Searchlight's Zionist Agenda

An interesting article on Searchlies, Zionism and revisionist History:

GriffinWatch Blog

Organised Atheism = War, Gulags and Torture

Atheists like to blame "organised religion" for wars when most wars have been political or even between families(or the same dynasty) for power.

Think of the Norman invaders of England who then fought endless wars with the French over land and rights in France. Both armies were Christian, but religion had nothing to do with a squabble over French lands.

Of course most wars were between standing armies. When massacres of civilians happened they tended to be the exception to the rule.

What the 20th Century proved is that when God is taken out of the equation, the blood-lust of men worsens. Unconstrained by a moral code, atheists murdered more people in the 20th Century than religions have ever been accused of! Morality in the wars fought by atheists (often fought against Christians - even in their own lands - or nations with an outward allegiance to Christianity, if not factual) was the exception to the rule.

Atheism has brought genocide and the gulag, with little hope of clemency or forgiveness. When Christian nations fought each other there was always the hope of truce, of clemency, of sanctuary, of common decency in treating prisoners and suchlike.

Of course Christians through history have not always been perfect (men being men) but take off the supposed "shackles" of Christianity and with no moral code (bar the empty human rights and equality slogans of the commissars which quickly fade) then men quickly descend to depravity, mass murder and torture (from the Ukraine to Cambodia, from Spain to China).

So the next time some Red idiot waffles on about "religious wars" ask him about the millions murdered by organised atheism, as opposed to soldiers killed in historic dynastic squabbles .

The English are: European and Always Have Been

MacCulloch in the House of Treason, Westminster

A TV programme on the English has unearthed a Truth that cannot be denied, even by the mental and emotional retards who repeat parrot fashion that "we are a nation of immigrants."

How God Made the English (presented by Prof Diarmaid MacCulloch) has run on BBC2 on Saturday nights and last week all but showed how pre-Reformation England was unified, one people, one Faith. Since the Reformation heresy multiplied, religious conflict multiplied, and England was ripped apart. MacCulloch admits that "tolerance" and multi-culti (a good thing in his mind) started with the Reformation. Even the established Anglican Church has never been unified, split between Anglo-Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical and High Church variants who are pro or anti women priests, women bishops, gay priests, gay bishops, and the liturgy is very pick n mix.

From unity and stability we have had disunity and chaos, all added to by 20th Century immigration deliberately planned to undermine and wreck even the nominal Christianity left in place.

This week we were shown info on immigration, primarily how the Celts migrated from Europe and how most English are in fact Anglo-Celts (or Britons converted/switched to  Germanic culture and kingdoms in the 4th and 5th Centuries). So it could be argued that England and Englishness is more cultural than racial. Of course this is true, as racially we are all European. The nonsense that "racial discrimination" is invoked when Anne Robinson slags off the Welsh is self-evidently ridiculous. Xenophobia perhaps. Ignorance maybe. But racist? No.

However, after discussing the waves of invaders and migrants from the Saxons to the Vikings, the Normans to the Huguenots, the presenter of the programme made an observation which is absolutely true but which nevertheless has been banished from all school lessons, text books, history programmes, political talk shows, and so on: that all the immigration into England up until circa the 1940s was European!

The English are a European people. Celts, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, Irish, French, Italians... all came. All celebrated their customs, over the years all became English; just as the Welsh, Vikings, Normans etc. who settled in Ireland were all European and became Irish.

The difference in the last 70 or so years is that mass non-European immigration has been allowed to happen, and this has destroyed vast areas of England.

England, since long before the Kingdom of England existed, until just a few decades ago was always European. It was always linked to Europe through its people, its culture, its traditions. It was always racially European.

Now the politicians have wrecked that. They have created a mess in which the English do not know what it means to be English anymore. Many English feel that vast areas, whole cities and towns, are no longer English in any meaningful sense.

What a mess the bunch of traitors in parliament have created! They have wrecked a nation, created a rootless, cultureless, lawless mess. In the process they have sought to wreck the last vestiges of Christianity and now look to uproot marriage. They won't be happy until the raw, bleeding wreckage of England is left for dead.

England was always European. Marriage was always between one man and one woman.

The politicians, in their Lodges (and one might point at the Protocols) have longed for this. The withdrawal from historic Europe, the mercantile exploitation of India and Africa, the false notion that the colonisation of England by the Third World (favoured by Marxists for the vote-factor and Capitalists for the wage-factor) is somehow justified, because (they say!) we have more in common with Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims due to a mercantile empire than our European Christian neighbours.


For our forefathers there was no need to get "hung up" on race any more than marriage, for both were as natural as sunshine and rain. Sadly, we now have a situation where the Emperors Clothes situation is being played out in front of our very eyes, and so we have to reiterate the bleeding obvious.

One of those is that the English people always have been and must always be European, racially, culturally and spiritually.

The Marranos and the Role of the Enemies of Civilisation

War propaganda and lies started way before WW2

History often gives us examples we can use to our benefit. Warnings from history, if you like, of how certain forces behave.

Put your crash helmet on. This is a bit of a rant...

The Borgias are often used as the example par excellence of Catholic corruption, treachery, gluttony, murder, lechery, greed, cronyism, nepotism and worse.

What the 'modern world' choose to forget is that the Borgias were Marranos, the "secret Jews" of Iberia* whose very scandals against Christianity (secretly continuing their Talmudic and Khabbalah wickedness) caused the Spaniards to embrace the Inquisition.

The Inquisition - which, remember could only act against professing Catholics - was used to seek out heresy in Catholicism, in particular those who continued their Talmudic ways and/or sought to undermine Catholicism out of some sort of Talmudic hatred.

As a result, historically speaking, the Reformation by-passed Spain as the Spanish church was free of corruption, hypocrisy, heresy and those who would destroy it from within.

The fifth column within Christendom published Protestant polemical works and "six million hysterical-style" works against the Inquisition, not because they were Protestant Christians, but because they hated the Catholic Church for rooting out hidden Talmudism via the Inquisition, and open Talmudism in 1492 when the Jews were expelled from Spain.

Even non-Catholics must wonder why Spain remained a bastion of Catholicism (even providing the "shock troops" of the Counter Reformation that won back Austria, Poland, Hungary, Bavaria, etc. for Catholicism) when so much else of Europe shuddered and split (even countries such as Poland, Hungary and France).

And historians must also wonder if it is sheer coincidence that the terrible example of the Borgias, the Marranos that crept in and took the Papacy via guile, treachery, blackmail and worse, gave the ammunition to those who would attack Catholicism, split Europe and bring about chaos and bloodshed for many years.

There is a lesson here for patriots of every kind.

Those who turn a blind eye to the (actual or spiritual) Marranos of today, those who let them rise to the top without questioning their loyalty or defending the Truth, deserve all they get.

In England in 1717, the Marranos of that era formed the Freemasons, who would worm their way into rich and even royal circles. They would embrace revolution, murder and intrigue across Europe to bring down countries, to help their worldview and to destroy Christianity or make it subservient to their aims.

Liars and subverters

Is nationalism today wise to Freemasonry? To Freemasons and their nefarious ways?

When nationalism starts defending "Western democracy," homosexuality, feminism, Israel etc. etc. we have to wonder whose side we are on. Have 'we' been "flipped" by the Marranos of today? Certainly there are accusations being flung around that would make it seem as though the Borgias are alive and well and living in Britain.

If the corruption, cronyism, betrayal, sexual degeneracy etc. is as bad in nationalism as many think, then these evil days will be flung back in the face of nationalists many years from now, just as the example of the Talmudic Borgias are against Catholics even today some 500 years later.

The BNP have a Uruguayan candidate for the Mayor of London with the name of Carlos Cortiglia. NW Nationalists have unearthed someone posting on the Jewish Chronicle (official Zionist paper and Mossad disinformation outlet) website using that name (here). He heaps praise on the bandit State of Israel which is no ally of the UK, has illegal nukes and continually breaks UN resolutions with impunity.

Now maybe this is a troll who's out to make the BNP candidate look bad, but given that BNP London candidates have previously put out leaflets defending Israel and saying that Jews must support the BNP, that "only the BNP" can defend Jews against 'Islamofascists' and all the rest of the Murdoch-press style editorialising, we are left (as in the case of Peter and the Wolf) of putting the evidence together and coming to one realisation.

In the 1960s Freemasonry brought about changes in the Catholic Church, just as they carried out revolution on the streets, took over more political and media circles etc. via their Frankfurt School. They were out to change society, to put Marxist ideas in place of traditional Christian ones.

Just one of their lines of attack has been to put homosexuals in positions of power, in the media, in the church and in politics. That is why the population has been brainwashed into thinking that "homosexuality is OK" when even just a few decades ago it was an unthinkable abomination.

For the church itself this "homosexualisation" resulted in the paedophile scandal, and with Masonic-liberal placemen at or near the top of the Catholic church, they wanted to find excuses for the queers and move them around, cover-up the abuse and disguise their own ineptitude and mistake in allowing the queers into the seminaries in the first place (the rules pre-60s used to be VERY harsh against any sexual proclivities).

Viva Torquemada and Swazis? Zionists at work

To expose the queer-paedos was to expose the liberalism of the church under the heretical John Paul II, whose New Age happy-clappy ecumenical hog-wash had destroyed Catholicism and emptied the pews. The enemies of the Catholic church knew what was going on, but stayed quiet. They helped the cover-up. (Today they campaign to get more queers into the church).

Then, when Benedict XVI took over, the deluge began. What had been disparate whispering and micro-scandals broke, via the enemy/controlled media, into a global tidal wave. The church was crucified by the forces of Marxian-liberalism, who were the very ones who created the situation that allowed the abuse to take place in the first instance - just as a Pope started to make some noises that the liberals did not like!

You see, the enemies of civilisation, whether it is the church, politics, business or any other sphere of civilisation, will enter within, create a scandal - then scream from the outside that there is a scandal and use it to strengthen their position, usually via weakening or destroying the institution they entered in the first place, and usually once their placemen have moved on.

This is the lesson for nationalism, whether it was the forerunners of the Zionists creating the scandals of the Borgias, of the Pinko-Marxists putting queers into the church and creating the paedophile scandals of the 70s/80s.

Nationalists need to be aware. The Zionists, Freemasons and homosexuals, the spiritual heirs of these examples that history has given us, would love to undermine and wreck nationalism (from within and without). Some would argue they already have.

In the shadow of the Fox-Werrity scandal and the Mossad-front pressure groups who poured money into the shadowy groups behind their "friendship," we have to be aware that these people work in all manner of circles and in creepy ways, using greed, sex and ego to destroy their enemies.

Nationalism is not immune.






---

* Whilst being corrupt and degenerate, the Borgia Marrano Pope Alexander VI, according to his Wikipedia entry ..."distinguished himself by his relatively benign treatment of Jews. After the 1492 expulsion of Jews from Spain, some 9,000 impoverished Iberian Jews arrived at the borders of the Papal States. Alexander welcomed them into Rome, declaring that they were "permitted to lead their life, free from interference from Christians, to continue in their own rites, to gain wealth, and to enjoy many other privileges." He similarly allowed the immigration of Jews expelled from Portugal in 1497 and from Provence in 1498.

So we can see that sexual degeneracy, liberalism and favouritism to those who embrace the Talmud ("their own rites") are the hallmarks of the fifth column against Christian civilisation - from that day to this!

Jesus Christ Mocked in Israel - are the EDL Watching?

Thanks to Griffin Watch for highlighting this first one. More follow:




Can we see this exposed on the EDL or BNP site? Note how Christians are 'evil' and how Jews rejected Christ?

This is not a neo-nazi video, or a Christian extremist video. It is Jewish!

They can spout their hatred with impunity. It is this evil mindset that infects the Masons, Marxists and the homosexual lobby.



This people demand laws protecting Judaism and Islam in Europe - yet attack our Faith in Israel! Christian Palestinians are attacked, bombed, machine-gunned and our Churches are strafed by the Israeli Army.



Yet these anti-Christian people and this anti-Christ religion is what the EDL and BNP think we should be allied to! The EDL even use the Cross whilst defend Judaism -- don't they know that Jews spit on the Cross and hate Christ?

It is Easter Sunday.

Read the account of the Crucifixion. Learn your history! Watch The Passion of the Christ. Understand why there has been a 2000 year war between Christians and Judaism, and why the latter organised and sponsored Freemasonry, Communism and the Homosexual Lobby.

It has all been about destroying Christianity.

Angels on Needles to Quantum Physics via the Bank of England

There was an interesting piece to camera in Professor Robert Bartlett's inside the Medieval Mind's episode on knowledge.

Many years ago I recall someone - who will remain nameless - who had been high up in the NF, attacking Christianity, using his rationalist viewpoint (he later outwardly and insincerely embraced Christian symbols and language to win votes).

He derided the Christians who, he said, wasted time arguing over how many angels could fit on the head of a needle.

Prof. Bartlett said they didn't. This was a Victorian construct, designed to poke fun at the Medieval world (in Whig history everything before the Reformation was dark, superstitious and ignorant).

In reality, he said even when Medieval people like St Thomas Aquinas debated about the nature of Angels, they were only doing what people such as quantum physicists do today. They use their rational thought to discuss possibilities in the world as we understand it.

I have often thought, when confronted by the likes of Stephen Hawkins on matters such as the shape of the universe or anti-matters (ha ha, just my little joke) as the nature of black holes, how much of this is pure supposition, vague guess work or at best informed gambles regarding these matters?

Should we stop their funding? Should we hold them up to ridicule? Should we stop the boffins who seem to think they can re-create "the moment after the big bang" however ridiculous it might seem?

So why do we poke fun at our medieval forebears, especially when so much Thomist scholasticism still holds water today.

I really think it's time we cast aside Whig history, which holds up as heroes Henry VIII (who it is estimated killed 72,000 people), Oliver Cromwell (who brought the usurious Jews back into Britain) and William of Orange (who set up the bankster debt nightmare misnomered 'the Bank of England' under whose yoke we still slave). And let's not mention John Dee, key advisor to Elizabeth I, alleged father of the British Empire and Satanist.

Against their record I would happily take the side of St Thomas Aquinas, regardless of the falsehood or otherwise of the Angels and needles history.

Lessons for Modern Nationalists from Sir Gawain

Sad to say Nationalism in the last few decades has been a tale of betrayal and greed, lies and selfishness.

Is it wishing for too much to hope that some form of chivalry might take root in those who fight (with their hearts and minds as opposed to shields and swords) for their nations?

If we can get nationalists to embrace honourable conduct in all things, then it may be a meaningful step in the right direction.

Some will laugh, others mock. But unless we do try and set a good example, then there is no hope. And if there is no hope, there is no future for nationalism other than to be the plaything of ne'erdowells.

Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
From Book II, Section 28 (part of)

First, he was found faultless in his five senses,
and his five fingers never failed him in any deed,
and all his faith in this world was in the five wounds
that Christ carried on the cross, as the Creed informs us.
No matter where he moved in melee or in battle
it was his fervent thought through thick or thin
that when he fought his courage came from the five joys
the high Queen of Heaven had of her child.
(And so the noble knight would never wear his shield
till her image had been painted on the inner half;
for when he saw her face his courage never failed.)
And a fifth five was found in Gawain:
bounty and brotherhood above all else;
courtesy and a clean heart (these were never crooked)
and the finest point, compassion -- these five virtues
marked him more than any man alive.

Should We Ostracise the Dead?

This is a pretty good history programme put out by the BBC, showing how the lives of the living and the dead were inextricably linked in the Medieval world:

Inside the Medieval Mind

This whole era and the beliefs of our forefathers has been pretty much whitewashed (like the Saxon, Norman and Tudor church walls which were covered in murals of the dead, judgement etc.) out of history betwixt the standardised 1066-Elizabeth I quick chapters.

The whole idea of "RIP" for the dead, comes from the belief of the dead having to undergo cleansing before they can become Saints - i.e. go to heaven, where they 'rest in peace'. So we would pray that the dead could indeed, rest in peace.

I always find it obscene today when any manner of scumbag becomes all but cannonised by the vicar/minister/priest at their funeral. Remember the funeral of Stephen Gately when the priest announced to all that a degenerate homosexual was in heaven?

And the idea that a child molester can recant on his deathbed and go instantly to heaven without having to "do time" for his crimes is not an idea of justice that I can recognise.

Anyhoo, the programme (maybe it'll be on you tube for overseas viewers) will (should!) be of interest to many, for I think the idea that we have a constant companionship with our forefathers, gives us a broader idea of history and that we shouldn't be concerned merely with our time, but conscious of the past, and mindful of the future too - what we leave to our children for them to pass on.

I believe we, as a society, nation and continent, have lost the central compass of knowing right from wrong that comes essentially from Christianity. I know many nationalists who argue that they can get their right and wrong without Christianity and some do so - and some are better than many Christians. But the fact is that without a solid, steady, guiding set of principles in matters of morality and suchlike, then we have chaos, where each person or set of people can set the agenda.

Look where we are today when the 'Pink Mafia' has asserted pressure on various governments to change laws and so it is "legal" for homosexuals to marry in all but name. And which next erroneous pressure group will hold sway? Which next whim, fancy or fad will push us into another illegal war or questionable "law" to undermine family life?

We have no standards. We have no accepted norms. We have no civilisation affirming truth. All is up for removal or erratic change according to the whim of pressure groups, media moguls and other primarily Masonic forces.

Of course we all like individual liberty, to be free, to have our own property ("the Englishman's home is his castle" had its roots in Magna Carta, a document enacted in the heart of Medieval England), to be free of government snoopers etc., but when you look at what liberalism (with a small l) has 'achieved' since the ideals of uber-liberalism were unleashed by various Masonic forces and taken up by various Marxist sects, it is no wonder that we live in a land where the traditions of the many are destroyed on the whim and demand of the few.

Even 20, 40 or 60 (never mind 200, 400 or 600) years ago our people were opposed to homosexuality, abortion on demand, mass immigration, race-mixing etc. etc. But after decades of media brain-washing and political party stitch-ups, most of us just 'accept' these evil changes for a quiet life.

GK Chesterton said that democracy ostracises the dead, and of course we all know that "democracy" is cleverly controlled by media moguls, political parties and hidden rulers so that we choose between poisons, just putting a mark on a piece of paper every 4 or 5 years.

The modern man seeks more affinity to MTV, brands of clothing, TV soap operas, facebook, and many other fads than they do to their dead kith and kin, to the ideals and norms of their forefathers.

The medieval idea that we are inextricably linked to the dead, to our forefathers is exhilarating. Far from being morbid, it exhorts us to live well and do well, that we do so in the knowledge that - like them - we will be judged for our actions and our deeds, and that we are just one more generation of our kinsfolk to file through this world, to be followed by the generation we leave behind.

It reminds of our duty, not only to do what is best because we should be mindful of doing right as opposed to wrong, but because our forefathers look on.

In today's world the itinerary seems to be based around self-fulfillment and self-interest, greed and degeneracy bring down even organisations built on mostly sound principles (one only needs to look at the history of Nationalism in the 70s, 80s, 90s and the 21st Century to see that this so).

We would do well to remember that all our forefathers thought differently and acted differently.

Maybe then we would look beyond short-term material gain, fame and the fawning words of sycophants, and fight for what is right.

Personally I believe that much that is wrong in this world, from the banking swindle, to the mass immigration that destroys whole peoples; from the millions killed in the abortuaries to the drugs epidemics in our communities -- these and much more have their roots in our loss of our Christian heritage.

Perhaps I am crying over spilt milk and we will never get those days back. But that doesn't mean we should accept them being airbrushed out of our history, nor that we should accept the evils washing over us all at an ever growing rate.

Bonfire Night: 1606's Al Qaeda and Masonic Bogeymen

Remember, remember the 5th of November...

In 1605 our very own "7/7" happened long before the advent of the United States, but Freemasonry and its antecedents were very much alive and kicking.

The printing presses of the Zionists (ever keen to spot an opportunity) were pumping out anti-Christian propaganda to be used by one side in an orchestrated civil war of Christendom (in part helping to create the Inquisition myth, the forerunner of the Holohoax).

At home Guy Fawkes and his colleagues, the conspirators of "11/5" (as it would be called today in our sycophantic Americanised way), were as much a creation of the burgeoning 'New World Order' as the much talked-about Al Qaeda today.

Both religious in outlook, both created via justified grievances with the New World Order, both helped in their arming, planning and both used to justify draconian police state measures and to entrench the regimes and bring about a 'fear factor' to make anyone who questioned the regimes, busy overturning centuries of traditions and freedoms, as 'unpatriotic.'

Two key events (organised or started by other forces - accidental and orchestrated) were blamed on these bogeymen of their day: the Great Fire of London (1666) and the Twin Towers (2001) such was/is the hysteria of the day - whipped up by much the same Masonic powers.

In 1605 the regime was no spring chicken, despite having only a few decades of its new Weltanschauung, and realised that the patriotic fervour of 1605 needed corralling.

For the next 250 years Bonfire Night/Guy Fawkes Night celebrations at which various "anti-British" effigies were burnt was an event that was organised by the state. Indeed for those 250 years it was legal prerequisite, by military law, to hold/attend such celebrations in Britain and its territories.

Kind of makes our state-organised 'Welcome Home' events to support the Zionist War in Afghanistan look muted by comparison (and please don't parrot that these are to "support the troops not the war" -- why did the politicians organise them otherwise?).

So 400 years later what have we learnt?

Precious little it would seem. Guy Fawkes and his companions are viewed somewhat romantically by many, but for many more they don't know or care, Bonfire Night being just another event on the calendar to have a beer and a night watching fireworks.

Years from now will Holocaust Day be seen in the same light? Clouded in history, but just another excuse for a special assembly in school and a day-out for local councilors? Another NWO-organised "holiday" to replace the true Holy Days of Christendom that allowed the working man of England (and his kith and kin across Europe) to freely celebrate in what was Merrie England before the New Unhappy Lords held sway?

Michaelmas, Candlemas... will soon be joined by Christmas if the Masonic Overlords and their supermarkets get their way.

In our Brave New World (Order), all will be homogenised to be equal celebrations of diversity, not allowed to impede trade (lest the Financial Times report that a day off 'costs' the country x millions).

Bonfire Night and its Elizabethan Terror, orchestration, dungeon, rack, fire and sword will be forgotten so none of us will be allowed to see the similarities (were we ever?) with today's NWO orchestrated "bogeymen" who we are told threaten democracy (the rule of elected oligarchs, place-men of Masonry).

Bonfire Night will nestle betwixt Duvali, Yom Kippur, Ramadam, Christmas, Holocaust Day, Chinese New Year, Martin Luther King Day and the 57 Variety of multi-culti (trading) days to be respected by a compliant media.

Remember, remember the 5th of November
Government orchestrated plot
For the sake of freedom from the New World Order
This should never be forgot.

Anglicans Sick of Liberalism Looking to Rome

News that a meeting of 600 Anglicans (representing many more) met to discuss moving back to the 'Church of Rome' should be welcomed.

Right: Edward the Confessor. Arguably the last Saxon King of England, a good Catholic King beloved by his people, whose piety gave him his nomenclature. The Saxons of England were an especially devout people whose Catholicism was as English as it was deeply rooted; they were nonetheless still a fiercely warrior-like people who also believed in the freedoms of the people.

Whatever we have been conditioned to think of the Catholic Church since Elizabethan and Cromwellian times, we should remember that historically the English were more Catholic than even their continental counterparts.

When the Normans invaded [1066 and all that] they found that the Saxons of England celebrated the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary*. This wasn't made a dogma of the Church for another 900 years and so the Normans suppressed it. But isn't that fascinating to know that England - often called Mary's Dowry because of the English peoples' known piety to the Mother of God - was in that sense even more Catholic than the Normans, who built so many of the breathtaking stone churches and cathedrals that still stand in so many English and Welsh cities, towns and villages.

Now don't get me wrong, I know that as an institution made up of human beings the Catholic Church is very far from being perfect. If it were perfect Jerusalem would have been Christian for the last thousand years. In more recent years it has taken up political correctness as have many others. Anti-racism in its communistic guile is there as well as many other "right on" causes.

But it is also clear to many that the Catholic Church, even in its 1960s/70s rush to "modernity" and "relevance" -- with beardy clerics wearing "call me Ted" badges -- has been a bulwark against so much that is wrong in the world.

Just imagine if the Church weren't infiltrated by Masons and the faith of the early 20th Century, with the social teaching that was embraced by movements as diverse as the Falangists, the Rexists, the Fascists etc. in a huge tidal wave that swept Europe. were still a voice for the voiceless.

One thinks of the great Cardinal Newman, himself a convert from Anglicanism, who worked with and stood up for the dock workers in East London. Or of course 'our own' G.K.Chesterton, also a convert, who embraced the social teaching of the church.

It would be almost impossible to think of nationalism today without the great influence of G.K. Chersterton. Similarly, it would be impossible to think of the rise of the myriad of anti-Communist and anti-Capitalist movements in the 30s of Europe without the great Papal encyclical of 1931, Quadragesimo Anno. Without the input of the church we would still have "nationalism" as a state-centred imperialist, reactionary, antagonistic movement with Spaniards versus the French, versus the English, versus the Germans etc. ad nauseum.

It was the Catholic Church that injected the patriotic movements of Europe with the much needed social aspect of their cause, just as it is the Catholic Church which today pushes for the belief that every soul is created in the image of God, thus to oppose a social conscience as much as to oppose a pro-life stance is simply wrong.

Nationalism owes much to the Catholic Church. To think otherwise is prejudice and to ignore the simple facts. Every single nationalist grouping (happy to acknowledge any who haven't) in England, of every type/shade, has acknowledged the huge debt owed by nationalism in the 21st Century to Chesterton and the Distributists.

So the move by many "traditionalist" Anglicans back towards Rome should, I believe, be welcomed because it acknowledges that the home of true Anglicans is in reality in the Catholic Church. The Saxons are returning to their mother Church.

Of course many will point at great wrongs in the Catholic Church, just as they did at the time of Luther, not least the terrible scandal of a tiny minority of evil paedophile priests and the cover-up organised by terrible bishops concerned more for their reputation and their station in life than their flock and their duty. One thinks immediately of America.

The same is as true today as at the time of Luther. The church does need reforming; because weak, venal, position-grabbing careerists are putting their own ideologies or betterment before Christianity.

But you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater (you don't destroy the good structure to rid a few bad practices). The corrupt parts of the Catholic Church needed a kick up the breeches in the 16th Century, and eventually the Church organised the Council of Trent which codified much, organised the education of priests etc. etc.

The same is needed today. A return to the days when homosexuality was an outright sin** (and homosexuals banned from seminaries) must be sought for the sake of the Church, for the converts, for society and for the sanity of a Europe entering a Masonic EU controlled phase of history (with the "rights" of homosexuality enshrined in their Masonic laws).

The last Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster -- the man who scandalously took the war criminal Tony Blair into the Catholic Church without a public recantation of his pro-abortion, pro-homosexual regime/views and his role in an illegal, unjust war -- springs to mind as a typical cleric of higher office who needs ostracising/educating.

So the situation (as ever throughout history) is never straightforward.

In the bigger picture we should welcome an invigorated, English, Traditional, parish-based Catholicism. It would see many local parishes, with their traditional strong Norman and Saxon altars return to the Mass (remember that the founder of the Church of England, Henry VIII, believed in the sanctity of the Mass, of transubstantiation and of the sacraments of the church) as it was in England for hundreds of years (and in Wales for a thousand plus years). It will also remind people that Christianity was, is and always will be intrinsically for the family and against all the liberalising, politically correct trends.

It will also remind everyone, from Nick Griffin to Nick Cohen, from Gordon Brown to Elton John, that to be English is to be Christian, and that isn't a 500 year old thing or born of Cromwell, but that it goes back to the Saxon "Dark Ages," to the Roman Empire and to the days we remember when we sing "did those feet in ancient times, walk upon England's mountains green".

The influx of people who question liberalism in religion may even help the Catholic Church clear out its own stables. After all a Church (as with any structure) which is seen as hypocritical in any way, and especially in matters such as the innocence of the children (better someone never have been born than to harm one of my little ones, to paraphrase Christ), cannot sincerely offer any answers to a hypocritical society and system.

The fact that the Catholic Church has retained, despite the efforts of internal and external Masons, homosexuals, humanists etc. some semblance of its age-old stance and belief-system has meant that the Anglicans who have been betrayed by a touchy-feely church with its vomit-inducing "anything goes" services, trendy vicars, homosexual-tolerant, morally ambivalent have somewhere to turn to, which will bring about a unity of Faith long sought for for 500 years.

Those who would have had the Catholic Church give up its ancient practices, structure, papacy, liturgy, dogmas etc. in totalis would have left an emaciated Anglican-like church which would have left nowhere for distraught Anglicans to turn to!

Not all is fine and dandy in the Catholic Church, but at least it is still standing firm on matters of morality in the public domain, despite its pitiful failings in a few tragic (but nonetheless devastating) cases. How much stronger would be its case for reunion with Rome if it kept its house spotlessly clean and kept a strong, determined line on defrocking degenerate priests and insisting on each one being immediately (albeit fairly) tried for their crimes?

You cannot disassociate public policy from private behaviour: by their fruits shall ye know them.

Therein lies the lesson for us all: especially for the nationalist movement.


Link:
QUADRAGESIMO ANNO




*Read William the Conqueror by Hilaire Belloc.
**Indeed, traditionally in the Catholic Church homosexuality is one of 'the four sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance.' Surely it is difficult to find a more dreadful form of sin! The full list is:

• The voluntary murder (Genesis 4:10)
• The sin of impurity against nature - sodomy (Genesis 18:20)
• Taking advantage of the poor (Exodus 2:23)
• Defrauding the workingman of his wages (James 5:4)

Hitler DID Shake Hands with Jesse Owens!

Another ZIONIST lie laid to rest.

Funnily enough this particular lie is still being displayed in the Imperial war Museum in London.

On a recent visit there I told my two young companions and a number of people nearby that it was a lie, and that Hitler had shook hands with Owens.

Now the truth is out there.

The Imperial War Museum should be told to remove the lie from the "inter war" display...

Maybe their "holocaust" exhibition will be next... ;-)

No doubt the board running the 2012 Olympics will put this important historical fact in their brochures etc... after all, if Jesse Owens was a fan of Hitler, then there may yet be hope for multi-culti London!

Link:
Hitler and Owens

Sir Martin Gilbert: Court Historian Chosen to Whitewash Iraq War?

Martin Gilbert is what is known as a "court historian."

He is the state's preferred choice.

Left: Martin Gilbert's panoply (in every sense of the word!) of books have made him a lot of money and given him great prestige from a war-mongering and corrupt state. He is the chosen historian of all Zionist politicians. This is just one of his many books on the holocaust (what an unhealthy obsession!). All roads lead to Tel Aviv!

His history of Israel -- quelle surprise! -- is biased. His book 'The Holocaust' is meant to be a definitive tome. Meanwhile his Churchill history is in stark contrast to the ugly truth.

The knighted Gilbert is reaping his reward for years of service to a Zionist state.

Some point to the fact that unlike expelled Palestinians, who have been forced out of their homes and off their land, Gilbert has the "Right of Return" to 'Israel.'

Now he sits on the official British government Inquiry into the Iraq War.

What a bloody farce - by that I mean the inquiry, not the lies before, nor the execution of the war.

Blair and Bush may be hoping that a few hand-picked ninnies and marionettes will airbrush out the known lies...

I can only hope public clamour and a few good men in the right circles will ensure some degree (!) of truth comes out about the Zionist, butchering and false nature of the "intelligence" presented, the war itself and the slice-up of Iraq for the various vested interests.

Mr. Gilbert notwithstanding.

Time will tell.


Link:
Gilbert's Israeli Book
Gilbert's Falsification of History

Clash of Civilisations: 2000 Years of Anti-Christian Hatred

I just began reading a book entitled The Stripping of the Altars by Cambridge Professor Eamon Duffy after reading his more recent book on the reign of Mary Tudor (both published by Yale University Press).

Right: Prof Duffy's book on the grass roots faith of the people of England.

The book deals with the grass roots religion of the English people from circa 1400 to 1580, written to show that the changes imposed under Henry VIII, but primarily under the reign of Edward VI, were not universally embraced, moreover they were piecemeal and grudgingly enforced, and so easily reverted under the reign of Mary Tudor (e.g. removed Rood screens secretly stored and simply replaced).

That gives you some background anyway.

In the preface to the second edition Duffy answers some of his critics in relation to the mater of the Lollards in the early 15th Century. He answers that the Lollards had little effect on the population as a whole. In fact, the Lollards are an interesting pointer to how sometimes the path to hell is paved with good intentions, because some who justly called for a return to charitable acts and godly priests became twisted enough to attack the sacraments of the Church.

Some of their fellow early Lollards even turned on them and attacked them for this. It kind of makes you think of the Reformation itself, with many people fed up of genuine corruption in the Church, but the assault on Churches, the pulling down of statues etc. speaks of a far more suspect motive.

As such Duffy discusses those in the 15th Century who were attacking the very idea of the sacraments, especially of Christ's body, blood, soul and divinity being present in the Eucharist.

He writes of a Mid-15th Century play called the Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which he thinks was written in Suffolk. Here he tries to show how short-lived and shallow was 'Lollardy' because by this time the play, which could have been used to sucker-punch the Lollards and "contemporary heresy" makes no mention of them at all.

As Duffy himself says:

"The anti-sacramentalists of the play are Jews."

And that, I think, is the nub of the reality.

It was well to question corruption in the church - as many did and do. This finally resulted in the Counter Reformation (and if you get the chance, for a startling account of the theological and political nature of it and its ramifications for Europe, read The Counter Reformation 1550 - 1600 by B.J. Kidd published by SPCK, the London-based Anglican in-house publisher).

The force which always pushed against the Church as it existed and the sacraments were, surprise surprise, the Jews.

Little surprise there as the Crucifixion of Christ was the act of their religious leaders 2000 years ago, and as any genuine Christian or Jew will say the Church and Christians of the 15th Century believed with its heart and soul that the Sacramental nature of the Mass, the central pillar of daily and weekly life for most folk, was a re-enactment of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion.

In short there were Altars in every Church in every city, town and village because you need an Altar for a Sacrifice; and the vast majority of English (and European) people believed in the Sacrificial nature of the Mass.

Those opposed to this were the Jews, who rejected Christ and His Church.

This is the lesson for all history.

Who publishes the movies that blaspheme and mock our Christian heritage? Who runs the banks that enslave our people, business and government in illegal anti-Christian usury? Who bankrolled and organised Communism that ushered dozens upon dozens of millions of Christians to their deaths in gulags and via enforced starvation? Who are disproportionally present in so many "Western" governments - governments that betray our people, enslave us, destroy ancient freedoms and bring in multi-culti anti-religion?

Who promoted Luther and his works to attack the Church, only to reject even his watered-down Christianity (much to his chagrin after all their help and anti-Papal diatribes he thought he would convert them all) and so cause him to retaliate by writing 'The Jews and their Lies?'

What of the Jewish printing presses in places such as Amsterdam which published tracts attacking the Inquisition in Spain?

This was the Church's attempt to overturn heresy in its own ranks (note: nobody outside the Church could be brought in front of it) by "conversos" - Jews who claimed to have converted to Christianity yet continued a form of "Crypto-Judiac" religion. And yet the Jewish printing preses churned out material purporting to attack the Church for some kind of "genocide" of Jews.

Indeed, so many people (for the right and wrong reasons!) point to the Spanish Inquisition as the forerunner to the Shoa/Holohoax; and the roll of a controlled media in both events cannot be overstated.

As one nationalist wrote in his article on 'the Sacred Nature of the Six Million' the attempt in more recent decades has been to remove the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as the centre of world history, the point in time that all peoples looked to, with the "sacrifice" of the "six million" in WW2.

Some folks think when the Jews rejected Christ they were looking for a new militaristic messiah that would bring their world empire (er... New World Order), with the Jews as the "chosen people" at the head of it.

Others think that the Jewish people, or their religious/political leaders, now consider themselves to be a kind of messiah (a form of Race worship), with a duty to control the world, bring "enlightenment" to the world (hence the role of Freemasonry etc.) and throw off the shackles of Christian "superstition."

Right: A satire on the French Revolution, yet in The Terror of the Masonic French Revolution, there was a real Talmudic bloodlust to murder all those who adhered to Christianity and Tradition. The hatred of Christianity saw a naked whore enthroned in a Cathedral as the goddess Reason, and the Eiffel Tower constructed on consecrated Hosts, to show the Masonic "victory" over Christ.

They founded Freemasonry as a "gentile Judaism" to bring about revolutions and amoral politrickery, and even Freemasons have admitted that their religion is Talmudic and Luciferian.

They founded Communism to bring about a revolution against Christianity and to establish their Utopian vision (of gulags and repression). Communists and Jews have admitted that Communism was Jewish.

They even founded Islam some 1400 years ago as a means to stop Christianity spreading eastwards to their new lands in the Khazaria region, to provide a buffer-zone.

Anyhoo, the issue here is that whether we look at Palestine at the time of Christ, 7th Century Arabia, Mid 15th Century England, 17th Century Spain, 18th Century France, 20th Century Russia, 21st Century America or so many other times and nations, the "Clash of Civilisations" is clear.

It has been a fight ongoing for 2000 years.

If we value our Christian heritage then we have to know our history, we have to know who our enemy is, and why they hate us and Christianity.

Unless we know all this, any resistance, any fight for national Independence is meaningless, because our historical enemy will merely take it and pervert it to their own ends.

If Nationalism becomes Zionist then it has lost before it has even got anywhere.

Huge Range of Flags Just £5 each

Remember that we have a huge range of 100s of flags, many of them rare, including nationalist and military designs, historic and heraldic designs, football and sporting designs.

With postage fixed at just £1 per order there's never been a better time to grab a load of flags, whether it's for your (and friends') personal use, an activity, a rally, a camp, a community event etc. etc.

Right: Our 18" x 12" hand held RAF flag (£2.99).

So from the Celtic Cross to Richard the Lionheart's Three Lions, from the Confederate Battle Flag to the German Imperial Navy Iron Cross, from the Household Cavalry to Rhodesia: there's a flag for everyone!

Left: The flag of St Edmund of Suffolk, the historic Saxon Patron Saint of England.

And don't miss our hand held and table-top flags too!

Fill yer boots!

Link:
FC Flags

Last Week's Quote: Bishop Williamson on 1694 & the Banks

"In economics, the founding of the Bank of England in 1694 was a major step on the way towards modern finance: central banks taking control of the money supply and therefore of the real government of the nations, by progressively replacing real deposits as the foundation of credit with fictitious credit as the foundation of "deposits"."

Bishop Richard Williamson
March 28, 2009

Ave Mussolini!

Llywelyn the Last's Celtic Cross Battle Flag

According to Wikipedia:

Banner known as Y Groes Nawdd or "The Cross of Neith" said to have been the battle flag of Llywelyn the Last.

Llywelyn the Last - as the name suggests - is still held by many in Wales to be the last legitimate Prince of Wales - killed in 1282. The current holder, of the House of Saxe-Coburg, is not said to hold the title legitimately.


Link:
Wikipedia Welsh Flags
Owain Glyndwr's Flag

Good Friday: Do Not Hide "For Fear of the Jews"

Good Friday: Do Not Hide "For Fear of the Jews"

As he goes to Church this Good Friday, the leader of the "Christian" BNP will be remembering the Crucifixion and Passion of Jesus Christ.

Right: The "free world" is led by Zionists and our entire foreign policy - including the meaningless deaths of servicemen - is dictated by Zionism. Obama (Austrians speak Austrian - is he NuBush?) is pushing to get more European Armies into Afghanistan to prop up another useless Zionist War that America started. Unless politicians acknowledge that international geopolitics is imbued with Zionism, that Usury banking is almost entirely Judaic and that Sanhedrin-style groups like the Bilderbergers, CFR, Skull & Bones, AIPAC, ADL etc. 'run the show' through intimidation, power, bribery and coercion - then there can be no breaking free. Certainly whipping up the 'Power of Nightmares' over a side show (Jihadis) which has been orchestrated for the benefit of Israel and the Zionist Lobby will do nothing to reveal the Truth, but rather condemns those who spread "war and the rumour of war"

Over the last few years there has been a bit of friction between what some observers term "the Western Church" or "the Latin Church" and organised Jewry over Good Friday.

At one stage the Church dropped the prayer for Jews at Good Friday.

How bizarre! For how could it be "hateful" to pray for someone?

The point was that the Jews (read top Zionists, Masonic groups et al) didn't want reminding that they rejected Christ and that the Jewish authorities organised the Romans and the crowds so that Christ would be crucified, mistakenly thinking that this would be an end of the matter!

The whole issue of Good Friday is so "hateful" to the Jewish authorities that a mini-industry has sprung up to ensure that the facts of the day are re-written, besmirched or outright attacked.

We saw this when Mel Gibson's powerful film The Passion of the Christ came out a few years back.

One of the most powerful and innovative films of a generation, it was attacked by groups such as the (wholly Masonic and Zionist) ADL for being "hateful" because it kept strictly to Biblical history and the accounts of the Saints of the suffering of Jesus Christ.

The very nature of Good Friday is that it reminds Christians and Jews that Judaism was abrogated by Christ's sacrifice on Calvary, and the false religion of Phariseeism (made more evil and anti-God through the Talmud) with its hatred of Christ is what passes for Judaism today.

As writers and academics have pointed out, this Pharaseeism has nothing to do with the Old Testament, with its bizarre admixture of Kabbalism, reincarnation and all manner of bizarre customs and beliefs, no matter that the birth of Christ and His foundation of His Church on the "rock" of St Peter made Judaism null and void.

Good Friday and Holy Week are the most important festivals of the calendar for Christians, even more so than Christmas because if it was to this moment that all ancient history led, and from this point that all modern history started.

The fact that the enemies of Christ see Good Friday as "hateful" speaks volumes, because it reminds them and us exactly who crucified Christ and why they crucified him.

The Sanhedrin, the Jewish authorities who tried Christ, mocked Him for saying that He would destroy the Temple and rebuild it in three days, thinking he meant their building in Jerusalem. They didn't realise that Christ was the new temple, and that He was referring to His own imminent death and Resurrection.

Of course the Marxists (remember who founded Marxism) still pour scorn on the Resurrection too, because without that Good Friday is "just another death" and not Deicide.

So as the leader of the party who claims to be the sole defender of Christianity in Britain goes to his Easter services today and Sunday, he would do well to remember who organised the crucifixion, who demands that prayers should be tailored to airbrush "the inconvenient truth," and who continues to pour hatred on Christ's Passion and Resurrection.

A hint to Mr. Griffin: it ain't the "muzzies."

Meanwhile to those who see the "sole enemy" as Islam (forgetting who invented Islam as a buffer to stop the spread of Christianity Eastwards towards the Tartar lands and Khazaria) who will probably be at the new cathedrals today, the "shopping malls" we see that even their humanist, liberal bleating on the "war on terror" are falling apart.

It now appears that "we" invaded Afghanistan to promote women's rights! Strange that... when women had more rights (to education etc.) under Saddam Hussein in Iraq than they do in many parts of the "new democratic Iraq." Let's not even mention the rights of Christians who enjoyed far more freedoms in Saddam's Iraq.

The Masonic enemy of freedom and Truth worldwide doesn't care what excuses it makes to foment wars against those whom Israel views as a threat, just as the Sanhedrin didn't care what false witnesses and lies it used against Jesus Christ on Good Friday all those years ago (when they used the Roman Army to do their dirty work as they use the American Army today!).

On Good Friday those of us who profess to be Christian (which seems to include the BNP, paedophiles, money-grubbing, Zionism and orgies aside!) would do well to remember who Crucified Jesus Christ and why.

Believe it or not but they are facts that resonate through the centuries and the same Quo Bono applies today.

And just like the apostles, politicians will not state the Truth about Good Friday and the ongoing rejection of Christ by the Jewish authorities, and the subversion of Christian Europe by Zionists, Freemasons and Marxists: "Yet no man spoke openly of him, for fear of the Jews." (John 7:13)



Link:
Jews in Germany Protest at 'new' watered-down Good Friday Prayer
Newspaper editor responds to Jewish threats and defends watered-down prayer
The Passion of the Christ - Official Site

Below: The American media reports on reactions of Gibson's film.... Note the response of the NY Times and a Jewish spokesman, compared to those coming out from the film.

Dydh Sen Pyran Da - 2009 - Happy St Piran's Day

CORNWALL'S PATRON SAINT'S DAY.

A very happy St Piran's Day to all our Cornish readers and those of Cornish descent.

Right: St Piran. I was tempted to show solidarity with the BNP by putting in a Polish Saint...

Interest in the Cornish culture, language and history is growing in that proud Celtic Nation, and long may it continue to do so!

Link:
Happy St Piran's Day

Last Week's Quote: Oswald Mosley on Open Debate

"Let all things be discussed, and let truth prevail."

Sir Oswald Mosley,
The European journal,
March 1953.


56 years on: how very apt for today's world where war criminals get rewards, sinecures and baubles; yet those who merely have an opinion or want to discuss the details of history are hounded out of countries!

As some coloured gentlemen were want to say: No Justice! No Peace!