Swansea White Pride Rally? Really?

Swansea Marxists have got their knickers in a twist over a mere internet rumour...

They published this piece of nonsense about people converging on Swansea from all across the world for a White Pride march.

Gullible?

Either they are too stupid to ignore internet gossip, or they found it useful to get more students to wave lolly pop placards against the "evil narzees"

One 'good point well made' in the report was put over by one brave soul saying that no-one would bat an eye for a Black Pride rally (probably lots held by the Marxists...) yet White Pride becomes the work of the devil???

Thanks to the faculty member who sent this into us in disgust.

Socialism: Industrialised-Death, State-Control, Gay-Rights.

This sums up Socialism: social control, mind-numbing work, death-centred society, family undermined...

Labour, Tories or Lib Dems: they all follow this agenda whilst they argue over the level of obscene debt they have is in hock to the banksters, and whether we should be taxed to the eye-balls or the eye-brows.

The death of civilisation.

Socialist Workers Party "Anti Nazi" Losers & Rapists

Who remembers this piece of SWP nonsense?

Happy days.

On Twitter now the SWP are trying to silence lefties debating accusations of rape by members of the SWP hierarchy.

Get your lollipops ready:

SHUT DOWN THE COMMIE RAPISTS

No Comrades? Oh well...

Organised Atheism = War, Gulags and Torture

Atheists like to blame "organised religion" for wars when most wars have been political or even between families(or the same dynasty) for power.

Think of the Norman invaders of England who then fought endless wars with the French over land and rights in France. Both armies were Christian, but religion had nothing to do with a squabble over French lands.

Of course most wars were between standing armies. When massacres of civilians happened they tended to be the exception to the rule.

What the 20th Century proved is that when God is taken out of the equation, the blood-lust of men worsens. Unconstrained by a moral code, atheists murdered more people in the 20th Century than religions have ever been accused of! Morality in the wars fought by atheists (often fought against Christians - even in their own lands - or nations with an outward allegiance to Christianity, if not factual) was the exception to the rule.

Atheism has brought genocide and the gulag, with little hope of clemency or forgiveness. When Christian nations fought each other there was always the hope of truce, of clemency, of sanctuary, of common decency in treating prisoners and suchlike.

Of course Christians through history have not always been perfect (men being men) but take off the supposed "shackles" of Christianity and with no moral code (bar the empty human rights and equality slogans of the commissars which quickly fade) then men quickly descend to depravity, mass murder and torture (from the Ukraine to Cambodia, from Spain to China).

So the next time some Red idiot waffles on about "religious wars" ask him about the millions murdered by organised atheism, as opposed to soldiers killed in historic dynastic squabbles .

Irish Patriots Against Communism

A 1930's poster issued by the Irish Blue Shirts who sent volunteers to fight on the Nationalist side in the Spanish Civil War.

Brighton: Reds Throw Bottles at Families on St George Parade

This message was sent to us by a supporter:


Dear Friends,

Today I was proud to attend the St George's Day March For England in Brighton. The fact that it was a non-political Patriotic parade, didn't stop hordes of unwashed UAF/SWP/Anarchist dregs throwing bottles at us. I saw one of our marchers hit in the face by a bottle. There were young children on the parade as well. The Far-Left failed to stop us and we flew the Cross of St George high!

News report: 

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-17786261

Atheism is all About Love and Respect. Right?

One for all the brain dead atheist militants out there.

Atheism has killed more in the last 300-odd years than religion has ever been accused of.

In the 20th Century alone atheist reds killed circa 100 million people.

And yet recent governments have been crammed full of atheists and "ex" Communists.

Nice.

Posh Students Want to Boss Working Class Lancastrians

Man Met Anti-Fascist Students Unveil New Slogan

....Nazi menace... blah blah... fascist activity... blah blah...

We hope this meeting is open to all, in the true spirit of democracy.

Isn't it funny how Communists, Anarchists and those who would herd us all into gulags become "trade unionists" and "radicals" whenever they fear the rise of street activism by patriots.

It's high time that middle class students (prior to going to work in banking) kept out of local politics, and let local Lancastrians get on with demonstrating against the failed policy of mass coloured immigration.
 
===

Help Push Back The Northwest Fascists -

Emergency Meeting Next Tues, 13th March, 7pm At Man Met Uni Students'

Union, Oxford Rd

The recent spike in fascist activity in the north-west is worrying. At

least one Asian-owned business in Rochdale was attacked by a mob of

100, instigated by North West Infidels (23/2). Six hundred EDL

supporters rallied in Hyde (25/2). Some EDL fascists displayed a

banner from the roof of Bury Town Hall (3/3). Towards the end of 2011,

EDL thugs attacked the offices of Unite the union, and a radical

bookshop in Liverpool.

We want to mobilise wider forces to drive back the Nazi menace: trade

unions, students, community groups, faith groups.  Where we've done

this, we've had success, blocking the EDL's national turn-out in Tower

Hamlets (3/9) and destroying the BNP's beachheads of Nazi councillors

in Stoke and in east London in the 2010 elections.

Come to the meeting, affiliate your union or organisation to Unite

Against Fascism and help stop the Nazi threat.

Turkish Nationalists Target Antifa in Germany

As if Antifa anarchist middle class warriors getting beaten up by Kurdish mobsters wasn't funny enough, now we have what the media term "Turkish neo-nazis" targeting Antifa. Oh the delicious irony.




In truth, historically the "grey wolves" were a kind of Masonic "far right," like the Italian groups set-up or taken over in 70s Italy (the Third Position refused and so was targeted by P2 for suppression - part of which was the infamous Bologna bomb plot).

The hero of the Turk nationalists - Ataturk - was a Donme; a Asiatic Jewish "convert" to Islam. Like the Jewish "converts" to Catholicism that tried to undermine Spain from within (thus bringing about the Inquisition -- which no one expected [my little joke]), so the Donme "converts" created a Masonic Turkey with the cover of Islam (hence historically it has tended to support America and Israel).

But I must admit it is funny (funny weird, not funny ha ha) to see Turks flying Turkish flags in Germany and talking about imperialism or colonialism. They should know!

Belgian Reds get Accosted by Muslims

In this video we see Muslims go up against Communists, in Brussels.

Cor blimey guvnor it's like Afghanistan 1980 all over again.

What was it the militant lefty Mensi once sang about the Hammer and Sickle being fickle?

And is that a poof banner behind the Muslims? It's all getting a bit panto mate! "They're behind you!"

I always wonder why Communists back 'queer rights' when faggotry was always a disease of the idle rich - mind you so was Marxism.

I've answered me own question! Apples and pears!

Muslims Give Antifa Anarchists a Beating in Sweden

Before the usual brain-dead trolls start up, this are not our videos and their editorial content is not ours.

Got that? Has it sunk in? Good. Then we can get on...

These vids show the Antifa getting a beating from the very immigrants they claimed to want an open door policy for.

You see, Mr Antifa, whatever banners you wave, you are still white men. And when that mugger holds a knife to your throat as your girlfriend is raped, all the bleating about multi-culturalism and "smash the fash" is not going to save you.

Sweet dreams!



and without subtitles:

Anti-Racist Liberals Hoisted by their own Police State Petard

Satire is no defence: Lock 'em up.

Liberals and Anti-Racists, egged on by the overpaid (via taxpayers' funds) Race Lobby, often staffed by extreme communist or corrupt money-grubbers, have long called for more Police State powers to target "racists."

These "racists" are often just decent people who are fed up of mass coloured immigration, or whop oppose the gradual take-over of England by millions of non-Europeans. In and of itself there is nothing wrong with that opinion. It is not illegal. It is not hateful. It is certainly not nihilistic or anarchic.

This has not stopped the institutionally anti-white Race Lobby nor the institutionally liberal and corrupt "leaders" of the political, lawyer, police and media classes from conspiring to target those who are opposed to immigration, often painting them as "racists," "fascists," "extremists," "neo-nazis" and so on ad infinitum.

These people, a mixture of posh liberals and Freemasons and (ex) Marxist agitators, have tried to make opposition of multi-culturalism and/or mass coloured immigration (a thing most people would have agreed with a few decades ago) criminal.

So it is with some joy we find out that the anti-racists of the "Red Attitude" Manchester United fanzine have had copies removed by the police and a threat to have the issue destroyed, because they used a KKK image, albeit as a means to attack Liverpool fans who have 'dared' to stand up and defend Luis Suarez. The Liverpool fans don't seem to understand (or rather they do and they don't like it) that in the post-Macpherson Report world, when a coloured person thinks he is the recipient of "racism" it ipso facto (regardless of the facts) becomes a racist crime!

This is of course itself racist, because if I report a crime as racist as a white man, simply because I assume it to be so, the police will probably ignore me or even treat me as a 'white racist' for stirring up trouble.

That the Man Utd fanzine was grabbed from the hands of their supporters outside Old Trafford on the State's ridiculous anti-racist twisted politically correct generalisations has some deliciousness about it. Let the liberals, Marxists and anti-racists moan all they like: they have created this crass stupidity wherein items can be grabbed, editors can be arrested, writers can be jailed and mags/books can be banned - not for obscenity, not for offending public morals, not for promoting terrorism or violence: but merely for going against what the modern-days lords and masters say is correct as regards multi-racism and immigration.

So, let's pretend we are as twisted as those treacherous, commie, anti-white commissars and say, with tongue firmly in cheek:

LOCK 'EM UP! PULP RED ATTITUDE. 

It's the only way to protect the public and democracy!

Searchlight Get it Wrong: Stalinist Conspiracy Nutters Strike Again

Searchlies get it oh so wrong - again!

An old friend (in the sense of our acquaintance rather than his age) sent me a link earlier today to a piece in Searchlies magazine which proposes a conspiracy involving the Front National, Vichy French "war criminals," all manner of "anti-Semites" (of course!), Traditionalist Catholics, a "New Right" faction, revisionists, Mosleyites, occultists and Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.

The article had as its bete noir, Bishop Williamson (oh they mentioned his dubious excommunication, but not that it had been publicly lifted) and yet they could not even get the right cleric in the photo accompanying the piece! Is it a case of "they all look the same to me guvnor?"

Such research. And they are the "experts" on "international fascism." As a Mr. F. Christmas might intone: "ho ho ho."

It's ages since I had such a good laugh. It reminded me of a piece in Searchlies years ago about the ITP which linked much of the above alongside Baltic nationalists, SS veterans, the IRA, the UDA, "violent" Pro-Lifers, skinheads, neo-nazis, British monarchists, and many others too. It was quite the roll call.

Dere wuz Nazis, priests, Vichy dudes, 911 deniers...

And they call us conspiracy theorists!

Anyhow, in the intro to this latest piece of drivel, it of course brings up the fact that the meeting/convention/conspiracy in question was held on Remembrance Sunday and how nationalists (sorry, "nazis") had for years "desecrated" Remembrance Sunday by marching to the cenotaph.

Now there a number of things here, not least the "freedom of speech" that we are supposed to have fought for. But think of the Stalinists/Communists and extreme Zionists that make up Searchlies, with their roots in the gangland sleazy underbelly of London's Soho and their hardline Stalinist cadre for many years. Democrats? Hmmm.

The writer John Mortimer QC, who was the creator of Rumpole of the Bailey, was giving a talk on his life to an audience, recorded for the radio, and in that he admitted that he, the only son of a barrister and public schoolboy at Harrow naturally became a member of the Communist Party (CP). He received letters from the 'Central Committee' of the CP - he joked that he was a "one man cell" at Harrow.

This was at the start of WW2, when Germany and Russia had signed a peace treaty, and so the letters Mortimer was receiving told him to "go slow" on production for the war. So the Communists were putting out the line that this was not a war they could in any way support.

This same fact is exposed in the autobiography I Believed by Douglas Hyde, who worked at the very highest levels of the CP, its inner sanctum if you will. He said that there was rank hypocrisy because the CP was arranging a "go slow" in 1940 and thereabouts and condemning Britain's war as a Capitalist war, whereas post June 1941 they completely changed tune.

Mortimer said that after June '41 he received the same letters from the CP asking him to urge flat-out production for the war effort. Of course he wasn't in a position to do much from the opulent halls of Harrow.

The Jewish author Arthur Koestler (who wrote The Thirteenth Tribe, detailing how most Jews were latter converts, and had no relation to Biblical Jewry) dealt with this in his (anti-nazi) book Scum of the Earth in which he attacked the CP in France. Interestingly although it was written in the Spring of 1941, the book was published after Operation Barbarossa started and the CP did a swift about-turn. Koestler stood by what he had written. The pacifists and saboteurs became war-mongers and factory cheerleaders.

Of course Communists (like Searchlies) prefer to ignore this, just as they and Capitalists prefer to forget the the Soviet Union invaded Poland on September 17th, 1939.

I have always wondered why Britain and France declared war on Germany just a few days after their invasion of Poland, yet they took no such action when the Soviet Union invaded and occupied the Eastern half of Poland (and the Baltic States).

Indeed, whilst fascists were rounded up and interned (in a concentration camp) in 1940 no such action was taken against the CP which was still free to mail-out to its members, asking them to "go slow" on war production. Some suggest that hardline Communists may even have sabotaged war production in order to help the USSR's then ally, 'Nazi' Germany. Why? Why did Soviet Russia and its acolytes abroad have such a charmed existence after it invaded Poland in 1939?

So the next time Searchlies witter on about "nazis" defiling the cenotaph, someone might ask them why Stalinists like them changed sides, and went from undermining the war effort to becoming "super patriots?" We might also ask why the Zionists at Searchlies pretend to salute the British Army for being the defenders of democracy, when Searchlies' comrades in Palestine were blowing up British servicemen and civilians in terror attacks in the 1940s. They even booby-trapped the bodies of dead soldiers in order to kill more, and so achieve their dream of a Jewish state on the graves of Brits and Arabs.

If that isn't good enough, ask the Reds who witter on about the cenotaph if they remember the dead killed fighting Communism in Korea? Or don't they include the Korean War dead when they talk of the cenotaph as a "sacred" place?

Douglas Hyde saw through the lies and spin of the CP in 1941 and left the CP.

John Mortimer QC saw through the lies and spin of the CP in 1941 and left the CP.

The only time the kooks at Searchlies ever left the CP was when the CP turned against their precious Israel. The Searchlies crew preferred hardline Zionism to hardline Communism, only to return to the Red Flag when hardline Reds (or those they could find) also accepted Zionism.

One wonders if they will oppose war with Iran, as so many Socialists seem likely to do, or urge it on as so many Zionists already are. Could it be that as with Searchlies so many internecine squabbles with their would-be allies in the left-wing and anti-racist ranks in the past, Searchlies will give first preference to Israel and that cause. Who knows... they may even condemn some fellow lefties as being "anti-Semites" as they did against Norwegian Communists just a few years back when they realised that top level bankers and the Neo Cons pushing war were of a certain type.

Indeed one may wonder that when they day comes that British soldiers stop being the cannon fodder of America's Israel lobby, how much longer Searchlies will treat the cenotaph as a Holy place which only the people they deem worthy should visit?

As FC exposed years ago, the people at Searchlies, the "defenders of democracy" are just as much hypocrites as the CP of the 1940s. They have included pimps, burglars, arsonists, extremist Reds, hardline Zionists and much more in their own ranks!

And when you see the conspiracies they dream up... it's a wonder anyone takes them seriously, at all.

Milibands Show That Politics Remains a Con

There's a few stories floating around today about the Miliband brothers.

One is that David, who wanted to be Labour Party leader but failed, is now working for a City firm, making big money.

Brothers in arms?

The other is that Ed, who won the Labour Party leadership, is pictured getting into a flash sports care carrying a "green" shopping bag.

This all shows a number of things:

• The political 'leaders' all come from the same mould. 
• They think they are doing us "a favour" by not taking mega-bucks jobs and 'slumming it' in Westminster for a few hundred grand a year.
• Their friends and associates belong to the mega-bucks world, so they have no knowledge of normal life, of struggling to pay bills, of living in low-cost housing in the multi-culti hell they have created.
• That they can walk out of politics to plush jobs and placements. The more bankers etc. they help while in power, the more rewards they stand to get afterwards.
• These people - as politicos or financiers - jet around the world, yet lecture us on turning off light bulbs to 'save the planet.'
• They will carry "green" shopping bags whilst using "gas guzzling" super cars.

That is the world of the political elite. Just as when they start their foreign wars, sending in troops to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria (resulting in countless tens of thousands of innocent deaths), they sit safely back in Westminster plotting their non-executive placements. They talk of 'feeling the pain' of ordinary people, yet give knighthoods to usurers that cause debt.

It is all a con.

Of course the Milibands are the offspring of extremist Jewish Marxists, but they have embraced Capitalist greed, Zionist wars and the same old cycle of betrayal and reward.

It is a world of hypocrisy and hyperbole, of do as I say, not as I do, of practicing never ending war whilst preaching 'climate change' and one world humanism. And the Milibands fit in just fine and dandy.

Time for a Holocaust Musical? We've had Everything Else...

It was Ricky Gervais's and Stephen Merchant's series Extras which ran the episode in which it was stated that a film about the holohoax guarantees an Oscar. Now there's a truism.

Whilst an extremely well made and extremely popular film about Jesus Christ (The Passion of The Christ) was deliberately blocked by distributors and from the main Oscar awards, every big film about the holohoax, in reality war and pro-Israeli propaganda being relived time and time again for various vested interests (which Norman Finkelstein has labelled the "Holocaust Industry"), is a virtual shoe-in for an Oscar.

We have even had a Jewish film maker (Mel 'Brooks' Kaminsky) make a musical comedy (The Producers) about the Third Reich (not to mention Tarantino's "torture porn" and semi-sexual fantasies of Inglorious Basterds). So how far away are we from a musical comedy about the holocaust?

Cue the Evil German and the Avaricious Collaborators

Oh sure the usual people who decry it as "insensitive," but in reality they would love it as it would remind us all of how Jews (and no-one else?) suffered in WW2, how the deliberate industrial-scale mass extermination of Jews was a policy of the Third Reich, and bring the holohoax to a whole new level of people who might never watch The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas or The Reader.

Too low? Really? I don't think it would be too low for them - we are talking of a group of people who insist on the holohoax being a shoe-in on any historical film, whether it is sexual (The Reader), about children (...Striped Pyjamas), a musical (The Producers), violent and retributive (Inglorious...), about "good" Germans (Schinler's List), about rebellion (Defiance) or even about Science Fiction (X Men).

Every angle has been covered. On the other hand Communism killed circa 100 million people in the 20th Century, but you'd be hard-pressed to find any major film, certainly any Hollywood blockbuster or Oscar-nominee, which tackled the torture, starvation, death and gulags of Communism (be it Soviet or other).

Is it cos I is Christian?

One might surmise why this is: the victims were Christians, Communism was Jewish (as Winston Churchill pointed out). Indeed, Michael Hoffman has written how the mass murderers of Communism transformed themselves into "holocaust survivors" in one fell swoop.

Meanwhile in America various people, from ADL boss Abe Foxman to actor Marlon Brando have stated that Jews run Hollywood. The difference is that when folks like Joel Stein say it they are cheered, when gentiles like Brando or Gibson say it their careers are attacked.

"The Jews are so dominant," writes [LA Times columnist] Joel Stein, "I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies." "But lo and behold," Stein says, "even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew!"

"As a proud Jew," says Stein, "I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood."

So if the powers-that-be (aka the you-know-who's) decide we need an all musical on the holocaust - we'll get it, along with a media kerfuffle designed to make it a household subject again.

Link:

Jews on Hollywood/Media Control

Workers of the World Unite - You Need More Slavery & Bosses

1898 artwork by Caran D'Ache

This artwork is very interesting.

In the first picture the worker is under the weight of the monarchy/rich.

Interestingly we see the Church in the background. Today of course Communists (founded and egged on by Anti-Christ Talmudics) and atheists (ditto) say the Church suppressed the workers on behalf of the rich.

As anyone who has studied history and Church teaching knows, the Church acted as Europe's conscience, pushing the rich to give alms to the poor. The church provided hospitals for the sick and infirm, provided peppercorn rents for workers (who would, post-Reformation be thrown of the land, which the uncontrolled rich enclosed*)

Just as things worsened for the poor after the Reformation, when the King, monarchy and rich were no longer controlled by the Church and its laws,  so after the French Revolution they worsened considerably.

In D'Ache's picture we see the Royalty replaced by the bankers, Freemasons and rich; whilst their daily toil did not improve or worsened under the weight of the new elites.

This is the reality. The rulers had to jettison Christianity's hold over society - and especially its ethical and moral rules on economics and commerce, which allowed Capitalism to rise, with its new elites based on money-power, usury and greed. This in turn was used by the Judeo-Masons as an excuse to organise Communist groups as the "answer" to the slums and poor conditions created by Capitalism.

Communism, of course, does not give freedom, but yet more slavery, more despots, more centralised wealth, and so the con goes on, mirrored today in the Left V Right see-saw of politics. Taxes continue, Usury and Bank-Cons go on, immoral anti-family laws roll on...

And the poor, hard-working people plod on under the weight.

Of course, back in the day I suppose the bankers and reds never had Eastenders to tell the dim-witted what was right or acceptable.



* Read William Cobbett's History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland for a superb socio-economic analysis of these events (btw Cobbett was not a Catholic).

Socialist, Communist and Anarchist Slogans Interpretated

"Bigger State! Bigger State!"

The Fourth International is not the latest play-off match for the world cup.

Das Kapital is not Berlin.

No Pasaran - and no it's not Paris either.

Stop the Cuts is not an anti-guillotine retrospective

No war but the class war is not a pacifist slogan of inner city teachers.

You Have Nothing to Lose But Your Chains is it an airport warning notice to S&M deviants?

Such a good slogan he grabbed a few

Lenin lived, Lenin lives, Lenin will live! is not a Dr Frankenstein manifesto promise.


Tax the Rich and everyone else to the hilt to pay for shysters.


LGBT isn't the Lettuce, Granary, Bacon and Tomato sandwich appreciation society?

Troops Out is not a call for new pink uniforms for LGBT soldiers.

Right to Work and the biggest right not to work!

This Comrade was expelled for just not trying!

Capitalism Kills as much as Communism and Atheism (slogan of the Jealous League).

Smash the State because an even bigger State is needed.

No Justice No Peace, Lord Justice No-Peace QC didn't go along with the MacPherson Report which he called a chip-on-shoulder immigrants' charter. Boo.

Property is Theft is why no Anarcho-Reds live in posh houses (Islington, Chiswick, Golders Green etc.)!

Not the Church Not the State, Women Must Decide Their Fate and what's for tea, oh no not egg and chips again?

and not forgetting: More gulags, grey blocks of flats and queues for food, and less nice stuff, which is surprisingly honest.



Now send in your leftie slogans and possible interpretations. And make them fun, fun, fun!

(no swear words please)




And for some real fun look at this lefty forum site Urban 75 to see how even lefties argue amongst themselves about their "No Borders" slogan and policy. Should the proles get wound up by lefties shouting "no borders" before returning to mummy and daddy's white-flight rural retreat for the holidays or should they cover up their beliefs and go for something more populist and so not frighten the genuine workers?

Bishop Williamson, Consumersim and the Gulags

This blog has an interesting video of an interview with a friend of Bishop Williamson.

He deals with that interview (the holocaust one), but also consumerism, Communism (inc the gulags) plus abortion, homosexuality and many modern evils.

He is clearly a well-educated author and his argument and views are very interesting.

Dr White Interview - 20 minute clip

Atheism Killed 100 Million

If there's one thing about atheists it's that they like to blame everything on God - who doesn't exist. Eh? So next they blame those of us taken in by the "god delusion."

We are thick, stupid and ignorant. They are all-wise, forward-thinking and intelligent. We believe in "myths" while they believe in (unproven) "facts" like the Big Bang and Evolution. They weren't there at the "Big Bang" nor have they found the 'missing link' -- it's a leap of faith you see.

They say that religion causes war, whereas atheism will bring peace to all mankind. The Brotherhood of Man. As well as being a cheesy 70s pop quartet that is a Masonic ideal. Like "equality." It sounds all fine and dandy, until you realise what it, and the manifestation of it in the real world, entails.

Atheism has always been the football of the Freemasons. They have sought to destroy Christianity via the promotion of atheism. That's why the French Revolution was followed inevitably by the Terror, the period when umpteen thousands lost their lives because they did not want to be part of the new atheist state, because they would not give up their Faith, they became 'enemies of the State,' as people who live under atheist regimes quickly find out to their cost, if you don't toe the line, they come down on you like a ton of bricks.

You see atheists like to put it about that they are "live and let live" kind of people. Some may think they are! Yet they and their ideal is essentially a negation of Christianity. They may warble on about Animists in Africa, and giggle at Aboriginal tales of creation, but these fireside stories of pagan peoples are brought in to the mix to belittle Christianity - their Public Enemy Number One.

Atheism was born in Europe and is nurtured by European Freemasonry. They were behind the French Revolution. They supported the Bolshevik Revolution (as did the Wall Street Banks run by mega-rich atheists, Masons and anti-Christians). They will always support any movement that seeks to overthrow Christianity, because Christianity is the number one enemy.

On Twitter recently I have been arguing with a band of atheists (I know, pearls before swine), and have said to them that the officially atheist USSR murdered millions of Ukrainian Christians. This is atheism. They will not have it. They argue it's political. They argue not all atheists are Communists.

But they are twisting (or spinning) the facts. An officially atheist state murdered millions of Christians, as policy. Just as they shut down churches. Just as they put Christians in the gulags.

The facts speak for themselves. As does the anti-Christian hatred of the atheists across Europe (all backed by Masonic ideals) whether in Spain, Hungary, France... these atheists forces were spurred on by a hatred of Christianity. Remember the dead bodies of nuns exhumed on the steps of the local church and opened to rot in the sun? That was done by the "democrats" - the Republicans - in the Spanish Civil War. Were the nuns "fascists"? No, they were dead women. The Republicans, democrats or whatever the hell they were did that because they were atheists and hated Christianity!

Can you imagine a Christian army that would dig up dead atheist nobodies, and dump the bodies in the street outside some atheist building, just to make a point? Out of pure hatred? No, neither can I.

Now the atheists always point at religion as being responsible for wars. They ignore that most wars in history were over land, wealth, ascendancy etc. and often between cousins, related peoples etc. Think of the wars between England and France (at the time both Catholic nations) primarily because England was ruled by a Francophone monarchy with a claim (rightful or dubious depending whether you were English or French) to the French crown and lands. It was essentially a family squabble, you might compare it to the War of the Roses.

Yet many atheists will sit and say that the wars like these were caused by religion. How absurd.

The only wars caused directly by religion were those of the Crusades and those following the Reformation, and in those limited cases we should remember that (as with irreligious or 'normal' wars) there are things known as "just wars" and those known as "unjust wars."

One thing is perfectly clear though, in the whole history of the wars "caused by religion" (as opposed to territorial or national wars) these pale in significance to the 100 million people killed by Communism in the 20th Century alone.

Dare I remind you that Communism is/was an atheist creed? Some would argue its very raison d'etre is to wipe out Christianity, so that the poor sods left living worship the State and only the State.

If we had a State in the 20th century that was officially theist, and its policy was the spread of Christianity (hint: there are none now, France long has been Masonic, the UK too, as was the USA from its inception), that murdered dozens of millions of atheists in its policy to impose Christianity on the world, then the atheist apologists on Twitter and elsewhere would be screaming from the very rooftops!

Yet we had a State that was officially atheist. It was called the USSR. It murdered many dozens of millions of innocent men, women and children because they were Christians. They were killed because Christians were a threat to their Brave New World, their atheist state, which would export its atheist materialism across the world.

The atheists who like to bang on about the Franco-Anglo wars between inter-related Royalty in which mostly professional soldiers and army conscripts died as internecine squabbles over land and power rumbled back and forth for years, get all defensive when the deliberate murder of millions of Christians is brought up.

They twist, they turn, the squeal, they screech. Oh the usual words such as "bigot" are thrown around willy-nilly and even "conspiracy" as they deny history and the death of millions at the hand of a state machinery (which should be illegal shouldn't it? - it is in Germany!).

You see one of the few officially atheist states in the world carried out the worst and biggest mass murder of men, women and children ever in the entire history of the world.

They can squeal and they can squirm, but no twisting the facts, no denying this holocaust, no misrepresentation, no calumnies against the innocent victims, can undo the horrific crime perpetrated by the officially atheist USSR against Christian victims.

Once again, I ask you: imagine if an officially Christian country (there are none today outside the Vatican City statelet, hardly a serious nation-state) purposefully wiped out millions of atheists as a matter of state policy to get rid of atheists or break their resolve as a thorn-in-the-side of the Christian state. Do you think those same atheists would say "oh no it wasn't a really Christian state" or "it's more complicated than that really?" -- These are people who say countless political/national/territorial/fratricidal conflicts were the fault of Christianity with little or no evidence.

Atheists killed 100 million people in the 20th Century. We can blame the Masons, the Communists, whatever. The fact remains:

ATHEISM KILLED 100 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE 20TH CENTURY.

So Mr. Beardie in your Hush Puppies, Mr. DJ Funk-master with your line of coke, Mr. City Banker with your house in the Cotswolds or Mr Anarcho-lefty with your black flag and allowance from mummy: accept the cold, hard fact that whatever else you may promise, the Brotherhood of Man quickly gives way to the State of the Gulag.

As GK Chesterton once said, the problem with atheism is not that when men stop believing in God they believe in nothing, rather that they will believe in anything. Even the worn out lies, hatred, spin, and fury of the atheists themselves, who will always push for what is not wanted or needed (gay marriage, legalisation of hard drugs, restriction of border controls, widespread abortion, break-up of the family and so on, etc. etc. etc.) simply because it helps bring about the end of the last vestige of Christianity in our society, cannot disguise these simple facts.

Man always needs a belief system and a moral code. Nature abhors a vacuum (especially when the football's on - sorry, dad joke). So without Christianity we have to have, one way or another, a replacement - that's when we end up with State Socialism, Bankers' greed, homo-rights, mass abortion, rampant usury, criminals' rights etc. etc. etc.

The atheists will promise peace but deliver war. They will promise happiness but deliver fear. They will promise love but deliver hatred. They will promise plenty but deliver want. They will promise freedom but deliver the gulag.

Remember. Atheism killed 100 million in the last century.

Given half a chance they would gladly do the same all over again. Their barely concealed hatred for those who "dare" to defend Christianity and Christian Truth is there for all to see. In 1917 the powerful Wall Street banks bank-rolled the Communist Revolution, because the same anti-God forces were at work in Wall Street. Today the children of 1968 run the EU. "Ex" Communists infest it from top to bottom, as can be seen from the laws their undemocratic executive pass against the family, against decency, for the atheist State etc. etc.

The names, places and means have changed. But the idea, the aim remains the same.


It started when they rounded up the "fascists." I did not speak out because I wasn't a fascist.
Then they rounded up the "pro-lifers." I did not speak out because I wasn't a pro-lifer.
Then they rounded up those opposed to gay "marriage." I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to gay "marriage."
Then they rounded up those opposed to immigration. I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to immigration.
Then they rounded up the Anti-EU lobby. I did not speak out because I wasn't in the anti-EU lobby.
Then they rounded up the Christians. I did not speak out because I wasn't a Christian.
Then they came for me...


Think on. 

All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace: A Must See for anyone Interested in "Jewish Revolutionaries"

Last night's BBC documentary All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace, made by Adam Curtis who produced The Power of Nightmares, was very interesting.

Right: Alan Greenspan, boss of the private bank the Federal Reserve, which keeps Americans as tax-debt-slaves. The main follower of "Rand"/Rosenbaum is now one of the most powerful men in the world.

It showed that the ideology behind consumerism, banking free markets, individualism, etc. that the internet, dot.com bubble and banking boom of the 90s was run by the usual suspects.

Ayn Rand, the basis of the first episode was born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum. Curtis neglects to tell us this, perhaps for fear of being labelled an Anti-Semite.

Her ideology "Objectivism" - is pure individualism, one might say Thatcherism taking to an extreme, and devoid of morality. One of her top followers was Alan Greenspan. Her grouplet fell apart when she had an affair with one of her married followers.

Degenerates, Talmudic bankers, et al. These are the Modern Degenerates and Jewish Revolutionaries written about by E Michael Jones. They dress themselves up in new clothes, tweak their ideologies (just as Neo Cons went from being Marxists to Free Marketeers), anything to create a One World, Talmudic, Banking-led, godless world.

Just as Bolshevism in 1917 and the creation of the Federal reserve in 1913 - these people are only interested in having a Masonic elite ruling over us plebs.

Times change. Names change. But the ideologies and aims remain much the same.

I am reminded of the time the "dissidents" in Iran staged their demonstrations. Thousands of people took to the streets (kind of like the anti-war or pro-hunting demos here), and the Western media spun it into 'the people' rising against a corrupt oligarchy. This was fueled by the 'democratising' Twitter phenomenon. Only it transpired that so many Twits, Twuts or Twats, were coming out of areas like New York and Jerusalem.

This is what the "democratic internet" people do not understand. Just as the elites realised that they could control the mass media, through advertising revenues, direct control by oligarchies etc., so they can control the internet, by orchestrated campaigns dumping sheer volumes of Tweets, emails, reports etc., the setting up of "alternative" or news sources - and so much more.

If Twitter were the answer, the BBC wouldn't refer to it every time there is some sort of crisis or regime change in the world.

As Curtis's documentary made clear - just as with the Bolshevik Revolution (which was also Talmudic and godless) this revolution of computing mass-democratising individualism, led to yet more centralised control by a Talmudic few (in this case Greenspan and the Federal Reserve and the big Wall Street banks).

Plus ca change.