Reporter feels mob's hate in the Holy City
'Humiliated and degraded'
By Anne Barker
ABC News July 6, 2009 (updated July 7)
JERUSALEM -- ABC's Middle East correspondent Anne Barker became caught
in violent street protests involving ultra-Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem at
the weekend. This is her graphic account of her ordeal.
As a journalist I've covered more than my share of protests. Political
protests in Canberra (Australia). Unions protesting for better
conditions. Angry, loud protests against governments, or against
perceived abuses of human rights.
I've been at violent rallies in East Timor. I've had rocks and metal
darts thrown my way. I've come up against riot police.
But I have to admit no protest - indeed no story in my career - has
distressed me in the way I was distressed at a protest in Jerusalem on
Saturday (July 4) involving several hundred ultra-Orthodox Jews. This
particular protest has been going on for weeks.
Orthodox Jews are angry at the local council's decision to open a
municipal carpark on Saturdays - or Shabbat, the day of rest for Jews.
It's a day when Jews are not supposed to do anything resembling work,
which can include something as simple as flicking a switch, turning on a
light or driving.
So even opening a simple carpark to accommodate the increasing number of
tourists visiting Jerusalem's Old City is highly offensive to Orthodox
Jews because it's seen as a desecration of the Shabbat, by encouraging
people to drive.
I was aware that earlier protests had erupted into violence on previous
weekends - Orthodox Jews throwing rocks at police, or setting rubbish
bins alight, even throwing dirty diapers or rotting rubbish at anyone
they perceive to be desecrating the Shabbat.
But I never expected their anger would be directed at me.
I was mindful I would need to dress conservatively and keep out of
harm's way. But I made my mistake when I parked the car and started
walking towards the protest, not fully sure which street was which. By
the time I realised I'd come up the wrong street it was too late.
I suddenly found myself in the thick of the protest - in the midst of
hundreds of ultra-Orthodox Jews in their long coats and sable-fur hats.
They might be supremely religious, but their behavior - to me - was far
from charitable or benevolent.
As the protest became noisier and the crowd began yelling, I took my
recorder and microphone out of my bag to record the sound. Suddenly the
crowd turned on me, screaming in my face. Dozens of angry men began
spitting on me.
Spit like rain
I found myself herded against a brick wall as they kept on spitting - on
my face, my hair, my clothes, my arms.
It was like rain, coming at me from all directions - hitting my
recorder, my bag, my shoes, even my glasses.
Big gobs of spit landed on me like heavy raindrops. I could even smell
it as it fell on my face.
Somewhere behind me - I didn't see him - a man on a stairway either
kicked me in the head or knocked something heavy against me.
I wasn't even sure why the mob was angry with me. Was it because I was a
journalist? Or a woman? Because I wasn't Jewish in an Orthodox area? Was
I not dressed conservatively enough?
In fact, I was later told, it was because using a tape-recorder is
itself a desecration of the Shabbat even though I'm not Jewish and don't
observe the Sabbath.
It was lucky that I don't speak Yiddish. At least I was spared the
knowledge of whatever filth they were screaming at me.
As I tried to get away I found myself up against the line of riot police
blocking the crowd from going any further.
Israeli police in their flak jackets and helmets, with rifles and
shields, were yelling just as loudly back at the protesting crowd. I
found them something of a reassurance against the angry, spitting mob.
I was allowed through, away from the main protest, although there were
still Orthodox Jews on the other side, some of whom also yelled at me,
in English, to take my recorder away. Normally I should have stayed on
the sidelines to watch the protest develop.
But when you've suffered the humiliation and degradation of being spat
on so many times - and you're covered in other people's spit - it's not
easy to put it to the back of your mind and get on with the job. I left
down a side street and walked the long way back to the car, struggling
to hold back the tears. (End quote)
Read JUDAISM DISCOVERED by Michael Hoffman
Tuesday, 14 July 2009
The Longest Hatred
Monday, 13 July 2009
Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle Convicted
If anyone thinks I was 'over the top' in recently denouncing "7/7" and the whole "war on terror" conspiracy debacle, note that the government offers up a "counter-terrorism" expert.
I was never aware that holding politiocal opinions or debating history was tantamount to "terrorism."
Is the government, like the Masonic ADL, now saying that anything that questions Zionist power, Zionist war propaganda etc. is "terrorism?"
Have hundreds of years of English legal tradition been flushed away by a system subserviant to a form of political control-freakery responsible for needless wars, mass murder, enslavement to the banks, usury debt, mass unemployment etc.?
SHEPPARD GETS FOUR YEARS
They looked like a pair of cranks straight out of a Louis Theroux documentary.
One was an unrepentant woman hater whose racist and anti-Semitic views were too hard-line even for the British National Party.
The other, his long-haired sidekick, sought the protection of a pseudonym that he used to make extremist rants.
Their hunger to stir up controversy saw them flee from justice in the north of England and stage an unlikely claim for political asylum in Los Angeles.
But their journey has now ended with jail sentences in the UK.
Jurors at Leeds Crown Court decided neo-Nazis Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were not just harmless oddballs, but dangerous propagandists dedicated to whipping up racism.
On Friday, Sheppard was jailed for four years, 10 months and Whittle for two years, four months.
In a landmark case, they have become the first Britons to be convicted of inciting racial hatred online, having printed leaflets and controlled websites featuring racist material.
'Obnoxious and abhorrent'
The court heard the investigation into the pair began when a complaint about an anti-Semitic comic book called Tales of the Holohoax was made to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool, Lancashire.
It was traced back to a post office box in Hull registered to Sheppard, 51, a former BNP organiser kicked out of the far-right party after he was jailed in 2000 for distributing a racially inflammatory election leaflet.
The spotlight fell on the publishing activities of Sheppard, of Selby, North Yorkshire, a self-styled "scientific publisher", whose online ramblings took in a hatred of women and a morbid fixation with cannibalism.
But a police investigation discovered that his prime motivation was racism and he dedicated himself to producing what prosecutors called "obnoxious and abhorrent'' books, pamphlets and web pages.
 |  What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up  Mari Reid, CPS Counter Terrorism Division |
On his website, Sheppard employed Whittle, 42, of Preston, Lancashire, as a columnist under the pseudonym "Luke O'Farrell".
Although their vitriol was variously directed at black, Asian and other non-white people, most of the material shown to the jury was virulently anti-Semitic.
The language and racial slurs used by the pair cannot be repeated here, but some of the excerpts presented to the court offered a flavour of their discourse.
One leaflet claimed that Auschwitz had not really been the location of industrial mass murder but had been, instead, a holiday camp provided by a benevolent Nazi regime for Europe's Jewish population.
Jonathan Sandiford, prosecuting, told the jury that it held up survivors of the Holocaust to "ridicule and contempt", accusing them of lying about the genocide of six million Jews.
Another story was illustrated with photographs of dead Jews. Sheppard also wrote that Holocaust victim Anne Frank's diary was "evil".
Reviewing lawyer Mari Reid, of the Crown Prosecution Service's counter-terrorism division, said members of the public were entitled under the law to hold racist and extreme views.
But she added: "What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up."
Thrown out
The defence argued that the online material did not fall under the jurisdiction of UK law, because Sheppard's site was hosted on servers in California.
But in a landmark ruling, the judge dismissed this - potentially paving the way for further prosecutions against the owners of other hate sites who believe they are exploiting a legal loophole.
Jurors, too, rejected the defence's claim that the pair's writings were merely satirical.
Sheppard was found guilty of 11 offences and Whittle was found guilty of five offences in July 2008.
Sheppard was found guilty of a further five charges in January 2009.
But the pair were not in court to hear the verdicts against them.
Before the jury in the first trial could return verdicts, both men fled to Los Angeles International airport and attempted to claim political asylum.
But their bid was thrown out by an immigration judge, and they were held at Santa Ana prison in California until they were returned to the UK to serve their sentences.
The irony of two racists attempting to exploit the immigration and asylum system was lost on no-one who followed the case.
Internet Fraud: It's an Israeli Thing!
Israel keeps its dubious crown
By Guy Griml
haaretz.com
Israel has much to be proud of, but one dubious distinction it might prefer to do without is that the People of the Book have the highest proportion of hackers per Internet user in the world.
The United States sports the highest absolute number of denial of service attacks. But Israel boasts the most malicious mischief per surfer in the world.
In a recent report on Internet security threats around the world during the first half of 2007, virus buster Symantec claimed that 11 percent of the computers used by Israeli surfers are directly responsible for online attacks and other hacker mischief.
Second to Israel in proportion of hackers is Canada, followed by the U.S. At least some things change: In the last Symantec report, on the second half of 2006, Israel still placed first in hackers per user (with 9 percent), but the second and third places were held by Taiwan and Poland.
In 2004, Israel was in fifth place. It has come a long way.
Another type of malware, or malicious software, is "software robots," popularly known as bots.
These uncharming pieces of malware usually arrive via spam emails (you know the type - "Boy do I have a deal for you. Pink Viagra and it really works!") What the bots do is comb through your hard disk seeking out information about you. Sometimes, they also help the perpetrator steal your identity, not for the sake of playing games, but to clean you out. And that doesn't mean your kitchen cupboards.
Symantec says that China has the most bot-infected computers, but Israel is in third place, with 3 percent.
Don't blame Petah Tikva for that paltry showing. In the Symantec ranking of cities with the most bot-infected computers, Petah Tikva places second in the whole of the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa). That is quite an achievement, given that in the previous report, on the second half of 2006, Petah Tikva was in ninth place.
The city of Haifa can command respect, too: It is in tenth place in the EMEA, up from twelfth place in the previous half year.
Why do Petah Tikva and Haifa rank so high? Chiefly because these two cities host the headquarters of Internet service providers - Internet Gold in Petah Tikva and NetVision in Haifa.
A worrying aspect of the Symantec report is that cybercrime seems to be not only spreading, but becoming more professional. It is no longer a question of some sickly pale megagenius kid sitting in his parents' basement hacking into the Pentagon: The company found a rising number of cyber-criminals using advanced tools to perpetrate malicious attacks.
---
Finally, meet the Nigerian scammers!! They are Israelis...
July 5, 2009
The Tel Aviv police fraud squad arrested on Sunday nine Israelis on suspicion of netting millions of dollars from U.S. pensioners in a so-called Nigerian scam.
Sunday, 12 July 2009
Afghan War: Zionists Sent Our Troops to Die
Afghanistan is a needless, pointless war: as far as we in the UK are concerned.
For the powerful elites in Washington DC and Tel Aviv it's a different mater of course.
So we have to ask ourselves, why should our troops - including teenage boys - be put out as cannon fodder?
It is a Zionist war! We have no interests in it. End of.
When "9/11" happened and America started attacking Afghanistan, with the backing of a supine Westminster regime, some "patriots" immediately supported them.
On the back of the "911" lies they whipped up support for a 'war on Islam' because this was the path they were starting down, a road that would see them marching in step with Neo Cons, Zionists and other enemies of Britain and our interests.
At that time we went against the (perceived!) grain by putting out a colour leaflet (with the popular "US Govt. Under Zionist Control" sticker design on the bottom of it).
I don't have a copy to hand (but I do have one in a file somewhere in the depths...) but the leaflet made circa ten or a dozen key points against the Afghan War, points that could not be denied by any serious thinking nationalist.
It was as a result of this leaflet that the Kosher Patriots back-peddled and changed their story.
"Islamofascism" was still the number one threat (a lie not borne out by subsequent events, especially the global economic crash, caused by Zionist banksters in America -- clearly part of the main threat to our stability and well-being) but they were forced to admit that foreign wars were wrong and that no British lives should be put on the line.
Of course this new line made no sense, because if you really do believe that "Militant Islam" is the threat to world peace, then you would (still) support the war in Afghanistan because our troops are out there fighting Muslims, and Muslims that oppose the New World Order, Israel and the whole package.
I have condemned and exposed (yuch!) David Aaronovitch for his gung-ho approach to the War on Terror [sic], and even he is now trying to water-down his history in these matters (see recent post) but at least he still supports the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (though with tacked-on hypocritical caveats).
Those who back the Neo-Con verbage re. Clash of Civilisations and the War on Terror yet who found it "unpopular" to support the Zionist Wars and so back-tracked are even worse, because they do not even have the courage of their own convictions!
Those of us who saw through 911, who have always condemned militant Zionism as the threat to world peace, who have always pointed to he Zionist role in usury-banking as the threat to lives, homes, jobs etc., those of us who have condemned the ghost-outfit Al Qaeda as a CIA set-up etc. etc. have no such qualms.
Not one British, not one European (yes... not even one American!) life should be put on the line for illegal, Zionist wars.
It is as simple as that.
But in opposing British involvement in foreign wars, we must join-the-dots.
If we oppose Zionist Wars we must oppose the entire War on Terror.
To do otherwise is to excel in hypocrisy.
The family of each and every dead and maimed soldier deserve better than that.
I believe this video deals with the time when our own 'Mid East Envoy' was one Lord Levy! The man of the peerages for cash scandal: Lord Cashpoint himself.
Now ask yourself this: who runs the "free world" [sic]; who runs the banking system; who runs Hollywood; who runs the media.
Muslims?
Er.... no.
Friday, 10 July 2009
Journalists Who Argued for Illegal Wars Should Face Trial
There is hypocrisy and there is bare-faced cheek... then there is something more.
Right: Like all court historians and journalists Aaronovitch earns his shilling by attacking the enemies of his masters. As well as defending illegal Zionist wars across the Middle East -- yet not wishing to put himself on the front line! -- he also produced this tome, which wraps up real history with crank history, so any idea of "Zionist power" is as 'crazy,' in his works, as Dan Brown's gnostic theories.
The Jews have a word for it: chutzpah [drop the c and you've pretty much got the phonetic pronouncement].
Chutzpah is when someone kills your mum, makes you pay them for the coffin and then comes round every day to help you spend your inheritance on items which they then walk off with... only to sell back to you at a later date at an inflated price on HP which you can by then ill afford, only to repossess your house for your failure to keep up the HP payments. he'd probably then offer to rent your ex-home to you at twice the going rate.
Our politicians are quite good at chutzpah. So were the banks (sub-prime mortgages etc.). So are quite a few media talking-heads.
Imagine Tony Blair, invader of Iraq and co-author of the "War on Terror" stitch-up being made the Mid East's "peace envoy."
That's chutzpah.
OK, you can put your note books away now. Lesson's over.
Last night on the BBC's Politics Show I witnessed possibly one of the worst cases of chutzpah in recent months.
A journalist said that we do not want to be in Afghanistan, but now there we must see it through.
Nothing strange there as a few politicos (e.g. a Lib Dem -- who have been critical of recent wars -- on the BBC's Question Time said much the same last night).
However when you think of how said this particular statement (i.e. we should send in more troops though we may not like it) you realise how we are being spun yet another line by a bunch of apologists for mass murder who care not a jot how many body bags come back to be saluted by the population of Wootten Bassett as they pass through in yet another flag-draped funeral cortage.
You see the reporter in question was one David Aaronovitch.
"Who he?" you might ask.
Well, the reporter tends to work for The Independent, and when the whole "9/11" and "War on terror" mess was being rolled out to a credulous population, Mr. Aaronovitch was the key 'left-wing' cheerleader for the Zionist policy of war against Afghanistan, Iraq and anyone else that America-UK-Israel deemed a "threat."
When we were all smelling a rat with the Zionists' lies, half-truths and war propaganda, Mr. Aaronovitch was out there in media land banging the drum for Bush and Blair.
Many journalists, talking heads and "experts" (all of which labels could have been applied to Aaronovitch at the time) take the shilling off the spooks (MI6, CIA or Mossad) and are used in that respect. They are put about the TV studios to give the spin their paymasters want on any given situation.
if you have ever read any serious book on the spooks you will know journalists, professors and similar are often kept on the payroll for such situations.
After all - why risk any free-thinker or someone hostile to their agenda getting the limelight (though this happens of course) when you can at least try and balance up the odds more than a little by employing X number of "experts?"
Now I do not know Mr. Aaronovitch (I'll take that as a badge of honour!) but his gung-ho approach to the "War on Terror" and his backing of a seemingly "right-wing" Neo-Con series of adventures had all the hallmarks of being a service to his paymasters.
After all, he can't have won many fans in the left-wing, Independent-reading luvvie circles he would normally associate with.
As an aside we should always remember that it was to Mr. Aaronovitch that Mr. Griffin announced that his mission to "turn around" the BNP was going to be a stage-by-stage affair (he likened it to turning around a sea-going super-tanker, i.e. it would need a very wide arc and be a slow process).
Why would a left-wing ultra-Zionist give such an open forum to one of the supposed "fascist" opposition, with all its cosy talk of waiting at stations, popping in the butchers, genteel car rides et al? After all, there is no such thing as a free lunch (also enjoyed if I recall correctly).
But back to business.
Does the warmongering Zionist apologist for Cheney, Rummy and Bush really think we have such short-term memories? I may forget where I put my keys on an almost daily basis... but I tend to remember the low-lives who made all the excuses for a needless Zionist war in the UK media: and it would be hard to forget the central role undertaken by Mr. Aaronovitch.
There is bare-faced cheek and then there is chutzpah.
Mr. Aaronovitch knows what chutzpah is, and not just because he is a well-educated (I don't know where he went to school, but I'll bet it wasn't a local run-of-the-mill affair!) astute journalist.
I also do not know if Mr. Aaronovitch has ever lived in the illegal bandit-state that is the cause of so much of the Neo Con's (oxy-)moronic philosophy and warmongering, though the truth of the matter is of course that he has the "right" to "return" there (unlike all the Palestinians forced out via ethnic cleansing, state-sponsored terrorism and all the rest of it).
In stating that we may not want to be in Afghanistan, but must now get on with the job Mr. Aaronovitch is rubbing our nose in the Neo-Con fecal aftermath.
He did want us out there. He did make excuses for the warmongers. He did want our troops used as canon-fodder for a Zionist policy that would result in yet more terror (CIA-inspired or copycat).
If and when war crimes trials are held for Afghanistan and Iraq -- as they surely must if we live in a free and fair world (I know, stop laughing) -- just as they were for the Germans and Serbians amongst others, then I hope the role of bought-and-paid-for politicians and journalists will be at centre stage.
After all if the "I was only following orders" defence was of no use in the quasi-Soviet show trials of 1946, then they cannot be used to dodge the death penalty (aw... go on!) when Blair, Bush, Rummy, Aaronovitch and their ilk are in the dock.
Now... where did I put my keys.
Link:
Ex-Communist Aaronovitch Attacked AntiWar.Com
Aaronovitch Supported Iraq War and Israel's Gaza War Crimes
Thursday, 9 July 2009
9/11's 'War on Terror' Delivered the Police State
If anyone thinks the "War on Terror," "Al Qaeda," "9/11," "7/7" and all the rest of the awful Americanisms so bandied about by our willing media (BBC, Murdoch-owned and other) were just good v. bad, or simple aspects of a naturally occurring 'terrorism' they are fools at best, willing dupes or just plain evil opportunists at worst.
World Zionism, Global Freemasonry, the New World Order... call it what you will: it has organised, cajoled, used agent provocateurs, whipped up a scared, compliant or ambivalent media.
Think I'm wide of the mark?
Watch this week's Panorama (still on BBC i-player) and you will see how we have become a very real police state with all kinds of legal demonstrations and justifiable political campaigning all but labelled "terrorism" with the knee-jerk ill thought out "anti-terror" legislation, blindly accepted by our money-grubbing politicos, used to scare, frighten, silence and otherwise target legitimate campaigners.
Since when does the state have the right to take the picture/video and name/details of every single person on a legal demonstration (as I know from one National Front friend they did a couple of years back as NF members disembarked from a coach).
We live in a police state.
That is what 9/11 and all the rest of the nonsense was all about.
And as more body bags come out of Afghanistan as we, the new Soviets, fight the Mujahadeen 1.2 we are still told we are fighting for "democracy" and even "wymmins rights" in Afghanistan.
That must be why we invaded Burma, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... and all the other nations that use lethal force against their own people and neighbours in contravention of international law.
So please, fellow nationalist, open your eyes.
See beyond the media headlines. See through the "patriots" who serve the NWO agenda by trying to ally us with Israeli interests. See past the "War on terror" claptrap and the lies that our countrymen are dying in Afghanistan to "defend us" or "defend democracy."
We are being ushered into a police state. The "Al Qaeda" bogeyman has been used to silence those who protest against new labour, big business - and much more.
Anti-terror legislation was used to freeze Icelandic assets when the whole 'Credit Crunch' hit.
Now Panorama makes it clear that as well as the whole DNA database scandal and the government's attempt to keep a database on all our children, the police are now keeping all info on any innocent, law-abiding demonstrators for many years.
The Credit Crunch began when Zionist bankers and shysters in America started profiteering from poor communities by charging exorbitant rates of usury even beyond the "accepted norm."
The "War on Terror" started because our Zionist masters wanted "the West" to become far more active in the Mid East for Israeli interests, as well as enabling them to push through scandalous legislation such as the "Patriot Act" [sic] to spy, keep records, and silence more of us.
Quid Pro Quo, mon ami, Quid Pro Quo.
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
Saturday, 4 July 2009
Friday, 3 July 2009
Michael Jackson - the Canonised Saint of the New World Order
MICHAEL JACKSON:
WHITEFACE STAR OF THE ALCHEMICAL MINSTREL SHOW
by Michael Hoffman | June 26, 2009
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-jackson-whiteface-star-of.html
We pause in our round-the-clock defamation of Iran to bring you,
Michael Jackson.
Our Zionist-controlled media have temporarily shifted from hysterical
denunciation of Iran to pious genuflection before the altar of an androgyne.
To the extent that Iran has been demonized, Mr. Jackson is being
canonized -- as "the" iconic American entertainer. How strange and at
the same time, revelatory.
No white actor may wear blackface today, but Mr. Jackson--who
reputedly was once a Black man--wore permanent whiteface thanks
to modern surgery and chemicals. His visage was reportedly collapsing
faster than his finances. Where are the photos? Why the cover-up?
I don't lament the demise of blackface "entertainment" by white per-
formers, for, as William N. Grimstad documents in his classic work,
"Talk About Hate," the lowbrow shtick of vaudeville and movie "coon
song" blackface was a Judaic art-form perfected by Sophie Kalish
("Sophie Tucker" the "World-renowned coon-shouter"), Asa Yoelson
("Al Jolson"), Edward Israel Iskowitz ("Eddie Cantor") and Joe Yule
("Mickey Rooney"), promoted by moguls like Louis Lazar ("Louis B.
Mayer") and Max Aronson ("Bronco Billy Anderson"), and such early
Zionist movie studios as Selig Polyscope.
Jackson was a mirror image of this degraded process, only instead of
white greasepaint he resorted to permanent bleach. Was he a Black
impersonation of a White transvestite? Or was his alchemy an elaborate
fantasy-in-life--a desire to deceive himself into thinking he had actually
become a kind of public White aristocrat? In the midst of the idolatry
that has followed his death, no one seems to be asking these questions,
even as Jackson is portrayed as the focus of the adulation of Blacks the
world over. If that's the case, one can only conclude that most Blacks
wish they were White. Yet that conclusion seems dubious, to say the
least.
Jackson was the first race-change personality on the world stage.
Sad to say, he was sick physically, mentally and spiritually. From his
dalliances with young boys to his occult persona as "Captain Eo,"
he was the exoteric manifestation of the esoteric putrefaction exuded
by a rootless, soulless, deracinated and boastful capitalist System,
which demands that conservative nations like Iran follow its degenerate
example or face media-generated hate and if all else fails, Israeli bombs.
The same talking head moralists who saw little but wretched evil in the
Muslim Iranian government, adore Jackson as if he were the Second
Coming. It is even said that Mr. Jackson was "The voice of America."
Jackson as ambassador and voice of the USA? Perhaps in this 21st
century, but not in the preceding one; that distinction is still held by the
classically educated Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby, who sold more records
than Elvis and the Beatles combined, was a star of radio and movies,
winner of the Academy Award, and a culture-bearer, not a culture-
distorter.
Jackson is not fit to shine Crosby's golf clubs and I say that not because
Jackson was a once and future African-American hermaphrodite and
pederast in whiteface. Crosby promoted talented Black singers and
entertainers throughout his career, and rightly so. Satchmo and Nat
would have rushed Jackson to the nearest priest or shrink and pitied and
prayed for him along the way.
Today Jackson is the god of the Chamber-of-Commerce-dump-for-
cheap-labor-Chinese-junk, otherwise known as the USA. Jackson
symbolizes the "joys" of our "capitalist way of life:" the freedom to
scarf hormonally-enhanced chicken at KFC while watching your ten-
year-old daughter have her childhood stolen by Hannah Montana and
"Madonna."
Way out here in the boonies of north Idaho, where this writer makes
his home, it's not exactly Norman Rockwell country anymore. As Brer
Rabbitt said when asked if he knew of a place so far away there was
no trouble, "There ain't no place that far away." Idaho certainly has its
share of modern troubles. But many of the people of Idaho are com-
mitted nonetheless to reviving the America of old that God once shed
His grace upon, and the sudden reanimation of the Michael Jackson
circus strikes us as perverted and delusional.
If Jackson is the face of America, then America no longer exists, except
in places like Idaho and Montana--while New York and Hollywood
bear the same relation to America that Michael Jackson's collapsing nose
and bleached skin do to the proud Black men and women he insulted
with his mission of becoming the leopard that can change his spots and the
Ethiopian who can change his skin.
But let us not feel smug or superior. We live in a scientific era where
cloned meat and genetically-altered corn are fed to our children; where
"pro-life" Republicans massacre Muslim and Arab civilians; where the
worst ideas are touted as the best ideas; where heads is tails. In such
a Mixmaster milieu, why wouldn't Black be White, and male be a simulacra
of female, and Michael Jackson the king of American culture and the star
of the alchemical minstrel show that has become a religion for the masses?
Copyright©2009 RevisionistHistory.org
Hoffman is a former reporter for the Associated Press and the author of
"Judaism Discovered," a book banned by Amazon.com
Spinning the Jewishness of Bernie Madoff
Spinning the Jewishness of Bernie Madoff by Andrew Anderson http://www.theoccid June 29, 2009 In the weeks before Bernie Madoff’s sentencing to what amounts to a life sentence, the professional “spin doctors” at various Jewish advocacy organizations were doubtless working overtime. They know that his sentencing will be the top story in many media outlets around the world. Their goal is to distance Madoff and his crimes as far as possible from the public perception of Jewishness, and to distance Jews, in general, as far as possible from the current global economic collapse. David Harris, the Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, exhibited this type of concern last December 21 in a letter to the New York Times in which he chastised the Jewish-owned newspaper for publishing an article that made the following passing reference to Madoff’s Jewishness: He was thought of as a great philanthropist, a pillar of the community, the chairman of Nasdaq — all of that stuff,” said one hedge fund executive who knew him. There was a joke around that Bernie was actually the Jewish T-bill,” the executive went on, referring to the ultrasecure investment of treasury bills. “He was that safe.” Mr. Madoff had traveled far from his roots in eastern Queens, where as a young man he cobbled together a $5,000 grubstake from his earnings as a lifeguard and sprinkler installer to start the famed investment firm that eventually bore his name, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities. He had come to move easily in the clubby Jewish world that iterates between New York City and its suburbs and southern satellites like Palm Beach. Indeed, in the world of Jewish New York, where Mr. Madoff, 70, was raised and found success, he is largely still considered as a macher: a big-hearted big shot for whom philanthropy and family always intertwined with — and were equally as important as — finance. Harris’ letter to the Times took them to task for “a striking emphasis on [Madoff’s] being Jewish. It was not just once, or twice, but at least three times before the article continued inside. Why?” Harris and other Jewish public relations gurus would like to deny the relevance of Madoff’s Jewishness. Some of their tactics have been 1. to suggest that Madoff’s victims were primarily Jews, hence transforming a story about a Jewish perpetrator into a story about Jewish victims; 2. to argue that Jews are not any more likely to do the sorts of things Madoff did than anyone else; 3. to equate any suggestion that there is an inherent Jewish tendency toward financial misconduct with “anti-Semitism.” However, anyone even remotely familiar with the recent history of Wall Street criminality would readily acknowledge the futility of tactics 1 and 2 above. The names of Ivan Boesky, Dennis Levine, Michael Milken, Sandy Weill, Jack Grubman and Sam Israel should be sufficient to establish a history of corrupt behavior, while the more recent antics of Richard Fuld, Ace Greenberg,James Cayne, Roland Arnall, and Robert Rubin should be sufficient to establish a central Jewish presence in the current global economic collapse. The little-known career of Ameriquest sub-prime finagler extraordinaire andWiesenthal Center co-founder Roland Arnall alone provides a solid basis for establishing Jewish complicity. The level of complicity becomes even more apparent when one considers that Jews make up less than 3% of the generalU.S. populati If the facts will become known, it will be only tactic #3 above that will confront informed Gentiles — the charge of anti-Semitism. It is high time that Americaand the world find the courage to openly discuss the facts of Jewish nepotism and hyper-ethnocentrism Andrew Anderson is a retired businessman.
Wednesday, 1 July 2009
Uri Geller, Michael Jackson and the ADL
So let's understand this. Jackson had two Jewish children and a close Jewish friend.
And yet the Masonic-Zionist Jewish-racist Mossad-front, the ADL, still labelled him an "anti-Semite."
Is there no depths to which they won't plummet to garner donations?
---
sorry - no details of article origins...
As he tried to come to terms with the death of Michael Jackson, a distraught Uri Geller spoke to TJ today about the allegations of anti-Semitism that dogged his late friend.
The 50-year-old singer, who had two Jewish children - Paris and Prince with his ex-wife Debbie Rowe - fell foul of the community twice in his career, firstly in 1995 with the release of They Don't Care About Us, which included the line 'Jew me, sue me, everybody do me'.
The second occasion came in 2005 during a court case. An answerphone message Jackson had allegedly left in 2003 was played during proceedings in which the singer, referring to Jews, said: "They suck... they're like leeches... It's a conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose."
Describing the comments as "hateful", Abraham H Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League said: "It seems every time he has a problem in his life he blames it on Jews. It is sad that Jackson is infected with classically stereotypical ideas of Jews as all-powerful, money-grubbing and manipulative."
He also claimed Jackson had an "anti-Semitic streak".
However, Geller, said Michael regretted those words, noting that the singer even acted as best man, wearing a kippah, when the celebrity psycic renewed his wedding vows.
Recalling the allegations of anti-Semitism, Geller said: "I had rows with Michael Jackson about that, when I heard that, I tried to wash Michael Jackson out of my mind and I said it a few times to the press that I don't want anything to do with Michael Jackson when I heard that.
"Michael called me many times to make me believe that that was not what he meant, I believed him. I don't want to even go there now because he is no longer around and I have to respect the Michael Jackson that I knew."
He added: "I can tell you is that I am still in a state of shock, I'm saddened, I can't believe that Michael Jackson is gone. He was my best man when I renewed my wedding vows with Hannah. Rabbi Shmuley Boteach was there. I remember Michael wearing a kippah.
"It is just devastating to face the reality that he is dead. I hope that Michael Jacksonwill be remembered with dancing, for his lyrics, songs and his music.
"He will be remembered as the idol, the icon, the legend and the phenomenon that made Michael Jackson who he was".
BBC Attacks '7/7' Truth-Seekers
Last night the BBC (which we used to fondly call Blair's Bolshevik Corporation) ran a part of its series The Conspiracy Files (Series Two).
It dealt with what has annoyingly (and Americanly!?!?) been labeled "7/7" - aka the "Muslim Terror Bomb Attacks in London."
The programme dealt primarily with a video called "7/7 The Ripple Effect" which we've linked to on the next post so you can go see it yourself.
Interestingly The Ripple Effect Video (TRE) has as a main part of its thesis that BBC is used and abused by the security services to disseminate lies about 7/7 and the whole "War on Terror" debacle.
Lo and behold the BBC spends an hour attacking TRE and those who have loosely coalesced around it.
The BBC "discovered" the man behind it (who gave them that info? MI5?), a man who is now in jail in Ireland awaiting extradition.
Another "doubter/revisionist" was smeared because he wrote a piece "denying" the holohoax.
It all smells of the usual fayre dished up by the Neo-Cons, BBC, government and spooks.
They pull apart small parts of TRE whilst ignoring some key issues (not least the fact that 3 of the "suicide bombers" were reported as being shot by the spooks at Canary Wharf!!!).
Still the BBC in being forced to come to the aid of their political bosses have highlighted TRE and will have ensured that hundreds of thousands more look up the video online.
Any nationalist who thinks the spooks are not capable of setting up patsies and setting off their own explosives are at best naive.
Watch TRE (linked below) and watch the BBC's The Conspiracy Files (available on iplayer at the BBC website) and think for yourself.
The woman who seems to be the "victims' mouthpiece" who takes the official line thinks it dishonours the dead to ask questions.
This is a line that holohoax officials use.
It is a lie.
The dead are dead. If anything, asking questions and truth-seeking is to honour them because if there are lies being peddled about how and why they died that dishonours their memory!
If I was murdered and an innocent man jailed for the crime, whilst the guilty walked free I know I would want the facts looked into and the guilty found and dealt with.
We must be free to ask questions, however unpleasant, however unpalatable to the government's pet BBC.
Does the fact that the BBC knowingly and unknowingly employs criminals, paedophiles, drunkards, adulterers and those who uphold bizarre religious (or anti-religious) theories make all their news coverage untrue or unpalatable?
No.
yet we are told that TRE etc. is unpalatable because of its authors religious outlook and one of its supporter's revisionist views on history.
Thanks BBC.
You have merely confirmed that you are a government agency out to smear anything that really looks into the whys and wherefores of the NWO, just as you will not ask the questions about the banking crisis, or the Bilderbergers, who owns the media etc. etc.
It certainly makes the questions over the BBC's reporting of events in Iran fall into focus!
On the programme the BBC reporter bewails that (the "discredited") TRE is "damaging trust in the British government."
Oh boo hoo!
Friday, 26 June 2009
London, July 4th, NF Anti-Homosexual Demo
ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL DEMO, LONDON 4/7/09
Left: The Mayor of London -- bonkin' Boris -- joins the homosexual lobby. Circa 0.4% of the population may have homosexual tendencies, but that doesn't mean we should all be held hostage by a degenerate minority any more than we should let psychotic people run government. Can we expect any elected representatives to join the anti-homosexual demo or at least publicly support it? Or -- like Boris -- are they too interested in positive headlines?
Our Comrades in the National Front are organising a counter demo to London "Gay Pride" on Saturday the 4th of July.
We would urge all nationalists, patriots and folk of good will to join the NF demo against the degenerate forces backed by this sterile and foetid government/system.
In the past the homosexuals and their allies have tried to use heavy handed tactics against the nationalists whilst the forces of "law n order" look on (just as they ignore the obscene behaviour and dress of the militant faggots - despite the laws of the land).
As such it is vital that everyone, at least in the Greater London region, should support this NF demo and get along there to show London and the whole of England that plenty of people are opposed to the cancer that is the militant, anti-family, homosexual lobby.
Please spread the word and do your best to attend.
If you would like to attend please phone the NF organiser on:
07849 748605.
Bad/Funny Michael Jackson Jokes
Please feel free to add your Michael Jackson jokes.
here's a few to get you started:
It's a conspiracy that Michael Jackson died of a heart attack.
Apparently the truth is that he had a stroke at a children's hospital.
Michael Jackson's London dates have been cancelled.
Daniel aged 9, Robert aged 7, Carl Aged 6... etc.
In honour of Michael Jackson they are bringing out a range of bendy toy figures.
A spokesman for Touch-Up Toys said "It's now time for the kids to play with him!"
Sir Martin Gilbert: Court Historian Chosen to Whitewash Iraq War?
Martin Gilbert is what is known as a "court historian."
He is the state's preferred choice.
Left: Martin Gilbert's panoply (in every sense of the word!) of books have made him a lot of money and given him great prestige from a war-mongering and corrupt state. He is the chosen historian of all Zionist politicians. This is just one of his many books on the holocaust (what an unhealthy obsession!). All roads lead to Tel Aviv!
His history of Israel -- quelle surprise! -- is biased. His book 'The Holocaust' is meant to be a definitive tome. Meanwhile his Churchill history is in stark contrast to the ugly truth.
The knighted Gilbert is reaping his reward for years of service to a Zionist state.
Some point to the fact that unlike expelled Palestinians, who have been forced out of their homes and off their land, Gilbert has the "Right of Return" to 'Israel.'
Now he sits on the official British government Inquiry into the Iraq War.
What a bloody farce - by that I mean the inquiry, not the lies before, nor the execution of the war.
Blair and Bush may be hoping that a few hand-picked ninnies and marionettes will airbrush out the known lies...
I can only hope public clamour and a few good men in the right circles will ensure some degree (!) of truth comes out about the Zionist, butchering and false nature of the "intelligence" presented, the war itself and the slice-up of Iraq for the various vested interests.
Mr. Gilbert notwithstanding.
Time will tell.
Link:
Gilbert's Israeli Book
Gilbert's Falsification of History
Last Week's Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Thieves and Property
One for our politicians:
"Thieves respect property. They merely wish the property to become their property that they may more perfectly respect it."
G.K. Chesterton
The Man Who Was Thursday.
Wacko Jacko the Whitened-Black Kiddie Fiddler
There's a bloke down the road looking glum, wearing a white armband.
Right: Michael Jackson picking his nose.
Yes, apparently last night Michael Jackson died.
Many say he was a "troubled" soul. But here's a man who settled out of court for £Millions in a child abuse allegation.
If you are innocent you would always fight any such allegation to the end, vehemently fighting your corner.
To 'settle out of court' is to all but admit guilt. It's what big businesses do to avoid bigger fines and brain-deadening court costs.
Anyhoo, with all this I'm always reminded of Christ's words that He will 'come back like a thief in the night.'
In other words, none of us will know when we will be called to meet our maker, and for someone who tried to bleach his god-given skin and de-Africanise (zoiks!) his appearance, I'd wager St Peter will have a stern look on his face if Mr. Jackson tries to moon-walk his way through the pearly gates!
Mayhaps he is about to start the toughest sentence yet, and his innocent victims will have justice at last.
Christ also said 'Money is the root of all evil' and in Wacko Jacko's bizarre world He couldn't be more right.
Goodbye and good riddance to the most ridiculous figure on the world stage: an "anti-racist" who tried to preach to the rest of us as he thinned his nose and bleached his skin (not to mention his ridiculous Hollywood-lifestyle as he preached "save the planet" hokum to the rest of us!).
Surely Dante had a special circle of hell for hypocrites and child-abusers?
I know... the older I get, the more liberal my views!
New Whitelaw (Blood & Honour) Shirt
This is the brand new Whitelaw T-Shirt now available from the FC Online Shop.
We're also please to announce that the Skrewdriver Rising and Skrewdriver Strong Survive (Cards) T-Shirts are now back in stock too!
Pop by for a visit whilst stocks last as these are sure to sell out fast!
Link:
Whitelaw Shirt
Tuesday, 23 June 2009
More on the BBC's Iranian Fibs Plus U.S. Psyops
BBC in Public Deception
Link:
Doctored Rally Pics
Iran Falling To US PSYOPS?
By Paul Craig Roberts
22 June, 2009
Vdare.com
President Obama called on the Iranian government to allow protesters to control the streets in Tehran. Would Obama or any US president allow protesters to control the streets in Washington, D.C.?
There was more objective evidence that George W. Bush stole his two elections than there is at this time of election theft in Iran. But there was no orchestrated media campaign to discredit the US government.
On May 16, 2007, the London Daily Telegraph reported that Bush regime official John Bolton told the Telegraph that a US military attack on Iran would "be a ‘last option’ after economic sanctions and attempts to foment a popular revolution had failed."
We are now witnessing in Tehran US "attempts to foment a popular revolution" in the guise of another CIA-orchestrated "color revolution".
It is possible that splits among the mullahs themselves brought about by their rival ambitions will aid and abet what the Telegraph (May 27, 2007) reported were "CIA plans for a propaganda and disinformation campaign intended to destabilize, and eventually topple, the theocratic rule of the mullahs." It is certainly a fact that the secularized youth of Tehran have played into the CIA’s hands.
The Mousavi protests have set up Iran either for a US puppet government or for a military strike. The mullahs are in a lose-lose situation. Even if the mullahs hold together and suppress the protests, the legitimacy of the Iranian government in the eyes of the outside world has been damaged. Obama’s diplomatic approach is over before it started. The neocons and Israel have won.
The US intervention and the orchestrated disinformation pumped out by the western media are so transparent that it is impossible to believe than any informed person or government is taken in. One cannot avoid the conclusion that the West wants the 1978 Iranian Revolution overthrown and intends to use deception or violence to achieve that goal.
It has become increasingly difficult to believe that facts and truth motivate the western news media. For the record, I would like to point out a few of the most obvious oversights, to use a euphemism, in the Iran reporting.
According to a wide variety of news sources (for example, London Telegraph, Yahoo News, The Globe and Mail, Asbarez.com, Politico), "Before the polling closed Mr. Mousavi declared himself ‘definitely the winner’ based on ‘all indications from all over Iran.’ He alleged widespread voting irregularities without giving specifics and hinted he was ready to challenge the final results."
Other news sources, which might not have been aware that the polls were kept open several hours beyond normal closing time in order to accommodate the turnout, reported that Mousavi made his victory claim the minute polls closed.
Mousavi’s premature claim of victory before polling was over or votes counted is clearly a preemptive move, the purpose of which is to discredit any other outcome. There is no other reason to make such a claim.
In Iran’s system, election fraud has no purpose, because a small select group of ruling mullahs select the candidates who are put on the ballot. If they don’t like an aspiring candidate, they simply don’t put him on the ballot.
When the liberal reformer Khatami ran for president, he won with 70% of the vote and served from 1997-2005. If the mullahs didn’t defraud Khatami of his win, it seems unlikely they would defraud an establishment figure like Mousavi, who was foreign minister in the most conservative government, and is backed by another establishment figure, Rafsanjani.
As Mousavi was seen as Rafsanjani’s man, why is it "unbelievable" that Ahmadinejad defeated Mousavi by the same margin that he defeated Rafsanjani in the previous election?
Neoconservative Kenneth Timmerman let the cat out of the bag that there was an orchestrated "color revolution" in the works. Before the election, Timmerman wrote: "there’s talk of a ‘green revolution’ in Tehran." Why would protests be organized prior to a vote and announcement of the outcome? Organized protests waiting in the wings are not spontaneous responses to a stolen election.
Timmerman’s organization, Foundation for Democracy, is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for the explicit purpose of promoting democracy in Iran. According to Timmerman, NED money was funneled to "pro-Mousavi groups who have ties to non-governmental organizations outside Iran that the National Endowment for Democracy funds."
The US media has studiously ignored all of these highly suggestive facts. The media is not reporting or providing objective analysis. It is engaged in a propagandistic onslaught against the Iranian government.
We know that the US funds terrorist organizations inside Iran that are responsible for bombings and other violent acts. It is likely that these terrorist organizations are responsible for the burning buses and other acts of violence that have occurred during the demonstrations in Tehran.
A writer on pakalert.wordpress.com says that he was intrigued by the sudden appearance of tens of thousands of Twitter allegations that Ahmadinejad stole the Iranian election. He investigated, he says, and he reports that each of the new highly active accounts were created on Saturday, June 13th. "IranElection" is their most popular keyword. He narrowed the spammers to the most persistent: @StopAhmadi @IranRiggedElect @Change_For_Iran. He researched further and found that on June 14 the Jerusalem Post already had an article on the new Twitter.
He concludes that the new Twitter sites are propaganda operations.
One wonders why the youth of the world, who do not protest stolen elections elsewhere, are so obsessed with Iran.
The unexamined question is Mousavi and his motives. Why would Mousavi unleash demonstrations that are obviously being used by a hostile West to discredit the government of the Iranian Revolution that overthrew the US puppet government? Are these the actions of a "moderate"? Or are these the actions of a disgruntled man who kept his disaffection from his colleagues in order to gain the opportunity to discredit the regime with street protests? Is Mousavi being manipulated by organizations funded with US government money?
John Bolton laid out the US strategy. First we try to destabilize the regime. Failing that, we strike them militarily.
As this strategy unfolds, Iranians will pay in lost independence or in blood for the naiveness of its secularized youth and for the mistake the mullahs made in trusting Mousavi.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand.
Saturday, 20 June 2009
Iran: BBC Caught Out Teling Naughty Fibs
Meanwhile, on Page 94 the BBC admits its spin and lies were found out:
Link:
Ahmadinejad Rally Reported as Opposition Rally
Friday, 19 June 2009
Many Twitter Users are in Israel and America: Not Iran
News reaches our ears that much of the "Twitter" content -- so beloved of the BBC! -- coming from protesters and the opposition in Iran is actually coming from America and Israel.
No wonder the Yankee Zionist regime asked Twitter not to close down for work/upgrades.
Despite pre-election polls showing the "opposition" would lose the election, the BBC still insists on belittling the majority who support the Iranian government.
It's pet reporter and MI6 stooge, John Simpson, insists on calling mass demonstrations in favour of the government as "bussed in" to Central Tehran. No mention of who's backing the opposition (we've had Kissinger and a CFR nodding dog on Newnight).
Gordon Brown asks that Iran should show the election was fair.
Are our elections fair? Masonic mass media primes people on a clutch of Masonic parties.
When the dust settles no doubt we will hear who has been pulling the strings behind the people desperate for power in Iran, to the extent they will ignore an election result.
Then we might see that it wasn't just "Twitter" that had links to Israel and America.
It seems we have a glitch in our online FC shop.
Please bear with us as we try and fix this.
Our webmaster, once we pry him away from the cross-hairs in Tehran, will be trying to get to the bottom of this...
Wednesday, 17 June 2009
2.2 Million Unemployed, £1.3 Trillion to the banks: Masons have Wrecked the UK
Loans, guarantees etc. to the banks have meant the UK taxpayer is covering the banks for £1.3 trillion.
Today news is in that unemployment is at a 12 year high at 2.2 million.
Yet still our government refuse to "bail out" industries and firms facing short-term problems.
Still our government allows big business to employ immigrants at low wages, whilst indigenous people sit on the dole.
Still immigrants, asylum seekers etc. are housed, fed, educated, etc. etc. whilst services are cut to pay debts to the banks.
Now various chickens are coming home to roost as the government is forced to admit an overwhelming national debt, and cuts in services to pay the debts and its interest.
The state has borrowed (at interest!) from banks to 'bail out'..... the banks!
Read that again.
Has it sunk in yet? What a ridiculous situation!
Every single politician and party is subservient to the banking system and the Judeo-Masonic usury system.
None will dare to rock the boat, as the banking-usury system use a carrot and stick to deal with the politicos, appealing to the greed and to their love of position, power and their overinflated self-importance.
So there we go, dear reader.
You, me and the local lollipop lady are covering the usury-banksters for £1.3 trillion, we will suffer the cut-backs as the debt is paid back by us tax-payers, meanwhile some of the firms we work for go to the wall as a useless government looks on.
Britain 2009. You really couldn't make it up!
Link:
Unemployment at 12 Year High
UK economy shrinking
Politicians Decide Against Bank Regulation
P.S. We must demand to know which politicians are Masons, which have worked for banks (pre, during or post holding office) and which government ministers, opposition shadow ministers etc. belong to groups like the Bilderbergers, CFR and similar shadowy groups.
Monday, 15 June 2009
How We Can Teach Iran a Lesson or Two on Elections
What a rum state of affairs in Iran!
What are we, the oh-so advanced "democrats" in the West to make of all this?
That Iranians are free to vote? Yet the Zionists will say they can only vote for Islamicists under a controlled media; unlike us who can only vote for Zionists and Masons... under a controlled media.
That Iranians are free to demonstrate? Yet the Zionists will say they can only do so under the eye of a police machinery which has already killed one person; unlike us who live in a police state, increasingly cannot demonstrate, and - as with the G20 protests - even innocent bystanders are killed!
Of course all this is in the background of an Iran that wishes to have nuclear power... unlike us, who seek to have... erm... nuclear power.
But then Iran is in the pockets of anti-Israeli mad man, unlike us... who are... erm... in the pockets of pro-Israeli mad men.
of course, lest we forget, the illegal UN-resolution bustin' state with the only illegally held nukes in the Mid East (a state which refuses to sign non-proliferation treaties or allow in UN inspectors) already threatens to bomb peaceful power installations...
Think.
For yourself.
Meanwhile those who might rant and rave, especially the Zionists, of an "unfair election" we shouldn't have such short memories as to overlook the postal elections of our own recent history which a judge said would shame a Third World banana republic.
Nor indeed of the hanging and swinging chads that ushered in a Zionist marionette into the White House and which also resulted in rioting on the streets of America (to be followed by an election in which one Masonic Skull & Bones society member (aka "Bonesman") stood against a fellow Bonesman.
Ah!
Aren't we so high and mighty, we "democrats?"
Tuesday, 9 June 2009
BNP Documentary on Welsh BBC1 Tonight
For those in Wales, or with satellite TV (try channels on Sky around Channel 974 or thereabouts), there is a programme on tonight at 10.35 entitled Week In Week Out (a regional 'Panorama style programme) on the BNP, entitled 'Race For Europe' (or similar!??).
Monday, 8 June 2009
Euro Elections: UKIP and BNP advance
Just a quick few lines:
Congratulations to the BNP on their two MEPs.
Interesting to see UKIP beat Labour (as foretold by some and scoffed at by others!).
With Labour collapsing and the Tories not picking up extra votes... it makes politics a little more interesting in the short term at least.
Otherwise there is a clear call by a huge portion of the electorate for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty at least, if not EU membership!
UKIP beating the government drives this point home!
Sunday, 7 June 2009
Minor Party County Council Election Results 2009
As of this moment it seems:
BNP: Three County Council seats (with claim of up to 5 Euro seats).
English Democrats: Won Vote for Mayor of Doncaster. No news on County Council seats.
Greens: 12 County Council seats (now on 123 seats).
UKIP: Eight County Council seats (plus claim for Euro Election triumph and beat BNP/Greens at head-to-head votes)
Mebyon Kernow: No update on their site, but they seem to have won 3 seats.
Any news on Socialist or similar parties' candidates welcome in feedback section.
Here's the blurb from the "minor parties sites."
BNP:
The British National Party stands to take at least one European parliamentary seat and has a chance of taking another three, according to a detailed analysis of the local election results across the country.
The BNP’s statistical analysis department has taken all of the available local election results from each region, and combined them to generate an average BNP vote across each region. These figures then provide a basis upon which European parliamentary results can be estimated. (European parliamentary seats are apportioned according to a complicated highest averages system known as the d’Hondt method, which is dependent on the total number of votes a party receives and the number of seats already allocated to that party in the election.)
The analysis of the local election results on Thursday are subject to a number of important caveats as far as the BNP is concerned.
- Firstly, in many regions, elections took place in local authorities which were not traditional BNP territory. For example, the BNP fought seats in the South East which had never been contested before, while in the West Midlands, there were no elections in BNP strongholds such as Stoke. For this reason, the local authority election results will be skewed, but they are the only figures currently available upon which any estimates can be made.
- Secondly, party political choice at local level may not be representative of party choice at national level. There is a strong train of thought which suggests that turnout for the BNP at Euro level is lower than at local level. Conversely, there is an equally strong argument that people who have voted BNP at local level are likely to already feel strongly enough about politics to carry this allegiance through to Euro level. On the current figures, it is impossible to tell which of the two scenarios will play out. Either of them, in any event, do not affect the fact that the BNP has an excellent chance of taking at least one seat in the North West.
- Thirdly, the final Euro tally will be affected by the size of the turnout for the UKIP party. Talked up by the media, it is highly possible that large numbers of people who have voted Tory at local level would have given their Euro vote to UKIP. This will see a substantial UKIP vote, which may affect the ability of the BNP to take seats under the d’Hondt system, even if its vote increases as per the figures below.
With these important caveats in mind, here follows the average local election result for the BNP. The possibility of a win or loss is calculated upon the minimum percentages required for the BNP to place on that region’s list of elected MEPs.
- South West region: Average BNP vote: 6.8 percent. Result: No Euro BNP seat.
- South East region: Average BNP vote: 7.4 percent. Result: BNP vote just below the threshold, therefore no Euro BNP seat. (This result can be affected by the fact that the BNP only fought local elections in many areas which had either never seen a BNP candidate before, or which had no record of previous large BNP votes.)
- London region: Only one local election contested by BNP, vote was 17.5 percent. Impossible to make prediction, therefore must presume no Euro BNP seat.
- East of England (Eastern) region: Average BNP vote: 9.8 percent. Result: BNP vote just below the threshold, therefore no Euro BNP seat.
- East Midlands region: Average BNP vote: 14.3 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat.
- West Midlands region: Average BNP vote: 12.6 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat. (This result could be boosted by the fact that the best BNP-supporting areas in the West Midlands - Stoke, Sandwell, Dudley and others - did not have local elections on Thursday, meaning that large numbers of BNP voters are not reflected in this average figure.)
- Yorkshire & Humberside region: Average BNP vote: 10.3 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat. (This result could be boosted by the fact that the best BNP-supporting areas in Yorkshire - Leeds and others - did not have local elections on Thursday, meaning that large numbers of BNP votes are not reflected in this average figure.)
- North East region: Only two mayoral elections held, average BNP percentage in those two contests was 6 percent. Impossible to calculate on those figures, therefore no Euro BNP seat.
- North West region: Average BNP vote: 13.1 percent. Result: One BNP Euro seat, and possibly two.
It therefore seems likely that that BNP will take at least one European parliamentary seat in the elections. If the local results hold true on the Euro level, it could be more.
In either event, the BNP has now established itself as a national presence, and has become firmly embedded throughout the country as a household name. Membership has increased dramatically during the campaign, and the party is now better placed than ever before to carry on the struggle for the survival of our nation.
English Democrats:
3:15 TODAY: Doncaster elect the country's first English Democrats mayor.
Labour and Tory candidates eliminated after first round.
Davies wins after second round count.
Peter Davies 25,344 - Mick Maye 24,990
The Doncaster free press reported that:
As a true Englishman, Davies celebrated his victory with a pint of foaming nut-brown ale....
In yesterday's county elections the Green Party continued to make steady progress.
The party made its breakthrough onto four county councils - Cambridgeshire (1 seat), Devon (1), Gloucestershire (1) and Suffolk (2).
In Norfolk the Greens held 2 seats and gained 5.
In Lancashire the party successfully defended 1 seat and gained a second. Lancaster Greens also held a city council seat in a by-election, and continue to hold 12 seats on the city council.
Unfortunately the Greens had effectively lost 4 seats before the campaign began, due to council reorganisation and boundary changes (in Eastern and North East regions). The only unexpected loss was 3 out of the 5 Green Party seats on Oxfordshire County Council.
Greens gain most at Labour and LibDem expense
The Green Party ended the campaign with 123 councillors on 42 councils, up from 119 on 41.
Of the Green Party's gains, 7 were from Labour, 2 from the LibDems and 1 from the Conservatives. This too continues a familiar pattern.
The party's steady progress in the 2009 elections was reflected in recruitment, with an 8.5% growth in membership during the six weeks of the campaign.
Greens look forward to the general election
The single most encouraging result was in Norfolk, where the Greens won more votes than any other party not only in the Norwich South parliamentary constituency, but also throughout the Norwich City Council area. This bodes well for the target constituency of Norwich South, which will be contested by Adrian Ramsay, the Green Party's deputy leader and currently leader of the opposition on Norwich City Council.
And in Lancashire, in the Lancaster and Fleetwood target constituency the Greens outpolled everyone except the Conservatives.
UKIP:
UKIP have triumphed in the local elections taking a total of EIGHT seats on Staffordshire, Nottinghamshire, Norfolk and Suffolk county councils and Newcastle-Under-Lyme district council.
The Party has picked up four council seats on Staffordshire County Council as Labour were decimated, losing 29 of their 32 councillors.
In Nottinghamshire, Labour again got a pasting losing 22 of their 35 seats and UKIP were among the beneficiaries as Rev Tom Irvine won Hucknall. And in Norfolk, Rex Parkinson-Hare took the Yarmouth Nelson and Southdown ward with 779 votes, beating Labour on 702 and the Conservatives on 551. Again, Labour was crushed, losing 19 of their 22 seats on the council.
On Suffolk County Council, UKIP's Bill Mountford will take up his seat on behalf of the residents of Lowewstoft South.
Meanwhile, in the by-election for Newcastle-Under-Lyne, UKIP's David Woolley is the new representative for Wolstanton.
A handful of results from the 594 seats contested by UKIP are still to come in but 57 of the party's candidates, so far, won more than 25% of their seat's total vote. Overall, UKIP took a total of around 350,000 votes at the council elections.
In the 480 seats where both UKIP and Labour contested elections, UKIP took more than 80,000 votes than Labour. And the party also beat the BNP and the Green Party in the majority of seats where they were head-to-head.
The average UKIP vote share in seats where a party candidate stood was almost 16%.
Link:
Clash of Civilisations: 2000 Years of Anti-Christian Hatred
I just began reading a book entitled The Stripping of the Altars by Cambridge Professor Eamon Duffy after reading his more recent book on the reign of Mary Tudor (both published by Yale University Press).
Right: Prof Duffy's book on the grass roots faith of the people of England.
The book deals with the grass roots religion of the English people from circa 1400 to 1580, written to show that the changes imposed under Henry VIII, but primarily under the reign of Edward VI, were not universally embraced, moreover they were piecemeal and grudgingly enforced, and so easily reverted under the reign of Mary Tudor (e.g. removed Rood screens secretly stored and simply replaced).
That gives you some background anyway.
In the preface to the second edition Duffy answers some of his critics in relation to the mater of the Lollards in the early 15th Century. He answers that the Lollards had little effect on the population as a whole. In fact, the Lollards are an interesting pointer to how sometimes the path to hell is paved with good intentions, because some who justly called for a return to charitable acts and godly priests became twisted enough to attack the sacraments of the Church.
Some of their fellow early Lollards even turned on them and attacked them for this. It kind of makes you think of the Reformation itself, with many people fed up of genuine corruption in the Church, but the assault on Churches, the pulling down of statues etc. speaks of a far more suspect motive.
As such Duffy discusses those in the 15th Century who were attacking the very idea of the sacraments, especially of Christ's body, blood, soul and divinity being present in the Eucharist.
He writes of a Mid-15th Century play called the Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which he thinks was written in Suffolk. Here he tries to show how short-lived and shallow was 'Lollardy' because by this time the play, which could have been used to sucker-punch the Lollards and "contemporary heresy" makes no mention of them at all.
As Duffy himself says:
"The anti-sacramentalists of the play are Jews."
And that, I think, is the nub of the reality.
It was well to question corruption in the church - as many did and do. This finally resulted in the Counter Reformation (and if you get the chance, for a startling account of the theological and political nature of it and its ramifications for Europe, read The Counter Reformation 1550 - 1600 by B.J. Kidd published by SPCK, the London-based Anglican in-house publisher).
The force which always pushed against the Church as it existed and the sacraments were, surprise surprise, the Jews.
Little surprise there as the Crucifixion of Christ was the act of their religious leaders 2000 years ago, and as any genuine Christian or Jew will say the Church and Christians of the 15th Century believed with its heart and soul that the Sacramental nature of the Mass, the central pillar of daily and weekly life for most folk, was a re-enactment of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion.
In short there were Altars in every Church in every city, town and village because you need an Altar for a Sacrifice; and the vast majority of English (and European) people believed in the Sacrificial nature of the Mass.
Those opposed to this were the Jews, who rejected Christ and His Church.
This is the lesson for all history.
Who publishes the movies that blaspheme and mock our Christian heritage? Who runs the banks that enslave our people, business and government in illegal anti-Christian usury? Who bankrolled and organised Communism that ushered dozens upon dozens of millions of Christians to their deaths in gulags and via enforced starvation? Who are disproportionally present in so many "Western" governments - governments that betray our people, enslave us, destroy ancient freedoms and bring in multi-culti anti-religion?
Who promoted Luther and his works to attack the Church, only to reject even his watered-down Christianity (much to his chagrin after all their help and anti-Papal diatribes he thought he would convert them all) and so cause him to retaliate by writing 'The Jews and their Lies?'
What of the Jewish printing presses in places such as Amsterdam which published tracts attacking the Inquisition in Spain?
This was the Church's attempt to overturn heresy in its own ranks (note: nobody outside the Church could be brought in front of it) by "conversos" - Jews who claimed to have converted to Christianity yet continued a form of "Crypto-Judiac" religion. And yet the Jewish printing preses churned out material purporting to attack the Church for some kind of "genocide" of Jews.
Indeed, so many people (for the right and wrong reasons!) point to the Spanish Inquisition as the forerunner to the Shoa/Holohoax; and the roll of a controlled media in both events cannot be overstated.
As one nationalist wrote in his article on 'the Sacred Nature of the Six Million' the attempt in more recent decades has been to remove the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as the centre of world history, the point in time that all peoples looked to, with the "sacrifice" of the "six million" in WW2.
Some folks think when the Jews rejected Christ they were looking for a new militaristic messiah that would bring their world empire (er... New World Order), with the Jews as the "chosen people" at the head of it.
Others think that the Jewish people, or their religious/political leaders, now consider themselves to be a kind of messiah (a form of Race worship), with a duty to control the world, bring "enlightenment" to the world (hence the role of Freemasonry etc.) and throw off the shackles of Christian "superstition."
Right: A satire on the French Revolution, yet in The Terror of the Masonic French Revolution, there was a real Talmudic bloodlust to murder all those who adhered to Christianity and Tradition. The hatred of Christianity saw a naked whore enthroned in a Cathedral as the goddess Reason, and the Eiffel Tower constructed on consecrated Hosts, to show the Masonic "victory" over Christ.
They founded Freemasonry as a "gentile Judaism" to bring about revolutions and amoral politrickery, and even Freemasons have admitted that their religion is Talmudic and Luciferian.
They founded Communism to bring about a revolution against Christianity and to establish their Utopian vision (of gulags and repression). Communists and Jews have admitted that Communism was Jewish.
They even founded Islam some 1400 years ago as a means to stop Christianity spreading eastwards to their new lands in the Khazaria region, to provide a buffer-zone.
Anyhoo, the issue here is that whether we look at Palestine at the time of Christ, 7th Century Arabia, Mid 15th Century England, 17th Century Spain, 18th Century France, 20th Century Russia, 21st Century America or so many other times and nations, the "Clash of Civilisations" is clear.
It has been a fight ongoing for 2000 years.
If we value our Christian heritage then we have to know our history, we have to know who our enemy is, and why they hate us and Christianity.
Unless we know all this, any resistance, any fight for national Independence is meaningless, because our historical enemy will merely take it and pervert it to their own ends.
If Nationalism becomes Zionist then it has lost before it has even got anywhere.
