If it is true that NATO has attacked and killed one of Gaddafi's sons and three of Gaddafi's grandchildren, as is just being reported, then it is clear that NATO have broken the remit of UN resolution 1973, and the act of the Neo Cons and war hawks in Washington and London in pretending that they are acting lawfully is exposed as a farce.
They have attacked and killed civilians. They have committed a war crime.
This is exactly why we should do as "we" have with other countries - condemn bad governments where needs be, agitate for peace etc. but do not get involved in foreign conflicts.
We have had to many foreign Zionist adventures which have left the world a far less safe place.
NATO involvement in Libya has to end. British, US and French involvement on the side of the rebels (whoever they are) has to end.
Saturday, 30 April 2011
Sunday, 24 April 2011
Thanks to Griffin Watch for highlighting this first one. More follow:
Can we see this exposed on the EDL or BNP site? Note how Christians are 'evil' and how Jews rejected Christ?
This is not a neo-nazi video, or a Christian extremist video. It is Jewish!
They can spout their hatred with impunity. It is this evil mindset that infects the Masons, Marxists and the homosexual lobby.
This people demand laws protecting Judaism and Islam in Europe - yet attack our Faith in Israel! Christian Palestinians are attacked, bombed, machine-gunned and our Churches are strafed by the Israeli Army.
Yet these anti-Christian people and this anti-Christ religion is what the EDL and BNP think we should be allied to! The EDL even use the Cross whilst defend Judaism -- don't they know that Jews spit on the Cross and hate Christ?
It is Easter Sunday.
Read the account of the Crucifixion. Learn your history! Watch The Passion of the Christ. Understand why there has been a 2000 year war between Christians and Judaism, and why the latter organised and sponsored Freemasonry, Communism and the Homosexual Lobby.
It has all been about destroying Christianity.
Saturday, 23 April 2011
A very Happy St George's Day to all FC's English readers and supporters.
St George became the patron Saint of England after the returning Crusaders brought his cult back from Palestine.
In standing up to the pagan Roman Empire the Roman soldier St George showed that soldiers and warriors could lay down their lives for the Church and gain martyrdom.
An important ideal to those fighting the Crusades, to protect pilgrims who were being attacked and to defend Churches that were being destroyed. The Crusades were defensive wars (thus, just wars) not offensive wars (such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Lebanon, Palestine etc. today)
Above Right: St George Rose Knight Flag available here.
NB: To those gullible, ignorant or wilful miscreants who claim that St George was a Turk, he was not. It is thought he was from Asia Minor, but in the first Millennia that land was Greek/Byzantine/Roman and not "Turkish" or Asiatic. In fact it had some of the earliest Churches. St George was a European soldier in a European army. We've had enough of the atheist, communist, masonic lies. They're boring.
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
Miliband ally admits that Labour lied over immigration.
We all know that Labour WANTED more immigrants. Blair and an advisor planned it to undermine "racism."
We all know that Big Business wanted it to keep wages low.
Yet again we the people suffer so the core values of Socialism and Capitalism can be advanced.
Monday, 18 April 2011
Buttering my toast this morning*, I was watching the newspaper review on BBC News 24. They referred to a political party called True Finns, who seem to be growing in support, and who seem to be Eurosceptic.
That all sounds fine and groovy.
The funny thing was that the talking head doing the reviews said words to the effect** of 'they claim not be nationalistic, but then they are opposed to more immigration into Finland.'
Right: Opposing immigration is "extremist" yet snorting cocaine is fine and dandy -- welcome to the media world.
What struck me here is that this was mentioned (to the Asiatic presenter) as something quite sinister, and I think the word "extreme" even made its way into the banter.
Pardon me! Since when is it extreme to oppose the EU or immigration?
Imagine our grandparents being asked these questions:
- Do you think it would be extreme to keep Britain as it is, with its wealth of native cultures, and its addition of European cultures? Or would it be extreme to bring over many millions of Asians and Africans?
- Do you think it would be extreme to keep Europe as a bloc of trading, friendly nations with peace treaties and suchlike to ensure security and peace, all in the framework of Christian traditions? or would it be extreme to have a single European currency, central European bank, unelected European Commission deciding laws, and a Human Rights legislation handing out new laws against Christians and promoting homosexuality?
This is the same reason why these media-heads consider Christians and their hatred of homosexuality (loving the sinner, hating the sin etc. etc.) "extremist" because they cannot countenance anything else.
The mindset of the Marxists who have infiltrated local government, schools and the media is made to seem "mainstream" whereas those who are Traditional (in politics, religion, morals etc.) are made out as the "New Nazis."
Our streets are awash with drugs, immigration has delivered chaos and gun crime, homosexuality and its promotion is creating a sexual laissez faire society with the concurrent amorality in all spheres... and these people wonder why our society is crumbling?
Their "truths" born out of the cultural, sexual, political, religious and moral maelstrom that was the 60s, are separate from the rest of history - and yet we are told to believe in all their PC claptrap as if it were the Gospel Truth. Not even all men alive today believe in it, just those men (and wymmin) who own, run, staff and are bribed by the oligarchs' structures of power (banks, media and political parties).
Bear this in mind dear reader:
We are getting a referendum-vote on the AV voting system in the UK in May, which even its chief promoter (the Lib Dems' Nick Clegg) said was a "miserable little compromise," yet 'we' were never (in the 50s, 60s, 70s etc.) given a referendum on the decision to let in millions of non-whites which changed our millennia-old society almost overnight, which destroyed whole communities, which changed our religious identity, and so much more (let's not even dissect street crime, gun crime, drug crime etc.).
Ask yourself this:
- Which is of more importance to us as the peoples of these isles? Which has more impact on our lives, on our communities, on our children? Which has more impact on the safety of the elderly?
- Which is of more importance to the Bilderberg/Rothschild marionette traitors in parliament? Or the cocaine-using sexual degenerates in the media?
To answer these questions gives the answer to our present malaise.
Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our father.
GK Chesterton, Orthodoxy
* yes - I'm living the dream! It''s that rock n roll lifestyle again.
** Come on! It was 5.45am and I wasn't taking notes!
Sunday, 17 April 2011
Peter Hitchens writes of David Cameron:
The Prime Minister is an opportunist who doesn’t believe in anything...And that, dear reader, is the problem the BNP has been in. First lurching into what is now called "civic nationalism," then veering back into racial nationalism; then seeking black supporters and members, then fighting against black members; then seeking to be pro-Israeli, then trying to look anti-Zionist... Under Nick Griffin the BNP has (supposedly) believed in one then the other.
It’s easily proved, by tracking his changing views on any subject you care to name since he first sought office. Zig, zag, and zig again where necessary.
But don’t delude yourself that a man with no principles won’t do any damage. Because his only concern is to gain and hold office, he will do all he can for that end.
The flip-flop nature of the BNP over the last decade has been painful to behold.
Right: Sikh and ye shall find. A tame Sikh joins the civic nationalist BNP - which now attacks other patriotic groups for being, er, civic nationalist.
And so we have Eddy Butler pointing out to us all where the BNP has gone wrong, and what must be done (to nationalism!) to make it right again.
On the money, he's right. From the firing of Dave Newlands back in 1999 (? correct me if I'm wrong) the BNP has been out of control with no financial controls, a relative fiefdom - and some have questioned if that were a "reward" for the u-turns on repatriation, coloured supporters, Zionism and more.
But on the politics?
Funnily enough Mr. Butler and the other 'voices in the wilderness' were until recently fully in the Griffin camp, whilst the Trafalgar Club slush fund was raided and whilst the policy flip flops went on... It is only really since the advent of Jim Dowson, with the millions of pounds raised and the subsequent debts (which left Butler and others asking where all the money went) which has led to rupture.
Griffin Watch, one of the net's most vociferous critics of the BNP's policy and finances has warned that Butler's differences are not, in essence, political and I would tend to agree. In and of itself there is nothing wrong with that. As long as people know where he stands!
To give an example, Mr. Butler recently ran a couple of articles exposing Mr. Griffin's past. It was meant to shock and awe the current crop of BNP activists and supporters. What it actually did was expose the old Griffin (radical, ideologue, racialist and nationalist - even if off the back of others) when compared to the new Griffin (money-intensive, flip-flop, EU-waged politician).
The comments on his Condemned to Repeat 2 post were most interesting, because it seems that even today nationalists (BNP and otherwise) are not taken in by Zionist lies and propaganda: they are prepared to read and understand articles about anti-Zionist governments, about foreign nationalisms and about potential allies outside Europe.
One of the issues with the Modern BNP (under Griffin and including Butler) has been that it has thought that following a vaguely pro-Israeli line has been a money-spinner, a vote-winner, a media-placating and positive move. What they fail to understand is that being pro-Israel (even with caveats) rips the guts out of nationalist activists, because they instinctively and intrinsically know that nationalism has always denounced Israel and Zionism.
I am reminded of the time this very blog put up a "Love Palestine" banner with a link through to a site exposing Zionist war crimes etc. Some Nu-BNP braindead moron put a story up on a forum (Stormfront I think) on how FC was "pro-Muslim." And that, my friends, is the level of twit we are dealing with, and that is the zombie-moron bred when groups like the BNP become Muzzie-bashing pro-Israeli pressure groups.
Mr. Butler has exposed many wrongs in the BNP, mostly financial, and in that respect will be proved correct in the not too distant future when the pigeons come home to roost.
Left: The "Jews are voting for us" BNP have now been overtaken by the pro-Israeli EDL, and so denounce them as "Zionist." Pots? Kettles?
However, as his attempt to "dirty" Griffin with his Libyan links shows, Mr. Butler is misfiring. He would do better to condemn and expose Mr. Griffin's cosying up to the Israeli lobby and the betrayal of nationalism that took place at that time. Unfortunately he can't because Mr. Butler was one of NG's lieutenants at that time and politically is of the same ilk.
The finance scandals will probably see NG hoisted high and left to dry. The political ones won't, because there are still plenty around who feel that the betrayals of the last 10 years have to be continued...
Nationalism still has much to suffer.
The Mail on Sunday is a Zionist rag. Yet, as with the equally vomit-inducing socialist Guardian, it sometimes publishes items verging on the truth (albeit with their controlling twist).
With The Mail it's usually immigration (but they aren't against race-mixing) and The Guardian it's on Zionist wars (but they aren't against Israel and Zionist power per se).
Of course the flip side is that the Mail is screamingly pro-Israel and The Guardian is screamingly pro-immigrant.
Whatever poison you choose your nation suffers: that's the truth of the controlled mass-media.
Anyway today's Mail on Sunday has a glimmer of the truth.
A man who chose to display a palm cross (today is Palm Sunday) in his works van is facing the sack from a boss who is free to display a picture of Che Guevara in his office (pictured above)!
That's the truth of it. All this anti-Christian hysteria doesn't come from the Muslims, the Sikhs, the Zoroastrians (?) or the 57 varieties of multi-faith pick n mix ecumaniacal religions flourishing in post-Christian Britain.
The hatred towards Christianity comes from the Marxists, the Socialists, the Masons, the Zionists: the extreme anti-Christian political commissars of the Left and Right, the type that infest the political parties, that infest Brussels (and so create the EU 'human rights' legislation).
These are the people who ban Christmas celebrations: the Muslims et al don't really care -- it's the cultural Marxists who are behind the local government schemes: they are the Marxist "Al Qaeda" out to ban and banish Christ, and they use the excuse of Muslims, Sikhs etc. when the latter don't really mind that much.
The same cultural Marxists push homosexuality, multi-culti, race-mixing and more in the schools, in the local papers etc.
Oh yes, faggots have their rights. The Jews and Muslims have their rights. The Satanists have their rights. The "Transgender community" have their rights. All ushered on by Marxists in local government and Bankster-bribed Masons in national government and the EU.
Everyone has the right to do anything. Do What Thou Wilt is the Crowleyesque order of the day. Poofs jailed for public outrages and worse are played on the radio. Known druggies infest the media. The "heroes" of today are the degenerates, all cheered on by a media run by the same degenerates, poofs and druggies. Imagine a celeb speaking against homosexuality or immigration? Do you think his songs would get played or he'd still host a TV show?
Yes - everyone has the right to do anything: except Christians of course!
Christianity has been pegged into a 'Songs of Praise' corner. As long as you sing Kum-By-Ya, accept homosexuals, embrace multi-culti and think of Christianity as one-amongst-many in the pick n mix range that has "enriched" the UK (enriched is a media code word for chaos, destruction, loss and invasion/colonialism), then you get the thumbs up from the poofs and druggies infesting the media.
As long as you adopt this Judaised, bastardised, EU-acceptable empty husk then you get the all clear from the powers-that-be.
But if you are a Christian that stands publicly by your Faith, that says others are false, that condemns homosexuality, usury, abortion etc. - then watch out!
The cultural Marxists will scream for your blood. These media cases (like the B&B sodomites and the Sodomites kissing in a pub) are show-trials. They are put out to scare us into shutting up, to warn us against speaking out.
This is a war. It is a war being waged in parliaments, in councils, in businesses and on the streets.
It is our duty to fight back.
Friday, 15 April 2011
...it was a great article on the Zionist role in Fukushima.
Israel introduced the Stuxnet virus into Iran's nuclear energy plants last year, as you will be aware. The Jerusalem Post reported on the 30th December 2010 that the British State was also involved with Mossad in attempting to sabotage Iran's nuclear programme. This sabotage included not only Stuxnet, but also the assassination of 5 Iranian nuclear scientists and an explosion which killed 18 Iranian technicians.
In regard to Fukushima, Haaretz is now reporting that it was the Israeli security firm Magna that was providing “security” for the plant prior to the incident. Magna is based in Dimona, the very site where Israel carried out the testing on the Stuxnet virus.
This is the reality of Zionist terror; a terror which sees the goyim of Japan as expendable, along with the million dead Iraqis and the unknown number of dead in Afghanistan, Libya, Palestine and across the world.
It rather puts the “threat” of the burqa into perspective, don’t you think?
Picture above is of Zionist Federation demo against the peace Flotilla, which was stormed by Uzi waving Israeli Commandos. The EDL announced it was joining this Pro-Israel demo. Nice.
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
The failing coolant systems in Fukushima, Japan were brought down by the Stuxnet virus, which effects some older coolant systems (the reason why Germany shut down its older reactors in the wake of the disaster).
The earthquake and tsunami didn't cause the release of radioactive materials - the USA/Israel Stuxnet virus did that!
Why is the world media ignoring the facts?
Why aren't we told of the criminal activities of these people (in yet another sovereign state) that will effect countless thousands of innocents?
Why are Neo-Cons, Zionists, the NWO (call them what you will) allowed to get away with this disaster against the Japanese people?
If Iran or similar were behind the virus it would be headlines day after day after day.
Time for the USA-Israel criminals to be brought to book.
Just why do trolls bother?
We regularly get weird messages, usually from trolls accusing us of being Communists, or Nazis. Then we get some accusing us of being race-mixing traitors, or White supremacists. And so it goes on, and on, and on.
It gets quite boring.
The latest bizarre missive is just so - well, bizarre - here it is in all its absurd glory:
Greetings Comrade,Was reading the fine print and noticed the restrictions on anti-racists, govt spooks and other scum from viewing your website. As I enjoy reading up on the news and in fact use it as my one true source, I still felt a bit uneasy.You see, I used to be a member of Israelis against Apartheid; the foremost organization of anti-racists and peace-lovers in Israelis who are known for their provocative actions all to advance "brotherly love" and "goodwill".I have since recognized the error of my ways and thus renounced my former affiliations with this group of untermenschen and joined "Kahane Chai"; A militant group, of true patriots the likes of whom I am sure you are familiar with.My question is, in light of my devotion to the patriotic causes of Jewish supremacy and fighting for Eretz Israel, do I still fit the grade?My former anti-racist leanings notwithstanding?please reply ASAP, as your enlightened musings and opinions on the problems of the world mean everything to me.yours truly for a world free of internet filth,
Friday, 8 April 2011
Giving £650 Million to Pakistan?
Whilst our schools, libraries, services close?
We have money for bankers, money for immigrants, money for dole bums, and now money for Pakistan!
Madness thy name is Cameron.
Sunday, 3 April 2011
- The (Gaddafy) Libyan air force bombed civilians. There is no proof of this and Russian satellites have shown no evidence of sorties against civilians or civilian centres.
- Meanwhile the "allies" have already killed civilians as well as rebel forces in "friendly fire."
- Gaddafy would have slaughtered thousands in Benghazi. Again no proof has been offered. Where are the thousands killed in other towns and cities captured?
- The "allies" say talk of "house to house" searches in a conquered Benghazi is proof - yet just the other day reported "house to house" searches by the rebels in one town, which they were then pushed back out of.
- Video of rockets, tanks and artillery from the Libyan Army was shown as proof of Gaddafy targeting civilians. No proof of this was shown.
- Video of rockets and similar shot by rebels outside of "pro-Gaddafy" towns was dismissed as 'the rebels firing on Gaddafy loyalists' positions' by sections of the media and Neo Cons/war hawks.
How much more hypocrisy do we have to put up with? Where is the NATO intervention in Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and (dare I say it?) Israel?
Enough is enough.
As some dark chappies once said: Don't believe the hype.