Atheism Killed 100 Million

If there's one thing about atheists it's that they like to blame everything on God - who doesn't exist. Eh? So next they blame those of us taken in by the "god delusion."

We are thick, stupid and ignorant. They are all-wise, forward-thinking and intelligent. We believe in "myths" while they believe in (unproven) "facts" like the Big Bang and Evolution. They weren't there at the "Big Bang" nor have they found the 'missing link' -- it's a leap of faith you see.

They say that religion causes war, whereas atheism will bring peace to all mankind. The Brotherhood of Man. As well as being a cheesy 70s pop quartet that is a Masonic ideal. Like "equality." It sounds all fine and dandy, until you realise what it, and the manifestation of it in the real world, entails.

Atheism has always been the football of the Freemasons. They have sought to destroy Christianity via the promotion of atheism. That's why the French Revolution was followed inevitably by the Terror, the period when umpteen thousands lost their lives because they did not want to be part of the new atheist state, because they would not give up their Faith, they became 'enemies of the State,' as people who live under atheist regimes quickly find out to their cost, if you don't toe the line, they come down on you like a ton of bricks.

You see atheists like to put it about that they are "live and let live" kind of people. Some may think they are! Yet they and their ideal is essentially a negation of Christianity. They may warble on about Animists in Africa, and giggle at Aboriginal tales of creation, but these fireside stories of pagan peoples are brought in to the mix to belittle Christianity - their Public Enemy Number One.

Atheism was born in Europe and is nurtured by European Freemasonry. They were behind the French Revolution. They supported the Bolshevik Revolution (as did the Wall Street Banks run by mega-rich atheists, Masons and anti-Christians). They will always support any movement that seeks to overthrow Christianity, because Christianity is the number one enemy.

On Twitter recently I have been arguing with a band of atheists (I know, pearls before swine), and have said to them that the officially atheist USSR murdered millions of Ukrainian Christians. This is atheism. They will not have it. They argue it's political. They argue not all atheists are Communists.

But they are twisting (or spinning) the facts. An officially atheist state murdered millions of Christians, as policy. Just as they shut down churches. Just as they put Christians in the gulags.

The facts speak for themselves. As does the anti-Christian hatred of the atheists across Europe (all backed by Masonic ideals) whether in Spain, Hungary, France... these atheists forces were spurred on by a hatred of Christianity. Remember the dead bodies of nuns exhumed on the steps of the local church and opened to rot in the sun? That was done by the "democrats" - the Republicans - in the Spanish Civil War. Were the nuns "fascists"? No, they were dead women. The Republicans, democrats or whatever the hell they were did that because they were atheists and hated Christianity!

Can you imagine a Christian army that would dig up dead atheist nobodies, and dump the bodies in the street outside some atheist building, just to make a point? Out of pure hatred? No, neither can I.

Now the atheists always point at religion as being responsible for wars. They ignore that most wars in history were over land, wealth, ascendancy etc. and often between cousins, related peoples etc. Think of the wars between England and France (at the time both Catholic nations) primarily because England was ruled by a Francophone monarchy with a claim (rightful or dubious depending whether you were English or French) to the French crown and lands. It was essentially a family squabble, you might compare it to the War of the Roses.

Yet many atheists will sit and say that the wars like these were caused by religion. How absurd.

The only wars caused directly by religion were those of the Crusades and those following the Reformation, and in those limited cases we should remember that (as with irreligious or 'normal' wars) there are things known as "just wars" and those known as "unjust wars."

One thing is perfectly clear though, in the whole history of the wars "caused by religion" (as opposed to territorial or national wars) these pale in significance to the 100 million people killed by Communism in the 20th Century alone.

Dare I remind you that Communism is/was an atheist creed? Some would argue its very raison d'etre is to wipe out Christianity, so that the poor sods left living worship the State and only the State.

If we had a State in the 20th century that was officially theist, and its policy was the spread of Christianity (hint: there are none now, France long has been Masonic, the UK too, as was the USA from its inception), that murdered dozens of millions of atheists in its policy to impose Christianity on the world, then the atheist apologists on Twitter and elsewhere would be screaming from the very rooftops!

Yet we had a State that was officially atheist. It was called the USSR. It murdered many dozens of millions of innocent men, women and children because they were Christians. They were killed because Christians were a threat to their Brave New World, their atheist state, which would export its atheist materialism across the world.

The atheists who like to bang on about the Franco-Anglo wars between inter-related Royalty in which mostly professional soldiers and army conscripts died as internecine squabbles over land and power rumbled back and forth for years, get all defensive when the deliberate murder of millions of Christians is brought up.

They twist, they turn, the squeal, they screech. Oh the usual words such as "bigot" are thrown around willy-nilly and even "conspiracy" as they deny history and the death of millions at the hand of a state machinery (which should be illegal shouldn't it? - it is in Germany!).

You see one of the few officially atheist states in the world carried out the worst and biggest mass murder of men, women and children ever in the entire history of the world.

They can squeal and they can squirm, but no twisting the facts, no denying this holocaust, no misrepresentation, no calumnies against the innocent victims, can undo the horrific crime perpetrated by the officially atheist USSR against Christian victims.

Once again, I ask you: imagine if an officially Christian country (there are none today outside the Vatican City statelet, hardly a serious nation-state) purposefully wiped out millions of atheists as a matter of state policy to get rid of atheists or break their resolve as a thorn-in-the-side of the Christian state. Do you think those same atheists would say "oh no it wasn't a really Christian state" or "it's more complicated than that really?" -- These are people who say countless political/national/territorial/fratricidal conflicts were the fault of Christianity with little or no evidence.

Atheists killed 100 million people in the 20th Century. We can blame the Masons, the Communists, whatever. The fact remains:

ATHEISM KILLED 100 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE 20TH CENTURY.

So Mr. Beardie in your Hush Puppies, Mr. DJ Funk-master with your line of coke, Mr. City Banker with your house in the Cotswolds or Mr Anarcho-lefty with your black flag and allowance from mummy: accept the cold, hard fact that whatever else you may promise, the Brotherhood of Man quickly gives way to the State of the Gulag.

As GK Chesterton once said, the problem with atheism is not that when men stop believing in God they believe in nothing, rather that they will believe in anything. Even the worn out lies, hatred, spin, and fury of the atheists themselves, who will always push for what is not wanted or needed (gay marriage, legalisation of hard drugs, restriction of border controls, widespread abortion, break-up of the family and so on, etc. etc. etc.) simply because it helps bring about the end of the last vestige of Christianity in our society, cannot disguise these simple facts.

Man always needs a belief system and a moral code. Nature abhors a vacuum (especially when the football's on - sorry, dad joke). So without Christianity we have to have, one way or another, a replacement - that's when we end up with State Socialism, Bankers' greed, homo-rights, mass abortion, rampant usury, criminals' rights etc. etc. etc.

The atheists will promise peace but deliver war. They will promise happiness but deliver fear. They will promise love but deliver hatred. They will promise plenty but deliver want. They will promise freedom but deliver the gulag.

Remember. Atheism killed 100 million in the last century.

Given half a chance they would gladly do the same all over again. Their barely concealed hatred for those who "dare" to defend Christianity and Christian Truth is there for all to see. In 1917 the powerful Wall Street banks bank-rolled the Communist Revolution, because the same anti-God forces were at work in Wall Street. Today the children of 1968 run the EU. "Ex" Communists infest it from top to bottom, as can be seen from the laws their undemocratic executive pass against the family, against decency, for the atheist State etc. etc.

The names, places and means have changed. But the idea, the aim remains the same.


It started when they rounded up the "fascists." I did not speak out because I wasn't a fascist.
Then they rounded up the "pro-lifers." I did not speak out because I wasn't a pro-lifer.
Then they rounded up those opposed to gay "marriage." I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to gay "marriage."
Then they rounded up those opposed to immigration. I did not speak out because I wasn't opposed to immigration.
Then they rounded up the Anti-EU lobby. I did not speak out because I wasn't in the anti-EU lobby.
Then they rounded up the Christians. I did not speak out because I wasn't a Christian.
Then they came for me...


Think on. 

Clash of Civilisations: 2000 Years of Anti-Christian Hatred

I just began reading a book entitled The Stripping of the Altars by Cambridge Professor Eamon Duffy after reading his more recent book on the reign of Mary Tudor (both published by Yale University Press).

Right: Prof Duffy's book on the grass roots faith of the people of England.

The book deals with the grass roots religion of the English people from circa 1400 to 1580, written to show that the changes imposed under Henry VIII, but primarily under the reign of Edward VI, were not universally embraced, moreover they were piecemeal and grudgingly enforced, and so easily reverted under the reign of Mary Tudor (e.g. removed Rood screens secretly stored and simply replaced).

That gives you some background anyway.

In the preface to the second edition Duffy answers some of his critics in relation to the mater of the Lollards in the early 15th Century. He answers that the Lollards had little effect on the population as a whole. In fact, the Lollards are an interesting pointer to how sometimes the path to hell is paved with good intentions, because some who justly called for a return to charitable acts and godly priests became twisted enough to attack the sacraments of the Church.

Some of their fellow early Lollards even turned on them and attacked them for this. It kind of makes you think of the Reformation itself, with many people fed up of genuine corruption in the Church, but the assault on Churches, the pulling down of statues etc. speaks of a far more suspect motive.

As such Duffy discusses those in the 15th Century who were attacking the very idea of the sacraments, especially of Christ's body, blood, soul and divinity being present in the Eucharist.

He writes of a Mid-15th Century play called the Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which he thinks was written in Suffolk. Here he tries to show how short-lived and shallow was 'Lollardy' because by this time the play, which could have been used to sucker-punch the Lollards and "contemporary heresy" makes no mention of them at all.

As Duffy himself says:

"The anti-sacramentalists of the play are Jews."

And that, I think, is the nub of the reality.

It was well to question corruption in the church - as many did and do. This finally resulted in the Counter Reformation (and if you get the chance, for a startling account of the theological and political nature of it and its ramifications for Europe, read The Counter Reformation 1550 - 1600 by B.J. Kidd published by SPCK, the London-based Anglican in-house publisher).

The force which always pushed against the Church as it existed and the sacraments were, surprise surprise, the Jews.

Little surprise there as the Crucifixion of Christ was the act of their religious leaders 2000 years ago, and as any genuine Christian or Jew will say the Church and Christians of the 15th Century believed with its heart and soul that the Sacramental nature of the Mass, the central pillar of daily and weekly life for most folk, was a re-enactment of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion.

In short there were Altars in every Church in every city, town and village because you need an Altar for a Sacrifice; and the vast majority of English (and European) people believed in the Sacrificial nature of the Mass.

Those opposed to this were the Jews, who rejected Christ and His Church.

This is the lesson for all history.

Who publishes the movies that blaspheme and mock our Christian heritage? Who runs the banks that enslave our people, business and government in illegal anti-Christian usury? Who bankrolled and organised Communism that ushered dozens upon dozens of millions of Christians to their deaths in gulags and via enforced starvation? Who are disproportionally present in so many "Western" governments - governments that betray our people, enslave us, destroy ancient freedoms and bring in multi-culti anti-religion?

Who promoted Luther and his works to attack the Church, only to reject even his watered-down Christianity (much to his chagrin after all their help and anti-Papal diatribes he thought he would convert them all) and so cause him to retaliate by writing 'The Jews and their Lies?'

What of the Jewish printing presses in places such as Amsterdam which published tracts attacking the Inquisition in Spain?

This was the Church's attempt to overturn heresy in its own ranks (note: nobody outside the Church could be brought in front of it) by "conversos" - Jews who claimed to have converted to Christianity yet continued a form of "Crypto-Judiac" religion. And yet the Jewish printing preses churned out material purporting to attack the Church for some kind of "genocide" of Jews.

Indeed, so many people (for the right and wrong reasons!) point to the Spanish Inquisition as the forerunner to the Shoa/Holohoax; and the roll of a controlled media in both events cannot be overstated.

As one nationalist wrote in his article on 'the Sacred Nature of the Six Million' the attempt in more recent decades has been to remove the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as the centre of world history, the point in time that all peoples looked to, with the "sacrifice" of the "six million" in WW2.

Some folks think when the Jews rejected Christ they were looking for a new militaristic messiah that would bring their world empire (er... New World Order), with the Jews as the "chosen people" at the head of it.

Others think that the Jewish people, or their religious/political leaders, now consider themselves to be a kind of messiah (a form of Race worship), with a duty to control the world, bring "enlightenment" to the world (hence the role of Freemasonry etc.) and throw off the shackles of Christian "superstition."

Right: A satire on the French Revolution, yet in The Terror of the Masonic French Revolution, there was a real Talmudic bloodlust to murder all those who adhered to Christianity and Tradition. The hatred of Christianity saw a naked whore enthroned in a Cathedral as the goddess Reason, and the Eiffel Tower constructed on consecrated Hosts, to show the Masonic "victory" over Christ.

They founded Freemasonry as a "gentile Judaism" to bring about revolutions and amoral politrickery, and even Freemasons have admitted that their religion is Talmudic and Luciferian.

They founded Communism to bring about a revolution against Christianity and to establish their Utopian vision (of gulags and repression). Communists and Jews have admitted that Communism was Jewish.

They even founded Islam some 1400 years ago as a means to stop Christianity spreading eastwards to their new lands in the Khazaria region, to provide a buffer-zone.

Anyhoo, the issue here is that whether we look at Palestine at the time of Christ, 7th Century Arabia, Mid 15th Century England, 17th Century Spain, 18th Century France, 20th Century Russia, 21st Century America or so many other times and nations, the "Clash of Civilisations" is clear.

It has been a fight ongoing for 2000 years.

If we value our Christian heritage then we have to know our history, we have to know who our enemy is, and why they hate us and Christianity.

Unless we know all this, any resistance, any fight for national Independence is meaningless, because our historical enemy will merely take it and pervert it to their own ends.

If Nationalism becomes Zionist then it has lost before it has even got anywhere.

Poll on the Battle in Georgia

Should the USA be involved in Georgia?

Yes - it's all about Freedom	1 (3%)
No we're sick of US Imperialism and Neo Con meddling	16 (59%)
it depends on events there	1 (3%)
Only if Russia can get involved in Mexico/Canada	3 (11%)
I don't know or care.	0 (0%)
I still want the USA to get out of Confederate Georgia!!!	11 (40%)

It's comforting to know that most visitors to this site haven;'t been taken in by the political and media machine that is still pushing the idea that the Russians are the "trouble-makers" as opposed to the genuine source of the illegal shelling of civilian areas (so loathed in The Hague hearings!): the American regime and the Neo-Cons.

American Hypocrisy over Missile System in Poland.

The sight of "Condi Rice" signing the Missile Defense System agreement (note my USA spelling, I am busy trying to be 'inclusive') is enough to have me reaching for my ever-ready vomit bucket.

Right: A non-doctored photo as supplied by a Mr. Icke! ;-)

Can a state ever-willing to point the finger at others for their missile tests etc., be so cavalier in their attitude towards placing military hardware around the world?

Imagine Russia placed a "missile defence" instillation, bristling with hardware and with Russian fingers on the buttons/triggers in Mexico, or er Cuba (ring any bells?).

Would America accept platitudes that they wouldn't be pointing at anyone, or that they would only be used in defence?

Not on your nelly!

Here we see, yet again (in the shadow of Georgia's war crimes) how America and its allies seem willing and able to flaunt their military muscle however they see fit.

We all know that the UK is an unsinkable aircraft carrier for the USA. We suffer the shame of having American missiles present on our soil.

We don't want any more of this. We've had enough of American-Zionist wars, lies, subterfuge and double-dealing.

They sabre-rattle for war against Iran, when they turn a blind eye for the illegal nukes held by Israel.

They plan war crimes charges against Serb leaders when Georgian ones get support for their attacks on civilian areas.

Enough is enough.

South Ossetia: A Question for America, NATO and the UN

If the Serbs are guilty of war crimes for shelling Sarajevo circa 15 years ago, why aren't the US/Israeli-allied Georgian leaders guilty of war crimes for shelling South Ossetia?

Will the Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili be whisked off to The Hague to sit trial a la Milosevic?

Or are we - and the entire world - to believe, yet again, that criminality and war crimes can only be associated with the opponents of America?

Certainly the textbook example of Israel's illegality on so many counts would lead many to believe that this has been the case for some time!

Russia and Georgia: the roots of conflict

Today, one of the most grandiose criminal enterprises since the Iraq war unravelled like a half-price Marks and Spencer's jumper - a bid by the Georgian political élite and their esteemed allies to set the Caucasus alight with war, at Russia's expense.

What's clear is that the Georgians got a severe kicking, thanks to the chessmasters Putin, Lavrov and co.; what's not clear (if you swallow what the Western media has to offer you) is who started the whole affair.

Ignoring the usual he said/she said babble associated with war, to find out who's really behind a particular news story, you have to dig deep, and go back several months. As it turns out, our old friends in Tel Aviv have been up to their old tricks again. Here's the low-down:

1. According to the Israeli intelligence website, Debkafiles, last year the Zionist régime supplied Georgia with over a thousand military advisors and contractors, followed by a steady stream of weapons which, undoubtedly, were sourced from the United States. The U.S., accused of encouraging Georgia's actions in South Ossetia, are in fact only partly responsible this time around - and if you look at the links below, you'll find that Tbilisi and Tel Aviv are spiritually closer than you think.

It's plausible that the Israelis could have advised Georgia to go on their little killing spree in the belief that the Russians would invade and get bogged down in the Kodori Gorge, thus putting the kibosh on them coming to Iran's aid should the Israelis press ahead with their not-so-secret war plans. However, this plot seems to have failed miserably, and there is nothing the Americans, the Zionists or the Georgians can do about it.

2. The cabinet of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili is teeming with neocons and Jews. Educated in the U.S. himself, Saakashvili's prime minister, Lado Gurgenidze, is a UK national; the defence minister, Davit Kezerashvili (or should that be Khazar-ashvili?) is an Israeli national and "fluent Hebrew speaker"; while the "Reintegration Minister", Temur Yakobashvili, is a paid-up member of the tribe. This is the true colour of "the Rose Revolution", and it's only the tip of the iceberg.

3. This "revolution" is the latest of the CIA/Mossad-backed "colour" rebellions to hit the floor. The intervention in Ukraine has only partly succeeded, and may eventually split the country. With Serbia seething over Kosovo, plans for neocon normalisation there have gone belly-up, and now in Georgia, the "Rose Revolution" might just have been grayscaled. Plans to hem Russia in and destroy her influence in the world have been undermined by a brand of tactically and morally superior politician in Moscow.

4. Once again, the Western media - led enthusiastically by Murdoch, the Times and co. - has marched in step with the neoconservative agenda, depicting Russia as the schoolyard bully beating up the scrawny kid with the glasses. The reality is more a question of a schoolyard bully lashing out at one of his teachers, and deservedly suffering the consequences. The reality tells us that Georgia laid siege to a city of ethnic Russians, killed hundreds of them and a number of Russian peacekeepers, and believed George W. Bush and Rupert Murdoch would sweep them off their feet and lead them on a victory dance. The reality is that Saakashvili and the Western media began to believe their own deceptions, and have now created a geopolitically stronger Russia as a result.

For those who are still inclined to believe what they read in the Times, the starkest reality is that these are the same cretins and duplicitous hacks who told us that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and lied at the cost of an estimated one million dead Iraqis. They must answer for this and other deceptions.

Oh, and if they want to do some professional, objective reporting, they might leave Tbilisi for a while...

5. The Georgia fiasco is yet another silly featurette in the drama of a declining empire, and the ebb and flow of history eating away at the entity we know as ZOG. Putin's "multi-polar world" is now becoming a reality as Russia asserts herself as a beacon of decisiveness and patriotism. Happily for us, that Russia is slowly turning its back on abortion, overwhelmingly rejecting the immigration industry, and breaking itself from the jaws of International Usury.

And how fitting it is that in the week after the death of one of her greatest intellectuals and patriots, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Mother Russia has demonstrated that there's more to her soul than just vodka, Ladas and the politics of oil.

Links: Israel 'has a hand in S. Ossetia war'
Georgian Jews flee for capital (Russians = Nazis... zzz....)
Two Israeli firms said they left Georgia before fighting (Hah! Just like 9/11!)
Georgian minister tells Israel Radio: Thanks to Israeli training, we're fending off Russian military
Foreign Ministry seeks lower profile for Israel in Georgia-Russia conflict (Whoops, someone got caught!)
Livni: Israel recognises Georgia's territorial integrity (A bit rich coming from the world's only "country" with no borders...)
Georgian President Meets Jewish Leaders For Georgian-Jewish Friendship Week (2004)
'This is our Tisha B'av' - Georgia's (Jewish) Ambassdor to Israel
Miliband on South Ossetia (Grrr, pesky Russians... wait for him to bring up the Litvinenko thing all over again...)
DPNI - Russian Movement Against Illegal Immigration website
Russian news sources: RIA Novosti - ITAR-TASS

And finally, here's the clincher. American UN ambassador and arch-neocon Zalmay Khalilzad's allegations at yesterday's UN Security Council meeting? Remember Colin Powell at the UN, the "dodgy dossier" and all the death and destruction which followed?

Can you say hubris? We knew you could!

Elections are Fixed - in America!

So the Americans and some CIA-backed quango are busy telling the Russians that their election was flawed because Kremlin money was, allegedly, used to promote Putin.

Hmmm.

If Westminster money were used to promote Brown - would he get more than 60% of the popular vote?

And to what degree do the Western media promote "their men" with any real alternatives dismissed as "extremists?" If we talk about America, which media outlet even dared to oppose the War in Iraq, let alone denounce America's propping-up of Israel?

Besides which I do not think the nation that brought us the hanging chad and the pregnant chad has anything to preach to Russia or the rest of us.

In that election two Skull & Bones members (aka Bonesmen), mega-rich oligarchs stood head to head.

No uproar from the world? Where was the non-Masonic alternative? Where were the electoral monitors?

We shouldn't cry over spilt milk though. Let's look forward to the next American election, when two Masonic oligarchs will again go head to head and the people are fed their political diet via the big media outlets controlled by Zionist-Masons.

Government for the people by the people? What a load of cruddola!!!

Boris Berezovsky and the Spooks

So Boris the Oligarch (pictured) is saying Russian spooks are out to kill him.

Boris Berezovsky, whose many compatriot criminals fled to Israel, is ensconced in London.

With his links to terrorists in Chechnya and elsewhere and his embezzlement of billions, the Russians have long asked for his extradition.

No shrieks from the Neo Cons for this rich backer of terrorism to have his bank accounts frozen or to face extraordinary rendition.

Speak up Melanie Phillips we cannot hear you! What's that Richard Littlejohn? No apoplectic rage for Daily Mail readers? Pardon Lee Barnes - we didn't hear your latest rant against this terrorist backer?

And so Her Maj's government said "Tut tut Mr. Russki. No you cannot have this huge criminal!"

How delightful it was to hear the Russian State's response to the MI5 spooks request for the extradition of Andrei Lugovoi for the alleged murder of ex-KGB Spook Alexander Litvinenko, a
hired-goon of Israeli Boris.

Four Russian diplomatic staff (usually a euphemism for Embassy-based Spooks) were expelled from London you see. Russia said that if they expelled British Spooks (sorry, diplomatic staff) from Moscow, at the same ratio, for each of the refused requests for terrorists, murderers and embezzlers given refuge by Britain, they would have to expel over 60 embassy staff!

The calm and measured response from Russia was a joy to behold.

It will be interesting to see how this pans out.

Link:
Russian Ambassador Refutes Murder Claims

Question Time

I nearly fell off my chair just a few minutes ago.

Question Time started on BBC1. Some weeks I watch it - some weeks I don't, luckily tonight I thought I'd give it a whirl.

Whoop-de-do. Boris Berezovsky one of the infamous "Russian" Jewish Oligarchs, a London exile was present along with my old mate the screaming Zionist Mad Mel Phillips.

Hoorah!

Mad Mel moans about mad extremists finding sanctuary in London -- funnily enough she doesn't mean Boris with all his criminal and terrorist friends (in the former Soviet Bloc, not just in Israel!).

Three things happened in quick succession:

1. In a question about who is the biggest threat (Bush or Putin) Mad Mel said that Bush was out to save the "Free World" (ta da!) whereas our biggest threat came from - IRAN. Oh yes. Yet again, Mad Mel gets her Mossad-message across.

2. One brave woman in the audience decried the "Capitalist Oligarch's gangsterism" thus summing Boris and his pals in three words. If only she'd had the guts to add Jewish.... but you can't have everything.

3. The chairman of the Tory Party (Francis Maude) said that "well distributed property" gives freedom against State control. Clearly he is a Distributist and is aching to break away from the Tory's Big Business/Capitalist/Banking chums who buy up properties in the millions and repossess property left, right and centre.

I should watch Question Time more often...

Homosexual Degenerates

Bravo to the Russian Patriots!

How upsetting (it's getting to be quite a day!) to hear that various degenerate homosexuals (including multiple imported faeces munchers) were assaulted in Moscow by nationalists!

It was noticeable that the BBC reported that those defending the family and Russia's honour were the "extremists" -- and not the gerbilistas and fudge-packers who want "the right" to traipse their God-forsaken illness and perversion through the streets of yet another European capital city.

It is sad that nationalists, Christians and normal people in cities in Eastern Europe (e.g. Poland and Russia) and Southern Europe (e.g. Spain and Italy) make a stand against the agenda of perverts and paedophile-apologists, yet here in the UK the pooftahs march and spread their anti-Christian hate and degenerate agenda almost unopposed.

No wonder many call "the West" degenerate.

Some chanted "Moscow is not Sodom" and "No to pederasty."

After seeing images of Tatchell (who remember, has stated that buggery with nine-year-olds is acceptable) being punched in the phizog, what a slap in the face with a wet fish to then see the usual talking heads and British politicians pushing their faggot agenda, with homosexual "civil unions" and all the rest of the claptrap.

On the same day that "Archbishop" Desmond Tutu, who once cavorted with terrorists and communists, said that the Church in Africa should not be so "obsessed" with homosexual clergy.

I agree!

The church throughout the world should not be so obsessed with homosexual clergy -- because faggots in the priesthood should (in a perfect world!) be handed over to the civil authorities to be hanged. (As stated in the latest FC mag on taxation and usury, homosexuality is one of the four sins crying out to heaven for vengeance!)

Then we could move on to discussing matters of much more importance to normal people.

The whole poof agenda - as I've said before - never used to register with 99% of people, because 99% of people had no doubt it was totally wrong. You would no more discuss the "rights" of homosexuals than the argument of whether not breathing air could prolong life expectancy!

So congratulations to the Russian patriots for their fortitude and for defending the rights of Russian families, Russian children and Russia's ancient civilisation against the band of reprobates who tried to traipse their filth through Moscow's streets.

Would that politicians, prelates and patriots were as forthright in dealing with the vociferous faggot lobby and their seedy agenda in the UK.

As for the Mayor of Moscow - calling the homosexual agenda Satan's agenda - more power to his office. He has brought credit to his position and to his city.

Here's some links - go on the Sky News one for a video of Tatchell getting clobbered as he squeals "someone protect me, someone protect me." Funny how the immorally indignant faggots cry out for help from the "reactionary" police when a single Moscow patriot (pictured above) lands a punch on the uphill gardener.

These images will raise a smile right across Europe and the civilised world.

Links:
BBC Report "Eggs and punches at Russia gay march"
Tatchell's Report (worth reading - oooh nasty "fascists"! Ha ha)
Sky News (with pic of "injured" Brit faggot 'pop star')
Australian Report (Even European MPs were there to foist their degenerate agenda)
BBC Report on Euro MPs and Mayor's statement

"Moscow mayor Yury Luzhkov has called homosexuality "satanic" and says he will never allow gay rights parades in Russia's capital."