Iraqi Family Shot in France: Military Intelligence Hit Job?

Does anyone really think that the killing of an Iraqi family on holiday in France was a "family dispute?"

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO - read British spooks) started pushing the line that it was a family dispute almost immediately (shades of JFK there).

To my unprofessional eye this looks like a hit job that was disturbed. The spooks have been known to use third parties to carry out hits from a distance (such as Islamic terrorists against Qaddafi many years ago, or even organised crime outfits). There may even have been a crossover with the CIA or Mossad - for whatever reason.

There is clearly much more to this than meets the eye.

French Mercenaries Captured in Syria

French mercenaries - French sources for the arms. Surely this is an act of war against a sovereign state with no UN Resolution/backing and so a war crime?

No wonder the Zionist Sarkozy is one of the least popular French leaders ever! He has fomented armed rebellion and terrorism for his paymasters in Israel, certainly not for the betterment of the French people whose economic plight is similar to our own, even slightly worse being inside the dreaded Euroland.

Are You For or Against a Corrupt Zionist Regime?

Have a look at this great montage. Again it shows the hypocrisy of "the West" - i.e. the political and media class.

The last time I made a comparison between the (Real) IRA and the Syrian insurrectionists, and the treatment of them by the BBC (chalk and cheese) when they shoot soldiers, I had one or two dullards and/or nonces stirring up quite the hornet's nest on here.

So, just to let you know, I am not an anarchist any more than I am an Islamist (or "democrat") Arab insurrectionist. I know, I know... but you'd be amazed at what trolls, idiots and numpties will read into a post!

Of course - the rioters in Cairo were fighting against a Zionist puppet regime that had acted against the interests of the indigenous people for decades... whereas in England we have... a 'democracy.' Mwah ha ha!

The BBC treated Irish and Syrian armed gangs who shoot soldiers, policemen etc, quite differently; they also treat those who riot against governments controlled by vested interests quite differently.

As always (e.g. when dealing with Libya or Saudi Arabia ruling families, Iran or Israel's nuclear realities, Serbian or American 'war crimes') the BBC twists the news to fit a specifically British State agenda, and to pretend otherwise is ridiculous. As our state is Zionist (i.e. in the pockets of Masonic bankers/financiers and hardline pro-Israel) the litmus test seems to be whether a regime is pro-Israeli or Israel-tolerant. Of course in international diplomacy nothing is so straightforward. France, for example has gone from "bad" to "good" under Sarkozy (I wonder why) from a regime which tended to oppose Zionist wars to one which is far more in favour of them (it is highly questionable that the French people changed that much!)

That some British nationalists (still!) worship the Westminster State and are still following certain paths and herded in certain pens, thanks to years of brainwashing and State propaganda speaks volumes. The blinkers still aren't off. And so we see a "hurrah" for 'plucky' David Cameron who stands up to the Euro Beast... to defend the rights of financiers in the City of London, who in turn show little or no loyalty to the UK (always threatening to leave these shores if taxes are raised, for example)

The plastic patriots who cheered on 'Call me Dave' Cameron used to be the Imperialists, who cheered as Britain planted flags in India, Africa, and even in Calais and Gibraltar (but who would go to war if Spain or France claimed the Isle of Wight). Of course, they were too dumb to realise that eventually the Indians and Africans would return the favour and colonise us - now they want to claim as a right what their political forebears denied the Indians and Africans -- independence, nationalism and their own country run by their own kind.

The jingoism of Empire was in reality a form of multi-culturalism which celebrated money, profits and greed above all else. There was little or no altruism, no seeking what was best for "us" or "them." The British (unlike for example the Spaniards) did not even have the good grace to convert the heathens. Speaking to an Indian (Hindu) on a train recently he told me that most Christians in India are Catholic, with one small area also Methodist (after a Methodist missionary went there). The impact of Anglicanism, given that England ran India for so many years, was minimal indeed. Just imagine (and this is pure conjecture of course and not seen as the be-all and end-all) an India and Pakistan that was converted to a form of Christianity, instead of just bled dry and turned against each other as Britain sought to 'divide and rule' with Muslims and Hindus.

We might even have no nuclear powers playing tit for tat wars with each other, and no Muslim stronghold (used by the CIA and its enemies) to "export terror" as and when needed. Or look at Japan, which was on the verge of becoming Christian thanks to missionaries from Mediterranean lands. It was Dutch and English traders who persuaded the Japanese rulers who weren't Christian (about half) that this was some kind of threat from Portugal or Spain which would then "take over" and so Christians were massacred, crucified en masse, and often mutilated by having their feet cut off. It was the money-men of Amsterdam and London who stopped Japan becoming Christian... imagine the impact in WW2? History may have been so different. It may even have impacted on China, preventing the rise of Communism... who knows?

It was money and profits that drove the British Empire, and it was (as usual!) GK Chesterton who saw the future problems this early globalism would bring. I found this interesting text/review online, about an essay on Patriotism by GKC. It is so good I would urge everyone to read it two or three times and to keep a copy for future reference:

There is, however, another enemy of Patriotism and Nationalism. It is equipped with power and wealth and a good chance of success in practical politics and it is but the disguise of cosmopolitanism. It is Imperialism, or as we would say, 'Globalism'. In Chesterton's opinion the Empire was neither for the benefit nor the glory of the English, it was for their exploitation. We had been put to work, to suffer, to bleed and to die, for the benefit of international banking and trade, that is, 'Globalism', and when we had served our purpose the assets would be stripped and lodged elsewhere. The price of such glory as we might enjoy from seeing the map painted red, was our impoverishment, our deculturation, our mongrelization, our destruction as a Nation. Chesterton presented this succinctly in 'The Flying Inn'(1904) "Did you ever hear the great destiny of Empire? It is in four acts: Victory over barbarians. Employment of barbarians. Alliance with barbarians. Conquest by barbarians. That is the great destiny of Empire."

GK Chesterton saw mass immigration into Britain decades before it happened, whilst the ideological forebears of today's plastic patriots, Westminster State worshippers to  a man, were singing God Save the King, down with the Frenchies/Krauts (delete as applicable) in short, much as most of them still do today!

They sung/sing a hymn to a Queen who has rubber stamped laws on homosexuality, abortion and divorce (and mass immigration/anti-racislism!) that have ripped this country apart. She swore to be a Christian Monarch on her accession to the throne, an oath she swore to God; but just as the wedding oaths sworn by so many, it was meaningless - as their weddings were dissolved by man, might we wonder if her monarchy should be dissolved by man? How can a Christian Monarch pass laws as she has? She even made the architect of the 1967 Abortion Law (which resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent Britons) a Lord!!! How preposterous is that? ...and we have Charles "defender of (multi-)faiths" waiting in the side-lines.

If Elizabeth II had an ounce of decency she would have stepped down as monarch, or stood firm to uphold her oath. This, I believe, is the basic argument of much of the Lawful Rebellion crowd. If the crown is void (a kind of British 'sede vacante' - vacant seat - position if you will) then when we enter the courts controlled by the crown, they have lost the authority to judge us. If we do not recognise the crown as legitimate, having broken the Coronation Oath (as usury, abortion and homosexuality to name but three, are anti-Christian), then it has no right to levy taxes on us -- for its illegal wars, its pro-queer bodies, its abortion-performing structures and for its repayments on usury debts.

But let us return to nationhood. GKC once said that the patriot loves his country, whereas an imperialist wants to invade his neighbours. I said in a recent post that WW2's very basis was flawed given that we were conned into taking part in a war that was for the freedom of Poland, but resulted in handing over the entirety of Poland to one of the very powers that had invaded it in September 1939 (but which bizarrely we did not declare war on!): the USSR.

For me, one of the faults with National Socialist Germany was that it was, at its very core imperialist. The Reich was to expand. Austria was a fascist country with a superb economic basis on which it was building structures for the Common God that were building a socially strong and confident Austria. Even Poland was nationalist and had stood up to Soviet Communism. Today it would be painted by liberals as "fascist." The sad fact is that both these countries were taken over by a Germany whose very basis was imperial growth. It was its imperialism rather than any perceived "fascism" or "socialism" that proved its downfall.

"Chesterton’s distaste for state socialism, his suspicion of monopoly capitalism, and his support for the independence from imperial domination of small nations like Poland..."

from the GK Chesterton Society's conference 2011 blurb

As nationalists, we must be nationalists! This is the basis of this rather meandering post. We must stand up for our own nation. We must not be imperialists, we do not want or need empires. We must realise that we love our nation(s), but that does not mean we must worship the state. We must disassociate worship of the Westminster State from love of nation.

This is a debate that nationalists need to have, especially in light of devolution, a monarch and state that are promoting homosexuality and abortion, the collapse of the Euro and the ongoing take-over of our lands by non-Europeans, which the state is defending to the detriment of our people!

Regardless of the permutations in the arguments that fly back and forth, the one thing that we have to realise above all else is that as nationalists today, the state that rules over us, which has promoted multi-racism, destroyed Christianity, pulled apart the family, promoted illegal Zionist wars, and pushes its twisted propaganda as news on the BBC, is not "ours" - it is not British, English or whatever - it is in the pockets of financiers with no national loyalty, it is bought and paid for by the men who rule the Lodges who wreck our lives, yet it expects our loyalty too??? We'd have to be mad!

That is the British State as it stands, that is why we owe it no loyalty. It, the Queen, her governments and the Lodges behind them all, have betrayed the peoples of these isles on every single imaginable level. The law is not only an ass, but a law that breaks almost every single moral law (from deadening usury, to sterile homosexuality, to the multi-racism that destroys, to the mass death of abortion), has to make us realise that we are living under a regime that has sold us and our children into perpetual slavery, taxation-debt and degeneracy.

That's why, when I see an anarchist bashing a police van in London, whether it is a demo over student loans, big brother or against another war -- despite the fact that he may need a "damn good wash" (copyright 1970s NF) and support more than a few dubious causes -- I see very little difference between those demonstrating against a corrupt, pro-Israeli regime in the pockets of the money-men, who treat the indigenous people like crap; and the demonstrators in Cairo.

Workers of the World Unite - You Need More Slavery & Bosses

1898 artwork by Caran D'Ache

This artwork is very interesting.

In the first picture the worker is under the weight of the monarchy/rich.

Interestingly we see the Church in the background. Today of course Communists (founded and egged on by Anti-Christ Talmudics) and atheists (ditto) say the Church suppressed the workers on behalf of the rich.

As anyone who has studied history and Church teaching knows, the Church acted as Europe's conscience, pushing the rich to give alms to the poor. The church provided hospitals for the sick and infirm, provided peppercorn rents for workers (who would, post-Reformation be thrown of the land, which the uncontrolled rich enclosed*)

Just as things worsened for the poor after the Reformation, when the King, monarchy and rich were no longer controlled by the Church and its laws,  so after the French Revolution they worsened considerably.

In D'Ache's picture we see the Royalty replaced by the bankers, Freemasons and rich; whilst their daily toil did not improve or worsened under the weight of the new elites.

This is the reality. The rulers had to jettison Christianity's hold over society - and especially its ethical and moral rules on economics and commerce, which allowed Capitalism to rise, with its new elites based on money-power, usury and greed. This in turn was used by the Judeo-Masons as an excuse to organise Communist groups as the "answer" to the slums and poor conditions created by Capitalism.

Communism, of course, does not give freedom, but yet more slavery, more despots, more centralised wealth, and so the con goes on, mirrored today in the Left V Right see-saw of politics. Taxes continue, Usury and Bank-Cons go on, immoral anti-family laws roll on...

And the poor, hard-working people plod on under the weight.

Of course, back in the day I suppose the bankers and reds never had Eastenders to tell the dim-witted what was right or acceptable.



* Read William Cobbett's History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland for a superb socio-economic analysis of these events (btw Cobbett was not a Catholic).

Journalists in Sarkozy's Israeli Comments Conspiracy

NB: Journalists agreed not to report this. That is a CONSPIRACY.

Sarkozy to Obama: Netanyahu a Liar

Watch this great video.

The voice watching the TV and making comments is that "voice of moderation" we all so rarely really hear: a full-blooded Zionist.

And boy oh boy is he angry.

Obama is toast as far as this Israeli-Firster is concerned. And if the chosenites and their followers think this in America, you can be sure they do in Israel too.

It's funny really because if the President of France weren't Jewish, and if the Israeli journalist who broke this weren't Jewish they would be a cacophony of "Anti-Semitism" -- and this despite the fact that the French media (according to BBC reports) agree to cover-up the remarks - obviously thinking to their masters' bidding.

The whole world knows that Israel is a terrorist state and the whole Israeli machinery is based on lies. But for us (mere goys that we are) to hear that world leaders know this too has broken all the taboos of the modern media.

You will note on this video that the Israeli-Firster gets all personal about Obama ("Muslim") and yet Sarkozy, the Jewish President of France who made the comment, escapes his approbation.

Oooooooh. Jewish racism?

Liberals Want Blasphemy - French Students Say Non

Bravo to the Thought and Action blog for publicising the French Catholics who are fighting against the Marxist/Talmudic filth attacking Christ.

It's interesting that the Muslims are supporting the Catholic students - even though they know that the students want France to be 100% Christian. It is the usual Judeo-Masonic forces that approve of attacks on our traditions (remember Jerry Springer the Musical?) especially because they hold Christ in utter contempt.

Isn't it amazing that we are supposed to allow all manner of filth in the name of 'free speech' and yet as soon as someone suggest that, for example, homosexuality is an evil, or that multi-racism is wrong -- they face arrest, the sack, and the hatred of those who claim to be liberals.

GK Chesterton said that in a topsy turvey society the traditionalist is revolutionary, and so it is today. Those who sculpt "art" out of faeces get polite applause from media luvees, those who say England should be Christian and, er, English - face blind hatred.

C'est la guerre.

Rabbi Gets Drowned (Out at Notre Dame)

Thank God some people don't hide "for fear of the Jews."

Apr 21, 2010

http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2010/03/traditional-french-catholics-disrupt.html

Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Traditional French Catholics disrupt Rabbi's sermon at Notre Dame

This is some of the best news I have heard in many months. At last, Christians are standing up to bear witness to the invasion, subversion and infiltration of their churches by Christ-hating, Bible-falsifying occultists known as rabbis, who presume to lecture the people of Jesus Christ on how to behave according to the sly deceptions of the pagan Babylonian Talmud and the occult abomination of the Zohar.

Last Sunday ("Passion Sunday" of Lent, March 21), a contingent of young traditional French Catholics went to the famous medieval Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris, France, where Cardinal Andre Vingt-Trois had arranged for Rabbi Rivon Krygier to give the sermon. When the rabbi attempted to commit this sacrilege, these brave souls arose in one body and with one voice, recited the Apostle's Creed and the rosary aloud in the Cathedral.

As a result, the rabbi was forced to retreat to the sacristy (in the back of the cathedral) as the officials of Notre Dame ordered an organ to begin playing to drown out the voices of the traditional Catholics. The French Catholic television station KTO immediately cut off its live transmission as the protest began.

At last, Catholics are living their faith as the Church Militants, instead of imagining that God only desires that they pray, read and talk!

At last, they are offering a witness concerning the number one mortal enemy of Jesus Christ in 2010 A.D. -- as in 33 A.D.!

To everyone of those French Catholics and their leaders who offered this witness at Notre Dame, I say, may Almighty God richly bless you, and may He stiffen your faith and resolve to continue to defend Jesus Christ against the modern heirs of the Pharisees, who perpetually seek to extirpate His Gospel through infiltration, dilution, misdirection and the replacement of Calvary with Auschwitz.

Americans, rise up for Jesus Christ and do likewise!

Paris rabbi upbeat after cathedral lecture upset
March 23, 2010 PARIS (Reuters)

A Paris rabbi has voiced his confidence in Catholic-Jewish dialogue after young Catholic traditionalists briefly upset an unprecedented lecture he gave at the French capital's Notre Dame Cathedral. Rabbi Rivon Krygier had to leave the cathedral's main hall and deliver his lecture from a side room on Sunday after several dozen traditionalists began loudly praying a rosary after Paris Cardinal Andre Vingt-Trois introduced him. The traditionalists, who reject the improvement in relations between the two faiths decided at the 1962-1965 Second Vatican Council, said the prayers were meant as "amends for the outrage" of letting a Jewish cleric speak in the famous cathedral.

"They'll say they succeeded in banishing the rabbi to the sacristy," the rabbi told the Catholic daily La Croix on Tuesday March 23, "but the Christians active in dialogue seem much more determined to continue on this path." He said he had "full confidence in this dialogue and in the people leading it, especially in France." In his lecture, Krygier said that interreligious dialogue helped "expose the vanity of always wanting to trump the other" and display "each tradition's irreplaceable treasure."

The unusual cathedral protest came at a time of growing tension between the mainstream French Church and a small minority of traditionalists who reject the Council's reforms. Pope Benedict boosted the traditionalists' hopes last year when he readmitted to the Church four ultra-traditionalist bishops excommunicated since 1988. This caused an embarrassing uproar when one turned out to be a Holocaust denier.

The French branch of this group, the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), hailed the Notre Dame protest and said: "The Paris cathedral is neither a synagogue nor a Masonic temple."

Rabbi Krygier received a warm round of applause from people attending his lecture, which he delivered over Notre Dame's public address system from a side room.

Clash of Civilisations: 2000 Years of Anti-Christian Hatred

I just began reading a book entitled The Stripping of the Altars by Cambridge Professor Eamon Duffy after reading his more recent book on the reign of Mary Tudor (both published by Yale University Press).

Right: Prof Duffy's book on the grass roots faith of the people of England.

The book deals with the grass roots religion of the English people from circa 1400 to 1580, written to show that the changes imposed under Henry VIII, but primarily under the reign of Edward VI, were not universally embraced, moreover they were piecemeal and grudgingly enforced, and so easily reverted under the reign of Mary Tudor (e.g. removed Rood screens secretly stored and simply replaced).

That gives you some background anyway.

In the preface to the second edition Duffy answers some of his critics in relation to the mater of the Lollards in the early 15th Century. He answers that the Lollards had little effect on the population as a whole. In fact, the Lollards are an interesting pointer to how sometimes the path to hell is paved with good intentions, because some who justly called for a return to charitable acts and godly priests became twisted enough to attack the sacraments of the Church.

Some of their fellow early Lollards even turned on them and attacked them for this. It kind of makes you think of the Reformation itself, with many people fed up of genuine corruption in the Church, but the assault on Churches, the pulling down of statues etc. speaks of a far more suspect motive.

As such Duffy discusses those in the 15th Century who were attacking the very idea of the sacraments, especially of Christ's body, blood, soul and divinity being present in the Eucharist.

He writes of a Mid-15th Century play called the Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which he thinks was written in Suffolk. Here he tries to show how short-lived and shallow was 'Lollardy' because by this time the play, which could have been used to sucker-punch the Lollards and "contemporary heresy" makes no mention of them at all.

As Duffy himself says:

"The anti-sacramentalists of the play are Jews."

And that, I think, is the nub of the reality.

It was well to question corruption in the church - as many did and do. This finally resulted in the Counter Reformation (and if you get the chance, for a startling account of the theological and political nature of it and its ramifications for Europe, read The Counter Reformation 1550 - 1600 by B.J. Kidd published by SPCK, the London-based Anglican in-house publisher).

The force which always pushed against the Church as it existed and the sacraments were, surprise surprise, the Jews.

Little surprise there as the Crucifixion of Christ was the act of their religious leaders 2000 years ago, and as any genuine Christian or Jew will say the Church and Christians of the 15th Century believed with its heart and soul that the Sacramental nature of the Mass, the central pillar of daily and weekly life for most folk, was a re-enactment of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion.

In short there were Altars in every Church in every city, town and village because you need an Altar for a Sacrifice; and the vast majority of English (and European) people believed in the Sacrificial nature of the Mass.

Those opposed to this were the Jews, who rejected Christ and His Church.

This is the lesson for all history.

Who publishes the movies that blaspheme and mock our Christian heritage? Who runs the banks that enslave our people, business and government in illegal anti-Christian usury? Who bankrolled and organised Communism that ushered dozens upon dozens of millions of Christians to their deaths in gulags and via enforced starvation? Who are disproportionally present in so many "Western" governments - governments that betray our people, enslave us, destroy ancient freedoms and bring in multi-culti anti-religion?

Who promoted Luther and his works to attack the Church, only to reject even his watered-down Christianity (much to his chagrin after all their help and anti-Papal diatribes he thought he would convert them all) and so cause him to retaliate by writing 'The Jews and their Lies?'

What of the Jewish printing presses in places such as Amsterdam which published tracts attacking the Inquisition in Spain?

This was the Church's attempt to overturn heresy in its own ranks (note: nobody outside the Church could be brought in front of it) by "conversos" - Jews who claimed to have converted to Christianity yet continued a form of "Crypto-Judiac" religion. And yet the Jewish printing preses churned out material purporting to attack the Church for some kind of "genocide" of Jews.

Indeed, so many people (for the right and wrong reasons!) point to the Spanish Inquisition as the forerunner to the Shoa/Holohoax; and the roll of a controlled media in both events cannot be overstated.

As one nationalist wrote in his article on 'the Sacred Nature of the Six Million' the attempt in more recent decades has been to remove the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as the centre of world history, the point in time that all peoples looked to, with the "sacrifice" of the "six million" in WW2.

Some folks think when the Jews rejected Christ they were looking for a new militaristic messiah that would bring their world empire (er... New World Order), with the Jews as the "chosen people" at the head of it.

Others think that the Jewish people, or their religious/political leaders, now consider themselves to be a kind of messiah (a form of Race worship), with a duty to control the world, bring "enlightenment" to the world (hence the role of Freemasonry etc.) and throw off the shackles of Christian "superstition."

Right: A satire on the French Revolution, yet in The Terror of the Masonic French Revolution, there was a real Talmudic bloodlust to murder all those who adhered to Christianity and Tradition. The hatred of Christianity saw a naked whore enthroned in a Cathedral as the goddess Reason, and the Eiffel Tower constructed on consecrated Hosts, to show the Masonic "victory" over Christ.

They founded Freemasonry as a "gentile Judaism" to bring about revolutions and amoral politrickery, and even Freemasons have admitted that their religion is Talmudic and Luciferian.

They founded Communism to bring about a revolution against Christianity and to establish their Utopian vision (of gulags and repression). Communists and Jews have admitted that Communism was Jewish.

They even founded Islam some 1400 years ago as a means to stop Christianity spreading eastwards to their new lands in the Khazaria region, to provide a buffer-zone.

Anyhoo, the issue here is that whether we look at Palestine at the time of Christ, 7th Century Arabia, Mid 15th Century England, 17th Century Spain, 18th Century France, 20th Century Russia, 21st Century America or so many other times and nations, the "Clash of Civilisations" is clear.

It has been a fight ongoing for 2000 years.

If we value our Christian heritage then we have to know our history, we have to know who our enemy is, and why they hate us and Christianity.

Unless we know all this, any resistance, any fight for national Independence is meaningless, because our historical enemy will merely take it and pervert it to their own ends.

If Nationalism becomes Zionist then it has lost before it has even got anywhere.

Government Assassins: Still No Apology!

In the 70s and 80s thousands of people were infected with HIV and Hepatitis from infected blood imported from America.

The government has still hasn't had the good grace to apologise to all those who have died (circa 2,000), been infected and suffered.

They wouldn't even pay for a public enquiry. A public enquiry that ended today was paid for by donations.

What a scandal!

The French "identity rock" band In Memoriam released a song about the scandal, called in English, Assassins of the People.

It is, in my humble opinion, one of the best nationalist songs, but given the subject matter it covers it seems most apt to give it another airing today:

Free Debate Quashed: International Conspiracy Continues

GERMANY, ARGENTINA & NOW FRANCE

THE CLENCH FIST OF REPRESSION APPROACHES

Right: The original French Tricolour had the Red stripe as the widest of all, significant in what was essentially a pre-Communist Masonic State. The Reds and Zionist Lobby in France now use the Masonic "human rights" law to quash the right to free debate.

Get a load of this you crazy kids:

French group will charge bishop
February 11, 2009

PARIS (JTA) -- A French human rights group says it will press charges
against a Holocaust-denying British bishop. The International League
Against Racism and Anti-Semitism said Wednesday in a statement that it
would charge Richard Williamson with "contesting crimes against
humanity" and denying the Holocaust in an article published in the
German Der Spiegel magazine and in a television interview.

Who else could bring about such pressure and seek to jail a cleric who has never harmed a single hair on a single head (Jewish or Gentile!).

If I question the extent and the manner of the deaths in Rwanda (note: not the fact that Rwandans died, just the manner) will the Argentineans, Germans and French courts spring into life to bring charges against me?

What about the genocide of the Armenians (the first ever Christian nation) which whole groups of people - e.g. the Turkish rulers - deny?

Or shall we discuss the 33 million estimated Ukrainian Christian farmers deliberately starved to death by the Soviet State and its Commissars?

We can believe or deny almost all of them, and whether we are Turks, Communists or African tribal leaders -- we should be free to openly discuss the manner and extent of the murders, of he suffering, of the genocides... ad no-one, anywhere in the world would dream of fining or jailing a person for saying something like "sure the Ukrainians suffered and many died, but it wasn't deliberate and Stalin had no idea what was going on" however foolish, insincere and ignorant you or I may consider such a statement to be.

Is it sinking in yet?

A cleric, a man of Christ, a man used to libraries and classrooms, a man dedicated to promoting the family, the sanctity of every life at every stage... yet simply for stating his own opinion, after research and reading, on an aspect of one historical matter, this man is being hounded by the courts of THREE COUNTRIES (at the last count).

Can anyone doubt the power of the Zionist Lobby or that there is an international, concerted attempt (and that's the legal definition of conspiracy!) against one English Bishop?

In the shadow of not a single War Crime charge being levied against Israel for clear contraventions of the Geneva Convention, the international Zionist Lobby clearly thinks it is at the Zenith of its powers as it seeks to downplay real genocide, and yet screech loudly over the mere words of an Argentinian-based cleric.

Disproportionate? Yep! And the people of Gaza know all about that.

French Identity Rock: In Memoriam 'Assassins'

For my money one of the best songs to come out of France, about the French people given death sentences by politically correct politicians who ensured they were given AIDS infected blood transfusions.

It's a shame the last 30 seconds or so are missing from this - but something's better than nothing!

Link:
In Memoriam 'Persona Non Grata' CD from the FC Shop

And a track from the above (linked) Persona Non Grata CD:

Free People Will Always Defend Faith, Family, Nation

Why are we Distributists?

Why are we Ruralists?

Why are we Nationalists?

Right: The latest statement from the EU on why other countries must continue to ratify the Lisbon Treaty.

Because we believe all three give freedom and identity to the peoples of Europe -- and elsewhere for that matter!

We believe that the state should not interfere unnecessarily with families and communities.

We believe that people, that is communities and families, should be as self-sufficient as possible.

What could be greener in this age of ecological worriers? What could better for the "carbon footprint" counters of medialand?

But it goes deeper than that. Our people, crammed into tower blocks, council estates and terraced rabbit hutches have, step by step, been disenfranchised and homogenised.

This has been a process over centuries which began in earnest with the enclosing of the land, the industrial revolution and the cramming of our people into slums, even into basements as a means for a few industrialists and bankers to make the equivalent of billions.

Profits before people. It's been their mantra ever since.

The process reached its zenith with mass coloured immigration which destroyed even the urbanised communities which retained a portion of the identity and belonging that our peoples once felt down to their very core.

Of course its not possible to undo hundreds of years of rampant Capitalism, or the 'profits before people' creed which has seen our people shoved around for the benefit of those whose sole concern is money, those who have no national pride or belonging (the New Unhappy Lords that GK Chesterton wrote about, and the bankers with their Hebrew snouts in ledgers that Dr Saunders Lewis wrote about).

But where our people (Europeans) retain some identity, in the rural areas, the vote against the EU in Ireland, France and elsewhere was strongest (as shown in the link below).

The metropolitan elites, the chattering classes, which are known in the UK by such London locales as Islington and Primrose Hill, are pro-EU because they know they will benefit financially. They have no national identity to speak of, their first loyalty is to money, then to their "metrosexual" lifestyle and for the older generation to the local Lodge.

Of course in rural areas, families and communities tend to be less multi-culti which means they retain not only a sense of national pride and duty to the country, but they also retain a Christian identity. This is something I have witnessed myself not only here, but also in Ireland, Spain, France, Italy, Romania and elsewhere.

This is why our chattering classes embrace the EU. It's also why they embrace multi-culturalism and seek to force it on the rest of us.

They want our loyalties to be to Sony and Pepsi, Vodafone and Tescos.

The very idea of Faith, Family, Nation is anathema to them.

Faith: Christianity is at best "medieval" and at worst "bigoted" and to be overturned, ignored or changed to be just one of many in a pick-n-mix melting pot which is also "tolerant" of homosexuality, abortion etc.

Family: This cornerstone of any decent nation has been willfully neglected and attacked by the political elites to the extent that the multi-surname "family" and the proliferation of "partners" is now the norm in many areas. Of course the latter is also a pc agenda to put homosexual "couples" on a par with cohabitees, married automatons with no kids (but two careers and two cars!), and traditional families who are busy trying to make sure we as a people don't die out.

Nation: Well, the very EU agenda is seeking to destroy all vestige of nationhood throughout Europe! And it is those very communities which hold onto their remnants of Faith, Family and Nation - however imperfect or warped by decades of media spin - that have delivered such a shock to the political, big business and multi-culti classes.

So the next time someone tells you that Ruralism, Distributism and Nationalism are "backwards" just tell them if the alternative is to move forwards into EU slavery, police state controls and total loss of identity, then we'll be glad to move "backwards."

Left: GK Chesterton, "The Defender" who shot through the limp arguments of liberals, socialists, multi-cultis, Capitalists and the political class with tenacity and wit.

Besides which as has been attributed to GK Chesterton when some tom fool told him that you cannot turn the clock back he said "Sir, you clearly know nothing about clocks."

As GKC also said, in the topsy turvey world it is the Traditionalist who is the Revolutionary. And if GKC thought his world was topsy turvey, what would he say of ours???


Link:
The Rural and the Poor Defeated the EU

Last Week's Quote: de la Tour du Pin

"The immediate aim of social politics must be to gather men together in the religious, economic or political order, not only according to their domicile, but also in accordance with their profession; in religion, according to their religious fraternity; in the economy by their corporations*; in politics according to the representation of interests; in other words to develop the corporative* regime with all its principles."

R. de la Tour du Pin,
Vers un Ordre Social Chretien.


*By Corporations we should understand it as Guilds and Workingmen's Associations - not like Corporate Bodies today which tend to be Big Businesses and Global Multi-Nationals. A country in which Guilds/Corporations were important in social, economic and political life were known as Corporative or Corporatist. Most were labeled "Fascist" and were Christian.

Nationalist Online Encyclopaedia

NATIONALIST COUNTER-WIKIPEDIA SITE

A good friend sent me the following text received from French comrades:

Have a look on our new web-project :

www.eruditus.info

C'est une encyclopédie sur internet, comme wikipedia, mais d'esprit contre-révolutionnaire.

en.eruditus.info en anglais

fr.eruditus.info en français

et pourquoi pas d'autres langues.

www.eruditus.info deviendrait alors le site d'accueil général redirigeant vers les sites en différentes langues.

---

I urge all FC readers and supporters to visit the site and help it in whatever way you can.

The French nationalists behind the site are absolutely genuine and their politics are our politics.

Visitez vous le site [repeat that in your best schoolboy French!]