Neo Cons' Fellow Travellers Moan About FC

Here we go again.

It seems some Zionists and their fellow travellers on Stormfront are moaning about this blog again.

Right: Paul Wolfowitz, one of a breed of arrogant Neo Cons, Banksters and hucksters that have taken our world to the brink of world war and financial collapse. Yet some still fear to mention the Judeo-Masonic nature of civilisation's enemy. They would rather latch onto Sun Editorials and clown-like figures like Abu "Captain Hook" Hamza who are comedy caricatures created by a Zionist media whilst the real criminals make billions and start wars.

Our "crime?"

To support the Palestinian people!

Shock horror! yes our line is that of Nationalism for decades. Our policy is anti-Zionist.

We do not think Israel has the right to exist: it is founded on a falsehood, it was founded by terror and it exists through terrorism, extortion and blackmail.

A sure sign of a Zionist or an Israel-Firster is that whenever you say you support Palestine you become a "muzzie lover."

The difference between us and them of course is whilst we say we don't support Islam (or Hinduism, or Sikhs... etc.) we also say that Judaism is evil, and that the whole worldview of organised Zionism (read Kabbalistic, Masonic etc. etc.) is one of dripping hatred for all things Christian.

We also do not shy away from saying that the main threat historically, currently and in the future comes from Zionists.

Even "Al Qaeda" and "911" have all the hallmarks of the CIA and Mossad.

So to the Zionists we say "blow wind and crack your cheeks" - for the more you wail and bring out the Muslim bogeyman the more you embarrass yourselves and show your Neo Con agenda.

• If you are out to defend indigenous peoples from immigrants - where is your support for the Palestinians?
• If you are out to defend Christianity from those who preach death and hatred to Christians - where are your condemnations of Judaism and the Talmud?
• If you are out to defend British independence/sovereignty - where are your essays detailing exactly who has taken us into needless wars, who started the credit crunch, who the financiers are that create debt and runaway taxation?

Whatever we (you and I, dear reader) think of Islam (personally I look on it as a form of heresy probably created by rabbis to form a secure buffer to Christian expansion eastwards) it is not adherents to that faith, philosophy or worldview that are dragging the world to its knees.

It is the Zionists, Neo Cons, Freemasons -- all following the anti-Christian Talmudist creed -- that run our world.

Who finances the Republicans and Democrats in America? Who will control the next US President -- the "Leader of the free world" -- just as they've had so many others in their pocket?

The Palestinians deserve our support because they are at the sharp end of the conflict. We, Nationalist Christians, have an especial affinity with the Christian communities there (whom we have supported through trade) and who don't want to run the world or invade other countries: they just want their nation back!

Meanwhile those here in the UK who say they defend Christianity (using cheap Neo Con material) would do well to remember that all the Christians in Palestine are Arab and that the Jewish state has made Christian proselytising illegal.

Israel is not our friend. Its illegal nukes are pointed at London, Paris, Berlin etc. It has spied and stolen from America! It has attacked many sovereign nations - including America!

Some say we should only be concerned for Britain. Yet do we not have the right to support a struggle that fits every just concern of nationalists? Especially one which has so many repercussions around the world?

Returning Palestine to the Palestinian people (and remember many Jews lived there in peace before the 40s, just as Jews live in peace in Iran, Egypt and other Arab countries today) will help Asians of every hue realise that they can have justice.

And as we seek to resettle Asians and Africans (not just Muslims!) - in a humane way, with inducements, grants, educational and other endowment packages etc. - what better way to show that we have the best interests of every people (as we put the interests of our own peoples first in these isles!) than to settle the Palestinian question in favour of the aggrieved party?

G.K. Chesterton once said that the nationalist loves his own country whereas the Imperialist wants to invade/harm his neighbour.

Not content with seeking to drag Europe, the Americas and elsewhere to their knees, the Neo Cons, Zionists and Masons (through Capitalism, Revolution and Banking) have sought to use ridiculously flimsy excuses (historically* and religiously**) to occupy a land owned by a people -including many Christian communities that had lived there since the time of Christ- to satisfy their own political aims.

We will not drop our support of the Palestinians to get an easy ride from Freemasons, Neo Cons or their fellow travellers who are busy wrecking our world.

The Zionist trolls on Stormfront should get over it!



Link:
Zionists Attack FC, Nationalists Defend FC


*Historically: because most Jews are descendants of converts from Khazaria, centuries after the birth of Christ. They are not even Semites (as the Arabs are) but are a Tartar people. There is a Jewish autonomous reason is Eastern Russia where they would feel more at home!

**Religiously: because even if racially they were "linked" with Palestine, since the Jewish people say they were promised the land by God, since they broke their covenant with God by crucifying His Son they have no "God-given right" to Palestine (unlike the Christian Palestinian communities).

Zionist Political Blackmail

I found these great cartoons on Sabbah's Blog.

They say a picture speaks a thousand words and these surely do!

Enjoy...


Are the Zionist trolls visiting this blog getting all hot and bothered?


Oooh!

The Neo Cons on Stormfront will be apoplectic with rage!

How dare we attack their beloved Israel?

Zionist Numbskulls Infest Stormfront

It seems the Neo Con BNPers are taking offense at our link to ILovePalestine.com

They have been huffing and puffing like latter day Colonel Blimps on Stormfront that we are all "Muslim lovers."

This kind of mind-numbingly puerile Sun editorialising should be beneath Nationalists - but then we are dealing with people who have been spoon fed the BNP's "Most Zionist Party" line for years.

There is a link to the first numbskull to draw attention to our link at the bottom of this post. Here is an FC response on Stormfront to an NF member that hit back by drawing attention to all the Zionist and pro-Israel links on the blogs of BNP officials:



EXACTLY!

Because those people are hypocrites who give explicit or implicit support to the Terrorist Bandit State of Israel! Furthermore many of them are bankrolled or supported by Israeli interests.

The New-BNP is Neo-Con in all but name.

remember a Jewish source said that the BNP was the "Most Zionist Party" in the London Mayoral elections?

We link to a pro-Palestinian site because we are PRO-PALESTINIAN.

Nationalism always was, and nationalism always will be anti-Zionist. If you are anti-Zionist ipso facto you are pro-Palestinian.

You might moan about Islam [btw we support the Palestinian Christians - morally and through trade] and Muslims but answer me this: How can any Arabs in Palestine be a "threat" to the UK.

Would you rather Arabs in their homelands or here?

And before you say the same for Jews - Israel isn't their homeland. Read the Thirteenth Tribe. They have Kahazaria, they have a Jewish State in Eastern Russia... and they have New York!

Supporting Palestine is a moral imperative for any nationalist.

Not to support Palestine is the sign that you are being brainwashed by a Neo-Con agenda.

If you don't like what we do then go visit all the Jewish, Talmudic and Zionist sites that the various Neo-Con BNPers and their fellow-travelers link to.

A Palestinian in Palestine is fighting the same enemy that's dragging our country to its knees: the same force that runs Hollywood, the banking system, Big Business etc. etc.

Are you fighting it too? or defending it?

Therein lies the problem: if you don't know your enemy - how can you possibly oppose it?

FREEDOM FOR PALESTINE!

Link:
"amy bnp" posts on Stormfront

BNP Mouthpiece Purging the Droid Calls for Non White Members

On Stormfront the FC supporter (thanks!) and SF user 'Tactics' has exposed the BNP's official Stormfront mouthpiece "Purging the Droid" as agitating for non-White members of the BNP.

Right: Potential BNP supporter?

Once upon a time people thought that Purging the Truth was either Tony "will you kill a government minister for me" Lecomber or Patrick "vote for this coloured gent and not the BNP" Harrington.

The folks over at North West Nationalists blog stated recently that Purging the Haemorrhoids was actually ex-NF activist Phil Andrews - someone who is involved in anti-racism, multi-culti community politics and, so folks say, is married/involved with a non-White.

We don't know for sure if Purging the Racialists is/was Phil Andrews. Some also thought it was Nick Griffin himself under an invented persona, but that's quite unlikely.

Whoever Purging the Facts was/is, the fact remains that someone very close to the BNP leader, someone who enjoyed 'purging' BNP members who opposed Griffin and/or the Griffin-line on Stormfront, and someone who posted BNP policy on Stormfront has been outed as a convinced multi-culti race-mixing loon.

Smell that?

It's coffee.
Time for some people to wake up and smell it too!


Link:
Stormfront forum Griffin thread Page 90

'Blackburn Terrorists,' False Flag Ops and Useful Idiots

How astonishing to hear that another man - in Blackburn - has been arrested for allegedly conspiring to kill government ministers.

Right: Patriots are being ushered down a road, in a distinctly Neo Con direction, which has various destinations including ID Cards, police powers of detention and much worse. WAKE UP WHITE MAN!

I can almost hear the screeches and wails of the Neo-Cons and their fellow travelers at this very moment.

No doubt Stormfront and various forums will be inundated with posts from the ignorant, the brain-washed and the "useful idiots" of Tel Aviv.

When asked what he thought of dangerous extremists who plot to kill our "democratically elected" (yaaaaaawn) leaders, BNP top honcho Tony Lecomber was unable for comment.

Stormfronters Vote AGAINST Nick Griffin

Stormfront members turn against Griffin.

In the UK section of Stormfront, whose moderators have been known to shut down debate and silence critics when it comes to Nick Griffin and his control of the BNP, it seems that anti-Griffin forces have become strong enough to outnumber those in favour of Mr. Griffin.

This is quite an event as hithertofore Stormfront UK was known for being so packed with Griffinites and cronies as to make it pretty useless as any form of debating chamber.

Quite a few Stormfronters were even kicked off for being stridently against Mr. Griffin, whilst moderators often turned a blind eye to those who broke the rules in their defence of the BNP boss.

No doubt the BNP will say this vote means nothing, but we all know that the BNP leadership regard Stormfront as important enough to spend their own time in there arguing their corner, and getting their sycophants to be moderators.

It is symptomatic of a general turn (in wider nationalist circles per se) against Mr. Griffin's leadership of the BNP by many "hardliners" and even "liberals" on the matter of BNP finances and immoral/illegal behaviour in the upper strata of the BNP.

It has been interesting to see various puff pieces in the London and general media for the BNP in London and the South east, as if some people out there have a vested interest in propping up the current BNP leadership and helping their chances of a good vote in the London Assembly elections which, amongst much else, will effectively kill off the 'Enough is Enough rebellion' (that some say has already run out of steam).

Conspiracy theorists are already having a field day: is this the "Barbara Amiel effect" of a proto-Zionist BNP getting an easy ride from what should be an enemy media?

Time will tell.


The Stormfront UK results (sent into FC by email):

For record purposes, the final tally - JB wins by 72 to 60

---

Nick Griffin

.:.BNP.:., amy_bnp, aussie_lad, barrow, BILDERBERG, Bluenose1957, Bob Blatchford, bozley, Brighton Rock, british fascisti, CELTIC STORM, cymrubach, Daffy duck, Definite_Article, demo079, Eastman, essex girl, FBtheC, fraser, Fyrdist, Green Arrow, independant nationalist, Irish=White, JOHN OLDHAM ENGLAND, JohnJoyTree, JoinNewBritain, Knave, Krux, List, London_Brit, Lord Kitchener, loyalandtrue, MattP100, MB, Momofsix, Mrehomme, MrRS, MyEngland, nf essex, Nightshade, Norvic, PaganBrit, paganwarriorUK, Richard L. Lee, Saddleworth Historian, Shove The Dove, StGeorgeIsCross (Sid Williamson), The Boatman, ThePotatoWarrior, This England, TYPSY MAN, Viking Invasion, Walk towards the light, White Pioneer, white power uk, white-man, WhiteMakesRight, whitey1966, white_man_marching, young soldier

60 [45.45%]

____________


Jack Black

Aistulf, always white, Andy Ritchie, Anglezarke, Another Day, BARTXX, Brighton Pebble, Brit Dave, BritishPatriot, bulldog 69, Caradoc, CleanseByFire, CooDayTar, decker, Doriot, Dux90, eddiefrombradford, eurowarrior14, Evaline, Forgotten sister, friedrich braun, G2QD, GeorgeWilliams, Gordon of Khartoum, Grünaugen88, hazardouswaster, HellBilly14, Helmsman, Jack Black, joefrombradford, Karl27, liesbedamned, lowlife, maximilian, Middlesex, Norsepupil, Number Five, nurse1969, Octavian, odinsdaughter, Oldham White, PATRIOT333, Purging The Droid, Radian_Born, raffles, Room 306, Saintrotter, scooterist, Sea Vixen, Seaforth (JiB), sidv, still standing proud, Stilus Virgo, Stockportloyal1690, SuffolkSkin, Svarog, Teardown, the wolf, The_stormer, ThoughtCriminal14, troapler, Uncle Stormy, vanguarduk, ViV, Waterloo, waylon, WhiteChick666, WhiteLight., White_Australian, William Joyce, Window Cleaner, zippy14-88

72 [54.55%]


Voters: 132.

Viva Le Crusties

I support "the crusties" at Heathrow.

Now now - Harry in Glasgow, put that wok down!

Let me clarify my stance.

As you may know a coalition of dole-ite crusties and middle class Guardianistas with too much time and/or money have converged on Heathrow to set up a Camp to campaign against carbon emissions and the British Airport Authority (BAA) who want to expand Heathrow Airport already easily the largest in the UK.

Why do I support them?

Because I believe in the media-presented Global Warming conspiracy? Er... no.

Because I like their heady brand of liberalism, anarchism and socialism? Er... no.

Because I have ambitions to don an Afghan jacket, smoke pot and grow dreadlocks? Er... no.

Now Paul in Birmingham - put that snooker cue down this minute!

No, dear and faithful reader, I'm supporting this mobile circus of the weird and the (hmmm) wonderful because I think the idea of another runway at Heathrow is out of order.

The middle class and government ministers who nod sagely at Global Warming conspiracies are the first to jump on a plane to go skiing or zip off to the Bahamas.

The government promised no extension at Heathrow - and yet it's now going ahead.

The people I feel most sorry for are those who live and work near Heathrow. They have to put up with the noise, the traffic jams and much more.

I think BAA are just out to increase profits by building yet more shops and arcades around another runway and terminal, and no thought is given to the locals who suffer the noise and congestion.

If another runway is really needed, why not look at airports further afield? Let's spread the infrastructure around a bit...

In a recent debate on Stormfront one of my colleagues got into an argument with a typical nationalist... but who was taken in by the kind of propaganda the Guardianistas at Heathrow will espouse.

He said (after someone attacked homosexuals for not being normal and procreating) that there were "too many people in the world."

Nonsense of course. Our people and continent iare slowly aging and DYING!

The truth is that there are too many people crammed into the cities - especially the huge conurbations in and around the M25, in the Midlands and in the ex-industrial Lancs/Mancs area, plus in the Central Belt of Scotland.

Of course there are also millions of immigrants flooding in - and these tend to head to these large conurbations too.

And so we have people crammed inside the M25, with immigrants being poured into that area, and now they want another runway to add to the traffic chaos.

Anyone who's sat in the car park known as the M25 in the West London/Heathrow area anytime between 8am and 10am or 4pm and 6pm will know that the infrastructure there is almost at bursting point.

So I hope the crusties at Heathrow give BAA a bloody nose (BAA can afford it!) and if in the meantime it rains a little heavier on the Guardianistas and the "security forces" dealing with this "threat" then no harm done...

By the way, some ask what the Third Positionist answer is to the urban sprawl of London and similar places, so here's how I see it:

1. Let the many immigrants there sell their homes and keep the proceeds, to use in resettling them overseas. The country (free from usury-debt) can easily afford to let them do this - and if a glut on the market happens, local authorities or government can buy the houses. It will certainly help our children and grandchildren actually afford homes (coupled with non-usurious loans).

2. The large agri-business and absentee landlord estates (owned, for example by huge multi-national insurance companies and the like) can be bought up and/or seized (dependent on circumstances etc.). Then, bit by bit these can by split into small holdings with a house and a few acres for crops/orchards/livestock etc.

3. No new housing estates should be built. No more Lego homes sprawling across our land, in "green" or "brown field" sites.

4. People who want to live in the cities and towns can buy the homes left empty by the immigrants who are free to pocket the money.

5. A programme of demolishing hideous housing estates or breaking them up to include more parkland and allotments within them, plus building farmhouses and outbuildings for small holdings will inject money and work into the economy.

6. With more families back on the land, with their own land to raise food, animals etc. the nation will become far more self-sufficient (this can, of course, be supplemented in the modern world by the promotion of "work from home" initiatives - further cutting congestion, and greenhouse gases for Friends of the Earth commissars looking in).

7. This will also revitalise the market towns of the Shires, and reduce the need for juggernauts shifting chemical crap from one end of the country to the other. More local produce at local farm markets, shops etc. will please the greens.

With the cities cleaned up and more parkland and clean public transport made available, and the countryside brought to life by a network of small holdings accompanying existent working farms, will bring back the balance to the land: with people back in touch with the land, healthy food readily available, and far healthier families and children as a result.

I think with financial reward given to those who chose to raise larger families and incentives to farm the land, we will see a healthy growth in rural schools and rural communities, real communities not half of the houses empty holiday homes and not most of the land owned by agri-businesses and absentee landlords.

Some will call it a dream. It is. But it's no utopia... it will mean hard work for all involved, but the rewards personally, for the families, for the communities and for the nation will be huge.

We either aim to achieve our dream or we dread to live in their nightmare.

On the news today it says schoolkids in London are having uniform bought for them, by worried parents, which include the anti-knife material Kevlar.

Anyone who saw Panorama last night on the BBC (showing the knife and gun crime amongst Blacks in London) has no excuse anymore. There is no burying your head in the sand.

The nightmare is just around the corner as our people live in towns and cities where more of this crime, if not already present, is fast spreading...

Which future would you rather?

Attacking Capitalism

What is Nationalism?

There is a post on Stormfront at the moment (NPD Show the Way: Anti-Capitalism) in which having an anti-Capitalist stance is defended by an FC activist.

What is shocking is the number of people out there - let's call them 'patriots' - who believe that we should defend Capitalism, or at best have some kind of 'national Capitalism' possibly with safeguards etc.

One gent said that taking an anti-Capitalist line would appear to voters as being Socialist or left-wing.

Obviously there are 101 comments that can be made and Ranting Ron himself could have a field day. But here are a few of the more choice points to be made:

1. Capitalism is wrong. It was bad for our people long before it dictated that mass coloured immigration was acceptable to keep wages down.

2. Opposition to Capitalism needn't mean Socialism. Socialism is a discredited stance and there is a nationalist opposition to Capitalism which doesn't believe in centralised government control of every facet of our lives.

3. "National" Capitalists' home is the Tory Party. Albeit that the Tory Party today is (like virtually everything else) internationalist, there is a wing of the Tories which favours "Keeping jobs in Britain" and having some kind of controls over the extremities of Capitalism (e.g. a Blairite "minimum wage").

4. Ignorance is no defence. If you, as a patriot, are unaware of non-Socialist opposition to Capitalism it does not negate those viewpoints; and if you are aware of them, then it is your duty to inform people ("voters" or not) of a nationalist alternative.

5. Distributism has been espoused by nationalists. From members of the BUF in the thirties, through the NF of the 80s to members of the BNP today. Many are aware of Distributism, e.g. in a recent BNP paper it said the Distributist Hilaire Belloc was one of their 'forebears.'

6. To fail to oppose Capitalism is wrong. Not only morally, economically or ideologically. It is wrong because you will fail to pick up support from radical elements who can be "won over," you will fail to give workers, mortgage-payers an answer to their 'shackles' and you will fail to give any vision of the future that any myriad of Capitalist or Socialist groups can - because anyone can "tinker with the works."

Capitalism was alien to our people when they were herded into factories, mines and sweatshops.

Capitalism was alien to our people when their lands were enclosed.

Capitalism was alien to our people when they were sent overseas as indentured slaves.

Capitalism has bled countless generations of our people to death, has forced them to live in slums, has forced them to be taxed to death, forced them to work in monotonous meaningless jobs, mortgaged them to the hilt...

Capitalism bred the non-answer Socialism through its maltreatment of people. Of course then we get into the whole conspiratorial view of history - with bankers funding Bolshevist revolutionaries etc. etc.

Capitalism was wrong long before the British government was forced to pass the Poor Act.

Capitalism was wrong long before the profiteers of the Napoleonic Wars.

Capitalism was wrong long before the advent of mass coloured immigration.

I recall a radio phone in with an activist with Oldham NF in the mid 1980s on Manchester's Piccadilly Radio. On that programme he attacked Capitalism and outlined the nationalist alternative.

One thing he said caught my imagination back then as a young activist and has remained with me ever since.

He said (to paraphrase) that if we got rid of all the coloured immigrants tomorrow, we'd still have White dole queues.

Nationalism is all about love of people, land and all that is good.

Capitalism is all about love of money, profits and anything that will deliver either.

A Nationalist cannot have two masters.