Queen Offers us Harmony? Pull the Other One it's Got Jingle Bells on

As is the way of things, we have been told what will be in the queen's speech tomorrow.

For those of you outside of the UK or the parts of the world that used to be coloured in red on the map (that's the British Empire dontchaknow), the queen records a speech which then goes out on BBC1, I think at 3pm. I have to be honest - as a seditious-minded bod I don't watch it.

The modern media likes to tell us what will be said, what is being said, and what has been said by the "great and the good" and so the political class and others get three times the coverage for the same hackneyed speeches offering the world but delivering nothing.

But to return to the queen's speech.

This year, we're reliably informed she will tell us how sport can bring communities together and create harmony.

Harmony.

Now there's a buzz word.

When a family has Sunday dinner and everyone share's the roasties, we rarely hear the word "harmony."

When a classroom in Shropshire works quietly and finishes its work on time, we rarely hear the word "harmony."

When Bristol City play Bristol Rovers and the supporters mix in a friendly atmosphere, we rarely hear the word "harmony."

When scouts from across Scotland hold a gathering and everything goes smoothly with a wonderful atmosphere, we rarely hear the word "harmony."

Harmony is a special word.

Harmony is a buzz word used by those who defend the migration of millions of non-Europeans, non-Whites to the UK.

Harmony is a buzz word used by those who have created the Balkanisation of our cities, who have imported organised crime gangs and drug cartels from around the world.

Harmony is the buzz word used by those who destroyed the harmony of indigenous working class communities made up of British people with a smattering of our European/Christian cousins.

The same forces who purposefully destroyed communities that were perfectly harmonious and created violence, street crime, drugs-riddled areas and much more now have the chutzpah to preach about "harmony."

A few years ago the queen used her speech to wax lyrical about the "joys" of multi-culturalism - joys she and the political class never have to enjoy at their fullest, at the sharp end shall we say?

Over decades the rulers of this land (seen and unseen - but Freemasons almost to a man) have destroyed the harmony we had. And the queen sat over all that chaos, rubber-stamping the obscene laws that allowed mass, uncontrolled immigration which has destroyed the White, Christian character of this land.

Yet they know have the brassneck to tell us that sports can bring "harmony."

As if!

If the political class wanted harmony they could start resettling the non-Whites. Start with the criminals, families who wish to return, professionals who want to help others in their own lands - and let's go from there.

Over the years, who knows, we may even get what the queen falsely offers us now: harmony.

Llywelyn the Last's Celtic Cross Battle Flag

According to Wikipedia:

Banner known as Y Groes Nawdd or "The Cross of Neith" said to have been the battle flag of Llywelyn the Last.

Llywelyn the Last - as the name suggests - is still held by many in Wales to be the last legitimate Prince of Wales - killed in 1282. The current holder, of the House of Saxe-Coburg, is not said to hold the title legitimately.


Link:
Wikipedia Welsh Flags
Owain Glyndwr's Flag

WILL PRINCE HARRY BE "RACIALLY AWARE?"

Right: So much to learn... Prince Harry scowls at the prospect?

How comforting for those of us who have seen millions of non-Europeans flood into this country - without a mandate from the people! - in the belief that they could stay here and colonise our nation (I was taught in my inner city comprehensive school by a CND-badge wearing suspiciously hairy feminist teacher that Colonialism was wrong...) - that prince Harry has been sent on a Racial Awareness course!

It's about time someone in the upper echelons of the nation - royalty being better than nothing! - is going to be taught how essential it is that this country should be White, European and Christian!

What a breath of fresh air that his parents are instilling a form of folk-pride and self-awareness of his heritage in this day and age when anyone who promotes awareness of anything remotely White is accused of (crime of the decade!) "extremism" or (even worse... ta da:) "racism."

I think all our representatives, royalty and anyone in the public eye should be sent on racial awareness courses!

Some might call it brain-washing, but if our wonderfully democratic government have given the green light for such things, what have we got to be nervous of?

So come on Prince Harry! Stop being an alcohol-led clown and weekend quasi "racist" -- get on that course and learn about the vast European, Christian and White roots of this land, of the culture that nurtured our forefathers, of the blood that flows in our veins.

Racial Awareness Courses!

Phew.

Just when I thought we were lost in a sea of multi-culti madness forever.


P.S.

A colleague sent this email onto me:

Apparently England's biggest St George's Day parade is facing the axe, because (according to Labour Councillor Yvonne Davies) "It is not only the parade which is the problem, but the tribal excitement it creates."

England's National Day causes "tribal excitement"???? Can you imaging any politician daring to use such language about the Notting Hill Mugging Fest, ooops sorry, Carnival?

Yvonne Davies, said the parade created an "unhealthy atmosphere" and inspired young boys to be racist. (Translation from ZaNuLabour speak: the parade celebrates English patriotism and makes our kids aware of their precious heritage, for which their grandfathers and great-grandfathers had fought and died to protect).

Councillor Davies wrote in: "I am sure most are very respectful and law-abiding, however some are distasteful in the extreme and wish to divide and separate people from each other."

Hmmm.

Is it distasteful to celebrate England's national Saint? Isn't it rather a celebration of all things English, Christian and historical?

We know the Irish celebrate their heritage, nationhood, language and Christian culture in Ireland and across the world.

We know the Welsh celebrate their heritage, nationhood, language and Christian culture in Wales via St David's Day celebrations and Eisteddfods.

So why not the English?

Asian celebrations like Diwali are promoted. African festivals are promoted. Even homosexual festivals are bank-rolled by big business and councils.

The problem the Labourites have is that this festival is English, Christian and therefore "divisive."

It is high time the people of England fought for their rights, just as the Irish and Welsh had to many decades ago to enshrine their rights, gain even the vestige of nationhood, fight repressive anti-indigenous laws, and raise their own national flags!

It's now time for the English to realise that if they do not fight for their rights in the same sense then their nationhood will be lost to a miasma of secular, multi-culti "Wintervals" and Big Business sponsored "ethnic" events all designed to undermine their very Englishness.

When Britain colonised India (on behalf of Big Business naturally!) it took the Indians many decades of struggle and strife to throw off the Colonial power and gain independence: India for the Indians which very few can disagree with!

Now that India, Pakistan, Africa etc. are colonising England, how many decades of struggle and strife will it take for the English to throw off these Neo-Colonial powers?

If India for the Indians is correct: how can England for the English be wrong?

Perhaps the "Racially Aware" Prince Harry will lead the charge!

"Upon this charge, cry God for England, Harry and Saint George!"

Billy Shakespeare (DoB St George's Day), Henry V

Good Golly! Carol Thatcher Sacked by BBC for Gollywog Remark

Yes - the BBC has sacked Carol Thatcher for making a remark in a private conversation on BBC property that a tennis player had hair like a Gollywog.

Right: Good Golly Miss Molly! Whilst guns and drugs litter our cities, whilst England has its identity ripped apart, the pc brigade get upset over an historical character from literature and cartoons.

The BBC has banned words like Wog and Nigger, whilst programmes that are anti-White and full of obscenities (that I find offensive) litter the airwaves.

Before too long moves will be made to ban Gollywogs.

It's all reminiscent of Colin Jordan's Merrie England 2000 book in which an old woman has to be "re-educated" for having a dog called Nigger (like the dog made famous in the film about the Dambuster Squadron -- you may remember Channel 4 blanked the name of the dog out of the film).

A friend of mine even had a visit from the police for having a Gollywog in his works vehicle.

So are these things illegal?

Er... no!

So why are the BBC so prissy? Why do the police care? And why have the Royal Family just banned them from their shops?

It's called political correctness.

With all sorts of filth aimed at our children (on TV, in magazines and in books) the Enid Blyton Noddy books were re-written to edit out the Gollywog character - and then re-made for TV too.

It's like Soviet Russia here!!!

All sorts of degenerate behaviour and language is not only allowed or accepted on TV and the media, it is promoted!

Yet "Gollywog" is beyond the fringe... sheesh! Get a life you moaning minnies.

Link:
Gollywog goodies from FC

Prince Harry's "Paki-Gate" - and the BBC's "Parky-Starn" Rule

So Prince Harry (pictured right) has apologised for using the terms "paki" and later "raghead" in a 'home video' taken with his army friends.

The "Paki-Gate" affair raises a number of interesting points:

1. Is the word "paki" illegal?

2. If not is calling someone a "Scot" illegal? Or a Saudi? Or a Khazak? Or an Afghani? Or an Iraqi? Or an Israeli?

3. Furthermore if it is illegal: will it be an arrestable offence to say "I'm going down the paki shop" if your neighbour overhears you? Or if a child or sibling has the hump over something else and reports you?

4. And if it is illegal - will it be illegal for an Asiatic person (Jew or Gentile) to call someone from these islands a Scot? or Taffy? or Mick? or Brit? If not won't that show favouritism to non-White communities and individuals?

5. If it's not illegal - and with hundreds of thousands of people using the term day-in, day-out one has to wonder - why the fuss? After all it is merely an abbreviation of "Pakistan."

6. If it is illegal - why has a simple "sorry" from Prince Harry sufficed to stop an arrest and a charge? After all, if it is illegal we have to assume that anyone else who isn't royal or upper class would be arrested and charged (not to mention getting their door kicked in).

7. If it is illegal will the various t-shirts and other paraphernalia with the words "PROUD TO BE A PAKI" be made illegal and their usage banned?

8. Last but not least - why are we living in and accepting a society wherein the words "f##k," "c##t" and many other highly offensive terms are used on TV, seen on t-shirts, shown in shop windows and much more, with no action taken by the police, the courts etc., yet a simple abbreviation of a nation's name (same as Scot) is deemed unusable and offensive (even to the stupid degree that Pakistan is no longer pronounced Paki-Stan by BBC newsreaders but rather Parky-Starn in a ridiculous pc attempt to be non-offensive!).

Would someone please wake me up -- I must be dreaming!

The Duchesses, Asiatic Gypsies and Mass Murder

I've been watching the 'Tonight' special report on ITV featuring the Duchess of York and her daughters visiting orphanages in Turkey and Romania.

Right: It's horrible, it's barbaric, it's abusive, it's shocking, it's the ultimate rejection of the innocence of childhood and the blessing that is each new life. Yet there's no 'Shock and Awe' documentary exposing this abuse.

On the Turkish footage we are reminded that the country is all but Third World and its Asiatic moral codes don't deserve to be held up as 'European.'

On the Romanian footage - the orphanages were appalling, but it's the "gypsy village" I'd like to comment on. The outwardly poor looking gypsies were all well-fed and as two of the women spoke - one old one young - they could not hide they had a few gold teeth each.
Is that poverty? Gold teeth don't come cheap in a relatively poorer country with no NHS.

I felt like the Asiatic gypsies were involved in a con job -- i.e. "quick, here come the rich foreignors. Everyone say how poor we are and how we'll give up our children to the orphanages because we are so poor."

Hey presto the mega-rich Duchess said she'd give £200,000 to the village from her charity.

Whilst I do think it admirable for those blessed with position and wealth to help those unfortunate souls in the orphanages, the whole gypsy set-up just felt like a con from start to finish.

We all know how easy it is to con money out of the idle rich by tugging at their heart strings.

When I visited Romania some years ago I witnessed the Asiatic gypsies begging in the streets of the towns and cities, some of whom had had their legs broken by their own families and/or people just so they could garner more donations.

The Romanian nationalists I was staying with showed me the Asiatic Gypsy Mafia's Mercedes cars travelling around and explained how they would pick-up the beggars at the end of their day's work.

As a last thought as I considered the possible thousands of children suffering and neglected in Turkey and Romania (perhaps by families who couldn't cope, or didn't want the "hassle" or simply wanted to save money or keep their 'careers') I couldn't help but think what utter hypocrites we are.

Here in the UK we have murdered circa 6,000,000 babies since the Abortion Act was passed in 1967.

How many were killed via the excuses of "poverty" or "careers" etc. etc. Yet we live in better conditions than many of the families in Turkey or Romania that put their children in the orphanages.

How many in the Duchess of York's social circles have killed their little boys and little girls just so their career doesn't suffer a setback? Or so they can continue their two cars and two holidays a year lifestyle?

Christ famously said we should take the log from our own eye before seeing the splinter in others.

Somehow I can't help but think the Turks and Romanians could well be sitting in their homes discussing how an advanced, relatively rich and prosperous, and allegedly Christian state, such as the UK could kill 6 million of its own people in circa 40 years.

Perhaps the Duchess will make a film showing the mums being frogmarched into the abortuaries by their "partners" or parents; or the skiing holiday elite discussing the number of abortions they've had; or the businesswomen who've had abortions; or the poor who might otherwise be helped who've felt forced into carrying out abortions; or the "doctors" who have made huge fortunes by killing helpless babies; or the "charities" and pressure groups who promote abortion and also make huge amounts of cash through providing abortions!

But don't hold your breath dear reader.

It's OK to make films about "dusky" people who dump their children in orphanages by the dozens; but not to show us - the advanced, intelligent, Christian, Western, well-off consumers - churning our children into a bloody mess by the million!

The Turks and Asiatic Gypsies might well point the finger at us and say:

PHYSICIAN, HEAL THYSELF!

Princess Diana Memorial

And so the media has been involved with yet another furore over a non story.

As our country falls about our feet, with a crime endemic, a drugs endemic, an immigration endemic - well, you get the idea - what do the media care about?

Princess Di's memorial service and whether Camilla (Duchess of Cornwall) should be there or not.

Now this makes me have several trains of thought:

1. I'm not against the Diana Memorial per se. It is certainly efficacious to pray for the dead and a great act of charity, and it is the most natural thing for family members to do - for if we're forgotten by our loved ones - who will there be to pray for us?

2. The turning of this event into a public spectacle though has me reaching for my vomit bucket. Diana was no saint (which of us is?), but the painting of her as some kind of latter-day secular saint because she was a mate of Elton John and Versace or filled her vacuous hours with work for some charities is more than a bit much.

3. Who gets invited to the service should be up to the family, but then this should be a family affair, instead it becomes some kind of celebrity bash.

4. The hysteria surrounding Diana that gets typically brain-dead Sun readers and Eastenders-watching automatons incanting "she was the peoples' princess weren't she?" is enough to make anyone blow chunks. This media-created myth should be exposed for what it is.

Diana was possibly, (as I believe King Lear said) 'more sinned against than sinning' and what hurt is done by her family and friends praying for her immortal soul?

But this circus, run equally by the media, the Royal Family, and various pressure groups is indicative of Diana's sad life.

The thought of a Christian ceremony (albeit a typically effeminate Anglican one) with a gaggle of homosexuals present (like Sir Elton of John - knighted for services to buggery) is somehow suitable.

It sums up the faggot-hugging, Masonic, non-religion of the monarchy and the ridiculous media-circus that these events inevitably are.

So whisper a prayer for the soul of Diana today.

Chances are that your small private prayer may, if she's not beyond our help, do the poor woman more good than all the public wailing by the preening garish peacocks on display at the ceremony today.