot water for using him as an example of how pathetic our immigration policy is at the recent Tory Autumn conference (she nicked the facts from UKIP's Nigel Farrage who used the case in a speech to a UKIP conference).

You must recall the illegal immigrant now surely!

What the controlled media and party politicians didn't tell us at the time was that the illegal immigrant who proved his "family life" by the fact he had a cat was a fudge packer! His idea of "family life" is sodomy and buying a cat. Let's hope those two streams don't meet!

And the pc media covered this up, the pc judicial system gave him leave to stay.

How on earth can a sodomite with a cat possibly constitute a "family?" And how on earth can an illegal immigrant stay in the UK because he has a sodomitic boyfriend and a cat???

That's how mad the world is! What a farce.

Degenerate Moderns: The London 2012 Olympic Posters - the Best of British Art?

Degenerate Modern: Ruth Davidson - Tory & Homosexual.

In his seminal work Degenerate Moderns, American author E Michael Jones says that modern artists are a product of their dysfunctional personal lives, and especially their degenerate sexual activities. To break that down and over-simplify it we could say that pooftahs and the like make "art" that is filth. Their lives are mired in filth so their output is mired in filth. Simples.

Think of the BBC. The dumbing down. The soaps pushing faggotry. The news output that pushes 60s liberalism. Why are we surprised when so many pooftahs are involved in the BBC? Just yesterday a former-BBC bod, Ruth Davidson, was announced as the leader of the Scottish Tories, and the BBC news crowed that she was the "first openly gay party leader in the UK" as if this was a pivotal moment, a landmark for freedom, and something to be embraced.

In medialand it probably is, but in the real world where we struggle to pay bills, work every hour God sends and try to bring our kids up to know right from wrong, against a deluge of liberalism.

Martin Creed -- "Work No. 1023"

Was it coincidence then that the day the 'Gay Tory' took control of the Scottish Tories, that the posters for the London 2012 Olympics were unveiled? Ruth McKenzie, the leader of the Cultural Olympiad (sounds like a Soviet Commissar) defended the posters on yesterdays media - clearly used to the gushing praise from luvvies and shocked that so many "normal" people were saying "what the....?"

Ms McKenzie (she has to be a Ms!) is pictured above. Look at the people sponsoring this mess. BP, BT - all the usual big businesses pouring in their vast profits from people like us who can ill-afford their inflated bills. And their money goes to "art" that is just shite. Sorry, but I tried to be all high-brow, but it just pure unadulterated, absolute shite with few, if any, redeeming features.

Funnily enough, many of the great Degenerate Modern cultural events (one thinks of the crime-ridden Notting Hill Carnival or the various Gay Pride rallies where pooftahs illegally walk around with their backsides hanging out) could not take place without big business sponsors (and tax-payer money put in by councils) underpinning the loss-making events that 'celebrate' all that is wrong with Modern Britain.

Gary Hume -- "Capital"

The people 'celebrating' these new Olympic posters, the modern art promoters and collectors, do not live in the real world. They want to kid us that these child-like scribblings offer something "exciting" or "vibrant" or "enriching," the same buzz-words they use to inform us plebs that multi-racism is so beneficial to us! This from the people who only mix with rich 'coconut' ethnics (black on the outside, white on the inside), whose sole idea of "mixing it" with ethnics is which au pair they employ (isn't that a modern form of slavery?), which restaurants they go to, and pay Abdul at the 24-hour petrol station. You think that last one is far-fetched? Billy Bragg actually used that ('I get on great with the Asian at the local petrol station' or somesuch) to justify multi-racism when he lives in hideously White Dorset, not his native London (now very "native").

These people live in their one bubble of luvees, Guardianistas, Islington-types and suchlike whose idea of slumming-it is to fore go their Starbuck's Choca-Mocha Double Grande Vanilla Latte. They live in their gated communities or their white flight enclaves, and tell us that all the degenerate modern world has to offer from inner city London drugs gangs to the output of Tracey Emin is "enriching".

Sorry chaps but it isn't.

It is all soulless and degenerate. Since the 60s the world of art, politics, religion, culture, education, communities etc. etc. have all been ripped apart. The very soul of these building blocks of our society have had their innards ripped out by the Frankfurt School 'Degenerate Moderns' - the Commissars of the New Age.

I'm not saying everything was "perfect" before the 60s, because it so clearly was not, but the answer to that world was not the uber-liberalism of the 60s, which has delivered us a society wherein every gangsta knows their "rights" but so very few know their duties.

Ruth McKenzie of the "Cultural Olympiad" - Degenerate Modern?

The London riots were interesting insofar as it was possible, if only for a short time, that the world of the ganstas might infringe on the Degenerate Moderns... but whereas the police were content to stand back and watch the multi-culti gangstas rip apart the homes and businesses of 'ordinary' people in London, I wonder how fast they would have moved in (even with the army!) if the same rioters had marched on Westminster (or even worse - for them) Islington, Chiswick or Kensington and impinged on the 'bubble' of the likes of our political and cultural "leaders."

One thing is clear, yesterday's news output with its 'Gay Scottish Tory' and its Olympics Modern Art shows just how bad things have gotten in Modern Britain. Will it get even darker before the dawn?

Gay Tories are Wrecking Our Lives, Our Society, Our Traditions

Who's Yo Daddy? Answers on a Postcard

David Cameron says he is in favour of "gay marriage" (sic) because he is a Conservative. I assume he means Conservative with a big C, i.e. a member of the Tory political party, as he is certainly not a conservative in any meaningful sense.

What is he conserving? Certainly not marriage. Marriage is already in terminal decline thanks to divorce on demand, 60s liberalism, extra benefits for single parents (especially in-school mums getting council houses).

As marriage has crumbled, so society has worsened. We can say the rise in immigration and the slow death of Christianity plays its part too, but the headlong plummet of marriage as an institution has played the central role in society's demise.

So what will creating the oxymoronic "gay marriage" actually do? It will undoubtedly  weaken marriage itself, because it makes a mockery of marriage. Traditionally (I can hear liberals screaming!) marriage was undertaken for procreation. Marriage was the bedrock on which the family was built. You know - mum and dad, bringing up children to know right from wrong.

In a society where marriage is a "take it or leave it" where everyone has a "partner" (whether married for 50 years or a two week fling to be ditched at the next drink-fuelled night club evening) are we really surprised that there is no respect any more (and I don't mean in that negro-urban gun-totin' way which results in someone being shot by an Uzi for treading on someone's toe)?

We do not respect our ancient traditions. Marriage is an empty husk in many communities. Kids have no dad, or a plethora of "dad" stand-ins. Now we are to see the "partnership" of buggery, the sterility of dykedom, put on a level pegging with the sanctity of marriage with the procreation of children.

No wonder society is falling apart!

Cameron knows that he is sticking the knife in on a Tradition that is as old as the hills. He knows this will not help society in any way.

But he has his masters to obey. The pink pound will flow into Tory coffers. The "nasty party" image will be blurred by media-luvvies who approve in their simpering way. His Lodge membership will be advanced.

We are witnessing the knife being plunged into the heart of this land, of our traditions, and the sanctity of marriage by a Rothschild hireling traitor who was born into obscene wealth and will always have obscene wealth.

The chattering classes will approve. The media will approve.

Yet who wants this? There is no popular clamour for this.

• There is popular clamour for an end to needless wars -- yet we bomb Libya.
• There is popular clamour for a vote on the EU, yet we will remain members.
• There is popular clamour for action against the utility companies who overcharge.
• There is popular clamour for action against the banks who have delivered ruination.

Yet the Tories go against popular wishes, citing lack of time, or of the economy being "more important" than these "side issues."

So how come they ignore all these vital matters, yet still find time for yet another law giving the minuscule homosexual lobby everything they ask for?

To ask the question is to instinctively know the answer.

Needless Zionist war. Stupid pro-homosexual laws. Bankers bailed out and protected. EU membership protected.

It's not so much David Cameron, as Blairbot 2.0, and it is us, the poor working plebs of the land who are being shat upon from a great height for the umpteenth year!

Lost your job? Child killed in a needless war? Business closed down? Can't afford to heat and eat?

Never mind! At least we can see some poofs getting "married" in and on the media.

What a @#+#ing joke!

Tory MP Urges Crackdown on Churches that Refuse "Gay Weddings"

A gay couple, Mike and Dave. Well, they look happy

How quick we have moved, or rather have been pushed, as a society.

It doesn't take long does it for the usual degenerate anti-Christian, anti-family agenda to come to the fore.

Now a Tory MP, Mike Weatherley MP for Hove, wants Churches that refuse to do "gay weddings" (whatever the HELL they are!) to face a crackdown from the State.

Dear God in heaven! Just 15 years ago you would have thought such a thing would be the plot from a book about the advent of the Anti-Christ.

Will "Call me Dave" Cameron brush this aside to look like a "pretty straight kinda guy" [copyright T. Blair] whilst he pushes through yet more pro-homosexual laws? Seems likely. So Cameron looks like he's pro-family and decent, whilst a Brighton area MP picks up more pooftah votes.

Kerching.

As sections of the BBC push "BCE/CE" instead of BC/AD for years as a way to undermine our Christian culture (stupid really as BCE and CE - [Before] Common Era, both take their cut-off point as the birth of Christ) we shouldn't be that surprised.

The BBC hope that be enforcing BCE and CE in more places it will become more widely used, like the accursed "partner" has replaced spouse/husband/wife/fiancee/girlfriend/boyfriend/casual sexual partner/menage a trois/tree with a weird shaped hole in it.

Our culture is being eroded, by the BBC, by mass immigration and by the laws pushed by Rotshchild-rent-boy politicians.

Traitors.

If this MP ever got his way we would be like the Scots in Braveheart being married in the woods, or the Irish in Elizabethan penal times, attending Mass in the wilderness. Given the choice between the "official" State-sanctioned Church (as in the USSR or today's China) or the underground Church that remains loyal to Church teachings, we would have no choice!

Buggered if I'll go to a "gay wedding" church.


Link:
MP Calls for Licence Removal

More Zionist War, More Homosexual 'Rights', It's NuLab 2.0

The Rothschilds create money so buy politicians

Like NuLab before them there seem to be two preoccupations with the ConDem government. As with Blair, so with Cameron (Blair 2.0)

They are:

• The onwards march of the Neo-Con/Rothschild agenda via unjust wars.
• The onwards march of the liberal/Masonic agenda via the promotion of homosexual "rights."

It seems bizarre (or would do if we didn't know the real agenda of, and the matters of real importance to, this and previous governments) that Cameron, like Blair, would waste so much time and money on these two prongs of government policy, when that time, effort and money could be used to help those battling to make ends meet following the tax-payers' multi-billion pound bail-out of the banks.

• Do unjust, highly questionable and morally bankrupt foreign wars help those who have lost jobs?
• Do more highly questionable "laws" promoting the agenda of the morally bankrupt pink lobby help those whose businesses are teetering on bankruptcy?
• Does spending billions on yet more overseas Rothschild 'adventures' help OAPs struggling to pay heating bills?
• Does wasting parliamentary time on yet another "law" to promote sodomy help workers who have to choose between paying bills or buying food?

It is my view that the Neo Con and homosexual agendas show where the loyalties, interests and perceived duties of the politicians lie.

In a recent article I was reading it described the politicians as the rent boys of international finance. This seems so apt, on so many levels!

Another quote I read from a Rothschild matriarch many, many years ago went along the lines of "If the Rothschilds didn't want any wars, there would be no wars."

Remember these people own a huge bulk of the world's wealth (I read a recent estimation that it was half), that they can buy, bribe, cajole and bankroll all the political rent-boys they want, and that is why we have had so many dodgy wars, justified in the most ridiculous ways, and so many laws promoting homosexuality - hardly a matter of national importance.

When our government should be protecting our people from rapacious usury, when our government should be putting money into helping crumbling communities, and when our government should be using parliamentary time to remedy so many social ills and economic woes - we must ask why they are pushing for needless, unjust wars and so many pro-homosexual laws.

In a week when alleged cocaine usage by a very senior member of the government is being touted by a call-girl, it is not wrong for many of us to ask why those with so many peccadilloes, with so little backbone, and with such a willingness to go gung ho for an agenda that undermines the good that is left in Britain, are the ones leading our country.

Their subservience to the bankers, the Neo Con war-machine, the pink lobby, the Israeli lobby... shows where their loyalties lie.

Just this week news leaked out that the British state has tweaked the rules so Israeli war criminals can now come to the UK without fear of being arrested.

Do you still think we live in a "democracy" -- or an oligarchy that does what is told by the Rothschild elite and their hirelings?

Various Nu Lab people used to say that the most important role for a government is to protect its people, as they led us into expensive, illegal wars. Yet what protection do any of the hirelings and rent boys offer us from the bankers, the war machine, the tidal wave of drugs and the homosexual agenda?

Very little.

And so the rot continues. Not in spite of the government, but because of the government.

Shocking Pic of David Cameron's NF Past

Entering tabloid media mode:

Yes! Shock Horror!

It's David "Call me Dave" Cameron's secret "Nazi" past.

Whilst other Tories were buggering each other before Monday Club meetings, or pocketing thousands via lucrative bank placements and non-executive roles in arms manufacturers before voting for wars, Mr. Cameron was known as "Nazi Dave" down the Fleece n Ferkin, Smethwick.

"Oh yeah," recalls the old landlord Steve Bloke "He'd come in here giving it large, doing 'Itler salutes and suchlike, saying as how all them black fellas needs to shove off 'ome. Fair upset Leroy off of the darts team. Now can I have that tenner?"

His headmaster, Gerald Huffington-Poshly, has vivid memories: "Damn and blast his eyes. Cameron Junior had his whole life ahead of him. He could play a decent round of polo, and was a half-decent fag for that Rothschild chappy, then he blew it all by getting with these oiks and turning up for classes with a false toothbrush moustache. By Jupiter, what a daft cove. Terribly upset young Crown Prince Leroy from Zimboozooland (formerly Rumbababawe)."

A close friend of Mr Cameron's, Stanley Madeupname, said "This will rock the government to its foundations. Thank Allah we have the Daily Moron to bring us the truth."

More tomorrow in your super soaraway Daily Moron.

Blue Labour or Red Tories: Washing Powder Politics for the NWO

Blue Labour or New Labour: No Real Difference

Maurice (Lord) Glasman has created Blue Labour. Just like Peter Mandelson (now also a Lord) created New Labour. Just as their kindred across the pond were perfecting the metamorphosis from Socialist Left to Neo Con Right, in order to win power for the Israeli Lobby. It's all very Khazarite isn't it?

We are being told this is something "new" but like the 'Red Tories' this is just political party operators trying to co-opt the "centre ground."

All we are getting is Capitalism with "Gay Rights" whether it's under the Tories with their Liberal hangers-on, or under New/Blue Labour.

THERE IS NO CHOICE.

The same multi-nationals, bankers and Masons rule the roost, and the parties of choice push the same lines, just tweaked differently. We will get more 'gay rights'. We will get liberalisation of drugs laws. We will get assisted suicide.

The 60s liberal/Marxist agenda marches on.

And once these liberal laws are passed (as with the capital punishment repeal, mass abortion and homosexual legalisation) they will not be repealed by this bunch of no-marks for hire.

Welcome to the "free world." Where we vote (or 35% of us vote) to keep out some other party, so we end up with a ruling party that has way less than 10% actual support. Those politicians are in the pockets of party machinery controlled by big money.

This is not a democracy. It's an oligarchy.

Lord Glasman knows that. Oy Vey! But he wants his brand at the top instead of Brand X (Red Tories? Big Society Tories? blah blah).

Red Tories: Gay-Friendly Capitalism

It's like a battle between competing Unilever brands of washing-machine powder. Oh this one is in a red box with blue patterns, and this one is a blue box with red patterns. And look! The adverts tell us that Brand X is "better than ever before, it gets out all the stains" (as they show us a before and after with mud-caked football kit replaced by a brand new one with a heavenly ethereal shine courtesy of back-lighting).

And the dumbos go out to buy the "better than ever" Brand X that replaces the "better than ever" Brand Z that they were promised would wash clean last year, but never really did.

This is politics courtesy of the New World Order.

Meanwhile we all pay our taxes which mostly go into the pockets of the international financiers and multi-national big businesses.

As a Mr. Donaldson once intoned: Freedom, What Freedom?

Here We Go Again: Another War to get Embroiled in

When is a no fly zone not a no fly zone?

When it is yet another needless Zionist War by another name.

We are told we don't have enough money for old peoples' homes, for local libraries, and so much more.

Yet we have enough money to launch planes and Tomahawk missiles against Libya (which must be costing many millions).

The War Hawks have picked another victim.

• It's not Israel who used white phosphorous against civilian targets.
• It's not Bahrain or Saudi Arabia who used the military against unarmed civilians.

What is interesting now is what happens next:

• Will the war (for bombing a sovereign country is an act of war) escalate?
• Will the armed rebellion continue - and if so are the Libyan forces not allowed to counter?
• Will Gaddafy spill the beans on the alleged bankrolling of Sarkozy?

Furthermore, where does this leave 'the world' beyond the example of Libya and the rather eccentric Gaddafys?

If Russia uses military muscle against armed Chechen rebels (as they have) will that mean Britain, France and America have the right to attack strategic Russian targets?

Or let us look at a more extreme example right here.

Social cohesion breaks down and civil unrest happen in Britain over the cut-backs. Scotland is especially riotous given the Tory government and there is open insurrection. Parts of Scotland are armed by Irish Republican splinter groups, and there is tit for tat sectarianism. The socialists and republicans of Scotland start an all out paramilitary campaign against "British" targets and a minor Royal is killed on a Scottish estate by a servant.

In English cities the unrest spreads, pushed on by far-left militants, and many coloureds take part to air their own grievances. Some Muslim-dominated areas join in to fight the government. In some white working class areas even radical patriots declare "home rule" to defend their communities from roving criminals and corrupt left-wing councils. In the chaos bands of students and ex-students take it upon themselves to attack banks, robbing them, burning whatever records they can find.

Even where riots and disturbances don't break out, there is a run on the banks as people panic, the shops empty, armed police patrol and the army is on standby.

With many of these disparate forces (Scots, leftists, Irish republicans, coloureds, Muslims etc.) joining up in a (very) loose confederation, based on the examples of Egypt, Libya etc., they begin taking over more areas,more towns.

A shocking image in the newspapers is that of "state agents/provocateurs" being strung up or burnt alive in the manner of the South African burning tyre "necklaces."

The rebels clamour for the end of Tory/Liberal/Labour government and call for some form of government open to people and free from party corruption and vested interests (the Scots and Irish elements want some form of increased home rule).

With violence, the call for the splintering of the UK, the army is sent in and many civilians (some armed, some not) are killed. Despite the intense violence it is clear in the rebel-held areas most people are not taking part, the TV film shows crowds of a few thousand at most.

If this happened do you think Russia, China, Japan and others have the right to declare a no-fly zone? Do you think they should have the right to launch missiles at "strategic targets?"

Now I know this is an extreme example; but as nationalists we should always worry when the "international community" gives itself the right to attack a sovereign nation when some form of civil war or civil unrest breaks out.

We must be very careful before giving credence to the usual suspects starting a war.

Some will try to paint Gadaffy as a "mad mullah" - as opposed to a latter-day friend of 'the West' - but be careful what you wish for: the opposition is an unknown commodity and as well as the usual CIA and Mossad plants, will undoubtedly contain those who want an Islamic State.

As for Gadaffy himself, he must be kicking himself that he didn't drop white phosphorous on Benghazi, as that's what the Israelis did and the "international community" barely uttered a word!

Here endeth the lesson.

Tolerance for Turks - But Decapitation 'Back Home'

Tolerance is a joke: it means we must accept all that is wrong and against the family (like degenerate homosexuality, its drug-culture and its death-culture), all that is alien to our European Christian civilisation, and all that destroys the future of our children, denying them the White, European, Christian nationhood and cultures that our forefathers enjoyed.

We have St Stephen Lawrence, raised on high for us all to feel guilty about, yet Kriss Donald the Scottish lad who was stabbed repeatedly and set on fire for being White by an Asian gang, is barely known outside of Glasgow.

Right: Imran Shahid, the murderer of Kriss Donald expresses his remorse: not.

This is the hypocrisy of the media!

Our people count for nothing! Our heritage counts for nothing. Our cultures count for nothing.

The family is under constant attack. Homosexuals and drug users (George Michael, Elton John, Boy George, Stephen Fry etc. etc.) are lauded by a sick media, appearing time and time again as role models, yet if you dare to question the benefits of multi-culti in even the slightest way you will be ostracised and lose your media job (Carol Thatcher and Brian True-May).

Our Christian heritage is attacked by left-wing councils with their humanist, atheist agenda and by a government and system so intent on passing law after law after law giving ever more "rights" to degenerate sodomites, they have forced the shut-down of Catholic adoption agencies and are even stopping Owen and Eunice Johns (a black couple) from fostering children between the ages of 5 and 8, because the couple oppose homosexuality!

In the age of Elton John and David Furnesh having an (IVF) "gayby" on Christmas Day (oh happy chance!) which the media gushed over as if it were the Second Coming with barely a contrary word spoken, we have to wonder what the hell this country is coming to.

If you are White, heterosexual, Christian and part of a traditional family it seems that you, as far as the media and the government are concerned, have no rights.

I remember when the Tories promoted the idea of giving a tax break to married couples (don't get too excited, it would doubtless include homosexuals) and the Labour politicians were up in arms that "x" pounds a week would not make people get married, not keep a marriage together if it were about to break.

Yet the same politicians see nothing wrong in giving financial inducements to couples to make them live apart, or to have them cohabit and not get married, never mind the whole con that is young single mums getting homes, benefits etc. when they should still be living with their parents, going to school etc. (and don't say the system isn't abused because everyone knows that it is) whilst the married couples obey the rules and pay the taxes that go to the single mums, the immigrants fresh off the planes, and the fat cat bankers who wrecked the economy and are already on the bonus gravy train with barely a gap in the money-grubbing.

It's the same old story isn't it?

Peter Hitchens was on the BBC's 'This Week' recently calling for policemen to be on the beat again, preventing crime, making the streets safe, acting like public servants, instead of rushing around in speeding cars to mop up after-the-fact, being tooled up like paramilitaries, and treating the public as a nuisance.

How right he was.

It's the same mentality again. We live in a society where crime is so endemic much of it just doesn't get reported any more. If you are burgled you get a crime reference number for the insurers and little more. Unless your name is Tony Blair or Elizabeth Regina, don't expect the scenes of crime squad dusting for finger prints. meanwhile mums doing 34mph on a deserted road at 10.30 in the morning get clocked and fined.

Criminals are just so much hard work, busy mums struggling to make ends meet are an easy target.

It's just another aspect of our society that is out of kilter.

If only we had a politician like that Austrian in the you tube clip - prepared to speak out, defend our rights, call a spade a spade.

At the moment even the patriotic movement here is imploding with tales of granny-porn stars, British businesses owed monies (in this economic climate!) whilst degenerates are employed on some gravy train scam.

The people who should be making a difference and exposing the corruption, the rampant usury, the con this is multi-culturalism, the non-European wrecks that are our cities, the out of control pink mafia - and much more, are the ones embroiled in degeneracy, expenses fiddling and all the sleaze we expect from bankers, MPs, and media-stars.

Things don't look good.

"Tolerance" is on the march and wiping out all before it. Will anyone make a stand for decency, for the family, for the tax-payers, for the Christians, for the poor bloody people who make up the bulk of the normal, White workers of these island nations?

Libya: More Hypocrisy from Cameron (and Rifkind)

On last night's news Cameron our non-chosen PM was said to be calling for military intervention in Libya, no-fly zone as a starter. Others including the Tory Zionist Malcolm Rifkind have called for the Libyan rebels to be armed - in short, that we should be seen to enter a civil war, uprising, call it what you will on one side.

Right: Malcolm Rifkind wants us to arm the rebels. No, not Irish rebels. No, not Palestinian rebels. No, not Bahraini or Saudi rebels. Just the Libyan ones.

Isn't that what the British media point the finger at re. Gaddafy arming the IRA? Whilst we were giving explosives, arms etc. to Muslim groups in Libya (and Afghanistan and probably quite a few others) to murder politicians, soldiers and civilians alike, Gaddafy was sending arms to Ireland.

When is backing terrorism not backing terrorism? When the British State does it?

So now we have high-ranking Tories acting like Neo Con war hawks (just as they would have aped Blair's actions had they been in power when George Dubya Bush was - no matter how much they tried to feign otherwise after the fact).

Funnily enough they are not calling for the Bahraini rebels to be armed, even as the Saudi dictators send in armed forces.

If Gadaffy had called in the organised, armed forces of a neighbour (a corrupt dictatorship at that) can you imagine Cameron's response? He'd pop a fuse.

Yet because the corrupt Saudis and the corrupt Bahraini's are "on our side" a blind eye is turned.

When circa 1 million Rwandans were wiped out (not to mention the rapes and mutilations) just a few years ago, Britain did nothing. And they accuse us of being racists? Bahrain sends in Saudi armed forces to attack civilians. Britain does nothing. Let's not even mention Robert Mugabe.

Not only are the British State hypocrites for arming terrorists when it suits their aims (and crying when others do it against them), but they are hypocrites now for clamouring for action against Libya; because when Israel drops white phosphorous on civilians or when the Saudis sent the military into a neighbour to crush civilian protests, the British State does not seek no fly zones or to arm the insurrectionists there.

Once upon a time people talked of joined-up-government and didn't Robin Cook try to implement an ethical foreign policy (probably for a couple of hours until Blair steam-rollered it)?

If the British State gets involved in Libya, no matter the degree, the Palestinians and the Bahrainis will ask "why not us?" with good reason. Not to mention the haunted souls of the dead Rwandans calling "is it cos we is black?"

Blair killed joined-up-government and executed the idea of an ethical foreign policy. Is Mr. Cameron now about to lay them in a lead-lined coffin at the bottom of the Marianas Trench?

Government Want Full-On Homosexual 'Marriage'

Here we go again!

Or if we allow emotion to rule the heart, here we f###### go again!

New Labour wasted hours and hours promoting the sodomite agenda.

Now with the country falling apart around our ears, the Lib-Con govt is going to spend more time pushing the sodomite agenda.

No wonder we are in such a mess.

We can also, through this story, see two important things:

• The system's agenda has ALWAYS been for homosexual "weddings." They are not interested in civil partnerships. That's just softly, softly catchee monkey cobblers that all treacherous, profiteering, nepotistic bastards use to try and fool all the people all the time. They WANT full-blooded faggot "weddings" so the pooves are "totally equal."
• Peter Tatchell, the apologist for a paedophile agenda, is still the mouthpiece for the homosexual agenda. This shows us where we are headed. The homosexual agenda is a sick agenda. It will promote disease and death. It will promote drug use and abuse. It will promote sexual deviancy in private and public. It will lead to laws being ignored by the police and eventually overturned (especially viz public decency). It will lead to sexual acts with minors being gradually lowered.

Think I'm being hysterical? Go back to the 50s, 60s and even 70s and ask the public what they thought.

The media and government have promoted a sodomite, homosexual, degenerate agenda.

No wonder deviancy and drug usage is rampant in the media (and not far behind in parliament, the city etc.).

NATIONALISM MUST OPPOSE THIS AGENDA.

We must show we are different. We must show we are decent. We must show we oppose the homosexual, deviant agenda and their druggie cohorts.

Not to do so is to surrender our lands to moral anarchy.

BBC: Govt to All Homosexual Church "Weddings"

David Cameron Apes BNP Policy: More Integration

David Cameron has spoken out against multi-culturalism.

Hooray? No, not at all.

The "we're in it altogether" squillionaire is not about to denounce mass immigration, the loss of indigenous culture or the fact that Europeans will be a minority in these islands in a few decades: a terrible legacy of Tory and Labour misrule.

No. Perish the thought that he would do anything honourable.

He is a traitor. He is a Zionist. He will one day walk away and work for the banks (like Blair and Mandelson before him). He is part of the problem.

Now he is aping BNP policy.

Yes. BNP policy.

Multi-culti is wrong. We all know that. It has been the elephant in the room for decades past. But the parties and media closed off any genuine discussion of it.

But to do what Cameron is doing, and what the BNP has been proposing, is racial genocide and will further wreck our lands.

He, like the BNP, is calling for an end to multi-culturalism (they are using he term as a kind of racial/cultural apartheid) and for it to be replaced by integration!

Yes, rejoice all you racial nationalists! Your cause was taken over years ago by idiots who, to get a few votes and Brussels placements, started courting non-Muslim support and saying how great it is that Blacks, Hindus etc. integrate, but how Muslims are the problem because they don't integrate.

Now it will be government policy. The BNP can disband! Their job is done!

Now we will have Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus and coloureds mixing in with our kids whether we -or they - want it or not!

Right: A successful model of integration.

With increased integration we will lose more of our identity and the coloureds can further argue that they too are "British."

Those happy photos in BNP papers and on BNP websites of British Whites hugging British coloureds and Asians has now been writ large.

Years ago we attacked the BNP for saying blacks were "British" whilst they attacked White Polish migrants (would you rather your daughter marry a Pole or Latvian? Or an African or Asian?).

This has now come full circle.

It is we, the peoples of Britain who will suffer. The rich, like Cameron, can move away from immigrants. Their idea of integration is what culture their au pair or cleaner comes from, which restaurant they will eat in, or (like Billy Bragg!) how well they get on with the petrol station attendant!

I have lived in heavily Asian areas, and it is not fun.

The policy of dispersal will make more race-mixing possible, will make a bad situation worse as vast numbers of non-Europeans move into more areas, more schools etc. etc. to be followed by the growing numbers of Somalis, Afghanis and other non-Whites still flooding in, no doubt to be dispersed to help integrate.

I hope the idiots in the BNP leadership who pushed their integrationist agenda years ago, just like they pushed their quasi-Zionist "it's all the Muzzies fault" line, are happy.

The chickens - of all shades and colours! - are coming home to roost.

RIP White Britain.

Osborne: Target the Bankers before the Dole Bums

The Chancellor of 'our' government, George Osborne, is targeting dole bums.

Right: Nat Rothschild is No. 2, George Osborne is No. 7 in Bullingdon Club pose. How worrying for everyone that Osborne is wearing the most foppish attire of them all!

As soon as I heard this it reminded me of one of the best books I have read delineating a Nationalist worldview. It was written by the Irish pro-lifer Justin Barrett, and is called The National Way Forward.

Albeit, from an Irish perspective, the book tackled many political problems we face across many states and nations in Europe.

One of the key things that stuck in my mind was how Barrett explained how the government (of Ireland -- but this is true of the UK, USA etc.) was in hock to the international bankers and financiers, yet instead of tackling usury debt they would go for the small fry -- i.e. dole bums.

No one denies that there are dole bums, this subclass do exist, in Ireland, Britain and elsewhere, but the point is that whilst it is wrong for anyone to live on what was supposed to be a 'safety net' for the working man, the real criminals are the bankers.

Billions, if not trillions, are poured into the endless black hole of the national debt (regardless of credit crunch, crashes etc.) but the government will never act against the real criminals, because they are the same breed, they went to the same schools, they leave office to work for them, the bankers pay their political office costs, etc.

Now, in the shadow of a crisis created wholly and solely by the banks, George Osborne, pal of the Rothschilds, targets... dole bums.

By all means target them, Mr. Osborne: but do not do it to take our eyes from the truth.

The New Unhappy Lords, with their "bright dead alien eyes" have delivered us into penury, into debt slavery, and thrown hundreds of thousands of working men onto the dole in Ireland, Britain, America etc. etc.

George Osborne will end his time in government four, nine or however many years from now and walk into a job with one of the bankers that have caused this mess, because whilst in office he has been their poodle.

Rather than protect the workingmen of this country, by making us self-sufficient and free of usury-debt, Mr. Osborne continues our slavery, continues raising taxes and slashing services to pay off his banking buddies.

They are the real criminals!

They have given us into the hands of the new unhappy lords,
Lords without anger and honour, who dare not carry their swords.
They fight by shuffling papers; they have bright dead alien eyes;
They look at our labour and laughter as a tired man looks at flies.
from The Secret People by GK Chesterton.