Hardline Revisionist Recants Holocaust Views on National TV

Just a few years ago I recall someone on the "nationalist scene" using the most vitriolic and personal abuse against a man whom many (rightly or wrongly) viewed as a 'leader.'

Certainly in the vocation he had chosen, the man being attacked was pretty much at the peak of his profession and an inspiration to many patriots and men of goodwill, reaching more and more of the 'man in the street' via the material he was putting out.

Yet this did not stop him being attacked for "selling out" the inference being that he was a traitor or a coward.

The man being attacked was David Irving, the historian.

His "crime" (as I remember) was to state that the "holocaust" had happened (albeit not to such an extent etc.) but that it was not a German policy, and that it had happened without the knowledge/consent of Hitler.

So who was this "hardliner" who attacked the person of a historian for his own opinion? A historian who still faced the ire and outright hatred of organised Zionism?

Step forward Nick Griffin!

To him, to not question the "holocaust" was unthinkable, and by 'stepping back from the brink' in accepting the "holocaust" in even a limited way, Irving had sold out to the Zionist establishment etc. etc.

No doubt Mr. Irving - who, whether you support him or not, has suffered a great deal for his research and heartfelt beliefs - is feeling gratified for all this abuse in light of the Daily Politics TV show on the BBC on Monday.

On Monday's show, you see dear forbearing and patient reader, Mr. Griffin stated that the holocaust - the destruction of millions of Jews on an industrial scale - was an undeniable fact.

There was also the liberal stance on the Gurkhas, which I hinted that some Kosher Tories would do a few days ago (see recent posts), in that the Asian mercenaries would be allowed to come here.

Plus of course there was the welcome to the Jewish community and Judaism itself - no surprise really following the "most Zionist" party tag given to the BNP during the London mayoral election campaign.

So if Mr. Griffin was right to condemn Mr. Irving as a traitor/sell-out what should those of us who consider ourselves revisionists, to one degree or another, make of the very interesting interview on Monday?

Some people complained years ago of liberalisation and sell-out in the BNP only to be told it was a case of "softly, softly, catchee monkey" - or was it more a case of a slow process as the "supertanker" of the BNP was turned slowly in a wide arc (as arch Neo Con apologist David Aaronivitch was told by the BNP leader)?

We at FC have long warned that the sell-out process is worrying, especially as the sell-outs become increasingly open the bigger the crumbs offered from the political top-table.

If we have to vote for a corrupt, cronyist, Zionist, multi-culti ("some of my best friends are Sikhs") party, shouldn't we just hold our noses and go for UKIP until the BNP radicalises in some way or rids itself of the paedophile and Zionist members?

As the Euro elections approach this is a debate that will continue!

Meanwhile the Daily Politics show (Monday 11th May) is still available to view on the iplayer facility at the BBC's homepage. See for yourself...