UKIP on Portuguese Banks

UKIP Beat the BNP in Oldham East By-Election

UKIP have beaten the BNP in yesterday's Oldham East by-election.

Right: Even a Labour scandal involving "Muslim death threats" and a recent spate of Asian 'grooming' gangs raping primarily White girls couldn't raise the BNP vote.

A few issues arise:

1. This used to be BNP heartland. Didn't the BNP leader himself stand here before? He certainly talked of fighting this by-election, but withdrew.

2. Some say the UKIP aren't nationalist. True. But by the same criteria the BNP aren't nationalist. Both are pro-black, allow queer members etc. Both are anti-EU and talk of 'getting tough' on immigration. The BNP have moved onto UKIP territory not vice-versa.

3. Ipso facto, NG's boring drone of being "the only show in town" and the historically true observation that UKIP never did well outside the Euros looks like it could be dead in the water.

Left: Full colour leaflets, years of campaigning, a household name, and an endorsement from local MEP Nick Griffin - none of this helped the BNP vote. They seem to have run out of steam.

Lazarus Griffin will live to fight another day, the mail-outs and fund-raisers will continue (they have to in this ponzi scheme). But is this another nail in the coffin for the BNP?

Debbie Abrahams Lab 14,718
Elwyn Watkins LD 11,160
Kashif Ali Con 4,481
Paul Nuttall UKIP 2,029
Derek Adams BNP 1,560
Peter Allen Green 530
The Flying Brick Loony 145
Stephen Morris Eng Dem 144
Loz Kaye Pirate 96
David Bishop Bus-Pass Elvis 67
TURNOUT 48pc

Farrage Faces Barroso: You Don't Get It

Barroso is told the true nature of the EU.

If he'd just spell out its Masonic nature, he'd hit the nail on the head:

Party Politics is Money

The BBC's report on the vast amounts poured into the party political machines prior to the Euro Elections shows that the parties are open to abuse.

Who pays the piper calls the tune.

Link:
Party Donations.

Euro Elections: UKIP and BNP advance

Just a quick few lines:

Congratulations to the BNP on their two MEPs.

Interesting to see UKIP beat Labour (as foretold by some and scoffed at by others!).

With Labour collapsing and the Tories not picking up extra votes... it makes politics a little more interesting in the short term at least.

Otherwise there is a clear call by a huge portion of the electorate for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty at least, if not EU membership!

UKIP beating the government drives this point home!

Minor Party County Council Election Results 2009

As of this moment it seems:

BNP: Three County Council seats (with claim of up to 5 Euro seats).
English Democrats: Won Vote for Mayor of Doncaster. No news on County Council seats.
Greens: 12 County Council seats (now on 123 seats).
UKIP: Eight County Council seats (plus claim for Euro Election triumph and beat BNP/Greens at head-to-head votes)
Mebyon Kernow: No update on their site, but they seem to have won 3 seats.

Any news on Socialist or similar parties' candidates welcome in feedback section.


Here's the blurb from the "minor parties sites."



BNP:

The British National Party stands to take at least one European parliamentary seat and has a chance of taking another three, according to a detailed analysis of the local election results across the country.

The BNP’s statistical analysis department has taken all of the available local election results from each region, and combined them to generate an average BNP vote across each region. These figures then provide a basis upon which European parliamentary results can be estimated. (European parliamentary seats are apportioned according to a complicated highest averages system known as the d’Hondt method, which is dependent on the total number of votes a party receives and the number of seats already allocated to that party in the election.)

The analysis of the local election results on Thursday are subject to a number of important caveats as far as the BNP is concerned.

- Firstly, in many regions, elections took place in local authorities which were not traditional BNP territory. For example, the BNP fought seats in the South East which had never been contested before, while in the West Midlands, there were no elections in BNP strongholds such as Stoke. For this reason, the local authority election results will be skewed, but they are the only figures currently available upon which any estimates can be made.

- Secondly, party political choice at local level may not be representative of party choice at national level. There is a strong train of thought which suggests that turnout for the BNP at Euro level is lower than at local level. Conversely, there is an equally strong argument that people who have voted BNP at local level are likely to already feel strongly enough about politics to carry this allegiance through to Euro level. On the current figures, it is impossible to tell which of the two scenarios will play out. Either of them, in any event, do not affect the fact that the BNP has an excellent chance of taking at least one seat in the North West.

- Thirdly, the final Euro tally will be affected by the size of the turnout for the UKIP party. Talked up by the media, it is highly possible that large numbers of people who have voted Tory at local level would have given their Euro vote to UKIP. This will see a substantial UKIP vote, which may affect the ability of the BNP to take seats under the d’Hondt system, even if its vote increases as per the figures below.

With these important caveats in mind, here follows the average local election result for the BNP. The possibility of a win or loss is calculated upon the minimum percentages required for the BNP to place on that region’s list of elected MEPs.

- South West region: Average BNP vote: 6.8 percent. Result: No Euro BNP seat.

- South East region: Average BNP vote: 7.4 percent. Result: BNP vote just below the threshold, therefore no Euro BNP seat. (This result can be affected by the fact that the BNP only fought local elections in many areas which had either never seen a BNP candidate before, or which had no record of previous large BNP votes.)

- London region: Only one local election contested by BNP, vote was 17.5 percent. Impossible to make prediction, therefore must presume no Euro BNP seat.

- East of England (Eastern) region: Average BNP vote: 9.8 percent. Result: BNP vote just below the threshold, therefore no Euro BNP seat.

- East Midlands region: Average BNP vote: 14.3 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat.

- West Midlands region: Average BNP vote: 12.6 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat. (This result could be boosted by the fact that the best BNP-supporting areas in the West Midlands - Stoke, Sandwell, Dudley and others - did not have local elections on Thursday, meaning that large numbers of BNP voters are not reflected in this average figure.)

- Yorkshire & Humberside region: Average BNP vote: 10.3 percent. Result: One possible Euro BNP seat. (This result could be boosted by the fact that the best BNP-supporting areas in Yorkshire - Leeds and others - did not have local elections on Thursday, meaning that large numbers of BNP votes are not reflected in this average figure.)

- North East region: Only two mayoral elections held, average BNP percentage in those two contests was 6 percent. Impossible to calculate on those figures, therefore no Euro BNP seat.

- North West region: Average BNP vote: 13.1 percent. Result: One BNP Euro seat, and possibly two.

It therefore seems likely that that BNP will take at least one European parliamentary seat in the elections. If the local results hold true on the Euro level, it could be more.

In either event, the BNP has now established itself as a national presence, and has become firmly embedded throughout the country as a household name. Membership has increased dramatically during the campaign, and the party is now better placed than ever before to carry on the struggle for the survival of our nation.

English Democrats:

3:15 TODAY: Doncaster elect the country's first English Democrats mayor.

Labour and Tory candidates eliminated after first round.

Davies wins after second round count.
Peter Davies 25,344 - Mick Maye 24,990

The Doncaster free press reported that:

As a true Englishman, Davies celebrated his victory with a pint of foaming nut-brown ale....

Party chair Robin Tilbrook congratulated Peter on his spectacular triumph.

"Peter has done fantastically well, he's fought a great campaign on the issues that really matter.

This is not only a great result for the people of Doncaster - it's a great result for the people of England, too! Peter is now truly the Boris Johnson of the north."

Greens:

In yesterday's county elections the Green Party continued to make steady progress.

The party made its breakthrough onto four county councils - Cambridgeshire (1 seat), Devon (1), Gloucestershire (1) and Suffolk (2).

In Norfolk the Greens held 2 seats and gained 5.

In Lancashire the party successfully defended 1 seat and gained a second. Lancaster Greens also held a city council seat in a by-election, and continue to hold 12 seats on the city council.

Unfortunately the Greens had effectively lost 4 seats before the campaign began, due to council reorganisation and boundary changes (in Eastern and North East regions). The only unexpected loss was 3 out of the 5 Green Party seats on Oxfordshire County Council.

Greens gain most at Labour and LibDem expense

The Green Party ended the campaign with 123 councillors on 42 councils, up from 119 on 41.

Of the Green Party's gains, 7 were from Labour, 2 from the LibDems and 1 from the Conservatives. This too continues a familiar pattern.

The party's steady progress in the 2009 elections was reflected in recruitment, with an 8.5% growth in membership during the six weeks of the campaign.

Greens look forward to the general election

The single most encouraging result was in Norfolk, where the Greens won more votes than any other party not only in the Norwich South parliamentary constituency, but also throughout the Norwich City Council area. This bodes well for the target constituency of Norwich South, which will be contested by Adrian Ramsay, the Green Party's deputy leader and currently leader of the opposition on Norwich City Council.

And in Lancashire, in the Lancaster and Fleetwood target constituency the Greens outpolled everyone except the Conservatives.

UKIP:

UKIP have triumphed in the local elections taking a total of EIGHT seats on Staffordshire, Nottinghamshire, Norfolk and Suffolk county councils and Newcastle-Under-Lyme district council.

The Party has picked up four council seats on Staffordshire County Council as Labour were decimated, losing 29 of their 32 councillors.

The UKIP winners were Derrick Huckfield (Bradwell & Porhill), David Nixon (Cross Heath & Silverdale), Geoff Locke (Kidsgrove & Talke) and Steve Povey (Leek South).

In Nottinghamshire, Labour again got a pasting losing 22 of their 35 seats and UKIP were among the beneficiaries as Rev Tom Irvine won Hucknall. And in Norfolk, Rex Parkinson-Hare took the Yarmouth Nelson and Southdown ward with 779 votes, beating Labour on 702 and the Conservatives on 551. Again, Labour was crushed, losing 19 of their 22 seats on the council.

On Suffolk County Council, UKIP's Bill Mountford will take up his seat on behalf of the residents of Lowewstoft South.

Meanwhile, in the by-election for Newcastle-Under-Lyne, UKIP's David Woolley is the new representative for Wolstanton.

A handful of results from the 594 seats contested by UKIP are still to come in but 57 of the party's candidates, so far, won more than 25% of their seat's total vote. Overall, UKIP took a total of around 350,000 votes at the council elections.

In the 480 seats where both UKIP and Labour contested elections, UKIP took more than 80,000 votes than Labour. And the party also beat the BNP and the Green Party in the majority of seats where they were head-to-head.

The average UKIP vote share in seats where a party candidate stood was almost 16%.

Link:

BBC Web Update (seems a bit wrong on some counts???)

Elections: BNP, English Democrats & UKIP news

Congratulations are due to the BNP for their first ever County Council seat in Lancashire, and also to the English Democrats for winning the vote for Mayor of Doncaster.

The first is a landmark for the BNP and may point to possible seats in the Euros, though electoral "experts" say it's touch and go.

The Eng-Dems vote is a bit of an amazing story, in a town rocked by Labour Sleaze for many years. They as a party are not too dissimilar from the modernised BNP (non-racist, Jewish members etc.), though they stand on a specifically English nationalist ticket.

What is interesting there is that the town's mayor has real power to implement policy, so if the Eng-Dems can keep clear of corruption they could bring about some radical ideas in a local region blighted by Labour rule!

Go on Eng-Dems: usury-free local currency!!! Go for it!

Meanwhile UKIP -- who, as I said previously, if they beat Labour in the Euros could actually oust Gordon Brown and start an anti-EU avalanche -- have said they believe there was chicanery in Thursdays Euro Election, with ballots being folded so that UKIP seemed not to be on the list!

Today the Brown government is in flux with multiple resignations (including one MP standing down, sparking a by-election) on top of a collapsed vote.

Now we have to wait and see if the Euro Election results can oust a deeply unpopular man. If UKIP do beat Labour putting them into third (or even fourth!) place - I hope still on the cards - Brown could be gone, the clamour for a general election will grow (with a chance for more "nationalist" candidates to profit from party political sleaze in certain areas) and the band waggon for a vote on the Lisbon Treaty will simply grow and grow: which will mean more than any councillor seats.

If the UK votes against Lisbon it will blow the Europhiles' ship out of the water!

As arch Europhile Glenys Kinnock moves to the House of Lords to grab more wonga at our expense (after pocketing huge volumes c/o Brussels/Strasbourg!) there would be nothing more fitting than to see her party rubbished by one, no matter its policy faults et al, that stood on a purely anti-EU ticket.

Let the good times roll!


Links:
BNP Lancs County Council Seat
English Democrats Win Mayor Vote
UKIP on Folded Voting Papers

Third Poll Puts UKIP in Front of Labour!

If UKIP push Labour into third place it signifies:

• A growing number of people want us out of the EU!
• A general election is needed immediately.

With a big push, and tactical voting from those who would support other 'anti-EU parties' UKIP might even give the Tories a run for their money.

That is why I have been advocating tactical voting! As a party leader once said, politics is the art of the possible.

Should we be out to secure corrupt politicos their sinecures for the next 4 years and a pension-for-life (whoever they are!) or should this be about shaming the Westminster parties and getting us out of the EU?

I suggest the latter - especially before Turkey joins and we're flooded with more Third World immigrants (with no controls over how many "EU citizens" come here!).

It's now or never to pile on the pressure to get us out!



From today's Times:

The Conservatives drop four points to 30 per cent, compared with the poll three weeks ago. Labour drops nine points to 16 per cent, and the Liberal Democrats fall eight points to 12 per cent. UKIP are the beneficiaries, rising 13 points to 19 per cent, ahead of Labour and the Liberal Democrats. The Greens rise to 10 per cent, and the BNP is up three points at 5 per cent.

Link:
The Times

Esther Rantzen Can't End the Party System!

We can all taste the fact that Party Politics has been heavily wounded by the Expenses-Gate Scandal.

Right: An honest politician... as rare as hen's teeth.

The political class (lawyers almost to man!) know it too. Hence their rush to decapitate the Commons by getting rid of Michael Martin, the Speaker of the House, who had also "wet his beak" (I know... I'm a 'Godfather' fan too!) with public money and then tried to stop all the information being let out under the Freedom of Information Act.

He should have gone a long time ago, but the idea that this will satiate the public clamour is like a three-legged donkey in the Epsom Derby: it's a non-starter.

Politicians are careerists, so the only thing that worries them is losing their careers.

That is why I, and others, have called for the end of the Party System. We don't want appointees hand-picked because of the Union Post they have milked dry over the years, or because of which public school they went to.

Being a 'Oxbridge' old boy shouldn't mean the right to sit in either house in our legislature.

The old "political soldier NF" and later the International Third Position had it right.

We need recallable delegates (from communities, trades etc.) who speak for the people they represent. They're recallable because if they back something immoral, or pocket expenses beyond what is fair and just they are recalled and replaced by the body that put them there!

No political party machinery. No old school tie gentleman's club approach. No dodgy handshake brigade. Actually on the latter I think each 'MP' should be made to take an oath that he does not belong to any secret society, because they undermine every notion of openness and fairness.

I still stand by what I said earlier this week, though it has ruffled umpteen feathers, that to tactically vote UKIP in the Euros and BNP/NF in the locals will further disrupt the established party system in Westminster, but we have to look further than that and not get tied in with more petty party political corruption.

The Party System dives the nation on false Masonic "Left V Right" lines.

We need a system of delegates based loosely on the Corporatist Model of the Christian Medieval European Nations, though obviously brought up to date. Carrying out the wishes of the people, enacting laws within moral norms, answerable to those they represent for all their actions, and drawn from a wide range of areas, professions and outlooks.

I also feel that as well as "geographical" delegates we must have trades delegates.

One of the cornerstones of this is that if you represent the Isle of Wight, you must have been born there or lived in the area for at least 20 years. That will rid us of the curse of the political class flipping constituencies to areas where they may think they are shoe-in.

Similarly if you sit representing transport workers, you must have worked in the transport industry for a minimum of say 20 years.

With these kind of guidelines in place, open accounting, with each delegate being recallable for proven maladministration of his post, then it would return us to a real for of representation - with no hint of "party politics" which splits the nation on artificial lines.

It would also stop non-entity "celebrities" like that harridan Esther Rantzen putting herself forward for office in an area she knows little or nothing about, as if that could solve any of our problems!

Westminster-watchers say we need change.

How about that for real, lasting and meaningful change?

UKIP Poll 17%! Labour Almost in 3rd Place in Euro Elections

UKIP JOINT 2ND IN LATEST EURO POLL

UKIP are in second place, on 17% for the Euro elections, according to a Mail on Sunday poll today.


If more people vote for UKIP in the Euro elections Gordon Brown's party could be pushed into THIRD place!!!

OK, UKIP are a right-wing kosher party - but so are all the other parties outside of the pro-EU Greens/Socialists and some Lib Dems.

Pushing UKIP into second place (and Labour into third) may give us all the opportunity to:

1. Get shot of Brown. This will help put Westminster into even more turmoil and who knows what could result at every level of politics, benefiting "small" parties and local community activists.
2. Agitate for withdrawal from the EU, on a serious "Irish" style footing (not mere populist gesturing).
3. Further argue that people are losing faith with party politics, allowing more of us to agitate for a non-party system, recallable delegates with a fixed wage, guilds and similar anti-party bodies.

If the 5% (or 4% according to a Sun poll) of people voting BNP (at which level they won't get an MEP but merely split the anti-EU vote) switch to UKIP they could even be breathing down the necks of the Tories!

Many will moan that we say vote for a Kosher Right-Wing Multi-Culti corrupt party like UKIP, but there is so little difference between them and the BNP that this is purely a case of voting for who will do the most damage to the Westminster Regime as it stands, and its subservient role to the endemically corrupt Brussels regime.

After all, that outcome could be more seismatic and system-changing than putting in a possible couple of BNP MEPs who would, in all honesty, change nothing about Westminster or the way in which this country is run.

Are we for trying to bring about real change or getting a few people on a gravy train?

Moreover since UKIP employed the EU whistleblower Marta Andreasen to be its national treasurer (and EU candidate), it's clear that UKIP means to clean up its books and send a shockwave into Brussels by sending back the woman the EU Commission feared more than any other.

That's certainly more reassuring than the BNP employing Simon Darby as their national treasurer (following a revolving door scenario of treasurers) given the bizarre allegations that surround his time in the National Democrats and the BNP!

Right: EU whistleblower Marta Andreasen, UKIP EU candidate - set to take the fight back to the corrupt EU Commission.

As such it is now debatable that nationalists should vote tactically (whilst holding their noses in most cases):

• UKIP in the Euros.
• NF/BNP and similar in the locals.

Links:
UKIP on 17%
UKIP Employs EU Whistleblower
UKIP on 15% a few days ago

Polish Planes & Italian OAPs: Britain for the British?

It seems the BNP's main Euro Election leaflet is full of false (perchance Googled!) images of "supporters."

Imagine their outcry if UKIP had pulled a stunt like this?

This comes on the back of one BNP blogger attacking the NF for wanting to wipe out all non-Whites throughout the world, a lie so vast even Searchlies would blush to make it!

We are asked to hold our noses and vote for the BNP whilst they continue to use the most underhand methods and intemperate language against other nationalists.

As the OAPs on their leaflet could have warned them, the Italians say: You cannot be drunk and have a full barrel!


Link:
Collett's Latest Cock-Up

Different Strokes & the BNP = Pressure Valve Politics

This has been taken off the net by one of the folks at North West Nationalists.

Please lick on this and play it whilst you stare in disbelief at the above picture, and read the following text!

First we had Zimbabwean "patriotic Britons" in Cumbria (under the guidance of Martin 'Never Trust a Tory' Wingfield).

Then we had "Purging the Droid" a BNP leader on Stormfront stating that coloureds should be in the BNP.

Next we had multi-culti cavortings in Wrexham (in North Wales where the BNP distro-centre is based) with BNP members "getting down wiv a bruvva."

And now this! (sorry if I missed any)

As we have said countless times, the BNP is nothing more than a multi-culti, race-mixing, homo-ambivalent, Zionist anti-Muslim pressure group designed to make money for its top brass.

Sorry to say this for anyone who believes the spin: but this is pressure-valve politics designed to get nowhere and achieve nothing.

We may as well all vote/join UKIP!

Singalong now... 'Young, Gifted and Black - is where it's at!'

Sri Lankan Goes UKIP to Get British Jobs for British Workers

I think the BNP will be jealous of this, because in truth they would love to have a publicity coup like this!

No doubt they will attack UKIP for"selling out" but this is what the BNP would do (with a non-Muslim natch!) to prove they are not nasty racists or neo-nazis.

British Jobs for British Workers eh?


Link:
BBC News

UKIP's Nigel Farrage MEP Lambasts Gordon Brown for not Saying Sorry

Farrage may be a career politician too, but this is worth watching for the comments on Gordon Brown's sale of the gold reserves if nothing else!

Anti-Muslim Dutch MP Geert Wilders Banned: Should We Care?

So a Dutch "far right" MP has been banned from entering Britain.

Should we care? He's probably a Neo Con, invited by a UKIP member of the House of Lords, it stinks of pressure valve politics wherein the facts of events like "911" are whitewashed in the eyes of the public.

So should we care?

Actually I think we should.

We should care that this government is banning people at a faster rate than ever before (even Europeans who are free to enter the UK whenever they want), and it stinks.

Those who question Islam are banned. Those who question Judaism are banned. Those who question the Holocaust are banned. Soon those who question the "rights" of homosexuals will be banned.

Those who question Christianity... well you can imagine that they don't even make the news, despite occasional demonstrations (like Jerry Springer the Opera).

So I think we should be concerned.

If a Neo Con wannabe wants to sit with a few dozen right-wing Lords and Ladies, invited by UKIP, to show his film - who really cares?

My concern is that the banning of people like Fred Leuchter and Louis Farrakhan are just rubber stamped because the Zionist/Lawyer class who run our Parliament and our Government just keel over to whatever demands the Zionist Lobby makes.

When we hear that Germany and Argentina are pushing for jail sentences against the Bishop who "dared" to question the figures of the Holocaust (I'm not referring to the firestorms of Dresden or Hamburg or the American and Soviet Gulags/Starvation Centres after WW2) we should be worried when people are banned for their views.

It's only a step from banning them to arresting and detaining them - and then to deporting them to police states (like Germany) where their views, whether true or false, sober or nutty, are deemed "illegal" under their bizarre and (to us "Brits") unjust thought-crime laws.

You think our increasingly Zionist "democratic" state wouldn't do that? Wake up and smell the coffee!

Have you ever heard of extraordinary rendition? Our wonderful democracy rolled over and let America ship people around the world to torture centres in some of the most questionable places - all for the alleged "War on Terror" which was launched with the false flag op known as '911.' There is even evidence that some of those illegal and morally repugnant flights touched down on UK soil, so please don't tell me the day is coming when anti-Zionists and Revisionists are shipped off in shackles to Israel or Germany for thoughts or deeds that the Sun and Daily Mail tell the sheeple are "beyond the pale."

The Dutch MP is out to defend liberalism, the rights of homosexuals, the rights of Zionists... but the knee jerk reaction of the British State should let us see past the opinions of a Neo Con fop to the bigger picture.

Discuss!


Link:
Dutch MP Hits Out at UK

Zionist War Crimes: Where's the Anger Mr. Politician?

Just how many war crimes can Israel commit before ANYONE here takes a stand?

You think we don't live in a one party state?

Which party - Lib-Lab-Con-UKIP-BNP - will dare to denounce the Zionist aggression?

The Zionists have banned journalists because they know witnesses scattered around would expose their lies about "Hamas fighters" or "Hamas rockets" at the sites of atrocities, in schools, Mosques, homes etc.

If Jews were dying in this fashion and at this rate they would call it a "holocaust" and Hollywood would have the script-writers in already making another blockbuster. As Kate Winslett's character put it in "Extras" - do a Holocaust film and you're guaranteed an Oscar!

Brown, Cameron, Farage, Griffin, and Mr. Who-he of the Liberals -- all are Zionists to a man!

They all support the illegal Zionist state. They all stand by and say nothing as innocent Palestinians die in their 100s.

Just as none of them will denounce the Rothschilds and others who strangle us with debt and ruin our economy.

Vote for who you want dumb goys! THEY ARE ALL BOUGHT AND PAID FOR WITH SHEKELS!

Shame on all the Lodge members in all the political parties!

No doubt they are all praying for some (Mossad organised/inspired) "terror" outrage in revenge so they can further justify their foppish stance on the worldwide criminal conspiracy known as Zionism.

Wake up White man!

You are being conned. Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, Iran...

These people are determined to wage an endless war, so we always have a bogeyman to help us take our eyes off our crumbling once-Christian civilisation.

Ask not for whom the bell tolls...

BNP/UKIP Agreement Scuppered...

...if it was ever meant to be serious?

Apparently BBC News 24 interrupted its broadcast to "newsflash" that UKIP had denied the BNP an electoral pact for the Euro Elections!

Right: Nigel Farage MEP, the leader of UKIP, beloved of the media. Many allege the well-paid MEP is a state-operative. Meanwhile Nick Griffin the BNP leader is different because... he's not on the EU gravy train.
Could his desire for a shoe-in be behind the failed approach to the group the BNP labeled UKRAP?

Am I the only one to find it highly amusing that the BNP approached UKIP? They have long wailed that UKIP are a "state pressure valve" (pot? kettle?) yet they go running to UKIP like this?

Is the truth that UKIP always out-vote the BNP in the Euro Elections (after all, it's UKIP's natural hunting ground) just as the BNP always out-votes UKIP on a local election level. It's horses for courses.

Of course, the difference is that MEPs get huge wonga whereas councilors get a relative pittance (that is highly comparative for any bank pen-pusher about to become dole-ite looking in!) - and that MEPs get a golden handshake 'pension for life.'

No! It couldn't be?

Are you thinking that the BNP's No. 1 agenda is the acquisition of wonga for the top listed person in their prefered Euro-region? How cynical!

As ex-BNP Councilor Simon Smith states on his brilliant Nationalist Truth Blog:

The BNP/UKIP pact - Big deal. Why haven't the BBC and the rest covered the BNP's internal elections or the "December Rebels ?" What is the agenda ? Perhaps the Establishment would like to engineer a UKIP/BNP type merger ? Just speculating. Ex UKIP Cllr Chris Cooke who has commented on UKIP has said that a couple of government operatives were discovered as such by a privately hired detective and yet still continued to work in UKIP's administration department ! Perhaps a merger would cut down the number of MI5 types necessary and lead to cost cutting that would lesson the requirement for 5IMon Darby types !? :-) Truth is , I don't know why the BNP/UKIP was mentioned - but there is a "News" management agenda here.

With 5IMon Darby having come from the state-infested National Democrats and the Eurosceptic groups run-through with spooks and their operatives we have to look askew at the current lot of "right wing" parties (because they are right wing - not nationalist) as a rum bunch shot through with state policies and state operatives.

Link:
Nationalist Truth on news management

Tory MP Switches to UKIP

In the news today an Essex MP has switched his allegiance to UKIP.

I'll post more news when I can get some free time...

This is very interesting and UKIP become the first non-Tory "right-wing"/Eurosceptic Party to get an MP!

David "call me Dave" Cameron must be livid.