Want to Decimate Burglary? Stamp Out Drugs!

In the news today a judge is getting stick for calling burglary of a home an act of "courage."

From what I've heard it's clear that the burglar, who burgled three homes, was on drugs at the time.

A solicitor on Radio 5 this morning said that most of the burglars he defended were on drugs or doing it out of desperation to get drugs.

So what's the common link here Poindexter? Drugs!

As I wrote recently, there is no war on drugs. Illegal, Class A drugs are freely available in our towns, cities and villages. The state seems to not want to stamp out drugs, the pushers, the gangs and the spooks behind the drugs cartels.

If we want to wipe out the vast majority of burglaries (and shop lifting) then we have to wipe out the usage and dependency on hard drugs. This is for the Common Good - and out of charity of those hooked on these evil substances.

The problem is that too many lawyers, MPs, bankers and the elite in this country are users themselves. They don't want to take action as they use various drugs. The Guardian and The Independent regularly campaign for liberalising drug laws. The Guardian sells more copies in the BBC than any other newspaper!

The media, politicians, elites etc. may make occasional noises about clamping down on drugs, but this phony war has been going on for decades.

Hard drugs like heroin ruin lives and communities. There needs to be real zero tolerance. Personally I would like to see capital punishment brought in for the pushers of hard drugs. Trace the importers and the cartels. Smash those who profit on misery. And if foreign agencies are involved in the couriering of drugs, then target them too!

There needs to be a real war on drugs. The young especially need to be offered hope - not degradation, oblivion and a futile existence. Sticks and carrots. Wipe out the drugs gangs, help the poor unfortunates.

It really is that simple.

Either we believe in a better society and the rule of law; or we believe in anarchy, amorality, crime and dysfunction.

Institutional Anti-White Racism in the Police, Judiciary, Media and Political Classes

This is a superb video which makes most/all of the points raised by FC over the years, including these key issues:

• Loss of ancient rights viz Double Jeopardy (leading to possible State abuse of innocents). 
• Ridiculous subjective nature of "racial" incidents in law in favour of "ethnic minorities" and so discriminatory and hence probably illegal. 
• Media cover-up of racial attacks against whites (meaning an ipso facto racially-biased conspiracy across the media titles/channels).

Something is rotten in this system, and the law, politicians, police and media are involved!

We are the victims of this prejudice and slanted policing, non-reporting of crimes and a badly skewed criminal justice system.

Watch this video. Understand its implications. Tell others. Spread the word.

Discrimination, even against homosexual degenerates, is supposed to be illegal. Yet it is encouraged when it comes to the many white victims of the criminals amongst the guest 'communities' we have in this country.

Spread the word, if for no other reason than to remember the vicious murder of Kriss Donald, the Glaswegian 15 year-old boy tortured, murdered and burnt by Asian thugs. A vicious anti-white murder that the entire media decided we do not need to know about!

The Strathclyde Police admitted to dropping Operation Gadher which had acted against Asian gangs in the area. If it had been left open, this could have saved Kriss's life, but the police feared being labelled "racist" and so shut down the very Operation that could have stopped what is probably the worst racially motivated murder in the UK. The BBC itself admitted to under-reporting Kriss's murder.

These are just two prime examples of institutional political correctness which led to bad decisions which impacted on the crime itself and public knowledge of the crime! Why were these decisions made? Who stands to gain?

It is not illegal to ask these questions. It is not "hatred" to want to stop the murder of white people. It is not "racist" to fight for our streets to be safe from knife or gun crime.

The politicians often tell us we fight (needless and illegal/immoral) wars around the world to "keep the British people safe" and yet we are not safe! Not from "Muslim extremists" in Asia or the Middle East, but from the muggers, drugs gangs and the knife and gun wielding hoodlums that litter the streets of our cities.

Remember a few years back when the then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith took her armed protection officers with her on the streets of South London just to get a take away? Sadly most of us don't have that luxury, yet from their white-flight plush homes (in the case of Smith the luxuriousness of which was helped along by tax-payers' money she conned out of the MP's expenses system, yet miraculously evaded jail), the people who run the media, political machinery, courts and police, tell us continually how immigration has "enriched" us, whilst the rest of us have to take to the streets unprotected from gangs and suchlike.

If the politicians really want our people to be safe, then they should act here (not in Asia!) to stop attacks on people on the streets of London, Manchester, Birmingham etc.

And if they are serious about "stopping racist attacks" then why not come down hard on the many muggings, rapes, stabbings, shootings and other attacks carried out by "ethnic" criminals against indigenous people, whose only fault seems to be their ethnicity/identity.

Or is Stephen Lawrence more important than the many English, Scottish and Welsh victims of racially aggravated crimes (not treated as such by any layer of the establishment)? If so, why?

I believe we are looking at institutional anti-White racism at every level.





Many thanks to GriffinWatch for putting this video on their blog.

Ex-NF Activist Who Says He Worked for SB and Mossad

Druggie, traitor and weirdo

Ex "hardman" Carl Clark, of unnamed "Irish terrorist loyalist groups" (?) and the National Front, worked for the Special Branch and Mossad according to this happy clappy site: Network Norwich and Norfolk

The media has us think that the secret state and Israeli spies are not interested in "fringe" groups on the "right wing" in the UK.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

If anyone out there knows the story of this charming gent or his trail of connections please let us know.

What's particularly interesting is that he was involved in drug-running. He doesn't mention for whom. The syntax, grammar and names in the article are especially bad and in a few places make little sense.

As we have said time and time again, drugs have no place in nationalism and if you see "nationalists" involved in drugs, we advise you very strongly to steer well clear.

It is more than likely this Walter Mitty character was feeding info to the enemies of nationalism for his drugs money, or to escape a sentence for drug pushing. Who knows...

BNP and EDL: Opponent Spells Out His Warped Vision of Current Affairs

Beware: this video contains some bad language:



This makes for an interesting video. The bloke is quite amusing, but twists the facts somewhat.

He knows that the media and the establishment can twist facts. Otherwise why would most Sun readers/Eastenders watchers think that our intervention in Libya was about saving lives and helping a group of people after "democracy."

He also knows that the media can "cover" a story, the equivalent of putting it on page 23, or publicise it by giving it prominence. Ipso facto how many people think that the (pro-Zionist) EDL's boss was in jail?

He is also being more than economical with the facts if he thinks an arrest for assault and then a ban from attending political rallies is not political. As ex-West London NF leader Phil Andrews found out to his cost in the 80s, one can be arrested for violence on little or no evidence. As for banning someone from specific political rallies - that is in reality being a political prisoner.

Don't even begin on the Zionist control of the media. That has been well documented and has nothing to do with the presenters and journalists. The American media especially is almost entirely Zionist owned. Only a fool would say otherwise. Various Jewish individuals have written about this, because they are proud of it (not to have a pop) therefore these facts are not the figment of anyone's imagination, not least people like the EDL boss who is very pro-Israel.

This chap also ignores the minutiae of the British media, in which multi-culti liberalism plays a huge part. So whilst the "Zionists" will appreciate a street movement that pushes the patriotic types toward Israeli policy (a road first trod by Mr Griffin), the liberal media will not want to promote the EDL boss's loss of liberty, just for addressing a political rally (even if it was a pro-Israeli one and he was dressed as a rabbi).

When dealing with the secret state, the media and suchlike, one is not dealing (if you'll excuse the pun) in black and white. This chap knows that of course, unless he is a complete arse. Think of Northern Ireland where the state has assets in Loyalist and Republican groups, even if some might simplify that situation to say the Loyalists were pro-British State and the Republicans were anti-British State. This would not stop the State from having assets in both, saying different things, pushing in various directions. Some may be promoted by the media, some ignored, depending on the ideology of the reporters, depending on the State policy at that time, and 101 other permutations.

So enjoy the video. The bloke is amusing. But don't be fooled. The BNP is likely to fold. It has certainly already collapsed. Another safety valve will come to the fore. It may be the EDL, it may be some other grouping.

The main picture to keep in mind is that the world financial system is usurious and run by the Rothschilds and their lieutenants. The political system is Masonic and the left/right dichotomy is in the pockets of the bankers. The mass media is controlled and will never defend the interests of the people.

Whatever simple idiots like this might say, we are just sheep paying taxes and having our rights taken away and our birth-right ripped from us. Democracy is a sham under the control of international financiers - the New Unhappy Lords that GK Chesterton warned us about and AK Chesterton wrote in-depth about.

In the years in between things have worsened.

Mass immigration, homosexual "rights," out of control abortion, war after unjustified Zionist war, drugs rampant, usury that has put billions out of work, taxation that is rapacious (mostly to pay uncontrollable usury-debt), an EU into which money is poured as in into a bottomless pit, and many other evils in which none of us had a say.

Democracy is a joke. Were our fathers asked in the 40s if millions of non-Whites should be allowed in? And on all the other issues above, we've been lied to, facts have have been twisted, and the controlled mass media has been used to con us all.

"Anti-racists" are like the peaceniks of the 60s. They are today's "useful idiots." But instead of being the 'useful idiots' of the USSR with its gulags full of Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc., they are the 'useful idiots' of those who wish to enslave the world because they are set out to destroy all nationality, all national pride that allows peoples to stand as-one in defiance of destruction and slavery (whether the native Indians of the Americas or the white Christian communities of Europe).

Once we lose our nationalism, our sense of patriotism, our belief that we are rooted in the land (blood and soil) that our forefathers worked, defended and lived on, then we lose the will to defend that land from the New Unhappy Lords: the EU Commissioners, the Rothschilds, the media moguls and all who seek to turn us into coffee coloured, brain-dead, tax-slaves too busy singing 'One World' anthems to see that we are mice in the laboratory of the mega-rich banksters who own the world through the creation of usury-debt.

Remember your traditions. Hold fast to the Faith of your fathers. Stand firm on the soil on which they toiled and bled. Defend the family with all your might.

We all have a duty to fight. We can fight in our daily lives. Fight in the way we bring up our children. Fight in the way we spread our ideas and educate others.

To not fight is to accept slavery and join the unthinking drones who do not see the Rothschild puppet masters controlling the rent-boy politicians.

Freedom or slavery? The choice is quite easy isn't it?

Extremists in Media Land: Not the Cocaine Snorters!

Buttering my toast this morning*, I was watching the newspaper review on BBC News 24. They referred to a political party called True Finns, who seem to be growing in support, and who seem to be Eurosceptic.

That all sounds fine and groovy.

The funny thing was that the talking head doing the reviews said words to the effect** of 'they claim not be nationalistic, but then they are opposed to more immigration into Finland.'

Right: Opposing immigration is "extremist" yet snorting cocaine is fine and dandy -- welcome to the media world.

What struck me here is that this was mentioned (to the Asiatic presenter) as something quite sinister, and I think the word "extreme" even made its way into the banter.

Pardon me! Since when is it extreme to oppose the EU or immigration?

Imagine our grandparents being asked these questions:

1. Do you think it would be extreme to keep Britain as it is, with its wealth of native cultures, and its addition of European cultures? Or would it be extreme to bring over many millions of Asians and Africans?
2. Do you think it would be extreme to keep Europe as a bloc of trading, friendly nations with peace treaties and suchlike to ensure security and peace, all in the framework of Christian traditions? or would it be extreme to have a single European currency, central European bank, unelected European Commission deciding laws, and a Human Rights legislation handing out new laws against Christians and promoting homosexuality?

Imagine our parents being asked those questions... or us! And that is the problem with media-land. The lefty, drugged-up, homosexualist mindset reigns supreme and so, in their cosy little bubble surrounded by the same people, who went to the same schools, who got the same degrees, who snort the same cocaine, being opposed to immigration (note: not hating anything non-European or non-White) is "extremist"!

This is the same reason why these media-heads consider Christians and their hatred of homosexuality (loving the sinner, hating the sin etc. etc.) "extremist" because they cannot countenance anything else.

The mindset of the Marxists who have infiltrated local government, schools and the media is made to seem "mainstream" whereas those who are Traditional (in politics, religion, morals etc.) are made out as the "New Nazis."

Our streets are awash with drugs, immigration has delivered chaos and gun crime, homosexuality and its promotion is creating a sexual laissez faire society with the concurrent amorality in all spheres... and these people wonder why our society is crumbling?

Their "truths" born out of the cultural, sexual, political, religious and moral maelstrom that was the 60s, are separate from the rest of history - and yet we are told to believe in all their PC claptrap as if it were the Gospel Truth. Not even all men alive today believe in it, just those men (and wymmin) who own, run, staff and are bribed by the oligarchs' structures of power (banks, media and political parties).

Bear this in mind dear reader:

We are getting a referendum-vote on the AV voting system in the UK in May, which even its chief promoter (the Lib Dems' Nick Clegg) said was a "miserable little compromise," yet 'we' were never (in the 50s, 60s, 70s etc.) given a referendum on the decision to let in millions of non-whites which changed our millennia-old society almost overnight, which destroyed whole communities, which changed our religious identity, and so much more (let's not even dissect street crime, gun crime, drug crime etc.).

Ask yourself this:

• Which is of more importance to us as the peoples of these isles? Which has more impact on our lives, on our communities, on our children? Which has more impact on the safety of the elderly?
• Which is of more importance to the Bilderberg/Rothschild marionette traitors in parliament? Or the cocaine-using sexual degenerates in the media?

To answer these questions gives the answer to our present malaise.

Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our father.

GK Chesterton, Orthodoxy

* yes - I'm living the dream! It''s that rock n roll lifestyle again.
** Come on! It was 5.45am and I wasn't taking notes!

Tolerance for Turks - But Decapitation 'Back Home'

Tolerance is a joke: it means we must accept all that is wrong and against the family (like degenerate homosexuality, its drug-culture and its death-culture), all that is alien to our European Christian civilisation, and all that destroys the future of our children, denying them the White, European, Christian nationhood and cultures that our forefathers enjoyed.

We have St Stephen Lawrence, raised on high for us all to feel guilty about, yet Kriss Donald the Scottish lad who was stabbed repeatedly and set on fire for being White by an Asian gang, is barely known outside of Glasgow.

Right: Imran Shahid, the murderer of Kriss Donald expresses his remorse: not.

This is the hypocrisy of the media!

Our people count for nothing! Our heritage counts for nothing. Our cultures count for nothing.

The family is under constant attack. Homosexuals and drug users (George Michael, Elton John, Boy George, Stephen Fry etc. etc.) are lauded by a sick media, appearing time and time again as role models, yet if you dare to question the benefits of multi-culti in even the slightest way you will be ostracised and lose your media job (Carol Thatcher and Brian True-May).

Our Christian heritage is attacked by left-wing councils with their humanist, atheist agenda and by a government and system so intent on passing law after law after law giving ever more "rights" to degenerate sodomites, they have forced the shut-down of Catholic adoption agencies and are even stopping Owen and Eunice Johns (a black couple) from fostering children between the ages of 5 and 8, because the couple oppose homosexuality!

In the age of Elton John and David Furnesh having an (IVF) "gayby" on Christmas Day (oh happy chance!) which the media gushed over as if it were the Second Coming with barely a contrary word spoken, we have to wonder what the hell this country is coming to.

If you are White, heterosexual, Christian and part of a traditional family it seems that you, as far as the media and the government are concerned, have no rights.

I remember when the Tories promoted the idea of giving a tax break to married couples (don't get too excited, it would doubtless include homosexuals) and the Labour politicians were up in arms that "x" pounds a week would not make people get married, not keep a marriage together if it were about to break.

Yet the same politicians see nothing wrong in giving financial inducements to couples to make them live apart, or to have them cohabit and not get married, never mind the whole con that is young single mums getting homes, benefits etc. when they should still be living with their parents, going to school etc. (and don't say the system isn't abused because everyone knows that it is) whilst the married couples obey the rules and pay the taxes that go to the single mums, the immigrants fresh off the planes, and the fat cat bankers who wrecked the economy and are already on the bonus gravy train with barely a gap in the money-grubbing.

It's the same old story isn't it?

Peter Hitchens was on the BBC's 'This Week' recently calling for policemen to be on the beat again, preventing crime, making the streets safe, acting like public servants, instead of rushing around in speeding cars to mop up after-the-fact, being tooled up like paramilitaries, and treating the public as a nuisance.

How right he was.

It's the same mentality again. We live in a society where crime is so endemic much of it just doesn't get reported any more. If you are burgled you get a crime reference number for the insurers and little more. Unless your name is Tony Blair or Elizabeth Regina, don't expect the scenes of crime squad dusting for finger prints. meanwhile mums doing 34mph on a deserted road at 10.30 in the morning get clocked and fined.

Criminals are just so much hard work, busy mums struggling to make ends meet are an easy target.

It's just another aspect of our society that is out of kilter.

If only we had a politician like that Austrian in the you tube clip - prepared to speak out, defend our rights, call a spade a spade.

At the moment even the patriotic movement here is imploding with tales of granny-porn stars, British businesses owed monies (in this economic climate!) whilst degenerates are employed on some gravy train scam.

The people who should be making a difference and exposing the corruption, the rampant usury, the con this is multi-culturalism, the non-European wrecks that are our cities, the out of control pink mafia - and much more, are the ones embroiled in degeneracy, expenses fiddling and all the sleaze we expect from bankers, MPs, and media-stars.

Things don't look good.

"Tolerance" is on the march and wiping out all before it. Will anyone make a stand for decency, for the family, for the tax-payers, for the Christians, for the poor bloody people who make up the bulk of the normal, White workers of these island nations?

Why do the Media and Politicians Lie About the Threats we Face?

Successive governments of every hue have told us that the protection of our citizens is number one priority.

That is why, we are informed, that it was so vital that we take part in the newspeak "War on Terror."

Right: "Can we watch multi-culti, pro-homosexual Eastenders after the news Dad?"

Never mind that it could be argued that our taking on the Israeli-American foreign policy puts more of our people (here and especially overseas) in peril, let us look more closely at who our people need protection from.

1. Who is behind the terror attacks?

There is eye-witness evidence that Israeli Mossad agents brought down the twin towers and were "on the ground" in NYC when "911" took place. Eye-witnesses saw Israelis with a hire-van celebrating. The same hire-van was stopped by police whose explosive sniffer-dogs went haywire by the tunnel linking NYC with New Jersey. A story even leaked of a foiled terror attack on the NYC-NJ tunnel on the same day, before being silenced. The arrested Israelis were released without charge.

Or even without this proof, we can ask ourselves Quid Pro Quo. Who has the most to gain from "911" - a CIA established extremist Islamic group whose bases were destroyed? Or the Israeli war machine who achieved a turn-around in US policy (from non-interventionist to Neo Can war hawks) and had two anti-Israeli regimes turned to dust (not least revenge was taken out on the Scud-firing Iraq).

Ask yourself this: Who had the most to gain from the attacks and why has the evidence of Israeli involvement never been fairly discussed?

2. What kills more of our people every year?

If the duty of our government is to protect our people, why are they getting dragged (or running into!) foreign wars of a Neo-Con hawk nature when they cannot keep our own people safe on the streets of Britain?

David Cameron is showing his true Neo Con colours by urging military action against Libya. Another war for foreign interests alien to our own? Cameron is proving to be Blair mark II.

Meanwhile ask yourself this, in the last 10 years:

• How many British people got mugged or burgled (inc unreported cases)?
• How many British people got hooked on heroin?
• How many British people had their homes repossessed?
• How many British people lost decent jobs and have to scrape to make ends meet in McJobs or part-time employment with few rights?

and compare that to the number of British people murdered, injured etc. by "international terrorism."

I would suggest that more British people have been harmed by the banksters and their greed, or by the police who refuse to practice zero tolerance against muggers, burglars and dealers than have ever been harmed by any 'Axis of Evil,' Islamicist extremists etc.

3. And finally: who do our government obey?

If there is evidence that Israelis were (at the very least) involved in "911" and were active with explosives in NYC on the same day; if the Israelis had most to gain from the 'War on Terror'; if more British people have their lives taken, ruined or greatly disturbed by organised and petty criminals in the UK (especially English inner cities); why do successive governments pretend that their first priority is to protect UK citizens?

Why are we being lied to?

Why is our foreign policy being propped up by a huge lie?

Why is our domestic policy to let hundreds every day fall victim to robbery, violence and worse?

I don't want a police state, and I would argue that the 60s liberal experiment (and the explosion of single-parent families) and mass immigration has ruined communities to such an effect that many people no longer know right from wrong, no longer care for justice, for duty, for respect.

However, having a police force that actually deals with complaints of mugging, or burglary, or drug-taking and drug-pushing instead of worrying about if homosexuals can stay in hotels -- might that not be a good start?

Left: You think it's bad here? The US media is screamingly pro-Zionist and its two-party state is sewn up by the Israeli lobby. They pump billions into foreign wars and Israeli weaponry, whilst many of their own inner cities are war zones and are awash with drugs.

Don't expect the media or politicians to worry about this though. They are mostly pro-Israeli, many of them snort cocaine, most of them don't live in 'multi-culti' hell-holes or single-parent family sink estates and when it comes to 60s liberalism most of them are queer-friendly.

In short, nothing is set to change because the media, politicians and for that matter the banksters too form a circle of dependence. They are in each-others pockets and while they will justify all manner of foreign adventures to "protect British people" the very idea of actually protecting British people is anathema to them.

The other day I read an article about the efforts to get a foreign type of prawn out of a freshwater site because it was ruining the habitat of native species. Specialists, politicians and the media were involved and interested in catching and killing this alien threat to indigenous species.

Yet when have we ever had "specialists, politicians and the media" warn us of the effects of mass immigration? Habitats (eg the white communities of inner London) were decimated and destroyed in decades.

Today the politicians and media gurus will tell us how successful immigration has been.

Do you see it yet?

Whether it's the "War on Terror," crime, drugs, liberalism, homosexuality, abortion - you can virtually pick the topic at will! - this ruling elite does not have our interests at heart.

For them to pretend otherwise is sick in the extreme.

As the Skrewdriver song stated in the wake of the immigrant murder of the elderly patriot Albert Marriner in the early 80s: Now look at a sick society... Do we seriously think it's got better?

Christmas Day: And the Evil Sodomites Plan Unravels

According to reports the sodomite 'couple' Elton John and David Furnish arranged for "their" baby to be born on Christmas Day.

Some might say this was an ostentatious Christmas present, others might point to a more sinister reasoning. After all, Reg Dwight (John) has publicly said he would like all those opposed to homosexuality put on an island and a bomb dropped on them.

He may be many things, but he's no fool. He knows most Christians are opposed to homosexuality, and he knows that Christmas Day and the birth of Christ is a special Feast Day for Christians throughout the world.

Now every Christmas the 'flamboyant' pair will make the news on the latest extravagance foisted on their spoilt brat.

Our only hope is that the spoilt brat rebels and opposes sodomites with every fibre in his body!

But seriously, why is this issue important to nationalists?

a. Because some nationalists seem to think it is "OK" to have homosexuals in our ranks, thus making us no different from all the establishment lackeys.
b. Because unless we as nationalists make a stand against this kind of degeneracy and rank hypocrisy we will absolutely see the end of 2000 years of "Western", Christian civilisation -- given over to the Masonic powers who want to corrupt our societies completely.

While the media, political parties, Hollywood etc. promote homosexuality, we cannot hope to stop immigration, stamp out drug abuse etc. because all these moral diseases are inextricably linked (if only because homosexuals - especially in the media - are behind attacks on nationalism and Christianity, and behind the promotion of drugs, immigration etc).

We, as a society, are rotting away from within whilst these cancers spread -- destroying the lives of countless victims and ripping apart communities -- and we have a duty to oppose the cancers and speak out for what is absolutely right.

In doing so people will thank us for offering a true alternative devoid of drugs, sodomites, mass immigration and much else besides.

Druggies Losing Benefits - Good, But Not Enough

I awoke this morning, and before I could slide on my monogrammed FC slippers the radio was informing me of the Home Office's decision to reintroduce a NuLab idea of stopping benefits (state hand outs) to drug addicts who refuse treatment to get them off their addiction.

I concur.

I think this is a good start. But it's not enough.

It's not that I'm like the liberals who lined up on the radio to rail against the forceful nature of the moves -- I think sometimes you need a touch of tough love, especially with people with real problems who cannot help themselves and will lie, even to their closest relatives, to keep getting their fixes.

Furthermore we should also remember that just as they are victims -- so are the rest of us. From the small shop keeper who gets his goods stolen, to the child who plays in the park near used needles, and the many others who suffer from the crime and degenerate nature of drug addiction.

We deserve help too - and forcing druggies to go through cold turkey (or whatever else) can only help all of us.

However.

This will all be a complete waste of time, effort and money if there is no support structure for these people (all someones brother, son etc.) to enable them to stay 'clean' once they go through their treatment.

Unless this action is universal, there will be druggie circles waiting to embrace them and reintroduce them to the 'joys' of addiction within weeks of being reintroduced to society.

Furthermore, unless we as a society crack down mercilessly on drugs and especially the dealers and importers of this scourge right across the board, then new addicts will quickly be created, to be joined by the ex-junkies at any given stage.

Unless this move is joined by an absolute and unconditional Crusade Against Drugs, it is just more tinkering around the edges, with no long term vision to help the sad individuals hooked on drugs and the rest of us who suffer the consequences.

Indeed those conspiratorially minded might say it is being done deliberately to show there is 'no answer' so that heroin et al can be 'legalised.'

This idea of stopping benefits, as with so many things initially promoted by NuLab is, I fear, more about winning Daily Mail accolades, and less about offering real solutions to communities and families that have been all but destroyed by the cancer of drug abuse.

I would hope intelligent government ministers (most have more qualifications than I) would join the dots and see that we need an all-embracing, universal move to help the addicts and crack down mercilessly on the pushers.

I don't think I'll hold my breath though.

A very good friend and comrade of mine helps drug addicts on the streets. He has got many through bad times, helped them get accommodation, has learnt that many of them are good people, thrown into the lion's den through bad companions or bad events. He helped one particular pour soul get clean (amongst others). He was a good man with a very sad back story. Then he went off and a short while later was found dead from drugs.

You see those who got him hooked, wanted him back on the drugs. This basically good man was just trash to them, and then he was limp with lifeless eyes, his life wasted, his future gone. Another person's son was dead, full of injection holes. Another life given over to crime and drug abuse.

Unless we create a situation wherein we can release these people into a society free from drugs, where he and those like him can't be preyed on by other junkies or the pushers, and where they can be helped by those who believe in a second chance, then in so many cases they will go back to the substance that has a strange love-hate hold over their lives.

At the moment the good work, the demanding work, the heart-breaking work of those like my friend who fight seemingly against all hope, are like King Canute trying to hold back the tide (I know he did it to prove he couldn't before anyone writes in).

They are good people fighting an oncoming tide of evil.

They deserve better, the junkies deserve better, society deserves better. The pushers deserve the rope.

As with the banking usury that has thrown people on the dole on a generational basis, or the mass immigration that has destroyed traditional white working class communities, the powers-that-be do not care about "the people." That much is obvious.

They all claim to be Christian, yet Christ showed the example of moving amongst the destitute in society, to help them and show true compassion and true charity.

The politicians move through a world of mega-rich bankers, celebrities, big egos, large wallets, vacuous, rich men.

Outside of short photo opportunities which they are whisked to and from in their luxurious chauffeur driven cars, these people know nothing of the underworld inhabited by the junkies.

Unless and until we strike out against drugs in a meaningful way nothing will change. No mercy against the pushers, true compassion and tough love towards the junkies.

That much is obvious.

If nationalists promote this -- as with usury-free banking and tax-free local government -- I sincerely believe we can show the people that we are the only force for Social Justice. We are the only people who truly care for our people.

Unlike the politicians we shouldn't do this to win headlines, we should do this to win hearts and minds, and to save society from a disaster that it is currently sleepwalking towards.

What War on Drugs?

This week yet another boffin "expert" has said that we should decriminalise drugs which are currently illegal, such as marijuana, cocaine and heroin.

The media reported it as "the war on drugs" failing.

What war on drugs?

Drugs are endemic in our society and while our beloved government (c'mon guys I'm being ironic) wastes billions in needless foreign Zionist wars, and trillions on the banking-debt swindle, the pushers are out there wrecking our nations, communities, families and individual lives.

Drugs not only wreck those who take them, they result in a plethora of crimes including theft, burglary, violence etc.

So whilst politicians waffle on about protecting our people from 'terrorists' on the streets it is organised crime and scum that ruin whole communities.

Where is the war on drugs?

They know who the pushers are, they know where the gangs hang out.

Let's have some zero tolerance. The army would do more good patrolling South London than patrolling Helmand.

I don't believe in a police state, but if we want to crack down on the pushers and eradicate heroin and the like - then we should show the drugs gangs, importers and pushers no mercy!

In a war you kill the enemy until the remnant surrenders or gives up.

So where is this war on drugs?

We should start by bringing back capital punishment for the dealers. No tolerance.

Sweep pubs, clubs, workplaces (including parliament!) with sniffer dogs.

Random drugs tests in all positions of responsibility (police, army, councils, schools etc.).

If the liberal elite, degenerate snorters and vested interests want to claim the "war on drugs" has failed then let's have a real war on drugs.

Let's shut down the peddlers of death, run the gangs that pollute the cities and towns off the streets, and clamp down on all drug use -- whilst showing real compassion to the victims of the peddlers.

We need a Crusade Against Drugs.

Real terror and fear for the pushers and importers, tempered by real compassion and help for the victims.

If we want to clean up our society this is the only way.

Decriminalising illegal drugs will only create more junkies, kill more people, ruin more lives.

It may make the lives of policemen and officials easier, but is that why we create laws? To justify liberal intelligentsia or clear the in-trays of chief constables (so they can catch more mums doing 34mph in a 30mph zone)?

No-one wants to give the State -- especially this State -- any extra powers, but if we are to beat drugs then we must take action!

I would be happy to see a whole range of other needless laws overturned, and the targeting of normal. law-abiding, people just to raise money or make it look like they are catching criminals stop.

Ending the drug endemic would stop a huge proportion of crime anyway.

But there you go!

The politicians would rather waste money on Zionist wars, and usury-banksters, and waste government time tinkering around the edges, passing laws for faggots, blethering about global warming etc. etc.

All the while real problems (like immigration and drugs) wreck communities in formerly proud communities in regions as diverse as Glasgow, South Wales, East London, Notts, Manchester and so on.

Rome is burning.

Should we get out our fiddles? Or call the fire brigade?

At the moment parliament is full of Neros.

'Twas ever thus.

Lessons from Guernsey and the Isle of Mann

When the example of Guernsey* is given on how a society can be all-but tax free, some say that the size of Guernsey makes it easier to achieve there than on, say, an English or Scottish scale.

I disagree. The geography is bigger, the population bigger, the monies larger and so on - but the scale means that the problem is bigger too, hence the remedy is needed more than ever.

This is also one of my pet hates with patriotic candidates standing for election. Why on earth don't they propose local remedies to council tax?

I have always said that if any patriotic elected representatives were in the position to remove taxation by breaking free of usury banking they would be classed as national heroes. For a nationalist to prove that nationalism -- not Communism/Socialism -- has the answer to deliver our peoples from taxation and debt, would put the traitor parties forever in the shade.

But what of other matters?

This week I was talking to a Manxman about his homeland. He made it clear that even though the island's government was forced to change their law which had hitherto made homosexuality a punishable offence, the islanders would not tolerate things such as homosexual clubs and those found to engage in lewd acts in public conveniences** and suchlike faced public ostracism.

What a breath of fresh air to find common decency, community norms and family values being given free reign.

Another example he gave me was the total clamp down on drugs on the island. Even those attending the TT Race (annual motorbike event on the island) were regularly swept by sniffer dogs and even those found with a minute amount of "recreational" drugs would be locked up for the duration of the event.

I do not understand why our own authorities cannot act in this way. The death grip of liberalism, especially on local government, seems to mean that homosexuality and drug abuse are tolerated at best, promoted at worst.

Why do the authorities worry about catching mums on their way to the shops doing 34mph in a 30mph zone, rather than shutting down those who deal drugs in our communities?

Why does parliament find no time to pass laws that we desperately need (tackling immigration, corruption etc.) but finds plenty of time to pass law after law after law giving concessions to the homosexual death-culture?

Our law-makers and representatives seem to find no problem in, on the one hand, keeping us enslaved to mega-rich rulers of the universe so we are taxed up to the eye-balls for ever worsening 'services,' yet at the same time they find all the time to liberalise society on matters of morality.

Something stinks.

This is not how we want it. It is not how our forefathers want it.

We seem to being shafted on an ongoing basis, generation by generation.

In our children's or grandchildren's age the whole rotten society will be financially and morally bankrupt in the extreme, unless someone starts offering solutions in a sensible and attractive way to topple the stranglehold of the Masonic party bosses and media moguls who sell us out to all the sick vested interests.



*To find out more about Guernsey's struggle against debt and taxes, and how they broke free, read The Guernsey Experiment available from FC.
** Believe it or not but this act (aka "cottaging") is de rigueur in the homosexual death-culture.

Was Cilla Black an Anti-Semite? Are Drug Dealers Rats?

There I was this morning settling down to enjoy my Marmite on toast with a patriotic British cuppa.

Right: How hatred begins. Look at the idealistic Aryan faces. The traditional clothing. Where are the coloureds? Why no trousers sinking down to reveal boxer shorts? This picture of an Aryan Liverpool is surely how the long trail of hate began, culminating in talk of dirty "dustbun lids."

Imagine my shock and horror when after a brief introduction, a Cilla Black song (Liverpool Lullaby) came on the radio with the words:

Oh you are a mucky kid
Dirty as a dustbin lid
When he hears the things that you did
You'll get a belt from yer dad

Now I don't know about Jewish involvement in the belt industry -- but they were allegedly known for being furriers (I had an historic anti-furrier poster in the 80s, I think produced by the BUAV though someone will confirm/deny I hope, with a very hook nosed evil furrier holding a blood drenched fur coat).

Furrier to leather belt producer? Hmmm.

Anyway, I digress. Back to the song.

Everyone knows that in East End parlance a "dustbin lid" was a derogatory term used against Jewish people. Dustbin lid = Yid.

So was Cilla Black (real name Precilla White!) sending out a hidden message in her song (pre-Led Zep and all that) against dustbin lids?

Or have I been watching too many conspiracy DVDs?


Next week: How Freddie Mercury's Moustache started the AIDS epidemic in Africa aided by the reptilian royal family.



P.S. You think I'm mad? Theodore Dalrymple writing in the loss-making leftist New Statesman complained when the Blairite government published its anti-drug dealer "Rat on a Rat" poster because he said the implication of comparing a human being with a rat was basically National Socialist (=evil nazis). Yes, shock horror, Mr. Theodore Dalrymple thinks that drug dealers are indeed 'human beings' and no doubt they have 'ooman rights' too (starting with not being compared to Jews, er, I mean rats). Officer: that last statement, as per the entire article, is meant to be humourous. I know Jews are not rats. They don't have four legs or tails. And some of my best friends are rats. If anyone else is upset by this article, please find a sense of humour immediately.

Diabolical Labour Promotes Homosexuality in Schools: Time to Fight Back

Oh joy. Oh rapture.

As many Labour MPs assume they are on their way out of parliament (this weekend's Tory poll slide aside) -- indeed many are leaving anyway thanks to fiddled expenses -- and a government in decline and internally riven, what do they find time to do?

We have yet another law passed to promote homosexuality!

Just how many laws has this government passed to promote homosexuality?

They always tell us there is a dearth of time for laws that we actually need, yet they seem to find the time to pass law after law after law in favour of homosexuality.

We now find ourselves in a position where homosexuality has to be promoted in schools (from a stance of its promotion being banned under Thatcher, then the ban being lifted in the late 90s), as well as the common "age of consent" (which poof militants are already agitating to reduce - even to the age of nine!).

Right: The Outrage leader Peter Tatchell said that homosexual sex with nine-year-olds is acceptable. The faggots will never stop agitating for more "rights" and have friends in power. We have to be just as forthright in opposing their degenerate liberal agenda. As if proof were needed, this poof is demonstrating outside a Tory pro-poof meeting -- proving that the more you try to accommodate the homosexual agenda, the more "rights" they demand. These people want our children to be faggots. It is we who should be outraged!

We have also had the outrage that is "civil partnership" - already commonly referred to as "marriage" in the media, with heretical and diabolical liberal "churches" lining up to allow homosexual "marriages" (sic).

Britain is on its knees.

There is no morality, we live in a state that is passing from being amoral to being arrogantly immoral. How can a state which demands the promotion of homosexuality to our children hope to gain our obedience? It could be argued that under this immoral state we have a duty of civil disobedience.

Anything goes (except racism, "homophobia," anti-Semitism etc.) is the law of the land . The Crowleyesque "Do what thou wilt" is the mantra of the state. The state tells us what (in their eyes) is acceptable, and as long as we make "informed choices" -- based on their slanted immorality -- then that is fine.

Sex education - now a homosexual-friendly sex ed - is pushed as the answer, yet sex ed has done nothing so far but increase the number of teenage single mums and the number of abortions.

The "do what thou wilt" mentality is at the core of sex ed. Sleep around, as long as you use contraception. Be a poof if it floats your boat. Experiment! You might prefer one form of 'sexuality' over another - and so on, ad so forth.

This kind of sexual chaos and amoral mire results in more children having no sense of right from wrong. And they wonder why more children take drugs, why more children turn to drink, why more young girls get pregnant, and why more girls have abortions.

More amorality and immorality means more sex, means more pregnancies, means more abortions.

We are wrecking the youth of the country. They are being weaned on a code of loveless sex, kill a baby and walk away when you want. Irresponsibility is the watch-word of the "do what thou wilt" era.

The recent report on a sexualised youth told us nothing we didn't already know. The media promotes this liberal agenda, and politicians mimic it through the liberal laws they pass, and the anti-family agenda in schools makes it 'official'.

They create the mess, they create a generation that thinks marriage is passé, or that fidelity is an outmoded norm. Absentee fathers become very close to the norm in more communities, not just in the black urban sub-culture. Young girls either get pregnant to gain a home and live off state handouts for life, or go through abortuaries with all the psychological, mental and metaphysical damage that undoubtedly does (post abortion syndrome being a medically recognised result for many). And more youngsters take drugs to escape reality.

There is a mess born out of 60s liberal individualism (sexual amorality) and moral relativism ("informed choices") which has mingled freely with free market economics (greed is good) and Thatcherite individualism (community is dead).

This mess is worsened every time the government passes a liberalising law such as that which makes it mandatory for schools to promote homosexuality as a valid "lifestyle choice" (sic).

True, they had to add an addenda permitting 'faith schools' (Protestant, Catholic, Muslim and Jewish) from doing so within the remit of their faith/culture (a move that has enraged liberals, faggots and humanists who seek total surrender) but those schools will still have to teach/promote a deathstyle which goes contrary not just to most religions, but to natural justice, healthcare, and common sense.

And they wonder why the growth in immorality, the growth in drug use, the growth in absentee fathers continues apace.

Don't they realise these are symptoms of the amoral malaise born of an anti-Christian worldview?

They clearly cannot realise that 2 + 2 = 4 because they are proponents of that worldview and the current system is their baby. That is why, even as the system, the nation, communities and families worsen as a rule, their only answer is to fling around ever more liberal laws and liberal platitudes.

They cannot fix it because it would mean betraying their worldview. They would have to acknowledge - left and right - that they have been wrong and that, horror of horrors, those who say that homosexuality, drug abuse, sexual promiscuity et al is wrong and that marriage, fidelity, loyalty to nation, duty in the community et al are, and always have been, correct.

As I have said before, the Tories will not fix the problem.

They already say that they support "civil partnerships" and with even groups like the BNP turning a blind-eye to known and practicing homosexuals in their party (because, for one thing, they give a lot of money) is there any political party that can offer an answer?

Perhaps not. Perhaps that is another strata of the problem. The Masonic political party circus, corralled by a media elbow deep in the amoral mess, will never have the gumption to grab the bull by the horns for fear of losing any media support.

The American move towards "tea party politics" may offer us a short term answer. There is little doubt that local activists, local community members, resolved to rid the community of drugs, of the creeps who hang around public conveniences, of council money wasted on gay helplines etc. can have an impact.

The Third Positionist idea of taking power back from the streets, from local areas, can have an impact. Local councillors who reflect community feeling (and not answerable to Islington elites with their liberal, homosexual agenda) can, if backed up by a strong local voice, have the gumption to make areas free of the cancer that spreads from Westminster.

If we are to avoid the UK plc, and its constituent nations, plunging into an abyss then we have to start a fightback, where we can, how we can.

It's St David's Day tomorrow, and the Welsh patron saint had a saying which he spread amongst the people. His message of 'do the little things well'* can be taken for our own in politics, community life etc.

If we take St David's example, he did the little things well, kept Christianity alive (during the Dark Ages), from its days in the Roman Empire, spread to Ireland from the Welsh slave St Patrick, spread from Ireland via St Columba to the Picts and from there into Northumbria.

All these places in turn spread monastacism, learning, agricultural knowledge, care for the poor and infirm and grounded all of Britain in Christianity with a direct link from Roman times to today.

So for us today it could well be that by "doing the little things well" we can, in our communities, in our schools, in our churches, in our youth centres, in our councils... we can keep morality alive, despite the worst efforts of the Westminster traitors and the vested interests they serve.

On the eve of St David's Day, it is a message everyone, regardless of their situation can employ.

If you or I fail to do that, then the enemy has won and will deserve to win, for if we acquiesce as one more child injects their first hit of heroin, as one more child is snared by the homosexual deathstyle, as one more young adult is persuaded to kill its unborn child, as one more child is left fatherless by some degenerate who walks out on it, then we are no better than the people who have created the system that allows all this and much more to happen.

You and I cannot and should not have that on our conscience.

Our willingness to revolt against a rotten system and its liberal agenda by promoting morality and family life however we can is what will save us as people, as communities and as nations.

As G.K. Chesterton said:

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions,”

and we should not and cannot tolerate what goes against every grain of decency.

By doing the small things well, we can make a difference, and the larger things may well, God willing, fall into place.






* St David said:

"be joyful, and keep your faith and your creed. Do those little things that you have seen me do and heard about."

More BBC Anti-Semitism?

One for the EDL's version of plastic patriots to get wound-up about:

Link

Rabbi Snorted Coke

FC Poll: Drugs & the Nationalist Cause

Should Druggies, Users, Suppliers and Those with Drugs Convictions be in the Nationalist Cause?

Yes 2 (4%)

No 33 (75%)

Only if They Publicly Recant 9 (20%)

Don't Know/Care 0 (0%)

A Cartoon That Very Nearly Never Appeared! And it's Not About Mohammed!

Here's one of the funniest comedy songs! Listen out for "even though they killed my Lord."

Priceless!



Sadly it's without the video/cartoon footage, but you can see that on the following clip.

This one has the series creator performing the song live. Listen to the audience howl with laughter!




This episode caused such affront to the TV execs (imagine!) that it nearly never saw the light of day.

And one more for the road - "You Have AIDS." Enjoy.

The Culture of Greed & the Need for Absolute Change

MORE CORRUPTION - MORE EXCUSES

TO COIN A PHRASE: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

A Sunday newspaper has alleged that "our" Home Secretary - Jaqcui Smith - is fiddling the system, by classing her sister's house in London as her "London Home" (when she could use a free government one, apparently there's a few standing empty) so she can get circa £30K a year.

Right: Just because they work in the Palace of Westminster, doesn't give our politicians to act like Royalty, escaping censure at every turn with a feeble excuse or a half-hearted apology.

This is designed so MPs in Scotland, Cumbria, Northern Ireland, Newcastle and areas too far away to be able to commute can work at Westminster and have somewhere to stay/live when not in their constituencies; not so that MPs (or ministers!) with constituencies nearby can - allegedly - fiddle the system and - allegedly - pocket tens of thousands of pounds.

Some time ago I wrote a review of Justin Barrett's book The National Way Forward (see link below for Reds' ranting against Barrett). In this book the Irish Pro-Lifer and Nationalist argues that "targeting" dole cheats is a bit of a sop to public opinion and "populism" wherein the real problem lies with the international financiers and big businesses that fiddle tax and fiddle bonuses etc.

He was and is right.

No-one is suggesting that dole cheats or long-term 'dole bums' should be ignored, rather we should work to ensure workers get a fair wage for a job done well, because there is a mentality of "the world owes me a living for ding nothing" in some sections of the community.

However, the millions mis-spent on housing benefit etc. (which should be overhauled) pales into insignificance when compared to the billions swindled by the banksters, financiers, big businessmen and MPs.

Two wrongs do not make a right, but when the people at the top are fiddling expenses and filling their pockets, should we be surprised when the people at the bottom do the same?

The system needs a total overhaul (national revolution - not national reform!) because the people at the top do not only do this illegally, as in the alleged case of Miss Smith, they do it by dancing around the rules and employing legal people to find them the loopholes and a way of breaking the rules whilst staying "within" the law.
The trickle-down effect of corruption is there for all to see.

When this government rails against dole cheats and corruption it comes across as dishonest as when they talk of "citizens' safety" when funding the latest American/Zionist initiative, whilst ignoring street crime, drugs gangs, muggers and the people who put us all at risk on a daily basis.

In the case of the bankers it is doubly galling because not only have these people failed - and still claim mega-buck bonuses - but many of the banks are now all-but government owned, and it is the failed polices and short-term profiteering of those banks which have put hundreds of thousands of people in the real shadow of terror: the terror of losing jobs, losing homes, losing marriages and more!

These are no CIA/Mossad "ghost" terrors: these are real terrors being faced today by tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of workers and small businessmen in the UK.

The American profiteers who made billions and caused the whole "sub-prime" debacle and "credit crunch" may be beyond the reach of the justice system here (being Americans!) but those within its reach are getting... millions of pounds in bonuses!

The dole cheats who are caught are fined. The MPs and bankers who fiddle the system - all "legal" of course! - to line their pockets are... well, they are just allowed to carry on and find more loopholes.

It reminds me of a situation some 15 or so years ago. A police station in a largish English town where I was living was raided because a number of the policemen there were taking drugs. A friend who worked in a pub near the police station had told me a couple of times that the police would regularly go to the pub after work and "smoke pot."

Ah the halcyon (not halogen!) days, when smoking in pubs was legal, and smoking cannabis in public wasn't!!!

You see the problem there, dear reader?

How can a police force full of those illegally taking drugs be expected to tackle crime in a town, especially when a good proportion of the crime is drug fuelled?

The sense of hypocrisy was and still is overpowering!

It is exactly the same sense of hypocrisy I sense today when I read of bankers bonuses, and the allegations against Lords and MPs in Parliament who fiddle the system to make wonga!

It may seem like a pipe dream -- but why the hell should it be? -- but until we overhaul the system and learn to put people in positions of power that put the Common Good before self-enrichment, this constant circus of traitors who sell-out to the bankers and leave our people in perpetual debt-and-taxation will continue evermore.

Certainly the current raft of "opposition" (whether "right" or "left," liberal or conservative, "centrist" or "extremist") seems to be the 'same old, same old' busily filling their pockets right now (aka 'Doing the Tel Aviv Breaststroke') , so are we to think they would be any different once they get a hold of the "expense account" of UK plc? Not on your nelly!

The bankers would just have another raft of career politicians waiting to fill their pockets at the peoples' expense.

Perhaps the answer lies in the old 80s NF position of peoples' representatives - a system of government a bit like corporatism (but in the sense that it shied away from Big Brother stateism, retaining the Small is Beautiful property dispersal of Distributism). They called it Popular Rule, a name I personally never liked because it can sometimes sound like an East German spin on stateism or an American Democrat faux populism.

The NF published a little on it, but I think it was too little (coming at a time of fast change, state repression, split and decline in the NF), and it really should be studied by some think tank or similar to work out the intricacies, nuances and break-down of the facts and figures -- hey, if someone wants to stick me on a wage I'll do it! ;-).

Government would be made up of local community representatives, trades representatives (from car-makers to doctors), experts in their fields etc. -- thus breaking Parliament free of the vice-like grip of lawyers and party stooges.

The "second chamber" would have to be designed in such a way to retain its current role as a control against bad laws or wrong-doing by Parliament. Perhaps it could be made up of experts in their fields, with a smattering of appointees from communities, clergymen and similar that have proven themselves to be excellent servants of the people.

Over both chambers there would need to be a ban on sinecures such as those we currently see ad nauseum from banks, energy providers, big businesses, lobbying groups etc. The wage, the sense of public duty etc. should be enough!

All the representatives would be answerable to the bodies that elect them - whether areas of the country, trade bodies etc. and so if they do not act decently and honestly they could be recalled at any time.

A Parliament that reflects the people, drawing from all communities, all classes, all professions? Parliamentarians that have to behave decently?

Now that would be revolutionary!


Link:
Communists in Ireland fume about Justin Barrett
Corporatism

BBC Gollywog Hypocrisy & "Boy George"

An update on the previous story.

The day after the degenerate George O'Dowd (aka Boy George) was convicted and jailed for holding a "Gay" male escort hostage (I didn't read the details, but I understand it was pretty sordid) his music was still being played on BBC radio stations!

Right: Convicted pervert and deranged homosexual 'Boy George' O'Dowd. His illegal and offensive antics have not prevented his music being played on the BBC - from which he earns money.

The BBC is happy to play the music (for which the artists get paid) of degenerate criminals like Boy George O'Dowd and George Michael (arrested for lewd acts and drugs), sending a message to the youth and others that degenerate, illegal behaviour linked with homosexuality and drugs is "acceptable" to the BBC.

Perhaps if the deranged faggot O'Dowd had merely mentioned the word Gollywog, instead of kidnapping and tying-up a homosexual prostitute, his music might be banned from the BBC.

What a mad world.

FC Poll Result on Drugs & Nationalists

Can a Nationalist Who Takes Drugs:

Be perfectly acceptable?	4 (13%)
Be given "Three strikes and you're out"?	3 (10%)
Be ostracised by the movement?	21 (70%)
...I don't care.	2 (6%)

Olympic Shame: Drugs Test Dodger Gets Gold Medal

Christine Ohuruogu wins a gold medal for the UK (sorry... "Team GB").

Right: She's here legally and so for the BNP Christine Ohuruogu is a decent, patriotic Briton!

This was the person banned for "missing" three drugs tests.

Sorry but if Dwayne Chambers is rightly banned from Olympics for life for failing a test, then so should Christine Ohuruogu for choosing to miss three of them!

This sends all the wrong messages to the young, and the BBC et al are hypocrites for celebrating Christine Ohuruogu's medal so prominently!

You can be sure her phisog will be all over our multi-culti ethnic-hugging newspapers' front pages tomorrow.

What a way to push home the message that drugs = mugs!