Sunday, 7 June 2009

Clash of Civilisations: 2000 Years of Anti-Christian Hatred


I just began reading a book entitled The Stripping of the Altars by Cambridge Professor Eamon Duffy after reading his more recent book on the reign of Mary Tudor (both published by Yale University Press).

Right: Prof Duffy's book on the grass roots faith of the people of England.

The book deals with the grass roots religion of the English people from circa 1400 to 1580, written to show that the changes imposed under Henry VIII, but primarily under the reign of Edward VI, were not universally embraced, moreover they were piecemeal and grudgingly enforced, and so easily reverted under the reign of Mary Tudor (e.g. removed Rood screens secretly stored and simply replaced).

That gives you some background anyway.

In the preface to the second edition Duffy answers some of his critics in relation to the mater of the Lollards in the early 15th Century. He answers that the Lollards had little effect on the population as a whole. In fact, the Lollards are an interesting pointer to how sometimes the path to hell is paved with good intentions, because some who justly called for a return to charitable acts and godly priests became twisted enough to attack the sacraments of the Church.

Some of their fellow early Lollards even turned on them and attacked them for this. It kind of makes you think of the Reformation itself, with many people fed up of genuine corruption in the Church, but the assault on Churches, the pulling down of statues etc. speaks of a far more suspect motive.

As such Duffy discusses those in the 15th Century who were attacking the very idea of the sacraments, especially of Christ's body, blood, soul and divinity being present in the Eucharist.

He writes of a Mid-15th Century play called the Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which he thinks was written in Suffolk. Here he tries to show how short-lived and shallow was 'Lollardy' because by this time the play, which could have been used to sucker-punch the Lollards and "contemporary heresy" makes no mention of them at all.

As Duffy himself says:

"The anti-sacramentalists of the play are Jews."

And that, I think, is the nub of the reality.

It was well to question corruption in the church - as many did and do. This finally resulted in the Counter Reformation (and if you get the chance, for a startling account of the theological and political nature of it and its ramifications for Europe, read The Counter Reformation 1550 - 1600 by B.J. Kidd published by SPCK, the London-based Anglican in-house publisher).

The force which always pushed against the Church as it existed and the sacraments were, surprise surprise, the Jews.

Little surprise there as the Crucifixion of Christ was the act of their religious leaders 2000 years ago, and as any genuine Christian or Jew will say the Church and Christians of the 15th Century believed with its heart and soul that the Sacramental nature of the Mass, the central pillar of daily and weekly life for most folk, was a re-enactment of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion.

In short there were Altars in every Church in every city, town and village because you need an Altar for a Sacrifice; and the vast majority of English (and European) people believed in the Sacrificial nature of the Mass.

Those opposed to this were the Jews, who rejected Christ and His Church.

This is the lesson for all history.

Who publishes the movies that blaspheme and mock our Christian heritage? Who runs the banks that enslave our people, business and government in illegal anti-Christian usury? Who bankrolled and organised Communism that ushered dozens upon dozens of millions of Christians to their deaths in gulags and via enforced starvation? Who are disproportionally present in so many "Western" governments - governments that betray our people, enslave us, destroy ancient freedoms and bring in multi-culti anti-religion?

Who promoted Luther and his works to attack the Church, only to reject even his watered-down Christianity (much to his chagrin after all their help and anti-Papal diatribes he thought he would convert them all) and so cause him to retaliate by writing 'The Jews and their Lies?'

What of the Jewish printing presses in places such as Amsterdam which published tracts attacking the Inquisition in Spain?

This was the Church's attempt to overturn heresy in its own ranks (note: nobody outside the Church could be brought in front of it) by "conversos" - Jews who claimed to have converted to Christianity yet continued a form of "Crypto-Judiac" religion. And yet the Jewish printing preses churned out material purporting to attack the Church for some kind of "genocide" of Jews.

Indeed, so many people (for the right and wrong reasons!) point to the Spanish Inquisition as the forerunner to the Shoa/Holohoax; and the roll of a controlled media in both events cannot be overstated.

As one nationalist wrote in his article on 'the Sacred Nature of the Six Million' the attempt in more recent decades has been to remove the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as the centre of world history, the point in time that all peoples looked to, with the "sacrifice" of the "six million" in WW2.

Some folks think when the Jews rejected Christ they were looking for a new militaristic messiah that would bring their world empire (er... New World Order), with the Jews as the "chosen people" at the head of it.

Others think that the Jewish people, or their religious/political leaders, now consider themselves to be a kind of messiah (a form of Race worship), with a duty to control the world, bring "enlightenment" to the world (hence the role of Freemasonry etc.) and throw off the shackles of Christian "superstition."

Right: A satire on the French Revolution, yet in The Terror of the Masonic French Revolution, there was a real Talmudic bloodlust to murder all those who adhered to Christianity and Tradition. The hatred of Christianity saw a naked whore enthroned in a Cathedral as the goddess Reason, and the Eiffel Tower constructed on consecrated Hosts, to show the Masonic "victory" over Christ.

They founded Freemasonry as a "gentile Judaism" to bring about revolutions and amoral politrickery, and even Freemasons have admitted that their religion is Talmudic and Luciferian.

They founded Communism to bring about a revolution against Christianity and to establish their Utopian vision (of gulags and repression). Communists and Jews have admitted that Communism was Jewish.

They even founded Islam some 1400 years ago as a means to stop Christianity spreading eastwards to their new lands in the Khazaria region, to provide a buffer-zone.

Anyhoo, the issue here is that whether we look at Palestine at the time of Christ, 7th Century Arabia, Mid 15th Century England, 17th Century Spain, 18th Century France, 20th Century Russia, 21st Century America or so many other times and nations, the "Clash of Civilisations" is clear.

It has been a fight ongoing for 2000 years.

If we value our Christian heritage then we have to know our history, we have to know who our enemy is, and why they hate us and Christianity.

Unless we know all this, any resistance, any fight for national Independence is meaningless, because our historical enemy will merely take it and pervert it to their own ends.

If Nationalism becomes Zionist then it has lost before it has even got anywhere.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

How about everyone has another read of Cobetts' 'Rural Rides' ever more prescient in these times?

khamas goy said...

Good points, but Islam is definetly not a jewish fabrication, please open up your bible, deutronomy 18:18, which refers to the brethren of the Israelites, the ishmaelites, the Arabs of the Arabian peninsula, through Ishmael son of Abraham peace be upon him, who prophet muhammed peace be upon him, is directly descended from, we are their worse nightmare and it is only us who are standing in their way from total global domination, the Jews have fought against the message of Islam from day one, there is absolutely no basis for your claim whatsoever,

Rufus said...

Don't forget that William Stadholder was bought and paid for by Jewish finaciers. His reign pushed anti-Catholicism to genocidal limits, resulting in the virtual destruction of Catholicism in mainland Britain and the butchery of the Irish, with the subsequent Catholic-Protestant fratricide. Cromwell's worked for his Kabbalist masters was horrendous enough, but King Billy's treachery eclipsed that.

Who benefitted from the creation of the Church of England, witrh its anti-Christian tenets (pro-abortion (murder), pro-divorce (adultery), pro-capitalism (theft, covetousness, Mammonism)? Why, the enemies of Christianity who now are ensconced in positions of power in every area of British life. The B'nai Brit-ish establishment.

For a look at the Jewish bloodlines of the Royals and aristocracy, visit:

http://www.henrymakow.com/englands_jewish_aristocracy.html

Final Conflict said...

There are a couple of interesting books which explain how and why Rabbis created Islam to protect their settle lands from the expansion Eastwards by Christianity.

Brother Michael of the Abbe de Nantes community in France - if memory serves me right - wrote a scholarly tome on it, which was translated into English.

If anyone can provide a link to it...

It is sad that Christianity is not overtly anti-Zionist AS IT SHOULD BE!

How can you support those who regard Christ as the enemy?

khamas goy said...

The revelation of the Quran was revealed amongst one of the largest communities of jews in the world,in medina,arabia, these jews rejected the prophet muhammed (pbuh) because he was not from amongst their race out of jealousy and malicious envy even though he was came with that which confirmed the true teachings of the torah and gospel before they were tampered with.these jewish tribes constantly conspired with the pagan arabs to extinguish the religion even after entering into pacts with the muslims, culminating in their plot to attack a heavily outnumbered muslim force who were defending medina from pagan idol worshipping arabs by launching an Attack from the rear even though their was a treaty between the muslims and jews which resulted in the execution of 600 jews and their expulsion from arabia.
These are well established facts accepted by western and muslim historians alike.

khamas goy said...

100 per cent agree with you fc about how christians can side with those who curse jesus and his blessed mother against us muslims who revere and respect them both highly, this just illustrates how shallow and superficial their faith is and how completely lacking in understanding they are, even pope john paul went to a synagogue and lit a menorah, if that isnt an act of disbelief then what is?
But he was a jew, as his mother was and his pandying to jewish elements who were unhappy with aspects of christianity are testament to this.

Anonymous said...

Christianity would not be 'anti-Zionist' Mount Zion is important to Christians.

Zionism is a term used by the Ashkenazi for what is in fact Kabbalism.

khamas goy said...

Also, and in relation to your article, shiaism, the heretical sect was started by a jew who exploited political differences over leadership to form a splinter group of the muslims to divide and weaken islam and the muslims and then introduced innovations into the religion which have nothing to do with islam, like those lunatics who to around beating themselves with chains in iran.

Final Conflict said...

I think we need to be careful here.

From a Christian perspective Islam is a Heresy. It is a quasi Judaic/Christian sect without priests or the sacrifice of the Mass.

If it were founded amidst Jews, doesn't mean it wasn't a heresy put together to stop the spread of Christianity. The idea wouldn't have been to "convert" Jews whose race was already of their race.

That being said, every theologian and historian knows that the real enmity lies between Christianity and Judaism...

and if Nick Griffin MEP wishes to defend Christianity and stop those who publish attacks on Christianity he must seek a ban on The Talmud, the Kabbalah and expel the sect that calls Jesus a bastard and Mary a whore.

But I guess there's no media plaudits in that... ;-)

khamas goy said...

It still doesnt hold water, why would jews propogate an ideology that banned giving or taking of usury, that expelled them from arabia a land they claim as eretz israel as it lies between the nile and euphrates as symbolised in their national flag by the two blue lines and one that dealt with jews so uncomprimisingly and direct (but fair) in terms of their behavourial traits and history while dealing with christians in a much warmer way.

Anonymous said...

christians believe that Jesus is the Son of God, Islam has it that he is merely a prophet of Mohammed, the jew sees Jesus as a false prophet/not the Messiah.

Christians believe that the only way to Salvation and to Heaven is by accepting Jesus as their Saviour, therefore it stands to reason that to believe any other 'religion' is to believe in heresy.

khamas goy said...

Er... No. We muslims believe that jesus pbuh is a prophet of allah, of almighty god, the messiah, and the last prophet to the israelites, not of muhammed pbuh who is himself a prophet .muhammed pbuh is the final prophet for all of mankind and we await the return of jesus when we will fight the antichrist and those who follow him, NWO.

Christus Rex said...

FC once again delights us and educates those unaware as to the TRUTH of the Church and of the real ANTI-CHRISTS.

The Enemy of Humanity wears many masks but behind it is the same old face.

Titus 1:14
Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16
14For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

15Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

16Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

John 7:13
Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.

John 19:38
And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus.

John 20:19
Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.

Matthew 27:25
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

Revelation 2:9
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.


May God look after our brother FC and all who support his work for Christ and our race.

We wish no harm to our Muslim friends and neighbors who also are victims of the Evil One.

Let us cooperate when possible in defending the Good against the Evil.

http://my.telegraph.co.uk/ironwand/blog/2008/10/27/who_stole_our_culture
Who Stole Our Culture?
Monday, October 27, 2008, 10:24 PM GMT

Anonymous said...

But does Islam not see Mohammed as the direct descendant of Allah and Jesus lower down the order as it were?

Khamas goy said...

No, there is no such thing as a direct descendant of Allah. God is the creatOR, men are from the creatION.

Anonymous said...

That is why Islam is a heresy.


MusicPlaylistView Profile
Create a playlist at MixPod.com