Visit the FC Shop!

Thursday 5 February 2009

BBC Gollywog Hypocrisy & "Boy George"


An update on the previous story.

The day after the degenerate George O'Dowd (aka Boy George) was convicted and jailed for holding a "Gay" male escort hostage (I didn't read the details, but I understand it was pretty sordid) his music was still being played on BBC radio stations!

Right: Convicted pervert and deranged homosexual 'Boy George' O'Dowd. His illegal and offensive antics have not prevented his music being played on the BBC - from which he earns money.

The BBC is happy to play the music (for which the artists get paid) of degenerate criminals like Boy George O'Dowd and George Michael (arrested for lewd acts and drugs), sending a message to the youth and others that degenerate, illegal behaviour linked with homosexuality and drugs is "acceptable" to the BBC.

Perhaps if the deranged faggot O'Dowd had merely mentioned the word Gollywog, instead of kidnapping and tying-up a homosexual prostitute, his music might be banned from the BBC.

What a mad world.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

"We cannot go on as we are. The B.B.C. defames our past, poisons our present and places our future in desperate hazard. No nation can survive which is conditioned by a vast fifth-column serving forces which have a vested interest in its obliteration as a sovereign, independent realm. There is not much time left ... We say to the the rulers of the BBC - For God' sake, Go!"
A.K. Chesterton - BBC - A National Menace

The institution is a bastion of filth and perversion and is filled to the brim with non-Brits, Marxists, Homosexuals, Feminists and Liberals etc. They cry out that they will be labelled 'impartial' if they showed an advert on their channels for Humanitarian charities acting on behalf of illegally brutalised civilians. However, they don't mind breaking that rule when it comes to shoving Global Warming propaganda and disinformation down our throats every day.

The BBC claims to be impartial but it follows a very rigid ethos.
Its very hostile to patriotism/Nationalism, Christianity, family values, the traditional conservative right, the countryside, Euroscepticism, Britain's past and British values etc. Conversely, it is sympathetic to Labour, European federalism, the state and state spending, mass immigration, minority rights, multiculturalism, alternative lifestyles, abortion, and progressiveness in the education and the justice systems.

So it turns that the British Bolshevik Comintern is not quite what it seems and is far from being 'impartial'!

Another Soylent Green mint wafer anyone?

Anonymous said...

As political arguments go, this particular one is rubbish. Children aren't looking for "messages" from the BBC. They're just listening for a good pop tune. And "youth" certainly aren't listening to artists in their 40s like the Georges; they're more concerned with younger acts like Duffy and Kanye West. When's the last time "youth" turned up in a record shop looking for a copy of Karma Chameleon? Also, I would argue that what Boy George did is reprehensible by any way you look at it, his body of work is of no relevance to his crime. His music is still enjoyed my many, so by banning it, whom are you seeking to punish? The millions who enjoy it? He received money for the work he did; the crime is a separate issue for which is is serving his punishment. I'm not sure why the issue must be confused. As for George Michael, he's only received cautions for what are minor infractions (hence the cautions). I wouldn't even mention him in the same sentence with Boy. But once again, he created this incredible body of work that millions enjoy. Why not let them enjoy it, and let him enjoy the fruits of his labour?

Final Conflict said...

There speaks a typical liberal.

So they aren't "yoof" artistes anymore- therefore it's ok to put out their back catalogue on the BBC after they have been arrested for foul crimes and drugs-related offences???

The BBC is sending a message that degenerate homosexual druggies - one who approaches strangers in toilets and one who kidnapped a male prostitute - are "OK" for the BBC (which is supposed to be a body that we all look up to!) whereas a woman who uses the term Gollywog in a non-offensive, private conversation which is not illegal is "banned."

How do you square that?

To me it seems that the BBC is not only under the thumb of a Pink Mafia - which also allows all manner of foul and degenerate material right across the BBC - but is also politically correct and will never allow anything they deem (wrongly) to be "racist."

This seeps into their news outlets that see anything of interest to pooftahs as "relevant" but anything that comes from the viewpoint of racialists, patriots etc. as a non-story.

usually even when stories like the Gollywog one rear their head the Beeb will bring in two black activists to discuss it.

Like Westminster politics, the Beeb offers dictatorship with the veneer of "choice."

You can listen to any artist you want on the BBC - so long as they aren't anti-immigration, anti-homosexual etc. etc. ad nauseum.

The relevance of the age or popularity of the degenerates promoted by the BBC seems irrelevant to me.

But by your reckoning any faggot, druggie, criminal jailbird can do whatever he/it wants and be allowed on the BBC for people to "enjoy".

Let's see Tom Jones, Huw Edwards or Jeremy Paxman state that the holocaust never happened (not illegal in this country!) and see how long the BBC lets us "enjoy" their output!!!

You see in Soviet Britain liberal platitudes only cover degenerate behaviour and opinions... like yours! ;-)

Pip pip.


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com