Ofcom Move Against Press TV: Neo-Con Pressure?

It seems Press TV, the Iranian English language news service, is to be taken off British TVs.

Yet we are told we have "freedom of speech" by the few Masons who run the media in the UK.Unlike Channel 4 and 5 Press TV doesn't put out porn. Unlike the Zionist Richard Desmond, Press TV doesn't publish hardcore porn. Unlike BBC1 and BBC2 Press TV doesn't undermine public decency and morality by promoting homosexuality, blasphemy or using foul language.

Still, if a channel does not publish porn, filth, blasphemy and crudities it can still be pushed out of the UK, on a technicality, if it is opposed to the Neo-Con and Israeli interests.

What is it the system fears? Aren't we allowed to watch an alternative to BBC/ITV/Sky News?

Watch Press TV this week (on Sky channel 515) while you can. If they push out Press TV, Nationalists should also check in from time to time on Russia Today (Sky 512). It's a good way to get an alternative view to the Pinko-leftist and Neo-Con Capitalist views of the "establishment" channels, whether it's their headline news programmes or in-depth features, interviews etc.


Link:
Ofcom's move against Press TV

Channel 4's BNP/NF Documentary: Young, Angry & White: A Response

The Young, Angry and White documentary on Channel 4 tonight was interesting.

The young man - Kieran - came across as intelligent, well-humoured and (dare I say?) "normal."

Unlike Channel 4's previous offerings (especially Young Nazi and Proud) there were no semi-naked posing, no half-mental "I wish I lived in Hitler's time" meanderings or other nutty offerings from a wannabe fuhrer.

The voice-over tried to justify the protagonist's 'racism' via all sorts of psycho-babble (you see the militant left see anyone who is "racist" or "anti-Semitic" as quite literally mad) because in their world they simply cannot see that any people - let alone European, White Christians - wish to simply live in peace amongst their own kith and kin.

It's not about hatred, superiority or inferiority on any side.

It is purely about being with our own people and not having to mop up the mess of a failed multi-culti experiment which has not "enriched" us in any way!

Are Cornish fishermen culturally destitute? Is the Highland crofter poor in his life experience? Was the Berkshire small-holder bereft of any self-fulfillment? Is the Welsh cafe-owner robbed of a heritage, of a sense of belonging? Has the Lancastrian mother been denying her children a birthright?

I see this idea of immigration "enriching" us not only materially wrong (it has enriched the bosses who use immigrants to undercut wages), but culturally, spiritually and in almost every other feasible way. It is trying to say that our own culture(s) are poor, are weak, are malnourishing our children and offer nothing for the future.

And if (as most politiocians opine) it is just about food and music can't we import that? Can't we watch that on TV if that is our desire?

Why did we have to give over our land to millions of non-Europeans on order to eat an occasional curry or listen to African music - if that is what is being sold to us?

I think Kieran has it right in this TV programme. We simply want what is ours. We had a healthy European multi-culturalism before and it worked fine, the cultures of Europe mixed well and we had Italian cafes, we had German churches, we had Irish pubs, we had French restaurants, we had Polish centres and much more besides.

The cultures of Europe can provide us with all we need, without being swamped by millions of people who do not share our European ancestry, our common faith and heritage, our core ideals.

A smattering of European settled communities worked well because there was just the right amount of assimilation, and just the right amount of traditional culture.

The non-Europeans meanwhile have come in their millions and separate or "assimilated" it is not working. The offspring, second and third generation, have no sense of their own identity and that breeds contempt, lawlessness and worse to the detriment of all. The multi-culti, multi-racial and multi-faith miasma is ripping away the innards of our identity, our sense of community, our sense of right and wrong, our sense of belonging.

Besides which, as I have always said to any rabid multi-racialist or red -- if it was right for the Indians to take back their country in the 1940s, why is it wrong for us to want to take back our own country in the 2010s?

If the enemies of nationhood say one is right and one is wrong then that shows their racism - that they are biased against us for being White, European and Christian and wanting our own land.

Is the Indian in India more deserving of his birthright than the Englishman in England?

Towards the end of the programme Kieran did, imho, come to the correct conclusion about the BNP.

If he wants to join a party that is opposed to race-mixing how can he join one that is now promoting integration and assimilation? That is simply counter-intuitive and counter-productive.

As for the hooded figures part way through the programme - I have to say I empathised with their view. It was clear and principled - with a solid anti-Capitalist stance (cosmopolitanism, consumerism et al) and a healthy anti-Communist position too.

My sole criticism would be the hoodies and scarves, I would say either ignore the enemy media, or if you must use it - put up a spokesman that is clean-cut, normal and doesn't need to hide. But each to his own, as I said what they actually put across had a resonance which appealed. It had the social-justice angle so often missing from those trying to ape right-wing Tories.

As a final point, near the end Kieran seemed to be questioning his future in nationalism, though I think this was more to do with the BNP's betrayal of any racialism, and he seemed to be settled more with the NF activists.

If he is still unsure - and maybe he will read this or a friend will pass it on - I would simply say, stick with it. There will always be times when you are defecated upon. There will be traitors and hypocrites. Parties will come and go - and let you down.

But remember that our cause is greater than any of those and you will also meet some of the most genuine people in our cause - who will remain friends for life beyond this or that organisation.

In short, to quote a certain long-haired gent from the 1980s: don't let the bastards grind you down.

Channel 4's Dispatches on You Tube

Link:
Dispatches; Israel's Lobby on You Tube

Alternative Allotments

Have a look at this website – it is a marvellous idea. It is simply a way of putting those in touch who want some land, on which to grow fruit and veg, with landowners. There is also the chance for people to pass on their experience to others. In one town there is a 40 years (yes, years not weeks) for an allotment, perhaps this could become a viable alternative.

Link:
Land Share

Good Golly! Carol Thatcher Sacked by BBC for Gollywog Remark

Yes - the BBC has sacked Carol Thatcher for making a remark in a private conversation on BBC property that a tennis player had hair like a Gollywog.

Right: Good Golly Miss Molly! Whilst guns and drugs litter our cities, whilst England has its identity ripped apart, the pc brigade get upset over an historical character from literature and cartoons.

The BBC has banned words like Wog and Nigger, whilst programmes that are anti-White and full of obscenities (that I find offensive) litter the airwaves.

Before too long moves will be made to ban Gollywogs.

It's all reminiscent of Colin Jordan's Merrie England 2000 book in which an old woman has to be "re-educated" for having a dog called Nigger (like the dog made famous in the film about the Dambuster Squadron -- you may remember Channel 4 blanked the name of the dog out of the film).

A friend of mine even had a visit from the police for having a Gollywog in his works vehicle.

So are these things illegal?

Er... no!

So why are the BBC so prissy? Why do the police care? And why have the Royal Family just banned them from their shops?

It's called political correctness.

With all sorts of filth aimed at our children (on TV, in magazines and in books) the Enid Blyton Noddy books were re-written to edit out the Gollywog character - and then re-made for TV too.

It's like Soviet Russia here!!!

All sorts of degenerate behaviour and language is not only allowed or accepted on TV and the media, it is promoted!

Yet "Gollywog" is beyond the fringe... sheesh! Get a life you moaning minnies.

Link:
Gollywog goodies from FC

This weeks newspapers:

Some Bloke Won 'The Apprentice'

Someone else Might Win 'Big Brother'

Tory Leader may Eventually Replace Labour leader.

Welcome to brain-dead UK plc.

TV Reports on the BNP: Spin & Lies

This was published as a comment on the Enough is Enough Blog:

Guessedworker said...

Transcript from the BBC’s flagship Newsnight on 18th December 2007. Reporter Paul Mason, speaking in the studio to Jeremy Paxman:-

"Well, there’s a bitter factional struggle going on inside the BNP right now, with people openingly accusing eachother on blogs of being “state assets”, which is code for MI5 agents, and the leadership calling the opposition, “neo-Nazis”.

Now, there’s essentially a personal spat going on between a senior BNP councillor in Nottingham, Sadie Graham. She was sacked as a party official, her computer was removed from her home by BNP security people, and subsequently to that a sound file of one of her telephone conversations appeared on the BNP’s website. As a result of all this, upwards of fifty local officers in the BNP have resigned. And today, on top of all this, the Labour MP John Cruddas, a man under pressure in his own constituency because there’s been a growing BNP influence there, put this dossier to parliament - 22 pages of detailed financial allegations under parliamentary privlege, the upshot of which was this ..."

[short excerpt from Cruddas’ statement in the Commons]

"Now I have spoken to the BNP’s Deputy Leader Simon Darby who points out that Mr Cruddas has a vested interest in slagging off the BNP. He says everything’s untrue. They’ve produced a detailed rebuttal on their website. Mr Darby said they would tomorrow produce their long-awaited 2006 financial accounts for the Electoral Commission ... that they’ve sacked the man responsible for delaying them ... and it was Mr Darby who used the words to me about the opposition that they have been discovered to be, he says, “hardline neo-Nazis”."

It is startling that Darby can try and cover-up by accusing Sadie Graham and Co. of being Neo-Nazis, given that not only were they in the upper echelons of the BNP until very recently, but he also knows that they in fact are "modernisers" sick, in part, with Collett's sieg-heiling antics.

Here is a link to a Channel 4 news report of the split. Notice that Channel 4 does not mention the burglary of Sadie Graham's home. As the BNP continue to spin against the "rebels" they are making this more acrid and increasing the resent felt by the "rebels," making more public pronouncements against the leadership's alleged criminality more likely.

Link:
TV Report on BNP Split

Littlejohn's Zionist Whitewash

So hands up. Who managed to sit through the entire programme tonight on Channel 4, fronted by Richard Littlejohn?

Everyone hates Jews - Jews hate no-one. Wasn't that how it went?

"Brave Little Israel" and so on. It was like a trip to Clichéville. Even Nick Cohen became non-Jewish (actually "I don't consider myself Jewish" -- aha a self-hater!!!).

If you believe what Littlejohn spouts you'd be forgiven in thinking the bodies of dead and mangled Jews were to be found in most towns and cities every other week!

What would have been obvious to anyone watching with a brain was that the actions of Israel and Zionist Jews have brought this about. We've been fed guilt for decades to silence criticism as Israel massacres, murders, expels and tortures.

Compared to the avalanche of thought, debate, argument and facts turning people against Israeli and Neo-Con terror, this TV programme was a pitiful response full of the old propaganda (the Protocols for goodness sake!) and who cares if some Asian corner shop is selling Mein Kampf in Arabic... hardly the same as invading a country and trying to kill and displace hundreds of thousands of civilians!

Still, there was one bright moment (or two) in this turgid Zionist propaganda. When Littlejohn was interviewing one of the Zionist "Community Security Trust" spokesmen who spotted the ITP 'US Govt Under Zionist Control' poster from over 10 years ago?

How prophetic and justified that smart glossy colour poster was!

It's nice to be proved right - by events - after all these years.

How unlike Nick Griffin's "anti-Semitism" in the BNP's The Rune... funny how some people's opinions change.

Anti-Semitism Everywhere?

One not to miss this week.

Channel 4, 8pm on Monday, there's a 'documentary' by wannabe-Neo-Con darling of the "right" Richard Littlejohn, entitled 'THE WAR ON BRITAIN'S JEWS'

Yes, expect all the usual claptrap defending the "poor Jews" (never met a poor one m'self).

In a puff-piece for the TV programme in today's Daily Mail we get an idea of where Richard "isn't Melanie Phillips dead right" Littlejohn is coming from.

Of course he goes on about Nazis - who doesn't? But he says that the main people spreading "hatred" (vomit bucket at the ready) are the Fascist left and the "Islamonazis."

It's like a Kosher-BNP training manual written by Lee Barnes!

Littlejohn says:

"Blaming Israel is the last refuge of Anti-Semitism."

No, Richard. Using the epithet of Anti-Semitism is the last refuge of the mad Neo-Con to silence any criticism of Zionism and Israel.

Some of the people surfacing in Littlejohn's magnum opus include:

Lorna Fitzsimons who used to be a MP for Rochdale. Will Littlejohn mention her Neo-Con credentials as a leading 'friend of Israel' campaigner?

Nick Cohen says he's appalled how many people support Hezbollah. Ho hum.

Two Jewish professors bemoan the academic boycott of Israel.

We even have the case of Ken Livingstone (hardly anti-Jewish!!!) and the comments he made to a journalist Oliver Finegold.

...And so on.

(right: Littlejohn has, like other Neo-Con journalists, constantly supported Bush and Blair's foreign wars all fought for Israeli benefit)

A plethora of instances where Jews don't like people having a pop at Israel, or supporting those who defend themselves from Israeli bully-boy terror tactics..

Hardly the kind of thing the Lebanese have had to put up with! Or the Palestinians, or the Iraqis... etc. etc.

Littlejohn should imagine an alien people taking over his country, murdering his people, poisoning his water supply, using terror and bombs, then forcing him and the survivors to flee to neighbouring countries where they'd be forced to live in shanty towns and refugee camps with no right to return to England - when any "co-patriot" of the invaders would have the automatic "right of return."

Then he might just begin to understand how the Palestinians feel.

Still, why let the truth of Zionism and Zionist crimes get in the way of some good melodramatic Neo-Con B.S.?

Let's hope Littlejohn gets richly rewarded for his Zionist waffle.

After all - the many victims of anti-Semitic crime deserve our support -- yes, you know, the Jews attacked, stabbed, shot and killed every week in our newspapers.

What do you mean you haven't heard about them? You must be an anti-Semite!

(left: Terrorism in Palestine started in the 40s when Jewish terrorists killed British servicemen and Arab civilians. This was followed by massive terrorism and ethnic cleansing of the indigenous people by the Zionists).

It reminds me of Melanie Phillips on the BBC's Question Time in the indefensible position of trying to excuse Israel's war-mongering and butchery, which the mixed audience was having none of, and was coming back at her with excellent points and rebuttals.

In her next Daily Mail column she wrote about the audiences' faces 'twisted with hatred' -- sheer nonsense of course, but whenever people argue forcefully and with conviction against Israel and Israeli crimes in the eyes of Phillips (and Littlejohn) it becomes "hate."

'Twas ever thus.



Link:
Littlejohn Goes Mad



----

Update (Sunday 8th July 9.50am):
An anti-Zionist comment was added to the Daily Mail web-site yesterday. This morning more pro-Zionist comments have appeared (the vast majority of comments are pro-Israel) but not the one we did.
It shows that the whole Daily Mail output is slanted towards spinning the news in favour of Israel and the Neo Cons.