Sandy Hook Shootings, Hollywood and Israel

Interesting vid. Thanks to Griffin Watch for posting it.

I would suggest "Israeli death squads" were pre-cursored by the gangster types who killed Senator Huey Long and kidnapped the Lindbergh baby - before Israel the bandit-state existed.

Time for a Holocaust Musical? We've had Everything Else...

It was Ricky Gervais's and Stephen Merchant's series Extras which ran the episode in which it was stated that a film about the holohoax guarantees an Oscar. Now there's a truism.

Whilst an extremely well made and extremely popular film about Jesus Christ (The Passion of The Christ) was deliberately blocked by distributors and from the main Oscar awards, every big film about the holohoax, in reality war and pro-Israeli propaganda being relived time and time again for various vested interests (which Norman Finkelstein has labelled the "Holocaust Industry"), is a virtual shoe-in for an Oscar.

We have even had a Jewish film maker (Mel 'Brooks' Kaminsky) make a musical comedy (The Producers) about the Third Reich (not to mention Tarantino's "torture porn" and semi-sexual fantasies of Inglorious Basterds). So how far away are we from a musical comedy about the holocaust?

Cue the Evil German and the Avaricious Collaborators

Oh sure the usual people who decry it as "insensitive," but in reality they would love it as it would remind us all of how Jews (and no-one else?) suffered in WW2, how the deliberate industrial-scale mass extermination of Jews was a policy of the Third Reich, and bring the holohoax to a whole new level of people who might never watch The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas or The Reader.

Too low? Really? I don't think it would be too low for them - we are talking of a group of people who insist on the holohoax being a shoe-in on any historical film, whether it is sexual (The Reader), about children (...Striped Pyjamas), a musical (The Producers), violent and retributive (Inglorious...), about "good" Germans (Schinler's List), about rebellion (Defiance) or even about Science Fiction (X Men).

Every angle has been covered. On the other hand Communism killed circa 100 million people in the 20th Century, but you'd be hard-pressed to find any major film, certainly any Hollywood blockbuster or Oscar-nominee, which tackled the torture, starvation, death and gulags of Communism (be it Soviet or other).

Is it cos I is Christian?

One might surmise why this is: the victims were Christians, Communism was Jewish (as Winston Churchill pointed out). Indeed, Michael Hoffman has written how the mass murderers of Communism transformed themselves into "holocaust survivors" in one fell swoop.

Meanwhile in America various people, from ADL boss Abe Foxman to actor Marlon Brando have stated that Jews run Hollywood. The difference is that when folks like Joel Stein say it they are cheered, when gentiles like Brando or Gibson say it their careers are attacked.

"The Jews are so dominant," writes [LA Times columnist] Joel Stein, "I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies." "But lo and behold," Stein says, "even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew!"

"As a proud Jew," says Stein, "I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood."

So if the powers-that-be (aka the you-know-who's) decide we need an all musical on the holocaust - we'll get it, along with a media kerfuffle designed to make it a household subject again.

Link:

Jews on Hollywood/Media Control

Stephen Spielberg's Big Holocaust Lie- Exposed

Spielberg's The Last Days film got an Academy Award (Schindler's List of course won "best film").

Whereas The Passion of the Christ was, according to the LA Times "shut out of contention for Oscar's biggest honors."

See this wonderful documentary here

It is clear that Hollywood is fighting a (anti) Cultural war for the "holocaust industry" and against Christianity. How else can we explain the fact that "holocaust" films get lauded and given gongs, whereas one single film that tells the history of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ gets brickbats, smears, blockades and attacks by the media, the "experts" and the "hate watchers."

Many thanks to News From Atlantis blog for bringing this to the blogosphere's attention. The video contains absolute proof of the lies told by a minority of survivors as they climb aboard the 'holocaust industry' gravy train.

American Neo-Con Terrorism via Martin Sheen

The film 'Unthinkable' is worth watching.




This is one of the best scenes in it, in which the Muslim terrorist exposes American Neo-Con hypocrisy.

Of course, as we all learnt on our mum's knee, two wrongs don't make a right. Just because the Zionists/Neo Cons kill hundreds of thousands of innocents, does not make the murder of one innocent by its opponents justified.

What I find interesting is that we have had Hollywood films about Christian terrorists attacking American targets, we have had Hollywood films about Muslim terrorists attacking American targets. Yet we have yet to have had a mainstream Hollywood film about Jewish terrorists attacking American targets. Despite there being evidence of all three (state-sponsored or otherwise).

I wonder why?

War Propaganda Dehumanises Germans and Arabs

How war propaganda works.

How Germans were dehumanised - years later.

How German civilian victims were airbrushed out.

Right: How children were taught all Germans were evil.

The question is, why are we still suffering WW2 war propaganda and spin all these years later? The sole beneficiary seems to be Israel (i.e. that they can mistreat the Palestinians because of all the alleged actions of the "evil Nazis").

Fisk hints at the end of this article at the dehumanising of the enemies of current Zionist conflicts.

Indeed.

We've all seen how thousands of dead Arab men, women and children are stats, excused away by Israeli spin doctors as a legitimate result of war, whereas a handful of dead Israelis get copious media coverage and media columns on state-sponsored terrorism.

Left: 50 years on and the machinery is more sophisticated, but the war propaganda is still being churned out.

I see no difference between Commando-style comics portraying all Germans as murderers, war criminals and bayonet fodder for (American and Soviet led) democracy and the garbage that gets pumped out of Hollywood portraying all Arabs as murderers, mad Mullahs, terrorists and bullet fodder for (American and Israeli led) democracy.

Yet again we witness how the powers-that-be treat us all like sheep, to be led and cajoled into pens, where we are spoon fed propaganda and spin.

The Power of Nightmares.


Link:
Robert Fisk

Truth Not Hate: Who Owns the Fed? Who Issues the Debt?

Brother Nathanael Kapner is an unusual fellow, for not only is he convert to Christianity from Judaism, he also became a monk.

I had not heard of him before, but just a few weeks ago I read about him E Michael Jones's superb magazine 'Culture Wars' (see link to it in this blog's side panel).

In Culture Wars E Michael Jones (EMJ) reviews the Coen Brothers' film A Serious Man.

EMJ says that the film "is certainly the most anti-Jewish film Hollywood has ever produced," based as it is on the Coens' own childhood.

EMJ then juxtaposes this with the examples of 'Polish' 18th Century Jew Solomon Maimon and Brother Nathanael Kapner, both of whom also expose the Jewish authorities as EMJ says the film does:

1. The Jewish religion is false...
2. All rabbis are clueless, fatuous fools
3. All Jews are repulsive...
4. A catastrophe is looming...

And do bear in mind none of this is the work of so-called "anti-Semites," these are all people born of the Jewish race and raised in the Jewish religion.

The Zionists call such people "self-hating Jews," just as the call gentile Zionists 'worthy amongst the gentiles' and other epithets.

Basically if you support Zionist power, Zionist usury, Zionist racism, Zionist illegal nukes, Zionist terror and the anti-Christian Jewish religion (with its Kabbalistic and Talmudic roots) which acts as the justification and rationale of these bodies and actions that keep all manner of peoples in slavery and servitude; then - Jew or gentile - you are OK.

But if you have the courage to stand up and proclaim that the emperor has no clothes on, then if you are a gentile you are an "anti-Semite" and if you are Jewish you are a "self-hating Jew."

Like the Marxists, the Zionists have an answer to every nuance. And like the Marxists who screech "nazi" or "fascist" at anyone who sees through their 'paradise on earth' verbiage to justify the rule of the gulags; the Zionists can call us "anti-Semites" etc. for seeing through their terror, usury and control of America, thus the world.

I think it is time that we, as Christians, as Nationalists should recognise that there are honest, decent people like Brother Nathanael Kapner who have seen through the lies, and who are prepared to expose evil.

It makes it obvious this isn't some brain dead racism. It's not hating a people for how they were born, it is about right versus wrong, good versus evil.

We do not hate coloured people because they are born coloured, we just want to live amongst our own people as we did for millennia.

Nor do we hate Jews because they are born Jewish, we just want to control our own nations and not be involved in foreign wars, be taxed to pay usury loans, etc.

Is it a crime to wish to live in our own lands, have our own faith, have usury-free banking, stay free of foreign wars?

Is that evil? Is that hate?

I don't think so.

The evil and hate comes from those who organise usury banking, who push degeneracy through the media, who foment war and fear of war, who are behind mass movement of drugs, who attack and water down our Christian faith, who back mass coloured immigration into Europe, who promote Communism and feminism, who promote the use of torture etc. etc.

Brother Nathanael Kapner is not a "self-hating Jew" he is a Jew who has seen through centuries of Talmudic hatred and Kabbalah black magic to see the Truth.

Anyone who attacks him for that is deluded, for we all have a duty to fight what is twisted, evil and a detriment to the peoples of the world for the benefit of a small minority.

The Inglorious Hollywood Basterds: Why the BAFTA Awards & Oscar Nominations?

This video is a corker!

It shows who is undermining our Western, Christian morals and civilised ways.

Hint for Messrs Griffin, Cameron, etc.: it ain't "the muzzies."

In this video original footage and quotes are used to leave no-one in any doubt who is behind the foetid forces destroying the mindset of all generations.

Copy the link, tell your friends. This was already pulled from You Tube.

This is the truth that Tory, Lab, Lib, Nu-BNP, Green, Commie: none dare speak it, to quote the New Testament "for fear of the Jews."

Enjoy!

Finance, Usury Debt, War, Communist Terror: The International

I finally managed to see 'The International' yesterday, a film starring Clive Owen and Naomi Watts.

No film is ever going to say "it's them" and totally unravel the Masonic-Talmudic nature of international bank-usury and its stranglehold on governments, law enforcement and much more besides.

But this one comes pretty close!

It makes the case for banks bank-rolling wars in order to get the victorious side (and so nation) in debt and thus under its control.

It also links groups like the Red Brigades to the international bankers (echos of 1970s Italy) but without the logical lynch-pin of Freemasonry it does leave a bit of a hole in that sense.

But if you get the chance, get the film. It hints at the truth about wars and usury-debt, and anything that does that has to be a positive!

Idi Amin - A Zionist Plot?

I picked up a second hand copy of The Last King of Scotland the other day. Hey: 'Thrifty' is my middle name.

It's a film I'd long wished to see, but never got around to, so when I spotted it for £1 I pounced.

Of course we've all heard of Idi Amin and some of his ways, His expulsion of all Asian from Uganda in the early 70s (1974?) had a profound impact on England and the popularity of the National Front back then.

Folks around back then say Leicester (the town founded by Simon de Montfort who I understand banned Jews from it) became Asian overnight!

Anyways, with all this in mind I wanted to see this film, fiction though it is, to give me some insight into Africa in those days.

Well, if you get a chance to pick up a copy do so, because some of the background material is fascinating, esopecially the director's commentary.

As with so many despots and tinpot dictators before now, he makes it clear that Amin was backed by "the West" as an anti-Communist, at the height of the Cold War.

Or to put it better, he says that certain countries wanted to protect their business interests in Uganda (a prosperous and abundant nation).

And those nations backing a mass murderer?

America, Britain... and... er... Israel.

New World Order anyone?

1985: Hollywood's No 1 Enemy and How the Zionist Lobby Works

I took it upon myself to engage in some top level political research the other evening...

Yes, it's tough but someone has to do it as the country goes to the dogs (and that's not cockney rhyming slang, though it could be).

Thus it was I sat tippety tappetying (!) on my laptop, watching "Back to the Future."

Ah! The memories came flooding back. The funny clothes, the awful hairstyles, the dated music and clichéd catch phrases. Yes, 1985 was a bizarre era.

The funny thing was explaining all the intricacies of the film to the FC sprogs who weren't around back then and for whom 1985 is ancient history.

So it was at various conjunctures in the film the "heroes" are assaulted by "Libyan terrorists." Not only are they terrorists, not only are they Libyans, but they are gun-totin' Libyan terrorists!

The FC Sprogs, raised on a diet of their pater ranting and railing against the evening news connected with Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Palestine had very little notion of Libyans.

And it struck me what a bizarre world we live in.

Of course, as I tenderly explained to them, back in '85 it was the Libyans who were "enemy number one" to the Americans, Israel and the rest of the (stop laughing) free world.

Saddam was still on-side. Even Iran was being fed munitions and hardware (American/Zionist policy being Iranian/Iraqi mutually assured destruction). Lebanon was on its knees.

Despite the fact that Libya had never invaded, bombed or declared war on the USA -- or even so much as made disparaging remarks about the quality and cleanliness of its coastal waters -- here we had a Hollywood film showing, yes you remembered, gun-totin' Libyan terrorists on American soil, threatening the lives of good, solid American heroes like Michael J Fox.

Hmmm.

You see, as the FC sprogs were so blissfully unaware it was America that had bombed Libya. Some of you may recall that they even killed one of the children of the Libyan leader. Now imagine the uproar if a country bombed Washington DC killing one of the Obama children... Yet here we have a Hollywood film - a film written and directed by one Robert Zemeckis naturally - which paints the Libyans as the renegades, as the terrorists, as the infringers of another nation's security.

When I carefully and lovingly explained all this to the FC sprogs they saw the delightful irony in all this.

Would a Hollywood film, made by Zemeckis, Spielberg or another of that class of people, now have the Libyans spraying machine gun fire in a shopping 'mall' car park?

Or would they have the Iranians threatening American freedoms?

Take a guess.

All that is certain is that Hollywood will always take the opportunity to underline the common misunderstanding that the "Ayrabs" are the baddies.

Heaven forbid that there should ever be a film, serious, fatuous or anywhere in-between, that had the bad guys as a Mossad black ops team working in America (despite the fact that they have, and many Israelis have been arrested/expelled in and from America, including some carrying blueprints for sensitive buildings et al.

So if you haven't seen it in some time, watch Back to the Future (defensive Pork Pie at the ready of course) and look out for the "Libyan terrorists" courtesy of the American-Zionist Lobby, Hollywood, Robert Zemeckis and his confreres' attempts to twist the public consciousness.

BBC Film Critic Mark Kermode Slams Winslett's Holohoax Oscar

The BBC's very own Mark Kermode (Culture Show, Newsnight Review, Radio 5 Live's wittertainment partner with Simon Mayo et al) has slammed Kate Winslett's Oscar for the holocaust [copyright Shoa Business] film The Reader.

Right: Doctor Mark Kermode, BBC Film Critic, "ex" Communist and the man who exposed (another!) Hollywood conspiracy to promote a(nother!) Holyhoax film.

He says that Angelina Jolie's role in Unforgiven is much better, and even Winslett's role in Revolutionary Road is a better one - but (conspiracy alert!) the Studio didn't put Revolutionary Road forward for her Oscar, thus clearing the way for another holocaust [copyright ADL spooks] film to get yet another - yawn! - Oscar, adding fuel to the fire and making life imitate art (remember our posts on Winslett's Extras character and the whole Holocaust Film = Guaranteed Oscar speech).

Kermode has no reason to lie. In other film reviews (The Boy in Striped Pyjamas most recently) he has stated the importance of Holocaust [copyright Ms. Janner's Paedo-Emporium] films.

Doctor Kermode was a Young Communist and sees nothing wrong with the dystopian reality of a diet of force-fed holocaust [copyright Madoff's Billions] films whilst we are denied any meaningful or big budget films on the Soviet mass-murders in the Ukraine, or The Terror of Masonic France, or the reality of Katyn, or the mass murder of Germans by the Soviets and Americans circa 1944-46, or the horrors of the gulags (and so on ad infinitum) by a Hollywood machinery which bears the same kind of percentage of a certain people that the Soviet Commissars contained (both wioth their anti-Christian objectives: one by the trigger of a gun, one by the flick of a TV set).

As such it is nice to know that there was a 'Hollywood conspiracy' to sideline Revolutionary Road (however depressing/turgid it was) to try and make The Reader a shoe-in for a Winslett Oscar.

Let "the good doctor" pick the bones out of that one!

Holocaust Film = Guaranteed Oscar

Life imitates art.

Who's Profiting From the Holocaust?

THE HOLOCAUST PROFITEERS!

What???

The Reader up for lots of Oscars, including best film, best director and best leading actress!

Right: Why don't they just go the whole hog and have a special Oscar for Best-Holocaust-Promotional Film?

Kate Winslett widely tipped as a front-runner for her first ever Oscar!

It seems making Holocaust films really does pay off!

Yet again we have to wonder if Kate Winslett's character in the BBC series 'Extras' was prophetic when she said if you make a holocaust film you are guaranteed an Oscar!

But, dear much-maligned and over-worked reader, let us step back for a moment and address the bigger issues.

Ready? Cup of tea and a biccie to hand?

OK, let's do it:

Scenario 1:
The Holocaust happened and 6 million Jews dies in German gas chambers.

If you believe in the Holocaust as presented by Hollywood, officially sanctioned (some say 'court') historians, the Zionist lobby and Israel then why is it acceptable for so many people to gilt-edge their careers by making holocaust materials?

I believe this is roughly the line taken by Norman Finkelstein in his book The Holocaust Industry wherein he outlines the millions/billions made by Israel and creamed-off by professional hucksters.

Finkelstein states that much of the money raised (coerced, threatened, bullied) from government, industry, banks as well as via Hollywood and other professional Holocaust profiteers doesn't even find its way to the Jewish families who did lose relatives in the war.

Remember we are not talking about the Millions - always a capital M! - of Russians, Poles or Germans murdered, killed, displaced (the latter included the many millions as Russia, the Ukraine, Poland, Germany etc. were moved westwards by a Communist Terror State) and dare I mention the countless Poles killed in 1939/40 and in 1944/45 onwards by the Bolshevik murder machine, fearful of a resurgent/nationalist Poland? The murdered included many of the Polish resistance and army that fought the Germans in occupied Poland.

There has never been reparations for those killed or dispossessed of land and property in 1944/45, something bizarre when you think we were told we were going to war for Poland, only to see Poland delivered into slavery and oppression. This lack of interest in their plight must bemuse and annoy Poles.

So it strikes me that if you believe that 6 Million Jews died in WW2 in gas chambers (regardless of the others Killed by Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia or even by the RAF/USAAF terror raids) it must make you stop and think that so many people are profiting from a people's misery.

Furthermore, if the Holocaust is constantly promoted in films and awarded in ceremonies, mentioned in parliaments, debating it banned in some countries, used to excuse Israeli excesses and so on: it adds fuel to the fire because it gives "anti-semites" the 'proof' they need to show there is some kind of 'conspiracy' involving governments, the media, Hollywood etc.

There is also an addendum here. Even if you are Jewish, Communist, banker or committed war veteran: you have to wonder why the actions of Germany in WW2 are used to excuse actions against Arabs in and around Palestine who played no role at all in 'the Holocaust.'

Scenario 2:
The Holocaust didn't happen and there were no German gas chambers.

Then what needs to be said?

We have a huge machine constantly pushing the holyhoax whilst consistently ignoring the suffering of other peoples (allies or axis). We have a machinery which seeks to make as much money and garner as many awards as possible to ensure the 'holyhoax' remains the 'suffering par excellence' - to put other massacres and atrocities in the shade (even wiping out nations, like Armenia, or the organised murder of 30 million plus, like the Ukraine).

It is a machine which, perversely, is used to give a backdrop and hence a green light to Israeli illegality (WMDs and bombing other countries), ethnic cleansing, torture, concentration camps and massacres committed against civilians.

Quite what the Arabs must feel to see their dead men, women and children "excused" by the actions or non-actions of Europeans 60 years ago, and if you are a Palestinian who believes the Holocaust is a huge hoax, how much more embittered would you be?

The idea that there is this huge machine used to make billions, used to excuse Israel and its excesses, and milked for all it is worth by historians, actors, directors, politicians, charities and more is sickening.

It really is 'the holocaust industry' in every sense and despite everything else going on in the world, the industrialists involved in this con, this hidden tax, have no intention of letting up the pressure.

Conclusion:

Whichever side of the debate you find yourself on, Kate Winslett's Oscar nomination stinks. Actors and actresses are milking past events (one in particular) to get tacky awards and bolster their careers.

As time goes by the overt promotion of the holocaust, especially when there is other suffering in the world (and particularly when it is used to excuse that suffering!) will make people either holocaust-weary, or start to question why this one single event should over-ride all others involving the mass murder of Christians, Muslims, Slavs, Arabs, Africans etc.

It might even begin to smack of some kind of inverted 'racism' wherein the suffering of others before, during and after WW2 is deemed of negligible importance.

Perhaps if Kate Winslett's awards hasten that day then they may be no bad thing!

Links:

Harvey Weinstein pushed The Reader into the Oscars
Will Kate Finally Get Her Oscar?
FC on Winslett's "Holocaust-Oscar" Quote

Valkyrie: Lessons from Another Anti-Nazi Film

You might be shocked, dear reader, but I actually opened my wallet today.

Oh yes.

I had to bust the padlock off, it was so rusted (plus I'd forgotten the code of the safe buried in the garden which held the keys).

The King on my paper money blinked at seeing daylight for the first time in decades.

The sheer volume of moths that burst out was like something off a vampire film.

If you heard a loud screech circa 11am (like rusted hinges and ancient leather being forced open), now you know what it was.

So I've painted the picture.

Talk of this single event ending the "credit crunch" and the recession are said to be unfounded.

So why, you may ask (being an astute sifter of news and current events with an eye on the plutocracy and monetary reform), was my wallet opened?

Well, the elders of the FC Sprogs (as opposed to those of the protocols of Zion) had twisted my arm, blackmailed me and applied pressure via 'she who must be obeyed' to force me to take them to the cinema.

So, reluctantly I found myself at a till opposite a spotty teenager (like a Simpson's character) who insisted on taking part of what was to be a family heirloom (my money) to get some tickets to get into what they now deem to term a "theatre."

Though theatre seems a grandiose term for a setting in which, for the most part, any kind of culture is about as present for as long as a £10 note on the pavement outside a synagogue.

Mind you, they call McDonalds "restaurants" so I suppose anything is possible...

But back to the cinema, we settled down in a row and readied ourselves (by getting out the vitals we'd brought from home (see, I'm not that rich, dumb or gullible to buy any of their brightly coloured offerings from the "foyer").

Right: The queue waiting for the cinema to open was full of more fan-boys in full costume than the Lord of the Rings or Star Wars!

The film: Valkyrie, wherein a diminutive Church of Science Fiction Hollywood-luvvee plays an anti-Nazi German Staff Officer (I'm sure you've all read the reviews so I won't detain you for too long).

It's an enjoyable film and the sprogs certainly enjoyed it and we talked long and hard about it afterwards. There were bits that felt unreal (I think he mentioned closing the concentration camps in the first minute of the film) when most of those involved were probably German conservatives annoyed that the war was being lost. But hey - I don't know enough about the history of it to comment in-depth (I know! A blogger admitting ignorance: pinch yourself, it's happening daddio).

So why this long and meandering river of a preamble (leaving plenty of bizarre anecdotal ox-bow lakes in its wake!) you ask, demanding your reading time back like an irate father standing in the foyer wagging his finger at the price of hotdogs and popcorn?

Because all of us there from the FC-fold gasped in awe at the pool-bottom logo at the point when we meet the Major (or General, I can't recall) in charge of the reserve battalion responsible for taking/defending the government quarter of Berlin (a strangely bomb-crater free - for 1944 - area of Berlin) as his swims lengths. It was almost identical to the logo on the bottom of our paddling pool back at Codreanu Cottage!

So if and when you see this film (at the "theatre" or on DVD) look out for the swimming pool, and think of the sprogs and I jumping in and out of the paddling pool this coming Summer, much to horror/amusement [delete as applicable] of the neighbours.

Before I leave this most bizarre of posts to go and have a long lie down, all I will say about this film is this: as time goes by, more and more Germans during WW2 will be seen as 'normal' or 'patriots' or 'heroes' or 'cowards' or 'Christians' or maybe even just mums, dads, sons and daughters... i.e. they are and were just like us.

We can have our doubts, disagreements, differences or whatever with the German regime of 1933-45, but as the wartime hysteria and propaganda dissipates (helped by brave souls who stand up and denounce the 'gas chamber' myth) we will be left with a far more honest and open view of WW2, with the good and bad on all sides, 'warts n all.'

That can't be a bad thing.

US Airways Flight 1549, Heroism & Hollywood

WHEN IS HEROISM IGNORED?

Today on the radio a New York journalist, retelling the story of Flight 1549, the downed US Airways just moments out of La Guardia airport, made a telling comment: I can't wait for the Hollywood film.

And that's the issue isn't it?

As brave as the pilot was, as wonderful a news story as the saving of 150 lives is, why is it Hollywood would look at making a film of that, when a film about the mass murder of over a thousand people - circa a third of them children - in little more than a shanty town closed off from the outside world for circa 2 years, all murdered by a nuclear power bristling with American military hardware?

Left: A true hero. Dr Mads Gilbert, a Norwegian doctor who works in Gaza City's beleaguered Shifa Hospital. Busily trying to patch-up the shattered and burnt bodies sent to him courtesy of the Israeli army, he has become an outspoken critic of the naked and illegal Israeli aggression and their targeting of innocent civilians. This enraged the Neo Cons at Fox News, who cited Gerald Steinberg from Jerusalem, alleging Gilbert's characterization of the situation in Gaza is "in the form of incitement of hatred."

Zionists have accused Dr Gilbert of mimicking Hamas's language, just as they did when Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Vatican's Council for Justice and Peace, delivered the Vatican's toughest criticism of Israel since its offensive in the Palestinian-ruled enclave, calling Gaza a "big concentration camp." Saying someone uses "the language of Hamas" is akin to calling someone an "anti-Semite" or a "holocaust denier." All are designed to silence criticism of mass murder.

Would a film showing infants with their skin burnt off by illegally-used Israeli White Phosphorous bombs not make for intriguing viewing?

Would a film showing the heroic work of paramedics - Palestinian, Arab and European - fighting through the rubble as the Israelis fire on them be "boring?"

Or would a film showing the doctors - again, Arab and foreign volunteers - working in hospitals that are being shelled, and using almost non-existent drugs and medical supplies (as the largest depot of them is burnt to the ground by the Israelis be "dull?"

Or would a film showing the UN workers of all levels under Israeli fire in their clearly-marked convoys or shelled in their clearly marked and mapped out food and medical distribution centres be "tedious?"

Purely from the point of view of making an exciting, interesting, compelling, action-packed film with plenty of emotional moments with the suffering of families, with great heroism, with lives teetering on the edge and being saved...

Left: The very epitome of heroism. Surrounded by flames and billowing clouds of acrid smoke, a Palestinian fireman tries to put out flames in a refuge camp building, risking death from further Israeli air strikes and shelling to save as many lives and properties as he can. When he finishes his work he can look forward to scant food, the threat of instant death as he sleeps, and if he's not worrying about his family's safety surely the nightmares of burnt and dying men, women and children must haunt his very dreams.

It could be a Hollywood blockbuster with all the ingredients of geo-politics, personal suffering, death, heroism and sacrifice...

It's a winner!

The only problem for Hollywood is that the baddies of the film would be the nuclear power, American-armed bully boy of the Middle East: Zionist Israel.

Steven Spielberg made the blockbuster Munich about a handful of Israeli athletes murdered in the 70s and the Mossad group that killed those responsible (and others!).

Might we ask that an Arab (or sympathetic European) director be given the means, the backing and the freedom to make a film detailing all the above.

Right: Whilst an effort is being made, at the moment it's minnows against sharks. Not until the distribution networks are opened up to a film that deals with issues that the Hollywood grandees are uncomfortable about will a serious anti-Zionist film come about.

After all, despite the relative drama of 150 (mostly) Americans getting wet for 45 minutes, the images of badly injured Palestinian children, forced into sharing hospital beds already smeared with blood of previously badly injured (or dead!) children as the doctors cope with Israeli shelling and a truly desperate lack of medical basics would be far more cinematic and enthralling.

But no...

What am I thinking?
Left: Despite an obvious "liberal" lean (which even saw many of its denizens part of the McCarthyite anti-Communist arrests and interrogations) the Hollywood machinery has never made a Blockbuster dealing with the plight of the Palestinians and the terrorist, hateful and illegality of the tactics used by Israel. Does the racial-loyalty of the Hollywood bosses mean they leave their "liberal" credentials at the door when it comes to Israel?

I know what we need! Another Holocaust film!

After all... we really could do with another one those -- couldn't we?

Holocaust Film: Guaranteed Oscar. Life Imitates Art

A Zionist industry rewards its lap dogs.

Kate Winslett's character (pictured right) in Extras, 2005:

"How many more movies do we need about the Holocaust? I mean, we get it, it was grim. Move on! No, I'm doing it because I've noticed that if you do a film about the Holocaust? Guaranteed Oscar.”

How life imitates art!

Kate has done a film about the Holocaust and won a Golden Globe - usually a sign that the actor/actress in question is likely to win... an Oscar!

How nice to know that as Zionists murder by the hundred, Hollywood has its finger on the pulse by dishing out yet another gong to yet another "holocaust" film.

And yet another "holocaust" film has come out - well, OK, "brave Resistance Jews fighting the evil Nazis" but you get my drift. Yes, Defiance starring Daniel "James Bond" Craig, has delighted internet writers who spout things such as "the Bielskis emerged at the end of the war having saved more than 1,200 Jews."

Forget that Jews formed so many illegal resistance groups (hence their internment) or that if you add up all the 'saved' Jews, along with those who "survived" so-called extermination camps (seems the "ruthless nazis" weren't very well organised!) how can six million have died?

Forget the suffering, expulsion and mass murder of the Armenians, the Ukrainians and so many other European peoples - including the Germans after May 1945.

Forget the ongoing suffering, expulsions, mass murder, torture, internment and more of the Palestinian people.

Why oh why, 60 years plus do we still get these holocaust films shoved down our throats? Just a few weeks ago we had 'The Boy in Striped Pyjamas' in the cinemas. Last week we had The Diary of Anne Frank every night on prime time BBC1 (I can only assume the sections written in post-war WW2 biro pen were left in).

There's been nothing starring the evil (predominantly Jewish) Commissars of the Red Army as they killed and tortured in the Ukraine or Baltic States. Nothing about the mass murder and mass rape as the Red Army poured across Eastern Europe.

Left: Daniel Craig stars in Defiance, yet another Holocaust film to soil our cinemas whilst Israel murders so many Palestinians.

Nothing showing the suffering in the Red Cross nominated refugee city of Dresden as hundreds of thousands burnt to death on February 13th 1945.

Nothing showing the bravery of the people of 'Fortress Breslau' as they stood defiant ("Defiance" - that would be a great name for such a film!) in the face of a Red Army assault, as they held out for months, led by their Archbishop, as they fought back against Soviet Bolshevism.

And nothing, of course, showing the evil, nasty, murderous Israeli Defence Force as they mow down families and target refugee-filled UN buildings (though if the IDF reach 1200 victims of their onslaught - they currently stand at circa 900, a third of which were children - you might think Hollywood will take notice, after all they allege 1200 Jews were "saved" in the film Defiance, or would 1200 dead Palestinians not count to Hollywood?).

No, dear reader. For the indefinite future we can expect more films about the Holocaust.

It's a form of racism you see.

No suffering can compare!

No one else matters!

Countries are wiped out or overrun, people killed in the hundreds, thousands and millions... but Hollywood only sees one event in history!

To quote from Kate Winslett's character once again:

"How many more movies do we need about the Holocaust? I mean, we get it, it was grim. Move on! No, I'm doing it because I've noticed that if you do a film about the Holocaust? Guaranteed Oscar.”

Indeed Ms Winslett. Indeed.

Holocaust Denial: USA Run by Anti-Semites

Use these facts against all your Neo Con, uber-liberal, status quo, BBC-believing work colleagues, family members etc.

When American 'choppers' were shot down leading to a day or so's heavy fighting in Mogadishu, Hollywood made a (highly watchable) film, Black Hawk Down, directed by the artistically gifted but somewhat liberal and ecumenical Ridley Scott, who showed the events from a heroic American angle (no! shock horror!).

The Palestinians in Gaza have had many days of assault by a nuclear power against an enclave of 1.5 million people, the latest in 60 plus years of terrorism, forced expulsions, bulldozed homes, illegally tortured civilians etc. etc.

We look forward to the Hollywood film on this, from the Palestinian perspective of course!

Link:
Holocaust Denial

Evidence of a Satanic Plot

Today I'd like to tell you about advertising and the Anti-Christ.

For some time now my family has laughed at advertising for the Toyota Yaris. Every (s)advert we've seen has been some funky young dudes or foxy young chicks driving the Yaris (on their way to rock climbing, bungee jumping or white water rafting) which (somehow) demands the ultimate respect (sorry - respec' - to use the negroid parlance).

In actual fact these sad little box cars (which fittingly seem to come mostly in dull shades of grey and similar nondescript shades of drab) are rarely driven by anyone under the age of 50, with the majority of them owned by wee office middle management or OAPs (pensioners) doing 40mph in the middle lane of the M1.

And that is how advertising works.

The advertising execs (in their Christopher Biggins glasses and their Gordon Gekko (right) braces) try to convince us that chewing gum will bring us sex appeal, that shaving razors will make us powerful businessmen, that women going through menstruation enjoy roller skating in hot pants and that grey little box cars have "attitude" and are driven by the young and the trendy.

In the film Devil's Advocate, Hollywood tries to tell us that were Satan in the guise of a person (ably played by Al Pacino) he would be what the Americans call an attorney.

It's a convincing argument - because as the film portrays, lawyers will argue that black is white in order to win a case, regardless of the rights and wrongs.

The preponderance of liars, spinners and traitors in politics can probably be roughly equated with the high volume of party politicians with law degrees for that very reason.

There's little love lost for solicitors in America, and as our country mimics the States in becoming more litigious, solicitors here are on a downward slope, heading fast towards catching up with politicians, journalists - and the big guano pile at the centre - estate agents, in the league of least favourite professions.

However, as the advertising execs also try to convince us that black is white could it be that this profession could also be the domain of Old Nick?

Yes kids - McDonalds does healthy food! Yes you're a loser if you don't have the games consul No. 5 (because No. 4 - the one so trendy 6 months ago - is now the plaything of losers and cheapskates). Yes, rubbing a certain cream in your skin will make you (post-menopausal woman) look like the 14-year-old actress on the TV.

And on it goes... so that eventually even you might think that a young go-getter would allow themselves to be seen driving a Toyota Yaris!

So where does the Anti-Christ come into all this?

Well, in the Hollywood version Al Pacino would no doubt have a stretch limo or a Humvee (though in the film he professes to travel through city on the tube to keep in touch with real people - so he can't be a politician!) but today I saw it!

I saw the car used by the Anti-Christ (OK, maybe a bit too far... perhaps it's just been developed in preparation for his birth!).

It was a Toyota Yaris Estate!!!

A wee box car with a large boot chucked on the back. It looked awful. It looked dreadful (in the original sense). It sent a shiver down the spine. It was, in short, Satanic!

Man is not meant to drive such monstrosities!

How could we descend so far - from the beauty of Montmartre, built to last 1000 years, to this ugly squat box built to rust in 10 years?

Our only hope is that, by the evidence to hand, the Anti-Christ will be a befuddled OAP wobbling his way from one lane of traffic to the next with no idea of where he is or where he's supposed to be going!

--

p.s. I think there's a conspiracy. Seems fitting somehow. According to the official Toyota site there is no Yaris estate! Cue the eerie music! Thank God I had witnesses with me when we saw the monstrosity... or you might think I was mad! ;-)