London 2012 Olympics: Beanfest for Multi-National Big Businesses

They get billions of tax pounds

The Olympics is coming to town.

The global elite and big business mafias are running the show. They have special traffic lanes so not to mix with us plebs. They grab the best seats whilst idiots seeking the bread and circus excitement scrabble for tickets. They tell us what we can wear and eat in their Olympic zone.

Meanwhile small businesses, such as bakers and newsagents, are prevented from mentioning the Olympics - even those excited by it and seeking to promote it -for fear of feeling the mailed fist in the velvet glove that the multi-national tax-dodging overlords will bring down on their heads.

Then we come to the "Power of Nightmares." The elites put missiles around London, even on residential buildings. Yet the people they chose to run the 'secutity' couldn't run a "knees up" in a brewery. So in the end we have the government paying soldiers to do what the government already paid G4S to do. It has a pale reflection of the banking crisis about it: multi-nationals fail and the tax-payer is on hand to bail them out!

And on that score why is it the government can find billions of our tax-money to put on a bean-fest for the mega-rich and the elites (with their useful idiots cheering on), whilst throwing people on the dole? The Masonic crew that run the State always find billions to help out their fellow mega-rich, Masonic, internationalist mates.

If you're a nurse in a state/council run nursing home, cleaning up crap for a living on little more than the minimum wage, then you live in fear of cuts. But if you are the boss of a multi-national, tax-dodging, multi-billion pound bank or Olympic-sponsoring big business (with no real loyalty to Britain) then the state will always find billions to help you out!

The cleaners who tidy up the offices of top politicians recently asked for a living wage. They are not alone. People are struggling to pay utility bills, food bills, mortgages... MPs aren't struggling. Nor are the top bankers, QCs, police chiefs and the rest of people who run the show and keep us in our place.

It's time the political class sided with the people and bailed us out, instead of constantly siding with internationalist big businesses who often syphon funds through offshore accounts and who demand cheap wage-slaves come in from the Third World to undercut the wages of the indigenous few.

They could start by outlawing usury (especially "pay day loan" sharks) - including the parasites who rob the poor and bankroll the political parties with the millions they make. All (productive) loans should be capped at a fixed amount. e.g. 5% above the base interest rate. So, you borrow £10, you pay back a fixed amount of circa £10.50. There's a guaranteed profit in that - but no exorbitant rate to wreck businesses and families.

Imagine mortgages fixed in such a way (not to mention Gaddafi style interest-free loans or gifts from the State of farm land etc.) -- it would revolutionise the country, free people from debt and allow them to spend more. It would help us feel much better off. But as it would knock the multi-billion pound profits of the internationalist bankers and rather put multi-billions back into the real economy, don't expect it to happen.

This government, this State, all the political parties, the media, the police, the judiciary and the lawyers -- all are in the pockets of a usury system dependent on heavy taxation. They will not free us from usury or heavy taxation, because they all get crumbs from the table of the Masters of the Universe, and they all meet in their temples, they all have a revolving-door employment policy and so on.

So go cheer the Olympics, which your tax pound has paid for. Just like the circuses of ancient Rome it may take your mind off the corruption and crime for some weeks.

But when the big black limos and armour-plated cars have left the Olympic traffic lanes, we will still be mired in debt, taxation, crime and slavery.

As the songmeister once intoned: Freedom? What Freedom?

Stabbings in London's West End

Consumerism, multi-culturalism, gang culture?

Oxford Street Boxing Day crowds - Whites are a minority

What was behind the stabbings and murder in London's West End which started when "two groups of youths" (media/police code for West Indians, usually) argued in the trainer shop Foot Locker?

A fight over the latest fashion of training shoes? An argument over "respect?" Or a post code gang fight?

What's for sure is that the norms of society are falling apart and our politicians are powerless to stop this kind of nonsense. More liberal, 60s failed dogma wll not solve this mess.

Consumerism, multi-culturalism, gang culture -- all have to go if we are to stop more violence and nihilism, whether it's Summer riots or Boxing Day stabbings.

Who the hell goes shopping with a concealed weapon? It's time to end the chaos.

Link:
Oxford Street Stabbings

Police Arrest Woman for Croydon Bus "Racist" Rant

On the BBC London News tonight, there was a story of an English woman on a bus in Croydon ranting against immigrants/non-whites.

Of course we are not shown the provocation, but were told by the police that this was unacceptable, that the woman would be found and arrested. Indeed at the end of the report they gloated that a 34-year-old lady had indeed been arrested.

Now few people will find her language acceptable in front of children, nor are her arguments particularly succinct and thought-through, but I repeat: what was the provocation?

Being a regular user of public transport in the Capital I can state as a fact that most foul language and aggressive behaviour against fellow passengers does not come from, let's say 'English' people (wouldn't want to break any laws!). "Gangsta" of every type (even in school uniforms!) regularly sprawl across the gangways, throw things at passengers, use foul language with impunity and so on.

Such is the boring monotony of travel in the capital, which working people usually put up with, for fear of the occasional but well publicised stabbings that take place.

How lucky we are that the police have the resources to track down, arrest and hold a lady for such crimes against humanity as ranting against immigrants. Luckily for Londoners (especially the real ones, the English ones) there are no muggings, knife crimes, gun crimes etc. to worry about and they can finally walk the streets in absolute safety now that a young mum at the end of her tether is under lock and key!

Lucky for her they have done away with capital punishment.

"Racist Woman"

Video of her rant (please beware it does contain a lot of bad language):

How the Media Works: "No You Did Not See Blacks Rioting" - Kay Burley on Sky News

Watch this video. Approx 3:25 into it a shop owner says he saw blacks rioting...

Kay Burley steps in. She was not there, but she tells the articulate young man what he actually saw.

Zoiks! Welcome to white guilt land.



Also look out for Ms Burley equate herself with working mums on council estates... ;-) Come on Kay - tell us the name of your au pair/nanny. Tell us what your annual income is!

The sisterhood act is a bit implausible when played out by those who live in their white enclaves, in their million pound homes, whose idea of multi-culti is employing a Filipino au pair and choosing which restaurant to go to.

In closing, Ms Burley did not suffer brick bats and Twitteratti abuse for telling this young man what he actually saw and re-writing the story. I bet David Starkey is so very happy the media is even handed!

David Starkey on Newsnight Quotes Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood

On Twitter, on Radio 5 Live, the historian David Starkey is being pulled apart as a "bigot", "racist" and "ignorant" for stating that the riots have a racial character and that the white chavs are essentially "whiggers" -- i.e. have taken on black gangsta culture.

He has dared to say what so many screaming liberals have wanted covered up, that the gangsta culture, born in U.S. ghettos, with its gangsta rap and its baggy-arsed trousers and weirdly angled baseball hats, has been embraced by some white trash/chavs, and it is they who joined the gangstas in rioting: so it is a racial event, albeit gangstas and whiggers, whilst decent whites and blacks who still have the culture of their grandparents (hard-working, Christian etc.) look on appalled.

As we and others have said, the more generations removed from the Empire Windrush and all that, the worse things get because multi-culti destroys roots, heritage, cultures, decency, honesty, duty etc. and the results of the "melting pot" is to churn out gangstas with no respect for any authority, any culture, any history/heritage etc.

As David Starkey said "the chavs have become black" who speak patois, and strut about like gangstas (a typical example is the "white" bastard who stole from the Malaysian student's backpack, whilst his coloured accomplice distracted him, that the whole world saw - to England's shame.

Will they now jail David Starkey, the outspoken homosexual historian, for daring to touch on some uncomfortable home truths? No doubt the "usual suspects" will call for him to get a longer sentence than the gangsta looters!

What was it Orwell said about the truth being revolutionary? Did we ever live in such Orwellian times?

Meanwhile the Neo Con mouthpiece David Aaronovitch boasts of the need for more CCTV, because these people do not want the gangsta menace wiped out -- they want to molly coddle them, and use their endemic criminality to get more Police State powers (whilst they live in the safety of their rich enclaves).

Aaronovitch also says the gangstas are no different from the Mods and Rockers on the beach at Brighton, or Skins and Punks in the late 70s.

I think those of us who saw homes and businesses burnt down see a vast difference! These Neo Cons and liberals also know that all the white youth groups (mods, rockers, skinheads, whatever) were never pumping areas full of guns and drugs.

The Neo Con right and the liberal/Marxist left are deliberately putting up a smoke screen. They will paint it as non-racial, when we know where and how it started. They will paint it as poverty when those people wear trainers and carry phones more expensive than anything I have.


The gangstas have made the streets of London unsafe for decades. The police know this. They know who are carrying the knives and the guns. But to talk about the elephant in the room - as David Starkey has - is to face the screaming hordes.

The reverse of this media whitewash (excuse the pun!) is that Sikhs and Muslims who defended their homes and businesses (as is their right) in Southall and Dalston, whilst tooled up with knives and swords, are proclaimed as heroes by the media, politicians etc.

Yet the White English who took to their streets in Enfield and Eltham are dismissed and attacked as "right wing extremists" even though they carried no weapons to defend their own communities.

This is how the media works. Lap it up.

White Youths Fight Back: Eltham and Enfield

This pic shows what are alleged to be Millwall fans, joined by Charlton and Crystal Palace supporters if some reports are to be believed, patrolling Eltham.

Sky News just interviewed Whites patrolling Enfield to protect their area from looters too.

The police have betrayed the white communities/enclaves of London, whilst they back-off from black rioters and protect the areas where the politicians and bankers live/work.

Community Action, not petty party point scoring. This is what is needed, and the only thing that can save London.

Why is Nick Griffin Lying over London Riots?

BNP in Enfield in July: Civic Nationalism

Just as with the Norway shootings, Nick Griffin is covering up his Neo Con lies re. the London riots in tweets he wrote:

We also now see exposed the weakness of the civic nationalism of the EDL & the 'immigration is only a . . .
. . . question of space and eastern European workers line of Ukip. To both groups, black immigration . . .
. . . is great. Tell that to all the Londoners living in fear or exile.

Those of us who have followed the ideological backflips of the BNP will recognise these things as hallmarks of the BNP itself.

In recent years the BNP said:

• It was 'space not race'
• Britain is full up (i.e. its OK now, but no more).
• Black Britons could be patriots.
• Muslims were the problem, not blacks.
• Poles were a greater threat to us than the coloureds already here.

And so on. They took a specifically "civic nationalist" (i.e. non-racial) and Neo Con stance on these matters as so many posts on this blog going back years will testify. We reported with horror how the BNP was targeting fellow Europeans (often the only white faces on the local bus!) whilst cuddling coloureds (even the other week NG could be seen gathering signatures against the EU in Enfield from coloureds and similar). And, of course, all we ever got apart from the 'Poles issue' (to try and out perform UKIP) was the mantra "Muslims, Muslims, Muslims."

Nick Griffin in Enfield in July - more "space not race" eh?

Even when these riots started, NG gloated that this was nothing - just wait till the Muslims start. He finds those Neo Con tendencies so hard to give up -- it is no consolation to our people living in fear that 'the Muslims might be worse' -- whether in fact that is true, or not!

In a typical backflip he now pretends that he has been a racial nationalist all these years (just as after Norway he pretended he was against Zionist extremism).

Please Mr Griffin do not lie to us any more. We have years of this spin and BS. We cannot trust you, because we do not know who you are or what you believe (or will say tomorrow!)

Interestingly, the BNP appealed for donations last night using the riots as an excuse! Seems like no event is too much for them to try and get money in to pay their debts! They should instead give their inflated MEP wages to help White victims of these race riots, instead of trying to fill their own coffers.

I also came to know him as somebody who was potentially very changeable, who could flit seamlessly from believing in one idea to another.
Ex-NF activist Phil Andrews

Update: later on twitter Nick Griffin congratulated Turkish people for defending their properties. So that's Nick Griffin congratulating MUSLIMS for standing up to his BLACK BRITONS. What chutzpah!

Riots in London - Time to Discuss Repatriation

There have been more riots today in many more predominantly white areas (not).

The government goes on about keeping our people safe when it embarks on useless Neo Con wars, yet it has proved it does not give a fig for local people, their property, homes and businesses as it leaves rioting filth to smash and burn huge areas of London.

"It's OK, we have CCTV we'll catch them later," say the police chiefs. Oh great. Let them into Downing Street then, let them burn that down if it's OK to 'catch them later'. What twaddle. Laws are being broken in broad daylight in front of tooled-up coppers and the animals are allowed to carry on as they see fit.

I can't help being a little glad, though sorry for the people burned out, because the endemic lawlessness of gun/knife/drugs gangs that the politicians sweep under the carpet is now open for everyone to see. And no, Neo Con BNPers, it ain't the "muzzies."

This is coloured immigration at fault. Third and fourth generation Afro-Caribbeans are being joined by the 57-Variety of ethnicities (inc a tiny smattering of degenerate whites) to bring disorder out into the open.

Multi-culti mass immigration has failed and now its time for the politicians to (to use street slang) "fess up" as lawlessness spreads across London and into other conurbations.

Oh the excuses will flow. Some MPs and "community leaders" are already on about 'the cuts' or the lack of jobs. But do they think life is easy in Glasgow, Merthyr Tydfil or Newcastle? Do they think jobs are plentiful, money is pouring in and homes are readily available in those areas? Yet they don't riot. They don't rob shops for trainers and mobiles. Why?

Ali G - "Is it cos I is black?"

Multi-culti has failed. The elephant in the room for decades has been gun crime in inner city London. We are on the road to the indigenous become the minority in London and England. Is this the future they face? Living behind bars? Fearing mugging and being shot in the 'good times'? Then facing riots and fires when it gets really bad?

Immigration has not "enriched" us, it has been one long bloody disaster. Money has been poured into it to try and make it work, but it has destroyed indigenous communities where people knew each other, crime was minimal, guns and drugs were pretty much unheard of, people left their doors open etc. etc.

It sounds like a cliché I know - but it's a truism.

Mostly white areas aren't perfect, human nature being human nature, and no place is ever going to be a utopia. But when people in Shropshire, Durham, Lothian, Devon, Dyfed, Northumberland, and other regions look at London they know that something is very, very wrong.

Immigration has failed. We can judge it by its fruits.

For the future of our grandchildren, for the future of areas as yet unaffected, and for the future of decent Londoners - we need to think the previously unthinkable for many, and decide just how and when we are going to remedy a generation of immigrant offspring that obeys no laws, respects no authority and will harm or kill anyone that stands in their way.


Let us be brave enough to discuss the R word.

Repatriation. Surely now, the time has come.

It can be humane. It can be phased. It can be financially assisted. It can be associated with overseas aid grants.

The liberal experiment has failed. The bosses may have got some cheap labour. The upper classes may have got cheap au pairs. But we, the working class indigenous people of these isles have been betrayed and seen the communities we grew up in wrecked beyond recognition.

Using savings in housing benefit, unemployment and other social costs we could fund a huge, ongoing campaign of resettlement that will give coloured families an escape from "institutional racism" that they seem to think is everywhere, and financial aid will mean they can buy homes, set up businesses etc. in their ancestral homelands.

Phased, humane, financially assisted resettlement of Afro-Caribbeans, together with a block on further immigration from outside Europe and help for Asians and others who want to "go home" would bring the harmony so longed after by Englishmen and women in London and elsewhere.

Repatriation really is an idea whose time has come.

• It's not about hate, it's about survival. 
• It's not about revenge, it's about harmony.
• It's not about harming some, it's about helping all.
• It's not about racism, it's about facing reality.

The chaos in London cannot be allowed to get worse, and no Mr. Politician, we do not want to live under a Police State either. Just find humane solutions that end immigration and the failed multi-cult experiment, and let the English and other indigenous peoples of these isles live in peace once again.

That is supposed to be your number one concern. At the moment it sure as hell doesn't feel like it.

Nick Griffin Downplays Riots by Going on About Muslims

I can't believe Nick said what we told him to!

In a tweet earlier the Neo Con mouthpiece, Nick Griffin said these riots were "nothing" compared to if the Muslims kicked off.

Right.

That must be a great comfort to the small businesses closed down by these rioting animals in Tottenham, Enfield and elsewhere.

Is Griffin suggesting that the Oldham riots were worse than Brixton? Birmingham? Manchester? Bristol? Liverpool? - all 1981. Not to mention Tottenham in 1985 when PC Keith Blakelock was murdered?

Honestly Mr. Griffin - your fixation with the Muslims stinks of Israeli policy, undermines possible indigenous opposition to integration, and is severly p'ing off genuine nationalists and patriots.

Whoever is paying you to spout this Neo Con B.S., 30 pieces of silver is not enough.

The Wonderful Gifts of Immigration - Part 94: Tottenham

BBC reports of rioting, police cars and a bus set on fire in the predominantly black area of Tottenham, North London.

No, EDL/BNP fools, this doesn't seem to be Muslim.

This is yet another wonderful example of the BNP/EDL's "Black Britons" showing the difference between the generation of the Jarrow Marchers and the ne'erdowell dole bum and drug/gun gangs that infest our streets.

Two points:

1. We are not fans of a police state, but the idea of "da community" throwing petrol bombs when their areas are infested with gun crime (which stops genuine folks going out at night etc.), shows how criminality is rampant in these areas.
2. Trouble has been rumbling on for days according to a local black reporter and resident on BBC News 24 tonight, so why have the media covered this up? Did they hope it would die out and so their multi-culti nightmare be protected - once again?

Oh and how the media will portray this as "institutional racism" -- not a result of black drugs gangs and their love of firearms, nor a failure of mass coloured immigration, whereby millions of non-Europeans have been allowed to settle in England, with little or now acceptance of our norms of behaviour.

Nationalists take note: this ain't "the muzzies," this is yet another clear example of the mistake that was mass coloured immigration and failed multi-culturalism.

Time to start resettling Africans and Asians. Those law-abiding coloureds must see that for themselves as multi-culti, integration et al have failed to root out criminality, drugs, guns etc. in places like inner city London, which sees their own sons either dragged into criminal drugs/gun gangs, or the victims of them.

For the benefit of all races - we must seperate and repatriate.

London's Burning: Agent Provocateurs on the Streets

Right: Caption suggestions:

1. Sarge, sarge? Is this the right way to do it?
2. Mum - Can I drop my washing off next week?
3. Argghhh! Keep that magnet away from me!
4. Ok ya. So back to uni for Pimms?
   

The riots in London at the "anti-cuts" rally bring forward a number of interesting aspects for nationalists:

• The state is behind much of the fracas. This is well documented, and the blog GriffinWatch has brought together some of the evidence.
• This is in response to the previous police state tactic of kettling, leading to perfectly law-abiding people having to urinate in the street and not being allowed to go about their perfectly lawful business (even people not in the demonstrations!). The police are out to prove that if not allowed harsh tactics, trouble ensues.
• The state-led violence is used to silence and arrest genuine protesters.
• Meanwhile the media go out of their way to disassociate the socialists etc. from the violence. Nationalists remember how left-wing (state led?) violence against NF marches in the 70s was used by the same media to paint nationalists as 'violent.'

The secret state and the media (the same media that paints US/NATO action against the Libyan army in support of a rebel army as a "no fly zone") have been playing out the game, and we sheep just baa.

Re. the London riots one is reminded of GK Chesterton's book "The Man Who Was Thursday." Seems like nothing has changed in the seedy world of the anarchists!

A Very Middle Class Revolution

The sight of students and lefty-anarchists rioting in London has been accompanied by many stories of the middle and upper class students enjoying the riots.

I find myself torn in two directions.

I cannot overlook the injustice of burdening young people with debt (usury is usury), especially when (as so many people are now forgetting thanks to a compliant media) the bankers caused all this upheaval.

Lest we forget, "our" government bailed out the banksters to the tune of multi-billions of pounds (essentially tax-payers' money as we will repay the usury-debt on the loans) and now it is taking money from the young, the needy and even emergency services (today they announced the closure of coast guard stations).

meanwhile a report from the City of London the other night showed a busy shopping "mall," bustling with City workers busy spending their inflated wages and bonuses.

So whichever way we look at this, as nationalists, we have to say the same old Zionist usury-bankster con is rolling on, and we the battered tax-payers (of today and tomorrow) will pay the bill for the greedy profiteers with no national loyalty, those with "...dead alien eyes" to quote the great patriotic Englishman GK Chesterton or as the sublime Welsh nationalist Saunders Lewis wrote, with their "Hebrew snouts" in ledgers.

Yet at the same time we are seeing the usual "rent-a-mob" circus with flea-bitten anarcho-Marxian causes dusted off and leftist banners raised over the multi-culti, middle class throngs.

The system is creaking and people are disgusted with bankers, politicians etc. and the safety-valve of the soap dodgers is released. Thus we see the middle and upper class idle rich-kids proclaiming anarchist and/or socialist revolution (notably when they and their ilk are threatened with bills - they didn't riot when workers were thrown on the dole).

I recall as a youth in a working class area, the anger when the middle class students came into town to plaster their SWP posters and stickers everywhere, telling us that our City was a "nazi free zone" only to bugger off back to mummy and daddy's suburban des res at the end of the academic year (before going on to work in banking).

I used to (used to?) get irate that the middle classes could descend on the city I grew up in and tell us what to think, go on about "the workers" when they were bank-rolled by mummy and daddy, meanwhile we - from the families of workers they claimed to speak for - were sick to death of mass immigration.

So I find myself in the position of a classic liberal: I defend the right of the students to protest, because I see the injustice of a system that taxes people to bail out multi-billion earning banksters; yet I loathe the sight of the same rent-a-mob, middle class banksters-of-tomorrow claiming to defend "workers' rights."

As ever, we need a third position, a movement of the people, not merely speaking out for the vested interests of the few, but denouncing the usury-banking-Westminster system in defence of the entire nation.

Here endeth the rant. ;-)

BBC Attacks '7/7' Truth-Seekers

Last night the BBC (which we used to fondly call Blair's Bolshevik Corporation) ran a part of its series The Conspiracy Files (Series Two).

It dealt with what has annoyingly (and Americanly!?!?) been labeled "7/7" - aka the "Muslim Terror Bomb Attacks in London."

The programme dealt primarily with a video called "7/7 The Ripple Effect" which we've linked to on the next post so you can go see it yourself.

Interestingly The Ripple Effect Video (TRE) has as a main part of its thesis that BBC is used and abused by the security services to disseminate lies about 7/7 and the whole "War on Terror" debacle.

Lo and behold the BBC spends an hour attacking TRE and those who have loosely coalesced around it.

The BBC "discovered" the man behind it (who gave them that info? MI5?), a man who is now in jail in Ireland awaiting extradition.

Another "doubter/revisionist" was smeared because he wrote a piece "denying" the holohoax.

It all smells of the usual fayre dished up by the Neo-Cons, BBC, government and spooks.

They pull apart small parts of TRE whilst ignoring some key issues (not least the fact that 3 of the "suicide bombers" were reported as being shot by the spooks at Canary Wharf!!!).

Still the BBC in being forced to come to the aid of their political bosses have highlighted TRE and will have ensured that hundreds of thousands more look up the video online.

Any nationalist who thinks the spooks are not capable of setting up patsies and setting off their own explosives are at best naive.

Watch TRE (linked below) and watch the BBC's The Conspiracy Files (available on iplayer at the BBC website) and think for yourself.

The woman who seems to be the "victims' mouthpiece" who takes the official line thinks it dishonours the dead to ask questions.

This is a line that holohoax officials use.

It is a lie.

The dead are dead. If anything, asking questions and truth-seeking is to honour them because if there are lies being peddled about how and why they died that dishonours their memory!

If I was murdered and an innocent man jailed for the crime, whilst the guilty walked free I know I would want the facts looked into and the guilty found and dealt with.

We must be free to ask questions, however unpleasant, however unpalatable to the government's pet BBC.

Does the fact that the BBC knowingly and unknowingly employs criminals, paedophiles, drunkards, adulterers and those who uphold bizarre religious (or anti-religious) theories make all their news coverage untrue or unpalatable?

No.

yet we are told that TRE etc. is unpalatable because of its authors religious outlook and one of its supporter's revisionist views on history.

Thanks BBC.

You have merely confirmed that you are a government agency out to smear anything that really looks into the whys and wherefores of the NWO, just as you will not ask the questions about the banking crisis, or the Bilderbergers, who owns the media etc. etc.

It certainly makes the questions over the BBC's reporting of events in Iran fall into focus!

On the programme the BBC reporter bewails that (the "discredited") TRE is "damaging trust in the British government."

Oh boo hoo!

7/7 - Ripple Effect Video

Terrorists in London Reinforce Diversity

Yes - coloured gents bring genuine terror to the streets of London.

Will the coloured chappie responsible be charged with knowingly fulfilling stereotypes in a public place?

Oh what a day for diversity!

What joy for everyone involved in the fight against discrimination!

Londoners will feel relieved and safe on their streets at night, once again.

There's not a day goes past when we all can't be grateful for the gift of millions of non-Europeans brought here against our will -- and the many gifts they bring our society!

Link:
Stabbings at O2 "Urban" Awards
First Violence at O2 Arena

Choice quote:
"In 2004, a woman was shot outside the Urban Music Awards when it was held at the Barbican Centre in the City of London. "

Harrington Backs Coloured Candidate that Beats the BNP

Why should Harrington's "NLP" back a coloured black independent candidate in Dagenham - who then goes on to beat the BNP candidate?

Right: This gent isn't the candidate in question, but is he picking the substance that the NLP took in order to back a non-European in a Dagenham by-election?

The article below is written, we believe, by an ex-BNP official who is seeking to expose the creeping liberalisation of the BNP as well as the out-and-out cronyism of the "most Zionist" party.

FC readers will remember that the BNP leader backed the leader of Third Way/NLP, one Patrick Harrington, over his own BNP officials and activists in the Solidarity debacle.

It's interesting to know that this backing is paid back in kind by supporting a non-White candidate standing against the BNP!

Has the BNP leadership annoyed another (ex) ally?

With friends like these...


Link:
Black independent candidate gets Harrington's backing

London's Gay Boris - It's a Freemasonic System Stoopid!

Politics gets ever more homogenised as the years tick by.

Right: parliament was always a club for the monied classes. Whereas the votes and MPs used to be bought and sold via bribery and Rotten Boroughs, they are now bought and sold via media coercion and party hierarchies.

We live under a dictatorship. It is a Judeo-Masonic dictatorship with the misnomer "democracy."

Democracy was recognised as a dictatorship by Freemasonry decades ago by Leon Degrelle and his contemporaries.

Our people were shoved off the land by the greedy and powerful as they sought to enclose more land and become more wealthy.

As they died early in slums or turned to alcohol for escapism, the ruling class ruled via Rotten Boroughs and the Party System.

Since then little has changed.

The Party System has maintained the status quo, lurching to the left here, moving to the right there.

Up to the 1980s there was at least some semblance of "choice" - albeit heavily controlled, mostly through the mass media which was always under the control of handful of mega-rich media barons almost all of them Zionists and Freemasons to a man.

And so we reach today.

We are now at a time when the Party System and media control is almost total. The public has been so corralled into certain ways of thinking, that it is almost unthinkable for the system to allow any of its pet parties, for example, to oppose the "right" of Israel to exist, to oppose the "rights" of homosexuals, to oppose race-mixing and multi-culturalism, or to oppose the large scale murder of innocents that is abortion.

We can all think of examples where the political parties have become craven cowards in these regards.

• Failure to act against inner city crime.
• Failure to act against Israel's murderous and illegal invasion[s] of Lebanon.
• Failure to curb the vested interests of "advisory services" who profit from abortions.

Yet few are as craven as the way all the parties have bent the knee to the militant homosexual lobby.

• Which party will dare to call for the law outlawing homosexuality to be re-introduced?
• Which party will dare to state that adoption by homosexuals runs contrary to all accepted norms and undermines true families?
• Which party will dare to expose "civil partnerships" as a travesty and stepping to stone to full "homosexual marriage?"
• Which party will dare to say that homosexual activity in our public parks and toilets needs to be stamped out?

Even the anti-establishment parties are so imbued with the ideals of "human rights" and "democracy" that their opposition to homosexuality is muted, as is their opposition to Israel, abortion, Capitalism etc. etc.

Left: The campaigning "Gay Boris" is nothing new. What politician will ever make a stand against this pc madness? Will any put what is right before what is acceptable?

So don't be surprised when you see yet another politician taking part in some "Gay Rights" gathering. It's what they do!

It's as natural to them as ordering Ireland to vote twice on the same matter is to the Eurocrats.

Nothing is allowed to stand in the way of the New World Order!

Now that's democracy for you!


Link:
Tories Send Greetings to "Gay Pride" Event
Lefties State "Gay Boris" is a Hypocrite

Ray Lewis Deputy Mayor of London in trouble?

Interesting to hear that the black deputy mayor of London - chosen to target youth crime/problems (are they hinting that most trouble in London is from black youths?) - was embroiled in financial skulduggery back in the 90s when he walked away with tens of thousands of pounds lent to him by a parishioner.

Above Right: Boris Johnson (left!) and Ray Lewis. A new mayor - yet the talk of financial shenanigans continues.

This may be old news dredged up by a Labour Party still reeling from big inroads by the Tories, but it's embarrassing nonetheless.

Ray Lewis is still on the CofE's "Lambeth List" which means he cannot work for the Anglican Church in any public role.

At a time when events in Zimbabwe are making headlines, when the role of Nigerian gangs in financial (and internet) scams is well known, and especially in the shadow of horrendous social problems in London because of immigrant/coloured youths that are out of control, the fact that this coloured deputy mayor is in trouble is incredible.

Labour had their own shenanigans involving coloureds and money, especially with huge volumes supposed to be going to coloured businesses being pocketed by (coloured) Labour Party cronies.

Now the Tories are being seen in the same light.

When will these people ever learn?

London Assembly No Gravy Train?

With the BNP getting their first seat on the (Greater) London Assembly (GLA) there are a number of interesting issues.

A foreign comrade suggested that the BNP saw this as a 'pot of gold' to the tune of £100,000 pa. However according to the following link from the Voice of Change's Matt Single the £100,000 has to be closely accounted for. Furthermore the BNP aren't allowed to bring their own staff into the assembly. So "doing a Conway" albeit with toadies and cronies won't be an option.

Another site (NW Nationalists) is pooh-poohing talk of the BNP breaking the 100 councilors mark. It says many of the new councilors were unopposed parish councilors (think of the 'Vicar of Dibley') .

The BBC picked up on the point that the BNP has still not caught up with its highlight of voting percentages in 2004, with the lower rates of 2007 being replicated in 2008. This in spite of the attempt to become uber-Zionists and Israel-Firsters, plus promoting the support the BNP gets from coloureds, Sikhs and the rest of our multi-cult citizens - patriotic "Brits" to a man no doubt.

There are a couple of interesting posts. The first is Matt Singles, see the first link below. The second is 'Mr Potters' reply to a post on the NW Nationalist site, see the second link below.

With Richard Barnbrook already in the media for his sexual indiscretions, as well as his status as the face of the BNP in London, one wonders how long before the episodes in Burnley, Birmingham, the Black Country, Leeds etc. are repeated.

Plus ca change...


Links:

Voice of Change London Article
NW Nationalists BNP Article

BNP Courts Zionists. BNP is Zionist.

The BNP says it is not Zionist.

In the same piece it says: "We support the right of Israel to exist and defend itself against the relentless terrorist attacks"

The Zionist Board of Deputies says: "The BNP website is now one of the most Zionist on the web - it goes further than any of the mainstream parties in its support of Israel."

The BNP is Zionist.

Above Right: Hillary knows. You want any political power - you have to appease the Zionist lobby. Has the BNP been bought and sold? It is certainly trying very hard!


http://www.bnp.org.uk/?p=1769
BNP web site - 23rd April 2008

The BNP and Anti-Semitism:

A Response to the Board of Deputies

By News Team

The Board of Deputies of British Jews - working with the London Jewish Forum and Community Security Trust - has launched a misguided campaign, with the slogan, ³Your Voice or Theirs². Board of Deputies president Henry Grunwald told the Jerusalem Post: ³The higher the turnout across the country, the harder it [will be] for the BNP to succeed.² Every vote for a mainstream political party isŠ a vote against extremism,² Grunwald added.

Is Grunwald right? Should the Jewish community vote as a bloc to deny the BNP representation? Are they a monolithic community or one which contains different opinions within it? Pat Richardson is a councillor and a member of the British National Party (BNP). She told the Guardian recently: ³I¹m in the BNP because no one else speaks out against the Islamification of our country,² Support for Israel

We support the right of Israel to exist and defend itself against the relentless terrorist attacks of Islamic fanatics. This seems to be what led Ruth Smeed, of the Board of Deputies, to tell the press that: ³The BNP website is now one of the most Zionist on the web - it goes further than any of the mainstream parties in its support of Israel.²


Natural allies


The BNP has made its position clear many times. We are not ŒZionists¹, our overall concern is to look after the interests of our own country, and not to bother ourselves with or interfere in the affairs of other nations. But we have repeatedly denounced the neo-Nazi cranks who infest the fringes of British politics, and we reject anti-Semitism as part of a dangerous and outdated cycle of last-century hostility between Jews and Gentiles - a hostility that can only benefit our mutual enemy, Islamic imperialism.

Loyal British Jews are our natural allies in the fight against the Islamic fundamentalists who want to destroy the Western civilisation so many of whose core values we hold in common. That is just one reason why many Jews will be voting for the BNP. Let¹s remember also, however, that this is only one reason. Jews will be voting British National Party for other reasons too: because they are concerned about crime, because they are worried about the economic decline of our country, because they are concerned about the disintegration of community spirit and decent values. In other words for the same reasons as so many other British voters, including many Sikhs and Christian West Indians. As Martin Wingfield commented in our paper Freedom recently:- ³today there are an increasing number of Jews campaigning for the BNP and feeling very comfortable with their political choice.²

When the Chief Rabbi a few years ago wrote a book entitled ³Will Our Grandchildren Be Jewish?² he articulated precisely the same concern that we have for the future of our people in the same overcrowded multi-cult nightmare that threatens traditional Jewish and British identities alike. Just because a Jew wants to preserve and celebrate his ancestral culture and identity doesn¹t make him a Œhater¹ of Gentiles, and nor does our wanting to preserve and celebrate our ancestral culture and identity make us Œhaters¹ of Jews, or any other ethnic group for that matter.


Anyone but the BNP?


Jews are also rejecting the call to vote against the BNP for other reasons. They are being asked to vote for Establishment parties. Few believe they have any solutions. Many know that the tide is slowly turning against them. ²It is important that olim [immigrants to Israel] vote, because any vote is one to keep the BNP out. It doesn¹t matter who you vote for, so long as it isn¹t for the BNP, and that will help keep the BNP out of the London assembly,² said Jenni Woolf, National campaigns fieldworker for the Union of Jewish Students (UJS).

It doesn¹t matter who you vote for? Really? Jews are asked by some of their self-appointed Œleaders¹ to identify themselves with a political class that is increasingly despised and distrusted purely to deny the British National Party - and our growing number of voters - representation. This seems cynical, immoral and unwise to many.


A Jewish Green or Socialist? Bad Luck!


In addition to advocating a pro-Establishment vote the Board of Deputies campaign is bad news for Jewish Greens, Jewish Socialists and Jewish Independents. The campaign is based on boosting voter turnout to lower the percentage the BNP is likely to achieve. Presuming this worked (and we don¹t think it will) it would also have the effect of denying Greens, Socialists and Independents representation. Does anyone really want a London where political diversity is shut out? Would the election of two or three BNP members to the GLA, a Green and a Socialist be such a bad thing? Wouldn¹t a BNP voice act as a check or balance on some of the crazier ideas?


The ŒRed Ken¹ problem


In London there is a particular problem - ŒRed Ken¹. One Jewish BNP supporter puts it like this:-

Q. Who Compared a Jewish journalist to a Nazi guard?

* Portrayed young British Jews as potential soldiers in the Israeli army, thus raising the accusation of ³dual loyalty² (it is well-known that only Israeli citizens can serve in their country¹s army)?

* Edited a newspaper which ran a cartoon showing then-Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin dressed in an SS Uniform and captioned with the words ³The Final Solution² in Nazi-style Gothic script?

* Embraced Sheikh Yusuf al Qaradawi, a leading ideologue of Islamist terror and an avowed anti-Semite?

A. Not the BNP but Ken Livingstone.

Many in the Jewish community are aware that anti-Semitism is widespread on the Labour Œleft¹. Often it is cloaked by a terminology which is anti-American or anti-Zionist but the motive is clear. Why then do the Board of Deputies and CST single out the British National Party for attack on the basis of arguments and positions we left behind in the last century, while saying nothing about the current radical Islamist agenda of ŒRed¹ Ken¹s core Muslim constituency? Are they as out-of-touch with their community and its interests as our own political Œleadership¹?

We wouldn¹t be surprised, which is why we urge all concerned to ignore the self-serving and backward-looking bias of those (neo-Nazi cranks and professional Zionists alike) who would foster suspicions between the British National Party and the grass-roots Jewish community in order to maintain their own power-bases, rather than facing up to the realities of the Era of Global Jihad: We hang together, or we hang separately.