So Prince Harry (pictured right) has apologised for using the terms "paki" and later "raghead" in a 'home video' taken with his army friends.
The "Paki-Gate" affair raises a number of interesting points:
1. Is the word "paki" illegal?
2. If not is calling someone a "Scot" illegal? Or a Saudi? Or a Khazak? Or an Afghani? Or an Iraqi? Or an Israeli?
3. Furthermore if it is illegal: will it be an arrestable offence to say "I'm going down the paki shop" if your neighbour overhears you? Or if a child or sibling has the hump over something else and reports you?
4. And if it is illegal - will it be illegal for an Asiatic person (Jew or Gentile) to call someone from these islands a Scot? or Taffy? or Mick? or Brit? If not won't that show favouritism to non-White communities and individuals?
5. If it's not illegal - and with hundreds of thousands of people using the term day-in, day-out one has to wonder - why the fuss? After all it is merely an abbreviation of "Pakistan."
6. If it is illegal - why has a simple "sorry" from Prince Harry sufficed to stop an arrest and a charge? After all, if it is illegal we have to assume that anyone else who isn't royal or upper class would be arrested and charged (not to mention getting their door kicked in).
7. If it is illegal will the various t-shirts and other paraphernalia with the words "PROUD TO BE A PAKI" be made illegal and their usage banned?
8. Last but not least - why are we living in and accepting a society wherein the words "f##k," "c##t" and many other highly offensive terms are used on TV, seen on t-shirts, shown in shop windows and much more, with no action taken by the police, the courts etc., yet a simple abbreviation of a nation's name (same as Scot) is deemed unusable and offensive (even to the stupid degree that Pakistan is no longer pronounced Paki-Stan by BBC newsreaders but rather Parky-Starn in a ridiculous pc attempt to be non-offensive!).
Would someone please wake me up -- I must be dreaming!
Monday, 12 January 2009
Prince Harry's "Paki-Gate" - and the BBC's "Parky-Starn" Rule
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Is it a mere coincidence that this is yet another 'Exclusive' from the News of the World, and the fact that the proprietor of said publication is one Khazar Republican Rupert Murdoch? Hmmmmmm....
This is not another example of a story which not only disparages the idea of Monarchy, but also has served to drown out and move the 'Gaza story' from the headlines.
Apart from the fact that this is a 3 year old bit of footage, why is no one concerned about the identity of the two-faced, backstabbing, treacherous snake in the grass who placed this in the hands of the NoW?
most sickening of all was the way bone fide career politician david
cameron jumped up to condemn harrys comments, yet another excuse for cameron to get his face on the tv. these politicians will hijack any news story just to get themselves noticed.
like most nationalists im not a racist and i dont want to abuse people of another racial background. in fact i celebrate their unique identity, just as i celebrate my white heritage.
the way i see it the racism in society comes from career mongers like cameron and people in the media who want to make a mountain out of a molehill.
They've really gone out of their way at the News of the World/Sun stable (?sty),haven't they? This serves three purposes:
(1) Gaza off the front pages
(2) Lack of ideas/activity of the economy by the three major political parties
(3) Old Judeo-Communist Frankfurt School trick - enforce political correctness with a high profile case - "The young Prince is unable to behave badly - see?"
Post a Comment