Sunday, 22 November 2009

Black British Patriots? The Day Approacheth

The North West Nationalist blog has dug out an interesting article by John Tyndall in which he dealt with the BNP leader's attempts to bring in coloured members (some years ago!)

The article has some other interesting sections, here are the most pertinent bits:

Then when the ink was hardly dry on the June election ballot papers Mr. Griffin put forward a proposal that was certain, had it been carried through, to split the BNP in two. This was his crazy scheme to alter the party constitution to let in non-white members. He only backtracked after massive grass-roots opposition to the scheme had made itself manifest. In a declaration on the BNP website on the 23rd July he announced a complete about-turn, saying that the plan had been abandoned and that the membership rules would stay as they were, employing arguments in support of this that were an almost exact replica of those that I and several others had put forward against the change only a few days previously! This was not leadership; it amounted to a pathetic blowing with the wind.
Notwithstanding this volte face by Mr. Griffin, I am not convinced that we have seen the end of his ambition to bring non-Whites into our party. In statements to journalists he has been confessing his support for the idea for at least two years. I fear that we will witness a replay of the project before very long, albeit perhaps by means of different tactics.


So it was clear to JT that there was an agenda to allow in coloured members, when the BNP had been founded and most of its members believed that it should be run as, an organisation for the 'aboriginals' of these islands.

On working with non-Whites JT states the following (which is exactly the position of the NF of the 1980s and of Third Positionists ever since):
Associated groups
The BNP should be willing to consider schemes of co-operation with non-white ethnic groups towards the achievement of our repatriation programme, but this should not involve granting them any special status with regard to the BNP, whether as party members or in any kind of formal association. I therefore would immediately dissociate the BNP from any groups that have been formed over the past five years which grant such association. This would include the so-called 'Ethnic Liaison Committee' and any others of its kind. If those comprising such groups wish to maintain them in operation, that is their affair. However, they would no longer be permitted any association with our party.
A sensible approach which proves there is no meaningless "racism" at work, simply a respect for all peoples and a desire to have a European Europe. We simply want what the Indians achieved in the 1940s: our own land free of any colonialists.

Then there is another very interesting part of the article in which JT tackles the thorny issue of Islam. This is of great interest to every nationalist (within and outwith the BNP) as the current BNP leadership has seen fit to make Islam its "Great Satan" and in the shadow of this seen an ally in Israel:

The BNP and Islam
I have always been opposed to the current policy of Mr. Griffin of singling out Islam as a special enemy of Britain and concentrating most of the party's fire on that religious creed, rather than dealing with the overall threat of multi-racialism to our country, of which immigrant groups happening to adhere to the Islamic faith are only a part.

If the Middle Eastern and Asian ethnic communities which have brought organised Islam to Britain are repatriated to their ethnic homelands, the problems posed to the country by Islam will disappear. Putting it another way, these problems are not primarily religious but racial.

As long as the Islamic communities are confined to their native continents and countries and do not attempt to impose their religious customs on the people of the United Kingdom, we have no quarrel with them.
There is much for nationalists to take in. But the idea that the EHRC (1984-style Equality & Human Rights Government Agency) had a cut-and-dried case for outlawing any "all White" political party is laughable.

The homosexual ex-NF leader Martin Webster (who has little time for us at FC because of our open policy against homosexuality, its promotion et al) has outlined how the BNP has tried in essence to bamboozle its membership whilst apparently not even attempting to get the advice of a competent legal expert in the field (known as a Counsel's Opinion) without which no reasonable organisation would settle out of court, or cave in to the demands of a Socialist government with a multi-racial agenda (remember that advisers to this government has already admitted that they knowingly let in huge volumes of non-Whites in order to help create an even more multi-culti society, playing politics with our lives, our security, our heritage and our very future).

In short we have the situation where nationalists have to stand back and question those who have tried to make nationalism an anti-Muslim pressure group and are now seeking to implement their long term strategy of creating a multi-culti right-wing "patriotic" party.

The homogenisation of the party political process is almost complete.

All the little pressure valves from the right-wing anti-Muslim party to the left wing global-warming party are in place.

Meanwhile the strides to World Government continue apace with the appointment of a European President.

Welcome to the New World Order! Masons to the fore!

Monday, 16 November 2009

Channel 4's Dispatches on the Israeli Lobby

There's a fascinating Dispatches programme on Channel 4 as I type about the sheer POWER and INFLUENCE of the Israeli Lobby in Westminster.

I'll put a link to it when it is posted on U-Tube.

Will any political party DARE to criticise Israel?

It seems not. The money this lobby wield seems to grease too many wheels!

An apt lessons for all nationalists!

Thursday, 5 November 2009




NATIONAL FRONT REMEMBRANCE DAY
Sunday 8th November 2009
Assemble 2.00pm Bressenden Place (Near Victoria Station)
March Off 2.30pm

Bonfire Night: 1606's Al Qaeda and Masonic Bogeymen


Remember, remember the 5th of November...

In 1605 our very own "7/7" happened long before the advent of the United States, but Freemasonry and its antecedents were very much alive and kicking.

The printing presses of the Zionists (ever keen to spot an opportunity) were pumping out anti-Christian propaganda to be used by one side in an orchestrated civil war of Christendom (in part helping to create the Inquisition myth, the forerunner of the Holohoax).

At home Guy Fawkes and his colleagues, the conspirators of "11/5" (as it would be called today in our sycophantic Americanised way), were as much a creation of the burgeoning 'New World Order' as the much talked-about Al Qaeda today.

Both religious in outlook, both created via justified grievances with the New World Order, both helped in their arming, planning and both used to justify draconian police state measures and to entrench the regimes and bring about a 'fear factor' to make anyone who questioned the regimes, busy overturning centuries of traditions and freedoms, as 'unpatriotic.'

Two key events (organised or started by other forces - accidental and orchestrated) were blamed on these bogeymen of their day: the Great Fire of London (1666) and the Twin Towers (2001) such was/is the hysteria of the day - whipped up by much the same Masonic powers.

In 1605 the regime was no spring chicken, despite having only a few decades of its new Weltanschauung, and realised that the patriotic fervour of 1605 needed corralling.

For the next 250 years Bonfire Night/Guy Fawkes Night celebrations at which various "anti-British" effigies were burnt was an event that was organised by the state. Indeed for those 250 years it was legal prerequisite, by military law, to hold/attend such celebrations in Britain and its territories.

Kind of makes our state-organised 'Welcome Home' events to support the Zionist War in Afghanistan look muted by comparison (and please don't parrot that these are to "support the troops not the war" -- why did the politicians organise them otherwise?).

So 400 years later what have we learnt?

Precious little it would seem. Guy Fawkes and his companions are viewed somewhat romantically by many, but for many more they don't know or care, Bonfire Night being just another event on the calendar to have a beer and a night watching fireworks.

Years from now will Holocaust Day be seen in the same light? Clouded in history, but just another excuse for a special assembly in school and a day-out for local councilors? Another NWO-organised "holiday" to replace the true Holy Days of Christendom that allowed the working man of England (and his kith and kin across Europe) to freely celebrate in what was Merrie England before the New Unhappy Lords held sway?

Michaelmas, Candlemas... will soon be joined by Christmas if the Masonic Overlords and their supermarkets get their way.

In our Brave New World (Order), all will be homogenised to be equal celebrations of diversity, not allowed to impede trade (lest the Financial Times report that a day off 'costs' the country x millions).

Bonfire Night and its Elizabethan Terror, orchestration, dungeon, rack, fire and sword will be forgotten so none of us will be allowed to see the similarities (were we ever?) with today's NWO orchestrated "bogeymen" who we are told threaten democracy (the rule of elected oligarchs, place-men of Masonry).

Bonfire Night will nestle betwixt Duvali, Yom Kippur, Ramadam, Christmas, Holocaust Day, Chinese New Year, Martin Luther King Day and the 57 Variety of multi-culti (trading) days to be respected by a compliant media.

Remember, remember the 5th of November
Government orchestrated plot
For the sake of freedom from the New World Order
This should never be forgot.

Sunday, 1 November 2009

So many lies - to advance a One World Masonic Agenda

The EU President is to be merely a chairman of the EU Commission.

That's how it is being sold to us.

Yes. And abortion was brought in for medical emergencies only. Now it's used by those who want to go on skiing holidays.

Hmmm. And "civil partnerships" weren't weddings proper. Now we're told poof y is "married" and poof x has a "husband."

Indeed. And we were persuaded to vote yes (to stay in!) the EEC as a trading bloc, not as a single state with a single currency and a single President!

Of course. And war was essential because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

It all starts to make sense. And millions died to free Poland from an invading neighbour, to allow the mass murdering Communists to enslave them for decades.

Conspiracy to defraud?

Guilty as charged!


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com