Tip of my Charles I-era foppish wig to Thought & Action for this one.
I normally plonk quotes of the week in the side column, but this one is just too darn big, so here goes lifted straight from the aforementioned blog of good repute... Rumour has it this is going to be the foreword for the next BNP manifesto. Kerching!
Codreanu wrote the following
with Romania in mind but it can be applied to your Nation also:
“Democracy breaks the unity of the
Romanian people, dividing it into parties, stirring it up, and so,
disunited, exposing it to face the united block of the Judaic power in a
difficult moment of its history.
This
argument alone is so grave for our existence that it would constitute
sufficient reason for us to change this democracy for anything that
could guarantee our unity: namely our life; for our disunity means
death…
Democracy is incapable of
continuity in effort. Divided into parties that govern one, two or three
years, it is incapable of conceiving and accomplishing a long range
plan. One party nullifies the plans and the efforts of another. What was
conceived and built by one today is demolished next by another.
In a country in need of construction,
whose historical moment is that very construction, this drawback of
democracy constitutes a threat. It is as if on a farm the owners would
change yearly, each coming with different plans, doing away with what
the predecessors did, their work only to be done away with by the next
owner coming tomorrow.
Democracy
makes it impossible for the statesman to do his duty. A statesman of
the greatest good will becomes, in a democracy, the slave of his
supporters; he either satisfies their personal appetites or they destroy
his backing. The statesman lives under the tyranny and permanent threat
of the electoral agent.
He is
placed in the position of choosing either the renunciation of his
lifetime’s labour or the satisfaction of his supporters. And then the
politician satisfies their appetites; not out of his pocket, but out of
the country’s pocket. He creates jobs, positions, missions, commissions,
sinecures, all of them loading down the national budget which burdens
more and more the ever more bowed backs of the people.
Democracy is incapable of authority. It lacks the power
of sanction. A party, for fear of losing its supporters, does not apply
sanctions against those who live through scandalous business deals
running into the millions, through thievery or embezzlement; nor does it
apply any sanctions against political adversaries lest they expose its
own shady deals and incorrectitudes.
Democracy is in the service of high finance. Because of the
expensive system and the competition among various groups, democracy
needs a lot of money. As a natural consequence it becomes the slave of
the great Jewish international finance which subjugates it through loans
and subsidies.”
