Viva Le Crusties

I support "the crusties" at Heathrow.

Now now - Harry in Glasgow, put that wok down!

Let me clarify my stance.

As you may know a coalition of dole-ite crusties and middle class Guardianistas with too much time and/or money have converged on Heathrow to set up a Camp to campaign against carbon emissions and the British Airport Authority (BAA) who want to expand Heathrow Airport already easily the largest in the UK.

Why do I support them?

Because I believe in the media-presented Global Warming conspiracy? Er... no.

Because I like their heady brand of liberalism, anarchism and socialism? Er... no.

Because I have ambitions to don an Afghan jacket, smoke pot and grow dreadlocks? Er... no.

Now Paul in Birmingham - put that snooker cue down this minute!

No, dear and faithful reader, I'm supporting this mobile circus of the weird and the (hmmm) wonderful because I think the idea of another runway at Heathrow is out of order.

The middle class and government ministers who nod sagely at Global Warming conspiracies are the first to jump on a plane to go skiing or zip off to the Bahamas.

The government promised no extension at Heathrow - and yet it's now going ahead.

The people I feel most sorry for are those who live and work near Heathrow. They have to put up with the noise, the traffic jams and much more.

I think BAA are just out to increase profits by building yet more shops and arcades around another runway and terminal, and no thought is given to the locals who suffer the noise and congestion.

If another runway is really needed, why not look at airports further afield? Let's spread the infrastructure around a bit...

In a recent debate on Stormfront one of my colleagues got into an argument with a typical nationalist... but who was taken in by the kind of propaganda the Guardianistas at Heathrow will espouse.

He said (after someone attacked homosexuals for not being normal and procreating) that there were "too many people in the world."

Nonsense of course. Our people and continent iare slowly aging and DYING!

The truth is that there are too many people crammed into the cities - especially the huge conurbations in and around the M25, in the Midlands and in the ex-industrial Lancs/Mancs area, plus in the Central Belt of Scotland.

Of course there are also millions of immigrants flooding in - and these tend to head to these large conurbations too.

And so we have people crammed inside the M25, with immigrants being poured into that area, and now they want another runway to add to the traffic chaos.

Anyone who's sat in the car park known as the M25 in the West London/Heathrow area anytime between 8am and 10am or 4pm and 6pm will know that the infrastructure there is almost at bursting point.

So I hope the crusties at Heathrow give BAA a bloody nose (BAA can afford it!) and if in the meantime it rains a little heavier on the Guardianistas and the "security forces" dealing with this "threat" then no harm done...

By the way, some ask what the Third Positionist answer is to the urban sprawl of London and similar places, so here's how I see it:

1. Let the many immigrants there sell their homes and keep the proceeds, to use in resettling them overseas. The country (free from usury-debt) can easily afford to let them do this - and if a glut on the market happens, local authorities or government can buy the houses. It will certainly help our children and grandchildren actually afford homes (coupled with non-usurious loans).

2. The large agri-business and absentee landlord estates (owned, for example by huge multi-national insurance companies and the like) can be bought up and/or seized (dependent on circumstances etc.). Then, bit by bit these can by split into small holdings with a house and a few acres for crops/orchards/livestock etc.

3. No new housing estates should be built. No more Lego homes sprawling across our land, in "green" or "brown field" sites.

4. People who want to live in the cities and towns can buy the homes left empty by the immigrants who are free to pocket the money.

5. A programme of demolishing hideous housing estates or breaking them up to include more parkland and allotments within them, plus building farmhouses and outbuildings for small holdings will inject money and work into the economy.

6. With more families back on the land, with their own land to raise food, animals etc. the nation will become far more self-sufficient (this can, of course, be supplemented in the modern world by the promotion of "work from home" initiatives - further cutting congestion, and greenhouse gases for Friends of the Earth commissars looking in).

7. This will also revitalise the market towns of the Shires, and reduce the need for juggernauts shifting chemical crap from one end of the country to the other. More local produce at local farm markets, shops etc. will please the greens.

With the cities cleaned up and more parkland and clean public transport made available, and the countryside brought to life by a network of small holdings accompanying existent working farms, will bring back the balance to the land: with people back in touch with the land, healthy food readily available, and far healthier families and children as a result.

I think with financial reward given to those who chose to raise larger families and incentives to farm the land, we will see a healthy growth in rural schools and rural communities, real communities not half of the houses empty holiday homes and not most of the land owned by agri-businesses and absentee landlords.

Some will call it a dream. It is. But it's no utopia... it will mean hard work for all involved, but the rewards personally, for the families, for the communities and for the nation will be huge.

We either aim to achieve our dream or we dread to live in their nightmare.

On the news today it says schoolkids in London are having uniform bought for them, by worried parents, which include the anti-knife material Kevlar.

Anyone who saw Panorama last night on the BBC (showing the knife and gun crime amongst Blacks in London) has no excuse anymore. There is no burying your head in the sand.

The nightmare is just around the corner as our people live in towns and cities where more of this crime, if not already present, is fast spreading...

Which future would you rather?