Visit the FC Shop!

Wednesday 30 May 2007

Attacking Capitalism

What is Nationalism?

There is a post on Stormfront at the moment (NPD Show the Way: Anti-Capitalism) in which having an anti-Capitalist stance is defended by an FC activist.

What is shocking is the number of people out there - let's call them 'patriots' - who believe that we should defend Capitalism, or at best have some kind of 'national Capitalism' possibly with safeguards etc.

One gent said that taking an anti-Capitalist line would appear to voters as being Socialist or left-wing.

Obviously there are 101 comments that can be made and Ranting Ron himself could have a field day. But here are a few of the more choice points to be made:

1. Capitalism is wrong. It was bad for our people long before it dictated that mass coloured immigration was acceptable to keep wages down.

2. Opposition to Capitalism needn't mean Socialism. Socialism is a discredited stance and there is a nationalist opposition to Capitalism which doesn't believe in centralised government control of every facet of our lives.

3. "National" Capitalists' home is the Tory Party. Albeit that the Tory Party today is (like virtually everything else) internationalist, there is a wing of the Tories which favours "Keeping jobs in Britain" and having some kind of controls over the extremities of Capitalism (e.g. a Blairite "minimum wage").

4. Ignorance is no defence. If you, as a patriot, are unaware of non-Socialist opposition to Capitalism it does not negate those viewpoints; and if you are aware of them, then it is your duty to inform people ("voters" or not) of a nationalist alternative.

5. Distributism has been espoused by nationalists. From members of the BUF in the thirties, through the NF of the 80s to members of the BNP today. Many are aware of Distributism, e.g. in a recent BNP paper it said the Distributist Hilaire Belloc was one of their 'forebears.'

6. To fail to oppose Capitalism is wrong. Not only morally, economically or ideologically. It is wrong because you will fail to pick up support from radical elements who can be "won over," you will fail to give workers, mortgage-payers an answer to their 'shackles' and you will fail to give any vision of the future that any myriad of Capitalist or Socialist groups can - because anyone can "tinker with the works."

Capitalism was alien to our people when they were herded into factories, mines and sweatshops.

Capitalism was alien to our people when their lands were enclosed.

Capitalism was alien to our people when they were sent overseas as indentured slaves.

Capitalism has bled countless generations of our people to death, has forced them to live in slums, has forced them to be taxed to death, forced them to work in monotonous meaningless jobs, mortgaged them to the hilt...

Capitalism bred the non-answer Socialism through its maltreatment of people. Of course then we get into the whole conspiratorial view of history - with bankers funding Bolshevist revolutionaries etc. etc.

Capitalism was wrong long before the British government was forced to pass the Poor Act.

Capitalism was wrong long before the profiteers of the Napoleonic Wars.

Capitalism was wrong long before the advent of mass coloured immigration.

I recall a radio phone in with an activist with Oldham NF in the mid 1980s on Manchester's Piccadilly Radio. On that programme he attacked Capitalism and outlined the nationalist alternative.

One thing he said caught my imagination back then as a young activist and has remained with me ever since.

He said (to paraphrase) that if we got rid of all the coloured immigrants tomorrow, we'd still have White dole queues.

Nationalism is all about love of people, land and all that is good.

Capitalism is all about love of money, profits and anything that will deliver either.

A Nationalist cannot have two masters.

3 comments:

MikeD said...

Much of the confusion on this issue has arisen from the erroneous perception that Capitalism and Socialism are opposites. In reality the differences between the two systems are largely superficial. Both are rooted in materialism and see the purpose of life as nothing more than material gain. Both also concentrate power and wealth in the hands of the few (the state in the case of Socialism and financiers in the case of Capitalism), leaving the mass of people propertyless and enslaved.
There has also been the problem of a lack of ideology within nationalism. After the mass immigration of the 1950's nationalists generally became fixated with race, perceiving it as the be all and end all and largely neglecting issues related to social justice. However, there has recently been some good ideological postings on the Tyndallite "North West Nationalists" blog so hopefully things are beginning to change.

Final Conflict said...

You are right, and this pressure-group mentality has blinded people, as you say, in the matter of socio-economics; but also in matters of morality and the family, foreign policy - and more.
This myopic vision on economics is a replay of all the pro-Capitalist/Free World cobblers we had in the Cold War when some nationalists behaved little better than CIA stooges, which more 'radical' thinkers in nationalist circles such as AK Chesterton [albeit still a product of his era] saw through.

NorthWestNationalists said...

Capitalism is not our salvation;
and we are not the salvation of capitalism !


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com