Visit the FC Shop!
Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Israel: Exporting Terrorism

Mossad killed Iranian scientist, Der Spiegel reports
August 2, 2011
JERUSALEM (JTA) -- Israel is responsible for the assassination last week of an Iranian nuclear scientist, the German newspaper Der Spiegel reported.
The assassination of Darioush Rezaei is the first "serious action" taken by new Mossad chief Tamir Pardo, an unnamed Israeli source told the news outlet, according to an article published on the newspaper's website Tuesday.
Rezaei, who worked at a nuclear research center in northern Tehran, is the third Iranian nuclear physicist who has been assassinated in the past 20 months.
The killings are part of a campaign to sabotage, or at least slow down, Iran's nuclear program, Der Spiegel reported, citing unnamed sources in Israeli intelligence.
The report also cited its military source as saying that the calls for bombing Iran are increasing, especially from Israeli Air Force officers.
Iranian media first identified the victim of last week's assassination as Rezaei, who worked on the development of switches for a nuclear bomb, then amended its identification to name graduate student Dariush Rezaeinejad. Der Spiegel asserts that the victim was indeed Rezaei, who has not been seen since the attack.
Two attackers shot Rezaei in the throat, the magazine said, before fleeing on a motorcycle.

Link:

Monday, 1 August 2011

Zionists Blame Anti-Zionist Utoya Labour Youth for their own Deaths! Pet Media Keep Quiet

A Conspiracy by the Zionists!!! Norway = Nazis
The Zionists/Neo Cons are now blaming the Norwegian Labour Party youth for their own deaths!

Yes, just like the Palestinians are to blame for having their land stolen, for having their wells poisoned, for being cut off from their water supplies, for being killed by the thousand...

They are now saying that the Norwegian Labour Party youth decided to support the Palestinians (or "Hamas terrorists" in their lingo) so they (basically!) got what they deserved.

Don't believe me? Go see for yourself: Evil Zionism...

Oh the evil! They flew Palestinian flags even. Death to them!

Can you believe it? The Zionists even say the old Swastika is now the new Norway flag. And to them because the anti-Zionist Labour Party is in power in Norway and already said it would recognise the Palestinian State, they become a "legitimate target" for another false flag operation which (like Bologna, Carpentras etc.) can be blamed on "right wing extremists."

So what does "our" mass media make of this? Jewish and Zionist extremists gloating over the deaths of innocents? Is it on the front pages? or even the inside pages?Any columnists brave enough?

Erm... no.

Controlled media? Conspiracy? You bet!

And this, dear reader, is why the BNP, EDL, and all the other civic patriot (read: blacks are british -- all lower case, we don't want to frighten anyone) groups were playing a dangerous game when they started making Israel-friendly noises, when they started grubbing for Jewish votes, and cultivating a certain breed of media columnists.

You get friendly with Israel and you get your fingers burnt! Look at America - endless wars, in debt up to the gills, state secrets stolen by Zionist spy-rings, the USS Liberty incident (look it up!), and Israel probably even has a section of its illegally held nukes in the Negev Dessert pointing at its ally!

Israel is a terrorist state. It will strike out at its enemies, and its friends - by fair means or foul. It will use terror, subterfuge, blackmail, corruption - you name it. The Norwegians are just the latest in a long line of victims of Zionist terror for daring to oppose Israeli terrorism.

If we really want to show solidarity with the Norwegians (as the mass media suggests we should) then we should oppose Israel and the Zionist agenda with every fibre of our being.

Yet our Zionist-led media is already twisting events, so we are lied to and half-truths are spun, so that to show solidarity we're all supposed to hug an immigrant, and celebrate the (Zionist imposed) race laws which enforce "equality."

Talk about not seeing the wood for the trees!

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Anders Behring Breivik Norwegian "Christian Extremist" is a Freemason: Shut Down the Lodges

Why hasn't the media mentioned this?

Why aren't the Lodges in Norway and overseas being investigated?

How can a man who is involved in anti-Christian Freemasonry, who named his phantom organisation on the Templars - a group suppressed by the Church and whose occult mythology the Masons have styled themselves on, be labelled a Christian?

How can a man who criticised the Flemish Nationalists (who are sickeningly pro-Israel) for not being pro-homosexual enough be considered Christian?

Let us see this picture shown on the news! Let us see the Lodges spied on. Let us see policemen and politicians being told that they cannot be members of the secretive Lodges.

Wasn't the Dunblane mass murderer also a Freemason? Weren't the Bologna killers members of the P2 Masonic Lodge?

How many more Masonic terror outrages before action is taken?



P.S. No doubt the National Secular Society and all its hangers-on will have been whooping up the idea of a "Christian fundamentalist" killing a lot of children/teenagers. That Mr Brievik describes himself as an atheist Darwinian (see link below) will no doubt make them celebrate this "great act" of Darwinian action (survival of the fittest) - or will they cover this up and feebly cling to mass media liberal headlines about his "Christianity?" I wonder...

Link:
Breaking News Oslo terrorist a Mason

Sunday, 6 March 2011

American Neo-Con Terrorism via Martin Sheen

The film 'Unthinkable' is worth watching.




This is one of the best scenes in it, in which the Muslim terrorist exposes American Neo-Con hypocrisy.

Of course, as we all learnt on our mum's knee, two wrongs don't make a right. Just because the Zionists/Neo Cons kill hundreds of thousands of innocents, does not make the murder of one innocent by its opponents justified.

What I find interesting is that we have had Hollywood films about Christian terrorists attacking American targets, we have had Hollywood films about Muslim terrorists attacking American targets. Yet we have yet to have had a mainstream Hollywood film about Jewish terrorists attacking American targets. Despite there being evidence of all three (state-sponsored or otherwise).

I wonder why?

Saturday, 5 March 2011

Why do the Media and Politicians Lie About the Threats we Face?


Successive governments of every hue have told us that the protection of our citizens is number one priority.

That is why, we are informed, that it was so vital that we take part in the newspeak "War on Terror."

Right: "Can we watch multi-culti, pro-homosexual Eastenders after the news Dad?"

Never mind that it could be argued that our taking on the Israeli-American foreign policy puts more of our people (here and especially overseas) in peril, let us look more closely at who our people need protection from.

1. Who is behind the terror attacks?

There is eye-witness evidence that Israeli Mossad agents brought down the twin towers and were "on the ground" in NYC when "911" took place. Eye-witnesses saw Israelis with a hire-van celebrating. The same hire-van was stopped by police whose explosive sniffer-dogs went haywire by the tunnel linking NYC with New Jersey. A story even leaked of a foiled terror attack on the NYC-NJ tunnel on the same day, before being silenced. The arrested Israelis were released without charge.

Or even without this proof, we can ask ourselves Quid Pro Quo. Who has the most to gain from "911" - a CIA established extremist Islamic group whose bases were destroyed? Or the Israeli war machine who achieved a turn-around in US policy (from non-interventionist to Neo Can war hawks) and had two anti-Israeli regimes turned to dust (not least revenge was taken out on the Scud-firing Iraq).

Ask yourself this: Who had the most to gain from the attacks and why has the evidence of Israeli involvement never been fairly discussed?

2. What kills more of our people every year?

If the duty of our government is to protect our people, why are they getting dragged (or running into!) foreign wars of a Neo-Con hawk nature when they cannot keep our own people safe on the streets of Britain?

David Cameron is showing his true Neo Con colours by urging military action against Libya. Another war for foreign interests alien to our own? Cameron is proving to be Blair mark II.

Meanwhile ask yourself this, in the last 10 years:

  • How many British people got mugged or burgled (inc unreported cases)?
  • How many British people got hooked on heroin?
  • How many British people had their homes repossessed?
  • How many British people lost decent jobs and have to scrape to make ends meet in McJobs or part-time employment with few rights?

and compare that to the number of British people murdered, injured etc. by "international terrorism."

I would suggest that more British people have been harmed by the banksters and their greed, or by the police who refuse to practice zero tolerance against muggers, burglars and dealers than have ever been harmed by any 'Axis of Evil,' Islamicist extremists etc.

3. And finally: who do our government obey?

If there is evidence that Israelis were (at the very least) involved in "911" and were active with explosives in NYC on the same day; if the Israelis had most to gain from the 'War on Terror'; if more British people have their lives taken, ruined or greatly disturbed by organised and petty criminals in the UK (especially English inner cities); why do successive governments pretend that their first priority is to protect UK citizens?

Why are we being lied to?

Why is our foreign policy being propped up by a huge lie?

Why is our domestic policy to let hundreds every day fall victim to robbery, violence and worse?

I don't want a police state, and I would argue that the 60s liberal experiment (and the explosion of single-parent families) and mass immigration has ruined communities to such an effect that many people no longer know right from wrong, no longer care for justice, for duty, for respect.

However, having a police force that actually deals with complaints of mugging, or burglary, or drug-taking and drug-pushing instead of worrying about if homosexuals can stay in hotels -- might that not be a good start?

Left: You think it's bad here? The US media is screamingly pro-Zionist and its two-party state is sewn up by the Israeli lobby. They pump billions into foreign wars and Israeli weaponry, whilst many of their own inner cities are war zones and are awash with drugs.


Don't expect the media or politicians to worry about this though. They are mostly pro-Israeli, many of them snort cocaine, most of them don't live in 'multi-culti' hell-holes or single-parent family sink estates and when it comes to 60s liberalism most of them are queer-friendly.

In short, nothing is set to change because the media, politicians and for that matter the banksters too form a circle of dependence. They are in each-others pockets and while they will justify all manner of foreign adventures to "protect British people" the very idea of actually protecting British people is anathema to them.

The other day I read an article about the efforts to get a foreign type of prawn out of a freshwater site because it was ruining the habitat of native species. Specialists, politicians and the media were involved and interested in catching and killing this alien threat to indigenous species.

Yet when have we ever had "specialists, politicians and the media" warn us of the effects of mass immigration? Habitats (eg the white communities of inner London) were decimated and destroyed in decades.

Today the politicians and media gurus will tell us how successful immigration has been.

Do you see it yet?

Whether it's the "War on Terror," crime, drugs, liberalism, homosexuality, abortion - you can virtually pick the topic at will! - this ruling elite does not have our interests at heart.

For them to pretend otherwise is sick in the extreme.

As the Skrewdriver song stated in the wake of the immigrant murder of the elderly patriot Albert Marriner in the early 80s: Now look at a sick society... Do we seriously think it's got better?

Friday, 4 June 2010

Eyewitness to Israeli Terror Attack

Unlike the USS Liberty terror attack, this cannot be hushed by the Zionist Lobby.

Israel's Ultimate Chutzpah

Mark Steel: Of course, they were asking for it
Wednesday, 2 June 2010

Link:
They Were Asking For it

It's time the Israeli government's PR team made the most of its talents, and became available for hire. Then whenever a nutcase marched into a shopping mall in somewhere like Wisconsin and gunned down a selection of passers-by, they could be on hand to tell the world's press "The gunman regrets the loss of life but did all he could to avoid violence." Then various governments would issue statements saying "All we know is a man went berserk with an AK 47, and next to him there's a pile of corpses, so until we know the facts we can't pass judgement on what took place."

To strengthen their case the Israelis have released a photo of the weapons they found on board, (which amount to some knives and tools and wooden sticks) that the naive might think you'd expect to find on any ship, but the more astute will recognise as exactly what you'd carry if you were planning to defeat the Israeli army. It's an armoury smaller than you'd find in the average toolshed in a garden in Cirencester, which goes to show the Israelis had better destroy Cirencester quickly as an essential act of self-defence.It's a shame they weren't more imaginative, as they could have said "We also discovered a deadly barometer, a ship's compass, which could not only be frisbeed at someone's head but even had markings to help the assailant know which direction he was throwing it, and a set of binoculars that could easily be converted into a ray-gun.

That would be as logical as the statement from the Israeli PM's spokesman – "We made every possible effort to avoid this incident." Because the one tiny thing they forgot to do to avoid this incident was not send in armed militia from helicopters in the middle of the night and shoot people. I must be a natural at this sort of technique because I often go all day without climbing off a helicopter and shooting people, and I'm not even making every possible effort. Politicians and commentators worldwide repeat a version of this line. They're aware a nation has sent its militia to confront people carrying provisions for the desperate, in the process shooting several of them dead, and yet they angrily blame the dead ones. One typical headline yesterday read "Activists got what they wanted – confrontation." It's an attitude so deranged it deserves to be registered as a psychosis, something like "Reverse Slaughter Victim Confusion Syndrome".

Israel and its supporters claim that Viva Palestina, made up of people who collect the donated food, cement and items for providing basic amenities such as toilets, and transport them to Gaza, wanted the violence all along. Because presumably they must have been thinking "Hezbollah couldn't beat them, but that's because unlike us they didn't have a ballcock and several boxes of plum tomatoes".

One article told us the flotilla was full of "Thugs spoiling for a confrontation", and then accused them of being "Less about aid and more about PR. Indeed, on board was Swedish novelist Henning Mankell." So were they thugs or about PR? Did they have a thugs' section and a PR quarter, or did they all muck in, the novelist diverting the soldiers with his characterisation while the thugs attacked them with a lethal spirit level?

But some defenders of Israel are so blind to what happens in front of them there's nothing at all they wouldn't jump to defend. Israel could blow up a cats home and within five minutes they'd be yelling "How do we know the cats weren't smuggling semtex in their fur for Hamas?"

If this incident had been carried about by Iran, or anyone we were trying to portray as an enemy, so much condemnation would have been spewed out it would have created a vast cloud of outrage that airlines would be unable to fly through.

But as it's Israel, most governments offer a few diplomatic words that blame no one, but accept the deaths are "regrettable". They might as well have picked any random word from the dictionary, so the news would tell us "William Hague described the deaths as 'hexagonal'", and a statement from the US senate said "It's all very confusing. In future let's hope they make every effort to avoid a similar incident."

Saturday, 27 February 2010

Christmas Underwear Bomber: Mossad Link

What a surprise!

In recent posts we have learnt how Neo-Cons/Masons were behind the Bologna massacre, and how Israelis were arrested attempting one more terror plot in New York on "911" only to be released.

Really, it's getting to the stage where these people can be rightly said to be the state sponsors of terrorism par excellence!

Links:
American Free Press Article
Press TV article

The Bologna Bombing: Who & What Was the NAR?

NAR Blamed for the Bologna Massacre

Who and What Was the NAR?


by M. Fishwick

Before arriving at the history of the Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari, NAR, which in turn cannot be successfully explained without presenting a brief outline history of the post-war national struggle in Italy, it would be equally useful to review the general background of Italy in which the history is set.

Overview

After the destruction and chaos of the Second World War, Italy found herself to be very much a part of the frontline theatre of a titanic life and death struggle between the Soviet sphere of interest and the Atlantic Alliance.

Liberals, the Christian Democrats backed by the USA and NATO, held precariously onto the reins of national government against a widespread and militant Communist base consisting of former partisans and their areas of support.

Surviving members of the Fascisti had re-grouped under the banner of the Italian Social Movement, MSI, against a backdrop of persecution directed by the Liberal State allied with the bloodlust of former partisans, and they had begun to rebuild social, cultural and political structures.

Many parts of Italy, if not controlled by Communists, fell increasingly under the power and influence of the Mafia and similar crime syndicates that had been all but wiped out by Mussolini but were now free again to re-exert their dominion.

In similar manner Masonry, all but destroyed as an operational entity by Mussolini, re-asserted itself on an organisational level and spread its tentacles widely throughout the structures of the Italian State and Big Business.

The Atlantic Alliance developed underground guerrilla cells and ammunition dumps as part of its Operation Gladio network, and the Soviet sphere aided Red Terrorist cells throughout western Europe.

From 1945 to the mid-1980's Italy was the scene of a lingering chaos, verging upon civil war. Italy became a pawn in the geo-political machinations and conflict that existed firstly between the USSR and NATO, and secondly between the USSR/Arab nations and the USA/Israeli axis.

Bombings, assassinations, kidnappings, hijackings, and arms-trafficking were a feature of life common to Italy for four decades after the end of World War Two due largely to the geo-political Strategy of Tension instigated by the CIA.

Targetted kidnappings, bombings and assassinations were routinely carried out and claimed by the Red Brigades and kindred groups. Several indiscriminate bombings have never been resolved but were automatically blamed upon 'neo-fascists' - convenient scapegoats who were hated by all the major powers at play. But it made no sense for weak and powerless 'neo-fascists' to engage in such immoral, indiscriminate, killing when they prided themselves on being a movement from, of, and for the Italian people. Such senseless acts of indicrimate horror could achieve nothing except facilitate further hatred towards them and result in their further repression.

The intense investigations into terrorism during the 1980's and 1990's eventually brought various State Secrets to light that explained and made sense of these murderous and indiscriminate bombing atrocities. They were designed to reign in the Christian Democrats to the US-Israeli axis and force them away from agreements made with the Italian Communists and from relationships built with Socialist Arab countries such as Libya.

Amongst other things the Christian Democrats had forged a secret agreement with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine so that the Italian government would turn a blind eye to PFLP related arms trafficking and other activities in return for the PFLP not launching attacks in Italy.

The Bologna railway station massacre was the final act in a series of indiscriminate bombings that shook Italy during those decades. This time, the ramifications of the act spread far beyond Italy due to the high level of casualties and because a number of casualties amongst the 85 dead and two hundred or so injured were foreign tourists. The international outcry was enormous.

As usual, the atrocity was immediately blamed on 'neo-fascists'. Italian Prime Minister of the time, and former Minister of the Interior in charge of the Italian Secret Service organisations, Francesco Cossiga, announced the "fact" to the Italian Senate and it led to a severe persecution of young nationalists that included mass round-ups, long imprisonments without trial, torture, severe beatings and deaths during arrest or whilst in custody. Many of those who managed to successfully escape the persecution found themselves exiled abroad for many years. After the many years of investigation into the bombing Francesco Cossiga now publicly states that he is certain that 'neo-fascists' had nothing to do with the terrorist outrage.

As the investigations into the terrorist activity surrounding Bologna progressed during the 1980's and 1990's the secret agreements of the Italian State with sections of the Palestinian resistance became known, although never officially admitted until 2008. With the benefit of this knowledge, and especially with its official admittance at long last, it is easily understood, for example, why the presence of Thomas Kram, a leading activist of the German Revolutionary Cells and ally of the PLPF, who arrived in Bologna the night before the bombing and left Bologna immediately after the bombing, was hidden from public view by the Italian State investigators for many years.

The obvious conclusion to be drawn is that either Kram had some involvement in planting the bomb or that the bomb was planted in order to implicate Kram, and hence the PFLP, bringing pressure upon the Christian Democrat government of Italy to publicly condemn and suppress the Palestinian arms trafficking network and re-orientate themselves to the United States/Israeli axis.

As always, the fundamental question to be asked is who benefits? When the question is considered it becomes difficult to conclude other than that the atrocity was not the work of a 'neo-fascist' network or a Palestinian network, neither of which had anything to gain from such actions but much to lose, but was typically the work of either the CIA or Israeli Mossad.

War on the Streets: The Years of Lead

In order to trace the origin and development of NAR, the armed gang led by Valerio Fioravanti to which the guilt of the Bologna massacre was attributed by the media and politicians and then upheld by the criminal courts, it is necessary to return to the MSI.

The MSI had been formed in 1946 by former minor officials of the Fascist regime. Just ten years later the ideas and principles of its members and supporters began to be severely compromised and then subverted as its leaders sought to build an alliance with Christian Democrats and conservatives. The MSI began to pursue an Atlanticist orientation and inevitably a number of non-compromising associations formed from within its ranks. A number of groups, such as the Fronte Universitario d’Azione Nazionale, FUAN, stayed under the MSI umbrella whilst pursuing an almost autonomous direction, whilst other groups of militants such as Ordine Nuovo and Avanguardia Nazionale left MSI and went their own way.

By the 1970's the MSI had become an object of derision for the younger generation of Italian patriots. It was increasingly becoming something to be despised and hated. The reason was not merely the ideological sell-out of the MSI leadership but, incredibly, their point-blank refusal to make use their many contacts amongst the Establishment parties and police in order to provide protection for local headquarters and street activists in face of an increasingly frequent level of, often deadly, Red violence against the MSI rank and file.

For example:

7th July, 1972: A typical Red "Commando Raid" was made upon the house of a member of the MSI youth organisation, Fronte della Gioventù. The FdG activist, Carlo Falvella, of Salerno, was stabbed to death.

16th April, 1973: An arson attack was conducted upon the house of MSI member, Mario Mattei, in Primavalle, Rome. Two of his sons, Stefano and Virgilio aged 10 and 22, were murdered in the attack.

28th February, 1975: A Greek student, a member of the MSI's university group FUAN, Mikis Mantakas, was shot and murdered in Rome.

13th March, 1975: FdG member, Sergio Ramelli, was shot dead outside Mass in Milan.

30th September, 1977: Hundreds of Reds violently besieged the local MSI headquarters in Balduina, Rome. The fighting lasted for hours until the small number of FdG activists inside the building found an escape route. Chased by the Red mob, and fleeing for their lives, future NAR activists Christiano Fioravanti and Alesandro Alibrandi fired upon the chasing mob killing one of them, a member of the murderous Communist group Lotta Continua.

7th January, 1978: FdG activists Franco Bigonzetti and Francesco Ciavatta were shot dead in a hail of machine gun bullets whilst leaving the MSI headquarters in Via Acca Larentia, Rome. A third young activist is wounded. The Roman MSI gathered in the street to pay honour to the victims and to protest at the massacre of its young activists. A captain of the Carabinieri, Edoardo Siveri, drew his pistol at the increasingly angry demonstrators and shot dead young FdG member Stefano Recchioni. He lay dying in the arms of future NAR activist Francesca Mambro.

In such circumstances young nationalists were forced to act to provide a measure of necessary safety and protection for themselves, their families, and their comrades. The testimonies of young militants of the time are striking:

"The physical struggle for us had value as a test of strength, but also the problem is that we need to contextualise it and at the time there were something like 5,000 attacks and 600-700 deaths, at least 5 violent events per day, and it was not possible even to affix posters without a physical clash... In Italy between 1973 and 1982, at least, we lived in a condition of real civil war hence it was not possible to reject a fight; it meant giving up going out into the streets.

The problem is also to understand when and where the civil war originated... there were the ex-partisans who were teaching that to kill a fascist is not a crime, and then there were groups like Avanguardia Operaia which first theorised and then practised the elimination of fascists. On a TV programme the other day they said that on the extreme left the armed groups were started in self-defence. However, the first person to be beaten with a bar in Italy, Spano, who ended up in a wheelchair, was beaten up by the student movement, the first person to be killed by a bottle full of sand was Ermanno Vinturini in Genoa, the first person to be shot dead was Mikis Mantakas in Rome. I believe that even the first person to be knifed was Falvella in Salerno... on the left the situation turned really nasty, therefore the taste for civil war was developed by the extreme left.. I mean to say that the left developed a strategy of hatred, this is important... on the left there was a culture of hatred, because if we look at what happened in Italy in 1919-1921, they used to kill in a heinous way, they dismembered alive those whom they took prisoners during the civil war."

Gabriele Adinolfi, former leader of Terza Posizione. .

"In the late 1970's the political scene was even harder and access to weapons became a matter of survival. Naturally we were particularly vulnerable to the slogan 'to kill a fascist is not a crime'. It became impossible to go to school without risk. In addition, we had also been betrayed by the party leaders. That bitter struggle completely ruined the lives of many young people. Some were murdered, others ended up in prison with very serious penalties in comparison to their crimes... From the police we received only beatings and torture whilst leftists acted with impunity."
Massimo Morsello, (Requiescat in pace), former activist of Fronte Universitario d’Azione Nazionale, Via Siena.

"It was a very dangerous period for those who were active in politics, both on the left and on the right. There was a lot of violence. I remember that when we went out at night my mother would wait for us until two or three in the morning and she used to tell us of the many explosions she had heard. It was not infrequent to open a paper and find news of ten bombs which had exploded in one day. Where I lived we had five attacks, at Francesca's house there were two, they put a bomb on the windowsill in the mezzanine room where she slept, aged eighteen and with two younger brothers.... Then there was this episode which she witnessed in person of a captain of the Carabinieri who killed one of ours. He did it in front of all the leaders of the MSI. And the whole MSI pretended not to have seen. And the reactions in the papers the next day were extremely harsh, but when Francesca said, 'We need to report what we saw, we need to go to the police', nobody wanted to go with her, because for the party to lose the votes of the police force was too serious... And so for me, for her, for all the others, this triggered a final revolt against the MSI which had sold us out".
Valerio Fioravanti, former leader of NAR.

"The 1970s were days when left-wing kids were forever beating up right-wing ones and vice versa. At the beginning, I had friends on both sides. But the right somehow always seemed to get the worst of it. I couldn't help identifying with that." And after she witnessed the cold-blooded murder of Stefano Recchioni by a policeman: "I swore I would never go anywhere without a gun."
Francesca Mambro, former leader of NAR

"During the 1970's, in ninety-eight percent of all cases, the radical right played the role of victims... We were victims of the political situation, of the political unrepresentativeness of our community - a community subject to fierce reprisals."
Marcello de Angelis, Italian Senator, former activist of Terza Posizione.

The "fierce reprisals" against young nationalists for daring to oppose the Christian Democrat/Communist Party status quo came from the police and the Secret State as well as from the Reds.

On 10th January, 1979, the first anniversary of the Acca Larentia massacre that saw the murder of two young activists of the FdG by Reds, and another murdered by police, the FdG and FUAN held a protest of remembrance outside the Christian Democrat headquarters in Centocelle, in the centre of Rome. The protest passed without incident and the demonstrators began to quietly disperse and return home. An unmarked police car targetted two stragglers Alberto Giaquinto, of FdG, and Massimo Morsello, of FUAN. After following them for a short distance two plainclothes policemen got out of the car and followed the boys on foot. Suddenly one of them, Alessio Speranza, pulled out a gun and shot Alberto Giaquinto in the head. At first the police claimed that Giaquinto brandished a gun, but the story had to be dropped because there were too many impartial and independent witnesses at the murder scene. There was no gun. Shortly afterwards another GdF militant, Stefano Cecchin, was murdered in a drive-by shooting by whilst sitting at a pavement cafe. The primary witness to the Gianquilo murder, his comrade Massimo Morsello, insisted, despite threats, upon testifying against the police. For Massimino's trouble the policemen were later found not guilty and an arrest warrant was consequently issued against Morsello in revenge for him pursuing the trial against the policemen. Massimo managed to flee Italy and was later found guilty in abstentia of the 'crime' of subversive association and armed gang and sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

It was the murder of the young nationalist, Stefano Recchioni, by the police in January, 1978, that finally drove thousands of young activists completely away from the MSI. The leadership of MSI had even refused to demand the arrest of Siveri. Something was rotten to the core.

At that point most of the former MSI-GdF militants began to engage themselves in political struggle with the radical and innovative nationalist group Terza Posizione. Others gave in to despair and turned their back upon political struggle in favour of a hopeless and nihilistic armed struggle. The reference point of the latter became the embryonic NAR which was built upon a small circle of close-knit friends around Valerio Fioravanti. Fioravanti began to direct NAR actions against everyone and anyone whom they perceived as an enemy, including, before long, Terza Posizione.

Former NAR leader, Valerio Fiorantini explains:

"... in reality our target were not the Carabinieri, our aim was to kill our treacherous father, in a mythological sense, to kill the MSI which had sold us out... it is true that the characteristic of the NAR, even from a criminal statistics point of view, was that of a group which in percentage terms shot at members of the police forces more often than all the groups of the extreme left. But what is really serious, from an ethical point of view, is that in reality our hatred was not directed at the police, our wish was to get the MSI into trouble once and for all. And also to break that mechanism that we had seen also with the radical groups, according to which the big groups use the small ones to acquire more power for themselves and later abandon them when the time is right. This is what was happening with Terza Posizione."

In 1976 an independent student organisation, Lotta Studentesca, was founded in Rome at the library of Walter Spedicato by 17 year old Roberto Fiore, 20 year old Giuseppe Dimitri, and 22 year old Gabriele Adinolfi. It quickly built up a solid activist base amongst young Romans disillusioned with the ideological sell-out of the MSI. Chief amongst them were brothers Nazzareno (Nanni) and Marcello de Angelis. In 1978 Lotta Studentesca broadened its horizons with the help of Francesco Mangiameli, a literature professor from Sicily and former MSI politician, to organise as a national movement. It changed its name to Terza Posizione. TP began to recruit heavily from the hundreds of militants then leaving MSI in droves and soon established itself throughout Italy.

From its beginning TP took an independent line in everything under the slogan "Neither Red Front Nor Reaction". Because of its intransigent ideological stance, its incredible vitality in terms of innovative and miltant activity, and its disciplined and hierarchical structure, it soon became an object of hatred not just for the Italian State and the Reds, but also for the right-wing MSI and the embryonic NAR who preached and practised an anarchic "armed spontaneity".

At one stage Gianfranco Fini, then National Secretary of the MSI's youth wing, even encouraged its militants to physically oppose TP on the streets. It only resulted in more militants turning their backs upon MSI and becoming active with the growing TP.

Whilst, on the one hand, Terza Posizione was hated by the MSI leadership for presenting a militant ideological alternative to their pro-U.S. and Statist orientation, it began to be hated in equal measure by Fioravanti and his close friends who, after leaving FdG, began to publicly use the acronym NAR in specific reference to themselves. For the wild, hot-headed, youths of NAR, Terza Posizione was not militant enough. NAR wanted through its actions to encourage an anarchic form of guerrilla warfare on the streets, directed largely against the police and Establishment figures; a black version of the Red Brigades. To do this they needed to influence the militants but Terza Posizione was successfully orientating them into constructive political, social, economic and community actions aimed at building a living cultural reference in opposition to the moribund and decayed ideas of right and left. The success of Terza Posizione was preventing the nihilistic influence of NAR from spreading to any great degree.

NAR leader Francesca Mambro explained: "We were a thorn in everybody's sides. The political right wanted nothing to do with us. The extra-parliamentary right, the grown-up Fascist bands, thought we were just a bunch of snotty kids. We simply didn't count".

From that moment, from virtually the beginning of Terza Posizione, TP became an object of hatred for NAR. The TP leadership had made clear in its publications that whilst it was always in favour of self-defence against aggressive attacks, it was steadfastly opposed to the immoral "armed spontaneity" called for by the nascent NAR.

Marcello de Angelis, Italian Senator and former TP militant: "With NAR relations were so bad that 'Giusva' [Valerio] Fioravanti had decided to take out our leaders in order to take all the power of the area."

The watershed in the short, but legendary, life of Terza Posizione came late in 1979. Some of its members, including one of the founders, 'Peppe' Dimitri, began to leave TP and gravitate towards the orbit of NAR. Dimitri and two others were arrested, in December 1979, in the act of transporting boxes of machine guns, rifles and hand-grenades.

Although Terza Posizione publicly disassociated itself from the incident the Italian State were presented with the excuse that they were looking for in order to destroy TP. Even though Peppe Dimitri confirmed that his clandestine action had been unknown to TP, the State set to work and launched an 'investigation' attempting to establish that there existed two levels of Terza Posizione: one level being militant and extra-parliamentary but above board, the other clandestine and involved in acts of terrorism. Nothing could be established but the State seized its opportunity in September 1980 whilst the nation was in a mood for "fascist blood" in wake of the Bologna atrocity. Arrest warrants against TP leaders and militants were issued on 23rd September, 1980, under the pretext of the peculiar Italian 'catch-all' crime of 'subversive association and armed gang'.

Dozens of young people were rounded-up in a series of brutal raids, whilst dozens more received warning just in time and managed to evade the dragnet. Some, including Roberto Fiore, Gabriele Adinolfi, Walter Spedicato and Marcello de Angelis managed to flee abroad and spent years, even decades, in exile. Others, such as Nanni de Angelis, were caught before they could leave the country and suffered severe beatings and, in many cases, five years in jail without trial before being released after being found not guilty of what they were charged with. Nanni de Angelis was murdered inside a police-cell on 5th October, 1980, after having being arrested and beaten senseless by the police earlier that day.

In January 1981 members of the Italian Secret Military Intelligence Service, SISMI, directed by P2 Masonic Lodge 'godfather' Licio Gelli, attempted to conclude the State operation against TP by planting a suitcase containing weapons and the same type of explosive that was used in the Bologna massacre, on the Taranto-Milano Express train along with a fabricated paper trail implicating Terza Posizione leaders Roberto Fiore and Gabriele Adinolfi. This set-up, by using the same difficult to obtain explosive, was intended not just to implicate Fiore and Adinolfi in terrorist activity but also to fabricate a link between NAR, who had already been blamed by SISMI for the August 1980 Bologna massacre, and Terza Posizione.

Two very high-ranking SISMI officers, General Pietro Musumeci and Colonel Giuseppe Belmonte, SISMI officer Francesco Pazienza, along with a SISMI operative, Massimo Carminati, who was working within both NAR and the Magliana mafia organisation, as well as P2 godfather Licio Gelli, were all later found guilty and jailed for preparing and instigating the black operation.

Interestingly, a phone-call received by the Italian press agency ANSA a little over three hours after the Bologna explosion, and greatly publicised at the time, claimed the Bologna bomb on behalf of NAR. The phone-call was later found to have originated from the Florence office of SISMI.

The State persecution of Terza Posizione in wake of the mass round-up of nationalists provided just the opportunity that NAR had been looking for in order to destroy TP for their own purposes. A series of murderous attacks were launched against TP by Fioravanti's gang which first resulted in the cold-blooded killing of Terza Posizione leader Francesco Mangiameli in Rome on 9th September, 1980. Hatred of the TP leadership was so intense, and so insane, that Fioravanti had even planned to travel to Sicily in order to murder Mangiameli's wife and young daughter at their home. Fioraventi was prevented from doing so by the early discovery of Francesco Mangiemeli's hidden body. The discovery foiled Fioravanti's plan to eradicate the Terza Posizione leadership before they realised what was going on, allowing defensive measures to be taken. Knowing this, Fioravanti and Mambro then made public their intent to kill Fiore and Adinolfi. Several young TP militants such as Luca Perucci and Marco Pizzaro were also murdered by NAR.

The State show-trial against Terza Posizione for 'subversive association and armed gang', concluded on 12th March, 1985, with NAR leaders such as Valerio Fioravanti and Francesca Mambro being falsely presented by the Court as members of Terza Posizione in order to keep up the State-fabricated appearance of a TP-NAR 'link'. Fiore, Adinolfi and de Angelis, who were all safely in exile at the time, were sentenced to 9, 8 and 6 years respectively, in abstentia. The sentences were later reduced by the Court of Appeal and timed-out.

Although the fabricated sentence has not yet been overturned, or the TP men officially pardoned, the President of the Parliamentary Commission of Enquiry on Terrorism in Italy clarified on public record during its 77th Session, 17th January, 2001, that their conviction, and that of Massimo Morsello who was later convicted of the same charge in a trial against NAR, was on the basis of 'subversive association' and not membership of an 'armed gang'.

Massimo Morsello's inclusion in the NAR trial, which was held after the TP trial had concluded, was an act of revenge for him daring to become an official witness against a policeman in regard to the cold-blooded murder of Alberto Giaquinto. His inclusion in the NAR trial was based solely on the 'strength' that he was a member of the FUAN university group that was based at the MSI'svia Sienna headquarters in Rome. The same MSI premises had been frequented by the Fioravanti brothers, Francesca Mambro, and other members of the FdG circle that would later evolve into NAR. Not-with-standing the fact that literally hundreds of other people also regularly frequented the same MSI headquarters in Rome, Morsello was targetted on this 'evidence' and received a ten year sentence in abstentia for this extremely tenuous guilt by association.

The official request for the trial of Terza Posizione submitted to the Roman Judiciary by State Investigators actually explains the basis of 'subversion' that Terza Posizione was considered 'guilty' of.

Firstly, in Chapter B3 it is made clear that: "The subversive aims and conduct of members of the Third Position in propagating the ideology of the movement through the dissemination of newspapers, written hand-outs, collection of memberships and building sympathy in the neighbourhoods, must be fully considered and understood as the normal archetype of the movement."

Then in Chapter B4 one reads that TP should be suppressed because it presents a potential danger to the personality of the Liberal Democratic State!

"It is clear here that, within the penal code, the association is facing charges precisely because of the particularly dangerous nature that it presents... with the result that the commission or consumption of unlawful acts that fulfill the purpose of the movement are not necessary. The indictment, in fact, seeks to avoid determining conditions for perpetration of crimes against the personality of the State."

And then:

"The Third Position is a clearly functional organisation in respect to achieving its subversive end. As already mentioned, the associations of the neighbourhood and those that exist in schools are, for Third Position, the appropriate structures from which the avant-garde transmit their values and embryonic structures to form an alternative to the constitutional development of the people... The task of these associations is to serve as centres of reference and proselytising activity in the name of the principles of which the members conduct themselves. But also to create the awakening of a popular consciousness. The end is clearly to transform civil disobedience into popular organisational education and to build a stable and decisive alternative that completes the organisation as a statelet."

In other words, the persecutions and trials directed against Terza Posizione by the Italian State constituted a politically-motivated repression launched to protect the Liberal Democratic State against subversive ideas and a growing network of alternative and self-sufficient counter-power structures within communities that increasingly rejected the Liberal Idea and the Liberal Regime.

A Short History of NAR Activity

The Armed Revolutionary Nuclei was founded in 1978 by a small group of friends belonging to the youth organisation of the MSI: Valerio Fioravanti, his brother Cristiano Fioravanti, Francesco Anselmi, and Alessandro Alibrandi. Several others, such as Francesca Mambro and SISMI agent provocateur Massimo Carminati, would later become central to its criminal activities.

Excluding the 85 deaths resulting from the Bologna railway station bombing, which all the former members of NAR deny involvement in even to this day, the NAR reign of terror claimed more than 30 lives during its four year operational period from 1978 to 1982.

According to the testimony of Cristiano Fioravanti, who in return for the dropping of charges gave evidence against his brother and former friends upon being arrested in 1982, the first organised action of the group took place on 28th February, 1978, when they ambushed and shot dead a member of the Communist terror group Lotta Continua, and injured another.

6th March, 1978: NAR raided an armoury to acquire more weapons, an action that resulted in the death of Francesco Anselmi. In 1975 Anselmi had spent three months in a coma that resulted in a severe loss of eyesight after one of many attacks upon him by Communists. At the armoury he was unaware that a guard had managed to free himself and he was consequently shot in the back.

18th March, 1978: NAR ambushed and shot dead two Communist activists at a social centre.

17th May, 1978: the Rome armoury was attacked in an act of revenge for Anselmi's death.

Valerio Fioravanti then enlisted in the army and managed to supply NAR with 144 hand-grenades stolen from the armoury before being drummed out and jailed for eight-months for dereliction of duty and stealing an army truck.

9th January, 1979: NAR set fire to the premises of a small left-wing radio station and raked it with machine-gun fire, injuring four employees.

15th March, 1979: an arms raid was conducted at Omnia Sport in the centre of Rome.

16th June, 1979: the Communist Party headquarters in a district of Rome was attacked with two hand-grenades and several rounds of gun-fire. 25 people were injured.

17th December, 1979: an innocent man, Antonio Leandro, was murdered due to mistaken identity in the attempted targetted killing of a lawyer.

6th February, 1980: a young policeman was murdered in cold-blood in order to steal his machine-gun.

30th March, 1980: a raid was conducted upon a small military post to steal weapons. A sargeant was wounded.

28th May, 1980: a policeman was killed and two colleagues badly injured in an ambush.

23rd June, 1980: NAR killed the Deputy Prosecutor of Rome.

2nd August, 1980: 85 civilians were murdered by a bomb at Bologna railway station. A phone call was received by a news agency claiming the action on behalf of NAR, resulting in a wild mass persecution of nationalists by the Italian State. Many innocent young men and women were forced into exile or imprisoned, sometimes for several years, without being convicted of any offence. An official investigation later traced the phone-call to the Florence offices of the Italian Secret Military Intelligence Service, SISMI.

9th September, 1980: Third Position leader Francesco Mangiameli was targetted and killed by NAR.

5th February, 1981: three NAR activists were challenged by two carabienieri whilst collecting weapons from a secret arms dump near Padua. The two policemen were killed and NAR's leader, Valerio Fioravanti, was badly wounded in both legs. He was taken to an address in Padua by Francesca Mambro and Alessandro Alibrandi and captured later that night after phoning for an ambulance.

8th April, 1981: NAR founder Cristiano Fioravanti was arrested and testified against his colleagues in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

30th September, 1981: NAR killed Third Position militant Marco Pizzaro.

21st October, 1981: NAR ambushed and killed a Digos (General Investigations Division and special Operations) police captain.

5th December, 1981: NAR founder Alessandro Alibrandi was killed in a gunfight with police.

5th March, 1982: Francesca Mambro was injured and captured by police after a shoot-out during an attempted bank robbery.

5th May, 1982: George Vale, the last remaining fugitive of Fioravanti's close circle of murderous companions was tracked down by police and killed during a siege.

Despite NAR leaders Fioravanti and Mambro readily acknowledging NAR's involvement in the murderous activities above, and many more besides, they have always denied that they or their organisation had any involvement in the massacre at Bologna railway station. They continue to deny it to this very day despite having been convicted and having served two decades of their lives in prison for it.

Bologna Bombing "Not Work of Fascists" -- Investigation to be Re-Opened

Quote from later Corriere Della Sera:

Carlos the jackal for the first time before an Italian judge, said the response in the French language: "The massacre of August 2, Bologna, is not the work of fascists."

According to Carlos, the August 2, 1980 massacre (85 victims) was ... "organized by the CIA and Mossad" in order to "punish and subdue Rome."

"We have always been convinced that it was organized by the American and Israeli services, they are the true "lords of the black terror" in Italy."

Will Searchshite magazine now apologise for 30 years of lies, defamation and subterfuge?



Former left-wing activist, and current spokesman for the Pdl government coalition in Italy, Daniele Capezzone, publicly called for the investigation into the Bologna Bombing to be re-opened on the 29th anniversary of the horrific massacre that shook Italy and the whole of Europe on August 2nd, 1980.

Link

Capezzone expressed what many people of all political persuasions believe about the terrorist atrocity and the events surrounding it when he stated that there are still "serious doubts" relating to the facts surrounding the massacre, and the guilt of those convicted for directly carrying out the bombing.

Capezzone stated that "The reconstructed in judgments leaves doubts heavy, and I think justified, in many of us. The 'dogma' of the fascist massacre seems rather an assumed ideological convenience for many, but certainly does not seem a convincing truth."

The call for the investigation to be fully re-opened comes at a time when Valerio Fioravanti, the leader of the armed gang that was immediately blamed for planting the bomb, has just been released from prison after 29 years.

Fioravanti and fellow NAR activist Francesca Mambra, whom was also convicted on the same charge and whom he later married in prison, have always denied any involvement in the Bologna massacre whilst at the same time readily admitting to a number of killings and robberies of banks and arms depots.

In April 2007 Luigi Ciavardini, who has always stated that Fioravanti and Mambro were with him in Treviso when the bombing took place in Bologna, was also given final sentence, after a long appeals process lasting many years, to 30 years imprisonment for planting the bomb in Bologna. Incredibly, the conviction is based on absolutely no evidence other than hearsay. [our emphasis - FC]

The Bologna massacre became the climax of a period known in Italy as "the years of lead".

After the destruction of Italy during the Second World War the United States found that they had created a situation where Italy was in serious danger of becoming a Communist satellite State allied to the Soviet Union.

In a long-term strategic response known as Operation Gladio, the US and NATO began to organise underground guerrilla cells and secret arms depots facilitated by the P2 Masonic Lodge and Italian crime syndicates.

A destabilisation campaign was orchestrated that resulted in kidnappings, assassinations and bombings involving the Red Brigades on the one hand, and CIA/P2/crime syndicate sponsored cells on the other, which were blamed generically on 'neo-fascists'.

The 'Strategy of Tension', as it has come to be known, also resulted inevitably in widespread tit for tat violence on the streets and in the schools between young anarchists/communists and nationalists.

A few of these street groups, from both sides, degenerated into little more than armed criminal gangs. It is to one of these groups, Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari (NAR), to which the blame for the Bologna Bombing massacre was immediately attributed by the powers-that-be.

The result was a vicious mass round-up of hundreds of young nationalists, the vast majority of whom had been engaged in purely political actions opposed to both left and right wings of the System. Beatings, tortures, imprisonments without trial and murders in custody were the order of the day.

The investigations and trials relating to the Bologna massacre and the surrounding events of those years eventually determined that the head of the P2 Masonic Lodge, Licio Gelli, and General Pietro Musumeci, Second-in-Command of the Italian Military Intelligence Secret Service (SISMI), as well as SISMI operatives Francesco Pazienza and Giuseppe Belmonte, had fabricated evidence against a number of young nationalists in order to tie them in with the Bologna terrorist outrage and similar atrocities.

Thursday, 18 February 2010

911: Missing Links

Please be patient whilst waiting for this 2 hour video to load.

The BNP claims it was for views like this that Cllr Simon Smith was expelled.

It is views like this that the Neo Cons want to hide away or condemn.

It is commentary like this that the BBC has tried to disprove and besmirch.

Open your eyes. It all began long ago!


Sunday, 26 July 2009

Endless Wars, Democracy and a Masonic Oligarchy


I watched the news in disbelief earlier today.

Right: Harry Patch pictured in 2007

The passing away of the last WW1 veteran, Harry Patch, was the main headline. The endless rows of white headstones was shown as a testament to the futility of war.

A speech by the gent was played in which he urged everyone to remember the dead of both sides.

The pointlessness of wars and the needless dead were the overwhelming message.

Then, before more news of yet another dead soldier in Afghanistan (they don't tell us news of the dead Mujahadeen) we had Gordon Brown on to waffle how the dead of WW1 sacrificed all so we could live in a democracy!

WHAT A TWIT. And I cleaned that up.

These idiots, these wilful poltroons, these profiteering pygmies, these bureaucratic cowards, these lying war-mongers... these war criminals par excellence just do not get it!

Not one soldier died in WW1 "for democracy."

Just as not one soldier dies in Afghanistan to "defend our country."

More meaningless wars by which the politicians get back-handers, bribes and positions. More cannon fodder are sent to die in the name of "democracy" so an elected oligarchy, kept in place by a corrupt party system an a subservient media run by a handful of moguls and robber-barons, can keep us all in debt to the banking system and under the heel of an alien freemasonry.

A man like Harry Patch knew the terror as well as the meaningless of war.

he knew that whilst the politicos preach the "brotherhood of man" they send of young men to kill others and die for the politicos petty war games and business cartels.

yet still the Gordon Browns, Tony Blairs, Geoff Hoons and all the other lying bastards - with full pockets! - have the brass neck to waffle on about "democracy."

To return to a favourite theme of mine just last week the war criminal Geoff Hoon prattled on, on the BBC's Question Time programme about protecting citizens. I think one of the Milliband brothers did the same the other week too (on the Andrew Marr Show... anyway, you get the idea).

How about protecting us from gun and drugs gangs in multi-culti England?
How about protecting us from stabbings and muggings in multi-ethnic inner cities?
How about protecting our ancient rights from prying bureaucrats in all levels of government?

or does this fable of "protecting the citizens" only come into their vocabulary when it's new police powers, new laws, the ever-present "Muslim terrorists" etc. etc.

In 1666 part of London burnt down in a terrible accident. On the official monument in London, it still has etched in the stone that "Catholics" were responsible.

yes - those nasty Catholics back then were the international terrorists out to destroy "freedom" and the secret police were adept at fabricating events, conning the gullible into acts, and torturing the innocent into lurid confessions. They also had a compliant Jewish print media on hand to embellish all kinds of rumours and propaganda against the 'terrorists' of the day...

Not much has changed you see.

Still we have a scapegoat designed to keep a corrupt 'elite' in power; still we have a foreign 'terror' threat to take our eyes off the threats to our own liberties at home (to protect us of course!).

As the last soldier of WW1 dies the same platitudes are read out by our politicians.

Will we ever learn?

Monday, 13 July 2009

Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle Convicted

If anyone thinks I was 'over the top' in recently denouncing "7/7" and the whole "war on terror" conspiracy debacle, note that the government offers up a "counter-terrorism" expert.

I was never aware that holding politiocal opinions or debating history was tantamount to "terrorism."

Is the government, like the Masonic ADL, now saying that anything that questions Zionist power, Zionist war propaganda etc. is "terrorism?"

Have hundreds of years of English legal tradition been flushed away by a system subserviant to a form of political control-freakery responsible for needless wars, mass murder, enslavement to the banks, usury debt, mass unemployment etc.?


BBC Friday July 10

SHEPPARD GETS FOUR YEARS

They looked like a pair of cranks straight out of a Louis Theroux documentary.

One was an unrepentant woman hater whose racist and anti-Semitic views were too hard-line even for the British National Party.

The other, his long-haired sidekick, sought the protection of a pseudonym that he used to make extremist rants.

Their hunger to stir up controversy saw them flee from justice in the north of England and stage an unlikely claim for political asylum in Los Angeles.

But their journey has now ended with jail sentences in the UK.

Jurors at Leeds Crown Court decided neo-Nazis Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were not just harmless oddballs, but dangerous propagandists dedicated to whipping up racism.

On Friday, Sheppard was jailed for four years, 10 months and Whittle for two years, four months.

In a landmark case, they have become the first Britons to be convicted of inciting racial hatred online, having printed leaflets and controlled websites featuring racist material.

'Obnoxious and abhorrent'

The court heard the investigation into the pair began when a complaint about an anti-Semitic comic book called Tales of the Holohoax was made to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool, Lancashire.

It was traced back to a post office box in Hull registered to Sheppard, 51, a former BNP organiser kicked out of the far-right party after he was jailed in 2000 for distributing a racially inflammatory election leaflet.

The spotlight fell on the publishing activities of Sheppard, of Selby, North Yorkshire, a self-styled "scientific publisher", whose online ramblings took in a hatred of women and a morbid fixation with cannibalism.

But a police investigation discovered that his prime motivation was racism and he dedicated himself to producing what prosecutors called "obnoxious and abhorrent'' books, pamphlets and web pages.

What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up
Mari Reid, CPS Counter Terrorism Division

On his website, Sheppard employed Whittle, 42, of Preston, Lancashire, as a columnist under the pseudonym "Luke O'Farrell".

Although their vitriol was variously directed at black, Asian and other non-white people, most of the material shown to the jury was virulently anti-Semitic.

The language and racial slurs used by the pair cannot be repeated here, but some of the excerpts presented to the court offered a flavour of their discourse.

One leaflet claimed that Auschwitz had not really been the location of industrial mass murder but had been, instead, a holiday camp provided by a benevolent Nazi regime for Europe's Jewish population.

Jonathan Sandiford, prosecuting, told the jury that it held up survivors of the Holocaust to "ridicule and contempt", accusing them of lying about the genocide of six million Jews.

Another story was illustrated with photographs of dead Jews. Sheppard also wrote that Holocaust victim Anne Frank's diary was "evil".

Reviewing lawyer Mari Reid, of the Crown Prosecution Service's counter-terrorism division, said members of the public were entitled under the law to hold racist and extreme views.

But she added: "What they are not entitled to do is to publish or distribute those opinions to the public in a threatening, abusive or insulting manner either intending to stir up racial hatred or in circumstances where it is likely racial hatred will be stirred up."

Thrown out

The defence argued that the online material did not fall under the jurisdiction of UK law, because Sheppard's site was hosted on servers in California.

But in a landmark ruling, the judge dismissed this - potentially paving the way for further prosecutions against the owners of other hate sites who believe they are exploiting a legal loophole.

Jurors, too, rejected the defence's claim that the pair's writings were merely satirical.

Sheppard was found guilty of 11 offences and Whittle was found guilty of five offences in July 2008.

Sheppard was found guilty of a further five charges in January 2009.

But the pair were not in court to hear the verdicts against them.

Before the jury in the first trial could return verdicts, both men fled to Los Angeles International airport and attempted to claim political asylum.

But their bid was thrown out by an immigration judge, and they were held at Santa Ana prison in California until they were returned to the UK to serve their sentences.

The irony of two racists attempting to exploit the immigration and asylum system was lost on no-one who followed the case.

Sunday, 12 July 2009

Afghan War: Zionists Sent Our Troops to Die


Afghanistan is a needless, pointless war: as far as we in the UK are concerned.

For the powerful elites in Washington DC and Tel Aviv it's a different mater of course.

So we have to ask ourselves, why should our troops - including teenage boys - be put out as cannon fodder?

It is a Zionist war! We have no interests in it. End of.

When "9/11" happened and America started attacking Afghanistan, with the backing of a supine Westminster regime, some "patriots" immediately supported them.

On the back of the "911" lies they whipped up support for a 'war on Islam' because this was the path they were starting down, a road that would see them marching in step with Neo Cons, Zionists and other enemies of Britain and our interests.

At that time we went against the (perceived!) grain by putting out a colour leaflet (with the popular "US Govt. Under Zionist Control" sticker design on the bottom of it).

I don't have a copy to hand (but I do have one in a file somewhere in the depths...) but the leaflet made circa ten or a dozen key points against the Afghan War, points that could not be denied by any serious thinking nationalist.

It was as a result of this leaflet that the Kosher Patriots back-peddled and changed their story.

"Islamofascism" was still the number one threat (a lie not borne out by subsequent events, especially the global economic crash, caused by Zionist banksters in America -- clearly part of the main threat to our stability and well-being) but they were forced to admit that foreign wars were wrong and that no British lives should be put on the line.

Of course this new line made no sense, because if you really do believe that "Militant Islam" is the threat to world peace, then you would (still) support the war in Afghanistan because our troops are out there fighting Muslims, and Muslims that oppose the New World Order, Israel and the whole package.

I have condemned and exposed (yuch!) David Aaronovitch for his gung-ho approach to the War on Terror [sic], and even he is now trying to water-down his history in these matters (see recent post) but at least he still supports the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (though with tacked-on hypocritical caveats).

Those who back the Neo-Con verbage re. Clash of Civilisations and the War on Terror yet who found it "unpopular" to support the Zionist Wars and so back-tracked are even worse, because they do not even have the courage of their own convictions!

Those of us who saw through 911, who have always condemned militant Zionism as the threat to world peace, who have always pointed to he Zionist role in usury-banking as the threat to lives, homes, jobs etc., those of us who have condemned the ghost-outfit Al Qaeda as a CIA set-up etc. etc. have no such qualms.

Not one British, not one European (yes... not even one American!) life should be put on the line for illegal, Zionist wars.

It is as simple as that.

But in opposing British involvement in foreign wars, we must join-the-dots.

If we oppose Zionist Wars we must oppose the entire War on Terror.

To do otherwise is to excel in hypocrisy.

The family of each and every dead and maimed soldier deserve better than that.




I believe this video deals with the time when our own 'Mid East Envoy' was one Lord Levy! The man of the peerages for cash scandal: Lord Cashpoint himself.

Now ask yourself this: who runs the "free world" [sic]; who runs the banking system; who runs Hollywood; who runs the media.

Muslims?

Er.... no.

Friday, 10 July 2009

Journalists Who Argued for Illegal Wars Should Face Trial


There is hypocrisy and there is bare-faced cheek... then there is something more.

Right: Like all court historians and journalists Aaronovitch earns his shilling by attacking the enemies of his masters. As well as defending illegal Zionist wars across the Middle East -- yet not wishing to put himself on the front line! -- he also produced this tome, which wraps up real history with crank history, so any idea of "Zionist power" is as 'crazy,' in his works, as Dan Brown's gnostic theories.

The Jews have a word for it: chutzpah [drop the c and you've pretty much got the phonetic pronouncement].

Chutzpah is when someone kills your mum, makes you pay them for the coffin and then comes round every day to help you spend your inheritance on items which they then walk off with... only to sell back to you at a later date at an inflated price on HP which you can by then ill afford, only to repossess your house for your failure to keep up the HP payments. he'd probably then offer to rent your ex-home to you at twice the going rate.

Our politicians are quite good at chutzpah. So were the banks (sub-prime mortgages etc.). So are quite a few media talking-heads.

Imagine Tony Blair, invader of Iraq and co-author of the "War on Terror" stitch-up being made the Mid East's "peace envoy."

That's chutzpah.

OK, you can put your note books away now. Lesson's over.

Last night on the BBC's Politics Show I witnessed possibly one of the worst cases of chutzpah in recent months.

A journalist said that we do not want to be in Afghanistan, but now there we must see it through.

Nothing strange there as a few politicos (e.g. a Lib Dem -- who have been critical of recent wars -- on the BBC's Question Time said much the same last night).

However when you think of how said this particular statement (i.e. we should send in more troops though we may not like it) you realise how we are being spun yet another line by a bunch of apologists for mass murder who care not a jot how many body bags come back to be saluted by the population of Wootten Bassett as they pass through in yet another flag-draped funeral cortage.

You see the reporter in question was one David Aaronovitch.

"Who he?" you might ask.

Well, the reporter tends to work for The Independent, and when the whole "9/11" and "War on terror" mess was being rolled out to a credulous population, Mr. Aaronovitch was the key 'left-wing' cheerleader for the Zionist policy of war against Afghanistan, Iraq and anyone else that America-UK-Israel deemed a "threat."

When we were all smelling a rat with the Zionists' lies, half-truths and war propaganda, Mr. Aaronovitch was out there in media land banging the drum for Bush and Blair.

Many journalists, talking heads and "experts" (all of which labels could have been applied to Aaronovitch at the time) take the shilling off the spooks (MI6, CIA or Mossad) and are used in that respect. They are put about the TV studios to give the spin their paymasters want on any given situation.

if you have ever read any serious book on the spooks you will know journalists, professors and similar are often kept on the payroll for such situations.

After all - why risk any free-thinker or someone hostile to their agenda getting the limelight (though this happens of course) when you can at least try and balance up the odds more than a little by employing X number of "experts?"

Now I do not know Mr. Aaronovitch (I'll take that as a badge of honour!) but his gung-ho approach to the "War on Terror" and his backing of a seemingly "right-wing" Neo-Con series of adventures had all the hallmarks of being a service to his paymasters.

After all, he can't have won many fans in the left-wing, Independent-reading luvvie circles he would normally associate with.

As an aside we should always remember that it was to Mr. Aaronovitch that Mr. Griffin announced that his mission to "turn around" the BNP was going to be a stage-by-stage affair (he likened it to turning around a sea-going super-tanker, i.e. it would need a very wide arc and be a slow process).

Why would a left-wing ultra-Zionist give such an open forum to one of the supposed "fascist" opposition, with all its cosy talk of waiting at stations, popping in the butchers, genteel car rides et al? After all, there is no such thing as a free lunch (also enjoyed if I recall correctly).

But back to business.

Does the warmongering Zionist apologist for Cheney, Rummy and Bush really think we have such short-term memories? I may forget where I put my keys on an almost daily basis... but I tend to remember the low-lives who made all the excuses for a needless Zionist war in the UK media: and it would be hard to forget the central role undertaken by Mr. Aaronovitch.

There is bare-faced cheek and then there is chutzpah.

Mr. Aaronovitch knows what chutzpah is, and not just because he is a well-educated (I don't know where he went to school, but I'll bet it wasn't a local run-of-the-mill affair!) astute journalist.

I also do not know if Mr. Aaronovitch has ever lived in the illegal bandit-state that is the cause of so much of the Neo Con's (oxy-)moronic philosophy and warmongering, though the truth of the matter is of course that he has the "right" to "return" there (unlike all the Palestinians forced out via ethnic cleansing, state-sponsored terrorism and all the rest of it).

In stating that we may not want to be in Afghanistan, but must now get on with the job Mr. Aaronovitch is rubbing our nose in the Neo-Con fecal aftermath.

He did want us out there. He did make excuses for the warmongers. He did want our troops used as canon-fodder for a Zionist policy that would result in yet more terror (CIA-inspired or copycat).

If and when war crimes trials are held for Afghanistan and Iraq -- as they surely must if we live in a free and fair world (I know, stop laughing) -- just as they were for the Germans and Serbians amongst others, then I hope the role of bought-and-paid-for politicians and journalists will be at centre stage.

After all if the "I was only following orders" defence was of no use in the quasi-Soviet show trials of 1946, then they cannot be used to dodge the death penalty (aw... go on!) when Blair, Bush, Rummy, Aaronovitch and their ilk are in the dock.

Now... where did I put my keys.


Link:
Ex-Communist Aaronovitch Attacked AntiWar.Com

Aaronovitch Supported Iraq War and Israel's Gaza War Crimes

Thursday, 9 July 2009

9/11's 'War on Terror' Delivered the Police State


If anyone thinks the "War on Terror," "Al Qaeda," "9/11," "7/7" and all the rest of the awful Americanisms so bandied about by our willing media (BBC, Murdoch-owned and other) were just good v. bad, or simple aspects of a naturally occurring 'terrorism' they are fools at best, willing dupes or just plain evil opportunists at worst.

World Zionism, Global Freemasonry, the New World Order... call it what you will: it has organised, cajoled, used agent provocateurs, whipped up a scared, compliant or ambivalent media.

Think I'm wide of the mark?

Watch this week's Panorama (still on BBC i-player) and you will see how we have become a very real police state with all kinds of legal demonstrations and justifiable political campaigning all but labelled "terrorism" with the knee-jerk ill thought out "anti-terror" legislation, blindly accepted by our money-grubbing politicos, used to scare, frighten, silence and otherwise target legitimate campaigners.

Since when does the state have the right to take the picture/video and name/details of every single person on a legal demonstration (as I know from one National Front friend they did a couple of years back as NF members disembarked from a coach).

We live in a police state.

That is what 9/11 and all the rest of the nonsense was all about.

And as more body bags come out of Afghanistan as we, the new Soviets, fight the Mujahadeen 1.2 we are still told we are fighting for "democracy" and even "wymmins rights" in Afghanistan.

That must be why we invaded Burma, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... and all the other nations that use lethal force against their own people and neighbours in contravention of international law.

So please, fellow nationalist, open your eyes.

See beyond the media headlines. See through the "patriots" who serve the NWO agenda by trying to ally us with Israeli interests. See past the "War on terror" claptrap and the lies that our countrymen are dying in Afghanistan to "defend us" or "defend democracy."

We are being ushered into a police state. The "Al Qaeda" bogeyman has been used to silence those who protest against new labour, big business - and much more.

Anti-terror legislation was used to freeze Icelandic assets when the whole 'Credit Crunch' hit.

Now Panorama makes it clear that as well as the whole DNA database scandal and the government's attempt to keep a database on all our children, the police are now keeping all info on any innocent, law-abiding demonstrators for many years.

The Credit Crunch began when Zionist bankers and shysters in America started profiteering from poor communities by charging exorbitant rates of usury even beyond the "accepted norm."

The "War on Terror" started because our Zionist masters wanted "the West" to become far more active in the Mid East for Israeli interests, as well as enabling them to push through scandalous legislation such as the "Patriot Act" [sic] to spy, keep records, and silence more of us.

Quid Pro Quo, mon ami, Quid Pro Quo.

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

BBC Attacks '7/7' Truth-Seekers


Last night the BBC (which we used to fondly call Blair's Bolshevik Corporation) ran a part of its series The Conspiracy Files (Series Two).

It dealt with what has annoyingly (and Americanly!?!?) been labeled "7/7" - aka the "Muslim Terror Bomb Attacks in London."

The programme dealt primarily with a video called "7/7 The Ripple Effect" which we've linked to on the next post so you can go see it yourself.

Interestingly The Ripple Effect Video (TRE) has as a main part of its thesis that BBC is used and abused by the security services to disseminate lies about 7/7 and the whole "War on Terror" debacle.

Lo and behold the BBC spends an hour attacking TRE and those who have loosely coalesced around it.

The BBC "discovered" the man behind it (who gave them that info? MI5?), a man who is now in jail in Ireland awaiting extradition.

Another "doubter/revisionist" was smeared because he wrote a piece "denying" the holohoax.

It all smells of the usual fayre dished up by the Neo-Cons, BBC, government and spooks.

They pull apart small parts of TRE whilst ignoring some key issues (not least the fact that 3 of the "suicide bombers" were reported as being shot by the spooks at Canary Wharf!!!).

Still the BBC in being forced to come to the aid of their political bosses have highlighted TRE and will have ensured that hundreds of thousands more look up the video online.

Any nationalist who thinks the spooks are not capable of setting up patsies and setting off their own explosives are at best naive.

Watch TRE (linked below) and watch the BBC's The Conspiracy Files (available on iplayer at the BBC website) and think for yourself.

The woman who seems to be the "victims' mouthpiece" who takes the official line thinks it dishonours the dead to ask questions.

This is a line that holohoax officials use.

It is a lie.

The dead are dead. If anything, asking questions and truth-seeking is to honour them because if there are lies being peddled about how and why they died that dishonours their memory!

If I was murdered and an innocent man jailed for the crime, whilst the guilty walked free I know I would want the facts looked into and the guilty found and dealt with.

We must be free to ask questions, however unpleasant, however unpalatable to the government's pet BBC.

Does the fact that the BBC knowingly and unknowingly employs criminals, paedophiles, drunkards, adulterers and those who uphold bizarre religious (or anti-religious) theories make all their news coverage untrue or unpalatable?

No.

yet we are told that TRE etc. is unpalatable because of its authors religious outlook and one of its supporter's revisionist views on history.

Thanks BBC.

You have merely confirmed that you are a government agency out to smear anything that really looks into the whys and wherefores of the NWO, just as you will not ask the questions about the banking crisis, or the Bilderbergers, who owns the media etc. etc.

It certainly makes the questions over the BBC's reporting of events in Iran fall into focus!

On the programme the BBC reporter bewails that (the "discredited") TRE is "damaging trust in the British government."

Oh boo hoo!

7/7 - Ripple Effect Video

Thursday, 28 May 2009

Muslim NY "Synagogue Plot" is FBI Set-Up

The facts about the recent "planned" attack by four black Muslims on synagogues, etc in NYC are stunning. It was in fact all choreographed by the FBI. And why? Well, Israel does need more military help and lots of money, alright already.

The news media seems to be extremely slow in telling us about the FBI's provocative role here. Gee, I wonder why?

Link:
Bogus Synagogue Plot

Tuesday, 19 May 2009

Tamil Tigers: the Zionist Connection!

What earth-shaking news that the leader of the Tamil Tigers has been shot dead and images of his corpse shown to the press corps.

Imagine my surprise in learning that the dead mastermind of suicide bombing was none other than Burt Bacharach!!!

I just knew there had to be a Zionist connection. ;-)


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com