Barbarians with Prisoners

THE PRISONERS ARE COMING HOME...

How annoying for the Zionist trouble-makers and s###-stirrers.

They so wanted the prisoner crisis between the UK and Iran to escalate.

Yet again, President Ahmadinejad of Iran has proven himself to be a canny leader and a man capable of pulling the rug from under the Zionists (in America, Israel and the UK).

When they were screaming against revisionists and banning books, he allowed a Revisionist Conference to take place.

But surely the "Western Democrats" are for Freedom of Speech? So why did they protest, these purveyors of faeces sculpted into "art," the sponsors of Tracey Emins and Damien Hurst, the watchers of Jerry Springer the Opera?

When the "Danish" cartoons (run by a Jewish editor) caused open and obvious offence, he ran the cartoons against Zionism, the Holohoax etc...

But surely the "Western Democrats" are for Freedom of Speech? They allowed the Jewish-sponsored cartoons designed to stir up the Muslims... yet not the cartoons against the Holohoax???

And here he is with his latest move. Whilst Zionists of all shades screeched for military action, and accused those of us who pointed out the facts, of being "traitors and cowards" - his actions proved that any kind of sabre-rattling would not have led to the sailors release.

There is now no doubt that the UK running to the (US sponsored) UN resulted in the delay over the prisoners release. If the UK had acted like grown-ups and approached Iran one-on-one as equals (as they did towards the end) the prisoners would have been released far sooner.

All Iran wanted was assurance that this (second) incursion into its territory by armed forces busy suppressing its neighbours on behalf of Israel would not be repeated and that guarantees to that end would be given.

Still, do you know what the overwhelming image of this whole situation will be?

That of British prisoners treated with kindness, well fed, staying together, playing chess, well clothed, etc.

OK, it's possible that the videos weren't absolutely voluntary (and expect the Zionists to now switch to that, to try and grasp something from the situation).

But let us get one thing straight here.

There were no orange jump-suits. There was no shackling. There was no solitary confinement. There was no mistreatment and torture. There was no affront to their religion. There was no sexual abuse and rape.

What's the matter with the Iranians?

If they did some of the above, perhaps they too could be brave allies of ours (like the Americans, the Saudis, the Iraqi traitors etc.).

If they had tortured, abused, humiliated, starved and raped the prisoners they too could have been on "our side" defending democracy!

Have they learnt nothing of the torture chambers in Iraq? Of Guantanamo Bay?

Let's imagine an Iranian boat was caught off the Florida Keys... do we honestly think the Yanks would treat the prisoners with anything but contempt?

What this escapade has shown the civilised world ( and I mean those of us who are civilised, moral and cling to values such as Faith, Family and Nation - not anyone who sides with the American and Israeli whores in office) is that the way a nation treats its prisoners is a reflection of that nation's values.

America, Israel and Saudi Arabia (three key "allies") treat their prisoners like filth. They are filthy regimes.

It's as easy as that.
Pictured here: US prison guards, Sabrina Harman and Richard Garner, posing for a photo with thumbs up, beside the corpse of an Iraqi prisoner, Monadel Al-Jamadi, who was killed under torture in Abu Ghraib prison.. (Alquds Alarabi, 5/21/04).