Last night's BBC documentary All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace, made by Adam Curtis who produced The Power of Nightmares, was very interesting.
Right: Alan Greenspan, boss of the private bank the Federal Reserve, which keeps Americans as tax-debt-slaves. The main follower of "Rand"/Rosenbaum is now one of the most powerful men in the world.
It showed that the ideology behind consumerism, banking free markets, individualism, etc. that the internet, dot.com bubble and banking boom of the 90s was run by the usual suspects.
Ayn Rand, the basis of the first episode was born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum. Curtis neglects to tell us this, perhaps for fear of being labelled an Anti-Semite.
Her ideology "Objectivism" - is pure individualism, one might say Thatcherism taking to an extreme, and devoid of morality. One of her top followers was Alan Greenspan. Her grouplet fell apart when she had an affair with one of her married followers.
Degenerates, Talmudic bankers, et al. These are the Modern Degenerates and Jewish Revolutionaries written about by E Michael Jones. They dress themselves up in new clothes, tweak their ideologies (just as Neo Cons went from being Marxists to Free Marketeers), anything to create a One World, Talmudic, Banking-led, godless world.
Just as Bolshevism in 1917 and the creation of the Federal reserve in 1913 - these people are only interested in having a Masonic elite ruling over us plebs.
Times change. Names change. But the ideologies and aims remain much the same.
I am reminded of the time the "dissidents" in Iran staged their demonstrations. Thousands of people took to the streets (kind of like the anti-war or pro-hunting demos here), and the Western media spun it into 'the people' rising against a corrupt oligarchy. This was fueled by the 'democratising' Twitter phenomenon. Only it transpired that so many Twits, Twuts or Twats, were coming out of areas like New York and Jerusalem.
This is what the "democratic internet" people do not understand. Just as the elites realised that they could control the mass media, through advertising revenues, direct control by oligarchies etc., so they can control the internet, by orchestrated campaigns dumping sheer volumes of Tweets, emails, reports etc., the setting up of "alternative" or news sources - and so much more.
If Twitter were the answer, the BBC wouldn't refer to it every time there is some sort of crisis or regime change in the world.
As Curtis's documentary made clear - just as with the Bolshevik Revolution (which was also Talmudic and godless) this revolution of computing mass-democratising individualism, led to yet more centralised control by a Talmudic few (in this case Greenspan and the Federal Reserve and the big Wall Street banks).
Plus ca change.